Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2020/11

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2020

01 November 2020

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:45, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. (for the bot) MelanieN (talk) 18:42, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Similar disruption by IP as with Birsa Munda Airport which was semi'd.  LeoFrank  Talk 02:17, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:14, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
LeoFrank, MelanieN, I placed a range block. Drmies (talk) 22:15, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent, empty edit warring by shifting IP editor to change consensus content in the lede. [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. Calton | Talk 02:36, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Semi Protect it with the description "white nationalist" instead of "neo-nazi" as that is more consistent with sources and following the policy on biographies of living persons. I have not engaged in an edit war such as Calton has since there is an exception of edit warring if the article is a violation of the policy on biographies of living persons, which the article is with the description "neo-nazi". 220.253.68.29 (talk) 04:20, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the source says "neo-Nazi troll", no? Drmies (talk) 22:16, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected Drmies (talk) 22:17, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism. The one and only 4thfile4thrank {talk} 02:51, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Drmies (talk) 22:19, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs vandalizing the page over the past two days; violation of NPOV. Two, twicetalk 04:48, 1 November 2020 (UTC) It is not vandalism, it is the TRUTH — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.140.58.103 (talk) 05:03, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected And I'll block this IP as well. Drmies (talk) 22:21, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Full Protection: Edit warring has been going on throughout today. There needs to be protection for a while so the discussion can take place and an understanding reached. NoahTalk 23:14, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I have also issued warnings to both of the participants. MelanieN (talk) 21:15, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Everytime the (rather short) protection template expires on this article, disruption resumes once again. HistoryofIran (talk) 00:46, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:18, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IP hopper in 49.xxx range since beginning of September. Prexinborou (talk) 01:59, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:25, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalized seven times as of today. ----Rdp060707 (Your questions?/My fight against the devil) 10:17, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 18:53, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It's that time of year again. Ionmars10 (talk) 15:09, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:00, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been subject of frequent vandalism by one IP user who insists on using unique terms. User was range-blocked for 3 months on August 1. Block ended today and they went right back to the article to make similar changes. Blocking admin said to make another report if it continues See here. List of previously affected pages and likely future targets on the talk page here. I reverted the one edit so far, and while its not at 3RR yet, prior history does not lead to an expectation of change, especially given they returned the same day of a 3 month block. RedPatchBoy (talk) 16:26, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Again! Favonian (talk) 16:43, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporapy extended confirmed protection: Disruptive editing and unsourced content adds by an autoconfirmed user. D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 19:26, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator EdJohnston. He put it under semi-protection; let's give that a chance to work. MelanieN (talk) 18:40, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Will be used in Template:Infobox station. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 22:18, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitelyMelanieN (talk) 18:44, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: See last request. After protection expired, it took only a week for disruptive IPs to reappear. Please actually make it indefinite this time. Thank you. ili (talk) 22:49, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC protection appears to have worked pretty well. MelanieN (talk) 18:51, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:25, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 15:49, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction in protection level: From semi-protection. The rationale at WP:SEMI does not seem to currently apply to this page. The article has been quiet. The protecting administrator has declined. 2601:243:2200:60E:D0C9:C5D3:6655:BA57 (talk) 17:56, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I declined due to rationale on my talk page: (a) this has been a troublesome article, (b) the IP declines to use any stable identity, so we don't know what they've done in the past. EdJohnston (talk) 19:15, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
In regards to "(b)", registration is not a requirement to edit Wikipedia, and WP:AGF states "[w]hen dealing with potential breaches of policy, administrators should assume good faith when dealing with the parties. Editors should not be assumed to have breached policy; rather, evidence to that effect should be produced." If I were to register an account now, it would still not address that concern since registration does not give editors access to view contributions that occurred prior to registration. 2601:243:2200:60E:D0C9:C5D3:6655:BA57 (talk) 19:22, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Under the light of your comments which you have left on the Al-Ahbash talk page as well as your current edit to the Abdullah_al-Harari, it is quite obvious that you are not here to do any "constructive expansion" of the Al-Ahbash or any other Al-Ahbash related page but to push the very same agenda of sanitizing the Al-Ahbash which has been pushed for the past almost 2 decades now by hook or by crook. Thanks, but no thanks.  McKhan  (talk) 22:39, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Your comment may be an instance of projection, given that the article looked like this when you created it, you've asserted ownership since then, and you've been involved in nearly every edit war occuring on this article and related articles. 2601:243:2200:60E:D0C9:C5D3:6655:BA57 (talk) 22:49, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You seem to be back since this edit. You can twist the Wikipedia guidelines all you want to fit to your agenda. The fact remains that I am not the sole editor who has been contributing to the Al-Ahbash page. There have been many other editors (i.e. @Softlavender:, @MezzoMezzo:) too. The truth of the matter is that the current version of the Al-Ahbash page is a huge compromise (i.e. RfC about Al-Ahbash and Al-Azhar) despite all the attempts made by the Al-Ahbash to push their POV on Al-Ahbash for almost 2 decades by hook or by crook.  McKhan  (talk) 23:08, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Seems like you "got me," but I've already indicated that I'm the same editor. What is needed for this page is not page protection but a topic-ban for the above user. 2601:243:2200:60E:D0C9:C5D3:6655:BA57 (talk) 23:11, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
What you need to understand is that the topic of Al-Ahbash is very much contentious and controversial. I know very well that why the Al-Ahbash keep coming back to Al-Ahbash related pages on Wikipedia. It is NOT about respect for Al-Azhar or academic integrity, original research, sources, Wikipedia, its guidelines or anything else. It is basically all about marketing.
They keep coming back to the the Al-Ahbash related pages on Wikipedia because these are the pages which shows up on most of the search results on Google, Yahoo and other major search engines. Thus, it is very important for the Al-Ahbash to keep all good, positive and sanitized information being posted about themselves and their scholar Abdullah_al-Harari on Wikipedia in order to make sure that they are able to keep/retain their current adherents as well as recruit potential adherents.
That's where having the "affiliation" with Al-Azhar or using the banner of "Jamat Ahal Wa Sunnah" becomes handy and important because Al-Azhar being one of the oldest Sunni Institution and Jamat Ahl Wa Sunnah being the majority of the World Muslims being Sunnis can really be good for marketing and to buy the clout and legitimacy. Otherwise, the Al-Ahbash couldn't care less about Al-Azhar or Jamat Ahal Wa Sunnah or the mainstream Sunni Muslims.
Each and every thing or word in Al-Ahbash or Abdullah_al-Harari articles have been discussed over and over and over again. You are not brining anything new to the table.
And last but not least, what you also need to understand is that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a party between the Al-Ahbash and other (i.e. Whabis, Salafis) nor it is a promotional blog belonging to the Al-Ahbash where they can publish whatever they deem suitable or appropriate about themselves and/or their scholar Abdullah_al-Harari. What is needed here the most that the people like you to stop pushing their agenda (i.e. POV) on Al-Ahbash and other Al-Ahbash related pages using various IDs and rotating IP addresses. Thank you.  McKhan  (talk) 23:45, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Your early edits to this article very clearly indicate that it seems to be you who is at the article to push an agenda, so it's obvious why you would assume that of every new editor who comes to the page. I'm not affiliated with Al-Ahbash, and I've laid out very clear arguments on the talk page regarding a statement you insist on keeping in the article. Let's stick to discussing the content. If we can't reach an agreement, I'm happy to request third-party opinions and use Wikipedia's dispute processes. 2601:243:2200:60E:D0C9:C5D3:6655:BA57 (talk) 23:55, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
One's edits and persistence speak louder than what someone claims. If you are not affiliated with the Al-Ahbash or proponent of them then why do you keep coming back after years and using the very same arguments and points which the typical Al-Ahbash folks and their proponents have been using for years, using various IDs, and rotating IP addresses, just like you. You had no answer to my above-mentioned comments either. Your "clear arguments" are a tantamount to beating around the bush as they have not only been discussed before over and ever again but also gone through an RfC. I will let the admins decide. Thank you.  McKhan  (talk) 00:15, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I haven't "come back" with the "same arguments" at all. I've suggested that a statement be removed from the lead given that the lead is a summary per MOS:LEAD, suggested that the lead could use some mention of criticism or controversy surrounding the Al-Ahbash, and laid out my reasoning for why a statement that you insist on keeping in the article is a violation of WP:NOR, which is something that doesn't seem to have been addressed before regarding that content. 2601:243:2200:60E:D0C9:C5D3:6655:BA57 (talk) 00:23, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
As per these edits (here, posted 2 years, 1 month, 11 days ago, here and here) as well as a lengthy discussions over the years over the same points (You are welcome to visit the Al-Ahbash talk page and read the discusssions.), I see the same underlying theme and agenda of getting rid / overturning of RfC. Thank you.  McKhan  (talk) 02:09, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Right, RfC's can certainly be overturned with previously unconsidered arguments or changed circumstances. Again, see WP:CCC. 2601:243:2200:60E:D0C9:C5D3:6655:BA57 (talk) 03:02, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Under the light of your old and recent edits as well as the edits done by the Al-Ahbash folks and their proponents using various IDs and rotating IPs, you are simply here to push Al-Ahbash's years' old agenda of getting rid of the neutral statement of "The AICP claims to run its Islamic schools in affiliation with Al-Azhar, a claim which has been denied by Al-Azhar." and sanitize this article and other Al-Ahbash related articles as per their promotional material as it hurts their marketing and financial bottom-line. And the way you are talking and keep on referring to RfC and twisting the other Wikipedia guidelines, it seems that you have done your "homework" of canvassing and fully prepared. This will not be the first nor the last time that the Al-Ahbash are trying to have their way on Wikipedia. I will let the editors and admins see through it.  McKhan  (talk) 03:26, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined. The lengthy exchange demonstrates that the time has not come for protection of this article to be lifted. Favonian (talk) 15:37, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent but slow-moving edit war going on for months over whether to include the subject's recent addressing of controversial comments, with the material mostly being removed by various IPs (e.g. [7], [8]). YorkshireLad  ✿  (talk) 15:10, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I'm leaving this up in case another admin wishes to act, but I note that an editor tried to open a discussion about this issue in September, but has yet to be answered. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 23:14, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Given the repeated attempts by new or unregistered editors to remove longstanding sourced content, and lack of discussion at the talk page, I'm installing PC protection. If consensus to remove the material is reached at the talk page, the protection can be undone. MelanieN (talk) 18:36, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. The one and only 4thfile4thrank {talk} 14:49, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. ‑Scottywong| [verbalize] || 16:52, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This needs to be semi-protected for a while for continued BLP violations. I'd do it myself, but the version I just reverted to is mine, so to speak, after removal of a bunch of Twitter- and YouTube- and self-sourced stuff. Note the revdeletions in the history. Drmies (talk) 15:25, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 15:48, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:00, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - This is the featured article today. See Wikipedia:Main Page featured article protection. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:09, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The template at the top of that page states that it is a "former Wikipedia guideline, no longer backed by community consensus" - so what's the current consensus? PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 14:20, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
According to this discussion, more or less deprecated I guess? Personally, I'd set the bar a little higher for protection on the TFA, but I would imagine TFAs get regularly protected as they'd be the most prominent lightning rod for lazy, casual vandalism/test edits. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:31, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ohnoitsjamie: I believe the nomination of articles as TFA will increase amount of IP vandalism, so page protection would be necessary. 180.244.123.24 (talk) 18:57, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I would have semi-ed it at the time this nomination was made. But now I see it has been an hour and a half since the last vandalism edit, so I guess we leave it alone? -- MelanieN (talk) 23:03, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, seems to have stopped--Ymblanter (talk) 12:31, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pace seems to have slowed slightly since last round of protection but it certainly hasn't stopped. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 14:44, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:48, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction in protection level: From semi-protection. There doesn't appear to have been any vandalism in the past decade. The protecting administrator is inactive. 207.161.86.162 (talk) 01:04, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. This is too obvious a target for schoolboy vandalism to be unprotected. The absence of vandalism merely indicates that the semi-protection works as intended. Favonian (talk) 16:13, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Wouldn't that be a preemptive measure? WP:SEMI provides that "Semi-protection should [not] be used as a preemptive measure against vandalism that has not yet occurred". The article appears to have been vandalized only 4 times over the course of 14 years (and all 4 instances were more than a decade ago). 207.161.86.162 (talk) 18:26, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
IP 207....162, did you not read User:Favonian's explanation? Do you do anti-vandalism work? Do you have anything other than an aspirational argument for why in a perfect world we'd never have to protect articles like this? I assure you that the second this article is unprotected, it will be descended on by every eleventh-grader in the English-speaking world, for starters. Please be realistic and don't argue just for the sake of arguing, which is what your objection absolutely appears to reflect. - Julietdeltalima (talk) 16:50, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 15:39, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive edits by new users and ips, many unsourced claims along with unconstructive edits. Some users are blocked also. The page needs a temporary ECP for atleast a month until the league starts. Drat8sub (talk) 10:10, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:40, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is being actively and repeatedly vandalized through removal of relevant and properly sourced information. Ezlev (talk) 22:30, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only one editor has been causing the disruption and they have been blocked. -- LuK3 (Talk) 23:23, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 01:35, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:25, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent block evasion and sockpuppetry through alternative IPs and accounts. Tayi Arajakate Talk 16:28, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 23:32, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP's have started repeatedly adding erroneous intensity figures that inflate Typhoon Goni's intensity. Before saying "insufficient activity to justify protection", note that this is an emerging event and this kind of vandalism is very likely to continue. Jasper Deng (talk) 20:14, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. by me above. MelanieN (talk) 00:34, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. S0091 (talk) 23:15, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 23:31, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Articles with current storm information on Typhoon Goni (2020)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Insertion of data from incorrect source (JTWC) instead of official source (JMA, RSMC Tokyo) by multiple IPs and a few SPAs. Chlod (say hi!) 14:14, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Non-administrator comment:This is real reason please protect this Article Dam222 (talk) 15:09, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Applies to 2020 Pacific typhoon season. Typhoon Goni is already protected. MelanieN (talk) 23:06, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – In June a podcast apparently encouraged its fans to vandalize this article - every edit since then has been to insert a mention of this podcast, or to revert the same. Please give this a nice lengthy semiprotection so their fan base has a chance to forget about this. MrOllie (talk) 16:15, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Given the consistent vandalism over several months I do feel 3 months is warranted. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 23:20, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. An increase for the next week or so would probably be helpful. KidAd talk 22:54, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 23:07, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

02 November 2020

Indefinite Semi-protection: Persistent removal of content by IPs after just 4 hours after Page Protection ended. Page was before protected, because of vandalism Sockpupetry and disruptive editing in last days by IP-hopping editors. This is the thrid time I request page protection on that article. Because after it ends, IPs again disrupt. Mr.User200 (talk) 20:02, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of Indefinite, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 19:42, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent vandalism/edit wars. Swil999 (talk) 08:12, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 19:55, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated IP blanking. Just plain Bill (talk) 13:18, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 17:02, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, WP:LP violations. This needed protection long ago. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:04, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I declined protection yesterday, see Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Rolling archive#Rabiya Sundall Mateo (I don’t know why the bot hasn’t flagged this), but any other admin is welcome to take another look and re-evaluate. -- MelanieN (talk) 22:10, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for BLP by LuK3 earlier today Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 19:29, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. GizzyCatBella🍁 23:53, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GeneralNotability (talk) 19:21, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit-warring by IP user. Areaseven (talk) 14:15, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:45, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Rangeblocked 85.31.136.0/21. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:54, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: repeated IP vandalism. Adam Dent (talk) 14:11, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.2600:1004:B052:E994:DDF6:7146:6B20:4CF6 (talk) 15:13, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ST47. Favonian (talk) 17:02, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This page appears to have pending changes protection on it, however this page is also semi-protected. Can someone remove the pending changes protection as it just makes the page history blue, and it isn't useful here. Thanks. Terasail[Talk] 17:19, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Favonian (talk) 17:23, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – 대우건설,start at August. MCC214#ex umbra in solem 10:56, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. But if it continues with newer accounts, definitely re-report. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:25, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from many editors - I think this is to do with some upcoming beauty pageant. KylieTastic (talk) 11:52, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:26, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ----Rdp060707 (Your questions?/My fight against the devil) 12:25, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:25, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 17:33, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. The existing indefinite PC protection seems to be doing the job. MelanieN (talk) 00:36, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This IP has been vandalizing Tenoroon. StaceyDebb (talk) 00:34, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Materialscientist (talk) 10:05, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 03:15, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 09:47, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – One month of New York IPs' attempts to add a supposed 24-year-old personal and legal scandal to the page of the current Attorney-General of the Republic of Singapore [9] [10] [11]. Claims are that this is public knowledge and widely reported, but after a month of this most of the sources provided do not mention him by name (e.g., the clipping circulating in legal circles). The best so far (and I don't think it is sufficient) is a something by The Online Citizen discussing a viral message about the incident, which The Online Citizen "understands" to concern Wong. Meters (talk) 03:29, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:20, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Roller26 (talk) 10:29, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:18, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Roller26 (talk) 10:49, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:16, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – 대우건설, Persistent vandalism - Some IP vandal,start at October too. MCC214#ex umbra in solem 10:53, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:19, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Roller26 (talk) 10:55, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:24, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dee03 19:17, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 10:40, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing and edit warring by Newly created accounts. Possible Sockpuppet accounts. Mr.User200 (talk) 19:40, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:11, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. KidAd talk 21:24, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:13, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continual changes of "John" to "Bruz" or similar by various IP's. Was protected from March 2000 to September but the problem has restarted since then. Fleet Lists (talk) 23:10, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:14, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Larry Hockett (Talk) 23:37, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Gfoley4. Materialscientist (talk) 09:45, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ----Rdp060707 (Your questions?/My fight against the devil) 03:40, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 10:03, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: The article has been vandalized several times in the past months by an IP hopping vandal. -WayKurat (talk) 05:42, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 10:03, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 09:22, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 10:00, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Low volume but persistent vandalism/disruptive edits since Oct 16, 2020. Cassiopeia(talk) 23:57, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 09:14, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This is a joke game that is being vandalized a lot, and I don't expect it will stop soon. RedPanda25 01:33, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 09:16, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. ANDROS1337TALK 03:18, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 09:29, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mass attack. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 22:23, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. MelanieN (talk) 18:47, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:27, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. The current indefinite semi-protection seems to be working. Several of the recent vandals have been blocked.  MelanieN (talk) 18:56, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Unregistered users selectively update the subscriber counts every single day. - Ivanacccp (talk) 17:25, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [talk] || 05:02, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:49, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blockedMelanieN (talk) 00:05, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for full protection

Indefinite full-protection: No reason to change the first example, and creating the red link example will "fix" the broken redirect, which should not be fixed in this case. Ituafmq (talk) 15:54, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. This applies to WP:Red link example and prevents anyone from creating it. MelanieN (talk) 00:19, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined. This applies to WP:Example of a broken redirect. No evidence of a need to protect it. MelanieN (talk) 00:19, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent disruption by some IP range. Wario-Man (talk) 18:59, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blockedMelanieN (talk) 01:21, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Current events mean this page is being subjected to abuse. GPinkerton (talk) 05:34, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only three recent instances of vandalism. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 22:56, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Steven (Editor) (talk) 06:56, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Ronalddilanger (talk · contribs) blocked by caknuck. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 23:00, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Currently pending changes protected, but it doesn't seem to be cutting it; no constructive edits by non-autoconfirmed users in sight. Blablubbs (talkcontribs) 19:17, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. The article is too heavily edited for PC to work effectively. MelanieN (talk) 01:25, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection. CLCStudent (talk) 17:17, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:31, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP range adding unsourced contend, replacing sourced content. Here, here, here, here, here. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:56, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator MaterialscientistMelanieN (talk) 00:37, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. NedFausa (talk) 00:11, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE ATTEND. It's getting intense. NedFausa (talk) 00:28, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:39, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:05, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:58, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:29, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sudden rush of vandalism in the last few hours. MelanieN (talk) 00:04, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:21, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:11, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:23, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:13, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. –MJLTalk 17:10, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator DrmiesMelanieN (talk) 00:20, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full-protection: High level of vandalism by anonymous as well as some registered users. Vibhss (talk) 03:53, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Full protection is not called for. Let's see what semi-protection can do. MelanieN (talk) 23:33, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive edits by IPs (possible sock of banned user User:Showbiz826). The range has been partially blocked from many Rajput-related articles. The IP replaces existing sources and sourced content with their own preferred content without any discussion. See [12], [13]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:07, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:40, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same pattern of disruptive editing resumed shortly after expiry of previous protection. William Avery (talk) 09:22, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:43, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs and various use-and-throw users of obvious sockfarm User:Jagdeep singh bittu keep on adding images without proper copyright info. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:20, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging Materialscientist who blocked the sockpuppeteer. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:22, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator MaterialscientistMelanieN (talk) 23:44, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: this article is a redirect. In the past 24h, three editors have vandalized the redirect by putting the same content on the page, while removing the redirect. ([14], [15], [16]) One editor even copy and pasted from the draft article. All these editors are autoconfirmed or extended confirmed, so I think pending changes protection would be the best. D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 13:36, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pending change protection wouldn't help; neither would semi-protection or extended confirmed.  MelanieN (talk) 23:50, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:03, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. The protection log shows almost continuous semi-protection for many years. MelanieN (talk) 23:54, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

03 November 2020

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nearly every change to this page during its 17-year history has been either vandalism or someone reverting vandalism. Ormewood (talk) 16:41, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Woody (talk) 21:22, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism within the past month. Most likely due to the current war with Armenia. --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 20:52, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Woody (talk) 21:29, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. El Millo (talk) 21:13, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:28, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Also related to 2020 United States presidential election, which IP would adding unsourced content once the results published. See some pages that IP vandalized [17], [18] 36.76.239.33 (talk) 21:21, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:27, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – SpencerCollins213447 came back again. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 17:24, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:05, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP vandalism resumed almost immediately after protection was lifted. CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 18:18, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week , after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:04, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nearly every edit to this page has been either vandalism or someone reverting vandalism. Maineartists (talk) 19:54, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:02, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ips keep changing date of birth, height, name, age, and anything else they can get their hands on. Ghinga7 (talk) 19:59, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:01, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated addition of unsourced content and unreliable sources by multiple IP users. LSGH (talk) (contributions) 01:32, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. ‑Scottywong| [communicate] || 06:39, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:24, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 15:01, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:33, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I see one vandalism revert in the last several months. Am I missing something? OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:36, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[[19]] too. CLCStudent (talk) 14:38, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
There were more reverts on 11/3. CLCStudent (talk) 14:38, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. But re-report if there's a bunch more as his death remains in the news. GoodnightmushTalk 15:04, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Prolix 💬 13:07, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [babble] || 15:34, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Election related vandalism. User:Namiba 13:52, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GeneralNotability (talk) 13:58, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:54, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [prattle] || 15:37, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Firestar464 (talk) 04:20, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Unless I'm missing something, that page hasn't been recreated since 2015. ‑Scottywong| [gossip] || 06:41, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Renamer note: User was renamed. Redirected page to new username. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:55, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by multiple IPs, typically changing the pronouns used to be contrary to those used in media referencing the subject. Perryprog (talk) 14:16, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GeneralNotability (talk) 14:22, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Sandbox got auto-protected after it was accidentally used in Template:Service awards. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:28, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected GeneralNotability (talk) 14:16, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Sandbox got auto-protected after it was accidentally used in Template:Service awards. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:28, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected GeneralNotability (talk) 14:16, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Protection: Persistent IP and newly created accounts vandalism. Please protect Joseph Safra's, his father's Jacob Safra and his brothers' Edmond Safra and Moise Safra pages permanently. IP users and newly registered users created accounts continue to change their nationality from Lebanese to Syrian or to Syrian Lebanese, or changing their place of birth or ancestry even after primary sources have been provided both on their pages and their talk pages that clearly state all of them are Lebanese by nationality just like their father not Syrian nor both. Their father was born in Aleppo but their father's official documentation as well as all the three brother's official documentation proves they all had Lebanese nationality not Syrian. All of the brothers were born in Beirut, Lebanon as proven by the official documentation.

Because only someone whose father is Lebanese can obtain nationality, Joseph Safra's grandfather had to be Lebanese as well as per the Lebanese law so the Syrian ancestry of the Safra family has not really been proven by official documentation and there are reliable sources that say the family is originally a sephardic family from Northern Lebanon, not Syria. All of that is explained in the each one of the family members Talk Page. A note was added a while ago on the respective part of their wikibios about not changing their nationality, ancestry nor place of birth and pointing to Talk Page for evidence/sources/discussion but the notes are being constantly disregarded.Chris O' Hare (talk) 18:20, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ‑Scottywong| [confess] || 06:29, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: -subject is involved in a scandal in Sweden. Already defamatory comment added and removed. --BabbaQ (talk) 23:08, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ‑Scottywong| [babble] || 06:31, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Random change/deletion of content by IPs in the last 24h. One has been blocked, the second one continues. Austronesier (talk) 09:14, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:51, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content (contrary to the provided source) from random IP addresses in the same address range, presumably by the same user. Stadscykel (talk) 16:44, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [verbalize] || 06:26, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP trying to re-add unsourced assertions despite multiple warnings, with personal attacks. Nate (chatter) 01:21, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also rangeblocked the IP that was edit warring. ‑Scottywong| [chat] || 06:36, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring. SMB99thx my edits 04:42, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [yak] || 06:44, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Elmssuper 04:46, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Content has finally been sourced. However, there does seem to be heightened interest from a handful of IPs making disruptive edits. Elmssuper 04:52, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [verbalize] || 06:46, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of IP vandalism changing his height in the recent days. Etzedek24 (I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 05:58, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [confess] || 06:49, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Preferably until before the season starts. Babymissfortune 16:49, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 01:38, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 23:00, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I can't agree Larry, a lot of effort by several editors was made in order to improve the article and it would be unfair to the time invested just to undo everything because of 1 IP vandalism (the same guy was present on numerous pages and had several IP adresses banned) and whitewashing which continues. [20] Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 21:32, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It's difficult for me to pinpoint the last stable version of the article, in such a way that everyone would agree with me, so I'll leave it to you to find the correct revision to revert to. ‑Scottywong| [gossip] || 05:02, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed protection: Edit warring on an BLP article between autoconfirmed users. Tayi Arajakate Talk 08:20, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Use this time to start a discussion on the talk page and come to a consensus about this content dispute. ‑Scottywong| [gossip] || 06:21, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This is a TFA that after a hour it posted, 2 IPs had vandalize the article. 36.76.239.33 (talk) 01:48, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined no longer TFA. I think the threat has passed. Airplaneman (talk) 00:53, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Edgenuity has been getting IP vandalism, either in good faith edits saying why its bad or just vandalism in general. I believe it should be semi-protected, until the COVID-19 pandemic is over. Le Panini (Talk tome?) 14:32, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Airplaneman (talk) 01:10, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical cyclone naming and talk page

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated disruptive editing by probable sockpuppet accounts. TornadoLGS (talk) 23:26, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. PC protection looks fine for the main article for now. There's only been a few instances of sockpuppetry the past few days which have been quickly reverted. Please re-report if activity picks up. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:55, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 00:59, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Airplaneman (talk) 01:08, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – User 34syd4t4 constantly removing the redirect despite they were reverted by two different users. GSS💬 13:30, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @GSS: Semi-protection will not prevent an autoconfirmed user from editing the page. If the 3 revert rule is violated, a block may be issued. Airplaneman (talk) 00:34, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:34, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Airplaneman (talk) 00:49, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – User User:Binksternet has engaged in edit warring and will not respect the consensus on this page's talk page. LongIslandThomist914 (talk) 17:09, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Airplaneman (talk) 00:48, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Preferably until before the season starts. Babymissfortune 16:48, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:37, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 01:05, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 01:06, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Elizium23 (talk) 01:34, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 02:30, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Larry Hockett (Talk) 01:59, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 02:27, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Roller26 (talk) 11:00, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 00:40, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated alteration of dates by similar IPs.Slatersteven (talk) 13:44, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 00:50, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Continual vandalism after every match that he referees. Racingmanager (talk) 16:15, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Racingmanager: I hear ya on the request for indefinite semi-protection. I'm hesitant to go that far, given how we treat other articles with similar patterns of vandalism (which we don't indefinitely protect, I think). Happy to discuss this further, of course. Airplaneman (talk) 00:38, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Sockpuppetry. Nathan2055talk - contribs 21:28, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Airplaneman (talk) 00:43, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Roller26 (talk) 10:58, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 00:17, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. BlameRuiner (talk) 11:24, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 00:18, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: For the past month (September 26th - Ongoing), a shifting IP editor has been adding unsourced material to the article. Sources have been repeatedly requested for their additions and multiple notices/warnings have been left on their talk page (26th September: User_talk:109.125.162.131; 14th October: User_talk:46.209.177.212; and today User_talk:5.202.225.71) to provide sources. The editor has been completely unresponsive. Mr rnddude (talk) 18:30, 2 November 2020 (UTC) Additional comment: One of the other editors involved in the subject area has confirmed that the IP has edited at Julia Maesa, Septimius Severus and Julia Domna (already protected for an unrelated dispute). The edits at Maesa date back to Mid-July and a couple edits to Septimius Severus on September 27th. It's the same individual, as identifiable from their writing ability. Mr rnddude (talk) 18:54, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator JzG. Airplaneman (talk) 00:30, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WaddlesJP13 (talk) 21:48, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator JzG. Airplaneman (talk) 00:25, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Scott The Woz IP vandalism. O.N.R. (talk) 20:53, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done, not  really enough vandalism in the last couple of weeks to warrant PP. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 19:47, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Misinformation being persistently added by more than one IP address. Anywikiuser (talk) 16:41, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Since the vandalism was all from one IP range I don't think protection is warranted, but please make a new request if other IPs join in. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:37, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – All the edits over the past 24 hours seem to have been targeted vandalism from different IPs and new users. —oscitare (talk | contribs) 19:08, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:23, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

