Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2021/11

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2021

01 November 2021

Indefinite create protection: This article title is the remaining now currently unistalled book namespace and should be creation protection indefinitely. If the article title Book: was created, many people will confused as they will think that this page (article) title is a book namespace. Vitaium (talk) 06:17, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question: was gonna decline as preemptive, but maybe I'm missing something here...? Feel free to expand on the potential risk this could pose, Vitaium. El_C 09:48, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. This is already protected from creation via MediaWiki:Titleblacklist; see the last line. Mz7 (talk) 19:34, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP/new user vandalism. Football manager going through hard times. 2A00:23C5:E187:5F00:1DE8:CDC0:31C8:C7EF (talk) 19:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 21:47, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing regarding recent meme that has continued through and since the page was protected and unprotected, despite active RfC where we are trying to have a discussion. GhostOfDanGurney (talk) 19:45, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator OhnoitsjamieMelanieN (talk) 00:11, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 19:58, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator OhnoitsjamieMelanieN (talk) 00:11, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I won't pretend to know if it's a Halloween prank or whatever, but there has been a disruptive barrage of IP users asking editors of the page to violate BLP policy by putting false information. One purports it comes from some Google search. Trillfendi (talk) 20:26, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator OhnoitsjamieMelanieN (talk) 00:12, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Range of IPs vandalising this page. Bobherry Talk Edits 21:01, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note Multiple users are doing it now as well. Bobherry Talk Edits 21:07, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator OhnoitsjamieMelanieN (talk) 00:13, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent edit warring. Mad Loux (talk) 22:36, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:17, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: - IP vandalism again.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:43, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:19, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism after the Saints beat the Buccaneers earlier. (talk) 23:25, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP socks of Vote (X) for Change. Again.   Aloha27  talk  16:46, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:09, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP addresses seem to be adding an EP (unsourced and with a quick Google search, I found that it is only mentioned by depreciated or unreliable sources) - If it is real then we will add it once it is announced otherwise, I feel it would be wise to protect the page for maybe a few weeks until it is announced officially with reliable sources. Maxwell King123321 23:13, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent theories have been going around that the miniature is Anne of Cleves as opposed to Howard because of ridiculous, circumstantial evidence. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/presumed-portrait-catherine-howard-may-actually-depict-anne-cleves-180977670/ Dancingtudorqueen (talk) 23:50, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:23, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by IPs, who are repeatedly moving commas, which violates MOS:REFPUNCT. The page was previously semi-protected in June for one month because of similar edits. Requesting longer-term protection of this page. Johnj1995 (talk) 00:15, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:23, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Several IP vandalists this evening. Tampabay721 (talk) 02:57, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:51, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 03:51, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:58, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 03:52, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:02, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 03:53, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:06, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP disruption Maleschreiber (talk) 04:40, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please continue to discuss content issues on the talk page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:15, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editors continue to change some of the article verbiage to be out of compliance with MOS:LDS and makes the article inaccurate. Bahooka (talk) 04:48, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:29, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 05:11, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:32, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. — Leif Eriksson VV (talk) 15:29, 30 October 2021‎ (UTC)[reply]

Note: Leif Eriksson VV, I can't figure out what's happening. El_C 17:24, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Some anonymous users adding unsourced statements in this page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leif Eriksson VV (talkcontribs) 05:34, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Leif Eriksson VV, can you provide a diff or two and briefly explain what was added that was unsourced? Sorry, I'm still having a hard time parsing the content of the edits on that page. El_C 09:51, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term abuse, block evasion by Special:Contributions/2607:FEA8:BD42:D500:0:0:0:0/64. Binksternet (talk) 05:15, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:36, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent multiple IP vandalism. BilCat (talk) 05:39, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:38, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive edit by IP editor against consensus. BilCat (talk) 00:31, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The single disruptive editor has had a final warning and can be blocked if they persist. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:30, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated addition of unsourced content by IPs. Latest is probably currently blocked 180.194.83.7 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Adakiko (talk) 01:18, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:38, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Sneed/Chuck vandalism again right after page was unprotected   I LIKE PIE   02:21, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:45, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Eevee01(talk) 04:44, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:22, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Cwmhiraeth: Did you really want to ecp this? Cheers. Lectonar (talk) 09:01, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (Repeating this to satisfy the bot.) @Lectonar: I intended to semi-protect the article and applied ecp by mistake. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:31, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Protecting for a couple of weeks would stop the repeated spamming by a sockpuppet - see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gdasfh847. 10mmsocket (talk) 08:35, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Vanjagenije. Semi-protection should suffice. Favonian (talk) 11:13, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Silly childish edits by multiple contributors edit-warring to replace page with redirect to their favourite football clubs. 10mmsocket (talk) 10:04, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Favonian (talk) 11:12, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Protecting admin last edited 11 years ago; now a redirect with low mainspace transclusions and little potential disruption from IPs and non-AC editors Sennecaster (Chat) 03:49, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Anarchyte (talk) 09:58, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Page was create-protected after repeated superflous recreation in 2014, and since then the subject has become notable. I have already contacted the protecting admin ReaderofthePack and he has not yet responded. Devonian Wombat (talk) 08:45, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Anarchyte (talk) 09:58, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection. Reason: High level of disruptive editing. Jingiby (talk) 06:08, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:01, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This Australian football player has recently been arrested in New York and charged with forcible touching of a woman and assault of a man. His football club has stood him down (but haven't released him and are still paying his wages) and he has a court date set for 8 December 2021. Since the news broke, the page has been vandalised a few times, and has been updated incorrectly to state that he's a "former player" and that the club has released him. Requesting that the page be protected until after the court date to lessen the amount of such edits. SuperJew (talk) 11:22, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Usedtobecool ☎️ 13:38, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. — DaxServer (talk) 08:07, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 16:31, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism following a Vikings loss last night. Swagging (talk) 15:37, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 16:40, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 16:36, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 16:44, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Present unsourced or poorly sourced content after Miller was traded to the Rams. Both teams have not announced the trade yet. Swagging (talk) 16:36, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruption by block evading IP sockpuppets of 103.210.146.65 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), semi-protected twice in October because of this. FDW777 (talk) 09:20, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive Editing, False Informations BrandonUserna (talk) 14:00, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism since September BrandonUserna (talk) 14:13, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism since September BrandonUserna (talk) 14:19, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism Concerns BrandonUserna (talk) 14:21, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mad Loux (talk) 14:47, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. GreaterPonce665 (TALK) 14:53, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. GreaterPonce665 (TALK) 14:54, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. GreaterPonce665 (TALK) 14:53, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: hit entertainment limited was owned by mattel. Lindenbridgeschoolstudent (talk) 18:19, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That’s what the article says: it was acquired by Mattel in 2011 and absorbed into Mattel Creations division in 2016. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:08, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism by a Turkish IP BrandonUserna (talk) 15:04, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:PROFRINGE edit warring by IP and by new account. tgeorgescu (talk) 15:39, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only two disruptive edits since September 16. BusterD (talk) 16:42, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs (176.180.153.85 and 46.193.68.60), most likely meat puppets since they are from the same geolocation, removing properly sourced content without citing a valid reason. M.Bitton (talk) 16:36, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:54, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 18:46, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent efforts to remove "legal issues" without source by multiple users. Potential sock puppetry. Mad Loux (talk) 19:41, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: User Binksternet keeps reverting a necessary edit that fixes some incorrect and outdated information on the otherwise completed page without providing a reason, other than stating: "rv Facebook and Youtube nonsense." I do not know how to report him for vandalizing the page and starting an edit war. The page needs to be maintained at version 1052949669 (second to last edit) 2601:44:C27F:83A0:B15B:D4FD:1BA3:F229 (talk) 04:08, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This may not work out how the requester wanted. BusterD (talk) 04:31, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Requesting ip user has contacted me on my personal talk after realizing my protection affected several ip users acting in correlation. I have since applied a mild warning/welcome to their talk page. BusterD (talk) 04:55, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 2601:44:C27F:83A0:B15B:D4FD:1BA3:F229 (talk · contribs) blocked by EvergreenFir for block evasion. BusterD (talk) 17:17, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The protection expired and the sporadic disruption has resumed. This probably needs protecting while COVID is a hot topic (I suggest 12 months). Alexbrn (talk) 18:21, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sudden spike in vandalism from multiple users. Mad Loux (talk) 20:13, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 20:15, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant WP:DE from Preston dweh. BrickMaster02 (talk) 19:29, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Jellington:

I have the is page on my watchlist. For sometime now, the article and or talk page has been vandalized by accounts in that category. The page was temporarily semi-protected, but the problem still exists. The page needs permanent semi-protection and pending changes protection if both can be implemented. This can't continue on any longer. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 20:47, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated re-creation with requests by likely block evading IP addresses and others to have the draft created. The draft is already under protection. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 21:06, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

02 November 2021

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Resumption of disruptive editing shortly after expire of previous protection. This page has also been the target of a prolific sock-master, so SPing seems like the right call, again. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 12:16, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 23:04, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing vandalism from Egyptian academy, newly registered account and Egyptian IP address. Semi-protection for a short time might seem them get bored and move on. 10mmsocket (talk) 14:09, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 23:06, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Woodroar (talk) 21:33, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 23:01, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kleinpecan (talk) 22:56, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 22:58, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 20:02, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. clpo13(talk) 20:16, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Spate of personal-attack vandalism from a few IPs in southern Virginia targeting a local resident over the past few days. Toddst1 (talk) 23:47, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 23:55, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High rate of vandalism beginning with November 1st. tgeorgescu (talk) 23:48, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 23:53, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High levels of vandalism (incorrect plot summary and character names) 2600:8800:120:8300:FD06:5BD0:9DE3:9796 (talk) 21:45, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 22:02, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 23:57, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP persistently makes whitewashing edits. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:56, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., IP warned about a pattern of disruption to lead paragraphs that they don't appear to like. Acroterion (talk) 01:03, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism; continuing after protection ended. - AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 01:46, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 02:46, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Acroterion (talk) 02:49, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 02:48, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Frequent sockpuppet vandalism and self promotion. Mad Loux (talk) 14:00, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:34, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent edit-warring by an unregistered editor. This goes back many months and this editor is not engaging in discussion despite there being an open discussion in Talk specifically for this topic. ElKevbo (talk) 00:09, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:42, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 01:04, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page has been indefinitely semi-protected for more than a decade. Most recently, El C added indef semi protection in February 2020. Dennis Brown upgraded to a temporary extended confirmed protection. That protection just lapsed, and the article is currently on move protected. There has been no disruption since the lapse, but I wonder if the admins' intention was to maintain indefinite semi-protection. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 03:01, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 05:41, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. IPs are making non-constructive edits. They cannot be warned as the IP changes frequently. And I don't think that they will see talk page messages. Shinnosuke15, 00:48, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:50, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 02:47, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection:, Reason: Constant and repeat vandalism by IPs and new accounts. Every single IP-made edit back to 28 April 2021 (I quit checking for earlier instances) was vandalism. Dozens have been made. All very rude, crude and socially unacceptable. According to the talk page, the latest angle of vandalism (naming an alleged person) has been going on since 2019. Platonk (talk) 05:28, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 05:44, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, constant modifications of the work of confirmed users Aldebaran69 (talk) 02:31, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:59, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing with a known sock puppet. Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Jellington lists all the sockpuppets. Needs to be edit protected as temporary semi-protection is not enough. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 03:23, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:07, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection - Continous vandalism and disruptive editing through change of content without justification by countless IPs. Merangs (talk) 03:28, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:15, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Shipping with other Twice members nonsense. —hueman1 (talk contributions) 05:12, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:23, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Shipping with other Twice members nonsense. —hueman1 (talk contributions) 05:13, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:23, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Shipping with other Twice members nonsense. —hueman1 (talk contributions) 05:13, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:26, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Shipping with other Twice members nonsense. —hueman1 (talk contributions) 05:13, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:30, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Shipping with other Twice members nonsense. —hueman1 (talk contributions) 05:14, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:33, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Shipping with other Twice members nonsense. —hueman1 (talk contributions) 05:14, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:38, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruption by block evading IP sockpuppets of ThesePicklesLoveSosa (talk · contribs), who been blocked in August. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 05:56, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:49, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing from IPs- persistent addition of unsourced/bogus credits. Magitroopa (talk) 06:29, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:56, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing attack by multiple IP and newly-registered editors. 10mmsocket (talk) 07:46, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 08:02, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Need temporary semi on this article, and maybe permanent pending changes protection. Recent science discovery that we are trying to carefully work into the article is also leading to a lot of less than helpful IP edits. Maybe protection for 90 days until the newsy news dies down. Montanabw(talk) 15:34, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see one revert on September 28; what disruption are you specifically referring to? OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:03, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:59, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 02:49, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. clpo13(talk) 05:45, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive IP editing. Citobun (talk) 08:56, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The reason why your edit to remove the hatnote was reverted has been spelt out in the edit summary. If you think that hatnote should indeed be removed in contrary to the common practice please propose so in the article's talk page. There have been no disruptive edits and WP:RFPP isn't the proper venue to settle something as such. Please learn to collaborate with others and discuss your ideas with fellow editors. 124.217.188.145 (talk) 09:42, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 09:56, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: New user, reported at WP:UAA, is continuing to make multiple COI edits despite being warned. Temporary protection would stop this until UAA process completes. 10mmsocket (talk) 09:41, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 09:58, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Uness232 (talk) 09:47, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Just one disruptive edit in the last 2 months. Lectonar (talk) 09:59, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP's keeps vandalizing the website address $8talk2me 13:02, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism by multiple IP editors Tammbecktalk 14:07, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Pokémonfanxyz; now also Serialbongo (CU confirmed but not yet blocked as of this report), ... RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 14:10, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~TheresNoTime (to explain!) 14:19, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Closed as redirect at AfC (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Better Late Than Never: In Memory of Paul C), but article creator Ceedub refuses to abide by the decision and has restored the article. They also tried removing the AfC template as an IP [1] and have already been banned from a different topic for refusing to follow procedures, so they have a history of ignoring Wikipedia guidelines and warnings. The redirect needs to be restored per AfC outcome and salted, otherwise Ceedub will simply recreate the article again. Richard3120 (talk) 00:31, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've warned the user, and will block if they persist. OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:37, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ohnoitsjamie: they will – they've already repeatedly removed the AfD notices on their other articles currently nominated for deletion, Day of D'Struction and Dramacide. Richard3120 (talk) 00:55, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Kent2121 (talk) 10:11, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 12:52, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Previously had pending changes for two years, until earlier this year. FDW777 (talk) 15:03, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. From Godwatch49 — DaxServer (talk) 08:28, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Latest sock has been blocked by User:Girth Summit. BusterD (talk) 16:36, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This page has been moved to Bhanumati (Mahabharata). Protection applied at the new target. BusterD (talk) 23:09, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... (CC) Tbhotch 18:26, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – The entity is non-notable. It has been redirected by several editors in good standing but it is still be being restored. scope_creepTalk 10:06, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 17:35, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Adding of poor unsourced content by IP address. Requested protection until season is over. Fade258 (talk) 11:59, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 17:37, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The new spammy account was continuously reverting my edit thrice since yesterday, please protect this page. Static Hash (talk) 11:30, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 12:54, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Check now please, the person is still reverting edits, new spammy account --Static Hash (talk) 14:45, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Nthep (talk) 16:52, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: User Chronus is adding two sources to affirm a false claim (contrary to what both sources state). He is unwilling to talk with the community first in the discussion page. I reverted his edits with this explanation: "The sources aren't valid, the first says: "Spiritism was a new religious movement", it is not anymore. The second says: "the wider spiritist movement (...) is not a new religious movement, in that it is now several hundred years old". Therefore I request protection to avoid edit warring, until he is willing to discuss with the community and explain why he is affirming something that is contrary to what is stated in both sources Bafuncius (talk) 18:08, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A mixed of Vandalism, unsourced, and poorly sourced content after his DUI charge. Swagging (talk) 18:11, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 18:23, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

03 November 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing election could use some protection. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 18:24, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:03, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive edits from IP's. Reading BeansTalk to the Beans 18:51, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism as of the past two days. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 21:52, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent IP vandalism and disruption due to ongoing election. KidAdSPEAK 23:18, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 00:12, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I am requesting that this page gets SALTed because it has been deleted seven times in the past, with six of these deletions being either G1 or G3 deletions. I don't see a reason why this page should be created, considering that there is already an article with the same name, and the word itself is a common target of vandalism. When I tagged the page for its last deletion, I requested that the page get SALTed but it is yet to be protected from creation. Thank you. EDM fan 2 (talk) 02:10, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected – Muboshgu (talk) 02:24, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by multiple IPs in the last two weeks, as soon as the previous protection ended. Ïvana (talk) 03:25, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – edit war over whether or not he is a world series champion. Troutfarm27 (Talk) 03:59, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Continuous targets of sock IP from 120.22.0.0/16 and many new named accounts before; see SPI. (Cannot block IP due to dynamic range. Account creation already blocked. Template namespace editing already blocked, though presumably blocking article namespace would end up in too much collateral.) After a few days of reverting, asking to temp semi their most common targets ([2]). —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 10:23, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also added as many of the articles as possible to the partial rangeblock, for good measure. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 04:47, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EDJT840 (talk) 13:33, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:19, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 05:03, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:59, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Abuse from Foundation-banned vandal WP:LTA/GRP, who uses a VPN service to hop IPs. JavaHurricane 05:32, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of Indefinite, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:10, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated unsourced additions and even socking. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 14:33, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:25, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuous disruptive behavior from the date-changing vandal from Poland. I think a longer protection period is needed. ResPM (T🔈 🎵C) 15:51, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:51, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Mobile editor keeps adding 'questionable' material, while ignoring WP:BRD. Continues to 'revert', rather then discuss his proposed changes. GoodDay (talk) 01:56, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Spike in unsourced changes by new and anonymous accounts immediately after the previous protection period expired. It is the same kind of change (adding a personal estimate of the number of fighters) being made each time and the editors are ignoring the talk page comments and edit summaries of their reverters. Requesting a longer protection period than seven days. CentreLeftRight 17:08, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:04, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Promotional editing by the subject himself (IP geolocates to the university, where he teaches). TrangaBellam (talk) 20:06, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:27, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page has been repeatedly targeted by hoaxers, presumably IP socks of HarveyTeenager. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 20:10, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:31, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism continues to be an issue here. HurricaneKappa (talk) 05:50, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:53, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Eevee01(talk) 07:06, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:00, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple vandals in last 48 hours. 10mmsocket (talk) 07:33, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:58, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Requested semi protection earlier because of COI editor, however that editor was blocked. Now it seems like the same editor is back, this time as an IP making the same disruptive edits. Please semi-protect to stop this happening. 10mmsocket (talk) 15:22, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done @10mmsocket: It seems to me that the present article is incorrect and that the IP is trying to rectify this. Please discuss this issue on the talk page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:37, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Eridian314 (talk) 16:35, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The vandalism was many months ago. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:54, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I just had to revert an edit that made the page say that only 1% of the world energy is from fossil fuels. Probably some kind of stupid COP26 joke. I think the article should be protected. Touyats (talk) 18:51, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done No longer on the main page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:06, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Bhaijaan was protected from recreation, editor has now moved the draft to Bhaijaan (film). At a minimum, need to protect the new targe. Ravensfire (talk) 16:23, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done ECP-protected for 6 months. Lectonar (talk) 10:56, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection: Persistent sockpuppetry --- Because master IP address Rgalo10 loves to tagged their own socks but it was denied from investigation please remove the sock tag obviously he's tagging him self.172.58.224.60 (talk) 23:14, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

