Jump to content

Talk:Jeffrey Epstein

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Original police report was claimed to be 30 people, not 5, not 34, not 36

[edit]

The record is online but is mentioned several times here along with one person who broke down and told interrogator what they wanted.

https://www.insider.com/ghislaine-maxwell-testimony-jeffrey-epstein-released-2020-10?back=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Fsearch%3Fclient%3Dsafari%26as_qdr%3Dall%26as_occt%3Dany%26safe%3Dactive%26as_q%3DEpstein+trial+testimony%26channel%3Daplab%26source%3Da-app1%26hl%3Den

[edit]

Ronan Farrow in his 2019 book, Catch & Kill, notes Dylan Howard of the National Enquirer contacted Jane Does’ attorney, Lisa Bloom, to pressure Jane Doe to drop the case against Trump BEFORE THE 2016 ELECTION. Farrow noted National Enquirer was working with Trump to kill any derogatory stories. The Doe case was, in fact, dropped on 4 Nov 2016. Ms. Bloom, Does’ attorney, denies any hush money was paid, or any agreement reached with National Enquirer claiming Ms. Doe withdrew complaint due to threats. These threats would be as effective as the original threats made in 1994 when she was 13 years old as stated in affidavit. Ms. Bloom may not have been the attorney to present a hush money deal. Mr. Trump had several lawyers working on hiding his sexual life from the voters in 2016. Steve Bannon stated in book, Fire & Fury by Michael Wolff, that lawyer Mark Kasowitz “took care of about 100 women during 2016.” The Stormy Daniels/Karen McDougal hush money payments were not disclosed til after the election in 2017. Doe had two witnesses: Joan and Tiffany Doe, who might also have been threatened/paid. Television media did not broadcast the Jane Doe case. A few newspapers mentioned it—notably the Huffington Post in 2016. Then, in 2024, NY’s Alvin Bragg charges Trump with falsifying documents to hide derogatory information from the voters to win election. During that trial, Dylan Howard and David Pecker of the National Enquirer confirm Ronan Farrow’s allegation and testify under oath about their 2015 agreement with Trump to kill such stories. NY trial was limited to the killing of Stormy Daniels/Karen McDougal hush money. FAILED to mention the SUCCESSFUL killing of this story of a tag-team rape of a 13 year old by Trump/Epstein in 1994. Trump, however, was not the only billionaire to be accused of raping 13 year old at Epstein’s NY mansion. Billionaire Leon Black would also be so accused. And, like Doe’s case, would discredit the victim and get the case dropped (or settled secretly). However, Black did pay a $62.5M settlement to not be charged with any sexual crimes at Epstein’s Virgin Islands’ mansion. Epstein’s estate refused to pay any penalty on behalf of Leon Black. Brainy86 (talk) 04:11, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal Life Section Bias - Clinton versus Trump

[edit]

At the end of the 8th paragraph, it delves into Trump's description of his negative associations with Epstein. This is clearly written in a biased tone, as you can easily compare the apologetic nature of how Clinton's interactions with him are written. A good example of this is where the article states that rumors could not be confirmed, with a reference to a tweet of what the victim's representation said. The problem is that the way the sentence is written contradicts what the tweet says in its assertion of veracity. The tweeter literally precedes his retelling with "I think...", as in "I think [I remember it being]". Clearly (and to no one's surprise) there is the typical bias going on here that pervades modern media.

It needs to be re-written with the same tone and eye for both (and any other cases for that matter), not with a tone and verbiage that gives the benefit of the doubt to a person who's a member of a certain political party. 108.160.66.135 (talk) 16:26, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]