User talk:DoubleGrazing

Welcome to my talk page!

Hello! Please leave a new message. I will respond to your message as soon as possible. Thanks and happy editing!

Also take care of the following points:

If I left you a message; please answer on your talk page, using {{ping|Username}}, {{reply to|Username}} or {{u|Username}} in your response, or add {{talkback|Username}} or {{whisperback|Username}} to my talk page. And if you leave me a message; I will answer on my talk page, using {{ping|Username}} or {{u|Username}} in my response, or add {{talkback|Username}} or {{whisperback|Username}} to your talk page.
Please post your new topic at the bottom of this page or at the bottom of the respective section, and use a new ==Descriptive heading== for new topics.
Indent your comment when replying by using an appropriate number of colons ":"
Sign and date your entry by inserting four tildes "~~~~" at the end of your message.
I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your talk page (or the article talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or specifically let me know where you'd prefer the reply.
Avoid personal attacks, do not troll or use this page as a chat room.
Please, always assume good faith.
If the topic is something personal, please email me and leave {{ygm}} on my talk page.
And if you are impressed by my contributions, consider giving WikiLove.

⇒Start a new topic⇐

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41, 42, 43

Scam warning!

There is a scam underway, targeting editors who attempt to publish Wikipedia article(s); see WP:SCAM for more information. If you have been approached by someone offering to create, accept or otherwise help publish an article in exchange for a payment, please e-mail the details to paid-en-wp@wikipedia.org. This may help others in a similar situation to avoid becoming victims of this vile scam.
PS: If that someone claims to be me, they emphatically are not!

If I declined your draft at AfC, and you came to ask me to re-review it, please don't (unless I expressly said you could) – I feel it's fairer to the other drafts that yours goes back to the pool... and probably also fairer to your draft that someone else reviews it next. (And if you just came to tell me you've made changes, that's great, but no need to inform me.)

If you still want to leave me a message about a draft or article, I'd appreciate if you could please link to the page in question, so I don't have to go hunting for it. Ta.

Voltol

Dear DoubleGrazer, thanks for your review, I'm a bit confused as all the sources are from the original GERMAN article about VOLTOL https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voltol, I have not added one single thing to all the text, just translated it. I will review my source codes, cause maybe there is some problem with coding. Kind regards, Ogv (talk) 11:04, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ogv: yes, I also discovered that German original; I've left a comment on the draft regarding that.

As for your point about the sources, each different language version of Wikipedia is a completely separate project with their own rules and requirements. What is acceptable on one version may not be acceptable on another. I think I'm right in saying that the English-language version has the strictest requirements in what comes to referencing and notability. It therefore often happens that when translating from another language version, the translation may not be accepted here unless the sources are improved. (And sometimes the sources cannot be improved, if better sources simply don't exist, but let's hope that isn't the case here.)

Best, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:09, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazingOK, thank you for your comments, will review the page over the weekend and save it again once I double-checked all this. Appreciate your effort. Kind regards Ogv (talk) 11:12, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now you have put the sandals on

It may be interesting for you to reflect on what has changed since they were issued. How does what you do here now differ from before? Are any relationships here changed? Do folk treat you differently in the way they approach you? All that sort of stuff ought to be really interesting 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:48, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Timtrent: not to sound over-dramatic, but it feels a bit like I've left my home town which I knew and where I was comfortable, and moved to the city where I know nothing, can't find my way around, and have to constantly be on my guard (and try not to look like the country bumpkin that I really am!). I double- and triple-check everything before carrying out any admin tasks to make sure I've got them right, and often just back off rather than risking a whoopsie. Even at AfC I find I'm more cautious than before, and therefore end up doing less.

So far I don't think I've poked anyone in the eye with my mop, but even so I'm half-expecting to get an ANI notice on my talk page at any moment. Maybe I'll learn to relax with time as I gain more confidence.

Other than that, I wouldn't say things have changed much. Thanks for asking. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:32, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I had a feeling you might start as a stranger in a strange land. I think everyone does. The who recognise that thrive, those who do not recognise it make a pest of themselves.

It's a strange role that people arrive in knowing nothing, but with everything expected of them.

Never forget that the mop can stay in the cleaning cupboard unless needed. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:46, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Timtrent "It's a strange role that people arrive in knowing nothing, but with everything expected of them." This is so true. I thought something similar myself, how odd it is that you're given the key to the cleaning cupboard, and basically left to figure out on your own what to do with all the gear. If there is a training or mentoring scheme of some sort, I've not come across it (mind you, haven't looked, either); and if there isn't, then there probably ought to be.

And now I'm off for a sip of that bleach, it says it's lemon-flavoured! The brand has a cool 'Skull & Crossbones' logo, too. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:48, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think the mop's main use is for pushing the bucket across the floor, There's bleach? No-one ever said! I must apply forthwith, or maybe fifthwith. Is Mango Iced Tea flavour available? I think I amay be clean round the bend.

That there is no induction at all is both surprising and unsurprising. Can you imagine the fuss if someone tried to create one? We'd get five competing ones, and at least one creator would be permabanned. It just needs "Janet and John Learn to be Wikipedia Administrators" 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:09, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question on my declined Draft:BlobCat

Hey, sorry if this is a very basic question as I'm very new to this. I already kind of expected the article to be declined, but I want to know how I can fix that - yes, my main sources are the game developers' social media presences, but there isn't really any other way to track the development of the game over the years as this was their main outlet. Many thanks for your fast review! :) Echo4482 (talk) 16:34, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Jairam Kumar Mahato

Sarim Wani has asked for a deletion review of Jairam Kumar Mahato. Because you speedily deleted the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.

