Talk:Jordanian nationality law

Jordanian nationality law has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: December 7, 2023. (Reviewed version).

Jordan High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jordan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jordan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JordanWikipedia:WikiProject JordanTemplate:WikiProject JordanJordan articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks YOU can help with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

Nationality vs. citizenship

In some contexts (and some Wikipedia articles), citizenship implies nationality but not vice versa. One can be a "national" without being a citizen. So I think some clarification might be needed here. 伟思礼 (talk) 00:22, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Jordanian nationality law/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: FenrisAureus (talk · contribs) 02:22, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

Last updated at 2024-02-04 07:14:01 by Cewbot

See what the criteria are and what they are not

1) Well-written

1a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct

1b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation

LGTM :) — FenrisAureus ▲ (she/they) (talk) 22:38, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2) Verifiable with no original research

2a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline

2b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)

2c) it contains no original research

2d) it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism

3) Broad in its coverage

3a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic

3b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)

4) Neutral:

4) Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each

5) Stable:

5) Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute

6) Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio

6a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content

6b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

No images in the article at present. I would suggest photos of passports, and maps of territorial acquisitions/losses in the section on the west bank. On hold until remediated. — FenrisAureus ▲ (she/they) (talk) 02:32, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I added a contemporary map of Jordan that includes the West Bank. I typically do not include images of passports in nationality law articles since they repeat the national emblem of the country which is already shown in the infobox, and therefore do not represent much added value in illustration. Horserice (talk) 04:47, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. Pass. — FenrisAureus ▲ (she/they) (talk) 22:40, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Overall: Good work! Have a barnstar!— FenrisAureus ▲ (she/they) (talk) 23:04, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs to show the figure what percentage of Jordan residents are nationals. --95.24.66.180 (talk) 18:43, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nationality vs. citizenship

GA Review

GA review

Share