User talk:Oneequalsequalsone

Cardinality of compact Hausdorff spaces

I wonder if you might have meant separable compact Hausdorff spaces without isolated points? It might be true in that case. I have a vague memory that separable compact Hausdorff spaces are automatically Polish, and it is certainly true that every nonempty Polish space without isolated points has the cardinality of the continuum. If you're interested in finding out more you might ask a question at WP:RD/Math. -Trovatore (talk) 20:49, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Trovatore, thanks for reaching out.

I'm a complete novice in topology so I'm afraid I can't follow this. I was just interested to find out if the contribution was reverted because of its falseness or because of other reasons Oneequalsequalsone (talk) 21:16, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, OK, but you must have had some reason for the original edit. What made you think it was true? --Trovatore (talk) 23:04, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, now I see it wasn't you, but an IP contributor. Never mind.... --Trovatore (talk) 23:12, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to the Mearsheimer article and RUSUKR restrictions

Hi. I noticed you recently made edits to John Mearsheimer. I am not here to argue with the substance of your edits, just to point out that, while in principle you can edit the article, the specific part of the article you edited falls under the umbrella of WP:RUSUKR. Users that do not yet enjoy extended confirmed status are not permitted to edit in and around the topic of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, broadly construed (this includes editing parts of other articles if and when they refer to this conflict). I do not believe you were acting in bad faith (or that you were aware of the restriction at all!), so there is nothing for you to worry about - just be mindful of this until you become extended confirmed. Cheers. Ostalgia (talk) 08:05, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I was not aware of this Oneequalsequalsone (talk) 09:07, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Oliver Eagleton

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Oliver Eagleton requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MrBauer24 (talk) 00:09, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oliver Eagleton moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Oliver Eagleton, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Bbb23 (talk) 00:13, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Bbb23,

Thanks for letting me know. I have cited everything in the article. Obviously it needs more work to extend its content but it's a start? What about WP:BOLD? What is the use of keeping it in draft instead of putting it out there so people can add to it? Oneequalsequalsone (talk · contribs) 00:19, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

This is due to the article, which is about a living person, not having enough evidence that this person is significant. Please see the information outlined here for more information about this. MrBauer24 (talk) 00:21, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) It's not ready for article space. Based on the content, it's not clear that the subject is notable. I strongly suggest you use WP:AFC so more experienced users can review it and give you feedback about what's needed. If you insist on moving it back to article space, you run the risk that it will be outright deleted (it had been tagged as WP:A7).--Bbb23 (talk) 00:22, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay fine, I mean that this person authored The Starmer Project and writes for the New Left Review along with his columns makes him quite notable in my eyes but I'll go through the information mentioned Oneequalsequalsone (talk · contribs) 00:25, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

who is that user you linked? MrBauer24 (talk) 00:28, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I dont understand. What do you mean by user? Oneequalsequalsone (talk · contribs) 00:29, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oliver Eagleton (July 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Doesn't look like he's notable outside of the book at this time, so biographical details can be added to that article. I'll create a redirect from his name to the book.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oliver Eagleton and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 02:22, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oneequalsequalsone! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! asilvering (talk) 02:22, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Democracy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page State power. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]