04 November 2020

Semi-protection: IP edit warring over past month. Article has a long history of this disruptive editing and was previously protected. Garuda28 (talk) 05:14, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:58, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Abusive page moves during an AFD: see also WP:ANI#User:Miggy72. Captain Calm (talk) 13:57, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 16:51, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection:This article is create protected, however its an article of a prominent Ghanaian investment banker that deserves a Wikipedia article. I came across a draft Draft:Ian Greenstreet version and upon checking the history it seemed to have been created and deleted about 3 times in the past due to the fact that the article was created using marketing language and not a notable subject. As mentioned the individual is notable in Ghana and having him on Wikipedia will serve readers who seek such information. Lastly I have checked the current draft and am pretty sure its rid of all marketing language.--Flixtey (talk) 12:21, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Fixed spelling, added required template and, finally, ping HJ Mitchell – the protecting admin Favonian (talk) 14:04, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Already unprotected by administrator HJ Mitchell. Favonian (talk) 17:19, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Mohanad Kh (talk) 23:15, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 16:12, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 01:30, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator GorillaWarfare. Favonian (talk) 16:13, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. (CC) Tbhotch 16:35, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:44, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsupported stats, synth interpretation of existing ones. Failure to engage in talk page discussion despite other users laying out detailed criticism and explanation of why edits are erroneous. Mutt Lunker (talk) 10:15, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 15:25, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:37, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 15:21, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:37, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 15:22, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:40, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 15:23, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: Heavy vandalism after Protect expired October 30th.2600:1004:B06E:19A7:F4F7:1732:5952:6E0D (talk) 15:16, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 15:20, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection:. Because semi-protection proved to be unsuccesfull, new created accounts continue to make disruptive reverts on other editors edits. Here on Ekograff and here. Another new account doing the same here. Mr.User200 (talk) 17:17, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Its TheWahrsager and JamalGold.Mr.User200 (talk) 18:18, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, should be TheWahrsager and JamalGold (probably same person). I'm a decade-old editor, not a newly-created account, and was myself reverted by JamalGold (now blocked). I see you already corrected and reported TheWahrsager so thank you 36.76.239.33. EkoGraf (talk) 23:30, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Woody (talk) 21:27, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Woody (talk) 21:27, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite sysop-protection User request Naleksuh (talk) 03:08, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. I think you meant to request create protection, but the same decline applies. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 03:18, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Ivanvector: It's my understanding that what you linked applies to things such as mainspace/project space/etc, and that user pages or its subpages may be protected at user request (with obvious exemptions such as user talk pages), and do not need to have been vandalized for that. It's often common for sysops to protect their own user pages when they have not been vandalized at all under that same rationale. And yes, what does apply here is create-protection, since my user page does not exist. Is there a seperate venue for that as well? It was my understanding that it is done through here. Naleksuh (talk) 04:42, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: FreeRangeFrog is a former admin. StaceyDebb (talk) 20:43, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. The protecting admin having retired is not a reason to change protection. Guy (help! - typo?) 21:00, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Not done – for the bot. Favonian (talk) 06:36, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Multiple IPs have been talking about this living person, so it needs to be protected. StaceyDebb (talk) 19:55, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:22, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Last edit was in October. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:22, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined For the bot (it conflicts with the "Note" template). (CC) Tbhotch 22:12, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Disruptive non-extended confirmed user edit-warrings(Going on for months) and reoccurring vandalism(removal of sourced information). Xerxes931 (talk) 11:48, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Xerxes931: when this protection expires, you'll need to request indefinite semi-protection again. ‑Scottywong| [squeal] || 15:30, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – RobTheGreat454, is vandalizing the article. StaceyDebb (talk) 22:02, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 22:06, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 10:56, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:08, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Content dispute, so I can't favor auto confirmed over not auto confirmed, but yech. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:08, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. For the bot (it conflicts with the "Note" template). (CC) Tbhotch 22:13, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Recurring, recent vandalism. Yeehaw45 (talk) 16:20, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Woody (talk) 21:19, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism over the past few days. Devokewater (talk) 20:54, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 22:21, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

05 November 2020

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Bunch of dynamic IPs are removing sourced content. McSly (talk) 14:22, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 22:23, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors adding fake/scam websites and false information to page. Blacklisting requested, but disruption is current. Ravensfire (talk) 15:17, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Targeting by IP and new accounts, not sure if all of these accounts are sockpuppets or not, but temp semi should protect the page for the duration of the attack. Gsquaredxc (talk) 19:50, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 22:20, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from several IPs, maybe connected to recent activity at Martin Ellingsen. Sjö (talk) 21:24, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 22:17, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 21:48, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:52, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Protection: Persistent IP and newly created accounts vandalism and disruptive edits on the Safra family. A note was added a while ago on the respective part of their wikibios about not changing their nationality, ancestry nor place of birth and pointing to Talk Page for evidence/sources/discussion but the notes are being constantly disregarded.Chris O' Hare (talk) 09:38, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 2001:8F8:1E23:2F47:0:0:0:0/64 rangeblocked. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:55, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:05, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Important redirect. a gd fan (talk) 18:50, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. This redirect was sysop-protected many years ago but a history merge operation dropped it. I've restored it as ECP, which was not available at that time. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:06, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lisztomaniac 09:53, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Ongoing vandalism. Tegel (talk) 11:05, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 15:58, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: continual vandalism by unregistered users at various IP addresses. Phil Bridger (talk) 12:28, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: edit war between an IP, an autoconfirmed user and another autoconfirmed user. D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 01:44, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator EdJohnston. ‑Scottywong| [soliloquize] || 07:10, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Hatchens (talk) 06:28, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. ‑Scottywong| [verbalize] || 07:01, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Hatchens (talk) 06:29, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. ‑Scottywong| [gossip] || 07:01, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs/new users repeatedly adding unofficial results and declaring a winner. ― Tartan357 (Talk) 07:26, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:50, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request unsalting to turn into a redirect to Hank Green#DELETE THIS. OcelotCreeper (talk) 17:09, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Considering that the podcast mentioned in that article is no longer even called "Delete this", this seems like an unnecessary and/or implausible redirect. ‑Scottywong| [talk] || 07:04, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Prolix 💬 10:32, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:56, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: This page has repeatedly been vandalized within the last two days as well as singer Phil Anselmo's page. MetalDiablo666 (talk) 23:39, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 06:57, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs repeatedly adding unofficial results and declaring a winner. ― Tartan357 (Talk) 04:19, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:55, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs repeatedly adding unofficial results and declaring a winner. ― Tartan357 (Talk) 04:19, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:56, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. IP adding an unofficial results and takes the winner, same as other articles. 36.76.239.33 (talk) 06:41, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:56, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – I think this should be downgraded, as I think Cow cleaner 5000 is gone. Also it isn't a controversial topic. 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 18:32, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Seems like a reasonable enough request. The article has been EC protected since 2016, and there doesn't seem to be any disruptive editing in the recent past. If vandalism returns to the article, we can always take it back to EC at any time. ‑Scottywong| [verbalize] || 07:08, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Johnj1995 (talk) 03:18, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Johnj1995: Sorry but more recent problems would be needed to justify protection and there is no explanation on talk. Johnuniq (talk) 01:55, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Addition without references, use diff IP for disruptive editing. Aleenf1 11:39, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Non-admin comment Aleenf1, I see this article is more likely to be semi-protected instead because none of autoconfirmed users that adding unsourced content, just multiple IPs that vandalize the article whose that edit was reverted by autoconfirmed users. Meanwhile, an ECP also intend to have distruptive behavior before, so is more likely a content dispute for me. 36.76.239.33 (talk) 12:01, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm see like he/she only want to stick to its point, insist to make its edit stand. --Aleenf1 12:17, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
While semi-peotect will not do any better, he/she making its threats few days ago, see talk page. --Aleenf1 12:18, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You're just ridicolous: you crying again to get what you want. I explained my reasons: the two broadcasters are in the same situation of Futbol TV and Uzreport for Uzbekistan and you don't want to admit it, so you invented those phantomatic threats and just reverted without any explanation, nothing. It's just too much for you to admit that you're not right just for once, but it's also clear that it's incoherent your position about that table. It's worse than trying to explain it to a child, because what matters for you it's just that your version is better than the ones of everyone else. And the sad thing is that the others here will give you what you want and won't even try to understand or verify what is wrong in that table, because a spoiled child should always get what he wants. Grow up. --37.163.41.239 (talk) 13:25, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined @Aleenf1: Sorry but an admin cannot adjudicate an issue like this. I see comments on article talk, but they are mainly thoughts about other editors. Please start a new section on talk with a brief explanation of what is wrong with the IP's edits. Don't mention the previous history or claims of disruption, just stick to why your revert is desirable. Then give others a couple of days to respond and request protection again if you think it is justifiable. Any chance of involving a wikiproject? Johnuniq (talk) 02:33, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Bryson Johnson (talk) 21:07, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SarahSV (talk) 02:48, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – One user adding tasteless, irrelevant pictures with dubious licences. The Banner talk 00:51, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for now. If I'm reading the history correctly, it seems to have stopped after you issued a warning. Please ask again if it resumes. SarahSV (talk) 01:37, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 01:09, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @CLCStudent: Sorry but there is no explanation on talk and it is not clear which edits are vandalism. Johnuniq (talk) 01:50, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations. Aasim (talk) 01:23, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 04:29, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection Persistent vandalism FeverishAxe0 (talk) 08:52, 4 November 20 (UTC)

Declined @FeverishAxe0: Sorry but someone not familiar with the topic cannot see why the edits are vandalism and the IPs haven't done anything in the last couple of days. Please put a brief explanation on talk and post again if the issue continues. Johnuniq (talk) 01:47, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs repeatedly declaring a winner/adding unofficial results. ― Tartan357 (Talk) 01:30, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:54, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism occuring immediately after previous 2mo protection expired.  Nixinova T  C   01:59, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:53, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. KidAd talk 02:48, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is a content dispute, so I've added full protection. SarahSV (talk) 03:52, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs repeatedly adding unofficial results and declaring a Biden win. ― Tartan357 (Talk) 02:53, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 03:46, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —hueman1 (talk contributions) 11:03, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @HueMan1: I see the problem (slow but long-term disruption) however the article has not been protected before. Please ping me if problems persist. Johnuniq (talk) 02:27, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Johnuniq: Sure, Thanks. —hueman1 (talk contributions) 02:39, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Group of editors is trying to ram through controversial material by brute force edit-warring. Khirurg (talk) 19:26, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:38, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 19:57, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:39, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – New editor attempting to rewrite article while resisting discussion. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:08, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. They will be autoconfirmed soon. Johnuniq (talk) 02:43, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term semi-protection would be appreciated. This company has its head office in Hong Kong. For over a year, IPs have been adding and removing a lot of sources and content, including repeatedly removing that the company is Chinese-owned. One of the IPs adds unnecessary details in one-sentence paragraphs that make the article unreadable. The IPs geolocate to Malaysia, Thailand, Mumbai, and to Hong Kong and Guangzhou in China. Example edit removing 12,197 bytes, geolocating to Hong Kong. SarahSV (talk) 20:30, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:49, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 23:29, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 02:49, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Favre1fan93 (talk) 23:36, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 02:51, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive edits by IPs, which are likely to continue as the 2020 United States presidential election plays out. ― Tartan357 (Talk) 02:42, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:52, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Recently, there has been a significant number of edits that needed to be rolled back. Ajshul 😀 (talk) 17:44, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:34, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Current event, persistent IP vandalism. - Bri.public (talk) 18:15, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:36, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: He is about to become president(-elect) - might want to semi-protect redirect like Joe biden. Nearly but not perfect (talk) 02:18, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Airplaneman (talk) 02:27, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I saw its page history that the edit war is engaged. ----Rdp060707 (Your questions?/My fight against the devil) 08:40, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:07, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. KH-1 (talk) 10:04, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:08, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Original research about a boyfriend persistently added in, primarily by IP addresses, for over two and a half years (that's when I first left a note about it on the talk page). Abbyjjjj96 (talk) 00:21, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 02:19, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 00:50, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 02:14, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Editwarring by sockpuppet. Atlantic306 (talk) 00:51, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Article has not been protected before. Johnuniq (talk) 01:49, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 01:44, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • May I request a significant duration of semi-protection on this article? Of huge concern with the vandalism edits has been continuous defamatory-type edits concerning the character of Gibby in this TV series that has been going on for many months now. MPFitz1968 (talk) 02:47, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 01:52, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 01:49, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 01:53, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 02:21, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 01:54, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An edit war between an IP editor and some SPA editors. power~enwiki (π, ν) 07:18, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I left an explanation at article talk. Johnuniq (talk) 02:04, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~Yahya () • 07:59, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:06, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Conifer (talk) 18:02, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 20:05, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs repeatedly adding unofficial results and declaring a winner. ― Tartan357 (Talk) 01:13, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 01:28, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs repeatedly adding unofficial results and declaring a winner. ― Tartan357 (Talk) 01:18, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 01:29, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs repeatedly adding unofficial results and declaring a winner. ― Tartan357 (Talk) 01:18, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 01:29, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

06 November 2020

Extended confirmed: Some IPs of unknown origin continue to change the occupations of the actor, having that I matched him a little more the opening sentence and the infobox of the others but he or they insist that I or all of us were removing the term voice actor in his person file without having first consulted through the actor's discussion page if the occupation is left or not. 152.0.131.245 (talk) 18:10, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:39, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The IP is blowing up my watchlist and message notification multiple times daily in a slow-mo edit war of which I am not a participant, but contains a ping to me. Even if not reverted, this editor will revert and re-instate the edit theirself. Very, very annoying! Please "Semi-" the page for a week or two to break this editor of their daily habit. Thanks, GenQuest "Talk to Me" 18:53, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@GenQuest: User(s) blocked. 1 month. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:04, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 21:06, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. IP refuses to engage in discussion and has reverted obvious issues such as the Short Description being at the top and reversing an edit which corrected a typo [21]. Have tried to explain on the talk, but IP has reverted all edits in quick succession. Thank you for your consideration. The joy of all things (talk) 15:02, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - we'll see how that goes - David Gerard (talk) 19:22, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by IP hopper. See this for example. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:13, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High-level of unsourced IP edits; person is in the news due to unconfirmed reports of being hired to manage the Boston Red Sox. Dmoore5556 (talk) 16:54, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continued ongoing IP additions of promotional and unsourced information.VVikingTalkEdits 13:26, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:15, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, WP:BLP violations and something akin to death threats following the shooting of a rival. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 17:40, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs perisistantly removing a storm from the "see also" section. IPs vandalizing page as well. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 13:55, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [confabulate] || 15:48, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. NASCARfan0548  15:55, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction in protection level: From full protection to template editor protection or lower. The template is used only on TFA archive pages. See also insource search for transclusions, insource search for all mentions. Protecting admin, Raul654, is inactive since January. —⁠andrybak (talk) 14:40, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. ‑Scottywong| [talk] || 15:53, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated attempts to add unsourced (flaky) material. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:08, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [soliloquize] || 15:39, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Lots of IPs vandalising or adding of unsourced information. The page has 27,207 views (a high number, remember that this page is in the list of popular pages of Spain above some Spanish cities), most of them probably being children who, obviously, do not know how to edit Wikipedia or follow its policies. Super Ψ Dro 10:45, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [comment] || 15:45, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Page which could be subject to IP vandalism. Also, former Prime Ministers also still have semi-protection on them. Jeuno (talk) 11:58, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. ‑Scottywong| [confer] || 15:44, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP disruptive editing through discourteous behavior. Rain Forest (talk) 07:11, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [spill the beans] || 15:24, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs engaging to edit wars. Persistent disruptive editing. —hueman1 (talk contributions) 09:04, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [soliloquize] || 15:16, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism because this person is on a lot of TVs right now. KidAd talk 10:10, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [verbalize] || 15:13, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Cast Changes and Language Changes that were clear indications of vandalism. SP013 (talk) 15:38, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:25, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Most 2020 U.S. election pages are currently at ECP; this one should have at least something. It's at high risk of disruptive editing, etc. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 06:50, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Chetsford (talk) 07:04, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism on a BLP. (t · c) buidhe 13:29, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Reasonable demographic hypotheses suggest that the likely sub-population vandalising the page is similar to those who vandalised Margot (activist). That is currently semi-protected, and I seem to remember that it was fully protected for many weeks. See Talk:Nadia_Oleszczuk#Vandalism analysis for a brief analysis of the recent vandalism, mostly by IPs. Boud (talk) 13:40, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Arab-Israeli Article. 203-109 (Help Desk (for question)) 23:31, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ‑Scottywong| [comment] || 04:52, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs repeatedly adding unofficial results/declaring a winner. ― Tartan357 (Talk) 05:02, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Chetsford (talk) 06:49, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Elizium23 (talk) 06:23, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Chetsford (talk) 06:45, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Yet another round of Scott The Woz vandalism. O.N.R. (talk) 22:42, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ‑Scottywong| [chat] || 04:40, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Elizium23 (talk) 22:49, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ‑Scottywong| [communicate] || 04:42, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 03:50, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism due already ongoing discussion on talkpage for 6 months.Kikkererwtje (talk) 19:01, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – for the bot. Favonian (talk) 06:32, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs/new users repeatedly adding unofficial results/declaring a winner. ― Tartan357 (Talk) 05:07, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 06:47, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Vandalism and unconfirmed information. Election in this district is undeclared and contested, yet several users have attempted to add unverified and uncited information. Additionally, there is some recent vandalism by anonymous users. Maybe semi-protect for a month? XPEric (talk) 05:10, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 06:46, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent Semi-protection: Extensive vandalism by both anonymous and authenticated users. Article has a long history of vandalism, including being protected several times in the past. Vandalism resumed when protection lapsed. XPEric (talk) 05:19, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lisztomaniac 09:34, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:21, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ~ Amkgp 💬 16:34, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Gave user final warning, looks like a case of WP:CIR. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined. The disruptive user has been warned, and in any case they would not be deterred by semi-protection because they are autoconfirmed. MelanieN (talk) 00:27, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit-warring in article the last few days over the death of a contestant (I'm not involved in this dispute). Need protection from IP-hopping editors while the issue is being discussed in talk page. Hzh (talk) 23:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Article is already PC protected. ‑Scottywong| [verbalize] || 04:48, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. User:Namiba 23:58, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. ‑Scottywong| [speak] || 04:53, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Temporary semi while the election is happening. IP vandals have started to attack this page. Gsquaredxc (talk) 01:13, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. ‑Scottywong| [converse] || 04:53, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Because of the election situation, this page has come under much more attention (look at the toolforge pageviews). It has already been vandalized, and more vandalism is likely to come. Curbon7 (talk) 01:24, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2601:140:8700:15a0::/64 (talk · contribs). Please re-report if disruption continues. — Newslinger talk 01:47, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Because of the election situation, this page has come under much more attention (look at the toolforge pageviews). It has already been vandalized, and more vandalism is likely to come. Curbon7 (talk) 01:24, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2601:140:8700:15a0::/64 (talk · contribs). Please re-report if disruption continues. — Newslinger talk 01:47, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by numerous IPs. Egghead06 (talk) 03:20, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [squeal] || 04:57, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: IP editors trying to change the actor's occupation info and others trying to remove his sexuality info. George Ho (talk) 22:38, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [gab] || 02:21, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive commentary about the current election. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 02:16, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:20, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Same as Weekly Shonen Jump. LTA has disappeared for 1 and a half year, and topic in not controversial, so it should be downgraded to semi. 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 17:32, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but do you think the LTA watches the same page for 1 and a half year? He hasn't edited any pages since October 2018.4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 18:55, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The vandal did it for at least six consecutive years, and once they got blocked from it, they continued with other Cat Creek pages. So yes, I assume this person will resume vandalizing it once they realize the page has a lower protection. (CC) Tbhotch 19:21, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined A long-term solution was needed, and it seems to have worked. There's no point in testing it. SarahSV (talk) 22:26, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from several IPs. Sjö (talk) 20:50, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator BishonenMelanieN (talk) 00:43, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 21:50, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:47, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High visibility template, appearing at London#Climate and elsewhere, see protection for {{Chicago weatherbox}}. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 22:36, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitelyMelanieN (talk) 00:49, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs changing sourced area figure 71.62 sq km to unsourced 300 sq km. See [22], [23], [24], [25]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:47, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator LukMelanieN (talk) 00:29, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Hummerrocket (talk) 20:02, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Arbitrarily0MelanieN (talk) 00:32, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Protection: Repeated vandalism/edit war. This isn't even the first time I've requested this page to be protected. MetalDiablo666 (talk) 20:36, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator LukMelanieN (talk) 00:34, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. P-K3 (talk) 20:37, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:36, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: disruptive/non-neutral editing by new users. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 20:41, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:42, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs repeatedly adding unofficial results/declaring a winner. ― Tartan357 (Talk) 20:51, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question: @Tartan357 and Sdrqaz: is there consensus to remove this information? And is this a content dispute, or are the IPs adding obviously problematic material? SarahSV (talk) 22:23, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
SlimVirgin, there is not yet a consensus on how to call these races. IPs are adding projections from various news networks, which are not official results. See Talk:2020 United States Senate elections#Declaration of winners based on AP projections. We will likely apply the consensus determined for calling states in the presidential election, which is still under discussion in this RfC, to the senate races, as well. We aren't calling races yet. Regardless, the IPs are adding winners and vote totals without even citing any sources. They're likely getting that information from a myriad of news projections. ― Tartan357 (Talk) 22:27, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
SlimVirgin, I'm working on properly adding partial results for these races, but adding winners while the discussion about how to do so is ongoing—and without any citations—is obviously problematic. ― Tartan357 (Talk) 22:46, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@SlimVirgin: I don't have much to add besides what Tartan357 has said. The race has been called by the AP and pretty much all news organisations, but there hasn't been a consensus on what standard should be used before a race is called on Wikipedia. Sdrqaz (talk) 23:00, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. IMHO, and per WP:ARBAP2, people should not be edit warring about winners. In the absence of a widely discussed RfC clearly saying that a particular news service is an official source for outcomes, information needs a reliable source. At any rate, that should be discussed somewhere central and if an opinion is reached that the IP edits are good, anyone is of course welcome to remove the protection. Johnuniq (talk) 23:08, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Johnuniq, thanks. Are you saying I'm edit warring (since it usually takes two to edit war)? I'm just trying to keep unreferenced information out and maintain some consistency in how the races are called (not declaring winners myself). Please let me know if you think my reverts have been inappropriate. ― Tartan357 (Talk) 23:15, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Words are tricky, aren't they? I wouldn't read too much into my hasty comment above. Thanks for your work. Johnuniq (talk) 23:17, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs repeatedly adding unofficial results/declaring a winner. ― Tartan357 (Talk) 20:53, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 23:03, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs repeatedly adding unofficial results/declaring a winner. ― Tartan357 (Talk) 20:54, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 23:03, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs repeatedly adding unofficial results/declaring a winner. ― Tartan357 (Talk) 20:56, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 23:02, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism strong enough that admins have to change visibility of edits on talk page. Main article is already protected indefinitely according to page log. Talk page was previously protected but only for one day. I suggest 30 days, given that subject is one of two US presidential candidates and the talk page is likely to be targeted for some time. IHateAccounts (talk) 22:48, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 23:10, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

07 November 2020

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:24, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only two disruptive edits, one of which was only an incomplete stats update. Not enough to warrant protection. Kosack (talk) 19:48, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 18:54, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only one user jumping the gun right now. Kosack (talk) 19:53, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is relatively new and has already been subject to repeated gender-based vandalism from multiple IP users an IP hopper. A recent vandal said the following in the edit summary: "Ban me, i have about 1000 IPs i can use. Have fun.". ezlev signed this. talk 20:32, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:57, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies, my range calculation was off; that's now fixed. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:24, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Non consensus changes and WP:Edit warring.--Joey Camelaroche (talk) 07:51, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:56, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism/disruptive editing related to the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war occurred earlier today from an Azerbaijan IP address, protection would be useful to preempt further such disruptive editing and vandalism. TempestSounds (talk) 08:07, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:59, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:17, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:03, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended-confirmed protection: Many people try to change the vice president to Kamala Harris just before inauguration, I propose i extend confirmed in order to anticipate malicious vandalism from users and IPs at the time of election results and inauguration. 36.76.239.33 (talk) 21:26, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Risker. Extended protected for a week. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:57, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism. Hummerrocket (talk) 18:28, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.. I'd rather avoid full protection if possible, if this is the only issue at this time. -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:35, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-running IP edit war has resumed. O.N.R. (talk) 20:43, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content by a highly disruptive editor from Malaysia (see also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/123.136.107.69). This has been going on for months now. BlueJag (talk) 20:47, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term vandalism by IP hopper. Jalen Folf (talk) 16:43, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 19:08, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Current Today's Featured Article. Darkknight2149 20:10, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Consistent vandalism, disruptive editing, blanking by IP users and new accounts. Article has gotten some attention due to its involvement in the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh warCuriousGolden (T·C) 07:57, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:57, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing on BLP article. Tayi Arajakate Talk 14:52, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:02, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 19:51, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 19:56, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This IP user 2405:201:1F:109C:84F2:E92E:7E50:6F39 continued adding and removing content in this page RadhaKrishn (here), without providing sources or giving an explanations on his edits. So I request either the page should be temporarily protect from his IP address to do any changes or may be block the IP address. Thanks. Mr-5 / (M 📩 ✉ / C🖋 ) 13:40, 7 November 2020 (UTC).[reply]

User(s) blocked. Rangeblocked. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:50, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruption by sockpuppets. FDW777 (talk) 13:52, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:44, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 17:59, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. GorillaWarfare (talk) 18:16, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of back and forth IP vandalism today, for obvious reasons. Pending changes would be fine too, if that's a better option. Whisperjanes (talk) 18:36, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 18:49, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Increasing level of IP vandalism and potential sockpuppet edits. MrEarlGray (talk) 15:48, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 17:34, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 17:53, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: The article is going crazy with everyone trying to add their version to the lead. There is so much edit conflicting it took me eight tries to bring the article back to a neutral version. Would anyone consider a few hours of full protection to let things calm down? -- MelanieN (talk) 17:47, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support - I support this request. Perhaps even more than a few hours might be a better idea though. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 17:52, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected Started with 12 hours, can extend if needed. GorillaWarfare (talk) 18:03, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Another article that has most outdated the infobox and the opening sentence was the article by Adam Gardiner, a voice actor from New Zealand who has participated in numerous series and movies (including Power Rangers) but why did this happen, due to the reversion by part of a recent IP of unknown origin, who did not like my edition because I make a change (see difference of editions here and here), as you will know when you look at the section below of your filmography, it inspired me to match the occupation in the sentence initial and the IP also insists that I or the other IPs continue to remove the occupation in their infobox without having reached a consensus through the discussion page of the article to know whether or not to leave my edit. 152.0.131.245 (talk) 19:10, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

no Declined There have been four recent edits. This doesn't meet any protection criteria. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:13, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with the decline. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:55, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly, I even explained that the IP is violating the policy for making these unnecessary requests over occupations. 2600:1000:B03A:9000:6431:FA62:4069:BF16 (talk) 00:16, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – for the bot. Favonian (talk) 10:46, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Editor furiously inserting unsourced ethnicity claims. GPinkerton (talk) 02:54, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GPinkerton, have you attempted to resolve this on the talk page? Elizium23 (talk) 03:03, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Elizium23: See: User_talk:GPinkerton#Caracalla. GPinkerton (talk) 03:20, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please sign your posts; that is not what I asked. Discussing on a user talk page disenfranchises all other article editors who have watchlisted the article for the purpose of improving it. The article talk page is the proper place to have discussions about article content. Elizium23 (talk) 03:24, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Elizium23: This isn't about article content, it's about user behaviour. GPinkerton (talk) 03:27, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
GPinkerton, does the report you filed not say "content dispute [...] unsourced ethnicity claims."??? Elizium23 (talk) 03:35, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Elizium23: Sure it does, but only if you omit the crucial words "edit warring", which is what this report is about: a Good Article article subjected to POV edit warring and insertion of irrelevant claims. GPinkerton (talk) 03:37, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
GPinkerton, and in the time since you filed this report, have you attempted to begin a discussion on the talk page or have you instead vigorously defended your refusal to do so? Elizium23 (talk) 03:38, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Elizium23: The other editor already did so, and despite your claim no-one had been disenfranchised. Why are you pretending that this is relevant to whether or not the page is protected? It is not. GPinkerton (talk) 03:40, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:05, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and WP:DERRY violations, amplified by the Old Firm football rivalry. FDW777 (talk) 09:53, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:07, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – A week of near constant edit warring and most likely BLP violations. Poorly sourced and not something I know anything about, but one party is likely editing in bad faith. Escape Orbit (Talk) 16:21, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:50, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Appears to be an edit war going on over the controversy section, mainly lead by IP edits. Geoff | Who, me? 16:58, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - The two IP addresses are from the UK. I'm thinking that it's the same user. They added content, then decided to remove it after reviewing the guidelines, as evidenced in the edit summary. Let's hold off for now and keep an eye on things. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:52, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One year semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing and vandalism by 216.15.119.215; with the goal is to jeopardize the roles of Palestine and Italy in the conflict. ZaDoraemonzu (talk) 17:05, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:53, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of WP:COI material. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 20:26, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:02, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:18, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:49, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs declaring a winner and adding incorrect/unsourced content. ― Tartan357 Talk 04:34, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:05, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: BLP policy violations – At least six months of attempts to add unsourced claim about a person relationship by IP-hopper. Restarted immediately after three-month protection ended. Meters (talk) 06:57, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Make that "more than eight months". Here's the identically-worded edit from February: [26] Meters (talk) 07:03, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected--Ymblanter (talk) 07:49, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ----Rdp060707 (Your questions?/My fight against the devil) 07:23, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:45, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Some IPs of unknown origin continue to change the occupations of the actor, having that I matched him a little more the opening sentence and the infobox of the others but he or they insist that I or all of us were removing the term voice actor in his person file without having first consulted through the actor's discussion page if the occupation is left or not. 152.0.131.245 (talk) 18:10, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just to clear things up, the IP user here is clearly violating the Wikipedia policy for making unnecessary removals and unnecessary protection requests over an edit that’s clearly not a big deal to everyone. 2600:1000:B03A:9000:6431:FA62:4069:BF16 (talk) 00:15, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:53, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Some IPs of unknown origin continue to change the occupations of the actor, having that I matched him a little more the opening sentence and the infobox of the others but he or they insist that I or all of us were removing the term voice actor in his person file without having first consulted through the actor's discussion page if the occupation is left or not. 152.0.131.245 (talk) 18:10, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just to clear things up, the IP user here is clearly violating the Wikipedia policy for making unnecessary removals and unnecessary protection requests over an edit that’s clearly not a big deal to everyone. 2600:1000:B03A:9000:6431:FA62:4069:BF16 (talk) 00:15, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:54, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Req. 3 day semi. IP editors routinely adding ignorant, sloppy content, like dead and alive parentheticals in an overview table here and here and here, etc. Or listing every name, nickname and alias a character has had, in that table. This does not seem to be consistent with community editing standards, (consider that if we're going to label one character as "alive", then shouldn't all characters who are alive be labeled that way?). And this is part of a much larger problem across Indian entertainment articles, where editors are inclined to slap labels on everything, use sloppy formatting, parentheticals instead of complete sentences with context, etc. I have it well documented at User:Cyphoidbomb/Campaign of Ignorance. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:57, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:55, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Arbitration enforcement: ARBAA conflict area, recent influx of disruption. Blablubbs (talkcontribs) 19:14, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. A note to Blablubbs: I protected the page under the standard provisions stated on Wikipedia's protection policy. There's no remedy in the linked Arbitration case that calls for discretionary sanctions or special actions due to this being a previous case with ArbCom in 2007. The only actions that came of this were bans and editors being placed under probation. If I'm wrong, please message me on my user talk page and let me know exactly what I missed. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:00, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection under WP:GS/Crypto - this page routinely has the artists in question swinging by to add promotion for themselves citing the crypto press or their own blogs, and another today just put out a call to arms for other self-promoters. Might be worth ECP (under GS/Crypto), but semi would probably head off a lot of it. Thanks :-) - David Gerard (talk) 19:15, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Involving many IPs and a user. (CC) Tbhotch 19:50, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Non-admin comment Tbhotch, This is actually a vandalism and i see only IP that get distruptive behavior, so it more likely semi-protected instead or maybe a block. 36.76.239.33 (talk) 20:37, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Whichever works. (CC) Tbhotch 22:41, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:01, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Donnowin1 (talk) 20:16, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - David Gerard (talk) 22:43, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs declaring a winner/vandalizing page. ― Tartan357 Talk 21:32, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:03, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. (CC) Tbhotch 01:58, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:04, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

