User talk:SpectresWrath

Welcome!

Hello, SpectresWrath, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Panda619 (talk) 02:56, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 23:20, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck

豊かな十年へようこそ/WELCOME TO THE D20s

Miraclepine wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and a prosperous decade of change and fortune.
このミラ PはSpectresWrathたちのメリークリスマスも新年も変革と幸運の豊かな十年をおめでとうございます！
フレフレ、みんなの未来！/GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR FUTURE!
ミラ P 05:04, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Is It Wrong to Try to Pick Up Girls in a Dungeon? into List of Is It Wrong to Try to Pick Up Girls in a Dungeon? light novels. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 23:15, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (2nd request)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from List of That Time I Got Reincarnated as a Slime episodes into That Time I Got Reincarnated as a Slime (season 1). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:19, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (3rd request)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from List of Nura: Rise of the Yokai Clan episodes ‎ into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 11:00, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Beyblade: Metal Fusion (season 1), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 06:21, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Beyblade: Metal Fusion (season 1), you may be blocked from editing. AussieLegend (✉) 02:43, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just to clarify, this reversion] was inappropriate for two reasons. Per infobox instructions, country names are not linked so Japan should not be linked. The episode list that you added is inconsistent with the parent article, Beyblade: Metal Fusion, lists Beyblade: Metal Fusion (season 1) as the episode list for the series and you have provided no justification for your edits. --AussieLegend (✉) 02:54, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! AussieLegend (✉) 02:45, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You need to slow down with the CSD tagging, such as here and here. Incorrect speedy deletion tags can be very disruptive. Moreover, there doesn't appear to be anything wrong with most of the redirects that you've been tagging. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 06:16, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Haikyu!! (season 1). If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 00:02, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just to clarify, it does appear that a number of the episode summaries have been copied from the sources mentioned on the deletion tag. If you wish to contest the deletion you should remove all of the summaries that appearto have been copied from other sources. --AussieLegend (✉) 00:04, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Even you can by reading them that they written here first, then copied on to another website. I seen this happened alot of times. I even left a in the talk page that that everything was copied from List of Haikyu!! episodes. SpectresWrath (talk) 00:31, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I checked back to the first version of List of Haikyu!! episodes, on 31 August 2015‎, created by Aninonymous. The apparently copied text was present in that version, and in all later versions. And in those cases where minor changes were made to the text, the older version was closer to that now on themoviedb.org /tv/60863-haikyuu/episodes?credit_id=5a0b0acf925141310f01ac20&person_id=5385d0180e0a26144d001421, which appears to date from before 2015. This is a classic situation when the Wikipedia text was in fact copied long ago from an external source, and then gradually modified. I am very aware of the "backwards copy" kid of situation, where another site copies from Wikipedia and is then claimed to be the source, and I have rejected a number of tags for speedy deletion when I could show that it applied. It doesn't appear to me to be th4e case here. I have therefore deleted Haikyu!! (season 1), and all but the few recent revisions of List of Haikyu!! episodes that do not contain the episode summaries. If you can show me any trustworthy evidence that the external page was first created after 31 August 2015‎, that would make a difference.Unfortunately the Internet Archive does not apparently does not capture this site, I suspect because it is generated dynamically from a database. I am sorry, and this was none of your doing, but the copyright policy on Wikipedia is strict. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 01:34, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, before you do significant copies from one page on Wikipedia to another, please read Copying within Wikipedia for the proper procedures. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 01:34, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you at least show me the history link from 17:54, 28 June 2020 so I can restore the page without the summaries because this isn't right for other people. SpectresWrath (talk) 02:50, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Season summary articles movings

SpectresWrath, greetings. I have noticed your recent actions in terms of moving for anime season summary articles. While I agree with the naming conventions as per WP:TVSEASON, I believe all summary articles of a particular series should be renamed, including season 1 as well as per WP:TITLECON. All summary articles of a particular series should be consistent. Unnamelessness (talk) 06:16, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Could you give me an example. SpectresWrath (talk) 22:02, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What I've done:

Date A Live (season 1) → Date A Live I for the consistency of "Date A Live + [a roman numeral]".