¡Already protected just now semi protection tag is missing has to be done.172.58.230.214 (talk) 02:46, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Protected is protected,despite a missing icon. Lectonar (talk) 12:02, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: To prevent vandalism. Marklucasapelin (talk) 04:27, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, we do not protect pages preemptively, and there is no ongoing disruption--Ymblanter (talk) 08:01, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive editing. - Daveout(talk) 08:30, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 12:06, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Hello, I noticed that there was/still is an intensive edit warring at Russia (disambiguation) since 25 August 2021. Short summary of the problem: patrollers Clarityfiend (1, 2) and sysop Bkonrad (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) removed links to articles unrelated with Russia. However, editor with very few edits kept edit warring with them and "won" using a brute force (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8). Such behavior clearly do not comply with the Wikipedia:Assume good faith, thus this user should receive sanctions and this disambiguation page requires increased protection. Pay attention that he kept accusing a sysop about Wikipedia:Vandalism as a reason for edit warring. -- Pofka (talk) 08:32, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The dispute doesn't seem to be active; I see that you've cleaned it up in your latest revision. If Korwinski resumes edit-warring, feel free to ping me and I'll block. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:25, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Stale. Lectonar (talk) 10:54, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The information that Turkish Airlines flies to this airport removes. Flights delayed due to Covid-19 doesn't mean they won't last forever Eray08yigit (talk) 20:32, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 12:00, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There have been many IP users changing things around that shouldn't be bothered with. Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 20:45, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 12:01, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Recent IP vandalism - Users have been adding false information on kaiju video games. Kaiju Geek (talk) 23:38, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 12:03, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent level of malicious trolling, edits from the public to include legitimate lies with nefarious motives. 2601:19A:8201:4420:7D4F:6A75:F755:B196 (talk) 23:53, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 12:03, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated removal of sourced ex-spouse content by multiple IPs w/o explanation. Adakiko (talk) 09:51, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Parvej Husen Talukder (talk) 13:57, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Pro company edits are being made, company URL being added, violation of wiki rules under WP:PUFF Hatchens (talk) 15:05, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:12, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. wizzito | say hello! 20:33, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:17, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continual disruptive edits against consensus on BLP. Ghmyrtle (talk) 12:30, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Seems spurred by the latest spike of controversy (see Special:Diff/1053311564). A few days or a week might be enough time for things to die down (or, well, return to a simmer) for now. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 15:49, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: An IP hopping vandal keeps on adding hoax information on this article. The article has been semi-protected for one month on September 16 but after the protection expired, the IP resumed their vandalism activity. - WayKurat (talk) 16:15, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 16:21, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple silly vandalisms, IPs and newly created account. Ifnord (talk) 16:18, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. clpo13(talk) 16:20, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Various IPs making nonsense edits. bonadea contributions talk 16:30, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. ip hopping editor(s) are consistently removing content to pov push. always forever (talk) 16:32, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring by an IP. tgeorgescu (talk) 22:32, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 17:11, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Addition of overly promotional text by two IPs. Kleinpecan (talk) 22:51, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. One of the IPs is the page creator. Based on a brief search, I'm not seeing reliable secondaries which cover this. This may not meet the standard for inclusion. BusterD (talk) 17:17, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP Vandalism due to Barbados' transition to republic occurring November 30. Gemini.skywalker (talk) 11:46, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: 67.79.24.90 blanked the page recently and it got reverted.
Set the protection level to:
Edit: Pending changes, Move: Admin
Faster than Thunder (talk) 14:36, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only one recent disruptive edit. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:45, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Other users want to implement changes in the article which are not consistent with the style implemented in the other articles. Just to maintain status quo in order to discuss the details to fix this issue, I am requesting that this page be protected temporarily until a consensus has been reached. At least 3 days would be enough. Thank you.AR E N Z O Y 1 6At a l k 11:50, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, apparently not needed anymore. Apologies for not reacting on time, and please cone back if disruption resumes.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:13, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism/edit warring. An account was blocked (only for 24 hours!!!) for edit warring for what seemed to be racist reasons (see this edit summary) [3] and has now returned as an IP. 192.76.8.84 (talk) 10:32, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Same reason as Ọranyan, edit warring and vandalism by the same account. 192.76.8.84 (talk) 10:33, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated violations of the MOS:DEADNAME guideline by anonymous editors and new editors, and other disputed edits related to the subject's gender identity. Few if any useful edits from IP editors or new editors, and they have made no talk page contributions. The page has already been semi-protected twice, so indefinite semi-protection may be appropriate. Verbcatcher (talk) 13:36, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page is targeted by an off-wiki campaign to alter the page.[4] The page was protected last week but as soon as the protection expired, the vandals returned. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 13:52, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article has been suffering from persistent IP edits to the lead ignoring the main text content, focusing on aspects of its reception, specifically its AI. The edits have ranged from reverting to an old lead to adjustments which remove what the IP seems to see as unwanted information. ProtoDrake (talk) 17:48, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 18:42, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive editing by a series of proxy IPs. CMD (talk) 18:16, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:34, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 12:13, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The last vandalism revert was almost a month ago. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:57, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 15:37, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: No instance of vandalism in the last 7 months, and very little before that this year. The rationale for protecting it back in 2017 has disappeared. Even if vandalism comes back, Recent changes reviewers will easily be able to handle it, considering the overwhelmingly constructive edits Double Plus Ungood (talk) 20:03, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Double Plus Ungood:, have you discussed this with Ymblanter, the admin who pending changes protected the page? – Muboshgu (talk) 20:42, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I am concerned, pending changes protection is working as intended, though I am not going to object if another admin wants to lift it.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:49, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm on the fence on this one. Double Plus Ungood is slightly incorrect, there was last vandalism on the article five months ago.[5] ClueBot caught it, though. 2020 appears somewhat worse than 2021 has been regarding vandalism. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:04, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined After some deliberation, I think this is fine. Although there is not much vandalism, the pending changes protection prevents the rare edits which are. On the other hand, the rarity of overall edits doesn't cause any undue work for the pending-changes reviewers. If another admin wants to unprotect: go ahead. Lectonar (talk) 16:26, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . Hrishikesh M. S keshu (talk) 13:10, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Malabar rebellion of 1921 (also known by the names Moplah massacre, Moplah riots, Mappila riots) started as a resistance against the British colonial rule in Malabar region of Kerala. Unfortunately the popular uprising was ended against the destruction of hindu temples, rapping women's and children's, looting the wealth of hindus and mass massacre of hindus.}}

Declined Edit-requests can be made on the article's talk-page. Lectonar (talk) 16:28, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I believe there is enough coverage of Sidetalk to support its notability. I have created a draft at User:Bait30/Sidetalk that shows this. According to the page logs, the page was SALTed because of previous promotional editing. I am unaffiliated with Sidetalk and my draft is not promotional. Pinging the protecting admin, David Gerard.  Bait30  Talk 2 me pls? 16:53, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Lotta passing mentions and a Forbes contributor blog that need attention, but you're a real editor and the draft would probably survive CSD (though AFD remains an open question) - unprotecting - David Gerard (talk) 17:26, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done – for the bot. Favonian (talk) 19:18, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

04 November 2021

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 19:02, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Bestagon21:38, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: This BLP page is subject to a high level of media interest due to ongoing current events relating to allegations of improper conduct in his office as an MP. This page may benefit from a temporary semi-protected status to curb a recent influx of vandalism. Johntalk 22:47, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Endorse this request for disruptive editing; was about to make it myself. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 23:10, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Nippon rise (talkcontribs) 17:56, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Willhohenstein (talk) 18:10, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:14, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism DG745 (talk) 21:15, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Sneed/Chuck LTA is back.   I LIKE PIE   23:34, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP disruption and vandalism. KidAdSPEAK 01:04, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Talkpage only being used by an WP:LTA for vandalism requested moves. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:27, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 03:58, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated redirect hijacking. Jalen Folf (talk) 21:05, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been persistently vandalized by an IP-hopping editor targeting only this page since february 2020 [6]. After the vandalism began, there have been 205 edits to the article [7], of which only one [8] was not by the vandal, editors removing vandalism, or bots.

The page has been temporarily semi-protected three times before, with no vandalism occuring during the protected period, and vandalism resuming after protection ended each time.

I think this calls for indefinite semi-protection, or at least temporary semi-protection that lasts for a year or more. Knuthove (talk) 22:53, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Softblocked COI editor is using IPs to replace sourced content with unsourced content. Cabayi (talk) 09:44, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:45, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 00:51, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – /38 IP range is blocked for 60 hours. Jalen Folf (talk) 02:19, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 03:50, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP disruptive editing. Neutralitytalk 19:57, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:59, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Donnowin1 (talk) 20:09, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:05, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – see the history of this article; all of this reverted & surely vandalized by IPs... It should protect for long time (semi protect) ~. Limited Idea4me (talk) 20:49, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The existing pending changes protection seems to be working just fine. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 03:53, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Several new IP editors have come to alter the article and remove a clause that changes the whole nature of article, effectively reinforcing anti-vaxxer sentiment. scope_creepTalk 21:50, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Article was semi-protected after this request was made. None of the vandalism was coming from established editors, so extended confirmed protection is unnecessary. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 03:55, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent logged out hijacking by IPs of Anthony k ortiz. Jalen Folf (talk) 20:36, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:09, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuing disruptive editing, some of it by auto confirmed users. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:45, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:15, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Increase in disruptive edits to the article by IP editors in the past three days after the previous page protection expired on October 30. One of these IP edits removed relevant content from the page; this went unnoticed for a couple days until just now because it was then followed by an unrelated bot edit that removed a protection template seven minutes later. –WPA (talk) 23:41, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:21, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by different IPs. MartinezMD (talk) 04:07, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. David Gerard (talk) 08:13, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - SUN EYE 1 05:17, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - The vandal looks persistent, and the page recently came off 3 months' autoconfirmed, so making it longer this time. Also blocked the IP for abusive vandalism - David Gerard (talk) 08:09, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nippon rise (talkcontribs)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. David Gerard (talk) 08:04, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Language change seems to be the more frequent version of vandalism currently on this page. SP013 (talk) 00:56, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:41, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Tendentious editing from a disruptive user (see this edit for reference [10]) Estnot (talk) 09:52, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:52, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive editing from IP addresses that are in what appears to be the same range Estnot (talk) 10:04, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:52, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: BLP Policy Violations. Bobherry Talk Edits 10:23, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. I can see there seems to be some conflict regarding the subject's pronouns, but I'm not sure it rises to the level of protection just yet—looks like the brief spike in activity was due to an appearance in a Google Doodle, and no one has edited the article for more than 24 hours now. (In any case, WP:BLP is surely not the right policy, since the subject has been deceased since 1896.) Mz7 (talk) 06:51, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – It appears Johnson said something dumb on a radio station podcast, and multiple IPs are taking upon themselves to place this "corrected" information into the article. Tarl N. (discuss) 04:46, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:30, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Someone with a fast-changing IP who keeps posting the same likely-BLP-violating screed to the article. A couple of weeks' autoconfirmed would be minimal and helpful - David Gerard (talk) 07:54, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:41, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Same reason as Ọranyan, repeated vandalism by IP socks of the same blocked user 163.1.15.238 (talk) 12:11, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. There are full blocks on the /64 ranges and a partial block over the /39. This seems to be mitigating the issue for the time being. Mz7 (talk) 06:53, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Until season is over. Fade258 (talk) 14:45, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mz7 (talk) 06:55, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP disruption in response to recent election and related news coverage. KidAdSPEAK 17:45, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:28, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism and disruption. KidAdSPEAK 02:42, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:27, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continual addition of false information by IPs. S.A. Julio (talk) 17:08, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Wow, a League protection request that makes sense. Thanks, S.A. Julio, you've restored my faith in league'ing! El_C 11:45, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Protected multiple times but placed under 30/500 WP:ARBPIA sanctions related to the Iran–Israel proxy conflict. 142.112.224.41 (talk) 03:10, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This page cannot be ECP, but i suggest semi-protection instead due to nature of distruptive edits. 36.77.93.101 (talk) 05:55, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. IP, this looks more like a legit content dispute than disruption. As such, disputants are expected address the matter on the article talk page or at WP:RSN. El_C 11:38, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism: An IP user is vandalising the page every day and so I have to fix it every day. Diptyajit (talk) 08:39, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:42, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jasper Deng (talk) 08:52, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:46, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Several IPs keep adding the films for not known reason. NSAandGCHQ (talk) 18:55, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:25, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 05:09, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:35, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Permanent protection was applied in 2011 when the player was rumoured to be transferred. Ten years later, and approaching the age of 40, he no longer has the profile to warrant permanent protection. There have only been six edit requests in that decade, mostly of trivial details such as image captions, or IPs asking to use newer photographs. Relevant admin is semi-retired. 2A00:23C5:E187:5F00:1DE8:CDC0:31C8:C7EF (talk) 19:51, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected. El_C 11:54, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Article was protected due to persistent vandalism upon the death of this individual in January of 2016. However, with that period now close to six years in the past, all edits to the article since that subsided have been minor tweaks by those autoconfirmed users allowed to make such changes. 98.160.169.160 (talk) 22:53, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected. WereSpielChequers, I've just gone ahead, hope that's okay. El_C 12:02, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes that's fine. I've put it on my watchlist temporarily, though I can't claim to regularly check the whole of my watchlist. If I spot significant further vandalism I'll put pending changes on it. ϢereSpielChequers 13:20, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . 2600:1003:B009:42:DCA2:66EB:F754:39D7 (talk) 03:27, 4 November 2021 (UTC) John cena is cool[reply]

Declinedxaosflux Talk 10:34, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because it is preventing me from adding a more inclusive pronunciation guide (eg, no one in Australia pronounced Nepal with an /ɪ/ . 120.18.107.71 (talk) 07:22, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declinedxaosflux Talk 10:34, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent reversion without discussing on the talk page. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 11:17, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Laterthanyouthink, likely not even active enough for WP:PC, which doesn't look like it'd be needed regardless, since the disruption, while sparse, gets corrected usually same day. El_C 11:50, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I think it is safe to remove the protection on this page since the managerial move has been announced by the Padres. GoWarriors151718 (talk) 04:55, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected. GoWarriors151718, the protection expires at the end of day. El_C 12:05, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary. It's been over a decade since semi. Try lower to PC. TheRafaMarc15 (talk) 09:29, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected. Most likely still needed. Too active for pc. El_C 12:20, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Abuse by banned vandal WP:LTA/GRP, who uses a VPN service. JavaHurricane 13:16, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected. Favonian (talk) 18:28, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term disruption. This person is persistently edit-warring, using this IP many times, preceded by Special:Contributions/86.23.187.74 (blocked twice), Special:Contributions/86.14.146.46 (blocked once), and Special:Contributions/86.13.118.247 (blocked five times). Binksternet (talk) 13:21, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I am happy to re-protect and escalate if needed, but this page has no prior history of page protection. Will add this to my watchlist permanently. Please call on me if needed. BusterD (talk) 18:32, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. TheWikiholic (talk) 18:00, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 18:07, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

05 November 2021

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing Tammbecktalk 11:53, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Materialscientist. Wug·a·po·des 23:24, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated daily unexplained removal of valid, cited content by a new user. IAmTheNeil (talk) 12:50, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @IAmTheNeil: you should usually warn the editor about our edit warring policy before requesting page protection. I have done so. You can report them to WP:EWN if they continue after the protection expires. Wug·a·po·des 23:28, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – 5 RR by IP user.   Aloha27  talk  14:26, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent edit warring from multiple IPs making the same edit, violating WP:COVERSONG. Magatta (talk) 19:05, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 20:22, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Returning GRP, and as he uses a VPN service and hops IPs to vandalise, he won't stop till semi is applied. JavaHurricane 13:21, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Wug·a·po·des 23:29, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. TornadoLGS (talk) 00:37, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lou sassle 159.118.228.28 (talk) 20:52, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing & sockpuppetry. FMSky (talk) 13:54, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only a couple edits since protection expired and none are so bad that protection is needed immediately. Wug·a·po·des 23:32, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent Vandalism. Wxman28 (talk) 14:10, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Looks more like content dispute. 36.68.164.48 (talk) 19:26, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined agree with anon, looks like typical BRD stuff. Wug·a·po·des 23:33, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP subject to unsourced additions and vandalism. Egghead06 (talk) 20:35, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Mattythewhite. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:01, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 15:59, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:14, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Limited Idea4me (talk) 20:29, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:02, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. twotwofourtysix(My talk page and contributions) 05:28, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Euryalus. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:04, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: disruptive edits in the form of IP vandalism. Kwesi Yema (talk) 16:16, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:20, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Continued IP disruption. L33tm4n (talk) 17:06, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:34, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Currently the subject of today's Google Doodle. Lomrjyo (publican) (taxes) 17:10, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:44, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:16, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:50, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Various anonymous lvl6 IP's deleting updates. Zyrrrrr (talk) 21:28, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:07, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopping by banned user. They literally have the same edit summaries as well; 'stop racism' [11] [12]. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:20, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:20, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism & edit tests in quick succession by two IPs and one new account. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 23:25, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:28, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Recommend a couple days given she's a current candidate for office during the results period. IPs keep changing "democratic socialist" to less accurate statements like "communist" alongside various edit wars about non-neutral info already discussed on talk. Some IP blocks might work too. Wug·a·po·des 23:22, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:15, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection. High level of IP disruptipns. Jingiby (talk) 04:25, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Kinu.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:12, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of Vandalism. 2409:4072:6C0D:DD63:5BD0:2238:EED2:BAF0 (talk) 05:57, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:11, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

At least temporary semi-protection: The man, governor of the Phoenix Suns, is subject to a meteoric increase of recent news coverage and public scrutiny, due to investigations and reports revealing his roles in the reputed toxic environment of the Phoenix Suns organization, which include him personally being an alleged bully, racist, sexist, and serial inappropriate interactor with colleagues, staff, coaches, and players; and encouraging/looking the other way when others do the same. Predictably, this has led to a higher-than-normal amount of unconstructive IP edits and subsequent reverts. Mungo Kitsch (talk) 06:52, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:09, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Editor YLoGM is edit warring to preserve an unreferenced article on mainspace, reviewed at NPP. I've left a note to get them to look at WP:REFB and possibly do the work in draft so they have time to learn referencing, but they have not taken it on. scope_creepTalk 15:22, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined References have now been added. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:09, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The article has been edited disruptively and with persistent vandalism. Unsourced materials are added, (e.g. here, here, here) , the article's motive are tried to be changed (e.g. here, here, here (for this article, the info/motive/ideology added is neither included in any of the refs, nor refs regarding those are added)) and other politically motivated edits (kindly check edit history). So protection for a period of time must be given. AnkurWiki 16:19, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Please warn the editor's concerned on their talk pages. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:27, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Khirurg (talk) 17:09, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:39, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – see history and current coi investigation. Idan (username is Zvikorn) (talk) 18:42, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. OhNoitsJamie is on the job! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:00, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruption by block evading IP sockpuppets of ThesePicklesLoveSosa (talk · contribs), who been blocked in August. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 21:52, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:10, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruption by block evading IP sockpuppets of ThesePicklesLoveSosa (talk · contribs), who been blocked in August. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 21:53, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:11, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruption by block evading IP sockpuppets of ThesePicklesLoveSosa (talk · contribs), who been blocked in August. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 21:54, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:11, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruption by block evading IP sockpuppets of ThesePicklesLoveSosa (talk · contribs), who been blocked in August. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 21:55, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:12, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruption by block evading IP sockpuppets of ThesePicklesLoveSosa (talk · contribs), who been blocked in August. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 21:56, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:13, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruption by block evading IP sockpuppets of ThesePicklesLoveSosa (talk · contribs), who been blocked in August. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 21:57, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:13, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruption by block evading IP sockpuppets of ThesePicklesLoveSosa (talk · contribs), who been blocked in August. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 22:00, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:14, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruption by block evading IP sockpuppets of ThesePicklesLoveSosa (talk · contribs), who been blocked in August. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 22:03, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:14, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruption by block evading IP sockpuppets of ThesePicklesLoveSosa (talk · contribs), who been blocked in August. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 22:04, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:14, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruption by block evading IP sockpuppets of ThesePicklesLoveSosa (talk · contribs), who been blocked in August. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 22:04, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:15, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruption by block evading IP sockpuppets of ThesePicklesLoveSosa (talk · contribs), who been blocked in August. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 22:07, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:15, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi Protection: Due to it's major popularity among audience IP users can do frankruft editing as happened 3 months back when it's protection expired and some IP users started adding their own cooked up story. Now it's protection has been expired. So there are chances of some IP users doing same thing again. So please protect this page.Pra2310 (talk) 00:04, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:30, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing from Nessun Burma. All have since been reverted, but disruptive editing happens on this page every once in a while. BrickMaster02 (talk) 00:43, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:16, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 115.187.57.102 (talk) 08:09, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined--Ymblanter (talk) 08:13, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Transphobic edits by IP account. Sariel Xilo (talk) 01:18, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 10:13, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 01:45, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 11:01, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism by IPs —El Millo (talk) 02:33, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Disruption not very heavy. Lectonar (talk) 11:02, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The target of Vandalism because of 2022 Philippine National Elections. More than 9 reverted edits in the last two months alone from unregistered users. Sabaybayin (talk) 03:24, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:02, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: It has been 10 years since the page has been protected and during this 10 years, less than 100 edits have been made, less than 10 edits per year.