08 November 2020

Full protection: Persistent IP vandalism. It's an edit war of this same set of unsourced edits forever. Thanks. — Smuckola(talk) 10:09, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Blocked Special:Contribs/2A00:1FA1:8000:0:0:0:0:0/33 from editing Belarusfilm for 1 month. That range should cover all of the recent IPs editing the page. GorillaWarfare (talk) 19:01, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ----Rdp060707 (Your questions?/My fight against the devil) 12:18, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Vandalism was all coming from Special:Contributions/112.198.170.110, who has been blocked by Widr. GorillaWarfare (talk) 19:03, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent reversions and page instability. Darkknight2149 18:07, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

IMO there is no need for page protection. Edit dispute between me and one other editor, discussing on talk page. Popcornfud (talk) 18:17, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Popcornfud, I thought we were done. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VictimOfEntropy (talkcontribs) 18:58, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Editors indeed appear to be discussing this on the talk page. Re-request if the war resumes. GorillaWarfare (talk) 19:13, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and editing harassment warring. 85.26.233.61 (talk) 19:38, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:31, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page-move vandalism – Offensive vandalism. gnu57 20:45, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Stwalkerster. Favonian (talk) 20:54, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP vandalism - single user constantly vandalizes article LOLCaatz (talk) 13:19, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 19:15, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. RealFakeKimT 18:55, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 19:15, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction in protection level: from full protection to no protection. It is an unused template. —⁠andrybak (talk) 20:09, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think this template is used for the main page when the WP:TFL is part of a WP:FT. (CC) Tbhotch 22:42, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined per Tbhotch's comment. Favonian (talk) 11:44, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Favonian and Tbhotch: please see the insource search. —⁠andrybak (talk) 15:44, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If the template was used, it would have shown up in the TFL archives. —⁠andrybak (talk) 15:52, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected. Deferring to your insight, andrybak. Favonian (talk) 18:52, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
As it turns out, template was used on the Main Page until two months ago. —⁠andrybak (talk) 19:16, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: No need to edit this other than by socks, also WP:DENY. 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 13:49, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected indefinitely. GorillaWarfare (talk) 19:05, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Widely substituted template. HurricaneTracker495 (talk) 15:55, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. GorillaWarfare (talk) 19:07, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism/persistent vandalism and unexplained editing by anonymous user. Apoorva Iyer (talk) 17:08, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 19:09, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 17:46, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. for 2 days. GorillaWarfare (talk) 19:09, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – During the remainder of the NFL season; through the Super Bowl. Peaceray (talk) 17:49, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected until February 14, 2021 (one week after the Super Bowl). GorillaWarfare (talk) 19:11, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 23:31, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi one week Johnuniq (talk) 02:50, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. My confusion, I WP:ECP protected it and I think that was intentional. Johnuniq (talk) 04:30, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 00:02, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 18:57, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Edit warring and non-consensus changes is continue. I insist that the article be semi-protected for the duration of the discussion. Joey Camelaroche (talk) 11:10, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. You are both edit-warring. Start by discussing the matter on Talk:Jane Birkin. Favonian (talk) 11:35, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed: similar situation to the president's page, but no need for full protection here. Mandoto (talk) 18:23, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There are lots of edits but a couple that I checked did not appear to be blatantly bad. Please add three diffs of recent bad edits here to explain why the current indefinite semi-protection needs to be raised to WP:ECP. Johnuniq (talk) 02:10, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Should have pinged Mandoto. Johnuniq (talk) 02:12, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, we seem to be doing ok for the time being, pls renominate if major disruption occurs.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:35, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 18:55, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and full protected move for one week. That is, Second Lady of the United States was protected as it is the current and established title. Johnuniq (talk) 02:26, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. KidAd talk 07:15, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – I don't know what the policy on talk page protection is, but this talk page is being spammed by IPs and relatively new accounts that request the same thing over and over again. I believe that ECP would help more but semi is also fine. Gsquaredxc (talk) 02:00, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would be happier acting if any enthusiasm were shown at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Admin eyes needed at Talk:Joe Biden. At least one recent edit request was good. Thoughts? Johnuniq (talk) 02:49, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm also hesitant to protect the page (and would note that if anything it would be semi-protected, not ECP). But it looks like the majority of the comments there are at least in good faith, if not productive, and the bad-faith ones could just be reverted. GorillaWarfare (talk) 03:15, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Talk pages are generally not protected, and administrators have so far been actively removing inappropriate posts. If we were to protect the talk page, we would need to set up a second page for feedback from IP and non-autoconfirmed editors since the article is indefinitely full protected. That would just be kicking the can down the road since we'd still need to monitor that page for BLP violations and edit requests. Given all that, unless the talk page gets completely out of hand, I don't think protection is correct. Wug·a·po·des 05:05, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Dynamic IP edit warring. Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:11, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, block evasion. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 06:32, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 06:58, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent removal/modification of sourced content and addition of addition of unsourced/unreliable additions. Gotitbro (talk) 21:20, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GorillaWarfare (talk) 03:34, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Due to recent political changes in the US. An instance of IP adding unsourced content. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 01:03, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GorillaWarfare (talk) 03:17, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. KidAd talk 06:26, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:56, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of disruptive/unconstructive edits from one user with multiple IPs/accounts.  StarScream1007  ►Talk  14:27, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 31 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Wug·a·po·des 05:16, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:27, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @CLCStudent: I would protect if there were a discussion on talk showing at least two established editors agreeing that the article should be a certain way. As it happens, I have no idea whether presumptive presidents elect should be added to the list and cannot see vandalism (any clues as to which edits are bad?). Johnuniq (talk) 02:14, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 19:21, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Johnuniq (talk) 02:31, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandals adding US politicians. Gsquaredxc (talk) 01:55, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only two instances of disruption the past week. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:28, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 16:33, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Flix11: Sorry but an uninvolved admin cannot evaluate the recent edits and know why they are vandalism. I'm declining but if the problem continues, please a short section on article talk showing why the edits are wrong and ping me. Then I'll look again. Johnuniq (talk) 02:05, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 16:53, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Flix11: As above (Mauricio Pochettino), I'm declining but if the problem continues, please add a short section on article talk showing why the edits are wrong and ping me. Then I'll look again. Johnuniq (talk) 02:08, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Multiple IPs and new users changing the "far-right" descriptor without consensus or reliable sources Username6892 (Peer Review) 04:47, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Wug·a·po·des 05:07, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pages targeted by LTA

Long-term semi-protection: Repeated patterns of disruption by hordes of WP:LTA/INTSF sockpuppets. —{Canucklehead} 08:20, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see a point with protecting these pages due to one instance of LTA activity. They're just going to move onto other articles, and protecting them would prevent good edits from these kinds of users. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:00, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Singaporean nationality law.
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Other two. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 01:04, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed: many people may try to change it before Biden is officially sworn in office. I propose Extended confirmed protection until the inauguration Jcoolbro (talk) (c) 17:06, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. as an arbitration enforcement action. GorillaWarfare (talk) 17:29, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs recurrently adding unsourced DOB to this BLP. Innisfree987 (talk) 03:57, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – a lot of vandalism. JMHamo (talk) 23:05, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Mattythewhite. GorillaWarfare (talk) 03:34, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent and abusive IP vandalism, yet again. Lilipo25 (talk) 00:26, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 03:32, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated addition of overly detailed in-universe OR content by anonymous editors against consensus. --Finngall talk 00:30, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 03:32, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent template protection: Highly Visible Template. HurricaneTracker495 (talk) 19:06, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @HurricaneTracker495: There are only 19 transclusions and no edits in 21 months. If there is a reason to protect despite that, please explain. Johnuniq (talk) 02:30, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Johnuniq: it has 19 transclusions, but it’s supposed to be substituted. It was probably used over 1000 or so times. HurricaneTracker495 (talk) 02:42, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Template protected indefinitely. @HurricaneTracker495: Good point. Johnuniq (talk) 02:46, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: edit-warring IP repeatedly reverting against multiple editors on article covered by WP:GS/Crypto 1RR rules - David Gerard (talk) 21:20, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @David Gerard: Per your 1RR link I have issued a short semi hoping it doesn't need to be logged. The issue seems to be He has been known as "Bitcoin Jesus" which makes me wonder if the IP has a point, and there is nothing relevant on talk. I'll leave it to you to discuss, but it does seem over-the-top for an uninformed onlooker like me. Johnuniq (talk) 02:42, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. S0091 (talk) 00:49, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 03:18, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Elizium23 (talk) 01:47, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 03:16, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing and addition of "suggestions" which violates WP:FORUM. Johnj1995 (talk) 18:30, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Johnj1995: Please check the IP's other edits. Johnuniq (talk) 02:18, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:36, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:19, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP vandalism has resumed and I’m pretty sure one of the edits may be a BLP violation. CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 20:49, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 23:16, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations – As a transgender man, he is a frequent target for vandals. I doubt that it's going to stop any time soon if at all, so I think that indefinite pending changes will prevent any pronoun based vandalism from being visible. JDDJS (talk to mesee what I've done) 22:55, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent and abusive IP vandalism. KidAd talk 00:19, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Fuzheado. Semi-protected for 1 year. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:23, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

09 November 2020

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Tons upon tons of IPs are making silly edits on the page right now. ★Trekker (talk) 17:58, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 22:19, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Duncan encouraged his followers to get that he likes flowers into Wikipedia [27] and so they are doing just that. Barkeep49 (talk) 18:41, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Czello 21:37, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:45, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: For some reason, this BLP article seems to attract an inordinate amount of drive-by vandalism, as its History shows. -The Gnome (talk) 18:29, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 19:59, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Persistent long term IP vandalism Ed talk! 19:18, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 19:54, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Dosafrog (talk) 19:19, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 19:52, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. (CC) Tbhotch 02:47, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 09:31, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Specifically, the range 5.173.0.0/16 has been blocked from editing the Wałęsa article for one months. Favonian (talk) 16:03, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ----Rdp060707 (Your questions?/My fight against the devil) 12:05, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 16:19, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Highly visible policy page. 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 15:28, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits in November. -- LuK3 (Talk) 15:49, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Single IP edit warring despite addition of hidden notice. Discussion started on Talk page and IP was notified of behavior yet continues to revert to preferred version. Jalen Folf (talk) 03:08, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:36, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism after 2020 Myanmar election. NinjaStrikers «» 04:50, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator EvergreenFir. Favonian (talk) 16:28, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:51, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:22, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Frequent addition of fake info by IPs. Trivialist (talk) 02:17, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:18, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated vandalism by IP user. Constant314 (talk) 05:53, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:10, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Edit warring and non-consensus changes is continue. I insist that the article be partially protected for the duration of the discussion. Otherwise It will continue. I INSIST!--Joey Camelaroche (talk) 11:07, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is getting ridiculous! The IP (family) has started a discussion on the article talk page. Join it. Favonian (talk) 15:50, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistant LTA target, the last 50 revisions (Since 26 Jul, 1 Protection from 26 Jul until 26 Nov) consist entirely of reverts. Victor Schmidt (talk) 13:38, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 15:52, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 01:31, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined User made an unblock request, which has been denied in the meantime. No disruptive activity after that. Lectonar (talk) 09:30, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 04:24, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 10:42, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 04:28, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 10:34, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lettlerhellocontribs 01:53, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment TFAs are always going to attract some vandalism from new users. It's a bit of a pain to revert it, but maybe that's a good learning opportunity for new users: "anyone can edit Wikipedia, but if I try to muck it up, they'll fix it quickly and maybe block me." It could be argued either way. I'd give it some more time before resorting to protection. OhNoitsJamie Talk 02:13, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined I concur with Ohnotitsjamie. There are occasional edits needing reverting, but not enough to call for protecting TFA. If things change, of course, any other admin is welcome to go ahead and add it. MelanieN (talk) 03:18, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Full protection: This article is inundated with a lot of edits (yes, including a revert fight I almost accidentally triggered) over the last couple of days, with dispute over the "Successor" data. Same issue as what's being experienced on Donald Trump's page, and should be protected until that dispute is resolved. -- Tytrox (talk) 05:49, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:25, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I don't think this will be notable ever. - The9Man (Talk) 06:11, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:27, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPv6 range (at /64 level) vandalizing article within the last 24 hours. MPFitz1968 (talk) 23:44, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. I blocked the range for a week. Wug·a·po·des 00:55, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistant vandalism. Invinciblewalnut (talk) 23:58, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Which should hopefully be enough. If problems continue make another request or let me know on my talk page and I'll protect. Wug·a·po·des 01:05, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive editing. Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content by IP addresses. This page has been protected before because of this problem. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 00:26, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Wug·a·po·des 01:09, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 16:00, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Pinging Johnuniq per your comment on the last request GorillaWarfare (talk) 19:08, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined As before, it is not clear why the IP edits are vandalism. I left an explanation here. Johnuniq (talk) 22:59, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Silly vandalisms by IPs today. A brief reprieve may give them time to pursue another hobby. Ifnord (talk) 21:21, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Thanks zzuuzz. Wug·a·po·des 00:41, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection until November 6, 2024: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States presidential election, 2024 (2nd nomination) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States presidential election, 2024 (3rd nomination) resulted in the salting of 2024 United States presidential election until now, per the longstanding consensus to only have articles on the one upcoming election. The same holds for 2028, so it should be protected until November 6, 2024 while it is written in draft before an incumbent is known. Reywas92Talk 00:00, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Wug·a·po·des 00:36, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. NedFausa (talk) 23:20, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: FireBobQuinn121 (talk · contribs) blocked by LuK3. Wug·a·po·des 00:46, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Wugapodes: Please reconsider your approach. IP vandalism preceded Special:Contributions/FireBobQuinn121 and is continuing after you blocked him. I reiterate my request for temporary semi-protection of Matt Patricia. NedFausa (talk) 01:19, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Well that quickly came back to bite me. Thanks for the ping. Wug·a·po·des 01:23, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. S0091 (talk) 23:20, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 72.201.151.54 (talk · contribs) blocked by LuK3. Wug·a·po·des 00:47, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Subsequently Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by Graeme Bartlett. Wug·a·po·des 01:25, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly Visible Template. Same reasons as {{uw-unsourced1}} or {{uw-unsourced2}}. Widely substituted template. HurricaneTracker495 (talk) 23:30, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Wug·a·po·des 00:50, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction in protection level: From full protection to ECP. See Iridescent's comments at [28]. (If it's possible to combine ECP with Pending Changes that might be ideal.) No answer at User_talk:Oshwah#Joe_Biden and Oshwah has been offline 14 hours. EEng 22:33, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{{rfpp|d}} procedurally though I ultimately agree. This is being discussed at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Full_protection_and_certain_politicians_(you_know_the_ones) and we should avoid forking discussions since this is already scattered all over the place. Wug·a·po·des 00:35, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
FTR I posted here first. :P EEng 00:54, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Time is, like, just an idea man. Regardless, TonyBallioni reduced protection so I'll swap out the template. Wug·a·po·des 00:59, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Already done by administrator TonyBallioni. Wug·a·po·des 00:59, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Due to the person's alleged resign is not official, I'm asking for protection against vandalism or unconfirmed material. Ahmetlii (talk) 18:13, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Doesn't appear to be an ongoing issue now that proper sourcing was added. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:29, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP vandalism came back since the last semi-protection was lifted. Cognissonance (talk) 21:19, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of about a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Specifically, it's protected until 10 December 2020 when the game is supposed to be released. Wug·a·po·des 00:40, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – No need to edit this other than by MRY socks. 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 21:28, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Unnecessary, since he never uses it. Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:43, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

10 November 2020

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 19:36, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., let us try this configuration--Ymblanter (talk) 20:12, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 10:09, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. For the bot. +(CC) Tbhotch 17:12, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. NedFausa (talk) 20:02, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:05, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and WP:BE. Chaipau (talk) 10:28, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – As a contentious article on a conspiracy theory recently promoted by Donald Trump, the article is achieving repeated disruption from anonymous Trump supporters and others who lend false credence to an idea not supported by any reliable source e.g. [29][30][31][32]. No positive change to the article can have long-lasting effect while there is an influx of thousands of Trump supporters per day all motivated to whitewash the article. — Bilorv (talk) 14:27, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by various unregistered users. Jthekid15 (talk) 14:28, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. CuteMeow (talk) 15:08, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:26, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Warner Media and more

A few days of semi-protection: IP editor(s?) causing problems. Common thread: Apparent anger at a particular actor being asked/forced to resign from a particular movie franchise. Possible alternative to semi-protection: 1) Block IP ranges (/64 and /24) from editing these pages for a few days. 2) Edit filter which triggers just on these pages when edited by non-autoconfirmed editors if word "John" or variants of it is used in the edit or edit summary. See also: AIV report against two IPs that went stale, history of a pair of related IPv6 IPs, edit history of an IPv4 from the same ISP. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 01:44, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. I've range-blocked 2001:8003:F48B:6C00::/64 for their disruption toward these articles. If I missed any IPs or ranges, please let me know. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:22, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There was a fake rumor that Ander Herrera had died, but in fact it was just a misunderstanding from the press conference of the PSG manager Thomas Tuchel. Anyways, people are vandalizing the page about it. Please add protection. Paul Vaurie (talk) 03:43, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fish+Karate 12:30, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: No vandalism but a biography of a living person. Needs to be protected.

Thenorthernterritory1234 () 07:55, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Lectonar (talk) 08:53, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing by auto-confirmed users. Page is currently semi-protected. Johnj1995 (talk) 18:36, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: AaronAdamKhan007 (talk · contribs) blocked by Oshwah. Wug·a·po·des 02:47, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. I confirmed that the user was engaging in block evasion after their previous account was blocked. Both accounts are now checkuser-blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:49, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant edit-warring and disruptive editing. User not responding to discussion requests, deletes warnings. --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 18:37, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:02, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some short term protection: Persistent disruption by an IP who refuse to first discuss their unilateral changes on the talk page.--Aréat (talk) 02:32, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. IP is discussing with you on talk and since it's just you two I'd in the dispute I'd probably partial-block from the article instead of full protecting. Wug·a·po·des 02:40, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Wario-Man (talk) 17:00, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:14, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Wario-Man (talk) 17:01, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:16, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Prolix 💬 17:14, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. I've confirmed and checkuser-blocked all three accounts. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:34, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistant IP vandalism. WriterArtistDC (talk) 20:26, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. The most recent /64 was blocked by Materialscientist which should prevent much more disruption. I p-blocked 2003:C0:700:0:0:0:0:0/42 from the talk page for 3 months since that's the range disrupting the page over the last month. Hopefully the combo is enough to stop this without having to protect the talk page again. Wug·a·po·des 02:29, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated disruptive changes to the year in which the film is set; has been discussed at article's Talk page. DonIago (talk) 02:34, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Fuzheado. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:23, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Creation Protection: Despite a February 2020 AfD that resulted in a redirect, the page has been persistently and disruptively re-created numerous times by registered users and IPs without consensus. KidAd talk 02:46, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:24, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. KidAd talk 02:51, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:25, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Widely substituted template. HurricaneTracker495 (talk) 16:37, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 22:22, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This is because from searching for the beginning of the text in the template Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, the search results only bring up 61 results. Some of which are not relevant either. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 22:27, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Dreamy Jazz - I'd possibly consider it "high risk" due to the fact that Twinkle and RedWarn both use this warning if users select the right setting. I can tell you that I've had to go and protect the warning templates that ClueBot NG and Twinkle references and uses due to the fact that a vandal or LTA user learned this, and changed the warning templates to instead leave threats and uncivil messages instead. It was a very long process for me to go back and clean up each "warning" that was left after the user changed them. Just giving a food for thought here. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:12, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. With due respect to Dreamy Jazz, WP:HRT gives as a reason to protect: It is substituted extremely frequently by multiple users on an ongoing basis (for example, templates used to warn users about inappropriate editing. Comparatively, the bar for permanent semi-protection of templates is also pretty low---about 200 transclusions---and while we don't have that data since it's substituted, I think we can assume that bar is cleared given its use in Twinkle and RedWarn. Wug·a·po·des 02:35, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been getting vandalized by both IP users and registered users in the past few days. See the revision history, there have been quite a few reverts and rollbacks recently. Paul Vaurie (talk) 20:48, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:20, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – If you look at pretty much most of the past edits of the page, most of them have been reverted. This has been a constant. Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 21:31, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:20, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed protection: Persistent disruption from IPs and auto-confirmed editors on a BLP article. Tayi Arajakate Talk 10:23, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator DrmiesMelanieN (talk) 01:40, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – MRY continued after last protect. MCC214#ex umbra in solem 10:31, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Man, they are persistent! MelanieN (talk) 02:07, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Page is part of the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war and has gotten continuous disruptive edits and vandalism by IP and new users. — CuriousGolden (T·C) 13:59, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:05, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continual disruptive edits of people posting characters without posting reliable sources. At the very least the page needs to be bought under control. 85.211.130.170 (talk) 15:21, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:06, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: WP:SPA-magnet and long term whitewashing from MDPI employees. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 16:36, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:07, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Oshwah: see you in three months, with the same request for indef semi-protection then. Pending changes won't do anything here. Or not much. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 03:34, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Headbomb - If they don't, leave me a message on my user talk page and let me know. I'm open to tightening things up and extending expirations if this shows little to no slow-down. Just keep in touch and keep me updated. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:36, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Nsk92 (talk) 22:47, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 108.14.246.121 (talk · contribs). Also blocked their account. Both blocked for 36 hours. They were using their account and IP to edit war past 3 reverts, while using the edit summaries to say things like Your turn. If evasion happens, ping me or request here to get semi-protection. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 23:03, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Meant to be an example of a broken redirect, should not be fixed. –User456541 18:38, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ip troll, same one targeting Shimon Prokupecz. Crboyer (talk) 22:52, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. as the vandalism continued post implementation of the pending changes, 2 weeks of semi protection should keep this away. I went with 2 weeks as this IP hasn't edited before here. There has also been good edits from IPs recently, so a shorter protection to that of Shimon is more appropriate here. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 23:08, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Return of heavy vandalism which has occurred a lot on the page the past several months. The page was semi-protected for a year back in February, but for some reason, I have no idea why, someone removed the protection. Vandalism has been persistent on this page despite multiple protections. Other Atlantic hurricane pages such as Sandy, Harvey, Florence and Irma have seen similar vandalism and are indefinitely semi-protected. See the page's protection history. Simmyrak (talk) 23:33, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Simmyrak, the protection was removed due to a shorter length full protection being added. I'll reinstate the semi-protection now. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 23:42, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. so that the expiry is near the previous protection length implemented by Ymblanter. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 23:45, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Courtesy ping to Ymblanter as I noticed they had declined above after I protected, however, since there has been a lot of vandalism in the last hour I think that the protection is needed regardless. Ymblanter, you may modify this protection as you wish. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 23:49, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Unregistered users adding unsourced materials. 219.78.190.92 (talk) 07:09, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:56, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-changing vandal repetitively vandalizes this page at least once every two days for as long as they can before they are blocked. Pahunkat (talk) 20:48, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Based on the last protection and the persistency of the IP, 6 months should hopefully be enough. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 22:43, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Page being targeted by IP socks of HarveyTeenager. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 22:14, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If sockpuppetry continues, further longer protection should be requested. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 22:38, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Return of heavy vandalism, long term abuse and serious BLP violations almost immediately after previous protection ended. Simmyrak (talk) 22:44, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hopefully they won't return after the 2 months of protection, but if they return ping me or request here for longer / indefinite protection. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 22:54, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

11 November 2020

Page protection from unregistered users.Hsyrtk (talk) 00:28, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Favonian (talk) 16:49, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of persistent IP vandalism. SuddenlyMangoes (talk) 07:34, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:06, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by several IP users who rely on speculation over season 3. Areaseven (talk) 08:55, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:13, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Have seen multiple IP users removing or modifying the statement about Joe Biden winning. — MrConorAE (👤U | 💬T | 📝C) 20:23, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 21:57, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism from unregistered users even after a 3-day protection. Iaintfaking (talk) 05:12, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:59, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalisms strike again after previous protection expired. NinjaStrikers «» 14:49, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Favonian (talk) 18:35, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by unregistered users, typically on the name and image captions. Jthekid15 (talk) 17:48, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:53, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP concerns and unsourced changes. Subject is the leader of the Proud Boys group and so is a fairly contentious subject. GorillaWarfare (talk) 18:41, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:48, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Election results are not officially announced and counting in progress. User:Lesenwriter -Lesenwriter (talk) 16:21, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:19, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High traffic visible page, also the general arbitration enforcement topic. Ahmetlii (talk) 16:30, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:22, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated addition of unsourced information. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 14:25, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Vanamonde (Talk) 16:00, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 6 months. This article is covered by WP:ARBIPA. EdJohnston (talk) 18:09, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent IP vandalism. (t · c) buidhe 18:01, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 3 months. EdJohnston (talk) 18:07, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent IP sockpuppetry, again from the same user, User:VeryGoodBoy, as before. It may not seem very obvious, but some of the older IP addresses, such as 125.212.xx.xx, have been reassigned since then to other locations. Esiymbro (talk) 01:27, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:48, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 15:57, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:37, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: the page was protected to prevent creation, now that it has been created, protection not needed. Coderzombie (talk) 13:57, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ping GB fan, protecting admin. Favonian (talk) 17:19, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected ~ GB fan 17:25, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected – for the bot. Favonian (talk) 17:27, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. dawnie_t 04:46, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Dee03 07:21, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – spelling variant of salted Harsh Bisaria. Captain Calm (talk) 15:15, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done page salted at sysop Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 15:19, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Widely substituted. HurricaneTracker495 (talk) 13:51, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 14:34, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Widely substituted. HurricaneTracker495 (talk) 13:52, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 14:34, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Widely substituted. HurricaneTracker495 (talk) 13:54, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 14:34, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: User request. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 14:43, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Destroyeraa: Sorry but I can't see anything compatible with Wikipedia:Protection policy#User talk pages. There is a confused and new editor. If they persist, please ask them politely to stop posting on your page. If it happens after that, notify me and I'll ask them. Johnuniq (talk) 08:32, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. CuteMeow (talk) 06:37, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Can't see it. Johnuniq (talk) 08:55, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Darren-M talk 12:20, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | tålk 12:36, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:36, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:12, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – A lot of the edits made here are reverted. Sometimes it's vandalism, sometimes gamecruft, sometimes unsourced content, etc. Edits are infrequent. InvalidOStalk 16:17, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:15, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism coming from many different IPs. NightFire19 (talk) 17:44, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:34, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent vandalism and BLP violations Prolix 💬 09:10, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Prolix: The most recent editors, including the IP, are blocked. Notify me if problems persist after this. Johnuniq (talk) 08:22, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Johnuniq, will do so Prolix 💬 09:09, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – non-stop Spanish vandalism since protection ended. Meters (talk) 06:30, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:45, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ----Rdp060707 (Your questions?/My fight against the devil) 07:16, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:43, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Gilbert.JW (talk) 07:31, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:42, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from multiple IPs. Requesting indefinite protection instead of temporary, as this article has had temporary protection in place three times before, with the most recent lasting one year. Jackdude101 talk cont 14:51, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Jackdude101: Indefinite is only for extremely extreme cases. Johnuniq (talk) 08:35, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent disruptive changes to the DOB by IPs, goes back quite sometime. Asking for some mid term protection here. Gotitbro (talk) 18:39, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Gotitbro: Only one week because the article has not been protected before and because the talk page was last edited three years ago (by a bot). There is usually an underlying reason when a battle over DoB occurs. The long-term solution is to either remove the date if there is any doubt about it, or to post an explanation on talk with an extract from the reference and an opinion that the source is reliable. Refer people changing the date to the talk page in edit summaries and try to get them engaged to find out why they want to change it. Johnuniq (talk) 08:46, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User:MariaJaydHicky. (CC) Tbhotch 19:27, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:47, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Page is persistently disruptively editted by Vallabharebel and various ip socks. Spike 'em (talk) 07:48, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Could all pages in Category:Indian Cricket League teams be protected as they suffer similar abuse? Spike 'em (talk) 07:51, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Spike 'em: Hyderabad Heroes was semi-protected for 2 weeks by another admin and I protected Chandigarh Lions and Mumbai Champs for a month. The other articles in the category have not been edited recently. If problems persist, notify me, preferably with a link to here to remind me. Johnuniq (talk) 08:17, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent vandalism of IPs and autoconfirmed editors. HiwilmsTalk 09:57, 10 November 2020 (UTC) @Hiwilms: Nah. I think semi is enough. 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 23:26, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 08:24, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced contents by ips as well as new users. However, new users can be dealt with but ips are hard to dealt with. The protection was expired on 29th Oct, was for two week but I think this time a longer period is needed,. Drat8sub (talk) 12:12, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:27, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – High amounts of edit warring at the same time as discussions on talk pages. All users presently edit-warring are already able to edit semi-protected articles. Thanks, SixulaTalk 13:12, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question Can you see evidence that they are conduct edit warring in the article? I don't believe it can justify the protection unless there are vandalism in the article. I don't see any effort to distrupt the article, in other words, most of edits are constructive. If they conduct distruptive editing, this is more likely content dispute. 36.68.199.128 (talk) 13:23, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@36.68.199.128: there has been 30+ edits on the page in the last 3 days which have each deleted over one thousand bytes of data, with constant reverts. To answer your second question, yes, it is an content dispute, but at the same time as they are debating the content, they are editing the very things being discussed. I have also recommended mediation and an RfC which the editors gave no opinion, but at present day they are edit warring. You can view the page history which is just lots of edit warring. Thanks, SixulaTalk 20:44, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 08:28, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – widely substituted. HurricaneTracker495 (talk) 02:56, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @HurricaneTracker495: I'm sympathetic about this sort of protection but I checked {{uw-spam1}} (and 2/3/4) and they all have same semi-protection edit + move. I think a central discussion would need to establish what should happen to all the related templates. Johnuniq (talk) 04:20, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 04:14, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Jingiby: Sorry but this kind of dispute cannot be settled by locking out the IP editors for a short period. I'm afraid an RfC will be needed. Maintaining the article will be easier if an RfC results in a clear consensus. Please consider whether some other wording could be devised to avoid the nationalist edit warring. I read the quote in ref 1 which does not really justify a statement in Wikipedia's void about a particular nationality. Ask on my talk if wanted for how to run an RfC, or try WP:Teahouse. Johnuniq (talk) 04:28, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 17:07, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:29, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: BLP article. Unsourced claim Schlossberg is having an affair. Appears to be the same user (same Spanish-language edit summary) using multiple IPs and temporary SPAs. Left a warning at User_talk:Seanzzzzgx12 to no avail. -- GreenC 00:23, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 05:18, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring (adding unreliable content/sources) by some IP user since 7 November. Wario-Man (talk) 05:23, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 07:24, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent BLP violations relating to accusations he's not been charged with, never mind convicted of. Previously semi-protected three times in relation to this. FDW777 (talk) 10:05, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 6 months. EdJohnston (talk) 04:30, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism started again days after it was unprotected. Many edits were reverted by Cluebot NG. Please requesting protection one week or longer. 36.68.199.128 (talk) 22:29, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Longer duration justified given the high traffic and interest in this topic until January 2021 Fuzheado | Talk 05:15, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 23:37, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There is currently an RfC going on the talk page, but multiple editors have circumvented the RfC to make the change preemptively. GorillaWarfare (talk) 04:56, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Can be unprotected earlier in the case of consensus being established. Fuzheado | Talk 05:02, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP vandalism (removal of content). PedroLucasDBr (talk) 22:30, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism because this law firm represents President Trump in alleged voter fraud litigation. NedFausa (talk) 00:17, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Acroterion (talk) 00:20, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism from 5 IPs. The changes are unexplained ones to an FA. Aza24 (talk) 01:55, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BD2412 T 02:12, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Page is part of the recent 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war, which has resulted in attention of lot of disruptive editing and vandalism by IP and new users — CuriousGolden (T·C) 03:24, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. as arbitration enforcement--Ymblanter (talk) 20:14, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:00, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and sock puppetry directly after unprotect. Request somewhat longer protection than previously. Wolbo (talk) 22:13, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:33, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