Some other series should've done:

A Certain Magical Index (season 1) → A Certain Magical Index I for the consistency of "A Certain Magical Index + [a roman numeral]".
Psycho-Pass (season 1) → Psycho-Pass 1 for the consistency of "Psycho-Pass + [a natural number]".

Naming conventions need to be consistent as per WP:TITLECON. It just cannot be like XXX (season 1) for the first season, XXX 2/3/4 for the rest seasons. Article names should be fixed in one style. Unnamelessness (talk) 03:49, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@SpectresWrath:, You obviously don't understand what I mean. Unnamelessness (talk) 08:20, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, I understand after seeing it, but the official title for season one doesn't have the one in it, so renamed it with (2013 TV series) like how High School DxD season one has it. SpectresWrath (talk) 20:53, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@SpectresWrath:, The High School DxD series is another situation. Season 2/3/4 have their independent names, i.e. New, Born, Hero, so the naming conventions are their official names. However, the official name of season 1 is High School DxD, which has already been occupied, so we need an extra "(2012 TV series)" for disambiguation as per WP:NCTV.

As for series like Date A Live, they are in another scenario. Their naming conventions are "[series name] + [season number]", except for season 1, which is inconsistency in terms of Wikipedia's naming rules. Season 1 should've named in the same format, not just its official name. For some other examples, you can go and check The Amazing Race series. Unnamelessness (talk) 02:55, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fairy Gone

Again, I see you are moving article content again, without proper attribution. You know, or you should know, how to do this properly. Drmies (talk) 21:25, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SpectresWrath, I saw the three requests left above by Diannaa. You again copied a bunch of content. You must not have read WP:Copying within Wikipedia: the very first paragraph tells you how to do it. Now I revert you, and you revert again, and I do the actual work for you at List of Fairy Gone episodes--and you have nothing to say? You need to explain what is going on or you might end up blocked for WP:CIR. Drmies (talk) 21:31, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- One, I mentioned and linked the new page in my edit summary to tell everyone where the info was going. Two, I also used the template:copied on the new page's talk page as well. You just reverted my edit so fast without even checking. SpectresWrath (talk) 22:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thank you. I wish you had given attribution in the edit summary, like the first paragraph of that page says--and I wish I didn't have to twist your arm for you to communicate. Drmies (talk) 23:46, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    - I did as "Moved to new page" with the link in the edit summary. SpectresWrath (talk) 00:08, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      - Lesigh. You should have put the attribution in the edit summary of the first creation of the new article. Seriously. It is in the NEW article that attribution needs to be given. Drmies (talk) 01:17, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Protection

If you need several related pages protected can you put them all in one section please. It makes it a lot easier. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 09:42, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tip. SpectresWrath (talk) 00:36, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Simplifying Toonami English airdates on episode list articles

Hey SpectreWrath, I think it's about time we had a discussion, whether here or bringing it to Toonami's talk page for public consensus, on how we should add English airdates of Toonami going forward, atleast, on the actual anime episode lists that is.

There have been several incosistencies (especially recently with the edit war at Attack on Titan (season 4)'s page about if the date should reflect the promotional or actual airdate) and its just shown how much of a complete mess this has been. Its not just that: Black Clover, Boruto, Kill la Kill, and several other episode lists have editors using the calendar date (Sunday) of broadcast.

Many late-night anime airdates in Japan (post-24:00, or 12:00 a.m. JST) for episode articles have been using the actual date instead of the promotional date, and I believe Toonami should follow this editing standard.

Here's my editing proposal and reasons and why this should be the case:

First and foremost, I think we should keep List of programs broadcast by Toonami with the Saturday dates as is, due to the disclaimer of the dates being used are Toonami's promotional dates.
Going forward, with all Toonami anime episode premieres that air AFTER 12:00 a.m. ET, the date on episode lists should reflect its actual broadcast date. This will simplify airdate editing and fix the incosistencies we are experiencing. Any premiere that happens BEFORE 12:00 a.m. ET should remain with the Saturday date. (Currently, Toonami does not have a timeslot pre-12:00 a.m. ET, so this will be easy to implement for the immediate future).
Why Eastern Time?: We will do this because of three factors: #1, this is the timezone Adult Swim focuses their promos on. #2, this is the timezone Adult Swim HQ is located in. #3, ET and PT airtimes are the same because the West Coast generally uses a 3 hour delayed feed.
I also have a basis for this change: if you go to Adult Swim's schedule (https://www.adultswim.com/schedule/) and go on shows, depending on what timezone you are in, it'll show you the actual date instead of the promotional date.

