Jump to content

User talk:Xerxes1985

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Xerxes931)

Hi 

I saw you made positive contribution on khalji page, but unfortunately the specific user keeps reverting edits. He have same issue with other users too. I hope you can build consensus like saffarid page amonge your known editors and stop him. By protecting the page or something like that. Thank you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:799:5DF:6500:E0FA:69CD:6411:6F80 (talk) 20:46, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Accesscrawl (talk) 16:30, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


April 2020

[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Sart and Kabul Province, you may be blocked from editing. Wario-Man (talk) 04:11, 30 April 2020 (UTC) @Wario-Man: Excuse me? The source used for the quote is simply putting its own interpretation of the word Sart in there .The actual quote from the Baburnamah, a primary source, is distinguishing between Sarts and Tajiks and mentioning them both in different context, the source needs to be get fixed to the Baburnamah itself and the quote accordingly to. --Xerxes931 (talk) 04:37, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is the quote from that source:
In the country of Kābul there are many and various tribes. Its valleys and plains are inhabited by Tūrks, Aimāks, and Arabs. In the city and the greater part of the villages, the population consists of Tājiks.*
Which you falsified it in this edit and removed sourced term "Tajiks" (with a false edit summary, POV). Move your mouse to that blue "*" in the source and its says "Sarts". That's what that cited source says. Do you have a reliable and verifiable source for your claim? --Wario-Man (talk) 04:49, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Wario-Man:Yes the sentence in the Baburnama itself is saying Sart and not Tajik. Babur mentioned the Persian-Speakers in the Ferghana Valley and in the in Kabul as Sarts. However he also mentions "Tajiks" living in the the out and other districts in Kabul, so he distinguishes between Sarts and Tajiks. Here is the actual quote from his own memoirs: "There are many different tribes in the Kabul country ; in its dales and plains are Turks and clansmen and 'Arabs ; in its town and in many villages, Sarts ; out in the districts and also in villages are the Pashai, Paraji, Tajik, Birki and Afghan tribes. In the western mountains are the Hazara and Nikdirl tribes, some of whom speak the Mughuli tongue."(https://www.rarebooksocietyofindia.org/book_archive/196174216674_10154956195296675.pdf Page 207) --Xerxes931 (talk) 08:41, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Rare Book Society of India" is a personal website and does not pass as WP:RS. However, I tried to use Wayback Machine to see if that PDF file is reliable content or not, and WM failed to save/archive too. Download/Save does not work. Find a legit source; e.g. from Google Books, Encyclopedias, or academic sources; something verifiable. --Wario-Man (talk) 05:00, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Wario-Man: Look I have the physical copy of the Baburnama on Farsi at Home and it says Sarts, however I will try to find you something from google books. Nonetheless you can also check the footnotes of the current source which is used in the article source it says “Tajiks*“ When you click on the star it tells you itself Sarts. Edit here you go, page 128: https://books.google.de/books?redir_esc=y&id=VW2HJL689wgC&q=Tajik#v=snippet&q=Tajik&f=false Sart as in Persian-speaker, Tajik as in a ethnicity inhabiting some outer districts of Kabul and villages --Xerxes931 (talk) 13:56, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

[edit]

I'm writing this post to extend my gratitude to you for improving the quality of pages related to Afghanistan. I recently began editing WP and came across many of your valuable contributions to the articles on WP. I hope you continue with your valuable contributions

Regards An IP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 43.245.8.21 (talk) 18:39, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

43.245.8.21 Thank you so much! I always try my best to add sourced and valuable information, I will definitely try to continue that. Best regards --Xerxes931 (talk) 19:35, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ghormach District, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aimaq (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:45, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

[edit]

Can you please head over to this page https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Casperti and help resolve the issue & provide your insights. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.109.40.107 (talk) 04:15, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tajiks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Turkic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dari and Tajik language