12 November 2020

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 00:43, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ‑Scottywong| [express] || 17:11, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – SPA user Marcelrayduriez engaging in edit warring to add poorly sourced and non-significant information to article. Gbear605 (talk) 01:48, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retracted - user has been banned at WP:AN3#User:Marcelrayduriez reported by User:Toccata quarta (Result: Indef), so doesn't seem to be needed anymore. They might come back as an anonymous user though, we'll see. Gbear605 (talk) 15:14, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined per above. Please re-report if disruption continues. -- LuK3 (Talk) 17:20, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection: Highly visible page. 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 13:35, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- LuK3 (Talk) 17:16, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple vandalism attempts from unregistered users. Iaintfaking (talk) 16:02, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ‑Scottywong| [verbalize] || 16:41, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Gotitbro (talk) 21:07, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ‑Scottywong| [gab] || 16:56, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 21:46, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined ‑Scottywong| [chatter] || 17:05, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: There is an ongoing edit war/content disagreement over some edits. NoahTalk 23:12, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. ‑Scottywong| [soliloquize] || 16:58, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP vandalism- there's a race at the venue in 2 days, so maybe 3-4 days protection should suffice. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:21, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Gone for 1 week so there is a good amount of buffer time between the race ending and the page being unprotected. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 19:59, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IanDBeacon (talk) 16:48, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 19:57, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated vandalism. IHateAccounts (talk) 16:51, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 19:54, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Absolutely no reason to edit this without discussion, and vandalism target. 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 16:52, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. This page hasn't been edited since 2017, how on Earth can you claim "persistent vandalism"??? ‑Scottywong| [spill the beans] || 17:06, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – repeated addition by IP of unsourced promotional content. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:14, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ‑Scottywong| [express] || 16:21, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated attempts to deliberately misgender a transgender person. Jay Coop · Talk · Contributions 20:54, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ‑Scottywong| [converse] || 16:22, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page was previously protected until an admin mistakenly deleted the page last week - if possible can this be reinstated. There is a history of vandalism on this page. Nightfury 09:47, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. That page has been semi-protected since 2011, it was probably about time to unprotect it and see if it can exist normally without protection. ‑Scottywong| [spill the beans] || 16:35, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Longterm semi-protection: An IP-hopper has been posting nonsense and uncited claims and screeds on the article since 5 August 2020, and has been edit-warring when reverted. Softlavender (talk) 10:18, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Rangeblocked for 3 months. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:52, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Every edit is either vandals or disruptive. Madbrad200 (talk) 00:53, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [express] || 17:10, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High levels of IP vandalism and malicious reverts. Firestar464 (talk) 05:20, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. ‑Scottywong| [communicate] || 17:08, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and hijacking sources by changing sourced material. The page Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran faced a very similar trait of vandalism in September and is now protected. Pahlevun (talk) 11:04, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Excessive vandalism in this articles by anons that change the entire prose especially in the infobox. Temporary for a 15 at least would be enough I hope.Tintor2 (talk) 20:14, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [confer] || 16:52, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent unconstructive editing. Multiple IP's (likely the same person) changing neutral prose to a more fancruft-like prose. Armegon (talk) 21:06, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [confabulate] || 16:55, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated non-NPOV edits, many additions of factually incorrect info regarding census data, several COI edits, and helpfully almost all made by IPs. (Note: the census stuff is the most recent repeated issue, and the main reason I'm requesting semi-protection. The changes are unsourced and contradict the current sources as well as any other data I've found.). Perryprog (talk) 21:26, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [talk] || 17:02, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Most of recent contribs are vandalism. Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 23:52, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [gab] || 16:59, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Constant addition of unsourced content. -- /Alex/21 00:17, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [soliloquize] || 17:01, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 14:12, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [verbalize] || 16:36, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There is persistent vandalism from different IP on this page. This page has been semi protected multiple times in the past. Please consider indefinite protection. ChunnuBhai (talk) 14:55, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [comment] || 16:38, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection or edit-confirmed protection: High level of IP vandalism. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:13, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [confess] || 16:43, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content from a highly disruptive IP from Malaysia. Going on for months now BlueJag (talk) 17:32, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also, range-blocked IP user. ‑Scottywong| [yak] || 16:47, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article keeps getting pwned by a variety of IP editors, who keep adding random episodes from other shows to the list. Then there's another IP editor who will show up and remove the garbage entries, and get reverted by patrollers who aren't paying attention. Sick of seeing the exact same edit in RC every few days. jp×g 18:13, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [yak] || 16:49, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Babymissfortune 02:45, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [babble] || 16:23, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 03:23, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. ‑Scottywong| [prattle] || 16:25, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Users keep adding Dynamite is a single from Be (BTS album) which can be misleading. EN-Jungwon (talk) 04:44, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [comment] || 16:33, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 07:53, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Two disruptive edits by the same IP. If they persist, report to AIV. Kosack (talk) 13:21, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 08:07, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Two disruptive edits by the same IP. If the user persists, report to AIV. Kosack (talk) 13:20, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 11Fox11 (talk) 19:55, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [gab] || 16:10, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly Visible Template. Widely substituted. HurricaneTracker495 (talk) 20:01, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. ‑Scottywong| [express] || 16:17, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Increase in disruptive editing from IP users today. Bowling is life (talk) 05:16, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 08:07, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Two disruptive edits from the same IP, not enough to justify protecting. Kosack (talk) 13:18, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: User is deceased; see Wikipedia:Deceased Wikipedians/2019#Reinhold Aman. Psychonaut (talk) 10:33, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected indefinitely. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 15:40, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of edit warring. New users are repeatedly removing sourced content and replacing it with religious claims of ancestry that only pertain to a certain branch.

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [chat] || 16:06, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent spate of vandalism in the past few hours; is now major public figure, so best to cut it off now. Iseult Δx parlez moi 01:14, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. (CC) Tbhotch 05:12, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Trump/Biden vandalism target. Sjö (talk) 11:44, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 12:36, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA4#ARBPIA_General_Sanctions. nableezy - 15:44, 10 November 2020 (UTC) 15:44, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 14:42, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 22:53, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Recommend Extended-Confirmed Protection for creation. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:01, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

13 November 2020

Extended confirmed protection: Per WP:APL. Furthermore, many edits by IP editors have been reverted. George Ho (talk) 09:31, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:04, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Tons of unsourced changes recently; name/birthplace keeps getting changed without any discussion on the talk page. ~ ItsJustLukas talk|Contribs 03:57, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator MaterialscientistMelanieN (talk) 21:48, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring by BlueboyLINY and Tvstationfan101. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 05:02, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Those two have been slow motion edit warring (being careful not to violate WP:3RR) for months. I am going to tell them both that the page will remain locked unless and until they reach some kind of agreement. MelanieN (talk) 21:57, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Repeated TP abuse by indef blocked user. IanDBeacon (talk) 13:23, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Modified block to remove talk page access. ‑Scottywong| [converse] || 13:52, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 14:29, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:13, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Blatant persistent advertising from an ip who claims to be the marketing officer of the center. Atlantic306 (talk) 22:39, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: OhNoitsJamie (talk · contribs). Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:55, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 04:12, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. If User:Ajbrownfan persists, report him to an appropriate noticeboard. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:46, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: The Yorkshire Ripper died today and the article about him is being subject to high levels of IP vandalism. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 08:26, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:38, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Vizzinifezzikwomanchuck (talk) 21:16, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:28, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Multiple recent instances of vandalism by various IPs. Unsure if I've fixed it much, any other editors are welcome to take a look. (Please be sure to ping me if you reply.) Sean Stephens (talk) 03:20, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Sean Stephens: I blocked the IP for a short period. Please let me know if problems resume. Johnuniq (talk) 06:35, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Johnuniq: Thank you. Will do. Sean Stephens (talk) 06:47, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various not autoconfirmed or confirmed editors (new account editors) have continuously vandalizing the article non-stop. — YoungForever(talk) 03:31, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, nothing useful. --Julius Senegal (talk) 19:18, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:11, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – IP editor repeatedly edit warring to reintroduce BLP violations with unreliable sources. ♟♙ (talk) 19:52, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:13, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: The article has recently been subjected to a series of disruptive editing and edit warring as you can see on the article history. The article was protected before numerous times for similar disruptions, but after the protection limit expired it is happening again. Please protect it. Dilbaggg (talk) 20:08, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting urgency due to repetitive WP:EW by the 2601 IP range, it is very difficult to deal with disruptions by dynamic IP range, requesting urgency in page protection. Dilbaggg (talk) 03:32, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Dilbaggg: Next time, please put an explanation on article talk showing what the problem is, and try to get the IP to engage there. Johnuniq (talk) 06:16, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. Jevansen (talk) 20:54, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:26, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Page was briefly sysop protected due to an edit war, and that protection is about to expire. The previous semi-protection (expiring 18:51, 7 February 2021) should be reinstated to prevent the fairly high amount of disruption on this page from IP and new editors. GorillaWarfare (talk) 04:38, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:20, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It was on Jimmy Kimmel. Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 05:11, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 06:17, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: repeated addition of unsourced content to BLP from IPs. GiantSnowman 14:46, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 05:59, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Elizium23 (talk) 16:08, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:00, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 17:23, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:09, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated amount of IP vandalism. Mburrell (talk) 22:02, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Mburrell: I blocked the IP. They look determined so might return. Please let me know if problems persist. Johnuniq (talk) 02:38, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AndreDaGamer 2:47, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 05:56, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Arab-Israeli conflict -editing by IPs. Shrike (talk) 13:32, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 15:34, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 23:03, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:29, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Potential sockpuppetry as well. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 23:28, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @P,TO 19104: Sorry but I'm not going to semi-protect a BLP with what might be WP:UNDUE text in the WP:LEAD. The talk page was last edited in February 2019. Please ask for opinions at WP:BLPN. Johnuniq (talk) 02:27, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: One month semi-protection ended 2 days ago. Disruptive editing 4 times since then. Doctorhawkes (talk) 08:02, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Doctorhawkes and Local Potentate: The IP changed the birth date to 17 May 1962 which agrees with the first reference which says "Born Thursday, 17th May, 1962". The talk page has nothing on it. Please do not revert without an explanation and please fix the date. If there is a doubt about the date, leave it out and put an explanation on talk. Johnuniq (talk) 23:14, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: One month semi-protection ended 2 days ago. Disruptive editing 4 times since then. Doctorhawkes (talk) 08:02, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Doctorhawkes: Please put an explanation on talk as to why the IP's reference (which I didn't look at that, but they claim to have something) is overruled by whatever ref is in the article. Someone familiar with the topic might find it obvious but talk pages need to document issues that arise in a way that onlookers such as myself can follow. Also, please try to get the IP engaged on talk by directing them there in an edit summary. After that, if problem persist, ping me or request again. I hope the birth date is not being sourced by Twitter. If there is any doubt, leave it out. Johnuniq (talk) 23:20, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 23:42, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 02:18, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – the same content is constantly being removed by different IP's. ~ ItsJustLukas talk|Contribs 00:11, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 02:17, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandals. ZimZalaBim talk 01:48, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:16, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. El Millo (talk) 19:53, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs keep adding a non-existent future film in here. Bollyjeff | talk 19:53, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: until January 20, 2021. Continuing IPs & drive by editors 'removing Harris from the article's infobox. Usually doing so with 'messy' edits. GoodDay (talk) 21:29, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's see how it goes after that. MelanieN (talk) 01:10, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. NedFausa (talk) 22:38, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ponyo. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 01:45, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 00:19, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 01:24, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The edit history for the last few years is almost entirely a tedious series of reverts of IP editors that remove the description of the subject's theories as "fringe" every couple of months. – Joe (talk) 08:47, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Joe Roe: The article has not been protected before so I found it hard to justify more than a week. If problems resume, feel free to ping me for more. Johnuniq (talk) 23:24, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection or edit-confirmed protection: Most of the edits in the last month were IP vandalism. 37.25.70.46 (talk) 11:09, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 23:28, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 11:23, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 23:30, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 23:21, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection: Highly visible page. 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 22:36, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Johnuniq (talk) 22:59, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP user (previously a registered user who I believe may be the same person) is editing the article to include incorrect information. Despite its name, this league is actually the fourth tier in the Spanish league system. I left a message on the original user's talk page a few weeks ago, explaining in depth how it is in fact the fourth tier and not the third, with links to the tier breakdown. However, they have now returned as an IP (at least I believe it is the same person). The IP is not static so leaving a message on their talk page will not work. I have also posted on the article's talk page with the information as well. RedPatchBoy (talk) 01:21, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 23:01, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – There's been some persistent disruption by the banned sock puppeteer It's gonna be awesome (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 02:56, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (Same as last time.) Johnuniq (talk) 23:02, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Someone is repeatedly adding strange formatting to the lead and including personal contact info. See, for example, Special:Diff/988059047 and Special:Diff/988127539. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:24, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 23:06, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content. NØ 07:19, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 23:07, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Req: 2 week semi. IP hopper at 157.49.* keeps adding incoherent "controversy" content. See [33][34][35][36] plus others, and most recently here. They can't write in complete sentences, they don't seem to understand the 5 Ws, they don't quite understand that we don't typically focus on "controversy" sections, and they haven't been great about providing WP:NPOV. I'd protect this article myself, but since they've snarkily called me "Saviour Cyphoidbomb", I figure I'll abstain for the time being, though it seems pretty egregiously contrary to BLP norms. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:45, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

14 November 2020

One year semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by various users trying to distort the role of various nations in the current proxy war between Iran and Turkey. ZaDoraemonzu (talk) 05:37, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:36, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Petition to add long term protection - page is under persistent IP attacks for nearly 2 years. --BlameRuiner (talk) 13:44, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:29, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:59, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:31, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection, pending RfC being opened. There's a slow-moving, multi-day, and highly politicized editwar going on, to change the MoS on the handling of former names of transgender and non-binary subjects. There's sprawling discussion on the talk page, which has not come to a consensus, and multiple parties have suggested an RfC, but editwarring against the long-stable language in the guideline continues, and needs to stop until a well-advertised RfC actually settles the matter. As this matter crosses both WP:ARBMOS and WP:ARBGG discretionary sanctions lines, we should err on the side of stopping further conflict.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  14:02, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:33, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:15, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:34, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism(185.54.231.45). I am afraid that war about Hanfu on Chinese Wikipedia has been extended to the English Wikipedia. Some people deny the origin and existence of Hanfu before 21th century, just because they think that the term Hanfu is used in 21th century, which goes against the cognition of the whole world. I know who 185.54.231.45 is. He will write his opinion again and again. So increase the protection level, please.61.221.30.98 (talk) 17:12, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is a content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:10, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 06:57, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:09, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from non-autoconfirmed users. Maka(talk) 10:44, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator LuK3. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:09, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent daily revisionist vandalism, changing information without source or reason. Kevo327 (talk) 11:14, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:20, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: A lot of the most recent edits are being made by IP addresses that are then being reverted. Wikibenboy94 (talk) 11:44, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:21, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Nationalist battleground. DuncanHill (talk) 12:17, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:22, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, probably due to the ongoing Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. HistoryofIran (talk) 11:14, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Semi-protection would not help, since several of the disruptive editors are autoconfirmed. MelanieN (talk) 22:21, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 08:22, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:04, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Three instances of unreferenced BLP violations about being a neo-Nazi from different IPs / new accounts. — MarkH21talk 09:20, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:24, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reduce protection: The "List of United Nations resolutions concerning Palestine" currently allows IP users and is not protected at this time. There, I've not yet seen much disruption from mostly IP and new editors recently. Furthermore, my request for protection on other article under a different Arb case was rejected. Moreover, I saw that WP:ARBPIA4 replaced most of remedies from previous related cases. Those have made me wonder whether ECP is necessary for the already-protected article. George Ho (talk) 18:35, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @George Ho: My reading of the Arbcom 500/30 remedy is that while ECP is not mandatory, editors who do not satisfy 500/30 are prohibited from editing related articles. Accordingly, adjusting the permission would be pointless. Johnuniq (talk) 06:12, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection:: Currently Indefinite Semiprotected, but have not been enought since the multiple IP editors continue to disrupt the same part of the article with a new created account and using false edit summaries to push to a POV view.Mr.User200 (talk) 23:39, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. MelanieN (talk) 21:47, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Was protected due to sock puppetry in July/August - it appears as if the sock puppets are back again. — Chevvin 06:32, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Have to escalate slowly. Johnuniq (talk) 09:03, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – High level of removal of sourced content by IPs and new accounts. Grayfell (talk) 08:23, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 09:03, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
User:Melsaran (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Remove the talk page content at the bottom. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:42, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done Johnuniq (talk) 06:16, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IPs. El Millo (talk) 22:35, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 05:54, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 22:50, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 05:55, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pretty much all vandalism since protection expired. Seems like a topic that should have indefinite protection because you are always going to have people who hate this team and will vandalize. Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 00:27, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 05:56, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – low volume but persistence vandalism/disruptive edit since Nov 10, 2020. Cassiopeia(talk) 00:41, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 05:57, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, addition of promotional and copyright infringement content by multiple WP:SPAs. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 00:52, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 05:59, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. SpectresWrath (talk) 03:29, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:01, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User:UnderArmourKid. (CC) Tbhotch 05:18, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:02, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 15:13, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Destroyeraa: I blocked the user. Let me know if problems persist bearing in mind that one IP edit I checked was not vandalism and would not warrant protection (that is, there would be have to be obvious trouble for me to take further action). Johnuniq (talk) 02:18, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. KidAd talk 17:54, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @KidAd: I checked three recent edits; they were not vandalism and there is nothing on talk. Please post again with a couple of diffs and a brief explanation if the issue continues. Johnuniq (talk) 02:28, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term magnet for the woo-woo folks. Previous semi expired last month. VQuakr (talk) 02:25, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 05:07, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection. Presentation of a fringe theory and deletion of proper tags from the text by an IP user. The IP user's warring and PoV-pushing mentality is well documented at the article's Talk page and at my own Talk page. Borsoka (talk) 16:25, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Borsoka: I'm sure the IP will return after three days. When that happens, please try to get a discussion with people from a relevant wikiproject or perhaps WP:FTN. It's difficult to justify long-term protection or sanctions against the IP unless there is a clearer consensus. Johnuniq (talk) 02:24, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your action. Yes, I was thinking of a wider discussion, involving WikiprojectRomania. Borsoka (talk) 02:31, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruption by random IPs who keeps in a questionable manner adding random people whom we have no article of. HistoryofIran (talk) 18:33, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:30, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP disruptive editing and insults/poor slurs - [37] Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 21:21, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(non-admin comment) This looks like a content dispute to me, and it seems the IP is being reasonable. We include flags in infoboxes all the time. If there is truly a statement in the MOS that forbids flags in infoboxes, you should link to it. Simply invoking the entire MOS with the link MOS:STYLE is not sufficient. ― Tartan357 Talk 01:23, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Calling these edits "hate speech" is absurd. I suggest Sadko review WP:NPA, WP:AGF, and WP:NOOB. ― Tartan357 Talk 01:32, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The guideline is WP:INFOBOXFLAG and some IP edit summaries violated WP:NPA. Johnuniq (talk) 02:34, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Tartan357: If you were to be called "Greater American propagandist" I'm pretty damn sure you would not like it, and yes, it is a personal attack and hate speech in my book, and I am fully keeping my right to call it that way. Thank you for input. Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 10:45, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sadko, sure, but the IP you reverted when you made that comment did not say that. That was a different IP who reverted after you made that comment. ― Tartan357 Talk 18:05, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Vandalized multiple times immediately after protection expired. ― Tartan357 Talk 23:36, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:36, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Part of the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict: arbitration code aa2. RedPanda25 21:18, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is some vandalism and/or edit warring, look in edit history. A lot of people are removing any reference to it being in Artsakh and replacing them with references to Azerbaijan. RedPanda25 22:43, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Semi per precedent here. Johnuniq (talk) 02:11, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 11:43, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:12, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 11:58, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:13, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There is no reason why IP's would need to edit this, apart when they accidentially edit the wrong page. Similar to the protection of Wikipedia:Your first article. Victor Schmidt (talk) 20:06, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Fuzheado | Talk 02:11, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring with unconfirmed IPs and accounts. Vandalism as well. Unsourced content. HurricaneTracker495 (talk) 20:31, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 02:12, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by an IP. El Millo (talk) 21:34, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 02:14, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from an IP who has now returned on another IP. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:42, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. I see a long history of both pending changes and semi-protection. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:46, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism (ignoring invisible comments, disregarding MOS:CAPS, re-adding false info). D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 01:43, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 02:07, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

15 November 2020

Temporary semi-protection: IP and some new users are spreading vandalism in this article Janm 7 (talk) 16:04, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ‑Scottywong| [talk] || 19:20, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: WP:ARBPIA article with persistant distuptive editing. MatryoshkaNL (talk) 16:27, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:25, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from a series of different IP's at a WP:BLP. --IJBall (contribstalk) 16:49, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:28, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:36, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ‑Scottywong| [express] || 19:18, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ----Rdp060707 (Your questions?/My fight against the devil) 07:19, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GorillaWarfare (talk) 18:49, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Violations of BLP again. See talk page for details. Given the use of sockpuppets before, please protect ECP (note that one of the involved users is autoconfirmed). MrClog (talk) 12:14, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. from editing that page. GorillaWarfare (talk) 19:03, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:38, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GorillaWarfare (talk) 19:06, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – As mentioned on Talk page, there is disruptive editing, content disputes, and as mentioned in [|Talk:Straight-through processing#Request for comment], a consensus that all references to Mr Karat should be removed from this page. Temporary semi-protection was requested and granted in March 2019. It was removed in April 2019, and an anonymous user added back in the reference to Mr Karat. Temporary semi-protection was requested and granted in May 2019. It was removed in June 2019, and an anonymous user added back in the reference to Mr Karat. The unverifiable information was again removed in September 2019, only to re-appear 8 September 2020 by an anonymous user with comment "Added factually proven evidence" which this clearly is not.

I think that Indefinite semi-protection would be effective; alternatively, another Temporary semi-protection for 1 year. Jedison brussels (talk) 12:49, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GorillaWarfare (talk) 19:07, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – Use of original research to make controversial statements about a living person. Hirolovesswords (talk) 03:01, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. ‑Scottywong| [express] || 18:10, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – Use of original research to make controversial statements about a living person. Hirolovesswords (talk) 03:04, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. ‑Scottywong| [verbalize] || 18:11, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unregistered user such as 32.208.110.146 keep editing and adding unnecessary information. While unregistered user 157.51.4.246 deleted everything or partially deleted everything even after reverting. Paper9oll | Talk:(Paper9oll) 04:35, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ‑Scottywong| [speak] || 18:25, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This needs either semi-protection or a temporary rangeblock of the 102.250.1.xxx range, since there's shifting IPs all making the same general bad edits. Gatemansgc (TɅ̊LK) 05:14, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Expanded block to a rangeblock of 102.250.1.0/24. ‑Scottywong| [chat] || 18:28, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent protection just lifted and the same vandalism as before started up once again. Requesting a lengthy temporary protection. Favre1fan93 (talk) 14:34, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:37, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent IP vandalism at BLP. —valereee (talk) 14:44, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:39, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs keep adding entries that don't belong. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 15:14, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:41, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple disruptive IP edits shortly after semi-protection expired. ― Tartan357 Talk 07:19, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [communicate] || 19:06, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:33, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 19:12, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:52, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 19:13, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:14, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected until January 21, 2021. ‑Scottywong| [squeal] || 19:15, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Two NY school pages

Temporary semi-protection: IP-hopping block evasion of user:47.20.18.234 . Articles use National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) as a source for the attendance data (by consensus at the schools' project this is the standard for US high schools). Editor is replacing the latest data (2018-2019) with unsourced values and stating that the data is NCES 2020-2021. Meters (talk) 09:29, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 18:51, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unconstructive IP edits following a prominent news story involving the subject. KyleJoantalk 11:02, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 18:53, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Pahunkat (talk) 11:21, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 18:55, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Can we get protection until January 21st?. Idan (talk) 11:26, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected until February 1, 2021. Won't help the edit war that's currently going on, but hopefully that can be resolved some other way, such as at WP:ANEW. GorillaWarfare (talk) 18:56, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. -- /Alex/21 03:32, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [talk] || 18:21, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs/new users repeatedly adding unofficial results/calling a winner against the consensus at Talk:2020 United States presidential election#RfC: What sources should be used for calling states?, and adding other unsourced material. ― Tartan357 Talk 04:23, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [spout] || 18:20, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Geraldo Perez (talk) 06:46, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [squeal] || 18:31, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Elizium23 (talk) 02:48, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [gossip] || 17:52, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Elizium23 (talk) 02:49, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [verbalize] || 18:01, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: IPs POV-pushing by removing sourced content and references. - Sumanuil (talk) 03:28, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [prattle] || 18:14, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Vandalism in birh date from IP adress. There is an OTRS declaration (see Talk page) of incorrect date of birth by the person. ~Moheen (keep talking) 06:37, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Moheen: I have only looked at this quickly so if I'm missing something, please let me know. The talk section is too vague: it should say what the OTRS claim is (does it specify a correct date? what date is declared to be incorrect? was any reason given?). Is ref 1 the only support for the date? I cannot see an actual birth date in that reference! At any rate, IMHO such a source cannot be regarded as reliable and my solution would be to omit the birth date. At any rate, without a much clearer explanation of which IP edits are vandalism (by Wikipedia's WP:VAND definition) and how it is known they are vandalism, protection of the article would not be appropriate. Any other opinions? Johnuniq (talk) 09:14, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Johnuniq: VRTS ticket # 2020102010004901 have the attached official document which mentions the date of birth is 20 February 1989. ~Moheen (keep talking) 09:45, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined @Moheen: This is not a suitable place to discuss the issue so I commented at article talk. The IP's edits do not satisfy Wikipedia's definition of vandalism so article protection is not a suitable response. Johnuniq (talk) 00:37, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: User request within there own user space-no one needs to edit besides Lowercase Sigmabot 3 needs to be EC so he can archive the page however. HurricaneTracker495 (talk) 20:21, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. User talk pages (and their archives) are rarely protected unless there is evidence of vandalism on those pages. See WP:UPPROT. ‑Scottywong| [spill the beans] || 01:03, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Archive, shouldn't need to be modified. DannyS712 (talk) 04:56, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Mz7. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:55, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Same vandalism resumed following expiry of last semi-protection - Arjayay (talk) 12:39, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:54, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:32, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:53, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An AfD resulted in a redirect but instead an edit war has started. I'm not a side in this battle, however I have it on my watch list. Gonnym (talk) 17:15, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined There's a discussion open at WP:ANEW, which is where it should be addressed. I've handled the report there. GorillaWarfare (talk) 23:10, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:41, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GorillaWarfare (talk) 23:32, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP users adding to alternative medicine section repeatedly. Gsquaredxc (talk) 23:46, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:05, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism of GA page by someone who uses a different account every time they mess with it. sexitoni (talk) 15:18, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:52, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition of unsourced content by IP. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:05, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:55, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition of unsourced content by IP. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:05, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:55, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. S0091 (talk) 01:47, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:50, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Widely substituted, unlike tpv2 or tpv3 or tpv4 or tpv4im. HurricaneTracker495 (talk) 17:33, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. ‑Scottywong| [confess] || 01:06, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. GorillaWarfare (talk) 18:10, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [chatter] || 00:58, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple unregistered editors having "fun", inserting "Margaret Thatcher" and "Donald Trump" as fight opponents. Schazjmd (talk) 00:06, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 00:38, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by new accounts and IPs. RolandR (talk) 01:05, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not enough activity to justify indefinite protection. ‑Scottywong| [confer] || 01:07, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Edit warring by probable sockpuppet to restore unreferenced content, page recently semi-protected for same reason. FDW777 (talk) 13:35, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Ran a check, user doesn't appear to be a sock of the past sock on that page. Semi-protection will not prevent them from editing the page; recommend trying to resolve the dispute with the user. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:26, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Edit war going on between IP who is combining multiple natoional team appearances into one, rather than keeping separate. RedPatchBoy (talk) 18:08, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 23:23, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Increase of IP vandalism, BLP issues and known socking over the last few days. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 18:20, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 23:27, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing and vandalism in recent days. MPFitz1968 (talk) 18:40, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 23:28, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Slow-motion edit war between various IP addresses over lead content / WP:SPOILER. I've opened a talk page discussion, hopefully some time (a couple weeks maybe?) of semi will drive some IPs there to talk it over. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 19:29, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 23:28, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated addition of unsourced content in the article. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 19:35, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 23:29, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs edit-warring as to whether to refer to his death as reported or factual. BLP/BDP implications. Some good IP edits coming through too, though, so requesting PC instead of semi. Tamzin (they/them) | o toki tawa mi. 23:26, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Luk. GorillaWarfare (talk) 23:32, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism/POV-pushing by IPs. The Banner talk 09:26, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not sure I can see the justification for indefinite protection. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:44, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP vandals are back again. CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 16:34, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:58, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 16:40, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and blocked one of the IP vandals. GorillaWarfare (talk) 23:03, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by someone who uses a different account every time they mess with it. NoonboryKedabory (talk) 1:29, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. This is primarily coming from one IP range (Special:Contributions/2001:818:E69D:EA00::/64) and could be better addressed with a rangeblock if necessary. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:02, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