I believe the page is generally vandal-free and stable enough to remove the protection. Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 01:50, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. This appears to have been placed under indefinite semi-protection as a result of a community discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents/La goutte de pluie (see the section: "3.5.1 Alternative: Put disputed articles on 1RR+semi"). I’m not sure if a community discussion is now needed to undo the protection. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:31, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Reply I noted that it was the result of a community discussion after I requested and waited to see any opinion. I will bring this and the other three articles to AN for request of unprotection. Thanks! --Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 01:43, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Procedural. Lectonar (talk) 11:04, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: activity has significantly decreased as relevance of the exchange in the entire space is diminished. no incentive for misinformation and the little activity the page is seeing can be administrated and reviewed easily if required 112.119.25.231 (talk) 14:44, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging the protecting administrator TonyBallioni for their input. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:50, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
fwiw, this was placed under permanent ECP under WP:GS/Crypto - David Gerard (talk) 08:17, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Lectonar (talk) 11:05, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
2409:4065:E94:415F:0:0:420B:7803 (talk) 06:51, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Page not specified. Lectonar (talk) 10:13, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 03:42, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This has redirected to Erie, PA for 15+ year. Someone thinks this is anti-Canadian. Changing IPs, ignored request to open RFD to make a case for no Primary Target MB 14:14, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. immediately after protection expired Venkat TL (talk) 14:17, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting unprotection of this page so that it can be kept up to date. The page has been fully protected for more than 10 days. I would assume that further full protection would not be helpful. Johnj1995 (talk) 15:46, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@MilborneOne: the protecting admin. El_C 11:56, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There was a rather extensive edit war in progress on the article and so far none of those participants have discussed or come to a consensus on the talk page. There is a high risk that it could start again. Your are welcome to request edits on the talk page. MilborneOne (talk) 16:45, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Lectonar (talk) 11:06, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi 97.92.69.81 (talk) 16:29, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined No real rason given. Lectonar (talk) 11:08, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi protection: Persistent Vandalism after the article was unprotected. VladimirBoys (talk) 09:15, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:40, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – long term continuous vandalism and disruptive editing on a highly viewed featured article. Wretchskull (talk) 11:26, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:44, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by changing IPs on talk page of inactive editor. Schazjmd (talk) 14:52, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:49, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing.  oncamera  (talk page) 15:02, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:46, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed Protection: High level of IP vandalism. As many of anonymous users are made unwanted edits. Ram Dhaneesh (talk) 13:34, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:59, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: On verge of joining Barcelona as coach. Traffic (and disruptive IP edits) have ramped up. Nampa DC (talk) 13:34, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator GiantSnowman. El_C 15:56, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – persistant vandalism and disruptive editing. DirkJandeGeer (talk) 13:44, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. @DirkJandeGeer: you say "temporary," I say indef. El_C 15:55, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism and sockpuppetry. seems to be a single guy using multiple accounts and messing with religion Venkat TL (talk) 14:19, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:52, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 14:48, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:57, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Sagittarius97 (talk) 14:50, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 15:51, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is consistently vandalized by anonymous IPs for political reasons. Changing far-right to far-left. CivilianArthur (talk) 16:38, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary. See log for more information. Prior to October 31, 2020, the last protection was in July 2019 and lasted for 1 year. Try pending changes. TheRafaMarc15 (talk) 09:28, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Callanecc: the protecting admin. But, TheRafaMarc15, I'm not really following the reasoning behind your request. You say See log for more information. What log? Revision history? Logs? And what is it/they're said to show? El_C 12:12, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The latter po. TheRafaMarc15 (talk) 10:30, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected. Uh, what? El_C 15:30, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because it's over 3 years since protection. TheRafaMarc15 (talk) 09:29, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Same as above. I don't see the correlation between the page having been protected for +3 years and saying that the protection is no longer necessary because of that. It may well no longer be necessary, but that rational doesn't really connect. El_C 12:18, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected. Same as above, again. El_C 15:31, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism Pyrrho the Skeptic (talk) 18:25, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 20:13, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Since September, IP editors (or more likely one editor on a dynamic IP?) have been disrupting this BLP, including unexplained removals of references, removing essential templates, breaking formatting, inserting copyright violations, and more. The editor or editors have been uncommunicative (despite talk page warnings). I'd like to request temporary semi-protection. (Alternatively, maybe a range block would be appropriate? But I don't know enough about IP ranges to say whether these 82.132 IPs are very likely the same person.) Colin M (talk) 19:13, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ToBeFree.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:13, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. Ïvana (talk) 19:59, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:14, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

06 November 2021

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:06, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive editing. - Daveout(talk) 18:10, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: by Cullen328 (talk · contribs). Less Unless (talk) 20:09, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oklahoma TV station articles

Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry Mvcg66b3r (talk) 19:52, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Some pages protected already, some pages protected additionally, but the rest:
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:45, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:45, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An editor changes the winner and calls it an unfair result despite it being official. Kante4 (talk) 20:54, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Subject of a current controversy; drive-by IPs having their fun. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 21:59, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:12, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: One unregistered user with a dynamic IP, probably to avoid being blocked (could be multiple users but considering that it's always the same edit looks like the most logical explanation) keeps deleting the image caption in the infobox for no reason. Ïvana (talk) 01:15, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 01:22, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. Griboski (talk) 23:21, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:58, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi-protection or at least Pending Changes. Persistent disruptive editing from Finland-based IP addresses and sockpuppet accounts over the past two years, which has resumed following expiry of previous protection template. Muzilon (talk) 00:38, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:07, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: One unregistered user with a dynamic IP, probably to avoid being blocked (could be multiple users but considering that it's always the same edit looks like the most logical explanation) keeps deleting the image caption in the infobox for no reason. Ïvana (talk) 01:14, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Liz. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:09, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. twotwofourtysix(My talk page and contributions) 01:46, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:20, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Two IPs from the same country have decided to have a go at removing content they don't like. M.Bitton (talk) 02:07, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:28, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of blanking, puffery and vandalism edits by IPs and an undeclared WP:COI account. See one of their edits whose edit summary states "Artist has requested for this to be removed". Shunleez (talk) 05:18, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:48, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Is related to the Arab-Israel conflict and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and so it must be given extended-confirmed protection as per WP:General sanctions as soon as possible. Dunutubble (talk) 17:50, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There has been no recent disruptive activity so the article does not need protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:45, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pyramid

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Is related to the Arab-Israel (Egypt), its related culture (Giza pyramid), and tourist destinations. So it must be given extended-confirmed protection as per WP:General sanctions as soon as possible. I believe the request is resonable so i don't want admins to reject it. 182.1.231.101 (talk) 23:03, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How is an article about pyramid-shaped structures related to the Arab-Israeli conflict?? --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:15, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:50, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 10:05, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Favonian (talk) 11:19, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IPs engaging in vandalism and adding unsourced content. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 05:47, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:50, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Engr. Smitty Werben 14:33, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Escalating, based on previous protections. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:20, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent changing of the word church to cult by ip editors, zero participation in discussion started on talk over 1 month ago. Jacona (talk) 14:51, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:10, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Of course it's protected you cement head, I just did it. Jeez, can't bots read anything these days? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:14, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Removal of reference without providing any alternate, changing the contact of the page with an explanation, hate against ahir community by discarding the history of Aphariya clan. High IP traffic Bhupinder 90 (talk) 14:45, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:09, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing from 2601:199:680:9C10:C05B:B304:51C5:18BC. BrickMaster02 (talk) 15:33, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by IP users. Flipping Switches (talk) 18:12, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:17, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

07 November 2021

Reason: High level of unconstructive edits from IP users TheHotwiki (talk) 09:17, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 22:40, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Helen(💬📖) 19:36, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – A slow but persistent stream of IPs and new editors keep blanking the LGBT section of this article. TornadoLGS (talk) 20:36, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Extremely high levels of vandalism. As rebels groups advance on the capital the vandalism will only increase further and become harder to fix. ProjectHorizons (talk) 21:20, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing – A slow but persistent stream of IPs and new editors vandalizing the reception section of this article, with poor or unexplained additions. Historyday01 (talk) 22:12, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vitaium (talk) 22:57, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: An IP user and some new users are vandalising the page according to their own wishes and so I have to fix it every day. Diptyajit (talk) 20:13, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:10, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. GiantSnowman 20:13, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:09, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Large level of vandalism, both from IP and vandal accounts. Requesting Extended-Confirmed protection. Pyramids09 (talk) 22:41, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Pyramids09, RE: WP:ECP — one step at a time. El_C 00:07, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of Vandalism present, with constant attempts to remove/add things. Noorullah21 (talk) 17:36, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:25, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Indeffed user Iyo-farm is using multiple IPs to evade their ban and edit the article. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 18:09, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:22, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Fighting over position of Jabaal Sheard. The Miami Dolphins run a 3-4 defense so Sheard would play outside linebacker if he was activated to their 53 man roster. He is currently a practice squad player. 68.234.69.29 (talk) 19:45, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I don't understand what any of that means, IP. Please present your sources on the article talk page. The WP:BURDEN is on you to attribute your claim to a reliable citation that basically spells out what you're saying. Thanks. El_C 00:16, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP range continuing to edit-war with WP:FILMPLOT-violating and otherwise poor, unexplained additions. DonIago (talk) 14:31, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:42, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – NewFan1502 under unregistered accounts keeps vandalizing it. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 00:33, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, let me write it! 😾 Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. FilmandTVFan28, prior to this request, the page has been protected 0 times, so a lengthy protection not to mention an indef one seems off. El_C 00:48, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Subject of an internet meme and thus vandalised in reference to said memes. Blake Gripling (talk) 00:58, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – bradv🍁 01:10, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The previous disruptive IP was blocked for 3 months and hours later, another IP has showed up to continue the disruption/vandalism. M.Bitton (talk) 01:05, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – bradv🍁 01:07, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: due to persistent canvassing from Twitter [13]. LondonIP (talk) 01:11, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – bradv🍁 01:14, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The fact of the article of the show has been changed instead I fixed the fake fact just now. Yoon Ezz (talk) 13:20, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Please discuss content issues on the talk page. Less Unless (talk) 22:47, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Common Vandalism seen on page by Indian nationalists. Protection requested. one recent edit done by an ip user that I reverted added: "(Hindus Are Best Muslims Are Waste)", So protection of the page would be nice please. Noorullah21 (talk) 17:38, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 00:23, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP disruption, ongoing nationality edit wars without discussion or sources. Magatta (talk) 18:55, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 00:19, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent redirect hijacking. Jalen Folf (talk) 16:37, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done but Warned. El_C 00:31, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A GOP rep voted for a Democratic bill yesterday. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 02:06, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – bradv🍁 05:03, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing anti-Israel vandalism restarted after protection expired. It's not so frequent that PC won't work. (t · c) buidhe 03:20, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – bradv🍁 05:04, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated IP vandalsim UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:39, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – bradv🍁 05:06, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing, after I explained why the IP is mistaken. Biruitorul Talk 10:22, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:46, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Highly visible page. Vitaium (talk) 10:46, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 12:35, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Extended confirmed over an edit war 2 years ago. Don't see the need for Extended-confirmed protection SuperSkaterDude45 (talk) 17:22, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging the protecting administrator CactusWriter for their input. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:49, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Unless I'm missing something, I don't see any reason that this should have been extended confirmed protection, nor do I see any reason why it should have been indefinite. It was an edit war between two IPs, so temporary semi-protection would have been plenty. I'm going to unprotect the article. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 05:17, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done By Scottywong; good unprotection. Lectonar (talk) 12:22, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing regarding current event including egregious BLP vios. GhostOfDanGurney (talk) 05:55, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - Blocked the offending IPs and will keep an eye on the situation. Fuzheado | Talk 10:42, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Tommi1986 let's talk! 12:00, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, let me write it! 😾 Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:49, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Lone-078 (talk) 12:42, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:52, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. InfiniteNexus (talk) 05:16, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 12:23, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. - AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 07:46, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 12:24, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. - SUN EYE 1 13:47, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 14:03, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I want to create a page for this law firm. It was previously SALTED due to apparent WP:COI attempts at creating the page in 2014. I contacted the protecting admin, HJ Mitchell, but they did not respond. Thanks! Marquardtika (talk) 14:39, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@HJ Mitchell: who probably just didn't see that request on their talk page. El_C 11:58, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@El C and Marquardtika: No strong feelings about this. I'd suggest creating a draft first and I'll unprotect it if the draft looks like it would survive an AfD. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:41, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Will do, thanks! Marquardtika (talk) 18:02, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not done For the moment. Procedural. Lectonar (talk) 12:23, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Eevee01(talk) 15:36, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done right now as it feels like it'd be a bit on the WP:BITE side to do so, wouldn't you agree @Dark Green Storm and RA0808:? @Eevee01: courtesy ping. El_C 00:39, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@El C I agree with you. Regards. Eevee01(talk) 04:56, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Eevee01, well, I just sprotected, so what do you/we know? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ El_C 12:36, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – See the page protection log for this article. [14] Protection ended Nov 4 after being protected for 2 years and now disruptive edits have resumed. Some1 (talk) 14:12, 7 November 2021 (UTC). Some1 (talk) 14:12, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Premature, perhaps? There have been 2 reverted edits so far, one of which was in good-faith. On the other hand, I wouldn't be surprised if the pace of vandalism picked up on an article like this. I'll leave it open in case another admin would like to weigh in. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:42, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. Looking at the protection log for this article, it has essentially been indefinitely protected since early 2016. Every time temporary protection expires, vandalism quickly returns and the article gets protected for a longer period of time. The last temporary protection lasted 2 years. Within a few days of it expiring, we've got someone trying to add images of Shrek to the article. I think it's time to accept that this article is a natural vandalism magnet, and it needs to be semi-protected indefinitely. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 16:58, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Chandua gamer (talk) 14:13, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Page not specified. Lectonar (talk) 14:48, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – long term vandalism on highly viewed article. Wretchskull (talk) 14:31, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There have been 2 reverts in November, 3 in October, and 2 in September. If we defined that amount of vandalism as "persistent and long term," nearly all of Wikipedia would be semi-protected.OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:36, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 15:29, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from IPs over the months, and when the temporary semi-protection expires, the same vandalism keeps occurring. The article needs stronger protection. ArojamDharkon (talk) 17:32, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive IPs. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 17:08, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 18:23, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 21:10, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

08 November 2021

Reason: Vandalism and suspected sock puppetry. The page is semi protected and yet there have been number of recent unnecessary changes. Acnaren (talk) 12:53, 7 November 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Bishonen (talk), SMcCandlish (talk)