[edit]
  • Don't add your POV and unsourced stuff to articles like what you did here.[1] Even if you have some reliable sources for your claims, such edits do not belong to the intro or first paragraph of lead section. They should be discussed/explained after the intro or in the related sections.
  • Take your concerns to the talk page.[2] Open a related section there. e.g. if you think the citation is unreliable[3], you should discuss it or remove the whole stuff (both sourced text + the source itself). --Wario-Man (talk) 14:25, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Wario-Man Okay I will just remove the sourced text and the source itself, as the statement from the source as a whole is too controversial. Regarding the part with Tajik: The language was called Farsi until the Soviet period, thus in the context of being used for the Farsi dialect up there, its a political term invented by the Soviets. Source: http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/tajik-ii-tajiki-persian "Persian speakers of the region came to be called Tajiks, in contradistinction to Turks, but their language was still called fārsi ‘Persian’ until the Soviet period. [...] in accordance with Soviet nationalities policy, an ethnic Tajik Soviet republic was established, and a literary language called “Tajik” was engineered on a vernacular base close to the Uzbekized spoken Persian of Bukhara and Samarqand" --Xerxes931 (talk) 14:45, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Takhar Province

[edit]

Hello, I saw you remove my edits on takhar province regarding the ethnic makeup. Look at the original sources put there, they are either random or dont work. Im myself from afghanistan and have spend several years in takhar, baghlan, kunduz, panjshir,parwan, samangan, balkh, herat, kabul, farah, nimruz, bamiyan, jalalabad, kapisa, ghazni and logar province. It is hard to get any sources on the ethnic makeup of afghanistan, however i am putting these numbers from my own experience. Takhar is a tajik majority (between 70-90%) but on the wikipedia page uzbeks are shown as a majority, this is ubsurd and false (it seems it was either put originally by uzbek or pashtun nationalist). hope you have understood. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1DHNK1 (talk • contribs) 10:33, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I understand your issue, there was never a proper census in Afghanistan. However that applies also to you adding numbers there because you don’t have a source for them either. I agree with Takhar, it’s obviously majority Tajik. You can write something like “the biggest part of the population is Tajik “ or “the majority of the population is Tajik” but don’t put any numbers in there since we don’t have any sources. For Takhar I will just let this be an exceptional case, because the source which was previously added for Uzbeks being the majority was only about one district and not all of Takhar, for the others please don’t add anything else, you can remove numbers which seem “absurd” or wrong to you and don’t have a source and replace them by just naming the ethnicity’s living there, but don’t add any numbers to them as your personal experience doesn’t count as a source, I am sorry. Xerxes931 (talk) 12:47, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Ill keep that in mind for the future — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1DHNK1 (talk • contribs) 02:16, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Meaning of the word Kanake

[edit]

Hello there. I see you have changed my edit regarding the word "Kanake". Do you have any credible links to back up the change you made. The word Kanake refers to people from mainly Turkey (or other non Christen, ethnic groups from mostly Asia minor) M.BUTOI 20:20, 28 July 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mario Butoi (talk • contribs)

Appreciation post

[edit]

I've been reading some of the WP articles and have found your contributions to some of these articles as highly constructive and neutral such as the edits made by you to this page Zamindawar, and others. I am writing this post to appreciate your efforts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.50.95.57 (talk) 09:52, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hindu Kush talk

[edit]

Under the comments section, Zakaria1978 added his "oppose." As his view was listed in the body, and he added his "vote" at the bottom, i went ahead and included my "vote" too. You should consider doing the same. Alishernavoi (talk) 23:29, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User: Alishernavoi I also saw that, does he expect it to make his vote count double or something ? I mean we can still see his username, but sure I can do it too if you want me to Xerxes931 (talk) 11:55, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Map of Central Asia

[edit]

Your new version is some kind of POV-pushing and it's unnecessary when there are already other maps that include Afghanistan. When did you get consensus for your new revision?! --Wario-Man (talk) 06:17, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wario-Man, my map is not POV pushing as there are countless of sources including Afghanistan in Central Asia, however it’s not included in every definition and also considered a link between Central and South Asia, hence why it’s done in a lighter colour. What do you think about opening an RFC regarding the topic?