Any thoughts? I felt like you are one of the people I had to talk about this with the most. This is a compelling case I presented, and this consensus wouldn't cause anymore edit warring because we could source this back here or Toonami's talk page. GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 01:07, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you because theirs too many issues for airdates even though Toonami and Adult Swim are the official sources. Plus, we should mention it on the talk page too before it starts another edit war. SpectresWrath (talk) 02:44, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This should be a pretty straight forward case considering this is how Japan's original airdates are done for late night anime. I don't think we will have any problem implementing this.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 02:53, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@SpectresWrath: I have begun the process of moving dates. This process will be slow and diffucult, especially when I have to go and fact check the timeslots. I've already noticed that a few ORIGINAL air dates from Japan have the promotional date, too, so not only do I have to go over Toonami air dates, but I have to check and make sure these original ones are correct with the available sources I have.

The good news is, it's pretty easy to backtrack Toonami air dates thanks to this Wiki Fandom page, even including the sources from Toonami Facebook! Anyways, feel free to help me out if you want, but you'd have to review and check official sources until you are sure.GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 05:21, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Which series have to be fixed? SpectresWrath (talk) 01:59, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@SpectresWrath: I am about 75% done with Toonami airdate transitions, so it looks like I won't be needing your help. Hopefully I should be done sometime this week.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 02:26, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Hello, I'm Link20XX. I noticed that you recently removed content from Redo of Healer without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Link20XX (talk) 19:37, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I asked previously for you to provide reasoning and you did not.

Talk Page : Demon Slayer The Movie Mugen Train

Hi, Can you please share a comment in the talk page of Demon Slayer: Kimetsu no Yaiba the Movie: Mugen Train regarding the proposed new sections in the article. Your comment is necessary for the success of the discussion. いちかかすが (talk) 13:47, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. On Mars Red. — Diannaa (talk) 12:28, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I put a source right next to it though. That still doesn't count. SpectresWrath (talk) 01:46, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Naruto Shippuden season 16

I appreciate the addition of the English air date side in preparation for the Adult Swim airing, but let's try to keep it within reach. While this one can stay up, I don't think we should do it to all following seasons due to Toonami's tendencies to remove long running anime like One Piece and Boruto from the schedule. Luckily it does not look like that will happen, but just in case.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 06:20, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. SpectresWrath (talk) 16:34, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks You!

Hello. Thanks a lot SpectresWrath for your magnificent work Naruto Shippuden episode lists. I'm very thankful to you for adding episode numbers within the seasons for all 21 seasons that I originally wanted to do myself but I was honestly struggling with just learning how to create columns. I'm sorry for the late response I should've thanked you earlier but I was actually blocked for open proxy. I have no idea what open proxy means (I tried learning on the wiki page but I'm sure my connection is secure). Anyway, thanks a bunch for helping me out so greatly. — Murtaza9761 (talk) 08:28, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. SpectresWrath (talk) 01:47, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of programs broadcast by Toonami

Sorry, but JoJo is leaving the lineup for good. It's perfectly sourced on many sites, including The Verge, that Netflix will be airing Stone Ocean and SPIRAL CURSE DEMARCO is Jason DeMarco's verified account, blue checkmark and all. I'm disappointed, too, but it's all true. I am reverting the edit. Matty-chan (talk) 03:14, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I know its true but doesn't need to be mentioned in notes. SpectresWrath (talk) 04:37, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring on A Certain Scientific Accelerator (TV series)

