User talk:Peter1170

May 2021

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Healthcare in Qatar into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk/CCI guide} 17:58, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've also received previous warnings for copyright violations. Looking further through you recent contributions I found four more copyright violations on Travel restrictions related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Although the text you copied from the sources are just a few sentences, they're still copyright violations. Given the previous warnings and your repeated removal of any notices on your talk page with little communication, I am going to be blocking you from editing mainspace and draft articles. If wish to appeal the block you must provide a better understanding of copyright. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk/CCI guide} 19:05, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article) and Draft) for copyright violations.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk/CCI guide} 19:06, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Peter1170 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I just copy text from the article about Healhcare in Qatar to the main article about Qatar because there was no information about healthcare with all sources. I even add there Main article: Healthcare in Qatar. During last 5 years, I did almost 6000 edits on Wikipedia and this block is ridiculous. I understand if I am blocked for a period of 2 weeks, but ban like this is just too strict. I am sure everyone make in so many edits some mistake, therefore I ask for the blocking of my account to be lifted. Sorry if i was wrong and unblock me plz, thxxxx

Decline reason:

What you are describing is a violation of copyright. I don't understand why you think this is grounds to have your block lifted. Yamla (talk) 21:13, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Peter1170 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I had no idea thats violating of copyright, when i just copy some information and some text from one wikipedia article to the other. It is still Wikipedia. I wanted to do a good thing, no to vandalize anything. So how long I will be blocked Yamla? Peter1170 (talk) 21:29, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Yes, we know you had no idea it violated copyright, that's why you are blocked. When you are aware of how you violated copyright, please tell us. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:25, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Appealing your block

Sorry, I saw your message on my talk at the time but I wasn't able to respond to it. If you want to be unblocked you'll need to demonstrate a better understanding of copyright; you indicate on my talk that you've done some reading and understand it better, but I'd like to see more specific examples of how you understand before I unblock you. You can do this in a few different ways such as providing examples of how you will write differently, but you can also write a few sentences down here or on a subpage, like you would if you were unblocked and editing articles again. It should have a source or two and it can be about whatever you want; if it does not have any copyright violations I will take that as a sign that your understanding has improved and will unblock you. How does that sound? Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk/CCI guide} 17:39, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Special ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.

Please note, due to a technical error you may not have been able to previously vote, or you may have received this message twice or after opting out. This is a one-time notification. If you are having any issues voting now, please contact the election coordinators for assistance. Thank you!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]