16 November 2020

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of unconstructive IP editing, including vandalism from an IP hopper (the one with "God said to me..."). High visibility. Jasper Deng (talk) 18:14, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:27, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP users and multiple newly-created accounts. RA0808 talkcontribs 19:20, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've also blocked the accounts which were vandalising it. Hut 8.5 19:25, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP editors trying to add that Turf Moor is/is not Jordan North's happy place. Schazjmd (talk) 21:52, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:55, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Middle Eastern cuisine and cultures

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: WP:ARBPIA as it was part of Arab-Israeli article and related contents. 36.68.195.164 (talk) 20:04, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Looking at these, they don't seem closely related to the dispute between Israel and its neighbors, and any content in them which is related to that dispute doesn't justify protecting all the other parts. If there's ongoing disruption at one of them, we can do temporary protection as usual, but there's no reason to protect these preemptively. Wug·a·po·des 10:52, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandal IPs from Canada replacing the native/regional language of Rajasthan which is Rajasthani to Punjabi. See [38], [39], [40], [41]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:02, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 12:14, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of vandalism by IPs and new editors. Many of the latest edits have been reversions of vandalism and edit warring. Pamzeis (talk) 12:30, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits for more than a week. Please re-report if disruption picks back up. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:10, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent spamming / sock-puppetry. Apart from one editor doing a minor edit, every single edit in the past year from non-extended-confirmed accounts has been to maliciously change the URL from the official site to a spam referral site [42]. The sock farm is that of Jouletale, and nobody notices these malicious link changes until like two weeks later. This has been going on for a year now, with new socks appearing every two weeks, with no end in sight. Spam blacklisting in-effective due to new URLs being created in their place. – Thjarkur (talk) 10:03, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 18:52, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive and abusive vandalism. KidAd talk 20:42, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: It looks like the recent disruptive users have been blocked; is this still needed? GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:01, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Had been semi-protected for a week and had just expired. Seems prudent to re-protect. Fuzheado | Talk 06:40, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. This article is being inundated by edits of labelling of Nazism. Tytrox (talk) 06:47, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 12:13, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is constantly/occasionally vandalized by unregistered or newly registered users. Sanglahi86 (talk) 08:22, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 12:16, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Widely substituted. HurricaneTracker495 (talk) 01:55, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is this really necessary? It hasn't been edited at all since 2016. -- MelanieN (talk) 01:04, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Dreamy Jazz: You recently protected similar pages such as Template:Uw-spam1. I have no idea what should be done with these but am happy with the idea of protection if you would like to do it. Johnuniq (talk) 02:03, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Johnuniq, to give you a bit of background, the reason I went round and initially semi protected is after the discussion at User talk:Wugapodes § protection of user warning templates. Based on the discussion we both thought semi protection is justifiable for templates used by twinkle or redwarn (which are not recently created) as by their very use in twinkle or redwarn for a year or so would have given them enough substitutions to merit at least semi protection. It was also noted by Oshwah that with warning templates LTAs have noticed that if a warning template is unprotected, they can use that to spread their vandalism (their comment). Perhaps Oshwah might want to weigh in here?
For the uw-spam templates, I extended the idea as from my experience uw-spam is used fairly often, with a search result for a part of the warning text bringing up 48,617 uses on user talk pages. Although this isn't transclusions and the search results will bring up a fair few results which are not what we want, it doesn't include where someone has then removed the warning later on. My thoughts were that if the template substitutions which are still present on user talk pages are 9 times more than, if it was transcluded a bot would protect, the template is being used often enough for template protection.
In regards to this protection request, the search result only brings up 4539 on user talk pages. I'll have a think about this one, but I don't think its as high use as the spam template. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 13:37, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Template protected indefinitely. We have to handle this and despite reservations above have chosen consistency (like above, it is used by Twinkle and RedWarn). Johnuniq (talk) 04:12, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Hoppeboy13 (talk) 23:27, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Non-admin comment Hoppeboy13, Indefinite full protection cannot be used when protecting the pages that have persistent vandalism. So why not requesting semi-protection instead? 182.1.236.196 (talk) 23:53, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:35, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Has been the subject of many acts of whitewashing to remove the accurate descriptor of "conspiracy theorist" (e.g. [43]), against consensus on the talk page. Previous month-long protection was helpful. Also subject to other worrying vandalism ([44][45]). — Bilorv (talk) 02:47, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:06, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent spamming with personal links. ZimZalaBim talk 18:45, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:45, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:03, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent vandalism. 36.68.195.164 (talk) 20:53, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editor partially blocked from editing Ivana Trump, doesn't look like protection is needed —valereee (talk) 21:09, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, i think that user is partially blocked. So, i withdraw this requests. 36.68.195.164 (talk) 21:38, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:01, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Gotitbro (talk) 03:49, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:04, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP continues to make PoV vandalistic edits to strip & whitewash the article. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:50, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:01, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Recurring IP vandalism; vandal(s) use differing IP addresses to insert factual errors. Requesting the page be semi-protected for an indefinite period; quality contributions to the page are coming from registered users. Dmoore5556 (talk) 00:15, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:36, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unsourced content and constant unexplained removals. -- /Alex/21 00:20, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:37, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple attempts to vandalise over the past day. Hunter 00:41, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:38, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content from new and IP users. Emperork (talk) 00:56, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:39, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 1989 (talk) 00:59, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:40, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:05, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Just one problem user, who has been given a final warning. Let me or anyone know if they do it again. MelanieN (talk) 22:19, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 19:57, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:32, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs are making some disruptive edits, please protect for maybe around three days, then it'll be over. They are adding unsourced content as well. Paul Vaurie (talk) 22:18, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:27, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous protracted vandalism based on changing information about height and spouse. Hunter 22:20, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:29, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Just as he was resigned from the President of Peru, IP vandals take the advantage by adding unsourced and dubious information. This article also been updated for the blurb in WP:ITN. 36.68.195.164 (talk) 22:26, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator MelanieN. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:29, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – As mentioned on Talk page, there is disruptive editing, content disputes, and as mentioned in [|Talk:Straight-through processing#Request for comment], a consensus that all references to Mr Karat should be removed from this page. Temporary semi-protection was requested and granted in March 2019. It was removed in April 2019, and an anonymous user added back in the reference to Mr Karat. Temporary semi-protection was requested and granted in May 2019. It was removed in June 2019, and an anonymous user added back in the reference to Mr Karat. The unverifiable information was again removed in September 2019, only to re-appear 8 September 2020 by an anonymous user with comment "Added factually proven evidence" which this clearly is not.

I think that Temporary semi-protection for 1 year would again be effective. Jedison brussels (talk) 22:33, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:34, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 23:05, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:34, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, regarding her death. Appears one user uploaded photos of her death. DMT biscuit (talk) 19:02, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:54, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disruption due to the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, most likely new IPs/users arriving due to the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. HistoryofIran (talk) 19:17, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It does indeed Mr. Bot, removed it - ty xd. --HistoryofIran (talk) 19:34, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:59, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from newly created accounts. Drovethrughosts (talk) 21:56, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also blocked the slew of obvious sockpuppets. GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:51, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 18:36, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator MelanieN. GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:43, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Literally about to launch and vandalism in near past. Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 20:56, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I'm not seeing much recent vandalism? —valereee (talk) 21:03, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs repeatedly adding term to infobox that is specifically prohibited by the infobox instructions. DuncanHill (talk) 21:39, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:47, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

17 November 2020

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. (CC) Tbhotch 19:08, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by requestor User blocked. (CC) Tbhotch 19:42, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. (CC) Tbhotch 19:09, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by requestor User blocked. (CC) Tbhotch 19:42, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. (CC) Tbhotch 19:11, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by requestor User blocked. (CC) Tbhotch 19:42, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. (CC) Tbhotch 19:14, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by requestor User blocked. (CC) Tbhotch 19:43, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent removal of the blocked message by multiple IP's and accounts. Eyebeller (talk) 19:23, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:41, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent recreation of articled deleted through AFD. Onel5969 TT me 19:37, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:42, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism of that page by the Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Thai gun hoaxster. The page history consists almost exclusively of reverts of his vandalisms.--Le Petit Chat (talk) 19:42, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Starting with a long but temporary protection to see if they lose interest before going to indef. GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:44, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: idem --Le Petit Chat (talk) 19:43, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Starting with a long but temporary protection to see if they lose interest before going to indef. GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:46, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism from multiple IP addresses/accounts. –Gladamas (talk · contribs) 20:06, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Widr. GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:46, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations. Binksternet (talk) 22:37, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ponyo. GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:48, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: As every year, high level of IP vandalism is certain to occur tomorrow when the draft takes place. See block requests for Obi Toppin, James Wiseman above for related vandalism. If a preemptive block is not possible, I suggests admins to keep a close eye on the page starting tomorrow around noon ET. bender235 (talk) 22:39, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:49, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi/pending changes protection: - frequent BLP violations/edit warring over the date of birth by IPs and new users going back years. Surprised this hasn't already been requested; I see 16 changes tagged as birth date change since January. Jr8825Talk 22:42, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:49, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. KidAd talk 19:17, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Cwmhiraeth. GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:26, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous vandalism, disruptive editing and POVPUSH by IPs and new accounts. Article is under WP:ARBIPA sanctions on India/Pakistan. Asking for some long-term protection here as the vandalisms/disruptions are unlikely to stop, article being a part of the high-profile Kashmir conflict. Gotitbro (talk) 20:23, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:28, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism add was unsourced or not official released by the article. Barneysss (talk) 16:50, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected until January 1, 2021. GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:30, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Rafaelchan118 (talk) 16:57, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ToBeFree. GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:31, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP and new account vandalism. blindlynx (talk) 17:20, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:26, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism recently related to nationality. --IndexAccount (talk) 17:28, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month (Deni) and 1 week (Zufer), after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:34, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 18:14, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:35, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term semi-protection: Page sees constant traffic by vandal IPs inserting fake information about fake sequels, and almost all edits for this page revolve around either vandal IPs inserting hoax information or reverting of such vandalisms.--Mr Fink (talk) 18:48, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:36, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Significant disruptive editing by IPs and SPAs. User:Namiba 19:01, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:36, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. User:Namiba 19:02, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:38, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Extended-confirmed protection just expired on this page related to a very contentious issue that is still in the public eye due to ongoing focus on the US elections. Would recommend protecting at least through January 21, if not longer. GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:17, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. as arbitration enforcement--Ymblanter (talk) 22:22, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Ymblanter as long as it is unprotected, there were attempts to change American to British spelling in this article, which is the violation of MOS:ENGVAR (ex. Center to centre, characterized to characterised). 36.76.234.133 (talk) 22:27, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Template:POTD/2016-09-25/2 was never on the Main Page—instead, protected page created by AnomieBOT III was used. See deletion log of Template:POTD protected/2016-09-25. Protecting admin Crisco 1492 is retired. —⁠andrybak (talk) 23:50, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Woody (talk) 22:26, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Template:POTD/2016-09-25/3 was never on the Main Page—instead, protected page created by AnomieBOT III was used. See deletion log of Template:POTD protected/2016-09-25. Protecting admin Crisco 1492 is retired. —⁠andrybak (talk) 23:53, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Woody (talk) 22:26, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lengthy semi-protection: For at least a year now, the editing history of this article has been dominated by single-purpose accounts, almost entirely unregistered or new accounts that make only a few edits only to this article. They add news items, trivia, or promotional material. I think that some of this editing was connected to this large collection of sockpuppets but that was a very large and messy case so I'm having trouble finding the exact account(s). In any case, this is a persistent problem and it's clear that one or more people associated with the subject are routinely editing the article to promote the subject. Since they're all unregistered or new accounts, semi-protection would largely address the problem with minimal disruption. ElKevbo (talk) 16:56, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:22, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NBA transfers

Temporary semi-protection: Addition of WP:RSBREAKING content, which goes against WP:SPORTSTRANS. – Sabbatino (talk) 18:56, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:25, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Over the last few days, the page has been repeatedly edited by IPs in the 41.114. range. Edits have no value and are either vandalism or someone using the article as a template for creating a balance sheet. Little point blocking the latest IP and a rangeblock here would probably be too broad. ninety:one 22:13, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Non-admin comment Ninetyone, since vandalism all come from same IP range as you stats (41.114.0.0/17), i prefer to report all these users to AIV and these IP now was blocked. 36.76.234.133 (talk) 22:46, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
ToBeFree has taken care of matters. Drmies (talk) 22:48, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, there was a RFPP request :) Thanks ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:44, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:44, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: High level of persistent IP disruptive editing, removal of content, and vandalism by various anonymous IPs. GenoV84 (talk) 16:43, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 21:04, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IDHT vandal. Jorm (talk) 20:09, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Making valid edits with sources is not vandalism. Your reverts based on personal attacks and your own ideology are what is vandalism. 76.69.3.70 (talk) 20:15, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Izno. and IP editor partially blocked from the page for 48h by GeneralNotability. GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:18, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: repeated vandalism by IP. IHateAccounts (talk) 21:59, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:16, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – BLP violations by IP and newly registered editors. Darren-M talk 22:15, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:20, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 23:51, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:20, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Constant adding of future speculative unsourced info by IP users. Bollyjeff | talk 00:40, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:26, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Please see the recent history of changes between "Tigray" and "Amhara," among others since August 2020. - tucoxn\talk 02:43, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:44, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 14:16, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:51, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by anonymous editors; continued ignorance of MOS:TABLECAPTION and MOS:DTAB guideline requirements. livelikemusic (TALK!) 13:57, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, seems to have stopped.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:42, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User with no account constantly adds unsourced, incorrect information to this page. Information includes club details from 2011, when the player was eleven years old. He was not playing men's football at 11 years old. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 16:30, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only two spells of minor disruption this year, spaced more than a month apart. Kosack (talk) 09:40, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Eyebeller (talk) 20:15, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:07, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by against talk decisions on page Eldhose Talk 14:55, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Kosack (talk) 09:33, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent page edit with unconfirmed news by unregistered users. Reverted a lot of revisions in the last 5 days because of IPs editing the page without citing the official confirmation source. DrFebusInc 08:27, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:55, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EN-Jungwon (talk) 09:08, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:51, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Expect many NBA-related requests this week. User:Namiba 14:27, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Kosack (talk) 08:40, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant adding of un-cited information regarding the season schedule. –Piranha249 15:16, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., disruption is not so frequent, let us try pending changes.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:46, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalized shortly after protection expired. ― Tartan357 Talk 02:46, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. A little early right now to be jumping back into protection. Two reverts in the last week, one of which seems like an attempt to be constructive. Kosack (talk) 08:39, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed protection: Arab-Israeli conflict. 95.49.71.2 (talk) 11:46, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Protection is not mandatory to enforce editing restrictions. No recent evidence of issues on this page suggests that protection is necessary. ‑Scottywong| [spill the beans] || 07:00, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editors are edit warring to remove every citation in the article and restore an unsourced essay. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:18, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 09:50, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EN-Jungwon (talk) 08:36, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 09:56, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is constantly/occasionally vandalized by unregistered or newly registered users. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:31, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Article is already PC protected, vandalism edits are sparse. ‑Scottywong| [comment] || 06:47, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unreference content by IP socks. FDW777 (talk) 10:46, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [prattle] || 06:51, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism to a BLP. DuncanHill (talk) 15:02, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 09:36, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – On-going, long-term vandalism to page by anonymous, sock-hopping editor—who also edited on a short-term account (JJonathan1989 (talk · contribs)). Addition of false, unsourced content, which has been changed per year (yet maintains the same information as true), stemming from 2017. livelikemusic (TALK!) 16:10, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 09:44, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Newslinger talk 09:44, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent unconstructive IP edits. KyleJoantalk 17:22, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 09:23, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Recent IP vandalism. Wikibenboy94 (talk) 17:34, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 09:38, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same user who thinks this show is made for BBC instead of PBS is at it again. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 05:55, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 09:36, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lightbluerain (Talk | contribs) 19:04, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deleted the page as a negative BLP about a non-notable subject. GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:57, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done (so the bot will clear it off the list) ‑Scottywong| [confess] || 06:42, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism has seemingly returned. 1980fast (talk) 05:07, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [comment] || 06:46, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. (CC) Tbhotch 19:52, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Editor blocked. Drmies (talk) 22:58, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 22:41, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Joeykai, seriously--there were TWO vandal edits; RFPP reports take a lot of time. Drmies (talk) 22:49, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Has been created three times, and considering Scott's fanbase, it's likely to continue barring protection. O.N.R. (talk) 05:28, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected ‑Scottywong| [yak] || 06:41, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Salt the earth - An IP vandal keeps creating attack pages on this title. There is no existing article at this title. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Takes a strong man to deny... 07:20, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Page has been deleted. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 12:15, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Voice of Clam . Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:32, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continued pre-emptive editing immediatly after previous protection expired. (adding Joe Biden despite him not being president yet).
SSSB (talk) 09:35, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also request for enforcement of WP:ARBDS. --IanDBeacon (talk) 18:34, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
And please request to impose 1RR as a warning for IPs that distrupt the page. 36.76.234.133 (talk) 19:14, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected Drmies (talk) 22:59, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP and new user vandalism. Chariotrider555 (talk) 17:37, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:28, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Spam prevention. User, over two IP addresses, adding links leading to one commercial domain name registration website to at least three different articles, four times to this one. Largoplazo (talk) 17:37, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Liz. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:28, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing over last few days. Hummerrocket (talk) 20:22, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Drmies (talk) 22:58, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. RolandR (talk) 21:49, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Drmies. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:30, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

18 November 2020

Semi-protection: Persistant IP vandalism. The last edit contained racial slurs. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 03:53, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. IP blocked for two weeks, please re-report if disruption picks back up. -- LuK3 (Talk) 17:59, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Babymissfortune 07:15, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:56, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. To be specific the IPs are adding biased language and unsourced materials. Jon698 (talk) 20:01, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:59, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Regular persistent vandalism by IP users. Ahmetlii (talk) 10:36, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:41, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Very creative vandalism, but pretty clearly vandalism. GRuban (talk) 17:58, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:00, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Request at RMT, Hakob Hakobyan (footballer, born 1997) needs to be moved to this title. ─ The Aafī (talk) 19:19, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – Muboshgu (talk) 19:34, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Widely substituted. I've used it dozens of times, and is frequently transcluded substituted. HurricaneTracker495 (talk) 18:39, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. No disruption in the years it's been semi-protected. Wug·a·po·des 00:00, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: or possibly PC protection. This page gets a constant stream of links to non-notable programming languages, languages with one user, and things that aren't programming languages at all. This is a mature list and at this point in history it is rare for a notable new language to be created. --Guy Macon (talk) 09:39, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., let us see how this protection works--Ymblanter (talk) 11:44, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Two new accounts making largely promotional (and some factually incorrect) edits to a politician's bio (both accounts are doing the same on he.wiki). I suspect there is a WP:COI issue here. Number 57 10:50, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:39, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly Visible Template. Widely substituted. HurricaneTracker495 (talk) 18:47, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. No disruption through semi-protection, in the last 6ish months. Wug·a·po·des 23:58, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – No evidence of notability per WP:NSONGS. Overzealous user keeps recreating. The song title/page is incorrectly titled too. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 21:48, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:45, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DoebLoggs (talk) 09:59, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:01, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Lot of single purpose accounts and IPs vandalising the article. Beshogur (talk) 17:39, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:23, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Page has been pending changes protected for almost seven years with little to no recent vandalism to speak of. The subject of the article is no longer an active football coach. Is pending changes protection really necessary? Simmyrak (talk) 01:16, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected Every edit in the last two months has been reverted. Woody (talk) 22:30, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Page has been pending changes protected for five years with little to no recent vandalism to speak of. The subject of the article is no longer an active football player. Is pending changes protection really necessary? Simmyrak (talk) 01:19, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected In the last 6 months, two edits have not been reverted. Most of the rest are BLP violations. Woody (talk) 22:33, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Page has been pending changes protected for almost seven years with little to no recent vandalism to speak of. The subject of the article is no longer an active racing driver. Is pending changes protection really necessary? Simmyrak (talk) 01:22, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected See above Woody (talk) 22:35, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Page has been pending changes protected for over six years with little to no recent vandalism to speak of. The subject of the article is no longer an active basketball player. Is pending changes protection really necessary? Simmyrak (talk) 01:54, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected See above, in the last 6 months, most edits have been reverted with a number of egregious BLP violations. Woody (talk) 22:36, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of vandalism and disruptive editing. I think the article will benefit from page protection for a while. Scorpions13256 (talk) 02:27, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Non-admin comment Scorpions13256, i think vandalism only happens in a single IP range (110.170.144.xx) and already reported in AIV. Let see whether the user is rangeblocked or not. 180.244.189.223 (talk) 05:34, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 06:45, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Anon IP reverts changes endlessly. PhoenixSuns8-0 (talk) 03:17, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 06:46, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Since the premiere episode nearly a week ago this article has seen the constant addition of unsourced content (primarily cast members not confirmed to appear). As former cast members have been announced to recur throughout the season it probably needs some long-term but still temporary semi-protection until it can be confirmed exactly which are returning. TheDoctorWho (talk) 03:47, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:47, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 03:55, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:51, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Elmssuper 05:38, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:52, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Player has reportedly been signed by another team but the team has not announced it yet and we do not make these updates until that does happen, but IP addresses do not know this and they keep adding it. Rockchalk717 06:09, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:53, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Being edited a lot for the show's Season 2 announcement which doesn't seem to exist in media. Csgir (talk) 06:20, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:55, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations. Binksternet (talk) 23:20, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Non-admin comment Binksternet, I see there are only one user which is IP (184.15.174.16) that vandalize the article and already reported to AIV. So let see whether the user is blocked. 36.76.234.133 (talk) 23:40, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. IP blocked for 31 hours who caused the disruption. Please re-report if disruption picks back up. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:46, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP & new account vandalism. 100+ edits today. Adakiko (talk) 05:06, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Mz7.. bibliomaniac15 05:28, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Larry Hockett (Talk) 05:19, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 05:27, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection or Pending changes protection: Significantly increased activity and vandalism due to recent news. Twassman (talk) 01:02, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Wug·a·po·des 02:06, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page just came off a month of ECP, which means it lost the indefinite semiprotection it had before. Missvain added pending changes, but it's already becoming clear that that will be far too much of a burden to deal with. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:42, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question I believe this page already pending-changes protected and its working as now. But i believe there are high prequency of edits that IP need to edit to page, sometimes to vandalize it. Whats wrong with PC protection ? 180.244.122.213 (talk) 01:46, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Pending changes does not work well to pages with a high frequency of edits. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:15, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. Wug·a·po·des 02:14, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content by IPs. 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 02:14, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:16, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 19:38, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Users blocked. -- LuK3 (Talk) 22:55, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 19:38, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Users blocked. -- LuK3 (Talk) 22:56, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 19:39, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Users blocked. -- LuK3 (Talk) 22:56, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Extreme POV pushing by an user. Beshogur (talk) 22:46, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:50, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Elizium23 (talk) 23:01, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Recent disruption was all from one IP, though it was too long ago for me to want to consider blocking them. GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:29, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Salt. Persistent recreation of false song. (CC) Tbhotch 17:09, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Deleted the page. The person who created the page both times has been blocked, so I'm not sure SALTing is needed at this point. GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:32, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – straight vandalism and bad edits since un-protection this morning. Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 00:26, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:05, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Player rumored to be in transaction. User:Namiba 19:18, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done The trade seems to have been announced. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:02, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection - Constant POV editing and edit-warring by IP WP:SPA accounts. Love of Corey (talk) 01:02, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This is really a content dispute. Please continue to discuss the issues on the talk page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:47, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. (CC) Tbhotch 15:27, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:57, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Influx of disruption/edit warring/blanking by a bunch of IPs (similar range, but too wide to block). Blablubbs (talkcontribs) 20:42, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:01, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:01, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

19 November 2020

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP user is cycling through multiple IP addresses and attempts to perform disruptive edits on this template. Recommend temporary protection for 1 week. Haleth (talk) 12:55, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:47, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP user is cycling through multiple IP addresses and performing disruptive editing on the template, along with another related template. Recommend temporary page protection for 1 week. Haleth (talk) 12:56, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:48, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Ed talk! 17:18, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 19:36, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Ongoing vandalism, page has already been protected numerous times in the past. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 20:33, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 20:44, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Why is this fully protected? It has a potential for email redirect abuse, but extended confirmed users can be trusted with this. 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 03:12, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@AGK: any thoughts as the protecting administrator. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 13:26, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Not done This is fully protected for good reason; to prevent people from mistakenly posting oversight requests to it which in turn increases the visibility of sensitive information. There are no circumstances in which anyone other than members of the OS team or WMF staff should ever need to edit this page, so full protection doesn't cause any issues; this is not a part of the encyclopedia, and as such "anyone can edit" doesn't apply. ‑ Iridescent 13:34, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) It was fully protected to prevent users placing requests for oversight on that page, something which I think an uninformed extended confirmed user might think to do. I don't necessarily want to remove the full protection, though template editor protection might be useful here? It didn't exist when the page was fully protected, so perhaps it might be worth considering as a step down of protection. I would only want to really see full or template protection for this page, with a preference for full protection as template protection is primarily meant for templates. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 13:42, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
After resolving the edit conflict Iridescent explains my thoughts better. No non-oversighter should really ever edit this page and as all oversighters are administrators (from memory), full protection isn't an issue for the oversighters who need to edit the page. Although template editors are a small group of trusted editors, they shouldn't need to edit this page so I don't really see a benefit to reducing to template protection. I mentioned template protection as an option as editors with the template editor realistically should know that oversight requests are done via email or if they don't they should read the TE protected page before making edits. Template editors should generally get consensus for controversial changes, so they are unlikely to be making any particular controversial changes. However, as they shouldn't really be editing the page for any reason, they can make edit requests and this page should ideally remain fully protected (so also  Not done from me). Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 13:51, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User request. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 22:05, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question: @Destroyeraa: I'm not sure I'm seeing sufficient reason to protect the page -- can you elaborate a bit? GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:47, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@GorillaWarfare: There’s this very annoying vandal who likes to harass constructive editors, such as me and Favonian. The vandal is now blocked, though the Ip address is highly volatile and the IP will come back. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 23:10, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Aside from the recent edits from the now-blocked IP, I don't think I'm seeing enough recent disruption to justify protection. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:44, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@GorillaWarfare: The IP is a LTA IP vandal, and comes back often to disrespect religious figures and vandalizing cyclone articles. It's getting annoying, and several other people (User talk:Jasper Deng, User talk:LightandDark2000) have talk pages semi-protected. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 15:14, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent high level of IP vandalism. XRedParrot (talk) 05:58, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. - most actual recent IP vandalism was caused in a single burst just over a day ago Nosebagbear (talk) 10:58, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs repeatedly adding a product placement shot in an effort to advertise. MrOllie (talk) 14:24, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | tålk 16:38, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 15:14, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | tålk 16:35, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Contentious political figure with long edit history of gross vandalism. Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 21:13, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One editor has been blocked and the point raised by User:JamboJuice should be discussed on the talk page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:12, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sports talk show host, subject absurd vandalism, most recently by a user who was temporarily blocked for vandalizing a different sports-related article.EdJF (talk) 21:39, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The bizarre vandalism is too infrequent to justify semi-protecting the article. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:03, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Wanton additions by hopping IP. Tgeorgescu (talk) 06:53, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Additions are not vandalism. Issue is mainly a single IP and another editor edit-warring and could be handled without page protection Nosebagbear (talk) 10:49, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 15:54, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., given the usually low rate of edits. @Tbhotch:, you could also knock the editors on the knuckles and start a Talk Page discussion on the edit-warring component, as the previous two in the last 14 years sort of guttered out without conclusion Nosebagbear (talk) 10:45, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Colby Howard etc. IP editor targeting a few favorite pages