Hello, this is the first time I have heard that an episode table is under a broadcast section. Can you give me a proof of that? Okay, I modeled the sections to Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. so try to edit that. I am pretty sure that the Marvel Cinematic Universe task force will revert your edit like what I am doing with your edit on the Accelerator article. Centcom08 (talk) 16:29, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Scarlet Nexus (TV series)#Broadcast, 86 (novel series)#Anime, The World's Finest Assassin Gets Reincarnated in Another World as an Aristocrat#Anime, The Faraway Paladin#Anime, Platinum End#Anime and a bunch of anime that aren't long enough to be separated from its main page. I didn't even know the A Certain Scientific Accelerator episodes were separated because its a short anime and didn't need a page in my opinion. SpectresWrath (talk) 19:44, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The first example you have given doesn't follow MOS:TVRELEASE and the rest are not television articles so that doesn't count as the proof I wanted. I created a separate article for it because it has a lot of information that can be used to make a standalone article instead of being a summarized section of an article of the same name. You know, those articles you've mentioned, they have a ton of information if you read and watch some interviews worth notability instead of standard "announcement" info that I've seen in MAJORITY of anime articles. Centcom08 (talk) 20:21, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I gave you examples for the episode list. SpectresWrath (talk) 20:25, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Again, can you please give me a sample of a television article with the episode table that is located on the Broadcast section or any television article that follows MOS:Television since A Certain Scientific Accelerator (TV series) is a television article? Centcom08 (talk) 20:31, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Attack on Titan (TV series) SpectresWrath (talk) 20:32, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article doesn't have a BROADCAST section so this doesn't serve as a proof I wanted. Centcom08 (talk) 20:38, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article) and Draft) for copyright violations.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk/CCI guide} 04:42, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When making this block, I'm ignoring the numerous false speedy deletion notices you have gotten- instead, I am basing it on warnings you have received for copying individual plot summaries. You were first warned about this in December 2020, and were again warned in April 2021- there, you claimed "I put a source right next to it though. That still doesn't count." If I am understanding what you are saying there correctly, you purposely pasted the content in because you believe that it's ok to copy from a website as long as it is cited. This is not accurate- even if the website is cited, it is not ok to copy from. This lines up with your recent edit to The Strongest Sage With the Weakest Crest- you cited the source you copied from in the edit. You have over 8000 edits, you cannot continue to edit with this misapprehension. If you want to be unblocked, you must demonstrate a better understanding of copyright and commit to not copying from sources. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk/CCI guide} 05:11, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SpectresWrath (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There are other anime pages that has refs next to their plots. I just found two of them. Also, is there a link to a copyright page explaining that section for me to read because being partially blocked is no different than a full block. Plus, I won't argue anymore about this if I'm wrong. SpectresWrath (talk) 23:34, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"There are other anime pages that has refs next to their plots." What does that have to do with copyright violations? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:16, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To be clear, there is nothing wrong with adding a reference a plot summary. The problem is with you copying text from the reference. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk/CCI guide} 00:34, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's why I add the ref to it but at this point there's no reason in arguing anymore since you agree with me adding a ref and I should've just tried to make an original summary for those three pages I edited over the years. SpectresWrath (talk) 01:20, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SpectresWrath (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I just want to edit again because I have no more excuses to give. I know it's my fault for not following the rules. SpectresWrath (talk) 05:56, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is a good start, but as copyright violations potentially put Wikipedia in legal jeopardy, we must be convinced that you understand what copyright is, when and how copyrighted content can be used on Wikipedia, and specifically what you will do to avoid copyright violations in the future. Please review WP:COPYVIO. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:26, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

SpectresWrath (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is my final time trying "unblock" because I did it too many times already so let's straight to the point. I have read the COPYVIO link given to me, especially the section about "Addressing contributors" but I truly have nothing else to say anymore. At this point you can only trust me not to do it again or fully block me from everything. SpectresWrath (talk) 01:45, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SpectresWrath&oldid=1066341738#January_2022 Per conversation below Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk/CCI guide} 02:09, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Someone else will review your request, but it is unlikely you will be unblocked based on "trust me". You must demonstrate your understanding. 331dot (talk) 12:45, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I honestly don't know what else to say anymore to convince everyone to let me edit again. I read the COPYVIO and it basically says do not copyright unless the copyright holder wishes to "donate" it. Otherwise, we editors are suppose to remove the text while admins remove the copyright history and block the editor adding it. SpectresWrath (talk) 17:17, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you understand that you should not copy plot summaries from other places, and do you commit to not copying them in the future? Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk/CCI guide} 18:55, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. SpectresWrath (talk) 22:59, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's good enough for me. Please be careful in the future, it is very hard to appeal second copyright violation blocks... Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk/CCI guide} 02:11, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Made in Abyss episode list summary change