Best regards Xerxes931 (talk) 11:29, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your map is your desired revision without getting any consensus. It is your POV more or less. Some points:
  • We use common stuff (terms, words, definitions, and etc). Afghanistan does not fit in the common definition of Central Asia.
  • Afghanistan is already discussed here plus some relevant maps.
  • Other articles about regions of Asia follow the same format and style; e.g. South Asia.
  • You can open a discussion about your concerns on talk page BUT you need providing strong rationale rationale and sources. --Wario-Man (talk) 04:23, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank your for the message

[edit]

Hello Xerxes,

Thank you for checking up with me, I am doing fine. Hope your free days and independence Day went well. I have messaged/email ed you. I do not know whether it worked --Casperti (talk) 13:13, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indian subcontinent

[edit]

I have added some stuff on the boundaries of the region, and on Afghanistan too. Please check. It is still work in progress. I have used your link. But have not found anything clear enough to tell that Afghanistan is on the other side of Hindu Kush, and hence beyond that boundary. Aditya(talk • contribs) 10:42, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Aditya thanks for letting me know, the information added is fine but I would remove Afghanistan and Myanmar from the lede, you already explained their status very well in the geopolitical section. --Xerxes931 (talk) 11:02, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pashtuns

[edit]

Hello. You have twice removed sourced information ~ and the sources ~ from this article. Please do not do so again. If you want to dispute what is clearly sourced, please do so on the talk page, where the community can take note of your concern and give it timely and thoughtful evaluation. Thank you, happy days, LindsayHello 17:34, 9 September 2020 (UTC) User: LindsayH Hello, sure we can talk about it on the talk page, have you read through the sources ? They state that the people are Punjabi’s and not Pashtuns, just living with them together in the same area, I will open a talk soon.--Xerxes931 (talk) 19:44, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

El_C 19:55, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Khalji dynasty

[edit]

Hi. 

As you have seen this user is not cooperating and is POV and is continuously involved in edit war. I think the only way is to ask for support from wikipedia to  Protect the page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.211.44.102 (talk) 08:53, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply] 



HI AGAIN.

 Sorry to bother you again but this is urgent and necessary. I think Khalji dynasty page needs your urgent attention. You really have to help other editors thier and do something about it. I think your edits were very accurate but unfortunately  he is undoing it. I think you should re-edit it and with help from others protect the page.Hope you do something abouyt it soon. Thank you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.211.19.90 (talk) 11:27, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Khalji dynasty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Turkic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:39, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

[edit]

There is occasional vandalism in (list of pashtun empires page) and also i tried my best to "put back" khalji dynasty in (pashtun template) some time ago but the user keeps deleting it. Can you protect those pages too? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.211.44.191 (talk) 21:51, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply] 

Hi again.
Can you also see Afghanistan page. In the Afghan name origin section someone has deleted the (very important) "Abgan" reference of shapur 1 to a tribe in the east( probably during kushan rule.). Can you re-edit it. thank you.
talk Can you send a diff? Which page are you specifically referring to? Thanks Xerxes931 (talk) 19:51, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afghanistan

Etymology section. thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.211.44.191 (talk) 20:42, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

talk Who removed it and when ? Post a link of the edit. Xerxes931 (talk) 23:36, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply] 

Sorry i couldnt find it either. Maybe i mistook for another article, but you can go ahead and add it if you deem important. Thank you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.211.44.191 (talk) 12:44, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And there have been vandalism here, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Pashtun_empires_and_dynasties — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.211.44.191 (talk) 13:57, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Hindu Shahi
added a link pointing to Bactrian
Turk Shahis
added a link pointing to Bactrian

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Telpek

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Telpek requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://business.com.tm/post/4370/traditional-telpek-still-popular-among-turkmens. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:54, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ghurid dynasty

[edit]

I think you (with support of other editors) should edit the ghurid dynasty origin page. It is extremely one sided and the tone is very un-wikipedia. The article ignores major sources and primary sources too like firishta etc. You sould build consensus and do something about it. Thank you.