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 7 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I converted the existing protection - semi-protection until next June - to EC protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:38, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant back-and-forth over past few months; many IP edits (many I suspect are the same user) removing formatting which breaks infobox. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 20:10, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 21:50, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:59, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Going to accept Draft:Father (rapper), which clearly demonstrates significance, unlike the 2015 drafts deleted under WP:A7. Salting was presumably only because of persistent recreation of the same bad draft - no AfDs or precedent established relating to notability. — Bilorv (talk) 21:51, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected clpo13(talk) 00:39, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – One IP user is intent on changing the name of the page everywhere it's used in the article, inconsistent with the page's title which, in turn, has been subjected numerous times to debate with no consensus yet for the IP user's preference. Largoplazo (talk) 21:25, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:00, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A lot of vandalism in the past day, particularly pseudo-science Pyrhan (talk) 21:39, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:19, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Sporadic IP vandalism BattleshipMan (talk) 22:15, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:22, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism since Nov 1, 2021. Cassiopeia talk 22:39, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:26, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing and vandalism. —hueman1 (talk contributions) 00:33, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 02:29, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Or maybe indefinite, even. One-year protection expired a few hours ago, and disruption has already started. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 02:12, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Drmies. Semi-protected indefinitely. clpo13(talk) 02:27, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated ethnic POVPUSH drive by edits to the lead by IPs and new accounts. Going on for quite a while now. Gotitbro (talk) 17:26, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:40, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Mattplaysthedrums (talk) 22:36, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 02:24, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent and high level of IP vandalism. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 03:25, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Consider applying escalating user-warnings on talk pages of new or ip editors when they make non-constructive edits. BusterD (talk) 03:51, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. twotwofourtysix(My talk page and contributions) 04:56, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 07:02, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 05:38, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 07:33, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism after page protection is removed Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 07:00, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 07:39, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – continued vandalism. Doug Weller talk 07:29, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 07:41, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. MPFitz1968 (talk) 07:40, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 07:43, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term disruptive editing. Citobun (talk) 04:21, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I don't see the vandalism, I see an editor making good faith edits which you repeatedly revert. Please use the talk page to discuss the issues, or warn the IP on their talk page if you think their behaviour warrants a warning. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:53, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Prevent recreation of this redirect as an article, per the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InstaShop. feminist (+) 04:43, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Please ask again if recreation does occur. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:57, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive IP editing. 2402:3A80:1A4C:4CD8:14A9:B400:204F:BC02 (talk) 06:25, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. BusterD (talk) 07:35, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 08:07, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Disagreements about when to use the serial comma are not disruptive per se. Lectonar (talk) 08:29, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent ip vandalism. Beshogur (talk) 10:49, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:23, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same pattern of disruptive editing again, a few days after the last semi-protection expired. 10mmsocket (talk) 11:29, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:20, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – mult IPs, disruptive editing. Neils51 (talk) 12:02, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:21, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting reduced level of protection: from "admins only", to: "admins and Template-writers only". This is one of 20 redirects to Template:Find sources that needed retargeting; the other 19 are done, leaving this one. If not, for some reason, please see the Edit request at Template talk:Find Mathglot (talk) 05:36, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Lectonar (talk) 11:08, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . 2405:201:1C:691D:6CFD:1A61:B0CF:C730 (talk) 07:50, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined No reason given. Lectonar (talk) 10:15, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Today's Google doodle is about the subject of this page. Pachu Kannan (talk) 10:36, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:33, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP keeps recovering recently blocked sock-puppet version. GizzyCatBella🍁 12:31, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. WP:ARBPIA. El_C 13:26, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi-protection due to proxy IP disruption. CMD (talk) 13:20, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:32, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 13:25, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:40, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DoebLoggs (talk) 10:05, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Page well watched to boot. Lectonar (talk) 10:14, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar, I just revdel'd 30 BLP violations from today alone! El_C 13:44, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism. InvalidOStalk 13:45, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 13:47, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandals appear every few days to change a Hindu goddess' name into a different one without explanation. Check the history. Semi-protection would presumably stop this. IAmNitpicking (talk) 14:40, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism by a Turkish IP. QarinahWhiteyy (talk) 11:16, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edit a week ago. Lectonar (talk) 11:59, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 11:25, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 12:25, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP Vandalism, should be protected for weeks. QarinahWhiteyy (talk) 12:04, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edit weeks ago. @QarinahWhiteyy: Please read our protection policy if you have not done so already. Lectonar (talk) 12:13, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Fake Info's, Vandalism QarinahWhiteyy (talk) 12:22, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Also see above. Lectonar (talk) 12:24, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing by IP-hopping user, see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Hong Kong. Citobun (talk) 14:45, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism QarinahWhiteyy (talk) 12:30, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 12:32, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vacant0 (talk) 12:32, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 12:41, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism in June 2021. QarinahWhiteyy (talk) 12:33, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 12:41, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Only New Page Patrollers should be editing this page, but instead we are getting repeated disruptive editing from accounts that aren't eligible to participate in the drive. (t · c) buidhe 14:45, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 16:31, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Vandalism from multiple IPs. Eevee01(talk) 16:05, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:39, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: The protection is no longer necessary because there is no disruptive editing currently. Vitaium (talk) 12:37, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This is because it is protected. Vandalism magnet; if you want changes, please make edit-requests on the appropriate talk-page. Lectonar (talk) 13:02, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because the subject has been proven to be self evident, the obvious Cultural Marxist driven Media campaign to smother Western culture with a blatant attempt to Genocide any reference to White European decendancy and replace it with Africanised or Asian figurehead or false history. An example would be :- The continual showing by various Companies that " their notion of a 'family' always consists of a mixture of black/Asian and white people, when this is not the case. Any attempt to bring this to people's attention is immediately suppressed by Cultural Marxist Media entities, all of whom support the Genocide of said European Whites.

Declined Article not specified. Lectonar (talk) 13:37, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple protections in the past. Also, there's BLP violations now. InvalidOStalk 14:15, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:53, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am requesting to edit the in order to be able to get rid of the tag above. I want to add more reference and update the content as the page is not a a good state Freddie ski (talk) 11:23, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You could make edit-requests for starters, but @ToBeFree: any thoughts? Lectonar (talk) 11:53, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Freddie ski, you can freely edit the page directly. If you saw an error message, you have not been logged in. Good thing that the protection stopped that from happening. 🙂
 Not done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:30, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:31, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove the word deceptive as it is not factual , but stating an opinion of the author. 2601:18F:801:CB20:B017:C69A:F519:785 (talk) 11:47, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Page not specified. Lectonar (talk) 11:52, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I can hazard a guess, but this would still be declined as the wording is central to the content dispute and related brigading going on at that page. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 14:04, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:31, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated Edit warring. Dunutubble (talk) 16:32, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 16:37, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP address, restoring content removed due to WP:SPS, WP:PRIMARY, requesting adequate level of protection. Echo1Charlie (talk) 16:50, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. If disruptive editing continues to happen from other IPs, then the article should be protected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 17:04, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism from IP that keeps changing. SanAnMan (talk) 16:56, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing Tammbecktalk 20:08, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 20:12, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long term vandalism by a presistent vandal. Lunacats (talk) 18:12, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 20:24, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – significant vandalism from IPs and new accounts. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:33, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 20:40, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – page protection expired yesterday and the vandalism seems to have resumed immediately. Tommi1986 let's talk! 21:03, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind Waggers protected it as I sent this request!! Stand down! Tommi1986 let's talk! 21:05, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Waggers. Favonian (talk) 21:24, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing by IP-hopping user, see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Hong Kong. Citobun (talk) 14:47, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This IP range has appeared to be shared by meatpuppets of Matthew hk (who has disputed against this and disowned them), and other unrelated good faith editors. They have also disrupted Country and involved in rallying for Matthew hk and vote-stacking in a few talk. Page protection may not be the right tool compared with a short and narrow rangeblock. 203.145.95.177 (talk) 21:46, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Present Vandalism from multiple IP Users. Swagging (talk) 19:19, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism right after protection ends. Scorpions13256 (talk) 22:22, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. clpo13(talk) 22:26, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

09 November 2021

Indefinite full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. tyler mageetalk 19:50, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The account is globally locked, so they can't use their talk page in any case, but it hasn't been edited by anyone else in almost three years, so I don't see an immediate need for protection. clpo13(talk) 20:16, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Persistent vandalism – An exceptional case: semi-protection has been ineffective at stopping article vandalism. —AFreshStart (talk) 23:49, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment That user has been given a final warning, and will be blocked if they make the edit again. Please use WP:AIV for issues with single editors. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:58, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined per above. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:16, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vitaium (talk) 02:02, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 05:44, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Per Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)/Archive_184#Should_we_use_ECP_on_templates?, we can use ECP to protect certain high-risk templates. I specifically expressed concern about use of template protection on content templates like this one, due to being overly restrictive since this one has only 246 transclusions. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 00:34, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 05:37, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Jetstreamer Talk 17:20, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:17, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism that keeps returning constantly after the article's temporary protection expires. ArojamDharkon (talk) 17:50, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 05:55, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Licorice Pizza (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection Persistent disruptive editing, continual removal of information cited with reliable sources and frequent additions of unsourced information being added. Samurai Kung fu Cowboy (talk) 23:35, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:32, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Incessant disruptive removal of nationality of the subject athlete by IPs. Requesting semi-protection. OyMosby (talk) 03:54, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:38, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 05:45, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:43, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Edit warring - see also --> Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/יניב_הורון. GizzyCatBella🍁 11:54, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 05:50, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing by IP-hopping user (see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Hong Kong). Citobun (talk) 14:40, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. The IP is willing to discuss the issues on the talk page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:12, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: need to update information in reference to orders of high court 2607:F2C0:E656:26:14D8:EA0E:B12E:DEE6 (talk) 14:47, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done See WP:EDITREQ for instructions on how to request edits to protected pages. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 05:39, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Page has been moved back and forth from draft to main page. Bombastic Brody (talk) 17:55, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:20, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Tommi1986 let's talk! 20:26, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done This was "Today's featured article" yesterday, but now it has moved off the Main page and probably no longer needs protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:27, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Socks of Sweetindian are back a month after protection expired to add the same content.[15][16][17]. - SUN EYE 1 12:37, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:16, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Holidayruin (talk) 12:47, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Holidayruin, a bit Stale (last edit was almost a week ago), but I do see the utility of long term protection nonetheless. El_C 13:11, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – whitewashing by single-purpose accounts/IPs. Kleinpecan (talk) 08:13, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 13:30, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: 2nd request: Multiple IPs and account(s) have vandalised this page. - AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 08:33, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Many revdels. El_C 13:24, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. twotwofourtysix(My talk page and contributions) 11:42, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:19, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – After last protection was over ip vandals returned again. Shadow4dark (talk) 15:03, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:15, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent removal of cited content. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 15:24, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:12, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A very controversial page, due to recent disputes I'm requesting for indefinite protection. Vacant0 (talk) 15:38, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:17, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Most of the edits here are by new users/IPs who tries to add unsourced/non-reliable info to the article. HistoryofIran (talk) 17:17, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism changing 'New York Times' to 'New Fart Times'. This has been ongoing for many years, and many blocks. As soon as the block expires, they immediately re-appear with the same "Fart" vandalism. GreenC 17:56, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've also removed the comment splitting up the phrase; that makes it harder to target this vandalism with an edit filter, which might be a better solution than indef protection. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:31, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent IP Sockpuppetry. GizzyCatBella🍁 18:06, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GABgab 18:39, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Constant disruptive editing that persists after the article's temporary semi-protection expires. In my opinion, indefinite semi-protection would be best as the same type of vandalism seems to never cease. ArojamDharkon (talk) 18:31, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – long term vandalism on popular page. Wretchskull (talk) 17:06, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. For the fundraiser's duration. El_C 19:17, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant removal of AFD template by sock accounts. Waddles 🗩 🖉 18:47, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. El_C 19:18, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – persistent disruption over days. soibangla (talk) 18:48, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 19:21, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I feel that Jake Fersko protection should be removed. Djmusic248573 (talk) 05:42, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done AFD closed on 7 October. You can work on a new article for him in your sandbox and ask here again once you have addressed the problems. Katietalk 16:21, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The definition of MGTOW is false, demeaning and needs to be corrected. 2409:4055:2:4EA5:841C:F529:EA50:AFB9 (talk) 06:00, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MGTOW is a dab page, and of the two listed there, Men Going Their Own Way is the only one that's semi-protected. I don't see unprotecting it, but El C is the one you want to talk to. Katietalk 16:27, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian (talk) 16:28, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. InvalidOStalk 16:31, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism by sockpuppets Sajaypal007 (talk) 17:24, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 17:40, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Noname JR. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 19:30, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of one month (the entire set), after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 19:44, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit warring issue between troll IPs. Possibly just a 1 or 2 socks jumping from IP to IP. Making massive, edits without discussion or against consensus Belevalo (talk) 18:18, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Every other edit is IP vandalism. Minkai(rawr!)(see where I screwed up) 18:24, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Pending changes protection put on in 2019. Article doesn't get many visits, doesn't need it anymore. Pyramids09 (talk) 18:38, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done The admin who applied the protection is deceased, so I honored this request to unprotect. It looked to me like the protection was supposed to have expired in 2020 anyway. — Maile (talk) 21:03, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism related to Scott The Woz. O.N.R. (talk) 17:08, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 18:44, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandal, adding Nazi-type vandalisms amongst other unpleasantness. Ifnord (talk) 17:46, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User and IP address repeatedly vandalising the page despite many reverts. SuperSkaterDude45 (talk) 18:05, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 20:34, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 22:00, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Please unprotection my page. 50.244.129.65 (talk) 19:18, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. — xaosflux Talk 19:35, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Should be recreated as a redirect to Sonic Frontiers. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 22:00, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done – Muboshgu (talk) 22:18, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

10 November 2021

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. RolandR (talk) 20:12, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:40, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – At least two months of unsourced edits by IPs and new accounts claiming same-sex relationships with various women. Here are five different women she's supposedly been involved with or even married to: [18] [19] [20] [21] [22]. Meters (talk) 22:45, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Apparently, pending changes does not stop people from making libelous edits. Train of Knowledge (Talk) 23:47, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, OR, and OWN. Kbabej (talk) 20:06, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ohnoitsjamie: Despite blocking an IP, there still is continued IP disruption. Is there a way to protect the page? --Kbabej (talk) 22:57, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. BrickMaster02 (talk) 20:32, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism since protection expired in May. Vandalism appears to be from one person on many IPs, but a rangeblock of 2600:1009:b140:c7c2:40aa:94c3:6a06:f01e/41 (which would seem to cover the range) appears to have collateral damage. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 23:42, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, I forgot partial blocks. A partial rangeblock might also work. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 23:43, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/MariaJaydHicky. (CC) Tbhotch 20:30, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:52, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – All articles relating to the Holocaust in Poland are required to be placed under extended-confirmed-protection as soon as possible, per Wikipedia policies, or more specifically, WP:GS. Dunutubble (talk) 02:05, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Per WP:AC/P#Extended confirmed restriction, articles may be placed under EC protection, but it is not required. In this case, this article has received a grand total of 3 edits in 2021 so far. I don't see any legitimate need for protection. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 02:46, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Not vandalized 173.168.100.26 (talk) 22:23, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's not vandalized because it's protected. This page was protected in 2009 by Firsfron, who is still active. Ask them their thoughts. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:30, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Muboshgu. I've gone ahead and unprotected the article, but I suspect it will just quickly wind up re-protected. This article received frequent drive-by additions of unsourced length numbers, replacing existing data with falsified data, while leaving the original source in place. I'm happy to give unprotection a try, though. Firsfron of Ronchester 22:45, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected For the bot. (CC) Tbhotch 05:08, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of disruptive edits by an IP; the disruptive edits typically involve amending properly sourced financial information without providing new sources, or involve deleting properly sourced financial information. The IP also seems to have amended properly sourced financial information at Barclays, Lloyds Banking Group and NatWest Group without providing new sources. I have no idea where the IP is getting their numbers from. The IP will not engage, either on their own talk page or elsewhere, and does not understand WP:HIJACK. Dormskirk (talk) 23:17, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:02, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP editors vandalizing BLP. Schazjmd (talk) 01:06, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:03, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi-protection for Continuous proxy disruption. CMD (talk) 01:48, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:06, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP and new account vandalizing the article. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 02:20, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked., hopefully this would be sufficient.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:49, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism lullabying (talk) 05:01, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 10:29, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please protect this page atleast for two weeks. — Hammad (Talk!) 08:01, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. 2 instances of disruption in the last 4 days. Lectonar (talk) 10:30, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This is a BLP and people adding unsourced material to it opens it up to vandalism. Elenatina (talk) 09:35, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, content dispute--Ymblanter (talk) 09:47, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: In the last 10 hours, the article has been the target of a huge amount of vandalism from Indonesian IPs and users. Gpmat (talk) 10:06, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

More than 100 vandalic edits (i.e. addition of blatantly fake content) within 13 hours. Vandalism is still ongoing and administrators' intervention is still needed. --Gpmat (talk) 12:59, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:29, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page has been under protection for two and a half years. It appears that the issues that led to it being placed under an extended confirmed access have been resolved and that this level of protection is no longer needed. If you don't think it is possible to remove restrictions on the page, could you consider downgrading the level of protection for the page. Bivaldian (talk) 18:41, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Anachronist: protecting admin. — Maile (talk) 21:32, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Bivaldian: The issues were "resolved" by placing the article under protection. I have reduced it to indef semi experimentally for now. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:55, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done – for the bot. Favonian (talk) 13:37, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Most edits to this page by IPs and non-confirmed users are unconstructive, but there isn't any recent specific vandal attacks. Train of Knowledge (Talk) 03:29, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, relates to ongoing criminal trial. FDW777 (talk) 07:37, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Theonewithreason (talk) 07:54, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Multiple edits incorrectly changing leadership to 'dictatorship' from both IPs and new accounts. Tomorrow and tomorrow (talk) 07:15, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 17:15, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Since November 3, there's been a high level of IP vandalism. Requesting semi-protection, at least for a few weeks. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 16:05, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. clpo13(talk) 17:20, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Folf (talk) 16:34, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because the paragraph about Rodgers making false claims is incorrect. He merely shared his opinion, he did not say anything that was untrue. 64.106.111.101 (talk) 08:02, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Insufficient information; no idea who this "Rodgers" is or in which article he is mentioned. Favonian (talk) 13:35, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 04:28, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of what I consider excessively detailed text, from dynamic IP. Dhtwiki (talk) 08:49, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: 46.125.250.29, 213.162.73.217, 213.162.73.85 etc. They are all Austrian IPs, claiming their same original research in the article of Jōmon people, and doing the Sockpuppetry.

https://iphub.info/?ip=46.125.250.29 https://iphub.info/?ip=213.162.73.217 https://iphub.info/?ip=213.162.73.85 Abooop (talk) 09:14, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Sales inflation. (CC) Tbhotch 05:06, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:22, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP subject to persistent vandalism and addition of unsourced material following newspaper reporting. Egghead06 (talk) 17:34, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistently vandalized by IPs. GPL93 (talk) 17:39, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There are good-faith IP as well, let's try 1 day first. Less Unless (talk) 19:02, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism by IPs and new accounts —El Millo (talk) 18:45, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:25, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Edit warring and persistent BLP policy violations by an IP address. - SUN EYE 1 09:12, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 14:12, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Lectonar Could you take another look at the page.- SUN EYE 1 15:44, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it's always the same IP adress. That's why AIV is the way to go; better to block an IP than to shut down the whole article. Lectonar (talk) 16:34, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant IP BLP vandalism. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 15:47, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. clpo13(talk) 17:20, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism continuing to add unsourced material to article and/or disrupt article. Kbabej (talk) 17:01, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

