User talk:Kent Bargo

Welcome!

Hello, Kent Bargo! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Cassiopeia(talk) 09:11, 12 June 2020 (UTC) Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

UFC 251

Hi Kent Bargo, Greetings. Pls note no wikilink on section title. Thank you. Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:38, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

@Cassiopeia:, FIGHT ISLAND IS NOT A ARENAKent Bargo (talk) 06:30, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi Kent Bargo, I didnt revert your fight Island edit. Secondly, you need to ping the editor who you send the message to, so they could receive a message - pls see WP:Ping and see what I have done on your message to me above. Pls read Help:Wikitext for some fundamental wikimarkup and read the topic on the welcome message which I sent you above. Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:10, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Kent Bargo, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Kent Bargo! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

UFC on ESPN: Blaydes vs. Volkov

Hi Kent Bargo, Greetings. I have reverted your edit as the method on the fight table is as per Sherdog.com based on WP:MMA guidlines. Stay safe and thank you Cassiopeia^(talk)

MMA related articles

Hi Kent Bargo, Greetings. Since you have edited a number of pages of MMA related articles in Wikipedia, pls see the below.

1. Pls visit Wikipedia:WikiProject Mixed martial arts and read through the MMA Wikipedia guidelines.
2. When a bout is announced which stating "finalizing, in work, rumors, verbally agreed,  in the press, this means the bout is not official yet. Wait until it official before place it under the "Announced bouts" section of the event page.
3. When a bout is announced in the press, editors put the match up in the  "Announced bouts" section (inline citation is needed)
4. When UFC.com / its local web site (pls check the reference beneath the fight card table in the Wikipedia page), the editors would remove the bout in the "Announced bouts" and place it in the "fight card" section.
5. When a fighter pulls from a fight (due to injury/or by UFC/ visa issues and etc), we placed the info in the "Background section" (inline citation needed) and remove the injured fighter name and put "TBD".
6. When a injured fighter has been replaced, editor put the info in the background section (with inline citation). If the new match up has not been shown in the UFC.com fight card, then we will removed the match up from the fight card and place it back to "Announced section". If the match up already shown in the UFC.com then jut put the replacement fighter in the fight card section.
7. When the event named has been announced (such as UFC Fight Night: dos Santos vs. Tuivasa) then we place the info in the background section (with inline citation). If UFC.com has shown the event names (Fight Night events or UFC on ESPN) such as UFC Fight Night: Cowboy vs. Medeiros or UFC on ESPN: Reyes vs. Weidman, then editor would move the article and article talk page name accordingly accept the flagship event such as UFC 187, UFC 242 and etc.
8. No colour box in the fighter's page infobox at event fight card page. No title eliminator in the fight card or body text in fighter page or event page. No (c) - champion on the event fight card unless the fighter is the current champion of the weight division.
9. "method" in the fight table is as per Sherdog.com as per WP:MMA guideline and please do not interpret the method yourself even if the method is incorrect as Wikipedia is all about WP:verification and not the true.
10. Info box as per Sherdog. No other nick names or else we would have many nicknames pop up every time there is a internet meme.
11. Reach as per UFC.com as Sherdog dont have the info. Pls provide inline citation.
12. Stand - need to provide inline citation. IF you can find source to support it, leave it blank
13. Style - "The style parameter should only be used in MMA fighters that have participated professionally or in international competitions in other combat sports (i.e. boxing or kickboxing) and who are notable in said sports and deserve an article for their merits in these other sports (i.e. Antônio Rogério Nogueira, Alistair Overeem). It is suggested to MMA editors that they actively remove the style parameter in infoboxes of MMA fighters that do not meet these criteria." Leave style for modern mma fighter as they have to train several combat disciplines.
14. No Flag icon on info box or fight table.
15. Info could be obtain from Sherdog on Info box - need to support by sources such as teachers, belts, notable relatives, university, occupation outside fighting career and etc.
16. Pls read referencing to understand about referencing and how to provide inline citation.
17. Leave a brief edit summary before saving you edit, so other editors know the nature of your edit for Wikipedia is the collaboration work from many editors.
18. To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Ping|Cassiopeia}}. Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~).
19. I have sent you the welcome message, kindly register and read through links. Thank you.

