User talk:LTPHarry

Instead of detaching the SIP Animation header, detach the page with the produced shows

The idea of separating these shows into separate pages is both illogical and unfair. Because the shows are listed on the page even though C&D or Marvel Productions also have their own pages. All of the shows produced before the SIP rebranding were produced under the name of Saban Entertainment, and after the rebranding, all ownership of the company belongs to Saban's successor company BVS. There is no need for the SIP page to be separate. Let's combine these two pages and move all the tv series and films produced into a separate page. Separating the SIP Animation page was a good idea back then, but it is a wrong idea today because it divides the library into two pages. Shows produced by BVS Entertainment and all its subsidiaries should be on a single page. GRPHX-TREME (talk) 23:41, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Saban International Paris was a separate company and animation studio. Why are you still going over this? Luigitehplumber (talk) 00:34, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's obvious that we disagree on this issue. So I have to accept your opinion? GRPHX-TREME (talk) 00:39, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You don’t really seem to understand. Think about Disney for a second, it would be confusing if Walt Disney Animation Studios was part of the Walt Disney Pictures page because they’re two completely different divisions. SIP was the same for Saban/BVS except that they only owned a minorty stake. It would also make the Saban page way, way too long by cramming in everything into a single page. Luigitehplumber (talk) 00:43, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree on this but the library should be on a single page. In other words, there are not many productions here; listing them in the same place will not lengthen the page. In fact, the same should be done for New World Pictures. I don't think this will make the page longer. Take a look, I did something like this, it will shorten both pages, if you don't like it, you can take it back.

List of television series and films by BVS Entertainment

If you would like to improve the page or correct any deficiencies, I would be happy. We are all trying to provide more accurate and consistent information here. GRPHX-TREME (talk) 00:54, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, that’s what you meant. That’s fine with me. I’ll be happy to help out with the program page. Luigitehplumber (talk) 00:56, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are very kind. Thank you very much. Do you think library status should be under this page? GRPHX-TREME (talk) 00:59, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t know, to be honest. Maybe look through the pages to see what looks cleaner. Luigitehplumber (talk) 01:01, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So we will learn this by trying over time. Have a nice day. GRPHX-TREME (talk) 01:09, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

About your edits to Ponyo

Hey LTPHarry, thanks for your contributions to this article! I wanted to let you know that you inserted references in the form of bare URLs, which are undesirable for a number of reasons. I've cleaned up the links this time around, but I'd highly recommend using citation templates in a way that complies with the relevant guidelines in the future. Let me know if you have any questions! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 23:37, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alrighty then! Luigitehplumber (talk) 00:57, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, LTPHarry. Thank you for your work on Boyz/Girlz Channel. Cocobb8, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Great job with the article, though it requires more reliable sources for verification.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Cocobb8}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 14:51, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extending the StudioCanal article

I recently extended the StudioCanal after someone added the more information text back in March 2024. I expanded the history section by adding the company buying companies to expand its operations. 148.252.144.19 (talk) 16:57, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Luigitehplumber (talk) 19:05, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's been two hours and you didn't expand the StudioCanal article. 148.252.144.19 (talk) 21:52, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have other things to do in life and you didn't specifically ask me to do that.

I said "Okay" because you expanded the page and that's what Wikipedia is always about. Luigitehplumber (talk) 21:54, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Atari SA video games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Funland (London)

Hello, LTPHarry. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Funland (London), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:09, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SimCity 2000, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Imagineer (company).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Merlin the Magical Puppy

Hello, LTPHarry. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Merlin the Magical Puppy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:07, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding 2 Entertain/BBC Studios Home Entertainment

Hi LTPHarry, Just So You Know, I'm Very Sorry For All The Disruptive Editing, I Know You've Been Trying Hard To Remove All The Clutter, I Won't Be Re-adding It In, I'm Done With Editing! 217.46.140.107 (talk) 19:10, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing wrong with that, but it’s best to put information that’s more suited for the article. Luigitehplumber (talk) 19:56, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox Television

As I told BaldiBasicsFan, I'm not liking this new guideline about not listing animation studios. It doesn't make sense to assume every animated series was subcontracted instead of co-production without solid evidence. Because of this unfair guideline, I can't even look at my favorite animated shows and I don't mean watching the articles on them. If you want to follow it, be my guest. - FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 05:02, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be honest with you, I'm not a fan of it either; mainly for the same reasons you stated. I think BaldiBasicsFan did say to me that he was thinking about asking to add a section for animation production/distributors or whatnot, but I don't how how that's going to work. Luigitehplumber (talk) 05:14, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]