User talk:Iterresise

i am in support of the dissolution of:

This user has been banned indefinitely from editing the English Wikipedia by the community. Administrators, please review the banning policy before unblocking.
(block log · contributions · ANI discussion)

Community ban

Per the discussion at ANI you are now banned by the Wikipedia community from editing the Englsh Wikipedia as described at WP:CBAN. You may appeal the ban either to the community or to ArbCom, though it is suggested that this be done no sooner than after 6 months from the ban. - Aoidh (talk) 01:27, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

yes: i need to appeal this ban. i just checked ani: found out the discussion was archived and looked and saw this. i was hoping to let it archive with out further incident. Iterresise (talk) 05:35, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

user:Aoidh: what are the next steps? Iterresise (talk) 07:01, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aoidh left two links in their message. The first is for ANI which you have seen. The second provides the technical information. Johnuniq (talk) 07:24, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The specific instructions for appealing this can be found at Wikipedia:Banning policy#Appeals of bans imposed by the community, more specifically the second bullet point that begins with Editors who cannot edit any page except their own talk page. I would highly advise that you read Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks before submitting an appeal, as it gives good advice. The Special situations section that applies here is the Banned users section, but I would advise reading the page in its entirety. - Aoidh (talk) 08:16, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #80813 is closed.

Response carried over-- "Welp, the thing to do is to request unblocking on your talk page, copying the unblock template to the bottom of your talk and addressing the concerns by replacing "your reason here " in the unblock template.

  {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

As this is a Community Ban, it will then need to be carried over to WP:AN. The gist I get is that you continued editing in a concerning matter after the ANI thread was under way. You'll need to address that as well. You'll need to be prepared to answer the Community's questions and concerns in responses on your talk page, which would then be carried over to the Community discussion. Best." -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:51, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Adding ANI discussion link as I do not see it. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:43, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iterresise (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

this is a proforma request and as explained in the u.t.r.s. appeal, i disengaged so that no further incidents would occur and so that none of my statements would be turned against me. this however did still happen and i believe the time has been served.Iterresise (talk) 22:37, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline, duplicate. Yamla (talk) 11:38, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It should be noted that you disengaging from the ANI discussion was not the reason for the ban, and this unblock request does not in any way address the issues that led to the ban. With this in mind, are you certain that this is the unblock request that you would like copied over to WP:AN for community discussion? I ask this to give you a chance to adjust the wording of your unblock request (and again I would suggest you read WP:GAB and use that to help with writing an unblock request), but if you're satisfied with the wording I (or someone else) will copy this over for you, just let me know. - Aoidh (talk) 04:34, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

one of the reasons is my last comment at the ani discussion where i raised whether this is a last word issue. it's unfortunate that it was construed as uncivil or an insult.Iterresise (talk) 03:51, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You were asked if your unblock request was the statement you wanted transferred to a noticeboard for community discussion. If it is, it will likely be insufficient- you need to do as Aoidh states. 331dot (talk) 10:05, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You've two open unblock requests. Jumping back in momentarily to ask you to describe what you did to get blocked-- what prompted the report at ANI-- and what you would do different. (Most members of the Community cannot see UTRS tickets.) And now, 331dot, back over to you. Best -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:04, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iterresise (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

this is a proforma request and as explained in the u.t.r.s. appeal, i disengaged so that no further incidents would occur and so that none of my statements would be turned against me. yet my last comment with regards to a last word issue was turned against me. we could open up another ani but will this happen again? i believe the time has been served.Iterresise (talk) 04:44, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

See below — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:03, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ultimately the unblock request has to be your own, however as Deepfriedokra pointed out your unblock request does not address the reason for the ban or why it is no longer needed, which is usually the bare minimum that a successful unblock should contain. You can replace the text of the open unblock request above instead of opening another one, but either way once you are satisfied with the unblock request (or if you feel the one above is sufficient) make a comment below the unblock request saying something like Please move this unblock request to AN for community review. and it will be moved over for you. - Aoidh (talk) 14:38, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]