11 November 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. After previous range was blocked (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/174.204.70.135), user is back with another IP (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/146.129.201.71) --FMSky (talk) 19:25, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 20:49, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:4401:24A0:8093:DB9C:FC19:972F (talk) 21:09, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 21:16, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent addition of non-needed material to a dab page. Onel5969 TT me 21:44, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deor (talk) 23:13, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: slow moving edit waring, adding of unsourced claims. LakesideMinersCome Talk To Me! 19:57, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 02:10, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Ifnord (talk) 22:48, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 00:05, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism since unprotection. GhostOfDanGurney (talk) 23:19, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 00:04, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism An IP user is deliberately vandalising the page. Diptyajit (talk) 14:52, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:01, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Jcykung (talk) 19:58, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:01, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 23:25, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:06, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Right wing trolling. $chnauzer 23:51, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. clpo13(talk) 23:58, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant changing of pronouns to incorrect ones. Jurta (talk) 14:28, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 05:08, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Mobile editor(s) vandalising the notice board. GoodDay (talk) 03:41, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ongoing disruption by 2001:8004:27d range IPs twotwofourtysix(My talk page and contributions) 04:02, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 05:01, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated unexplained deletion of material by IP Mitch Ames (talk) 04:14, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 05:02, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Shadow4dark (talk) 00:56, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:13, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editor with a quick changing IP persistently removing content that they don't like. M.Bitton (talk) 02:27, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shame that the report filer is only telling their side. I am not vandalizing anything. I reverted what is clearly a POV map. Such a change like that for that ridiculous map to stay would require consensus. And what does "quick changing IP" have anything to do with this? The IP change is completely out of my control. --2605:AD80:FFF0:14EF:5111:7643:20AE:B153 (talk) 02:30, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm seeing edit warring more than vandalism. However, if the IP acknowledges that they are edit warring and using a highly dynamic IP address, then page semi-protection would be a necessary step in lieu of blocking the IP. —C.Fred (talk) 02:43, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Partial-rangeblocked for one week. OhNoitsJamie Talk 02:44, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism a day after the last protection expired. twotwofourtysix(My talk page and contributions) 03:43, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 05:13, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator MelanieN. To please the bot! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:02, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent IP adding redundant "or Universe and Meta" after the portmanteau explanation in the lead. SWinxy (talk) 20:44, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:22, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Multiple IPs attempting to add "criticism" to a BLP, sourced only to The Post Millennial (see WP:RSP#The Post Millennial). GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 04:13, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:24, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Amaury06:31, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:23, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Tanpah (talk) 12:23, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:21, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism is persistent, but somewhat slow. This might be on the edge of what would work for pending changes, and there have been days where the page has been vandalized multiple times. InvalidOStalk 12:57, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected--Ymblanter (talk) 13:19, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Amaury06:31, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:44, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated edits by IP and new accounts replacing Russian with Ukrainian and Kiev with Kyiv. The documented consensus is to use Kiev for this time period. Presumably again a social media campaign organized by one of the Ukrainian government organizations. I hope long-term pending changes would suffice. Ymblanter (talk) 10:01, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 14:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism made by other editor. The other editors deleted information with proper source provided. There is a high possible chance that other editors will conduct the vandalism again even the information were restored. WezSchultz (talk) 10:47, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 14:52, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – With few exceptions, all the edits in the past several months are vandalism. There is little to no new information on the topic. MartinezMD (talk) 13:28, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Anarchyte (talk) 14:53, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Amaury06:32, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Anarchyte (talk) 14:47, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Philippines vandals in the radio and TV field commonly revert pages redirected at AfD back to full pages, in the case of this page twice this year. As I suggested at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DYKZ, this page as well as DYKZ, DZYT, DWFJ and DWXY should be semiprotected long-term to prevent this from happening again. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 07:20, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Anarchyte (talk) 14:47, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruption after the subject was allegedly attacked at an airport recently. - SUN EYE 1 15:23, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 15:47, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The pages needs additional citations for verification, so I am willing to improve it Freddie ski (talk) 09:51, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Freddie ski: Please file your exact edit request on the talk page. Anarchyte (talk) 14:44, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Looking at the history, this page is a vandal magnet. –MJLTalk 07:26, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Vandalism is sporadic and one-off. Safe to leave unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 14:48, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism in last 24 hours Theonewithreason (talk) 08:36, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Anarchyte (talk) 14:49, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Uranium Site (talk) 17:28, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

someone needs to protect this page asap its getting out of hand!!!!! Tommi1986 let's talk! 19:31, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Barkeep49. Favonian (talk) 20:33, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

12 November 2021

Reason: Current event and recent history of vandalism 148.78.84.211 (talk) 16:52, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite semi-protection: High level of misinformation coming from IP's about the subject switching they/them pronouns and that the BLP has declared being nonbinary on her own Unnamed anon (talk) 18:12, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism resumed immediately after previous semi-protection expired. 2601:1C0:4401:24A0:A85F:679:233D:A06E (talk) 19:17, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There are multiple editors - including various socks - who have been persistently changing various dates - birthdate! in-office dates! etc. - for Arthur. I think this article needs to be put under permanent WP:SEMI editing protection - having to deal almost daily with this ongoing vandalism is getting very tiresome. Shearonink (talk) 22:03, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Blocked edit-warring IP for 48 hours. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:52, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page is not being vandalized by user Prim96 anymore since they received an IP ban. WikiEditorByUs (talk) 20:14, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – questioning the expertise of an editor of 2-edit seniority. Favonian (talk) 20:32, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse Host. I want to become a Teahouse Host. I'm prepared to assist all who need help. I will be an extraordinary helper. I just need a chance to sign up. PASTOR11 (talk) 14:48, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is not the venue to ask about that (and you have only 31 edits; Teahouse hosts are expected to have a couple orders of magnitude more edits than that). —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 19:16, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not done – per Jéské Couriano. Favonian (talk) 20:21, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Every time the protection on this page runs out a banned user uses random IP addresses to get around their ban. I would suggest a much longer protection or permanent protection. Pipesmoking Legend (talk) 16:36, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism CreativeNorth (talk) 18:08, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Was just about to log this too. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 19:56, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:19, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 18:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Widr. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:20, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – As more Bros related articles are protected, the sockpuppets move onto others. This one has been targetted quite a lot recently so would benefit from temporary protection being reinstated. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TomWatkins1970 for confirmation. 10mmsocket (talk) 19:36, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Just to add to this, in the last week two socks of this editor have been blocked for adding the same poorly sourced claim [23], [24], and today it seems we have a brand new one [25]. This editor is obsessive and doesn't care how many times they get blocked (they have over 150 blocked sock accounts on Wikipedia, and more on Commons) and will simply create another account if this current one is blocked, so page protection is really the only option. Richard3120 (talk) 19:55, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:26, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopper removing huge amounts of content with vague reasons, and persisting with it indefinitely. Kautilya3 (talk) 21:51, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Drmies. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:27, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism from IP. Xexerss (talk) 22:56, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:32, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 04:28, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:41, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continuous disruptive editing by ban evading sockpuppet using dynamic IPs - UmdP 07:34, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator David Eppstein. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:46, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article is often affected by vandalism from time to time. The current Semi-protection is short term protection until November 25, 2021. The other editors will continue to vandalism the article after the protection is over. Hence, I sincerely request to give this article an infinite term Semi-protection. WezSchultz (talk) 08:51, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Anarchyte. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:44, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism.(Request for Semi Protection) ❯❯❯Praveg A=9.8 13:33, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:17, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – last 45 edits (going back to 22 September) either by socks or cleaning up behind them. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ) 09:21, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:55, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection - article has been moved three times in less than 4 month now, without any of the movers getting prior consensus or even addressing this on the talk. Also, note that there has been an RM in September that favored the retention of the current title (for now). Colonestarrice (talk) 09:40, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected indefinitely. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:00, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandals. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 02:28, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:37, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant and repeated adjustments of exaggerated statements User034273 (talk) 04:17, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:36, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes protection: Long term disruptive editing of IPs and new users. Wxman28 (talk) 11:36, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., let us try a year first.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:39, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – AC/DS: Eastern Europe/Balkans. Of course, because of the historical and enduring conflict between Turkey and Greece on this. Persistent disruption by AC but not EC accounts. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 23:36, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., the page has never been protected before, let us start with one year semi.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:42, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:42, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There has been lots of vandalism (BLP violations) on this page recently. Hatman31 (talk) 04:03, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page is regularly subjected to vandalism. Looks like once or twice per month, at least. Raed Arafat is a Romanian public person with an immigration background holding health-related positions in the Romanian government. This makes him a target of xenophobic attacks and/or attacks from people motivated by anti-vax propaganda. Alrediph.Cephei (talk) 10:57, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 14:40, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: LTA, see Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Linde plc vandal. FDW777 (talk) 13:08, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: LTA, see Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Linde plc vandal. FDW777 (talk) 13:08, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: LTA, see Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Linde plc vandal. FDW777 (talk) 13:09, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs repeatedly vandalising or adding speculative information about possible next manager/head coach. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:05, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Engr. Smitty Werben 10:32, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:00, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 17:50, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:53, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because this contents exists in Japanese Blumeiro (talk) 11:25, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Page is not protected. Anarchyte (talk) 14:37, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Binksternet (talk) 15:39, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive and persistent IP socks UmdP 16:50, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism. I recently reverted to Chris the speller's revision from earlier this year. Lebadin (talk) 19:48, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

13 November 2021

Reason: IP Vandalism keeps occurring daily Gemini.skywalker (talk) 16:22, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 23:16, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – recent death, IPs changing date of death against what sources say. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:15, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 23:20, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There has been too much vandalism by unregistered users due to this article's content. Hextor26 (talk) 18:08, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting semi protection. Constant puppet IP vandalism. IP is edit warring removing content. This range of IP 170s constantly pops up.OyMosby (talk) 17:38, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism is removing giant text with sources and about the holocaust, like you did. I was just honest, i did not vandalize. If 400 Serbs killed in masses in a Nazi campaign of genocide against Serbs by ustashe in glina "is not porgrom" for you biased pov, much less Krnjeuša massacre is.
What you added was not sourced. What you removed, the Pogrom of Krnjeuša is literally defined a Pogrom. Calling the article “biased” in your edit diff is literally pov bias. Now stop following me and harassing me. JohnGotten. OyMosby (talk) 17:52, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Stop denying, its clearly sourced. Massacre of Krnjeuša is not literally defined a Pogrom (name of article states that) and do not have a form of pogrom, glina pogrom clearly have. I did not have pov. I dont know who is "JohnGotten". I'm just disgusted by how the hrwiki neo-Nazis have quietly infiltrated the enwiki and how they make real chauvinistic anti-semite and anti-serb edits. I will dont stop following you because you is cleary stalking me.
How am I clearly “stalking you” when you appear everywhere I go and post abusive hate comments? Deny the article stating Krnjeusa as a Pogrom all you want. You need to supply a source that states Glina was a pogrom. Stop accusing me of Holocaust denial when Glina was not involving Jewish victims. Clearly pov tactics. OyMosby (talk) 18:05, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 23:27, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Corkyn1971. References are being removed with no explanation. InvalidOStalk 18:17, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 23:29, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP address keeps adding International Men's day as a Google Doodle, even though Google has declared that they will not do it. Also jumps IP's Pyramids09 (talk) 22:43, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – If you're not aware, there's the 2021 Cricket World Cup running in the background. That's about to end, but given the large number of recent mostly unhelpful talk page comments, short-term protection would be useful. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 01:35, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 23:12, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. InvalidOStalk 12:32, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 23:14, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 16:52, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 23:18, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing.. right after previous one expired FMSky (talk) 17:26, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 23:23, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recurrent vandalism, usually from IPs but also from registered users. Due to the nature of the topic, it should likely be protected indefinitely. Akesgeroth (talk) 19:39, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 23:29, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit warring. User deletes information (citation-verified) and replaces it with (false information) texts without any citation, even though are asked to stop doing so numerous times. Jerkusla (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Warri is a city of three tribes there are dispute in warri one of the ethnic group are constantly changing and adding on sourced information. LordSnow242 (talk) 23:03, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:09, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection: - Article subject has received two death threats by IPs. Plus vandalism.BabbaQ (talk) 01:16, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:17, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Consistent IP vandalism against consensus despite several warnings. IP user has made it clear that they do not care about the warnings or reversions. – Rhain 07:00, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 08:44, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Consistent IP vandalism against consensus despite several warnings. IP user has made it clear that they do not care about the warnings or reversions. – Rhain 07:00, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 08:46, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lulusword (talk) 08:24, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 08:48, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This Mexican actress is currently suffering from ill health, and multiple IPs and unconfirmed users are posting fake news about her death. Please semi-protect for at least a couple of weeks as to prevent further vandalism. Thanks. Yoris talk! 08:37, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 08:50, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Reprehensible subject, but nevertheless the article is being repeatedly vandalised since the last lot of semi-protection expired. 10mmsocket (talk) 08:51, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 08:58, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Major changes have occurred to this article in the past month that remove much of the room for edit warring, so this page no longer needs the protection it did. Sod25 (talk) 07:13, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Anarchyte (talk) 08:41, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: otheruser provided the correct explanation and provided the correct source of information, but the user named Xakyntos continued to delete the information maliciously,in the Korean version of Wikipedia. So request protection of this page KnowledgeK (talk) 03:29, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Anarchyte (talk) 08:43, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The user provided the correct explanation and provided the correct information source (from a recognized information website in South Korea), but the user name:Xakyntos has been repeatedly deleted from the information maliciously. So request protection of this page KnowledgeK (talk) 03:30, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Anarchyte (talk) 08:58, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by multiple Ip addresses including Ip socks, requesting adequate protection. Echo1Charlie (talk) 04:46, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:31, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:03, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: In the past, multiple people have edited false information on the page regarding the closure of this plant. Needs protection to keep it in current form. Yashmbzu (talk) 06:00, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Anarchyte (talk) 08:47, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Engr. Smitty Werben 05:29, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 13:33, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. twotwofourtysix(My talk page and contributions) 12:44, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 13:41, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent edits about the knife in the car 173.168.100.26 (talk) 15:08, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 15:18, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Breaking WP:ANTAGONIST policy by IPs. Shinnosuke15, 09:27, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless (talk) 13:38, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by IP-hopping vandal claiming that Americans deserve discrimination. As the vandal has made similar edits in other articles perhaps a range block is an alternative, but I leave that decision to the admins. Sjö (talk) 09:39, 13 November 2021 (UTC) Update: I requested a range block at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Sjö (talk) 10:33, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. Dewritech (talk) 15:39, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 16:31, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by IP-hopping vandal claiming that Call-out order, changing the past winners. As the vandal has made similar edits in other articles perhaps a range block is an alternative, but I leave that decision to the admins. Thalialioo (talk) 13:20, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by IP-hopping vandal claiming that Call-out order, changing the past winners. As the vandal has made similar edits in other articles perhaps a range block is an alternative, but I leave that decision to the admins. Thalialioo (talk) 13:20, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by IP-hopping vandal claiming that Call-out order, changing the past winners. As the vandal has made similar edits in other articles perhaps a range block is an alternative, but I leave that decision to the admins. Thalialioo (talk) 13:21, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated high level vandalism by IP-hopping vandal claiming that Call-out order, changing the past winners. As the vandal has made similar edits in other articles perhaps a range block is an alternative, but I leave that decision to the admins. Thalialioo (talk) 13:21, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated high level vandalism by IP-hopping vandal claiming that Call-out order, changing the past winners. As the vandal has made similar edits in other articles perhaps a range block is an alternative, but I leave that decision to the admins. Thalialioo (talk) 13:22, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated high level vandalism by IP-hopping vandal claiming that Call-out order, changing the past winners. As the vandal has made similar edits in other articles perhaps a range block is an alternative, but I leave that decision to the admins. Thalialioo (talk) 13:22, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated high level vandalism by IP-hopping vandal claiming that Call-out order, changing the past winners. As the vandal has made similar edits in other articles perhaps a range block is an alternative, but I leave that decision to the admins. Thalialioo (talk) 13:23, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This is a page of a Texas State Representative. It is subject to a high level of incorrect or bias editing, because of his political position. TeamToddHunter (talk) 15:10, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. You appear to have a conflict of interest with this subject. The article has not been subject to vandalism, work out disagreements on the article talkpage, and please explicitly acknowledge your apparent conflict of interest, and agree to abide by Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy. 15:17, 13 November 2021 (UTC)Acroterion (talk)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. Dewritech (talk) 15:50, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by block evading IP. Please see Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Best known for IP and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Best known for IP. JimRenge (talk) 18:21, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The user is abusing process to try to gain the upper hand in an utterly ridiculous content dispute. I have removed the word "controversial". The reason could not be any clearer: Rather than describing an individual using the subjective and vague term controversial, instead give readers information about relevant controversies. This user's behaviour in response to a completely uncontroversial edit is quite ridiculous. 82.132.213.47 (talk) 18:28, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:53, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism Willondon (talk) 17:19, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There is an IP who replaced the term "government official" with "Public Servant" in the lead and has now twice restored it, including after I left a note on their Talk page [26]. Beccaynr (talk) 17:38, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 18:16, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: I know this was requested recently but the vandalism is still occuring and it is more than one user. With the kind of fanbase he has, his article is an easy target for vandalism. The vandalism had really escalated in the past day or two. Bowling is life (talk) 19:17, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And it continues, even after one user was blocked. Today, over 100 edits (including reverts), from a couple IPs and three vandalism-only accounts. Willondon (talk) 20:10, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. The article has been repeatedly protected over the past few years with vandalism always resuming shortly after protection expires. I think it's time for a long term solution. clpo13(talk) 20:15, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by IP-hopping vandal claiming that Call-out order. As the vandal has made similar edits in other articles perhaps a range block is an alternative, but I leave that decision to the admins.--Thalialioo (talk) 13:18, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 22:36, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by IP-hopping vandal claiming that Call-out order, changing the past winners. As the vandal has made similar edits in other articles perhaps a range block is an alternative, but I leave that decision to the admins. Thalialioo (talk) 13:19, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 22:37, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated high level vandalism by IP-hopping vandal claiming that Call-out order, changing the past winners. As the vandal has made similar edits in other articles perhaps a range block is an alternative, but I leave that decision to the admins. Thalialioo (talk) 13:23, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 22:39, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring. Bobherry Talk Edits 17:58, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:54, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IPs repeatedly changing the numbers and adding alliances that just don't exist. YttriumShrew (talk) 20:36, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 22:42, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Multiple unsourced attempts to add Katrina Kaif as his wife or fiancee, apparently based on social media and tabloid rumours and speculation. Meters (talk) 20:37, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 22:43, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors kept on adding unsourced content. Cassiopeia talk 22:07, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 22:45, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