It might be one sided regarding the claim of it being a Tajik dynasty but it’s not regarding them being Pashtuns, as we don’t have prove for that, it’s mostly only Pashtun genealogy’s stating them to be Pashtuns, as well as some scholars however there is no evidence for it.The Shansabanis were a Ghurid tribe, If you’re gonna argue that they were Pashtun then you’d have to argue for all Ghorids being Pashtun, There’s no evidence for that. Xerxes931 (talk) 15:26, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
you are right thats all i wanted to say that both point of views should equally be presented. Now the tone is very un-wikipedia and one sided.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.211.44.191 (talk) 16:02, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Season's Greetings

[edit]
Season's Greetings
Wishing you a Happy Holiday Season, and a beautiful and productive New Year! पाटलिपुत्र Pat (talk) 16:22, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much, wish you a marry Christmas and a Happy new year as well, stay the way you are, from the perspective of an Afghan your the best thing that could happen on Wikipedia! --Xerxes931 (talk) 21:37, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Sistan into Sistani Persians. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 12:48, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Afghan cameleers in Australia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NWFP.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ghor province

[edit]

Do not undo my work on the basis of POV, here is the link to what i based my information of (https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-n4X9BrFFCsU/W_zl5kBsF7I/AAAAAAAAAWQ/YnO32b6g4Vw6YW-aPtmCELjcAaDB61m-ACLcBGAs/s1600/Ghor%2BSettlement%2BMap.png), regarding takhar province u removed my edits becuase of lack of reliable source, fair enough. But the older numbers also dont have any reliable source so on what basis are they good to stay up. as we know in afghanistan we never had any censuses so nothing can be classified as "reliable source" all are estimates etc. And no I was not in takhar for a holiday, I was a soldier for shuroi nazar in the early 90s all the way till 2001, i know the northern regions of afghanistan like the palm of my hands. 1DHNK1 (talk) 11:15, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

pashtun empires

[edit]

Hi i think you need to take a look in here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Pashtun_empires_and_dynasties They have deleted khalji dynasty. I think you can add dynasties (with necessary explanation) like sayed dynasty too. And you can add it on template too because the user have added template in page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.211.44.191 (talk) 10:51, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply] 

Hi
I was just wondering if you could take a look on pashtun empires page, and there have been vandalisem in Khalji dynasty page, the user kami have changed it to "wrongly" again. thank you.

Warning

[edit]

Hi Xerxes931. This was unfortunately a violation of WP:OR and WP:RS. You can't just add self-formulated theories just because you think its true; Wikipedia is written using reliable sources. And no, YouTube is not a reliable source per the guidelines. - LouisAragon (talk) 09:44, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Same thing here.[4] If you want to add Afghanistan, you need to find a proper source that says so. Thanks, - LouisAragon (talk) 09:45, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello User:LouisAragon, I know that YouTube isn’t a reliable source, however it should do its job if you want demonstrate something existing in a certain part of the world, the Chapi circle dances in Eastern Iran certainly have variations which are pretty much identical to Attan(no this is not WP:OR, it’s common sense from looking at the dances). So I would like to reinstall the picture of Southern Khorasanis performing the Chapi dance. Furthermore the part about it being a Zoroastrian or old pagan practice was there prior to my edits as well, I just tried to rephrase it better( the part about it being likely due to similar dances in Eastern Iran was WP:OR I agree with that and I would leave that out this time) I am going to need my time to find sources, but once I have them I will reinstall most of the content if it’s in line with the sources.