I added some info to the summary of episode 13 as it is twice the length of a normal episode. Wanted to let you know as you have written many(if not all) of them.*LittleFinn9* (talk) 19:32, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just moved the episode list to a separate page. I didn't write any of the summaries so don't have to ask me for permission. SpectresWrath (talk) 02:06, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, My bad. Sorry! *LittleFinn9* (talk) 06:29, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (4th request)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Durarara!! into List of Durarara!! episodes. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 02:43, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from The Case Study of Vanitas into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:01, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Attribution in the edit summary

Hi SpectresWrath. Thank you for adding the {{Copied}} template to talk pages such as Talk:List of Diabolik Lovers episodes. Please also ensure that you are providing attribution in the edit summary of the edit in which you are copying content. For example, you can use an edit summary like copied content from [[Diabolik Lovers]]; see that page's history for attribution. Per WP:Copying within Wikipedia#Proper attribution, while the talk page template is helpful, the edit summary attribution is required. Thanks! DanCherek (talk) 04:27, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation at Housing Complex C

Your edit to Housing Complex C has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. DanCherek (talk) 18:17, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I guess you didn't actually understand what I was telling you back in January. I've again blocked you for copyright violations. Given the previous block and unblock discussion, I'm not really sure what to tell you. Moneytrees🍔(Talk) 18:50, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's the only thing I can find out about that series plot, there's no more information until more announcements are made. How would you write a plot summary for a show that you know nothing about. Come on, I don't even copyright like the average user. Plus, that plot came from Crunchyroll, I don't use variety for sources. SpectresWrath (talk) 02:50, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You don't need to have a plot summary, though. The article isn't in any danger of being deleted or otherwise tampered with if it doesn't have one. Or you could just "quote" the synopsis. It doesn't really matter where the content is copied from; it was copied from somewhere, which is a problem. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 03:19, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how to quote. I never even heard about that method before. SpectresWrath (talk) 03:55, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not Moneytrees, but my advice would be to read Wikipedia:Quotations. The gist of it is using quotation marks, quote as little as necessary, and properly attributing that quote (who said it and citing that source). But you should really read that page to really understand how that works. I'd also suggest reading everything linked above by DanCherek because if you continue to have issues with copyright violations, you'll be blocked. So please take eveyone's advice seriously. Clovermoss (talk) 04:25, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you have questions in general about editing, the Teahouse is a great place to ask. It's geared towards helping new editors. If there's something in particular you find confusing, you can always post there and receive a reasonably fast response because lots of editors are active there. Clovermoss (talk) 04:28, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see now that you are currently blocked from editing articles and that you've been around since 2019. I'm sorry I missed that. Is there anything in particular you're confused about? It appears you have some misunderstandings about how copyright violations work? Copying text verbatim (also known as copy-and-pasting content into Wikipedia) is pretty much always a copyright violation. In some circumstances, like a brief quote, you can copy text, but it has to be properly attributed. The linked page in my first comment above explains how quotes work a bit more in-depth, but if you're having a hard time grasping the concept of copyright in general, it might be a good idea to figure that out first. The key thing to remember is that you should be writing content in your own words, not copying, and citing your sources. Does that make sense? Clovermoss (talk) 04:55, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My copying within Wikipedia edits aren't the problem here, I always use the Template:Copied to let everyone know where the info came from. The plot summary I added on Housing Complex C was the cause of this. SpectresWrath (talk) 05:02, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but I got the impression that you copied the plot summary? If that's not true, I apologize. It's just the impression I got from reading the comments above. We can copy text within Wikipedia as long as we attribute it (Content copied from [blank]; see that page's history for attribution) but websites like Crunchyroll don't have a Creative Commons licence. So we can't do that. So copying a plot summary, or closely paraphrasing it, would be a copyright violation. Clovermoss (talk) 14:55, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Then, how come on some pages their plot summaries have a ref next to it. I can't write an original plot summary for a show I know nothing about. If someone had told me about quoting, I probably could've used that after learning how to use it. But like I told Moneytrees, I'm done because there's no point in using an account that can't edit pages anymore. Thank you for your help, Clovermoss. SpectresWrath (talk) 17:33, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. I wish you the best in real life.