14 November 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editors kept on adding unsourced content. Cassiopeia talk 22:19, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 22:56, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent adding of unsourced content (example) or removal of references (example). ―Jochem van Hees (talk) 22:33, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 22:57, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism BlameRuiner (talk) 22:47, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 22:58, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent edit warring from IP 89.116.90.29 as regards the support of the EU states by Ukraine; no effort to engage on talk (see history. Semi-protection should be enough. Szmenderowiecki (talk) 22:13, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Szmenderowiecki: I warned 89.116.90.29 (talk · contribs) at their talk—that is the first step. Let me know if problems continue. Johnuniq (talk) 22:53, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Qwerfjkltalk 23:07, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 00:39, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – edit-warring over the phrase "the pseudoscience of intelligent design". Kleinpecan (talk) 01:51, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 01:58, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Gotitbro (talk) 02:13, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 04:51, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 03:09, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 04:51, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 03:14, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 04:56, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent multiple IP vandalism. BilCat (talk) 04:11, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator C.FredMelanieN (talk) 04:53, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Apparently the school was recently beaten by Johns Creek High School and multiple IPs are crowing about it. Meters (talk) 04:22, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator MaterialscientistMelanieN (talk) 04:45, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 02:04, 14 November 2021 (UTC) 02:04, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:02, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Horn of Africa Discretionary Sanctions can apply; too many bad IP edits. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 04:37, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:11, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Discretionary Sanctions - Horn of Africa can be in effect. Repeated IP (and new user socks) editing disruptively about the groups relation to terrorism. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 04:42, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:19, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recreated the article in draft form. It is well sourced, but the page is blocked from being created because of attempts to do so in 2015. Yates is much more notable for his role at ESPN since, then. Pennsylvania2 (talk) 22:05, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:49, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – DS/HORN - many recent problematic IP edits. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 04:48, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:30, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – DS/HORN - various IP disruption. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 05:04, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:40, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Also an insult, see Dick (slang). –LaundryPizza03 (d) 06:15, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Anarchyte (talk) 10:12, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article was deleted in 2007 and WP:SALTed in 2012 because it failed WP:V at the time, with further re-creations being WP:BLP or vandalism. It has since been covered in detail by Sports Illustrated, Forbes, and International Business Times. At this point, I think it's safe to say there are enough sources for an article to be created. wL<speak·check> 19:43, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Anarchyte (talk) 10:08, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Low activity page that's been semi-protected for 10+ years. It wasn't even receiving that much vandalism in 2010, honestly. Admin who originally SP'd the page is inactive (but was notified anyway here a month ago by another user). SnowFire (talk) 01:13, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @Courcelles: Protecting administrator is not inactive. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:54, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Cwmhiraeth: Their last edit was in July and they were already notified on their talk page a month ago, as noted above. Their last period of sustained non-trivial activity was in 2018. The query was already performed, a month is plenty of time for a response. If a month isn't enough, how much is? Wait another month? A year? Even in the unlikely scenario of Courcelles returning, remembering what was going through their head in 2010, and defending the action, I would still advocate overturning it anyway. The semi-protect should never have been indefinite duration to start with (unless they didn't have timed SP in 2010? Beats me). In the unlikely event of resumed problems, we can semi-protect again. This case isn't particularly close. SnowFire (talk) 07:49, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I misread the date of their last edit as being 12 November rather than 12 July. I agree with what you say and have unprotected the article. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:47, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done - for bot. Anarchyte (talk) 10:07, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. —hueman1 (talk contributions) 05:42, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:41, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Auto confirmed users keep on adding content which violates WP:BLP. Eevee01(talk) 07:25, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:46, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:14, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: It has quite been some time that there had been sockpuppetry and the socks are also blocked, so requesting to lower or unprotect page. Itcouldbepossible (talk) 03:54, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - Only 10 days left of protection. I see no need to shorten the duration so close to its expiry. Anarchyte (talk) 10:07, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Working on the initial setup of the page Bougnole (talk) 04:54, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - the page is not protected. You are not autoconfirmed, which means you cannot create new articles. You will be able to once you have reached 10 edits and your account is 4 days old. Anarchyte (talk) 10:06, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: The protection is no longer necessary because this page is a redirect and no spam edits currently. And also this page only has 2 edits. Vitaium (talk) 12:21, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Anarchyte (talk) 13:12, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Tag-team vandalism by IP and new account - very likely the same person. 10mmsocket (talk) 10:59, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Anarchyte (talk) 11:20, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Vitaium (talk) 12:27, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Anarchyte (talk) 14:45, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please make me a host and permenant editor of wikipedia Donkeycyz (talk) 09:20, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Page not specified. Lectonar (talk) 10:37, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 07:49, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Anarchyte (talk) 14:54, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Hordes of rename enthusiasts arriving to add the new proposed name. Venkat TL (talk) 08:21, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 14:54, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring way past 3RR. Dark-World25 (talk) 14:43, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 14:56, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Uranium Site (talk) 14:49, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – recently retired. Engr. Smitty Werben 14:57, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – the topic is on headlines atm and there is some vandalism that also garners minor media attention. --► Sincerely: Solavirum 15:09, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Uranium Site (talk) 17:03, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:05, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP jumper jumping to different IPs after being blocked. Bobherry Talk Edits 17:05, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~TheresNoTime (to explain!) 17:13, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP jumper moving to different IPs after being blocked. Bobherry Talk Edits 17:06, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~TheresNoTime (to explain!) 17:12, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP jumper moving to different IPs after being blocked. Bobherry Talk Edits 17:08, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~TheresNoTime (to explain!) 17:12, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP jumper moving to different IPs after being blocked. Bobherry Talk Edits 17:09, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~TheresNoTime (to explain!) 17:12, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued addition of un-notable or unsourced content by IPs. I think PC should be applied through the end of the year. Wxman28 (talk) 14:36, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I'm not seeing many out of line edits from IPs. Not needed just yet. Anarchyte (talk) 14:53, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP jumper moving to different IPs after being blocked. Bobherry Talk Edits 17:09, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~TheresNoTime (to explain!) 17:12, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated additions of unsourced/badly sourced info by multiple registered and IP users. Abdotorg (talk) 18:21, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AzaToth 19:02, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

15 November 2021

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Multiple WP:BLPNAME and WP:BLPCRIME violations involving his daughter. Morbidthoughts (talk) 20:51, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Semi-protected for 3 weeks. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:47, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. M.Bitton (talk) 22:50, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator K6ka. Semi-protected for 2 years. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:46, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of various IP vandalism Yosemiter (talk) 05:02, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Looks on and off. Anarchyte (talk) 05:57, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 17:15, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Anarchyte (talk) 06:05, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent unsourced changes by IP and new users. Ab207 (talk) 17:17, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected until the end of the year. Anarchyte (talk) 06:08, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 17:18, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Anarchyte (talk) 06:05, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – A very long history of IP editors making up their own mnemonics and adding them to the article. A lot of cleanup is needed from the years of low-grade disruption. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 19:08, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 02:58, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Already a controversial case and sensitive topic. The page is highly likely to receive far more vandalism in the week building up to his possible execution. Inexpiable (talk) 19:19, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Anarchyte (talk) 06:05, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent changing of sourced content in lead based on personal views/original research. Hesperian Nguyen (talk) 19:51, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 02:59, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism. PieroGibson (talk) 21:37, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 02:59, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Ionmars10 (talk) 23:44, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 03:00, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Need the page protected a bit longer. As soon as the last protection ran out, the absurdities returned. The root is Johnson said something stupid (that he's 53, when he's 43) in a podcast, so IPs all over the world are changing his birthdate. We need to ride this out until that podcast fades from memory. Tarl N. (discuss) 03:18, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 06:03, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism. This page needs to be semi indefinitely or something. Everytime protection expires, IP's and unconfirmed users add vandalism or nonsense edits Kay girl 97 (talk) 04:18, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 05:59, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page has been protected two or three times already. There is an IP editor in the UK who keeps adding nonsense, does not read others' reasons for editing under the View history tab, and does not participate on the Talk page. Please protect this page indefinitely from any and all IP editing. Thank you. Posters5 (talk) 02:56, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 03:01, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Come on, the same nonsensical vandalism keeps happening! The UK IP editor(s) keep adding garbage about Black Mask and other characters being introduced into BTAS continuity when they already appeared in other comics based on BTAS. This has been happening for the past year!Posters5 (talk) 06:35, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: To prepare for and prevent high levels of edit wars and vandalism due to page just being created. SpectresWrath (talk) 03:53, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Anarchyte (talk) 05:53, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 2409:4071:D12:E654:41A6:DFA6:44FD:AB99 (talk) 05:29, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Looks manageable at the moment. Anarchyte (talk) 05:54, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. - SUN EYE 1 10:12, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 10:09, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive editing from user citing unreliable/disputable sources based on tweets and user-generated comments regarding an alleged controversy. Xexerss (talk) 07:57, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 09:22, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide Extended confirmed users protection due to high level of IP Vandalism and Unfair edits by some autoconfirmed users. Pri2000 (talk) 08:06, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:23, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Article for this recently released and highly-received video game has received a number of disruptive edits by IP editors in the past couple days. –WPA (talk) 11:01, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 11:18, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Consistent vandalism by IPs for years. I'd protect it myself but I may be considered involved as the lead article writer. Anarchyte (talk) 14:44, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:36, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent BLP vandalism by multiple IPs. Politanvm talk 13:47, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: He lost a fight against christian hammer when he was found out about doing drugs Dukeofnorthernmoor (talk) 10:53, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Please make an edit-request on the article's talk-page. Lectonar (talk) 11:07, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry and addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Recent disruption from unregistered and non-autoconfirmed users restoring poorly-sourced information after previous semi-protection expired; more context at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abbasmilani/Archive. DanCherek (talk) 13:19, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry and addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Recent disruption from unregistered and non-autoconfirmed users restoring poorly-sourced information; more context at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abbasmilani/Archive. DanCherek (talk) 13:19, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism, edit warring. My Pants Metal (talk) 14:47, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP socks of just blocked Vucien are continuing to revert editors and WP:OWN the page, semi-protection needed to stop this behavior. Ravensfire (talk) 16:50, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 17:27, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs repeatedly adding unsourced profringe material on this conspiracy theory. MrOllie (talk) 13:59, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of biased language recently by right wing editors in lead to show it radical and fundamental Smilealwayswiki (talk) 14:54, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: gerek 81.214.10.188 (talk) 14:45, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined No reason given. Lectonar (talk) 14:55, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There has been a minor outbreak of IPs (and one particularly dumb SPA trying to impersonate me) vandalising this article by fiddling with the pronouns and grammar. A period of semi-protection might persuade them to go away. DanielRigal (talk) 14:18, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~TheresNoTime (to explain!) 19:36, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 15:14, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. IPs adding personal opinions and unsourced information HelixxUnderscore (talk) 18:16, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~TheresNoTime (to explain!) 19:35, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. HelixxUnderscore (talk) 18:52, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~TheresNoTime (to explain!) 19:34, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing. Even though multiple editors reverted and warned the IP editor, they are continuing to ignore WP:FILMPLOT, WP:CENSOR and WP:DE. ภץאคгöร 19:26, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~TheresNoTime (to explain!) 19:33, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am requesting to edit the page in order to add more reliable reference links as it is stated above the page that it lacks that. Freddie ski (talk) 09:40, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian (talk) 16:07, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

16 November 2021

Reason: Persistent vandalism by an IP —El Millo (talk) 23:10, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: A proposal to unprotect the article has garnered some support on the talk page. The protecting admin has been notified. ––Formal 🐧 talk 10:29, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@NinjaRobotPirate: I could support semi, if you agree. Anarchyte (talk) 10:11, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Do what you will, but that stupid meme is probably just going to come right back. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:17, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with what NinjaRobotPirate is suggesting, namely that if someone wants to unprotect because freedom, go ahead. I don't see any useful edit requests on talk which should be a prerequisite. I will watch the article for a while because some at talk appear to not get the point of Wikipedia. Johnuniq (talk) 04:31, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined for now. Request is a bit premature. Allow the discussion on the talk page to proceed and wait for it to conclude naturally before requesting a reduction in protection here. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 00:42, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Which is apparently 100% seriousness at all times. ––FormalDude talk 00:45, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I have some edits to make using reliable sources and need to make the edits for a school project. Skalan47 (talk) 19:21, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected @Skalan47: Go for it. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 00:45, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. There has been a history of sock accounts vandalising the page. Seems like the same user has returned. 157.45.170.230 (talk) 16:20, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:35, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism over the last few weeks (most likely by the same person under different IPs) relating to a recent controversy involving the article subject. 86.20.255.109 (talk) 20:26, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above message is from Andrew Lawrence himself, who has a history of editing the article about himself.
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:46, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Loafiewa (talk) 21:33, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:48, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – ongoing IP edits introducing grammatical errors. Joeyconnick (talk) 02:52, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – ongoing IP edits introducing grammatical problems. Joeyconnick (talk) 02:54, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Large amount of section blanking, usually with no edit explanation, by anonymous IP editor. I'd recommend pending changes protection. Kalariwarrior (talk) 02:56, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 04:05, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing from 2601:199:680:9C10:12C:37FC:ECC3:CB2C and various accounts from the same IP. BrickMaster02 (talk) 22:59, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:57, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism (BLP violations) continuing after it became unprotected. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:12, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:08, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Repeated introduction of deliberate factual errors by IPs. These edits are the result of a factional political dispute that I'm familiar with (see Mises Caucus). They are unhappy their side lost, but the source makes it clear who's in charge, and the vandalism needs to stop. ― Tartan357 Talk 00:15, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:10, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:22, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Vanamonde (Talk) 05:26, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Sockpuppet persistently re-adds irrelevant categories with a consensus against adding. Link20XX (talk) 02:44, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:24, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Significant increase in vandalism in the past 24 hours, some of which was not noticed until hours later. –WPA (talk) 03:20, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:30, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Serious BLP violations: would also recommend revdel for the content removed in my most recent revert. Vanamonde (Talk) 05:24, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:22, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Arbitration enforcement. Vitaium (talk) 06:29, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a valid request, but for whatever reason I can not synchronize back move and edit protections. Could someone else have a look please?--Ymblanter (talk) 08:21, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Move protected EC-move protected; it worked fine for me. Lectonar (talk) 08:29, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary full-protection - edit-war. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 16:26, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. and User: Ohnoitsjamie is keeping an eye on the article. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:39, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 18:31, 15 November 2021 (UTC) 18:31, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only one instance of vandalism in two months. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:44, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Uness232 (talk) 23:24, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:07, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:41, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Much editing but little vandalism! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:17, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism which I anticipate will increase as the primary election approaches.Mpen320 (talk) 03:23, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. For now, not much disruption, if at all. The last IP-edit wasn't vandalism, e.g. Lectonar (talk) 07:55, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. InvalidOStalk 08:24, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last disruptive edit by IP was about 6 days ago. Lectonar (talk) 08:27, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@MneaWaeeOfficial Posted on Instagram November 15th:

Mnea Waee didn’t want to post the song “Scenes” At first but was motivated by a cause. That made her share it with the media and got over 1.1k On SoundCloud. Mnea Waee is currently at The Bahamas taking a vacation to celebrate her achievements. Grace77800 (talk) 03:23, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Page not specified. Lectonar (talk) 08:31, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated test editing by an IP hopper. Jalen Folf (talk) 03:41, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:31, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated test editing by an IP hopper. Jalen Folf (talk) 03:41, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:32, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: LTA vandal - AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 05:22, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued addition of unsourced content. SSSB (talk) 09:30, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, multiple IPs are adding unsourced, incorrect information, against a talkpage discussion and a clear note on the article about flags. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:04, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected until 1 January 2023. Anarchyte (talk) 12:30, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Subject further charged with additional rapes prompting numerous cases of vandalism and unsourced information to BLP. Egghead06 (talk) 12:31, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated financial vandalism 13 changes to false gross today Arjayay (talk) 12:48, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit warring by 83.181.79.84 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). Beshogur (talk) 11:46, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatedly moved from draft space to article space by sockpuppets. Please apply ECP protection. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:29, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 16:59, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP-hopping user is persistently removing a valid comment from the Talk page and calling it a "political attack". Please protect for a day or so. K.e.coffman (talk) 15:34, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 16:59, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: subject to heavy and persistent vandalism or violations of content policy (such as biographies of living persons, neutral point of view) Golden Boy Promotion's (talk) 17:23, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Bishonen. Favonian (talk) 17:34, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Soapwort (talk) 11:21, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected as arbitration enforcement--Ymblanter (talk) 21:06, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected as arbitration enforcement--Ymblanter (talk) 21:33, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: People are reverting passages of the article, which are based upon news article. Seems that someone is not okay with it and just reverts it back and back even though the news article is a good and reliable source. Abdul.nafk (talk) 12:17, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – On going vandalism by anon editers making sourced changes to his coaching jop. Dcheagletalkcontribs 20:24, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Drmies. Favonian (talk) 22:09, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

17 November 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Eevee01(talk) 13:02, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Less Unless (talk) 20:51, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism from IPs. Nehme1499 14:41, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. And also looks like content dispute - flags or no flags. Less Unless (talk) 20:54, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP and new user vandalism My Pants Metal (talk) 19:43, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Mojo Hand.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:13, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason:IP Vandalism and spamming regarding 2021 redistricting process. Links sourced from op-eds and express personal and political opinions, rather than facts about the individual or links to the redistricting maps in question. To ensure the integrity of the information currently displayed (particularly because this is an elected official). Pleas remove the 2021 redistricting information from the page and add appropriate protections from future occurrences. WikiNieve (talk) 19:59, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Bbb23 protected the article due to an edit war. Since then there has been productive discussion on the talk page, but more time is probably needed. Can we increase the protection period for another 1-2 week(s)? I fear the upcoming protection expiry might derail talk page discussion. VR talk 20:02, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined as premature. Bbb23 (talk) 23:06, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism by some sock IP and autoconfirmed users. Pri2000 (talk) 20:16, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent edit warring within the past 24 hours. LSGH (talk) (contributions) 03:16, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please discuss issues on the talk page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:39, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The eel hater is back. God only knows when that guy will grow up and move on. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 01:02, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Euryalus (talk) 03:20, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Protecting a template document page is stupid and we should unprotect it. Did Q28 make a mess today? 00:26, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Anarchyte (talk) 05:57, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism  Gunkarta  talk  16:54, 16 November 2021 (UTC) Intensive and persistent IP address vandalism since 16 November 2021 by 42.153.141.154, Rijal zulkurnain, 2001:d08:2284:385b:b443:7b4c:8df9:2c2c, 124.13.89.241, 2405:3800:87e:5f2c::1, 175.145.114.22, 2405:3800:87e:5f2c::1, all IP addresses are traced to either Kuala Lumpur or Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia. Gunkarta  talk  06:50, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:53, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: 2-week (?) protection recently ended, with resumption of same disruptive/incorrect edits from IPs immediately following. IPs in question (including 85.94.106.132, 78.155.32.110, and currently 95.155.57.137) all have a WHOIS geolocating to Montenegro- clearly the disruption is coming from the same person every time.

Either way, looks like another protection may be necessary. Magitroopa (talk) 18:18, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:59, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Target of today's shame-mob it would seem. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 22:47, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:09, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Same disruption after protection expired. - SUN EYE 1 15:49, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:48, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism by several users. Page was completely deleted. National championship drum and bugle corps. Please correct and protect from further vandalism. 2605:A601:AF43:BA00:9D39:1196:41C2:F7A0 (talk) 19:31, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Article was merged into List of defunct Drum Corps International member corps after a deletion discussion. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:05, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by IP editors. Beccaynr (talk) 23:45, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:16, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP is now edit warring over his filmography after repeatedly told not and even warned of ban if continued. LADY LOTUSTALK 02:26, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done IP has had final warning and can be blocked if they persist. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:24, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: high level if IP POV warring over a long period. see history. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:38, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:34, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not done I did not protect the redirect page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:35, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Eevee01(talk) 07:26, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IPs edit warring. TwoTwoHello (talk) 13:56, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 14:29, 17 November 2021 (UTC) 14:29, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. latest performance has riled up a few. Venkat TL (talk) 06:57, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Many people view this article daily. Zippy (talk) 12:56, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Highly visible page – Lots of traffic to this page. Zippy (talk) 12:59, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent vandalism. Aalaa324 (talk) 13:18, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 13:53, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting: to increase page protection
Reason: due to persistent IP disruptive edits. Shadowwarrior8 (talk) 14:39, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 14:57, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – too much vandalism by ip users. eg. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Pok%C3%A9mon_episodes_(seasons_1%E2%80%9313)&diff=1038322599&oldid=1037793005 and https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Pok%C3%A9mon_episodes_(seasons_1%E2%80%9313)&diff=1022658025&oldid=1022657846 (violation of WP:POINT). Leomk (Don't shout here, Shout here!) 07:54, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: disruptive editing, removal of sourced information. 2402:3A80:1C46:979:F45C:F187:2E1E:57F6 (talk) 15:00, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism by changing cast of IP addresses. Has increased sharply in recent days. Ken Gallager (talk) 15:26, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism coming from an IP range associated with St. Mary’s College of Maryland and another IP, possibly associated with a rival college in Virginia. Skywatcher68 (talk) 15:39, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Brookdale_Senior_Living

Reason: Protection from editing - specifically inaccurate facts. Hhunterbkd (talk) 16:03, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 18:43, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:23, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite Semi-Protection: she is a very prominent figure; big scope for vandalism Kpddg (talk) 04:59, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting permanent protection for this page for ongoing vandalism issues. Page has been vandalised/disruptively edited 20+ times in the last 10 months mainly by mobile phone IP addresses in Brazil, usually removing the same sourced content.