Kind regards --Xerxes931 (talk) 13:43, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • "I know that YouTube isn’t a reliable source, however it should do its job if you want demonstrate something existing in a certain part of the world (...)"
No, I'm telling you again, YouTube can't be used as a source per WP:RSP.
  • " (...)no this is not WP:OR, it’s common sense from looking at the dances"
"Common sense" is not an argument to replace WP:RS. What you did was WP:OR pushing in every sense of the word.
Just find proper sources for the material you add next time, and nobody will object. Thanks, - LouisAragon (talk) 20:47, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
LouisAragon Okay, thanks for making this clear, I will take it into account from now on and not use Youtube anymore. --Xerxes931 (talk) 21:06, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting article expansion help

[edit]

Greetings


Requesting you to visit articles Islamic advice literature and Draft:Aurats (word) and please do expand them if find yourself interested.


Thanks and warm regards

Bookku (talk) 05:26, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Afghanistan Star
Grān Xerxes931, thank you for your contributions to the Pre-Islamic Period of Pashtun religions.Very insightful sources provided! You are making a difference in spreading information about Pashtun kaltoor! PashtoPromoter (talk) 06:06, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have changed the location from "Pashtun areas" to "Eastern Afghanistan and Gandhara". I hope we can put this disagreement behind us and work together for improving information on Pashtuns on Wikipedia PashtoPromoter (talk) 17:33, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pashtuns, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bactrian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Khalji dynasty

[edit]

Hi, sorry for being persistent but i just think it is important to remind you. There have been vandalism in Khalji dynasty page by the previous blocked user. He have done the same edits (adding wrongly) from which he was blocked by your request.It is there for a week or so. Hope you revert it soon enough. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.211.44.191 (talk) 12:22, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply] 

There have been removal of your edits in khalji dynasty.

Khizr khan

[edit]

Hi Sorry but this is urgent. In https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khizr_Khan page (Ali banu sistani) is deleting the Afghan mention of Muntakhab-al-Lubab, and instead write it arab, where the book clearly mentions him Afghan as you already know. I tried to revert him a few times but he is persistent. can you help please. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.211.44.191 (talk) 19:37, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply] 

Hi again. The user have multiple accounts . He reverts me each time with a different account. Now i cant revert more. you for sure might know how to deal with situation. thank you

Hello

Hope you are doing well. I know i have mentioned it before but can you please fix the vandalism in Khizr khan page. It have been there for quite some tome now.

Thank in advance. Have a good day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.211.44.191 (talk) 16:31, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:Khwarazmian dynasty § Splitting proposal

[edit]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Khwarazmian dynasty § Splitting proposal. VisioncurveTimendi causa est nescire 06:47, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Khalji dynasty

[edit]

you are accusing me of removing sourced content, but this whole sentence was written by me a few months ago and I had given my sources back then. But my sourced content were removed by another editor using sources which barely have anything to do with the topic of the sentence. I could not correct it again because the page was locked for a few months (because there was an edit conflict between some others in a different section) Stop removing my source this time. Mydust (talk) 22:17, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1. Use the talk page of the article to discuss that, not my talk page. 2. The author is not a reliable source, hence why it was removed, since the text there is contradictory to the whole article.

Cheers Xerxes1985 (talk) 09:32, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have put my objections on the talk page yesterday. If you do not respond on the page I will be changing the edit again, thanks. Mydust (talk) 13:38, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
how does it contradict the rest of the article? explain Mydust (talk) 14:46, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
HI

I think you need to ask for protection in khalji page, there is continuous vandalism.

sayed dynasty.

[edit]

Hi. The very user that have been edit Waring with you on khalji page have vandalised sayed dynasty origin section. I with another contributer have corrected the khizer khan page origin. Can you fix sayed dynasty origin according to khizr khan page. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.211.44.191 (talk) 12:16, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply] 


The same user is keeping deleting the mention of Afghan in every article. now he deleted afghan in the army of the mughul empire which was there for years.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Army_of_the_Mughal_Empire. You should realy fix them all and report him. 