Should've notified you on the first pass, sorry; I only checked Hey man he's josh's talk page, and didn't think to look for a G4 that soon after the afd. —Cryptic 20:42, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For everyone who has not heard my stance here it is in plain light

I am requesting a review of the deletion of the article "Jairam Kumar Mahato" based on new evidence and arguments not discussed in the original deletion discussion.

Jairam Kumar Mahato was responsible for launching a notable movement in Jharkhand, India. Specifically, his protests led to changes in the recognition of regional languages, where languages such as Bhojpuri, Magahi, and Angika were included in the list of regional languages for state-level examinations in 11 districts. He strongly advocated for promoting local languages and demanded that jobs in the state be reserved for Jharkhand natives, preventing individuals from other states from gaining these opportunities.

This qualifies him under Wikipedia's notability guideline for people as:

1. **Biography**: "The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in a specific field."

2. **Politicians and Judges**: "Major local political figures who have received significant press coverage."

Additionally, he does not fall under "People notable for only one event," as his actions and media coverage span multiple related events (2 to be exact), thus meeting the threshold for separate documentation.

https://jlkmparty.org/ https://scroll.in/article/1075548/in-jharkhand-a-young-leaders-growing-popularity-leaves-established-parties-worried https://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2022/Feb/19/jharkhand-withdraws-bhojpuri-maghi-as-regional-languages-from-dhanbad-bokaro-amid-protests-2421373.html https://www.newslaundry.com/2024/11/14/why-is-jharkhands-youth-rallying-behind-this-30-year-old-political-outsider

Please understand that this user stands under 2 notability fields and a wining of an election is not mandatory for the candidate to be listed on wiki that's why I understand zero things which are listed under this please tell me if I am not getting something which I have to get

thanks :) Sarim Wani (talk) 13:22, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ignore thought this was the deletion disscussion Sarim Wani (talk) 13:36, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Realqueenb (02:57, 18 November 2024)

Hello! I am a freelance marketer; and I have three clients who want to be added to Wikipedia - how do I add their information? Thank you. --Realqueenb (talk) 02:57, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Realqueenb: first, carefully read WP:PAID, which provides information on paid editing and how to manage your conflict of interest. Also, make the necessary paid-editing disclosure(s) as instructed there.

Then, and only then, you can start creating drafts on these subjects. You will find pretty much everything you need for that at WP:your first article.

HTH, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:46, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Derix Glasstudios

Hi, you reviewed my article for Derix Glasstudios. You said I don't have enough reliable sources. But I conntected the following:

GLASSLINE (2018-09-24). "Symbol of life - the Glass Tower of Omaha". www.glassline.de. Retrieved 2023-09-18.

Glasstudios, Derix (2018-04-10). "Anniversary of a very special project". Derix Glasstudios. Retrieved 2023-08-24.[non-primary source needed]

Germany, programm ARD de-ARD Play-Out-Center Potsdam, Potsdam. "Vorsicht zerbrechlich! - Glaskunst aus Taunusstein". programm.ARD.de. Retrieved 2023-08-24.

"El Paso Museum of History". www.charlotteannpaul.com. Retrieved 2023-08-24.

"Juxtapoz Magazine - James Earley & Derix Glasstudios Collaboration Fusing Graffiti and Stained Glass". www.juxtapoz.com. Retrieved 2023-08-24.

I mean what elese then the biggest German Newspaper (bild) and the public broadcasting (ard) can I deliver? Thanks for your help! SimonMüller87 (talk) 15:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @SimonMüller87,

We normally require three secondary sources that clearly meet the WP:GNG standard. The Bild article is one. The ARD programme could be another, but when I click on the link I just get today's broadcast schedule. And we still need one more, or two more if the ARD one can't be made to work.

HTH, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mqdoc Xqve

I thought that was his stage name. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure you're right, @Deepfriedokra. My thinking was that their edits were pure self-promo. Did I make a mistake in how I blocked them (with WP:SUPG)? Or are you saying I shouldn't have blocked at all? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 20:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't think it's a user name violation. Some might not like the idea of a minimal warning block. I've made such blocks in the past. They do act as if their only purpose is self promotion. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe a level four warning to avoid biteness. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra: roger wilco. Appreciate the steer. Ta, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 20:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

always a pleasure. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:02, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:John Rotellini

Hi there! Thank you so much for the feedback on my submission. I'm new to some of the editing and am struggling to figure out why my citations are showing up as in line links. When I go into the editor, each citation is showing as the long-form citation but, when opening in the READ mode, they're showing up as links. Forgive me if I am being REALLY DENSE here but I swear I'm inputting these in the right format but am not getting the right result. Any advice? I thank you for your time, patience and kindness. Just wanting to learn to do this right and am currently very confused.

Thank you. added by Jojohot1 (talk •

Hi @Jojohot1: no problem, happy to help; it's luckily a very simple fix. The {{cite web}} template is the correct one to use, but it needs to be wrapped inside <ref> tags. So for example, if you're citing the BBC News website, the full citation would be

<ref>{{cite web |title=Home - BBC News |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news}}</ref>

That way it's treated as an inline citation rather than an inline external link, and instead of displaying the web page title there in the body text, it only shows a small superscript number, which refers to the numbered footnotes which will appear on the bottom of the page.

See if that works, and shout back if it doesn't. :) Best, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:29, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]