Page was protected for a week last month and that helped, but this is an ongoing issue. Hesperian Nguyen (talk) 20:34, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 20:39, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. This article since it is about one of the currently most popular football players in the world suffers from constant vandalism and other disruptive edits, it was recently in semi-protected status and I feel it needs to go back to this, or at least recieve pending changes protection. TylerBurden (talk) 20:45, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

18 November 2021

Reason: The JoS pages is a highly controversial organization and article that has met with various edit conflicts and vandalism over the years by various individuals whose edits are mostly reflecting by their personal opinions towards the organization for good or bad. Its original page article, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joy_of_Satan&action=history, which was brought back from deletion was given page protection but it was not included in the official article. To the least, I would like to have a temporary protection as it's currently going to be having a major revision over NPOV concerns, which will be discussed and polled in the talk page. Thank you. BlueGhast (talk) 04:38, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Use of the talk-page is highly recommended, though. Lectonar (talk) 19:57, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 04:52, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. 4 disruptive edits in the last 3 days. Lectonar (talk) 19:59, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 08:27, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 20:01, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 08:28, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last disruptive edit 3 days ago. Lectonar (talk) 20:02, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite Semi-Protection— High level of IP vandalism. There is vandalism taking place every three hours

I suppose you meant Bigg Boss (Hindi season 14); but there isn't a high level of vandalism there, and the redirect you linked to hasn't been vandalized at all. Hence, Declined Lectonar (talk) 19:56, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent removal of sourced claims. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 21:57, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several IPs making unsourced changes about subject's personal life. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 22:53, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Repeated addtion of Kate Nicholson who is a British artist & has nothing to do with Bothell. The Wikilinkis piped to "Katie Nicholson". The initial two edits contained a Rickrolling EL. All four sets of disruptive edits have been IPs. Peaceray (talk) 20:11, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term abuse, block evasion by Special:Contributions/2605:B100:300:0:0:0:0:0/41. Binksternet (talk) 00:30, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Article was protected last winter due to vandalism. The offending user was permabanned in March, and there has been no further vandalism (or edits of any other kind) to date. 71.126.141.137 (talk) 01:32, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy @Graham87:. (CC) Tbhotch 06:06, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected. Re IP: well that's not quite the case ... the vandal in question used very dynamic IP's before my protection, then subsequently created an account. They then went on to contact me off-wiki and came across as very much unrepentent about the vandalism. Having said that they haven't tried to ping me for several months now and the page isn't otherwise that active, so I've tried removing the protection. Graham87 06:35, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editors use mobile device for adding 'antagonist' term in the cast section which is against to the WP:ANTAGONIST policy. They won't get notification if I warn them. So semi-protection or at least pending changes review should be enabled. Shinnosuke15, 06:50, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:43, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: An announcement of a new recipient of this award has been made recently, but not presented yet. A number of new users and IP editors have been adding this subject to the list relentlessly, despite my repeated mentioning of the aforementioned reason. Requires page protection. Thank you! Editor5454 (talk) 07:30, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:49, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi Protection Persistent vandalism/sockpuppetry, or G5 the article to solve the problem. 110.13.42.221 (talk) 11:49, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:58, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism.

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:05, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Amigao (talk) 18:00, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:21, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Amigao (talk) 18:02, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:28, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Several days of edit-warring by IP/SPA's over the signs in a mathematical formula that can be looked up in any probability textbook. XOR'easter (talk) 18:09, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:31, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive IP editing. Citobun (talk) 06:25, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:37, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Ongoing edit war by user with IP address; I'm asking for Protection because this is a sock puppet for another editor previously banned for edit warring and who I also suspect is currently editing under several different user names. Which I believe is a violation of Wikipedia policy. Robinvp11 (talk) 12:01, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. and warn the IP on their talk page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:03, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – One of the most frequent LTA targets. Destroyeraa (Alternate account) 01:01, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Clpo13. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:26, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Resumption of name vandalism, including one instance from a non-IP account. DonIago (talk) 03:22, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The non-IPs are throw-away accounts, so semi-protection should do the job. Favonian (talk) 10:04, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: not an extremely prominent figure, and article is not properly developed Kpddg (talk) 04:39, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamaguchi先生: As protecting admin. Anarchyte (talk) 05:55, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the ping. Please note that page protection has since been removed. Will revisit if necessary. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 18:21, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already unprotected by administrator Yamaguchi先生. Favonian (talk) 09:57, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-Protection: Persistent disruptive editing by Indonesian IP hopper. Luigitehplumber (talk) 16:31, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:15, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Larry Hockett (Talk) 19:43, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Yamaguchi先生. Less Unless (talk) 11:30, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Several different ip addresses have been disruptive editing for several days now nonstop. — YoungForever(talk) 21:52, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 11:34, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Offensive name. Vitaium (talk) 07:32, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Hasn't been edited in 13 years. Absent any active vandalism/offensive conduct, protection would be pre-emptive. -- Euryalus (talk) 07:38, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP user engaged in edit war. RickyCourtney (talk) 00:49, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:22, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP user engaged in edit war. RickyCourtney (talk) 00:49, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:23, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP user engaged in edit war. RickyCourtney (talk) 00:50, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:23, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP user engaged in edit war. RickyCourtney (talk) 00:50, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:23, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP user engaged in edit war. RickyCourtney (talk) 00:50, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:24, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP user engaged in edit war. RickyCourtney (talk) 00:50, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:24, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP user engaged in edit war. RickyCourtney (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:24, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP user engaged in edit war. RickyCourtney (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:24, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There has been drama in the KPOP community concerning this group, which has led to an increase in vandalism, as well as vandalism by accounts. I believe the page was protected earlier, but it appears it still needs that protection. PoliticsIsExciting (talk) 03:25, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 12:38, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism Kzkzb (talk) 03:35, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Less Unless (talk) 12:34, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 04:09, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 12:32, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Seems to be an ongoing edit war which seems to have started 17 November. Geoff | Who, me? 18:32, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:36, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. ― Blaze The WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:06, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:37, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism continues, even though the article has been protected before. Probably we need a long-term, possibly indefinite, pending changes. Ymblanter (talk) 19:21, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 13:40, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism by multiple IPs. Changing of "academic" to "esoteric" Adakiko (talk) 10:29, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Specifically, 2003:c9:8f00::/43 for 2 weeks. Favonian (talk) 10:40, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I would like to request the permission to use AWB in order to edit the content on the Romanian wikipedia about the administrative divisions and localities of Norway, which uses redundant formats and it is out of date. DariusConopidovici (talk) 19:02, 17 November 2021 (UTC) DariusConopidovici (talk) 19:02, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Administrators on the English-language Wikipedia have no authority over the Romanian one. Favonian (talk) 09:54, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lolitart (talk) 02:59, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

should revert to this version https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pearl_River_(China)&oldid=1055312081 Lolitart (talk) 03:02, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:45, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A high level of IP vandalism (removing cited texts and references) in recent weeks. Chaipau (talk) 09:27, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A range block by Ohnoitsjamie on the IP addresses is not having its intended affect. (Special:Contributions/2409:4065:E00:7F99:9D9C:3001:E991:D65B) Chaipau (talk) 09:35, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:54, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of Vandalism of IPs adding "critical acclaim" when there is no source to back that statement up. Positive reviews is enough + source adequately. Hope someone can help. Maxwell King123321 11:19, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:49, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unconstructive edits by IPs due to recent events. Nehme1499 13:14, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:56, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: disruption by Pio tabang (talk · contribs) BnTAA (talk) 02:42, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Less Unless (talk) 11:38, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 05:52, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless (talk) 12:28, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because page was protected due to vandalism occurring 3 years ago - there have been no issues since. 103.208.69.199 (talk) 06:02, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done I chose the middle ground: downprotected to pending-changes; we will see if there is much disruption. Lectonar (talk) 14:55, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Current featured article. InvalidOStalk 14:16, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:41, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs have started playing with the accepted capitalization again. DonIago (talk) 15:08, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 16:50, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aircorn (talk) 15:35, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 16:51, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: This page was indefinitely full-protected in 2011 because it was repeatedly recreated in the period when Web 3.0 (aka the semantic web) was trendy. You can see the various AfDs for a little more history there. There's now an article on the semantic web (and this redirected there for a while) which was pretty stable. Now it is a disambiguation page thanks to a discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 10#XFDC3, and I doubt it will attract much disruption (not at the level that would require full protection). I think this protection has outlived its usefulness.

Ignore the recent entry in the protection log -- I just accidentally unprotected the page myself while trying to create this request. I have skipped requesting this change from the original protecting admin, Ruud Koot, because they haven't edited since 2018 and are no longer an admin. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 15:21, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Protection log looks peculiar now :). Lectonar (talk) 15:33, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs removing CfD template. If the category isn't to be protected, the CfD could likely be closed out at this point in any case. DonIago (talk) 14:10, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Seems to have died down; please relist if it gets problematic. Lectonar (talk) 15:03, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This redirect was created by a sock of LTA vandal Angelmunoz50 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) for the sole purpose of introducing incorrect information about a dead child. Since it can't be deleted, at least it should be protected so it does not present an easy target that is not watched by very many editors. Sjö (talk) 19:03, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Just as a general point, while I declined the speedy that was only because r3 clearly does not apply to draft to main xnrs where the titles are more or less a match (since these are sometimes retained at RFD). However if the creator has been SPI confirmed to a previously blocked sockmaster (or is just a blatant WP:DUCK) then WP:G5 would apply, and I'd have no objection to deletion. See e.g. Philippine ball as a case where an initial r3 was declined but a later g5 was acted upon. If this is a g5 I suggest salting to prevent further disruption, though there's no practical difference between that and protecting the redirect. If the sockmaster has a history of creating autoconfirmed accounts then ECP may be the better choice. Pinging Sjö so you are also aware. Due to the app I'm using to edit my IP is hopping uncontrollably all over the place so don't expect extended conversation. It's about time for me to get some shut-eye anyway so even if I had a static IP I wouldn't be able to follow up immediately. Regards, 194.186.249.130 (talk) 20:25, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) Now tagged for g5 based on the SPI; feel free to salt or recreate and protect as desired. 194.186.249.130 (talk) 20:42, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not done G5 denied by another admin, no need to protect the redirect. Lectonar (talk) 15:04, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of I.P. vandalism and ongoing harassment. KMcstevenson (talk) 14:33, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High Level IP vandalism ongoing harassment. SConner252 (talk) 14:37, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

59.115.176.75 (talk) 14:55, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Page not specified. Lectonar (talk) 15:05, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

19 November 2021

Reason: IP hopper keeps adding International Men's Day as a google doodle. Admin already blocked one IP range. Pyramids09 (talk) 19:30, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done PC protected for 3 months after this request was made. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 22:07, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article is targeted frequently by IPs Maleschreiber (talk) 16:38, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Wrong information - Clear attack on our Party and the country - As the Vice President of the Democratic Party of Socialists of Montenegro and as someone who has the permanent position in Germany I would gratly appreciate to allow us to present our Party and ideology in a correct way. We are shocked by the present information 37.24.220.2 (talk) 20:32, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Almost all edits by IPs have been vandalism for the past year The Tips of Apmh (talk) 20:33, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant vandalism by socks. MT TrainTalk 11:48, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 01:31, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Folf (talk) 15:38, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 01:36, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Spate of vandalism in last couple of hours. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:11, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 01:38, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by "new-account"-hopper. The Banner talk 18:06, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 01:44, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Currently getting vandalized with people adding "Estadio Iceteca" and changing owner to "Cyle Larin". Basically Canada played Mexico in soccer on Tuesday and the game was played in freezing cold and snowy conditions, so fans called it the Iceteca game (as a parody of the Mexican stadium which is called Estadio Azteca). Cyle Larin scored two goals to beat Mexico. Some registered users are also making the changes so maybe should be full protection as opposed to semi-protection. It's fine and probably good to mention the one-off nickname in the prose (which it is), but a few users have added it to infobox and the opening paragraph as an official name. RedPatch (talk) 18:21, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 01:47, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing Rodrigs1121 (talk) 19:48, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 01:54, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit warring by IPs and SPA's over whether he is Iranian or French. Notable for being the first Iranian to reach the elite levels in the chess world so important we sort out an acceptable description and stick with it. Direct editors to Talk page. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 22:36, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 01:57, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Extended semi-protection, proxy IP socking. CMD (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 02:05, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Multiple IP editors vandalizing BLP. Schazjmd (talk) 20:04, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:02, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and removal of sourced content. Jacob300 (talk) 22:51, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. BusterD (talk) 01:59, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping vandalism. Meters (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2601:642:4C03:23EC:A844:4947:F261:20CE (talk · contribs) blocked by BusterD. Blocked the /64 for 31 hours. BusterD (talk) 02:02, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – a number of ip addresses and (presumed) sockpuppets keep changing "burning" to "conserving" in the article lede. always forever (talk) 01:11, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:00, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Jaellee (talk) 18:06, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:37, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: One version of the flag has gained favour with the president of the country, but that does not make Macron's preferred version any more or less definitive than the version preferred by d'Estaing. Can we restrict fly-by changes until sensible discussion leads to a consensus, and possibly for a while thereafter until it is less contentious? Kevin McE (talk) 18:56, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Euryalus. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:42, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP opinion statements that have been consistently reverted Kaltenmeyer (talk) 02:05, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:51, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 02:35, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:02, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – WP:KIDSTVDATES. wizzito | say hello! 03:32, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:09, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – WP:KIDSTVDATES. wizzito | say hello! 03:33, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:12, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Breaking BLP-sensitive news. 力停 (talk) 04:19, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:25, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of persistent IP vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 04:26, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:29, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Slow motion edit warring from various IPs. tgeorgescu (talk) 06:00, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:03, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Nothing ever good comes out of IPs and newly registered accounts on this page - AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 06:05, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected--Ymblanter (talk) 08:01, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by IPs has been going on for years but has picked up recently. The page has been semi'd many times before and this is what usually happens when it expires. Can we make it indefinite this time, please?. – Joe (talk) 07:41, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 07:53, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by returned LTA troll. BilCat (talk) 02:08, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:54, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism that keeps reverting other people's edits. Zenulabidin2k (talk) 04:14, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:19, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Just one editor. 力停 (talk) 04:30, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:31, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly Visible Template. Vitaium (talk) 04:49, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:39, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Block evasion. 力停 (talk) 04:59, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:30, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: My user page about a sock, which the sock has tried deleting Arjayay (talk) 11:26, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: vandalism K5gproWiki (talk) 04:10, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Article seems to have been deleted. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:13, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Wrong information - As the Vice-president of the Democratic Party of Socialists I would greatly appreciate to get permission for editing this page Sdamjano (talk) 13:59, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi Protection', IP's have been adding Spider-Man: No Way Home to Tobey Maguire filmography Since February 2021, Can we get Tobey Maguire filmography Semi Protected for a month until Spider-Man No Way Home Comes out on December 17, 2021. Chip3004 (talk) 18:44, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:47, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Socks are removing templates from the article. Vandalism is infrequent but persistent. InvalidOStalk 13:43, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Occasional Vandalism due to the fact that it is literally called Shit (Or Shid). Not persistent annoying vandalism but should likely be semi-protected anyway. Lallint (talk) 16:31, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits since early August. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:46, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Several IP's are edit warring and removing entire sections without an explination why. SuperSkaterDude45 (talk) 19:05, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:23, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

20 November 2021

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Content removal by IP, given its a single IP the user being blocked could also work. Discussion is taking place but they're not adhering to WP:BRD and WP:STATUSQUO despite being warned in edit summaries and on the talk page. TheDoctorWho (talk) 15:23, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Guess I accidentally hit full protection in Twinkle when I meant to hit semi, just need to prevent the IP from reverting to their preferred edit while discussion is taking place. TheDoctorWho (talk) 15:25, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The IP editor has created a Talk Page discussion per TheDoctorWho's request. Furthermore, other registered users have reverted themselves in agreement with the IP editor. Page protection not required (unless TheDoctorWho starts reverting others again).Posters5 (talk) 16:32, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Request withdrawn Per the ridiculous drama this has caused leading to an ANEW report for attempting to follow simple WP:BRD, against an unexperienced editor on Wikipedia. TheDoctorWho (talk) 16:39, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor – for the bot. Favonian (talk) 20:44, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Should be protected due to IP vandalisms. Matsuzaka1923 (talk) 22:51, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 22:56, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Irwin Page

Cause of death - Sting Rayed Teczad89 (talk) 19:42, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Jokes doesn't amuse anyone. (CC) Tbhotch 19:46, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: False Informations. Matsuzaka1923 (talk) 22:31, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Page should be Protected for months or weeks, due to vandalism started in april 2021. Matsuzaka1923 (talk) 22:33, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Arjun 206.188.226.2 (talk) 19:20, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy @Scottywong: (CC) Tbhotch 19:47, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Without a decipherable reason given for why the protection level should be reduced, I don't see any reason to treat this request seriously. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 21:17, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive/ speculative editing due to ongoing captaincy changes. Spike 'em (talk) 10:52, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:13, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Should be Protected for days, due to vandalism starting in september 2021. Matsuzaka1923 (talk) 22:46, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Hasn't been edited since November 1. clpo13(talk) 22:57, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Kyle Rittenhouse verdict just came out; there have been several different IPs changing his entry on the page already. Short period of protection until everyone cools down would be helpful. Rusalkii (talk) 01:13, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 07:01, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Unregistered users continue to change the cast list to say that Olivia Wilde portrays Gozer, whereas the film's credits state it is Emma Portner that plays the role. Requesting a temporary increase in protection. giftheck (talk) 11:17, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There is also a registered user, BossCombo, created today in order to potentially evade an unregistered user lock, who is also continuously making the change despite the reversions mentioning that Portner is credited with the role and not Wilde. giftheck (talk) 11:26, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:19, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 11:23, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:22, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 11:23, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:26, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Subject has recently disappeared under questionable circumstances, so there's been a slew of edits speculating about the Chinese government killing her without sources. OhKayeSierra (talk) 12:54, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Many edits, but mostly by autoconfirmed editors, but little disruption. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:33, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Lots of IP vandalism in the past few days. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 20:26, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Clpo13. Favonian (talk) 08:35, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Another individual is trying to alter facts provided by myself and other editors throughout the years. "Angel de Amparo" is a structure created by my Grandfather, Isauro Valbuena, who has been recognized in numerous opportunities as the sole creator of the structure. Individuals related to another person who says that he is the real creator are constantly editing the article with bad intentions and without providing any valid source. I've attached pictures of a ceremony where my grandfather was recognized as the creator by the State Government, while there are also several websites that have covered the yearly 'lighting' of the structure before every Christmas and all of them refer to my grandfather, Isauro Valbuena, as the creator. Please, I'm requesting an increased level of protection or that you guys lock the article for future edits. Thank you. California30235 (talk) 03:45, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP users having an edit war. Please protect it quickly محرر البوق (talk) 21:39, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:05, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP hopper geolocating to Altamonte Springs, Florida has been repeatedly inserting WP:BLP violations ranging from adding claims not supported by the linked sources (WINK News states Oakes was actually correct while debunking the context of Oakes' claims) to outright vandalism. This may be a case of sockpuppetry by User:Keegscee, since a WP:DUCK case appeared from the same ISP and geolocation shortly before this abuse started on this article that I initiated. Therefore, I'm recommending semi-protection of this article. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages)Have a blessed day. 02:59, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PCHS-NJROTC, all the violations are from unconfirmed accounts, so WP:ECP would have no utility. El_C 10:53, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent removal of Finfinne from the infobox and lead from IP users. Ue3lman (talk) 03:02, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:46, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IPs and SPA over the past 24 hours. Generalrelative (talk) 04:30, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:44, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. IceWelder [] 14:55, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:07, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Since Template:Editnotices/Page/Quds Force prohibits IP editors from editing the page, it probably makes sense to semi-protect it to ensure that's the case. FDW777 (talk) 18:49, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:15, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – To prevent IPs from vandalising the infobox. Cipher21 (talk) 19:01, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Uh, Cipher21, are we looking at the same thing? El_C 11:20, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Editor user:Archie515 to push promotional text in coi article. Been at the board, consensus to remove, now edit warring to preserve. scope_creepTalk 23:09, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:11, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit warring. Several users constantly reverting edits trying to remove the blatant nationalistic bias from the article. The talk page contains a list of biased changed in the article made in the last month. Whatever748 (talk) 10:46, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:16, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Recently deleted BLP – This was created by a self promoting autobiographer, and the whole circumstance surrounding ity was steeped in vitriol from them. They became blocked for, among other matters, sock puppetry. There is a likelihood of that rearing its head again. IN the same manner that a block is intended to be preventative, please consider indefinite create protection for this article. One day La-Paz might be notable. At that point we can allow the article. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 11:04, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 11:13, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: high level of ip vandalsim 75.168.124.248 (talk) 04:26, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – blocking you would be a better remedy. Favonian (talk) 08:37, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppet edit warring; sock edits started on July 7th, and edit warring has been going on since November 2nd. Whisperjanes (talk) 07:15, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:30, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: no vandalism since 2013. Matsuzaka1923 (talk) 22:30, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – It's good to know that protection works. Aside from that, should a bona fide user submit a request, it will be considered. Favonian (talk) 08:28, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting: Semi-protection Reason: Persistent disruptive edits by anon IPs Eg: [28] , [29], [30], [31]. Shadowwarrior8 (talk) 14:07, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Please continue to discuss issues on the talk page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:42, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – An IP and a editor are flooding the history of the article by removing and adding plot-related content and appears to be indirect edit warring. SuperSkaterDude45 (talk) 14:25, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. and warn the participants, especially the editor, @Shikagami03:. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:56, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Serious vandalism at around 9:55 AM GMT on 20th November Zippy (talk) 09:57, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:30, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and removal of sourced content Jacob300 (talk) 19:19, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edit was 10 days ago, so Stale. El_C 11:22, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:43, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Somewhat consistent requesting of unsourced or poorly sourced content on the talk page – The semi-protection on this page is about to expire in 1 day; still seeing quite a few requests on adding poorly sourced claims about notable people with perfect pitch to the list on the talk page (especially the ones sourcing Eddie Chen with self-published YouTube videos from himself), although I think indef pending changes should be good enough as this article isn't as heavily edited as it once was, though there are still a few unsourced requests here and there. Jeuno (talk) (contribs) 06:39, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Page has been vandalized by different unconfirmed IP users. Arquenevis (talk) 10:34, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:29, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There is still a high level of IP vandalism.

