Talk:Mariana Dahan

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 2 January 2020 by reviewer MurielMary (talk · contribs).

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

current version

This is incredibly non neutral] IMHO, it needs to be reworded or left out. Luck of the draw, it's the revision I protected. Please discuss. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:06, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

@Deepfriedokra: Agreed. For the statement "Mariana Dahan has been recognized as a courageous supporter of women’s rights and a defender of children and women victims of domestic violence" I would ask 'recognised by whom?' and the word courageous is editorialising and non-neutral. The statement would be valid without it, if properly sourced. Re "Featured in The Guardian upon the announcement of Johnny Depp’s failed attempt to intimidate his ex-wife, Dahan stated why the outcome of the lawsuit Depp filed against Amber Heard is so important – and will send a message to women around the world about the extent their voices matter" - she was quoted (not featured) in the Guardian. "Failed attempt to intimidate his wife" is not supported by the source given - there are probably other sources that might, so one should be given. "Stated ... is so important" and "will send a message ..." are the viewpoints of Dahan, not of the Guardian writer or of Wikipedia so that should be made clear. Lastly, the final paragraph formats the quote as an external link and doesn't attribute the quote to Dahan.

I recommend the article is rolled back to the 7 October version. Note, the IP edit on 2 November removing Dahan's date of birth is from the same IP that on 6 October claimed to be the subject of the article. They have not given a reason for removal of the date of birth, but perhaps it is incorrect / not widely known or sensitive given her claim to not have a birth certificate.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:26, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Curb Safe Charmer: You might want to make an edit request as I would be involved. I just too strongly agree with you to appear neutral. Also, the "failed to intimidate" should probably go as BLP. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:31, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When the protecting admin cries Ay! Caramba! and argues against the version they protected, it should count for somethung. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:34, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

edit request done. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:39, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. (or wait till tomorrow when protection expires...) — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:59, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@MSGJ: I thought "I recommend the article is rolled back to the 7 October version" was clear. Is that doable? Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:13, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Didn't read that far! Got lost in the first paragraph — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 14:22, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]