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism by same small set of IPs including 2600:1010:b109:7cfc:89bc:bbdd:1186:9ace (talk · contribs), 2600:1010:b1d4:91f0:9deb:2bd1:c470:fdf0 (talk · contribs), 2600:1010:b14d:adfb:3038:e3d4:49bc:c2f0 (talk · contribs), and more in that /40, 174.222.11.101 (talk · contribs), along with some now-blocked logged-in editors davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 22:56, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I took care of Howard too - thanks for checking. Acroterion (talk) 22:59, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done – for the bot. Favonian (talk) 11:24, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Tag-team or IP-hopping vandalism. Toddst1 (talk) 06:38, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nosebagbear (talk) 10:55, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Must be protected indefinitely. Consistent vandalism. Gilbert.JW (talk) 12:04, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of Indefinitely, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Given that even the most recent protection of a year, including after his retirement, and the issues are still ongoing. Nosebagbear (talk) 10:36, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been recieving large masses of vandalism from registerd users and IP users alike just today from users changing the team he plays for toimprudently changing his name. ₛₒₘₑBₒdyₐₙyBₒdy₀₅ (talk) 16:09, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:28, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP Vandals replacing "Rajasthani (the native/regional tongue of Rajasthan) for "Punjabi". They'd been doing the same for quite a few days now. See [46], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:55, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:22, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IPs. Some1 (talk) 14:02, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 09:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. 11Fox11 (talk) 04:45, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 09:10, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: People with COI (User:Kalariwarrior and User:Kalari Poothara, they are practitioners, are they the same person?) are misusing the pending-changes protection, they are tweaking, whitewashing and removing content as they wish without sourcing, also removal of sourced content. As long as it is pending protected they are not going to participate in discussion, but misuse it. Currently this is propaganda article. Look at that article, it's mostly poorly sourced and half of the content is unsourced. Admin suggested to report here. 2409:4073:485:3714:65A9:FED8:675C:80E4 (talk) 18:41, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined In fact, I think pending changes is working as intended. Consider starting a discussion at Talk:Kalaripayattu if there's disagreement. Airplaneman (talk) 03:31, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

full protection: vandalism against talk discussions. Eldhose Talk 08:16, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Wug·a·po·des 02:50, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. IceWelder [] 12:02, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Stale since it hasn't picked up again in 12 hours. If it starts up again (which it shouldn't) let me know and I'll issue some blocks. Wug·a·po·des 02:58, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP repeatedly adding unsourced material. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Airplaneman (talk) 03:18, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SK2242 (talk) 02:19, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Airplaneman (talk) 03:11, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 12:16, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Various IPs are also adding serious BLP violations to the article in addition to the vandalism. JJP...MASTER!...MASTER!!! master of puppets, i'm pulling your strings (0-3-5)[talk about or to] JJP... master? master? where's the dreams that i've been after (0-3-6-5) 13:32, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Cabayi. Airplaneman (talk) 04:36, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: With the 2020 NBA draft, a lot of IP users are jumping the gun, adding him to their favorite team's roster (see edit history). Please semi-protect for 24 hrs. bender235 (talk) 18:44, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For god's sake, where are the administrators here? Vandalism has been rampant on this article over the past hours. --bender235 (talk) 01:24, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Bender235: I'm of the opinion we need more administrators. This is but one example why. Airplaneman (talk) 04:38, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DannyS712 (talk) 22:28, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Drmies. 1 year. Airplaneman (talk) 03:36, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruption of sourced content mostly by IPs and one-off accounts. Has been going on continuously for quite some time, a mid-term semi should be okay here. Gotitbro (talk) 22:37, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 03:38, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unsourced additions as well as rumours by IPs to a BLP. D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 22:39, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Drmies. 2 weeks. Airplaneman (talk) 03:35, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dynamic IP vandalizing the page. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 23:20, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 03:34, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP repeatedly adding unsourced vote totals, and other disruptive edits by IPs and new editors. ― Tartan357 Talk 23:56, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I think the edit rate is low enough to try PC here. Airplaneman (talk) 03:33, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Airplaneman, the same editor just tried to restore their unsourced change. It's still in pending status. I'll leave them another warning. Could you please reject the change and leave them a warning, as well? ― Tartan357 Talk 04:52, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
A PC reviewer accepted it, and I reverted them. Maybe semi-protection would be better for an article in a topic area with as much disruption as national US politics. ― Tartan357 Talk 05:08, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Tartan357: You're right. My logic in applying pending changes protection was that it was important for people to have the opportunity to edit, but if questionable changes are making it through the PC process in this sensitive subject area, semiprotection is best. I've given it a week of semiprotection. Pending changes will still run the full month. Airplaneman (talk) 17:48, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Airplaneman, perfect, thanks. ― Tartan357 Talk 23:03, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by IP users after reverts by multiple editors. KaitoNkmra23 talk 09:19, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I feel bad for the helpful IP there, but I think it was too much for blocks. Wug·a·po·des 02:53, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 19:42, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 22:32, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Rugby player did something stupid, multiple IP editors vandalising article. Schazjmd (talk) 02:16, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 03:14, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. And highly visible due to his recent death. 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 02:29, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 03:08, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent IP vandalism. TornadoLGS (talk) 03:12, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Wow, this is the highest edit rate I've seen in a while for this kind of vandalism. Airplaneman (talk) 03:16, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

20 November 2020

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sockpuppets of User:Никита-Родин-2002 keep on editing this page. Dq209 (talk) 14:38, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:46, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from at least one IP editor: continued addition of non-notable cast. Note that these edits go back to at least Aug 2020: [52]. --IJBall (contribstalk) 15:03, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:52, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism in light of recent news coverage. Einsof (talk) 15:05, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:56, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent vandalism by editor using multiple IPs. ― Tartan357 Talk 08:14, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:26, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Subtle vandalism by multiple IPs. ― Tartan357 Talk 08:34, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:37, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Too much disruption lately these last few months, with IPs and new accounts mainly attempting to force various kinds of flags onto the infobox. HistoryofIran (talk) 10:56, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:40, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – No need for this redirect. a gd fan (talk) 18:07, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The deletion log for this page appears to be pulling in records for a different page, possibly a page created at this title before Draft: was a separate namespace, evidence of some kind of database error. The recently-deleted page has actually only ever been created twice: once four years ago, and once about a month ago. Both instances were harmless, so I don't think protection is needed. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:13, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent addition of unsourced content by long-time sock-hopping IP that edits across multiple The Real Housewives franchises, concerning viewership numbers. livelikemusic (TALK!) 23:54, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. IP edits were in good-faith, if unsourced. You added the source. Problem solved. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:44, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 02:40, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. The editor was blocked on one IP and edited from a diferrent one, leading to a range block. I've extended the duration of the range block to match the duration of the original block as this was clearly deliberate evasion. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:47, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalized by new IP after protection expired. ― Tartan357 Talk 08:10, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:44, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalized by new IP after protection expired. ― Tartan357 Talk 08:13, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:46, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Binksternet (talk) 19:28, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined appears to be a content dispute, and no edits since yesterday. Is the IP trying to write about a different band with the same name? Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:27, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple instances of vandalism, unsourced or irrelevant edits from anonymous users, and some users potentially cycling through multiple IP addresses to perform multiple disruptive and biased edits. Requesting increase in page protection. Recommend increase in page protection for 6 months. Kalariwarrior (talk) 21:06, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Recent IP edits seem to be largely constructive; the only recently reverted edit was by an editor with an account. Page is already under pending changes protection, I don't think adding another layer of protection will prevent any disruptive activity at this time. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:32, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Immediate resume of editing behaviour upon last protection ending. livelikemusic (TALK!) 23:51, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One edit does not a pattern make, and that one edit was clearly in good faith anyway. Please see WP:OWN: if you continue reverting all good-faith contributions to the page without discussion you may be yourself blocked from editing. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:39, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 16:07, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Please read WP:NOTVAND, and note that you are expected to provide an edit summary when reverting edits which are not obvious vandalism. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:23, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Increase of disruptive edits from non-logged in users over the past few days; most IP accounts continue to edit-war with other logged-in users despite being asked to contribute to a talk page discussion already open about the subject matter. — Angryjoe1111 (talk) 14:17, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:27, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Page previously being used to spread misinformation about COVID-19, and since fixed, is now getting drive-by IPs who seemed to prefer the misinformation version[53]. Alexbrn (talk) 14:27, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for one year per WP:GS/COVID19, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:35, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Socks and IPs vandalising blocked user's talk. JavaHurricane 08:33, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Already a checkuser investigation in progress; nobody will need to be leaving messages for this person. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:19, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated attempts by many IPs at victim blaming in relation to living and recently deceased people. Extended confirmed protected might be a more preferable option. FDW777 (talk) 09:24, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:20, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent attempts to advertise instagram of the player the article is about (this appears to be the player himself making the edits). IP address is too inconsistent for an IP ban. DylanI00 (talk) 12:36, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:22, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated stuff about the page being used for scams. Rathfelder (talk) 13:32, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:24, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. FDW777 (talk) 15:54, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:10, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent adding of unsourced content and removal of sourced content. TheDeviantPro (talk) 00:40, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:25, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Many many users insisting in renaming without citing a source. PedroLucasDBr (talk) 22:50, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Where's somebody? My request is still not complete since yesterday. PedroLucasDBr (talk) 14:28, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected indefinitely. You can advise editors to use the requested move process to propose a new title. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:36, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: The two lead guys in this band (Wayne Barrett and Mick Rossi) have split up, with Wayne Barrett claiming legal rights to the band name, but IP accounts (I'm guessing they're Mick Rossi) keep vandalizing the page adding "Tribute band" to the band name, and changing the URL to Mick Rossi's personal page. Robman94 (talk) 03:53, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:49, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection I've removed unverified additions regarding Richard Baxter. Recently stuff regarding Baxter was once again added and by an IP address. I rolled back all those edits to the last good edit which is mine. Nothing about Richard Baxter should be added. It will never be able to be sourced. All I'll say is about Baxter is that he has scammed a lot of people out money and into believing Le Studio will be rebuilt. This whole "rebuilding" Le Studio has been going nn for years. The IP could be Baxter. It wouldn't surprise me if it was. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 15:01, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 1 month. EdJohnston (talk) 18:50, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

North Macedonia's WP:SPAs

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP intentional systematic disruption to illustrate nationalist point. Jingiby (talk) 18:40, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – Both articles. EdJohnston (talk) 18:46, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Plagued by vanity additions. Crossroads -talk- 06:16, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:48, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent disruptive editing against talk page discussions, against church history, supreme court mention's, against reference's.

Eldhose Talk 12:54, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 10:48, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Offensive name. 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 17:31, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This article has not been created since 2007, why would it need protection? - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 20:45, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined @4thfile4thrank: Please request protection only for pages that need it. Johnuniq (talk) 09:30, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated disruptive edits by new editors. Likely the same person. Repeatedly adding and removing a single period in the infobox. 04:24, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: problematic editors indeffed. Adakiko (talk) 06:36, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yet another new account doing the above. Adakiko (talk) 11:31, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Zzuuzz. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:48, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Some IP users are adding unsourced contents and removing sourced contents . WhiteFalcon1 (talk) 05:25, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There has been relatively little vandalism since the previous protection expired on 7 November. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:02, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction in protection level: from extended confirmed protection to semi-protection. The talk page is rather quiet and there has not been much issues. The protecting administrator is Yamaguchi先生, looking to add statistics from "The Trade of the Gulf of Aden Ports of Africa in the Nineteeth and Early Twentieth Centuries" by Richard Pankhurst to the Berbera page, is in need of new images as well - very text heavy WanderingGeeljire (talk) 16:53, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging protecting admin @Yamaguchi先生:. Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 16:01, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Procedural, has not been acted upon. Lectonar (talk) 10:47, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Longer semi-protection: Previous protection expired yesterday, and disruptive editing has already restarted. CMD (talk) 06:11, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:24, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition of unsourced genre by IP hopping editor. Robvanvee 06:42, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:11, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – New IP adding same defamatory content that previously got the page protected. ― Tartan357 Talk 08:04, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:32, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 15:37, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:32, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes protection: Constant addition of unsourced content by multiple accounts. The article was recently protected by the addition of unsourced content began once again straight after it was unprotected. — Yours, Berrely • TalkContribs 18:17, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Try to break habit; ask again if persists. Johnuniq (talk) 09:36, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IPs has resumed once again. Needs another temporary protection period, or possibly edit-confirmation protection, to dissuade the behaviour. GUtt01 (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:37, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – widely substituted. HurricaneTracker495 (talk) 14:27, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Johnuniq (talk) 09:40, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly Visible Template. Frequently substituted HurricaneTracker495 (talk) 14:28, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Johnuniq (talk) 09:40, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated insertion of unsourced date of birth (year is not sourced, despite article being moved to the current title). Ravensfire (talk) 15:34, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:28, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection - Constant POV editing by IP users. Love of Corey (talk) 10:36, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for similar reasons as the last request. There's disruption but not at the level I would consider unmanageable for a page with that many editors. Airplaneman (talk) 03:18, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – User:GarrettBese along with IP address editors keep adding uncited and what appears to be untrue information (adding a Kurt Bese as a company executive) to the page. RickyCourtney (talk) 16:34, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Airplaneman (talk) 03:16, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Airplaneman (talk) 03:16, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – more vandalism since I last reported. Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 03:04, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 03:13, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Airplaneman (talk) 03:13, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction in protection level: to allow creation of this page. The page I've created an initial draft for has been marked as 'bad title', however 'Bloody Scotland' is the name of a recognised Scottish crime writing festival [54]. I think the title is justified as the common name of the festival and refers to the bloody nature of crime novels rather than in a pejorative manner against the country of Scotland. The protecting administrator RHaworth's talk page notes that they are inactive. I've created a basic draft at Draft:Bloody_Scotland --Rodti (talk) 14:49, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Not at this time. I don't think the draft is ready for the "mainspace" quite yet. I'll post a note on your talk page about this. Airplaneman (talk) 02:07, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction in protection level: from pp-protected to no.minimal protection. The page is protected due to bad-citations by third parties, but these have been corrupted by third-party reviewers after initial postings that have significantly corrupted this article and the biography of the individual. I have contacted the page administrator, and I have left feedback on the page but looks like it got wiped somehow. The page needs to be cleansed of irrelevant information (minor) and unverifiable sources (minor) to be fully accurate, but those changes are minor in order to be fully accurate. I would ask editing permissions be granted so this can be done, with the oversight of an editor so this page be restored and not so truncated as to do injustice to the sujected and Wikipedia community. My thanks. SaeedEtihad (talk) 14:17pm, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Declined I think Valereee made the right call here. Disagreements over content can be discussed at Talk:Mahni Ghorashi. Airplaneman (talk) 02:27, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. User:Namiba 03:02, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Airplaneman (talk) 01:52, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia(talk) 05:33, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Airplaneman (talk) 01:54, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Elizium23 (talk) 09:25, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commment Elizium23, now, Content dispute/edit warring has revolved into Vandalism from IP. 180.244.189.223 (talk) 10:46, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 02:01, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Airplaneman (talk) 02:01, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent adding of incorrect information. User:Namiba 16:03, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 03:20, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 19:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 03:23, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP users repeatedly adding unsourced and disputed references to Iran. Geoff | Who, me? 17:07, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 02:35, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content, by an IP user, to this BLP. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 17:20, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 02:02, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction in protection level: from semi-protection to no protection. The page is protected due to vandalism, but there is no recent activity on the Talk page or any recent edits. I have contacted the page administrator, but I have received no response. The page is lacking in information and sources.Vierb004 (talk) 15:46, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already unprotected by administrator Xaosflux. Airplaneman (talk) 02:36, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Pending changes protection clearly not sufficient enough. Gilbert.JW (talk) 15:54, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Airplaneman (talk) 01:50, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. User:Namiba 04:03, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 01:53, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – huge flurry of IP vandalism coincidental with the NBA Draft. Toddst1 (talk) 05:41, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 01:56, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. (CC) Tbhotch 06:47, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 01:58, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – history is pretty much all vandalism. Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 19:15, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 01:39, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent spate of disruptive editing on a BLP article, including vandalism and BLP violations. Semiprotection would have some collateral damage (some productive IP edits), but something is needed to filter out the bad edits. Pending changes seems to be the best solution. Hog Farm Bacon 19:39, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 5 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This should cover his next term and then some. Airplaneman (talk) 01:38, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 19:46, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This might be stale, as vandalism stopped soon after this request. 1 day should be more than enough. Airplaneman (talk) 01:36, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This has some kind of protection already, but it's obviously inadequate as contentious edits have been made that have been automatically accepted. Please protect this properly. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:56, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 01:34, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Or maybe even EC. Not a huge number of transclusions, but linked from a few high-visibility pages. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 20:24, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Non-admin comment Suffusion of Yellow, did you see a high level of IP vandalism in the template? IMO, it seems unlikely to protect the template unless there are persistent vandalism or spamming from multiple IP users. 36.68.196.154 (talk) 20:29, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Templates, unlike articles, can be preemptively protected. Joe Biden is indefinitely EC-protected, and will likely remain so for the next 4-8 years, so it makes sense to apply some sort of protection to a template that's transcluded there, particularly if there's been a non-zero level of vandalism. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 20:35, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator JzG. Currently set to expire in February 2021. Airplaneman (talk) 01:32, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing due to the NBA draft selection of the player with the same name. --DragonFederal (talk) 12:47, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 21:31, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 19:43, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Once again, a new editor is trying to declare that Cohen is not a real Jew. There is a talk page section on this, and I've pointed to MOS:IDENTITY before. Also, recent blanking of content by an IP. ― Tartan357 Talk 23:13, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 01:30, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 23:32, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator JzG. Airplaneman (talk) 01:27, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP under attack by multiple IP editors (a few IP editors also helping by reverting). Schazjmd (talk) 00:11, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ponyo. Airplaneman (talk) 01:24, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Started from 5 days ago, still disruptive editing happening. Hummerrocket (talk) 01:00, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 01:26, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is getting vandalized all the time. See the history. I think that this page needs to be protected indefinitely, otherwise every other week it will have to be protected with a request like this one. Paul Vaurie (talk) 01:10, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Airplaneman (talk) 01:22, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

21 November 2020

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Donnowin1 (talk) 09:41, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 21:57, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Babymissfortune 10:15, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 21:57, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of constant IP vandalism and persistant persistant disruptive editing by the rival fanbases. The vandalism was controlled until the previous protection expired. Debankan Mullick (talk) 11:27, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 21:58, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – 대우건설,start at November. MCC214#ex umbra in solem 13:45, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 21:59, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Straight after the last sockpuppet was blocked an IP pops up to make an edit along the same lines. FDW777 (talk) 17:21, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:02, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: An IP made massive POV changes to the article a while back and is now continuing with persistent POV changes that don't reflect what the sources say. He was blocked here and is IP hopping again. See this report and LTA. Griboski (talk) 17:44, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:03, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring going against both talk page consensus and MOS:ETHNICITY. Gbear605 (talk) 19:50, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:44, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unsourced content added by IPs. D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 20:14, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:42, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of socks of a WMF-legal banned user, WP:LTA/GRP. JavaHurricane 15:39, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Original request modified for the bot (Special:Diff/989905890) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:25, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Used by fully-protected Template:Template link expanded. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:51, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I commented here saying that the move should be completed so protection can be applied to the final result. However, if someone wants to protect this and unprotect it later, that's fine by me. Johnuniq (talk) 04:10, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator MusikBot. Primefac (talk) 12:03, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac: What are you talking about? My original request for protecting what is now Module:Template link general still stands. * Pppery * it has begun... 14:50, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I clearly used the wrong {{RFPP}} template, which I've now corrected. The page was already protected. Instead of blindly thinking I'm an idiot, maybe think about the fact that I made a mistake? For the record, I don't particularly think either template or module should be fprot (tprot is sufficient). Primefac (talk) 19:42, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected indefinitely. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:24, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Since 4 August 2020, an IP-hopper has been vandalizing the article with nonsensical unsourced negative claims and edit-warring when they are removed. Softlavender (talk) 20:57, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 21:07, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

LTA IP

Semi-protection: Long term abuse IP keeps circumventing blocks and vandalizing pages. He has been blocked multiple times on different addresses, but keeps coming back. He got blocked for 72 hours earlier today, but changed his IP and came back to vandalize the same set of articles again. Note that today is not the first occurrence of him vandalizing pages, so it is unlikely he will stop now. NoahTalk 00:15, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:44, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@ToBeFree: What about the user talk pages? I know Destroyeraa has been vandalized more than once by this IP. NoahTalk 14:51, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – User talk pages are not protected except in response to severe or continued vandalism. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:37, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP is vandalising the page. Ahmetlii (talk) 10:01, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:39, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – 대우건설,start at October. MCC214#ex umbra in solem 13:47, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:37, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Ahmetlii (talk) 15:08, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:34, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Prolix 💬 08:14, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Prolix: Sorry but we're supposed to guide newish editors and edit warring over which logo should be used is not vandalism. The talk page was last edited in April 2012! Please put a brief and polite explanation (without mentioning any editor) on talk and try to engage the user there. If they continue without discussion, ping me. Johnuniq (talk) 09:30, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That's fair Johnuniq, it's possible that the editor simply doesn't know what the rules are or doesn't understand the warnings in entirety. I'll make an attempt to discuss on the talk page. Thanks for pointing out my mistake! I'll let you know if the user doesn't engage in discussion. Prolix 💬 10:29, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection only for 2 weeks: Content disruption. Kent Bargo (talk) 08:26, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Kent Bargo: There are a couple of recent examples of vandalism in those pages, and that's not sufficient to warrant protection. Some of the articles haven't been edited recently. Johnuniq (talk) 09:34, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. NASCARfan0548  14:22, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:44, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Highly visible page – No reason to be moved. (It is already semi-move-protected, so bump it up to full-move protection.) JsfasdF252 (talk) 22:01, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. I don't see any history of improper moves or move warring, so I don't see any reason to increase the protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:23, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: It’s Today’s Featured Article and has already been vandalised a lot by trolls mainly because it’s a video game page (which tends to be a good target for trolls). I’d request it to be protected until tomorrow. Luigitehplumber (talk) 11:25, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:20, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --TheImaCow (talk) 11:48, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:58, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The user for whom the page is protected has managed to get 4 accounts autoconfirmed (at least since July). (CC) Tbhotch 15:51, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. The autoconfirmed sock attacks occur infrequently, and the socks seem to get blocked promptly. MelanieN (talk) 23:10, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: persistent vandalism. Previous protection expired and vandalism started again. Peter1170 (talk) 20:38, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. The existing, indefinite PC protection seems to be doing the job. MelanieN (talk) 00:04, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Edit warring and disruptive editing Prolix 💬 08:10, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:18, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism related to retaining/removal of the local, Islamic name of the town. Has spanned many months, and reverts to IP-originating vandalism have to be done almost daily. Purging Islamic names from formerly Hindu localities in the region is closely linked to the ongoing Kashmir conflict which is unlikely to resolve anytime soon, hence an indefinite protection request. — kashmīrī TALK 14:24, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely per WP:GS/IPAK. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:33, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 01:58, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @FilmandTVFan28: I blocked the IP which I think is all that is needed. Please keep an eye on Special:Contributions/86.17.26.17 and let me know if problems resume. Johnuniq (talk) 04:20, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of IP vandalism on a very high traffic article. (t · c) buidhe 07:05, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It had not been protected before; need to escalate. Johnuniq (talk) 08:12, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been vandalized for the past 2 weeks as the person in this article has been receiving more public attention. Dillon251992 (talk) 07:15, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:14, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Various ip addresses have been disruptive editing/vandalizing the article for several days non-stop. — YoungForever(talk) 02:43, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:21, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Player is in news regarding a potential new contract. Multiple premature edits are being made. Can the blocking admin also block user ThePongster please. He's made repeated similar edits despite multiple warnings. Rockchalk717 03:11, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. @Rockchalk717: Let me know if problems persist after the three days. However, please first put an explanation on the article talk page and request ThePongster (talk · contribs) to engage in discussion. See the warning I left on their talk. Johnuniq (talk) 04:29, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent near-daily vandalism lasting at least four weeks. This person or people keep coming back with different IP addresses. Requesting weeklong protection. MaxS 33 (talk) 05:23, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 05:49, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated ignorance of hidden notes advising against edits which are not supported by policy or consensus. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 20:49, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 03:42, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Silly IP hopping vandalisms today. Ifnord (talk) 21:54, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 03:43, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Recent WP:HOUNDING from a new editor. A few days of semi-protection will hopefully shake them off. --IJBall (contribstalk) 22:08, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blockedMelanieN (talk) 00:17, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Elizium23 (talk) 08:14, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Let's wait for the outcome of the report at WP:ANEWMelanieN (talk) 22:34, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Same thing on Kamp Koral: SpongeBob's Under Years. Magitroopa (talk) 20:16, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blockedMelanieN (talk) 23:58, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, article has been temporarily semi-protected twice before, and the problems have started back up immediately afterwards both times. Devonian Wombat (talk) 21:58, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 03:08, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: persistent IP vandalism. D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 19:52, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:44, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: edit warring between an IP and an extended-confirmed user. D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 20:06, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I have renewed the semi-protection and warned the extended-confirmed user, who has reached 3RR. MelanieN (talk) 23:55, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 20:36, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:01, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IPs edit warring over the actor's nationality (WP:INVOLVED request). Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:19, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:29, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. a gd fan (talk) 18:48, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:33, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism over the past two days by multiple IPs and a new registered account. BilCat (talk) 19:36, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:36, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruption still persistent despite PC, for at least whole week. Hummerrocket (talk) 15:28, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Replaced PC with semiprotection. Too much editing activity for PC to work effectively. MelanieN (talk) 23:04, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Nate Speed is back again. We'll never be at peace as long he lives. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 16:57, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitelyMelanieN (talk) 23:16, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Previous protection expired, the IP editors are back to making it Jordan North's "happy place". Schazjmd (talk) 17:17, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator MaterialscientistMelanieN (talk) 23:19, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long term sockpuppetry. a gd fan (talk) 17:31, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator EdJohnstonMelanieN (talk) 23:21, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. --Another Believer (Talk) 18:02, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:23, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

22 November 2020

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 14:55, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The user has been warned, we need to wait if they would revert again.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:35, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined--Ymblanter (talk) 15:23, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Election-related POV-pushing has resumed shortly after previous protection expired. GorillaWarfare (talk) 18:25, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:34, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: After the end of the last protection three days ago, persistent vandalism and edit war (again)--Luke Stark 96 (talk) 19:31, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 19:48, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IPs. HistoryofIran (talk) 17:21, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:01, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Just about every edit this month has been disruptive. Scorpions13256 (talk) 17:24, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:40, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

North Macedonia's WP:SPAs

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP and newly registered WP:SPA with intentional and systematic disruption to illustrate nationalist point. Jingiby (talk) 17:58, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:04, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism/Repeated content removal. Although 6 units have been moved to EMR the fleet Details are being changed to make them appear to be with their previous train operator. E.Wright1852 (talk) 13:11, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This is a content dispute, please discuss the matter on the talk page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:13, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: There has been a lot of vandalism in this article. I want you to keep this article safe for a long time. Dam222 🌋 (talk) 14:04, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Plenty of activity by established editors but I do not see much vandalism. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:05, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Pending changes protection isn't working, IP's keep on making the same disruptive edits which are bothersome to revert. Eyebeller (talk) 16:33, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:45, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism (unwanted advertisment of a product), may be all the IPs are used by one person. .💠245CMR💠.👥📜 06:14, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:46, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism (unwanted advertisment of a product), may be all the IPs are used by one person. .💠245CMR💠.👥📜 06:14, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:52, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism (unwanted advertisment of a product), may be all the IPs are used by one person. .💠245CMR💠.👥📜 06:14, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:52, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Praxidicae (talk) 19:08, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:48, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: indef always comes back to bite the protecting admin. can reassess in 1 year --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:48, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 12:04, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly Visible Template. Because while it isn't widely edited, any potential vandalism will throw it off. Please, let's get it over with. HurricaneTracker495 (talk) 20:20, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. The template has indefinite semi-protection and that seems to be doing the job. MelanieN (talk) 00:26, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 05:52, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:51, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. SpectresWrath (talk) 05:40, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:06, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 07:02, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:59, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Weird fancruft/vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 07:06, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:57, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – PC is not cutting it, still large amount of vandalism in this past week. Hummerrocket (talk) 03:01, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:38, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - Xexerss (talk) 04:14, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:39, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Sustained and reckless vandalism not connected to any events that have recently occurred or identifiable trends. Because of the drive-by anonymous SPA attacks using original research, ct docs, public info violating privacy, ineligible document research & evidence as ‘source’ it will probably continue. Without protection this acts of editing with defamation, edits with lies, and falsehoods will continue. Bezeq1 (talk) 04:26, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Bezeq1: Protection needs to escalate. Please put a brief explanation on article talk why the IP's edits are unsatisfactory and try to get attention from other editors, perhaps at a wikiproject. Johnuniq (talk) 09:42, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. MRZQ (talk) 08:34, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:45, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. MRZQ (talk) 08:36, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:42, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. JsfasdF252 (talk) 22:33, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Non-admin comment If you don't see any evidence that there are any distruptive editing or vandalism in the article by IPs or autoconfirmed users, even there are Arbitration enforcement on it, pages cannot be protected preemptively. 36.68.185.109 (talk) 22:52, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined @JsfasdF252: I would have to study the paperwork to know if the IP is correct (in general they are, but I'm not sure about the intersection with discretionary sanctions). However, it's two months since a revert occurred at that article, and there is nothing recent on talk. Please ask again if a problem arises. Johnuniq (talk) 04:26, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 01:13, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:37, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism that is not linked to any recent events or trends and is therefore likely to persist, and seemingly insufficient watch listing since reversions often take days to happen. Keepcalmandchill (talk) 01:34, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., too low intensity for semi-protection, the article has not been protected since 2008--Ymblanter (talk) 09:34, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism Jonasrivaldoakaronaldowati (talk) 02:52, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:36, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – On-going edit war. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:01, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:31, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continous disruptive edits from new editors or IP users blanking portions of the page and adding unsourced material. — CuriousGolden (T·C) 09:05, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. as arbitration enforcement--Ymblanter (talk) 09:27, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. (CC) Tbhotch 00:27, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I don't see any sources offered by the IP. Johnuniq (talk) 01:24, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – POV-pushing has resumed almost immediately after protection expired. This is a contentious article in the AP2 topic area which has been receiving a lot of outside attention due to conspiracy theories in the news. I placed the original protection, but would rather someone else do this one since I've edited the article a little bit since. GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:56, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 01:22, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

James Franklin (American football coach)

Temporary semi-protection: Ongoing vandalism post-loss re coach/team having difficult season. UW Dawgs (talk) 01:01, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Fuzheado. Semi-protected for one month. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:26, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Call for temporary page protection. High level of IP edit warring and the reversion of factual information despite repetitive warnings. Bettydaisies (talk) 01:03, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

IP blocked, reporter warned, page protected after block evasion.
Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:29, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 14:24, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:00, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Ahmetlii (talk) 17:15, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:00, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Hummerrocket (talk) 23:44, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hopefully sources will become available by the time this page is unprotected. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 23:59, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP Users as seen in the page history for the past months. KRtau16 (talk) 23:56, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:29, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

23 November 2020

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Lettlerhellocontribs 17:05, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:57, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Honeypot --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:57, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. For the bot. (CC) Tbhotch 18:46, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. See history. Paul Vaurie (talk) 19:11, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent blanking of sections. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 19:46, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same IP LTA attacking User talk:Destroyeraa. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 16:28, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 18:34, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Microwave Anarchist (talk) 18:09, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:37, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 18:18, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:38, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism due to current political events. 205.175.118.223 (talk) 18:34, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:41, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Praxidicae (talk) 15:24, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:51, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Indef is excessive at this juncture, and I don't want someone five years from now complaining about my stupidity for indef protecting. We can apply a longer protection if it becomes warranted. The last SP was in 2016. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:51, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 18:06, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from an IP range regarding an unknown/unsourced 2021 ceremony occuring. Magitroopa (talk) 14:40, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. TheSandDoctor Talk 14:45, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IP addresses are removing content and references from the page. I have left warnings on their talk pages. They may not understand English as their edit summaries are not in English.Telenovelafan215 (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:02, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 17:01, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:02, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. CruzRamiss2002 (talk) 07:23, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. TheSandDoctor Talk 14:29, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection, 1-2 weeks: Persistent disruptive editing. Previous 48h protection did not deter editor. DylanI00 (talk) 09:40, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. TheSandDoctor Talk 14:32, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism occurring every couple of hours from different IP users. I simply can't keep up. Maxipups Mamsipupsovich (talk) 10:15, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. TheSandDoctor Talk 14:34, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruption. HistoryofIran (talk) 11:44, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. TheSandDoctor Talk 14:36, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Pending changes currently being swamped due to a recent funeral in Pakistan, so possibly change to semi-protection for a while? FDW777 (talk) 12:50, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. TheSandDoctor Talk 14:39, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:25, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. TheSandDoctor Talk 14:42, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request extended semi-protection for repeated addition of factually incorrect information at a BLP. User:Namiba 14:37, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. TheSandDoctor Talk 14:44, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. --TheImaCow (talk) 19:06, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. MelanieN (talk) 02:58, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Johnuniq (talk) 06:55, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

unprotection: The last dispute was six years ago. Unprotected articles like Michel Aoun, Samir Geagea, Walid Jumblatt and Bachir Gemayel may be more controversial than this one. I don't see any reason any protection, especially "Extended-confirmed" protection. Ahmed NGS (talk) 15:28, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The protection invoked WP:A/I/PIA: All IP editors, users with fewer than 500 edits, and users with less than 30 days' tenure are prohibited from editing content within the area of conflict, but I'm notifying the protecting admin, Callanecc. Favonian (talk) 17:57, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The protection is doing new editors a favor because they are not permitted to edit such articles regardless of whether or not they are protected. Certain conditions have to be met for that to be true, but the article being protected since November 2017 shows that the conditions are very likely satisfied. Johnuniq (talk) 06:50, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined per the Arbitration Committee decision referenced above. I've also protected Michel Aoun given the recent disruptive edits. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:47, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Immediate resume of disruptive editing stemming from previous multi-month protection. livelikemusic (TALK!) 00:53, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 24.139.147.39 (talk · contribs) blocked by TheSandDoctor. TheSandDoctor Talk 03:46, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 06:01, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:54, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Req: 2 week semi. Indian gossip rags, and also some mainstream sources, have idiotically reported that this article subject has received recognition by Google as the "national crush of India". Maybe I'm in the minority, but I'm not aware of Google issuing recognitions in the scope of defining who the National ___ is.