Cassiopeia^(talk) 04:40, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

UFC 251

HI Kent Bargo, Greetings. Pls wait until the UFC event page shown the headliner page prior change the headliner info on the lead and info box section. Thank you.09:54, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:UFC251poster.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:UFC251poster.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:11, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Archiving your talk page

Hi Kent Bargo, you can remove warning messages or any messages from your talk page. I would suggest you to achieve it instead of removing them especially the messages are warnings in nature. All the edits in Wikipedia can also be found on the history page. When you request for certain user right, admin will check all info/logs and would wonder why you remove the warning messages which is not a good thing for you. For archive your talk page - see instruction here -Help:Archiving a talk page. Cassiopeia^(talk) 04:44, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

@Cassiopeia: I believe the warning was inappropriate made over a small content dispute war and i went to the article talk page right after. Guess what happen the user slapped "final warnings" to multiple users. I further went help desk to see if this "edit warning" was inappropriate . I think its phony warning message edit. Kent Bargo (talk) 05:01, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi Kent Bargo, I saw the help desk discussion you raised. If there is a content dispute, then set up a discussion in the talk page is a appropriate step and trying to resolve the issue there. A final warning message was inappropriate if the discussion is raised and on going unless a vandalism edit occur which in this case was not. I have also made my comment regarding the local time issue in UFC 251 talk page. In regardless of whether the warning was wrongly placed, it would be advised not to remove them but acrhive it unless is serious derogatory personal attack which counter vandalism editor/admin will revert and remove the content. I am one of the active MMA editors, counter vandalism and new page reviewer trainers, do pop to my talk page if you are not sure of certain things or need advice for I am here to help. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia^(talk) 05:29, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

August 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to UFC 252, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cassiopeia^(talk) 04:07, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Pls do not interpret the "method" yourself as the method is as per Sherdog.com based on WP:MMA guidelines. Cassiopeia^(talk) 04:08, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

@CASSIOPEIA: I think you gave me 2 warning notices when it should of been one please revert 1. I notice you been doing that lately over 1 edit. Thank you,.Kent Bargo (talk) 04:20, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi Kent Bargo, removed the 2nd and thank you for letting me know. Pls read the MMA related article message which I sent you before to familiar with the norm how who to edit MMA related page. Thank you. Cassiopeia^(talk) 04:50, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Khamzat Chimaev (fighter)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Khamzat Chimaev (fighter) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.

Hey man, just an observation here: please provide a proper page creation. There was already one in place as you can see here Draft:Khamzat Chimaev. The page was waiting for him to have three fights before it was approved. The page you created has no content whatsoever and there's no need for the (fighter) part in the title. Take care. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 01:46, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Khamzat Chimaev (fighter)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Khamzat Chimaev (fighter). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Khamzat Chimaev. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Khamzat Chimaev. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Cassiopeia^(talk) 02:22, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Khamzat Chimaev (fighter)

Hello Kent Bargo,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Fbdave, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Khamzat Chimaev (fighter), for deletion, because there's already a page about that topic at Khamzat Chimaev. Please don't be discouraged; we appreciate your effort in creating new articles. To avoid this in the future, consider using the search function to find pages that already cover what you want to write about.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Fbdave}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Fbdave (talk) 18:33, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chase Hooper has been accepted

Chase Hooper, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cassiopeia^(talk) 01:29, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mackenzie Dern, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brazilian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PUPPETMASTER, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Magnus Dominus (talk) 13:56, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi. Sorry you got dragged into the nonsense. Thanks for supporting proper editors and helping prevent disruption. NEDOCHAN (talk) 10:24, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

ping syntax

Regarding this edit, just as a minor technical thing, did you know that you can do {{ping|user1|user2|user3}}? -- RoySmith (talk) 15:38, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Page protection - Gilbert Burns

Hi Kent Bargo, pls note that page protection is not because of the page is popular but because of vandalism and disruptive edits made on the page. NO preemptive page protection should be requested but only after the page has subject to multiple vandalism. Thus do not request the page prior the page is vandalized by multiple editors. Thank you and stay safe. Cassiopeia^(talk) 02:23, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

