User talk:Bryson Johnson

wrong edit

No bro you need to link everything for NLE Choppa mixtape...

For example let’s look at a Justin Bieber album... you will not link Justin Bieber over there in the writer section because that is his name.

But here you will need to link Bryson Potts so we match who it is. You said link the producer names, same with the artist.

Welcome

Hello, Bryson Johnson, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 19:15, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Heyh

Hi

Thatiana campbell (talk) 19:44, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frayser High School (October 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Frayser High School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Frayser High School, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 19:15, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bryson Johnson! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 19:15, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Draft:Rockstar Games Launcher

Hello Bryson Johnson. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Rockstar Games Launcher, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 22:15, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Juicy J, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | ~ 02:48, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I removed pp-p1 from the article that you added after it was previously removed. Bryson Johnson (talk) 02:50, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have removed the pending protection template from articles that were protected, and added it to articles that were not protected. You also have removed the short description template for Three 6 Mafia twice now. Is there a particular reason for all that? ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | ~ 02:52, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I promise it won't happen again. I won't do it again. Bryson Johnson (talk) 02:55, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manuel Cortés-Castañeda (October 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Delta fiver were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Doesn't seem to be of a notable nature, the references used don't reflect notability as much as the article requires.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Manuel Cortés-Castañeda and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Manuel Cortés-Castañeda, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Delta fiver (talk) (UTC) 13:59, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Treadwell High School (Tennessee) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Treadwell High School (Tennessee) does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. Please see the school article guidelines which describes how the content of school articles should be organized, with the aim of providing general guidance to editors — stubs are to be avoided. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Steven (Editor) (talk) 02:19, 20 October 2020 (UTC) I added db-g7 to the article I don't want it anymore. Bryson Johnson (talk) 02:23, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Top Shotta Flow

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Top Shotta Flow requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ~ Amkgp 💬 19:56, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited From Dark to Light, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page JB. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:42, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Hello, I'm Robvanvee. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Yo Gotti, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rob van vee 08:42, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Bryson Johnson (talk) 21:03, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020, and a whole lot of unsourced content

Per the November warning, which has been largely ignored:

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 04:30, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Issue is fixed, thanks for your input by the way. Bryson Johnson (talk) 04:42, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not fixed, and I suspect block evasion. Thank you. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 04:45, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Like i said i wont do it again. I removed some of the unsourced details. Bryson Johnson (talk) 04:51, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can check it out yourself Southwind, Memphis Bryson Johnson (talk) 04:52, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You won't do it again--I think we heard you say that before, Romello. This is all very, very disappointing. Drmies (talk) 18:05, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- You finally caught me, this time I'm not using Wikipedia no more. I'm using the website only for research. Bryson Johnson (talk) 18:08, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Don't consist me in block evasion anymore, because this is very sad I have to go through all of this for nothing. Its sad I had make multiple accounts to get out the situation but FAILED!! So since I won't be using this account anymore, you can actually delete it. Because I tried and tried but keep failing. Bryson Johnson (talk) 18:14, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Well, you could have corrected this at any point this past year, but you just couldn't stop yourself. There's no deletion of accounts; if you had actually cared about the project, you'd have learned what the rules are. And that's one of the reasons your edits get deleted: they do not conform. Drmies (talk) 03:17, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is so crazy, i have to quit Wikipedia and only use this website for a research of articles. When i first join Wikipedia on my original account in March 2020, i didn't know exactly what the rules were. I would ask for another chance, but i have went way too far this passing year. And the reasoning why i couldn't stop myself is because i was blocked by Yamla for six months because i made two or three accounts on the same IP address. I couldn't take the patience for that. So since i will not be responding to this anymore, you can take away talk page access from this account. I will not make any appeals in the UTRS system for a unblock because it will be declined and i have messed up too many chances. Bryson Johnson (talk) 07:05, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 17:55, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]