On the article's talk page, I have pointed out that this is a total misinterpretation by some jackass journalist(s) who Googled "National Crush of India 2020" and interpreted the top-recommended post as an endorsement by Google, when the source of the glowing praise comes from charmboard.com, a user-generated source. This is classic shoddy Indian journalism making a claim that is demonstrably false, and that SPAs and fans seem to be latching onto.[55][56][57] And this is just disruptive. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:30, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Cyphoidbomb: Notify me if it persists after one week. Johnuniq (talk) 06:53, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection. After the end of temporary semi-protection in response to persistent vandalism, the same issue has cropped up again. An IP user keeps inserting the word 'racist' to describe the subject, without qualification or citation and in obvious violation of BLP. Thanks! JeanLackE (talk) 20:31, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 03:10, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Unsourced content. Elizium23 (talk) 21:42, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I see a slow-motion edit war, or partial edit war, between you and the other user, but no attempt to engage at the talk page. They are a long-time editor and so are you, so you know what to do: When you revert one of their edits, go to the article talk page, ping them, and explain why.  MelanieN (talk) 03:18, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP keeps reverting political party to the wrong alignment, even when others had already proofed it with sources. AINH (talk) 22:45, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 03:39, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Tangerang Banten based vandalism resumed after last protection expired. Jalen Folf (talk) 01:30, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@JalenFolf: There's nothing on talk to explain the situation and someone unfamiliar with the topic would have no idea what the problem is. Your edit summary of "Last stable revision..." doesn't explain how I can tell that the Wikipedia's definition of vandalism (WP:VAND) is satisfied. Johnuniq (talk) 04:15, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The problem here is that an IP hopper from the location described above keeps reverting to their preferred version of the article despite constant updates related to this recurring event, which includes false information about previous tournaments. Can easily be defined as disruptive, and in some cases, edit warring. Jalen Folf (talk) 19:29, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@JalenFolf: I see your edit summary and I see the IP's edit, but I literally have no idea why the IP's edit is vandalism. Please outline the problem, preferably on article talk for easy reference in the future (without painful detail, and best to not mention specific editors because WP:DENY is best). How can I tell that the IP's edit is disruptive? Or, at least can you get a couple of people from a wikiproject to agree that the IP's edit is bad. Johnuniq (talk) 23:05, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@JalenFolf: This will have to be archived soon. How can an admin with no knowledge of the topic tell that the IP's edit is disruptive? Please give two diffs with an explanation of how it is known they are bad. That should be on article talk. Any admin who feels the article should be protected or this should be declined, please do so. Johnuniq (talk) 02:51, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This reply is not just to Johnuniq, but also to any reviewing admin looking at this. The anonymous editor, all IPs of which originate out of Tangerang, Indonesia, began vandalizing with changes to flags here, in 2 edits. All of this users' edits, based in the same location, either have the same content as or are a derivative of the falsified information in this edit. One more attempt by the vandal to restore their version of the article was made in April before their edit warring behavior and subsequent page protections began in September. I have notified WP:FOOTY of this behavior twice already; one is already archived at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Archive 135#U-17 World Cup article vandalism, and I just notified the same WikiProject of this behavior at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#False info on FIFA U-17 World Cup. Per request by Johnuniq, I will also copy this message to the Talk page of the article, linking back to this request as reference. Jalen Folf (talk) 03:09, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yeah, the false info refers to podium places in the 2019 edition as well as nationalities of players. Refer to the 2019 Podium vandalism section on the article Talk page. Jalen Folf (talk) 03:32, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:26, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection– User request. Fears of vandals harassing me here. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 16:19, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Should be declined-no vandalism on userpage. --HurricaneTracker495 (talk) 18:05, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@HurricaneTracker495: thanks, fixed request reason. I just don’t want anyone editing my user page unless they are trusted (ext confirmed and above). ~ Destroyeraa🌀 18:12, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Destroyeraa: trusted autoconfirmed users like me shpuld be able to edit your userpage if there's a typo-still should be declined. --HurricaneTracker495 (talk) 18:15, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@HurricaneTracker495: You can tell me on my talk page then if that’s the case. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 18:21, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
IMO, there is no reason of that. Base user pages are semiprotected by an edit filter, non extended confirmed users shouldn't have to make an edit request to fix something(which is more effective as then any EC user can fix)and pages aren't protected without reason. --HurricaneTracker495 (talk) 18:23, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. As HurricaneTracker said, user pages are already semi-protected and that seems to be adequate. MelanieN (talk) 02:52, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Page should not need protection and would not be preemptively protected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:53, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Ongoing vandalism due to the cycle of the college football season. UW Dawgs (talk) 04:02, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. TheSandDoctor Talk 05:46, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – We've seen a return of the IP vandal putting in era-inappropriate company names that got this page protected Oct 22. Nat Gertler (talk) 05:33, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. TheSandDoctor Talk 05:52, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting create protection on this draft title and main article title for a non-existent children's film based on a non-existent book. A Dutch IP editor, likely a child, has been obsessively creating it and variants for the past year using account Guy1998 (banned) IPs 84.24.122.95 (now banned for a year), 2001:1C03:6023:3E00:BC6C:5D22:1752:C723, etc. including "Draft:Guy In De Jellyland The Series (2020)", "Draft:Guy In The Jellyland (Franchise)", etc. As film is entirely imaginary, no possibility of interfering with genuine articles. Blythwood (talk) 21:44, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Applies to both the article title and the draft. MelanieN (talk) 03:22, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A section of the article titled "Santa Clara study" was boldly added, removed on WP:MEDRS and WP:BLP grounds, and is being discussed currently at the article talk page. Unfortunately, in the meantime, several IP and newly-registered accounts have been repeatedly re-adding the section to the article. Temp ECP requested. Thanks in advance. Lev¡vich 22:01, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Non-administrator comment Levivich, This is more likely a content dispute, so i needs a dispute resolution in the talk page. 36.68.185.109 (talk) 22:06, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, the content dispute is being resolved on the article talk page; discussion is already underway; no consensus has been reached yet. The conduct problem is that multiple editors are edit warring to keep the disputed content in the article, while the discussion is ongoing at the talk page. It's this conduct problem that page protection will fix. Lev¡vich 22:10, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:30, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing following previous protection. livelikemusic (TALK!) 00:55, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. TheSandDoctor Talk 03:44, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Jalen Folf (talk) 19:17, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Applies to the redirect (which was the requested article here). MelanieN (talk) 03:03, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Applies to the target page. MelanieN (talk) 03:03, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing and Vandalism by sockpuppets and IP vandals. Best, MTATransitFanChat! 19:25, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:05, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations. Binksternet (talk) 22:08, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Binksternet: I used semi as a quick look could not justify ECP. Ping me if evidence (after now) shows ECP is needed. The discussion on article talk should state more clearly what the DoB is, according to consensus and sources, and why the tweet is not to be used. Johnuniq (talk) 03:00, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi protection Vandal harassing me. FOUR TIMES ALREADY. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 15:29, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) I support page protection, but only for like 72 hours max. On an IP, I opened an ANI thread of a vandal of a sock Blue Barnett Ban who harassed me and others and vandalized on IPs and said “loser”. You can find it at WP: ANI Archive 1049. Eventually, they will go away. HurricaneTracker495 (talk) 16:04, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:50, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --TheImaCow (talk) 17:42, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:55, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 02:54, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Let's get these 2 editors to the talk page....both being warned. Moxy 🍁 01:46, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Will you 2 stop? next go around is blocks?--Moxy 🍁 02:07, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You appear to have missed that @Île flottante: also reverted Cerruti1881 sh... Heck you did too, what do you mean will you 2 stop? Horse Eye's Back (talk) 02:04, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:16, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

24 November 2020

Indefinite extended protection: I am planning to use this to substitute my signature, so it would be really bad is someone vandalized this. Best regards, 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 03:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Non-admin comment: 4thfile4thrank, When you create this page, I don't believe there are persistent vandalism from any IP users for now. As you know, if it doesn't see any vandalism or distruptive editing happened in a user page, articles, or talk pages, pages cannot be protected preemptively. Let see if there are vandalism from IP users after you create the page. 36.68.185.109 (talk) 03:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@36.68.185.109: There is none, but user pages can be protected at request, and there is no reason for anyone to edit my signature, as it is a signature. Best regards, 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 04:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)\[reply]
Not done User pages and subpages within their own user space may be protected upon a request from the user, as long as a need exists. GorillaWarfare (talk) 17:36, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP spam. Csgir (talk) 08:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. GorillaWarfare (talk) 17:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruption. HistoryofIran (talk) 15:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. GorillaWarfare (talk) 17:55, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: it probably doesn't matter, but it looks like something odd has happened to this entry as it now mixes references to two different places. Thanks for sorting it, though. DBaK (talk) 20:54, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You're right, DBaK. First a rookie editor did this (notice the missing "==="), and then the bot really screwed the pooch. Ah well, water under the bridge. Favonian (talk) 21:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
And now this. Things are getting personal. Favonian (talk) 22:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Favonian. Probably time for a nice cup of tea. As you say, WUTB. Best wishes DBaK (talk) 22:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 22:24, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 21:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Favonian (talk) 21:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Extended confirmed, in case of socking. 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 01:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. So far the page has only ever been created by that user, who is now blocked. If sockpuppets recreating the page becomes an issue, we can consider protection then. GorillaWarfare (talk) 17:13, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. HurricaneTracker495 (talk) 01:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GorillaWarfare (talk) 17:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. 36.68.185.109 (talk) 02:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GorillaWarfare (talk) 17:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ----Rdp060707 (Your questions?/My fight against the devil) 03:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Valid request at the time, but appears to be stale at this point. GorillaWarfare (talk) 17:22, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request for full indefinite page protection at last consensual, non diffamatory version (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Juan_Branco&diff=990478125&oldid=990477142) until the following conflict is solved and a new consensual version is not elaborated: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Juan_Branco

2A01:CB04:B16:B300:35FB:2FAC:387D:ED62 (talk) 18:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Juan Branco (formerly User:brancojuan)[reply]

While the page needs protection please note the violations of WP:NLT by the IP. MarnetteD|Talk 18:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. User:Namiba 19:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User:MariaJaydHicky. (CC) Tbhotch 19:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:22, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EMachine03 (talk) 20:07, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Recent disruptive IP user blocked. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:24, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection: Recently been in an AfD that ended with no consensus. An editor moved this page to another title just on his own. Another editor requested reversion at the RMT. Though I've reverted the undiscussed move. This article should be move protected, and move should be only done by a page mover/admin after a valid RM discussion. Thank you. ─ The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 20:16, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done At this point this appears to have been a one-off move and revert, not an ongoing issue. GorillaWarfare (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Constant reversions by a single-purpose user, SeonaMillar, for over 5 months. They continue to make edits to the lead paragraph without engaging in the ongoing Talk discussion on the topic, and content isn't written from a NPOV. Should be noted that the constructive edits of the single-purpose user have been accepted and added to the relevant section on the page, but they keep duplicating the content into the lead paragraph. Extended discussion on Talk page. ScepticalChymist (talk) 12:42, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. GorillaWarfare (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA4#ARBPIA_General_Sanctions. nableezy - 02:04, 24 November 2020 (UTC) 02:04, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 07:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – edit warring. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 16:37, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:12, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Nominations where just announced so there is an influx of disruptive editing RealFakeKimT 18:23, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Update: persistent vandalism by IPs. D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 18:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Significant disruption on this page. Recommend 6 months to a year page protection. Interstellarity (talk) 19:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Favonian (talk) 20:04, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

25 November 2020

Semi-protection: IP editors and new users "fixing" Indonesian spelling and removing the word "myth". - Sumanuil (talk) 22:12, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Low"? Other than reverts, it hasn't had a major legit edit since September. - Sumanuil (talk) 23:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:06, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: subject has died. page is going crazy. need some protection. Idan (talk) 16:26, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Nosebagbear. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:57, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Partially blocked IPs from Canada and another one from Oman vandalizing the article, removing the infobox image without any explanation. [58] [59] [60]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:14, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Deepfriedokra. Favonian (talk) 20:27, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP and unconfirmed editor vandalism. Lard Almighty (talk) 08:04, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Bongwarrior. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:49, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. RolandR (talk) 13:26, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sam Walton (talk) 13:27, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Another spate of Scott The Woz vandalism. O.N.R. (talk) 15:58, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:21, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 23:12, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I concur that the disruption doesn't rise to a level where an article talk-page might need protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:06, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. WhiteFalcon1 (talk) 08:22, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:08, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Resumption of disruptive editing and vandalism shortly after last lock expired. Grayfell (talk) 08:46, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:07, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – A large part of this book focuses on WWII in Poland which requires ECP. (t · c) buidhe 23:16, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note buidhe, This page cannot be ECP even due to arbitration enforcement of it, because the distruptive editing only happens at one IP range (96.65.1.xx) and one user which is not yet autoconfirmed. IMO, the page would be likely indef semi-protection instead as preemptive action to prevent further distruptive behavior. 36.68.185.109 (talk) 05:13, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Not done I'm not seeing the kind of ongoing disruption that would warrant indefinite protection, and the immediate issue appears to have been resolved by a block. GorillaWarfare (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:07, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. a gd fan (talk) 04:24, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 19:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Sockpuppetry. Best regards, 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 23:11, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. TheSandDoctor Talk 04:30, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism by unregistered users constantly reverting edits by senior users, request of either temporary semi-protection or for the article to only allow edits from registered users. RM-Taylor (talk) 21:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. TheSandDoctor Talk 04:30, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 00:51, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. TheSandDoctor Talk 04:28, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 01:05, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:01, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Ongoing edit warring between two users. -The one, the only, Editor760 (talk) 20:37, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection - Persistent vandalism by sock-master. GoodDay (talk) 22:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Nick Moyes. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:57, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: The subject of this article (Annie Lederman) recently posted a screenshot of a joke edit on this page to her Instagram account (@annielederman) with a caption encouraging similar vandalism. At least one IP user has since made a similar joke edit. It would probably be a good idea to semi-protect this page until things blow over. warmly, ezlev. talk 02:42, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:58, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and sockpuppetry. pengu 19:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)pengu[reply]

Declined There have been two disruptive users, both now blocked, in November. Besides that the article hasn't been touched since July. If it continues to be a sockpuppetry target, I have no qualms about it being protected, but I'm not seeing the need at this current moment. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs making same vandalism edit repeatedly, possible socks?. LizardJr8 (talk) 22:36, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. LTA. Favonian (talk) 22:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DannyS712 (talk) 22:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator L235. Favonian (talk) 22:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

26 November 2020

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Crossroads -talk- 16:08, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:40, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Hello. The couple of lines (about facts, not opinions) added are being widely covered with detail by most of the major international news portals about space, physics, and astronomy (at least 6 reliable secondary sources are included - DailyMaily is excluded according to Wikipedia consensus (although it's the UK news portal with more circulation by far).

https://astronomy.com/news/2020/11/sun-like-star-identified-as-the-potential-source-of-the-wow-signal?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+astronomy%2ForOJ+%28Astronomy.com+News+-+Presented+by+Astronomy+Magazine%29 https://www.exoplanety.cz/2020/11/23/amatersky-astronom-nasel-hvezdu-od-ktere-mohl-prijit-wow-signal/ https://phys.org/news/2020-11-amateur-astronomer-alberto-caballero-source.html https://www.coasttocoastam.com/article/origin-of-wow-signal-found/ https://futurism.com/the-byte/strongest-candidate-alien-message-came-from-sun-like-star https://interestingengineering.com/amateur-astronomer-finds-possible-source-of-wow-signal-after-43-years https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-8985997/Amateur-astronomer-traces-possible-source-notorious-WOW-signal.html https://cosmoknowledge.com/identifiying-possible-sources-of-the-wow-signal/ https://hackaday.com/2020/11/25/the-wow-signal-and-the-search-for-extraterrestrial-intelligence/

A couple of editors refuse to include this content (couple of lines) on the grounds that everything in Wikipedia must be peer-reviewed by a journal. Consensus about adding those couple of lines was reached in the TalkPage if enough secondary sources were found, without the need of peer-reviewed. Moreover, there are much content just in this WOW! Signal article that even has no citation or comes from a source not peer-reviewed, including youtube videos. For all these reasons I request this article to be temporarily protected. Thank you. ExoEditor (talk) 17:07, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Favonian (talk) 17:17, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Consensus about adding those couple of lines was reached in the TalkPage if enough secondary sources were found, without the need of peer-reviewed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ExoEditor (talkcontribs) 17:23, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Incorrect, there was no "consensus" by other editors - only the blanking of their comments. David J Johnson (talk) 18:28, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: OP blocked (by me) for violating 3RR. Favonian (talk) 17:25, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 21:07, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Nate Speed is back once again. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 21:23, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- zzuuzz (talk) 21:32, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Nate Speed again. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 21:23, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- zzuuzz (talk) 21:31, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism/edit warring. Eldhose Talk 07:23, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 12:04, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Sockpuppetry from Si Thu Moe Min and Mone Sein Lr - as well as other users. I have attempted to get this article protected before, and this time this should be done for serious. It could be either semi-protection or ECP, though I'm strongly preferring ECP due to history of this article as well as the this is about a conflict. SMB99thx my edits! 11:27, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. We usually do not protect articles indefinitely if they have never been protected before.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:50, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Si Thu Moe Min (and edit warring). Since this page rarely got targeted by socks, I think a week's protection should suffice. SMB99thx my edits! 11:53, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Please report again if disruption continues. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:12, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Eldhose Talk 07:06, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Airplaneman (talk) 08:05, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – edit war over Mötley Crüe's music genre. MetalDiablo666 (talk) 22:33, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Since the removal of temporary protection, page has been changed another 10 times. Discussion with anonymous IPs seems pointless as they are from 10 different (though very similar!) IPs. Have tried to discuss on talk page. Discussion was immediately deleted by same IP. Doctorhawkes (talk) 08:48, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:37, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:37, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. 4 weeks will be a good time to calm the vandals. - The9Man (Talk) 11:11, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:31, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring. Ahmetlii (talk) 05:28, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Airplaneman (talk) 07:59, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Paul Vaurie (talk) 23:54, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:55, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent POVPUSH by IPs, has been going on continuously since the last year. A mid-term semi is needed. Gotitbro (talk) 23:54, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection., I only see two possibly bad edits since April.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:00, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection or pending changes: Article just came off semi-protection today, and the same pattern of vandalism that got the article semi-protected twice before immediately started up again. This article is going to need some kind of longer-term protection, because the vandal(s) hitting this article don't look to be going away. --IJBall (contribstalk) 06:28, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 08:02, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Ahmetlii (talk) 06:50, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 08:03, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism/edit warring. AussieWikiDan (talk) 07:09, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 08:08, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:22, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 08:12, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This article has been victim to sockpuppetry and IP vandalism for years. Everytime it gets protected, the IPs return to just vandalise it again, typically by adding in false information to the programming list. It appears to me that the only option is an indefinite protection. If not, at least six months. Foxnpichu (talk) 22:54, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:10, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of poorly sourced information. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 23:01, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:03, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Israel relationship with other countries

Indefinite Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. 36.68.185.109 (talk) 23:01, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection - Persistent vandalism/edit-warring by IP editors who are either using non-neutral language in the controversy section or are deleting it seemingly for political purposes.Waqeem (talk) 23:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Wug·a·po·des 04:48, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection - short term. Someone using an IP and two user accounts (one of them blocked) made several strange vandalism edits to the article in the last 12 hours. --mfb (talk) 00:09, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Viralkvm (talk · contribs). Wug·a·po·des 04:53, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by a hurted and defeated Canadian. Flix11 (talk) 02:05, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Seems that things have subsided. Wug·a·po·des 04:55, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. a gd fan (talk) 03:42, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Seems to have subsided. Wug·a·po·des 04:56, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unregistered user keep vandalising the article, if there's any admin around please help to ban this user Ano666nymous. Even after told off by LizardJr8 in the user talk page, Ano666nymous continue to disobey and continue to vandalism the page. Paper9oll | Talk:(Paper9oll) 04:13, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Ano666nymous (talk · contribs) blocked by Widr. Wug·a·po·des 04:57, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Protection: A bunch of IP addresses repeatedly wrote vague (or deceptive) edit summaries for their edits that weren't constructive in the first place. Furthermore, almost no one noticed that one of IP editors deliberately removed hatnotes one month ago. I recently reinserted it. Well, the last IP edit was early this month last week, but frequent reverts concern me. George Ho (talk) 04:15, 25 November 2020 (UTC); standing corrected, 04:42, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.} An edit war from a week ago that's stopped isn't enough to justify protection. If it starts up again, make another report. Wug·a·po·des 05:00, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. NASCARfan0548  06:14, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 07:58, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content and disruptive editing mostly by IPs and new accounts. Started as soon as the previous one expired, asking for an indef since this is not going to go away anytime soon. Gotitbro (talk) 12:24, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 07:50, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism about the stadium name. Paul Vaurie (talk) 00:00, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:58, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing and edit warring between editors at cross-odds in an active violent conflict. This conflict has seen a surge of new accounts created on social media to litigate disputes virtually, and Wikipedia is no different, as evinced by editing patterns. --Varavour (talk) 00:34, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Non-admin comment: Varavour, Distruptive editing, vandalism, and edit warring i believe was held mostly by IP and new account that has not yet autoconfirmed, particularly IPv6 range when they remove or adding unsourced content. I see it in that edit history. 36.68.190.244 (talk) 01:13, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Right, I don't see a need for extended confirmed protection, but a short-term semi-protection may help here. Airplaneman (talk) 07:56, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Persistent IP and sock account vandalism listing characters without proper citation. Hellboy42 (talk) 01:08, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator L235. Airplaneman (talk) 07:51, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Another vandal attacking me. Raising the paranoia. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 02:10, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Non-admin comment: A user that vandalise your talk page (Full of Hong Kong Flags) was blocked. So it is no need for requesting the protection. 36.68.190.244 (talk) 02:20, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
My talk page has been the target of several vandals. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 02:21, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 07:47, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. User:Namiba 17:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 07:37, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Previously protected, it is being hit by an IP-hopping vandal today. Ifnord (talk) 23:49, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 07:34, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. S0091 (talk) 00:11, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Airplaneman (talk) 07:33, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: (or appropriate level of admin's choice) Repeated IP vandalism. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:18, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 07:32, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: persistent addition of unsourced and poorly sourced content as well as sockpuppetry. Call me when you get the chance 02:30, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 07:46, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - Xexerss (talk) 04:26, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 07:46, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors warring over a disputed historical massacre. Can an admin please put a stop to it? Thanks,. (t · c) buidhe 04:40, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 07:45, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent adding of election results when they have not been called and vandalism by IP editors. Sdrqaz (talk) 13:42, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done (very borderline) KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 06:39, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive additions/poor source understanding by IPs and new accounts. Likely to continue as seen by the article's history, article is covered by WP:ARBIPA sanctions, asking for a mid-term semi here. Gotitbro (talk) 15:32, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 06:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism to a BLP from four IPs in the last week. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 19:49, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 07:26, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. WhiteFalcon1 (talk) 04:30, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 07:27, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Folks - IPs are consistently reverting the date of birth without sourcing the same. I am not able to protect anymore since I have to go to sleep shortly. Please provide temporary protection.

