Talk:Slaughter & the Dogs
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
 | The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
References to Compilations
[edit]- In his / her eagerness to delete what was thought of as 'trivia', Spylab also mucked up all the references (at the bottom of the page) from number 3 onwards. Also, sadly, the track 'Cranked Up Really High' does not appear on numerous compilations. The Paul Morley compilation is also noteworthy because of the prior statements in the article regarding the Manchester punk scene. (The compilation in question being an overview of Manchester's, and Liverpool's, punk, new wave and post-punk). Yozzer66 (talk) 23:45, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
- 'Streets' is widely regarded as a seminal compilation album. 'Oi! the Album', and others like it, are a mere historical footnote (if that). Yozzer66 (talk) 19:06, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm quite certain that more people today have heard about Oi! the Album than Streets. The only source showing that Streets is a notable compilation is one non-famous punk website.Spylab (talk) 19:25, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
More Americans may have heard of Interpol than Joy Division. More Brits may have heard of Greenday than Stiff Little Fingers. What's your point? As someone who lived through the punk era, I can assure you that 'Streets' had significance; some of which only became obvious with the passage of time. It was the template for all future 'samplers' of British 'indie' labels. Yozzer66 (talk) 19:37, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
- On Wikipedia it is not up to individual editors to "assure" anyone of anything. They have to provide reliable references to back up their factual claims. Perhaps you can seek out more references that show the notability of Streets, instead of just one little-known punk rock website.Spylab (talk) 20:10, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
- The description of the album’s significance in the article was not mine, or any Wikipedian’s, but a fully referenced source. If you do not believe it is a fair description then find a contradicting source and fully reference it. Yozzer66 (talk) 20:15, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, and that reference is a single obscure punk rock website, which hardly meets Wikipedia's standards of verifiability and reliable sources.Spylab (talk) 20:56, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
- On this and other discussion pages, you keep on referring to trakMARX as an 'obsure' source. Just take the time and look at the people you wrote for it... Whilst not quite a veritable A-Z of the British punk scene, it is a fairly impressive list! Instead of attempting to discredit a fully referenced source, why not allow the reader to reach his/her own conclusions. They can easily trace the source of the assessment. Yozzer66 (talk) 21:04, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Yes, it is just one largely-unknown punk rock website; hardly an overwhelming list of reliable souces. Also, you keep reverting the text so it seems as if the website's opinions are absolute fact, thus violating Wikipedia's standards for neutral point of view.Spylab (talk) 21:09, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Spylab, the quotation marks around the Seminal description should speak for themselves. I welcome your contributions. The article 'Slaughter & the Dogs' had only been edited twice in six months before I began work on it. It wasn't in a good state. As this is only one of numerous articles I'm currently attempting to improve, it's good to share the load. Yozzer66 (talk) 21:17, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Current members
[edit]This diff updates current members. It would be good to 1) be reffed, 2) be included in the body. Wwwhatsup (talk) 10:59, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- I'm curious... why isn't ed garrity in the infobox as a former member? duncanrmi (talk) 11:19, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
- That entry was removed by Wayne's IP with this edit, I just restored it. Robman94 (talk) 19:47, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Slaughter & The Dogs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080630071345/http://punkmodpop.free.fr/slaughterandthedogs_pic.htm to http://punkmodpop.free.fr/slaughterandthedogs_pic.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081008060757/http://web.telia.com/~u31309301/slaughterandthedogseng.htm to http://web.telia.com/~u31309301/slaughterandthedogseng.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:30, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Slaughter & the Dogs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161013223414/http://www.allmusic.com/album/do-it-dog-style-bonus-tracks-mw0000067491 to http://www.allmusic.com/album/do-it-dog-style-bonus-tracks-mw0000067491;
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:50, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:05, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
