Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
Please do not cite social media or other user-generated sources, they are not considered reliable.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BlobCat and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Echo4482!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:01, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
I am not convinced that Ntower is a reliable source. It's not on WP:VG/S, and seems to be written by fans on a freelance basis rather than having an official staff. Only two reliably sourced reviews doesn't meet the threshold for video game notability. It's my opinion this is one of those "close, but no cigar" situations.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BlobCat and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hey, thank you for the quick review! I obviously get your criticism, but I've got a few corrections regarding ntower - here's a translated quote from the site's article on the German Wikipedia:
Founder, managing director and publisher is Holger Wettstein, the editorial team of around twenty people is headed by Dennis Meppiel and Krispin Berndt. The editorial team covers the German-speaking area and consists of more than 20 people.
It is also clearly established as an independent magazine in the second paragraph. I personally would definitely see it as a trustworthy source, especially in the German-speaking sphere where the game was discussed the most.