The current date of birth is from this location: Assam Assembly. Ktin (talk) 04:34, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Folks, I just woke up and see that the vandals have been at it again! What would it take to provide some form of temporary protection? I am unable to continuously monitor this page. Ktin (talk) 18:40, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Wug·a·po·des 05:03, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Wug·a·po·des 05:03, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 05:21, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This appears to be a long term problem. Wug·a·po·des 05:05, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed protection Repeated additions of copyvio by multiple users. PohranicniStraze (talk) 05:22, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Non-admin comment Adding or deleting a copyvio by multiple users is actually a content dispute. So it needs to undergo dispute resolution on talk page. 110.137.165.46 (talk) 05:28, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Wug·a·po·des 05:09, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Paul Vaurie (talk) 23:55, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hopefully once the initial attention around the death of the Diego Maradona has ceased the vandalism / disruptive editing will cease. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 00:10, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Multiple IPs removing CSD tag. —teb728 t c 04:51, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Page has now been speedy deleted. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:56, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. – DarkGlow () 21:21, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent BLP vandalism from multiple IPs in the last couple days. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 21:46, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:56, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

27 November 2020

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing since November 24. Cassiopeia(talk) 08:21, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ‑Scottywong| [converse] || 18:54, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent, on-going vandalism by anonymous editors. livelikemusic (TALK!) 14:21, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ‑Scottywong| [soliloquize] || 18:55, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – 1-day protection so that the discussion under Talk:Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation#Criticism can flourish, while preventing an edit war. Alternatively, 1-day pending changes protection. Opalzukor (talk) 19:45, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits to the article in about 24 hours. Full protection seems like overkill. Let's see if talk page discussions can take place without protection. ‑Scottywong| [confess] || 19:13, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – On-going edit war. Stuartyeates (talk) 21:28, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. ‑Scottywong| [verbalize] || 18:52, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Being targeted by Cutler LTA, see recent edit history as well as edit filter log for his most recent IP address. Ravensfire (talk) 16:19, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:45, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: No reason to keep this page move-protected. It was apparently originally protected because Willy on Wheels hit it twice (and Grawp once). O.N.R. (talk) 17:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:49, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 15:33, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:53, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruption. The amount of times this article has been disrupted throughout it history is actually mind-boggling. HistoryofIran (talk) 15:51, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:55, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from IP/new users and has been protected 10+ times since January 2013 so I am requesting indef semi-protection. –Cupper52Talk to me! 19:08, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:58, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – spate of politically motivated IP editing. Acousmana (talk) 21:01, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – indef. EdJohnston (talk) 21:07, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppeting goes back at least a year. S0091 (talk) 19:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi S0091, if you are requesting this because of me. No reason to worry, I'm no sockpuppet. I think I may have edited out sources by mistake so you were totally correct in reverting my edit. I'm sorry for the confusion! I'll be more careful from now on.Historian734 (talk) 20:17, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Historian734: like I stated in my request, the issues go back at least a year and the article's history is a mess. I hope having the page protected with quell the disruption so if there are issues with content and sourcing, it can be worked out. S0091 (talk) 20:34, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Aha, ok cool. Historian734 (talk) 22:25, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [speak] || 19:09, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Resumed after last protection expired. Jalen Folf (talk) 19:29, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:38, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP user keeps changing page statistics — mostly dates, without any explanation or mention of source. Same user (geolocated) often undoes his/her own changes. Not sure if this is experimentation or deliberate vandalism — either way it is disruptive. JlACEer (talk) 19:40, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:37, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Best regards, 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 21:06, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Extended protection not needed, as the users who are disruptive don't appear to be autoconfirmed. ‑Scottywong| [gab] || 18:51, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs and users changing the WP:COMMONNAME of the article [61], [62] [63] [64]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:45, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Violation of WP:COMMONNAME continues [65], now another IP. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:12, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [speak] || 18:58, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. EN-Jungwon (talk) 15:11, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Restored the indefinite semi-protection that was removed when the recent temporary full protection expired. Pending changes protection probably wouldn't work well on this page, because the edit rate is relatively high. ‑Scottywong| [confess] || 19:02, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs adding unsourced information. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 16:19, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pending changes protection is not appropriate for articles with a high edit rate. ‑Scottywong| [speak] || 19:05, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – One[66] too many jojokes on the article. Opalzukor (talk) 18:13, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [converse] || 19:06, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Paul Vaurie (talk) 15:01, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [express] || 18:41, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive political editing by rotating northern Taiwan-based IPs: 1 (they were blocked); 2 and 3 are merely block evasion

Similar episode occurred last time page was protected. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 15:46, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [babble] || 18:43, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism which involves dozens of grammar and style errors. BattleshipMan (talk) 16:28, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [prattle] || 18:45, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Long term persistent addition of WP:PROMO/non-notable sites. While we are generally doing a good job of catching it, thinking Pending Changes may be helpful. S0091 (talk) 20:31, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [squeal] || 18:47, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Was protected a year ago, and was immediately vandalized once the protection expired. דוד (talk) 14:02, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined For now. The disruptive edits were made by a single user and have not returned in the ensuing days. If the problem returns, please feel free to request again. Kosack (talk) 15:14, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from several IP users. Donner60 (talk) 23:14, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism has stopped as of this edit, 30 minutes later. I will report again if it restarts. Donner60 (talk) 23:45, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor Lectonar (talk) 12:25, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 09:02, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 15:10, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. For over a year, anons have made repeated BLP violations. Nothing good has ever comefrom anons editing it in at least ten months. HurricaneTracker495 (talk) 02:18, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Hasn't been edited in more than a week, with only two disruptive edits this month and even less before that. Kosack (talk) 10:18, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Tayi Arajakate Talk 09:37, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:56, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. MRZQ (talk) 13:03, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator NinjaRobotPirate. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:58, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive and unsourced changes by some IP hopper. Wario-Man (talk) 12:27, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The disruption was a little light to begin with and it's coming up on 48 hours without another edit. Please feel free to renominate if it starts up again. Kosack (talk) 07:29, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection - Persistent vandalism by User:ImTheIP, using non-neutral language. Just discovered today (11.25.20) although vandalism occurred since September 2020. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Worlduse (talkcontribs) 19:19, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Kosack (talk) 07:50, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 16:46, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Kosack (talk) 08:04, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Most recent edits have been by IP editors adding false information or vandalism. –WPA (talk) 18:06, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 07:48, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of unsourced content added by IPs to a BLP. D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 12:20, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 08:30, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Previously protected for the same reason. Persistent changing of the subject's pronouns to be feminine across multiple IPs, despite no indication of the subject identifying as a woman outside of their Twitter bio. (It seems the bio is possibly intended as satire.). Perryprog (talk) 17:53, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 08:27, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 18:51, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 08:32, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Generally sensitive topic. Opalzukor (talk) 19:08, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Article has never required protection before, so skipping straight to indefinite protection is unwarranted. Kosack (talk) 08:35, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Leschnei (talk) 01:37, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 08:43, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Jetstreamer Talk 11:31, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 07:28, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism - addition of nonsense material 130.216.44.234 (talk) 23:12, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 07:25, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:08, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 07:41, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. One editor with a variety of similar IPs, one IP blocked yesterday but just carrying on with more IPs. FDW777 (talk) 07:56, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 209.232.147.0/24 (talk · contribs). Wug·a·po·des 00:21, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated removal of information by IP Users.   Aloha27  talk  13:55, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism even with pending changes. Pahunkat (talk) 21:25, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ponyo. Favonian (talk) 22:10, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

28 November 2020

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive IP that keeps trying to add fringe material implying sexual abuse causes homosexuality. Crossroads -talk- 18:08, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:18, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Palmer Report has enlisted its twitter followers to "correct" the article on its behalf: https://twitter.com/PalmerReport/status/1332747381683736576 Rabbitflyer and Dylsss are trying to keep up with the massive removals of sourced content. Schazjmd (talk) 18:13, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Schazjmd, Ahh, looks like this article is going to receive some more disruptive editing. It was previously protected as AE, the 30-500 might need to be restored. Dylsss(talk contribs) 18:21, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 18:35, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Vandals harassing me. Impersonators returning. Thinking Oshwah is holy. Needs to stop. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 19:15, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – One month. Try this for a while and see what happens. With full protection you could not edit your own talk page. If it turns out that, from now on, you still get talk page vandalism from registered accounts report them at WP:AIV and an admin will take care of them. EdJohnston (talk) 19:22, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Protection conflict; restored to EdJohnston's time frame. Airplaneman (talk) 19:24, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 23:07, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The vandalism was occured by same person as who is vandalize Rocky Mountain PBS, and now both of them (IP and registered user) was blocked. 118.96.191.51 (talk) 13:51, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Airplaneman (talk) 14:13, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Subject is in the headlines and is attracting a lot of disruptive attention. A semi for a week or two to tamp down on vandalism and unconstructive editing would be appreciated. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 23:25, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The edit rate is high, but the unconstructive editing seems to be in the minority. On the balance, I don't think the level of disruption outweighs constructive contributions from IPs. I'm happy to be convinced otherwise, and other admins can protect if they see fit. Airplaneman (talk) 14:23, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by several editors in the past 24 hours invoking the character's controversies in China, which is already properly covered in a section in the article. –WPA (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Airplaneman (talk) 14:35, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 23:12, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Non-admin comment: 70.16.233.79 and Quest1998 are evidently same user, so i report that users to AIV. 118.96.191.51 (talk) 23:22, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Airplaneman (talk) 13:33, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: I did a page swap per WP:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 November 9#Template:User Good Articles but was unable to leave protection in place. Original protection log entry said: 19:17, 10 January 2018 Primefac talk contribs protected Template:User Good Articles [Edit=Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access] (indefinite) [Move=Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access] (indefinite) (semi-protecting highly-visible templates in response to recent template-space vandalism). — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 07:48, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Maile (talk) 16:31, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated attempts. Eldhose Talk 10:25, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Airplaneman (talk) 13:57, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Prolix 💬 10:54, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Airplaneman (talk) 13:54, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs denying that the genocide happened. (t · c) buidhe 09:52, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:25, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I can't really protect indefinitely, though I have little doubt I'll be back a year from now. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:25, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:26, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection Vandalism from multiple IPs. –Cupper52Talk to me! 12:26, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:58, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent re-adding of non-cited material. Onel5969 TT me 12:51, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, we do not protect pages against one user. Please sort this out with the user.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:56, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – After the block of the IP yesterday [67] [68], the same IP hopper (disruptive IP range partially blocked) is vandalizing the page again, removing sourced content, adding unsourced content [69]. Older vand by IP [70], [71]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:00, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Non-admin comment Fylindfotberserk, I confirm that IP 122.177.5.90 is a same range as 122.177.228.240 so rangeblock needs to be applied to both users. I want to ping MelanieN and Ohnoitsjamie for that issue to impose a rangeblock for these IPs. I see this in edit history that edits by 2 IPs are similar. 118.96.191.51 (talk) 07:15, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. The range is partially blocked as of now, but they keep on vandalizing the articles. This article requires protection for sometime in my opinion. These dynamic IPs change fast I believe. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:22, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 13:51, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: IP users add unsourced and problematic content. Wario-Man (talk) 08:20, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 13:47, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated attempts over months now to add personal opinion to lead. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:11, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 13:56, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Total semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IP accounts (unidentified) traced from Turkey and Azerbaijan trying to disrupt the Wikipedia activities, promoting pan-Turkist and AKP propaganda, as well as hatred on Armenia, Greece, Iran, Russia and other countries that do not approve Turkish government's policies and rewriting history about Turkey's atrocities. ZaDoraemonzu (talk) 13:40, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:21, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Noting that the most recent reverted edits were from an IP that geolocates to US. The amount of disruption/vandalism seems too great for PC to be effective. Given the contentiousness of the subject, this seems the best recourse. I will note that other suggested remedies are unlikely to be effective. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:21, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Not done --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:34, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Changed my mind. @ZaDoraemonzu: Pending changes seems to be doing the job. The assertions you make about, "IP accounts (unidentified) traced from Turkey and Azerbaijan trying to disrupt the Wikipedia activities, promoting pan-Turkist and AKP propaganda, as well as hatred on Armenia, Greece, Iran, Russia and other countries that do not approve Turkish government's policies and rewriting history about Turkey's atrocities," while emotionally charged, do not see reflective of the current situation. The most recent IP from Turkey edit was not as you portrayed here. Most recent reverts from an IP in the US look like an content dispute. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:34, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent minor vandalism. Atlantic306 (talk) 01:47, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 13:35, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Recurrent addition of same unsourced controversial claim by IPs. Innisfree987 (talk) 02:25, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 13:41, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 13:41, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ----Rdp060707 (Your questions?/My fight against the devil) 05:30, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not just temporary; it has been vandalised in a sustained manner for a very long time by multiple IPs and single-purpose accounts. I think a permanent autoconfirmed-only cover is needed. Caste is a touchy issue in India and this vandalism is unlikely to ever abate. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse | fings wot i hav dun 05:38, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator EvergreenFir. Airplaneman (talk) 13:44, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 18:36, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:02, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Idell (talk) 22:27, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. This is a content dispute between two experienced editors and is being discussed on the article talk page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:19, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated fandalism from dynamic IPs. Pelagicmessages ) – (23:07 Sat 28, AEDT) 12:07, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:21, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of disruptive/vandalous edits from IP editors the past few weeks. Requesting indef because this page has been protected 8 times since August 2018.  Bait30  Talk 2 me pls? 19:10, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:09, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Lots of unsourced BLP info including a supposed WP:DOB repeatedly being added from a wave of IPs since September. Toddst1 (talk) 22:30, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This looks like a CoI editor and the additions are mostly copyright violations of this site. If the problem persists, I suggest you report it to ANI. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:12, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Seanjuniorworks (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:18, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP range partially blocked, vandalizing the article. See [72], [73]. In WP:AIV, report against IPs that are partially range blocked gest dismissed. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:31, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. The original rangeblock has been expanded. If that still doesn't solve the problem, ask again. MelanieN (talk) 01:26, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – subject has died. important figure in Iranian nuclear bomb project. Idan (talk) 15:59, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 01:39, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – So many IP user vandals, request protection. Larryzhao|Talk|Contribs 17:31, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 01:42, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous editing of genres by non consistent users, normally IPs, often to add it being a Christmas film. It's the only thing they really edit, so it's no loss if they can't edit it for a while. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 14:11, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Article is already PC protected. Insufficient disruptive edits to justify PC protection and semi-protection. ‑Scottywong| [talk] || 01:05, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection (until the show has ended): the reason is because many users are vandalising the page by removing content [74] and this user User:42.60.30.242 despite many warnings and explanation about the font size should be 70 and not 60 as no one can read it properly he keeps doing the same thing again [75] please could you do this.

User:42.60.30.242 Has done more despite explaining him not to do this. [76] [77] [78] please protect the page please — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4C8:B4:5056:8C1B:254F:D577:D550 (talk) 17:33, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ‑Scottywong| [spill the beans] || 01:09, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – multiple IP's inserting joke names.  A S U K I T E   22:17, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Fuzheado. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:18, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Only used in a few pages, and extended confirmed users would never vandalize pages. Best regards, 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 18:40, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Clearly still a high-risk target for disruptive editing (not just vandalism). I can't see any reason that this image needs to be unprotected. The image shouldn't require frequent editing, and any rare editing it requires can be done in the form of edit requests on the talk page. ‑Scottywong| [confess] || 01:19, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotect - it's been over a full year now. I think it's safe to unprotect or at the very least, reduce to semi-protection. GoodDay (talk) 15:22, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Given how controversial US politics still are, I think it would be a terrible idea to unprotect this template at this time. The nature of this template is such that it should require very infrequent updates. Making an edit request every few years is not too much to ask, for a template that is likely to attract disruptive edits. ‑Scottywong| [confess] || 01:19, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Content dispute. Khirurg (talk) 23:24, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. ‑Scottywong| [converse] || 23:11, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. (CC) Tbhotch 03:13, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ‑Scottywong| [gossip] || 23:20, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. User:Namiba 14:30, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:34, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Grawp is long gone. Best regards, 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 18:50, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected I've fully unprotected this redirect since it has been fully protected for so long, and the threat of disruptive edits has almost certainly passed. Semi-protecting the page would likely be pre-emptive at this point, so I'd like to see if it can exist without protection first. ‑Scottywong| [chat] || 01:25, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 09:00, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:08, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 09:04, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:14, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This article has had a recent history of both obvious vandalism, and edit warring over the lyrics being caused by IP accounts. -- Tytrox (talk) 11:23, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:16, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Can we semi for a few days until the IP / unconfirmed editor gets bored of adding the same unsourced promo & OR content?. -- a they/them | argue | contribs 11:51, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:20, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:30, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:24, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 04:56, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [speak] || 23:26, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. .💠245CMR💠.👥📜 06:06, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [babble] || 23:29, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EN-JungwonTalk 08:36, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [soliloquize] || 23:31, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, specifically the continued promotion of Jimmy Carter as a potential candidate against the consensus in the talk page, addition of potential candidates without reliable sources speculating runs, and removal of potential candidates with reliable sources speculating runs. Molandfreak (talk, contribs, email) 09:15, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Non admin-comment: This page needs a indefinite semi-protection in order to prevent vandalism from IP user on US election pages. 118.96.191.51 (talk) 20:44, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's see how it goes after that. MelanieN (talk) 23:28, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – With the Flynn pardon, this article is getting a lot of malicious attention. I'd suggest that some of the reverted edits be revdel'ed, as well. Tarl N. (discuss) 21:10, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Source of accusations is a well known Twitter QAnon crank. Koncorde (talk) 21:28, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:30, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent jokes, incorrect information and other intentional vandalism. This stayed in the article for a fortnight because an intermediary vandalism edit was reverted, this one overlooked. Other vandalism from November: [79][80][81]. — Bilorv (talk) 23:48, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [prattle] || 23:13, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Nithintalk 02:40, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [soliloquize] || 23:17, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated removal of sourced info. The-Pope (talk) 04:32, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [converse] || 23:22, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vulnerable topic, has been protected temporarily 8 times. Opalzukor (talk) 08:46, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:21, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

29 November 2020

Semi-protection: Show has been held today, high level of vandalism of people who don't agree with the results. JKOkay (talk) 20:12, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:55, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Page history seems to suggest a latent sock war. SITH (talk) 20:17, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:58, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Persistent vandalism, would also be used for someone to revdelete some of the edits. Richard Nevell (talk) 20:21, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also blocked the block-evading IP editor. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:59, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:53, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ‑Scottywong| [chatter] || 17:45, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:13, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:42, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:19, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:45, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:32, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected through the holiday (expires December 27). GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:47, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:33, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:48, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated edits with unsourced material from various IP editors. Ravensfire (talk) 19:39, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also blocked one of the IPs. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:51, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 19:56, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:54, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistant disruptive editing and a high level of IP vandalism. Repeated reversions and requests to reach a consensus in the talk page have been ignored. Grnrchst (talk) 14:54, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 19:38, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 16:05, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:31, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP vandalism resumed shortly after protection expired. CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 16:07, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:33, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This article has been the subject of disruptive editing by a host of single-purpose accounts and IPs for more than two months now. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 16:24, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. A quick skim shows that the disruption is primarily coming from IPs and very new accounts, so I think semi-protection will be sufficient. If not, feel free to request an increase in the protection level here. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:34, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:25, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:35, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:39, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:36, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of Islamic honorifics by various IPs and new accounts. S0091 (talk) 18:56, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 19:07, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Re-occurrence of the same disruption that caused the recent semi-protection, as soon as it expired. FDW777 (talk) 14:02, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [confabulate] || 17:39, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:29, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. I blocked the /64 range which was causing all of the recent disruption on that page. Please re-report or leave me a message on my talk page if disruption continues. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:39, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 17:57, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [spill the beans] || 18:17, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent death. Lots of unsourced nonsense and vandalism. Egghead06 (talk) 18:02, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [confess] || 18:20, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP and Mobile IP vandalism. Xenologer48 (talk) 18:09, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [spill the beans] || 18:13, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – When looking at the history I didn't see a single productive edit from non-auto confirmed editors since pending changes protection was applied in April. Returning to indefinitie semi seems warranted, especially since unprotection wasn't intentional but the effect of a temporary full protection expiring. --Trialpears (talk) 11:48, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An editors changing birth date on April 9, 1969 from the WP:OR or WP:BLP violation caused of IP Address. 120.29.113.234 (talk) 13:06, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:40, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Prime candidate for PC protection. Rate of edits to the article is quite low, and many of those edits are vandalism. ‑Scottywong| [confess] || 17:36, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Ongoing content dispute during a merge proposal. Protection would hopefully encourage more discussion and prevent further warring. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 03:01, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected – 2 months. Sockpuppetry. EdJohnston (talk) 03:09, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. Mahmoud The Beast (talk) 09:43, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Requesting semi for like a week Asartea Talk Contributions 09:57, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A mass of editors are being createded all adding random material of little or no value It may be a student project but they are not responding to requests to use the talk page. Identical issues on Tacit knowledge, Knowledge sharing and SECI model of knowledge dimensions‎ so if possible semi-protect all four? ---Snowded TALK 11:22, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Controversial subject. a gd fan (talk) 15:59, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note Even if there are arbitration enforcement of it, if it doesn't see any distruptive editing or vandalism by autoconfirmed users (the page currently is semi-protected), pages cannot be protected preemptively. The protection level cannot be changed unless there are vandalism or distruptive editing in the article, even if the article is an arbitration enforcement. 118.96.191.51 (talk) 22:39, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ‑Scottywong| [talk] || 08:26, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Several editors, some of whom have declared that they are the subject, have re-written the article in a way that contravenes a dozen or so policies and guidlines, including cut/paste from the subject's website. I've left the appropriate messages on most of those editors' talk pages, but they don't take any notice of those and persist. At this moment, the article is in an unacceptable state, but I feel reverting again is pointless until the page is protected. Michael Bednarek (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ‑Scottywong| [verbalize] || 08:51, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This user (Dil Ka Jani) had been removing and disrupting this BLP, so as to stop this is better for a semi protection for non-extended user. 'Respect' Mr-5 / M / C🖋 . Mr-5 / M / C🖋 06:09, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ‑Scottywong| [talk] || 08:59, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – We have a persistent IP hopping vandal repeatedly expressing a tedious grudge against the subject of this BLP. DanielRigal (talk) 00:03, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:16, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 mnths, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:16, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: persistent, long term, low intensity vandalism. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:16, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done--Ymblanter (talk) 10:16, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: High-risk template. a gd fan (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. ‑Scottywong| [soliloquize] || 08:18, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Disruptive editing by Jamesbrodi92 (talk). Twixister (talk) 07:25, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ‑Scottywong| [confabulate] || 08:16, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and edit warring. IP edits are typically attempting to introduce POV wording. Bmcollier (talk) 09:22, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:19, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Even after protection, the page is seeing disruption and vandalism. Like changing team names, data, figures. Adding stuff by fans as if this is social media. So, I request for upgradation of protection.  Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe  13:43, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Non-admin comment: ArnabSaha, There is no vandalism in that page. It is more likely a content dispute, so I needs to be fully protected as temporary, as long as it needs a dispute resolution on the talk page. I see that in the history of this page in the past few days so this page cannot bé extend confirmed protected. 36.68.190.244 (talk) 13:51, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. The alternative would be full protection, but the edit warring isn't bad enough for that yet. MelanieN (talk) 22:34, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There are several opened section on the talk page about the related issues. Better becoming full-protected for one week to reach a consensus. Wario-Man (talk) 22:49, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time.. I don't think it has quite reached the point of needing to lock the page. I posted a note on the talk page urging them to discuss the issues. If they won't, full protection may become necessary. MelanieN (talk) 22:51, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. -- /Alex/21 02:50, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [talk] || 08:56, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Occasional but persistent unsourced/disruptive edits since October, strongly resembling behaviour of Albert20009 sock. Dl2000 (talk) 15:31, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [gossip] || 08:25, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. SpectresWrath (talk) 16:45, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [comment] || 08:27, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. (CC) Tbhotch 17:09, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [yak] || 08:31, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated IP vandalism. Engineerchange (talk) 17:36, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 07:01, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long-term problematic editing (removal of well-sourced content, for essentially misogynist reasons); this discussion records a dozen instances between January 2017 and April 2019, but the edits have continued since then, with five more episodes in the past two weeks (see recent edit history) by various IPs. JBL (talk) 22:11, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not enough disruptive activity to justify indef protection. ‑Scottywong| [gossip] || 08:21, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism add was unsourced or not official released by the website. Barneysss talk 01:11, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [babble] || 08:34, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. SangrurUser (talk) 03:36, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 07:00, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and persistent reversions, specifically by IPs: user:181.44.12.149 and user:2800:810:483:8B6A:4967:E2BE:9D62:B0D4. I tried to persuade them to stop it (see User talk:2800:810:483:8B6A:4967:E2BE:9D62:B0D4) but reversions on my edits persisted (see 1, 2, 3) - Fma12 (talk) 01:46, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Non-admin comment Fma12, two IPs now reported to AIV and let see whether two users is blocked. 118.96.191.51 (talk) 02:12, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. ‑Scottywong| [communicate] || 01:18, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Arab israeli conflict. a gd fan (talk) 14:06, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. The page is not getting much vandalism. MelanieN (talk) 23:06, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Microwave Anarchist (talk) 19:51, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Kosack (talk) 22:24, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – There is only vandalism since the protection has been removed. SangrurUser (talk) 03:38, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:07, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of edit warring, editor do not want to engage in talk discussion but want to just write un-referenced material. OnlyTruthShallPrevail (talk) 18:08, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined (Non-administrator comment) Edit warring occurred on November 25, 2020 which resulted in the user being blocked because of it. History does not show any further edit warring. Also semi-protection would have no effect in an edit warring case. Next time warn the user and report to the edit warring noticeboard if needed. Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 20:18, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection: Returning sock-master vandalising articles. GoodDay (talk) 23:11, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done, gave three month semi for the first article and one year pending changes to another one. I do not see an editing pattern which would justify indefinite protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 23:19, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been protected twice recently and the same unsourced content has been added after they have expired. I suggest protecting for a longer duration. ~ ItsJustLukas talk|Contribs 00:41, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:14, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Slight vandalism by IP editors. Would normally not qualify probably but as it is Today's FA I feel that semi protection for at least a day is probably warranted Asartea Talk Contributions 13:28, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for requesting. Vandalism is much worse than at the usual TFA. MelanieN (talk) 23:04, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of controversial material that may contravene WP:UNDUE without following WP:BRD by many IPs. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 15:26, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:10, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Repetitive vandalism by IP users to inject unsubstantiated future uses of the Act by Trump. Legowerewolf (talk) 22:27, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The IPs actually adding unsourced or poorly sourced content for adding a future events, which violates WP:CRYSTAL. 118.96.191.51 (talk) 22:42, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 23:12, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Apparently the same editor on different IPs changing figures to unlikely and uncited numbers repeatedly since April 2020. Escape Orbit (Talk) 22:29, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 23:10, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Subtle vandalism by multiple IPs. ― Tartan357 Talk 22:52, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 23:04, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Many vandals of various political persuasions have assailed the page off-and-on for months. Given this is a BLP page for a US politician, requesting longer protections. Gwen Hope (talk) (contrib) 01:10, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:57, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Non-consensus changes. A complete disregard for the hidden warning "Please do not add unsourced track titles, or those sourced to Genius (WP:USERG)". Joey Camelaroche (talk) 02:18, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:01, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – request page protection, too many IP user vandals. Larryzhao|Talk|Contribs 17:42, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Airplaneman (talk) 18:17, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs have been adding and re-adding some streamer's in-joke to this page. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 18:17, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only one IP editor causing disruption, please report to WP:AIV if they continue. -- LuK3 (Talk) 19:54, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Pahunkat (talk) 21:34, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SPI open here Pahunkat (talk) 21:35, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Widr. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:36, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

30 November 2020

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Isaacbabatundeo and an IP are repeatedly attempting to whitewash this biography or are adding material that is not NPOV or RS. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:53, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The cadence of questionable edits is such that it would be cumbersome for the PC reviewers to monitor. Chetsford (talk) 21:09, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Has not been edited in a year, and no vandalism since 2018, and its not controversial. a gd fan (talk) 14:49, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notifying Materialscientist, the protecting admin, since the OP (that's you, a gd fan) neglected to follow the instructions at the top of this section. Favonian (talk) 20:03, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see a single constructive edit from anonymous IPs or unconfirmed editors in the article history. All of them are disruptive. There was no content-related activity when the article was unprotected before, only vandalism reversion. And naturally, protection has caused all activity to cease, because the only activity the article had was disruptive. That suggests that the only activity the article would experience after unprotection is more of the same disruption it experienced before. If anyone wants to make improvements, it is not hard to create an account and get autoconfirmed. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:13, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
There were two edits to the talk page in May 2019, both reverted as clear vandalism. There were two edits in 2018 and 2017 to rearrange talk page headers, and a bot edited the talk page in 2017. I haven't checked, but even the comments in 2014 and 2013 appear to have been nonsense. I can't see anything else. What I'm saying is that the article should stay protected until a couple of convincing edit requests are made at talk. Johnuniq (talk) 09:09, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. All of the above; edit-requests are possible if anyone wants to contribute constructively. Lectonar (talk) 10:08, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: This is a different page than the one protected. (CC) Tbhotch 00:49, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Primefac (talk) 19:23, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 08:05, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @FilmandTVFan28: On a technical level, if a blocked editor was making inappropriate edits on their talk page, the block would be altered to revoke their ability to edit that page. However, replacing block notices is not disallowed. There is some detail probably somewhere at WP:TPG that says what a blocked editor may not remove, but that relates to when they have an active unblock appeal. Johnuniq (talk) 09:03, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Please add a temporary semi-protection from unauthenticated users because of persistent vandalism from 161.246.145.95 -- Maxim Masiutin (talk) 09:16, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:17, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – recent drama involving pokimane has resulted in increased vandalism to the page. Troutfarm27 (Talk) 09:29, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It was previously semi-protected for a year, which expired in October. Since then it has seen a constant stream of vandalism, especially since this person has been in the news recently. Fuzheado | Talk 13:51, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 4thfile4thrank (talk) 21:38, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ‑Scottywong| [verbalize] || 07:16, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

semi-protection: persistent reverts of content by 4 IP editors and refusal to discuss in the talk page. —Jade Ten (talk) 21:47, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ‑Scottywong| [confess] || 07:14, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – and vandalism. 4thfile4thrank (talk) 02:46, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected ‑Scottywong| [express] || 07:27, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Remove create protection: I am proposing that Richard Sproat should be unprotected from creation. The page was somehow indefintely protected in a batch operation in 2012. Google Scholar shows him to be one of the most cited linguists (c.f. Hagit Borer who has a Wikipedia entry), with ~30k Google Search results, also larger than that of the latter at 24k. I have drafted a first version of the page. Ryanli (talk) 16:29, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Ryanli I cannot see an AfD for the article. It was speedy deleted per WP:A7 in April 2007. I'm not sure your draft establishes notability but normal procedures will need to be followed to investigate that. Johnuniq (talk) 09:22, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism started again shortly after unprotection. Username6892 (Peer Review) 15:43, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 19:42, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Many persistent vandals over good period of time. Gwen Hope (talk) (contrib) 22:43, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [confer] || 07:19, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. User:Namiba 23:53, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [chatter] || 07:22, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 01:05, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [chat] || 07:24, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. persistent BLP vios. HurricaneTracker495 (talk) 02:44, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ‑Scottywong| [confess] || 07:26, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by single IP user. DL6443 22:38, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) DL6443, user is now blocked, hopefully vandalism should subside. Gwen Hope (talk) (contrib) 22:44, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment)The IP user keeps switching IPs to ban evade. Can this RFPP be prioritized please, @Primefac and L235:? Gwen Hope (talk) (contrib) 23:17, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Gwenhope and Primefac, 74.130.17.202 now was blocked for the vandalism. 180.244.146.59 (talk) 23:23, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator L235. (Non-administrator comment) Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 00:13, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated vandalism by drive-by SPA's that have been deleting the controversies section of the article. 192.76.8.81 (talk) 00:08, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 00:16, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Fuzheado: Given the disruption has been going on for a month and a half would it be better to go for a slightly longer protection period? 192.76.8.81 (talk) 00:22, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@192.76.8.81: Let see for one week. If after the article is unprotected vandalism happens again, it will be considered longer protection. 180.244.146.59 (talk) 00:30, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism quickly resumed after unprotection. ANDROS1337TALK 01:27, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. TheSandDoctor Talk 01:30, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, and high level of IP vandalism. TheBlinkster (talk) 20:55, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GorillaWarfare (talk) 21:02, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template Protection: High level of vandalism and Edit-warring. I think WP:PINKLOCK will help. Alphadon (talk) 20:59, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This is a dispute with one user. Recommend dispute resolution. GorillaWarfare (talk) 21:03, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Typical gameday vandalism. Jalen Folf (talk) 22:53, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 00:09, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Owner nonsense takes like a day to stop Gatemansgc (TɅ̊LK) 23:27, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 00:10, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Losts of edit warring/disruption in the past month. HistoryofIran (talk) 16:02, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:29, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Fahim8904 (talk) 17:17, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined We do not protect articles from being reasonably tagged for deletion. Article had been improperly moved and was redirecting from mainspace to the Wikipedia talk space; because it is nowhere near ready for mainspace I moved it back to the draftspace and cleaned up the mess of redirects. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:41, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CoconutOctopus talk 18:39, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:49, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tempoary pending changes protection Persistent disruptive editing/vandalism on the article. –Cupper52Talk to me! 18:41, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:50, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. 4thfile4thrank (talk) 21:57, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator GeneralNotability. (Non-administrator comment) Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 23:04, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]