Hi

i REALLY need your help in sayed dynasty. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.211.44.191 (talk) 14:50, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kandahari cap moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Kandahari cap, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 07:06, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Recent vandalism's and POVs

[edit]

Hi. I know that you are currently in active but there have been many obvious pov pushing in both Khalji dynasty and sayed dynasty (including khizr khans article). You can ask for protection in khalji dynasty (as there have been many pov pushing) and i think it is the same user (star dust) who uses multiple accounts. You can see my sources (and obvious reasons) in sayed and khizr khan page, and the very obvious thing that why mention of Afghan is very important. I presented both primary and secondary sources in the form of famous books, and "stressed" the fact that there is (not) enough literature about sayeds (which makes my sources even more important) but the user (history of iran) picked obvious sides and warned me of further edits which is totally against wiki rules. I hope you take some time to see through and involve third parties in this as well. thank you!

User: 84.211.44.191 Thanks for notifying me about the Khalji article, that was indeed borderline vandalism, if not vandalism itself. I am currently very inactive but always feel free to notify me about things like that. I am not well versed on the Sayed dynasty issue to make a statement, but what I would recommend you is to first create a proper account for yourself and after that just try to communicate with the other editors on the talk page in peace instead of edit warring, also make sure to always sign your comments at the end by putting four ~ in a row after your comment. Kind regards Xerxes1985 (talk) 21:41, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Will try to create an account.

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

[edit]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Danre98(talk^contribs) 01:10, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Xerxes1985, while you are participating at DRN, could you please keep your comments in your own section? Whenever you edit that page, you'll see the edit notice at the top says to "Edit only in your own section". You could move your recent comment into your own section, and add a brief note at the beginning letting everyone know the comment is in response to the other editor's summary. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 19:41, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

[edit]

You have to see this and involve the third party (Wikipedia) . I know you said you don't know much about sayed dynasty,(so doesn't he!).

Hi. I think we have solved the problem here. Now we have 3 sources.

"1-the primary source in the form of book (muntakhabul- lubab).

https://archive.org/details/cu31924073036778/page/n415/mode/2up

2- The (old) secondary source in the form of book (The History of India, as Told by Its Own Historians: The Muhammadan Period)

https://books.google.no/books?id=P_yZMy1fxsUC&pg=PA404&lpg=PA404&dq=he+khizr+khan+was+by+origin+and+by+names+of+his+ancestors+afghan&source=bl&ots=vgUMvivFbn&


And now the 3- secondary source in the form of book(African Elites in India: Habshi Amarat). Very recent, Published in 2006.(Kenneth X. Robbins, ‎John McLeod)

https://books.google.no/books?id=4xduAAAAMAAJ&q=african+elites+in+india+book&dq=african+elites+in+india+book&hl=en&sa=X&redir_esc=y

- Book is not open but as you told me i have copied the sentence for you..

"There are suggestions that Mubarak Shah was an Afghan and related to Khizr Khan Sayyid , the Afghan sultan of Delhi.."

Now i think we have enough material to mention Afghan in the origins. I really hope you go forward and edit it the way you think is appropriate. Thank you. " 

He clearly is not honest! i tried everything but he is biased. Also if you don't want to intervene can you help me to involve wikipedia and how?84.211.44.191 (talk) 22:42, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Season's Greetings

[edit]
Season's Greetings
Hi Xerxes1985! Wishing you a Happy Holiday Season, and a beautiful and productive New Year!

पाटलिपुत्र Pat (talk) 13:13, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kandahari cap

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Xerxes1985. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kandahari cap, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kandahari cap

[edit]

Hello, Xerxes1985. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kandahari cap".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 07:18, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Xerxes1985&oldid=1139962554"