@Cassiopeia: Hello i have to fully reject the removal my page protection of UFC 258 and Gilbert Burns (MMA Fighter) due to current disruptions. Never indicated it will be pre-preemptive page protection. Not to note it was pretty clear my UFC 258 page protection request made by 17 minutes before you did. I dont see how this was missed. Kent Bargo (talk) 03:00, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Good day. I removed one of the same request it doesnot matter is yours or mine (UFC 258) if you want you can remove mine and re-request again. As for Bruns page, there is only one vandalism on 13 Feb. So it is not subject to page protection. Note, Wikipedia is site can be edited by anyone, registered users or IP users, thus we try to keep it as open as possible unless the page has been vandalized by multiple editors, even we know most likely the page would be vandalised in few hours from now, we still can NOT request for page protection, until multiple vandalized has taken place. I understand your intention is good, but we have to adhere to Wikipedia guidelines. If you are interest in counter vandalism, you can take up WP:CVUA program, choose any trainer as you like and write to them. Let me know if anything else I could help. Stay safe and enjoy the fights. Cassiopeia^(talk) 03:12, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Note, pls do not replace Burns page again, that is disruptive edit. Wait until it has been vandalized. Thank you. Cassiopeia^(talk) 03:15, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

@CASSIOPEIA: I have to fully disagree again, doing this 1RR war on a page protection. Are you the "experts" that handles page protection or what? Kent Bargo (talk) 03:17, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Note, pls do not replace Burns page again, that is disruptive edit. Wait until it has been vandalized. Do listen to experience editors, we are here to support and help you as you could see the discussion on MMA project as why they stated different view than you do. Edit warring is different from normal page vandalism. I am here to help as I am one of the WP:CVUA trainers. Cassiopeia^(talk) 03:20, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

@CASSIOPEIA: The proposal completely unrelated to this issue that you are concern with on the page protection. Just like the SPI we need to let the SPI Experts handle the issue. Same would of been done on that page protection requests. Ongoing behavior can led to warnings, blocks or ANI. Kent Bargo (talk) 03:25, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Then I have no idea what you trying to say without details. Mind elaborate a little more? Cassiopeia^(talk) 03:32, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

February 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at UFC 258. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Cassiopeia^(talk) 03:26, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

You have been informed a few times, regarding the method is as per Sherdog.com base on Wikipedia WP:MMA guidelines. Pls do not interpret the method yourself. Cassiopeia^(talk) 03:28, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

@Cassiopeia: The warning was completely in retaliation of page protection issue above of your obvious error. Kent Bargo (talk) 03:38, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

The above was about this edit of yours see here -1 and has been reverted by other user - see here -2. Thank you. Cassiopeia^(talk) 03:40, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

@CASSIOPEIA: - Not only the warning heavily retaliatory, You disruptive my request for page protection 2 articles when you suppose let page protection users handle it for whatever reason. Kent Bargo (talk) 03:47, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

It is not a retaliation, pls go and check all the editor talk pages who vandalized UFC 258 today, I have placed warning message. I am not here to fight with you but to work with you. I understand you are new editor who has only 147 total main space edits - see here. The way how Wikipedia works is that editors read the guidelines or get help from more experience editors. Wikipedia is a place to collobrated and not fighting. I am sorry you were dragged in to some SPI by other editor and thought issues should to to ANI, SPI and etc, but actually it should always in the talk page first. I have asked you for the details of Burns page, but I have yet to have information from you. Do provide details info of what are the issues of RPP if I have missed anything on the above message thread. Cassiopeia^(talk) 03:57, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

this guy is causing trouble @CASSIOPEIA:. He requested some page moves to be reverted with no substantial reason. I think this account should be restricted. Marty2Hotty2 (talk) 21:19, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

The Block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:37, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kent Bargo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

i did not know that this edit - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A78.190.171.50&type=revision&diff=1007617844&oldid=1007481611 can get you trouble like this user. My bad @NinjaRobotPirate: As i clicked undo revision on my edit after seeing that red box on that user page. I was blocked Kent Bargo (talk) 02:44, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 00:30, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.