If you are interested, I can try helping you with understanding how copyright works. Talking with someone can sometimes help make things more understandable. If you can learn how this works, it's still possible to get unblocked. It's harder the second time around, but it's still possible. Clovermoss (talk) 21:16, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you are interested in trying to figure out how copyright works, a place to start might be to give me an example of what you're talking about in regards to "plot summaries with a ref next to it"? It's possible that that's a copyright violation too and no one noticed it. Or it's an example of paraphrasing. Clovermoss (talk) 21:21, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:YGO5Dslogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:YGO5Dslogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SpectresWrath (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I deserve a second chance because I recognize my mistakes. My issue is that I'm too lost into edit sometimes because I enjoy helping Wikipedia expand its info. I just need to know when to step back and other editors continue where I left off. SpectresWrath (talk) 20:35, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address your sockpuppetry. Yamla (talk) 20:41, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have no excuse for sockpuppetry because my reason explains part of why I did it. If possible, I wish someone would help me when I run into copyright issues so I can avoid trouble. That's why I got block because I don't how to quote certain info and it's hard for me to write certain things in my own words. Yamla, teach me so I can return one day. SpectresWrath (talk) 00:41, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SpectresWrath (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I deserve a second chance because I recognize my mistakes. My issue is that I'm too lost into edit sometimes because I enjoy helping Wikipedia expand its info. I just need to know when to step back and other editors continue where I left off. I have no excuse for sockpuppetry because my reason explains part of why I did it. If possible, I wish someone would help me when I run into copyright issues so I can avoid trouble. That's why I got block because I don't how to quote certain info and it's hard for me to write certain things in my own words. SpectresWrath (talk) 01:08, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I've declined on a few bases. One is the open confidence that you "deserve a second chance" - Wikipedia editing is a privilege, not a right, and one that copyright violations in particular put at risk for all of us. Second is that you say "second chance", but this would be your third chance, no? Why should we trust that this time, you'd be better? Thirdly (and most significantly) is that we aren't able to provide vetting to all your edits or dedicated training. Posessing the self-control to stop and go and ask before venturing into an unclear area is necessary, as is the ability to understand the very clear basics that have been both linked and explained. Nosebagbear (talk) 00:28, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SpectresWrath (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I poured my soul, and I don't know what to say anymore except I'm sorry. What's else do want from me? SpectresWrath (talk) 01:40, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It appears below that you admitted to evading your sock. I would concur with PerryD, if you wish to be unblocked, walk away from Wikipedia for at least 6 months. No sock accounts, no IP editing. Do that and request an unblock, and your unblock request would be considered a lot for seriously I would think. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:50, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Due to a confirmed Sockpuppet Investigation confirming alternative account usage for malicious intent, It is advised you take the WP:Standard offer by refraining from editing for 6 months on ANY account. Promising to avoiding the behavior that lead to the block, and to not give other users any reason to object to your block. Non-Admin Comment PerryPerryD Talk To Me 15:48, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't edit with malicious intent; I continue to add new info like I always do. SpectresWrath (talk) 03:09, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SpectresWrath (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It's been six months and I been following what PerryD told me. I still have nothing else and will leave it to the person who reviews this. SpectresWrath (talk) 00:47, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed block evasion in December as DaElite1. That's it, you are done. You are now considered banned by the community under WP:3X. No admin is free to unilaterally lift your block. Your attempt to deceive us here will count against you in any future WP:UNBAN discussion. Yamla (talk) 18:46, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Banned

This user is banned from editing the English Wikipedia. Administrators, please review the banning policy before unblocking.
(block log · contributions)

Yamla (talk) 18:47, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:One Piece series overview

Template:One Piece series overview has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- Alex_21_TALK 04:38, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Yashahime S2 KV.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Yashahime S2 KV.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:37, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DrStoneStoneWars.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DrStoneStoneWars.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What 46.123.249.67 (talk) 20:40, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Blade of the Immortal (2008 TV series)

The article Blade of the Immortal (2008 TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since 2020

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 14:02, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Blade of the Immortal DVD 1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Blade of the Immortal DVD 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:02, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BeybladeGRVol1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BeybladeGRVol1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:08, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]