The page was already protected for multiple times. The last Protection was for 1 month from July to 4th September 2021.

Since the unprotection the last 56 edits were:

  • 20 edits of reverted
  • 25 edits which were reverted
  • 10 edits which appear useful
    • 2 edits by bots

I think this page is a case of ongoing permanent IP-vandalism and I hope the page get's a permanent Protection from IP edits. 🤾‍♂️ Malo95 (talk) 17:12, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism in a short period of time by several IP editors. OceanHok (talk) 17:13, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Donnowin1 (talk) 19:00, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:07, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Jalen Folf (talk) 19:20, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:09, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of recent IP vandalism and disruptive edits to the page. TheVaughano (talk) 20:18, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:10, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page protection expired and troll is back. $chnauzer 17:58, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:02, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IceWelder [] 21:23, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:14, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Highly visible page – Page that is used many times due to it being in twinkles welcome message templates. Bobherry Talk Edits 15:58, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Anon. editors change the ethnicity from Yugoslavian to Kosovan without providing any sources, and in contradiction to the sources in the article. I've dropped a note on the latest dynamic IP range, and the article's talkpage to encourage sourcing... Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 19:01, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:37, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Benjamin112 19:20, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:35, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Qwerfjkltalk 20:21, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 20:27, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
2001:8F8:1825:13A4:4C02:AB5A:6084:B2AF (talk) 14:38, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_(soundtrack)#Soundtrack_listing

2001:8F8:1825:13A4:4C02:AB5A:6084:B2AF (talk) 14:39, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_(soundtrack)#Soundtrack_listing

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated sockery - Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Marcorubiocali. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 11:56, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • (Non-administrator comment) Just to chip in from an SPI perspective, I don't think protection would be beneficial here. The only person/people to edit the draft so far has been the person/people implicated in the SPI, and various others cleaning up their issues. As such, the draft makes a good honeytrap to keep sox out of mainspace, and there's no good-faith edits that would be interfered with by leaving it unprotected. If protected, Rubio/Goldstein will likely just game AC or create Draft:George Cervantes (matchmaker) or something like that. (My feelings on this would change if an editor in good standing were to say that they plan to make this draft publishable.) -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 18:04, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not done This page hasn't been edited in several days. With a nod towards the astute observation by User:Tamzin, we shouldn't perform this good faith request at this time. BusterD (talk) 19:37, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Persistent vandalism from IP users CaffeinAddict (talk) 17:59, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism by user Veverve Gabeedman (talk) 19:14, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Gabeedman: You should have pinged me when mentioning me here. You are attempting to WP:OWN the article in order to avoid WP:V. You have also refused to talk despite my multiple attempts, and resorted to edit war. Veverve (talk) 19:26, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Veverve: Stop improperly flagging the article for lack of inline citations. Approximately 20 inline citations have been retrieved since 1 September 2021. The article lists New Testament textual variants drawing from numerous different critical editions which are all referenced. Gabeedman (talk) 19:44, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, content dispute between two users. Please sort it out at the talk page of the article.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:36, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

21 November 2021

Reason: Repeated WP:BLP violation sourced to Twitter nonsense AndyTheGrump (talk) 21:10, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting indefinite pending changes protection of a BLP that frequently receives vandalism stretching back at least around a year. Temporary protection will not likely be suitable in this instance as new and unregistered users will likely come back to vandalise the page as the person is an active referee so will likely be involved in issues on the pitch people deem controversial beyond the immediate future and thus lead to vandalism. Helper201 (talk) 22:17, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism, e.g. diff. Semi-protection would be helpful. A. C. Santacruz Talk 22:18, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unsourced and disruptive edits by an IP. Sid95Q (talk) 22:29, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent attempts at political whitewashing by IP/SPA editors. XOR'easter (talk) 00:19, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:14, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Daniuu (talk) 00:22, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:13, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SangrurUser (talk) 02:39, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:10, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated block evasion by IPs of Caidin-Johnson. Jalen Folf (talk) 04:11, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:02, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: - IP vandalism minutes after last protection ended. Defamatory vandalism towards a dead singer.--BabbaQ (talk) 01:06, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:19, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Extended semi-protection, persistent proxy sockpuppet vandalism CMD (talk) 16:22, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:17, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Bobherry Talk Edits 03:17, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – User keeps reverting my edit with no explanation while I have provided a valid reason, and even a link to a discussion. Paul Vaurie (talk) 02:55, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 06:07, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. after the protection expired. Venkat TL (talk) 06:19, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:06, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple vandalism from various accounts. HeinzMaster (talk) 07:04, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:23, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Vacant0 (talk) 20:30, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 06:24, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Right after page protection expired, the same IP user at the same IP address again made the edits that led to the page being protected in the first place. See the talk page and Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive441#User:82.1.235.57 reported by User:Largoplazo (Result: Warning, Semi) for details. Largoplazo (talk) 04:29, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging User:EdJohnston. Largoplazo (talk) 04:30, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. We should not be protecting an article due to the actions of one user. I have given them a final warning. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:39, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. InfiniteNexus (talk) 05:28, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Four instances of vandalism in three weeks is not really enough to warrant protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:57, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – WP:EVASION by IP who already has a history of sockpuppetry. HistoryofIran (talk) 18:39, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. We should not be protecting an article due to the actions of one user. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:31, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued IP vandalism - four reverts necessary today, for example. They'll get bored eventually, but we'll probably need a week or so for that to happen. Blue Square Thing (talk) 20:17, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See below also. Now been at least ten more reverts needed. Blue Square Thing (talk) 22:05, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:20, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unconstructive edits by IPs for the past two months. Already has been temporarily protected before, twice. Requesting permanent semi protection. Thank you. shanghai.talk to me 06:38, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done There is little actual vandalism and protection would prevent the useful contributions being made by non-autoconfirmed users. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:18, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Helen(💬📖) 04:00, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:40, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism, seemed to be spurred on by Nicholas Nassim Taleb on twitter, derailing discussion, tag team behaviour. Article is heavily protected and monitored. JJNito197 (talk) 11:34, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Black Kite. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:44, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP disruptive edits. Ronherry (talk) 15:23, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:50, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Uranium Site (talk) 07:48, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:57, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing from IP user 72.69.20.132. Adding unsourced credits the day before the episode of the week airs. BrickMaster02 (talk) 02:03, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Why not contact the IP on their talk page and discuss the issue? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:29, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Full creation protection was applied because the article kept being recreated as a copyright violation in April 2018. I wish for it to be unprotected because of a promising draft at Draft:Overpaid, oversexed and over here. 15 (talk) 14:47, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined It would be helpful if the draft was reviewed, and if accepted unprotection is quickly done. Lectonar (talk) 11:03, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: it is not vandalized in a long time and I want to edit it I love penguins so much DMPenguin (talk) 22:49, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. It's not been vandalized because it is protected; until you become autoconfirmed you can make edit requests on the article's talk-page. Lectonar (talk) 11:59, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Eevee01(talk) 15:23, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: There is no need for protection because there is no longer use. Did Q28 make a mess today? 00:31, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined There is an active TfD on this right now, if it results in a keep feel free to re-request this review. — xaosflux Talk 12:59, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: No protection is necessary because the template is no longer in use. Did Q28 make a mess today? 04:27, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined There is an active TfD on this right now, if it results in a keep feel free to re-request this review. — xaosflux Talk 12:59, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Right after page protection has expired, IP continues to remove sourced content. Griboski (talk) 16:54, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Someone keeps trying to add a boyfriend to the infobox (should only include long-term life partners). One account was blocked but various IPs continue. MB 16:58, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP edit warring. Jalen Folf (talk) 19:05, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

22 November 2021

Reason: This article's edit rate may be too high for "pending changes protection". An "extended confirmed protection" may be a better fit for this BLP. — WILDSTARTALK 20:07, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sports team owner vandalism. Larry Hockett (Talk) 21:13, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent POV pushing. PuzzledvegetableIs it teatime already? 22:24, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated recent vandalism and bad faith IP/new user edits. - Syd (talk) 15:46, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of X1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. A lot of the recent vandalism is from the same range, but it was larger than I felt comfortable doing that wide a range-block on. If another admin wants to look into blocking any of the IPs or individuals, be my guest to continue this. - CorbieVreccan 00:21, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalsim. Cassiopeia talk 23:26, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 00:21, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs. Yeeno (talk) 🍁 23:50, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 00:19, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:SOCK. A large series of IP addresses which may have been used by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Flix11 have been running through the article every time this league has matches being played while there is a block in place which is indefinite. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 18:24, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Sir Sputnik. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:52, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuous unsourced changes and MoS violations over the past couple of months since last protection expired. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 20:53, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:59, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated unexplained removal of content by IP and new user Loopy30 (talk) 02:13, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:04, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuous unsourced changes made by IP's address, same violations over the past couple of months, they kept on posting unsourced edits since last protection expired yesterday. Thalialioo (talk) 09:58, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:12, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sock vandalism resumed after previous protection expired. TornadoLGS (talk) 00:49, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Grizzler3887 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) looks to have been the problem, and is now indef-blocked. You don't think this will take care of it? - CorbieVreccan 02:25, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I see the other user I'm assuming they're a sock of. I'd suggest tagging the socks and starting a drawer if the pattern is as clear as it's looking to me. If you think it would be horrible to let another sock or so show up, the article could be semi-ed. But the other approach would be to leave it for a bit, to catch them socking again so there's no doubt who they are. - CorbieVreccan 02:31, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Never mind. I looked back further and we've got three now. Bag 'em and Tag 'em:
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Repeating same length as previous protection. - CorbieVreccan 02:36, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Editor user:Sobai Naphlang is edit warring to keep this page that was rejected at Afc. The page was copied out of afc over the redirect. I reviewed the page, restore it, as it wasn't sourced. They're still edit warring. Also copied a large copyright text during the last iteration. scope_creepTalk 13:41, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:22, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi-protection: Persistent ip vandalism. Beshogur (talk) 14:44, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined It does not appear to be vandalism to me. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:31, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism - new accounts, not IP. PohranicniStraze (talk) 05:08, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Jakarta GOAT vandal is back at it, multiple times over the past 50 or so hours. IP user has been reported at WP:AIV. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 02:08, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. El_C 15:15, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of disruptive edits and vandalism. Love of Corey (talk) 02:44, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator EvergreenFir. For the bot. El_C 15:07, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 02:49, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. El_C 15:08, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism from multiple people after Stewart got into a scuffle with LeBron James. Swagging (talk) 02:54, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. El_C 15:14, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 04:36, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Acroterion. El_C 15:13, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Still a high level of bad edits by IPs and SPAs, edit warring over nationality description, adding unofficial ratings to the Infobox despite explicit notes asking not to do this, and ignoring talk page discussion. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 06:29, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:12, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. ––FormalDude talk 00:26, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:21, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Crypto.en (talk) 13:06, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Having to roll back a lot of vandalism. This should subside in a few weeks. Nemov (talk) 15:12, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. User_talk:Valereee#The_Wheel_of_Time! El_C 15:24, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent redirect hijacking by IP hopper from Serbia. Jalen Folf (talk) 14:03, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 17:18, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Shamita Shetty was recently protected over repeated addition of boyfriend Raqesh Bapat, now she is being added to this one. MB 17:08, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:BALKANS. Nearly a year of IPs attempting to change the number of speakers, despite the source provided saying otherwise. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 17:18, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. After recent news involving the subject the article constantly suffers unsourced and unconstructive edits. TylerBurden (talk) 12:48, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Ronherry (talk) 14:14, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP unconstructive edits Kaltenmeyer (talk) 17:43, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Compared with the following Japanese IUT page, the source is uncertain, and the protection is in place with the differences written. The editorial board and its meetings are held at a Japanese university, and there is a lack of official information from that source. https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%AE%87%E5%AE%99%E9%9A%9B%E3%82%BF%E3%82%A4%E3%83%92%E3%83%9F%E3%83%A5%E3%83%A9%E3%83%BC%E7%90%86%E8%AB%96 2001:240:29E7:DA00:7C86:D435:E2B7:5A6A (talk) 06:56, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected. Not really an unprotection request. Use the article talk page (Talk:Inter-universal Teichmüller theory) or the edit request feature for any proposals or concerns. El_C 15:00, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . 45.41.183.18 (talk) 11:51, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marjorie_Taylor_Greene?wprov=sfla1

This Wikipedia Profile is Nothing More Than a Political Hit Piece and does not comply with accuracy or guidelines set forth by Wikipedia.

Wikipedia is supposed to be solely based on unbiased, factual description and evidence without opinion. This Wikipedia Profile is in gross violation of multiple false light, unfounded and unsubstantiated prejudicial and biased statements.

As a supporter of Wikipedia and Jimmy Wales, I find this a horrendous entry that has no place within Wikipedia. I am not party affiliated as an Independent, nor do I know Ms. Marjorie Taylor Greene.

What I do know is defamation of character, false light of fact, libel and slander ARE NOT protected under the 1st Amendment and expose those violating these US Constitutional Rights expose themselves to great legal and financial risk.

This complete profile should be removed immediately until it can be rewritten and edited to include only factual evidence with supporting links and source information verified.

Save opinion for social media and editorial and opinion pages of news media and entertainment. Let's Keep Wikipedia FACTUAL so it can remain a source of information to educate and increase knowledge globally.

Not unprotected. Not really an unprotection request. Contact legal@wikimedia.org for any legal concerns or queries. El_C 14:58, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Jumping IP adding unsourced content. One IP has been blocked already 2600:1004:b15c:948:b494:9af0:2ba:46ad (talk · contribs · WHOIS). - FlightTime (open channel) 03:04, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 15:14, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Persistent Section Blanking Zippy (talk) 06:45, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 15:10, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page appears to be prematurely locked, and has a number of errors or misleading statements that could have been corrected earlier. Ioctaptceb (talk) 20:43, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy @Samsara:. (CC) Tbhotch 06:07, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected. With almost 20 protections previously applied to this page, the reasoning isn't a substantive enough and ignores this fact. In any case, use the article talk page (Talk:Victorian era) or the edit request feature for any proposals or concerns. El_C 15:05, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Mistakes 102.190.250.62 (talk) 15:12, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected. Not really an unprotection request. Use the article talk page (Talk:Somaya El Khashab) or the edit requet feature for any proposals or concerns. El_C 15:18, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Many vandalism edits by IP editors since November 21, 2021. Cassiopeia talk 08:29, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 18:46, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Increasing and frequent attempts by multiple accounts to change "Karate" to "Taekwondo" on this article. Very difficult to continue to revert. Pyrrho the Skeptic (talk) 15:54, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Uranium Site (talk) 18:33, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:39, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:BALKANS, persistent WP:BLP violations. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 18:56, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Also a logged arbitration enforcement action. -- LuK3 (Talk) 19:13, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism magnet. FDW777 (talk) 19:08, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 19:44, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection - IP vandalism.--BabbaQ (talk) 19:33, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 19:46, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing, i.e. continued attempts to add disputed content during a pending RfC after previous page protection [32] expired [33]. Beccaynr (talk) 18:38, 18 November 2021 (UTC) This issue is also discussed at an open ANI complaint. Beccaynr (talk) 19:25, 18 November 2021 (UTC) The situation is continuing, e.g. [34], [35], [36], [37]. Beccaynr (talk) 15:35, 20 November 2021 (UTC) - updated to add diff - Beccaynr (talk) 15:46, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 18:04, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Loafiewa (talk) 20:55, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 20:14, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It's that time of year again, a short protection until the holiday has passed appears appropriate. Ifnord (talk) 19:44, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 19:51, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Enormous number of non-helpful IP edits in the past ten days; all have been reverted; may not strictly be vandalism, but certainly disruptive. Happy days ~ LindsayHello 18:11, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism for biographical article with in the current news Seaweed (talk) 20:40, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Permanent semi-protection: Continuous IP vandalism. Resumes after temporary protection is lifted. Msw1002 (talk) 21:32, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

23 November 2021

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anonymous editors from a wide range of IP addresses have repeatedly removed factual, sourced information (his birth date) from this page without explanation. This page was pending changes protected in January 2016 for the same reason. Arbor to SJ (talk) 03:53, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I don't think those sources are sufficient per WP:BLP to source a birth date. One is behind a paywall, the other does not include a birthdate. OhNoitsJamie Talk 04:03, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 20:11, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Unsourced changes by IP users Laxmanthaletto (talk) 13:01, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 20:11, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Zippy (talk) 18:30, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Same IP the last 2 days. Lectonar (talk) 21:23, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. This page had been edited an unsourced edits, have been notified and warns of several IP user that start with 115 but never stopping disruptive edits behavior in Soekarno–Hatta International Airport. Also, this user is a possible sock of User:Jellywings19. Cornerstone2.0 (talk) 11:57, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Suck it (from beyond the grave), Suharto! El_C 01:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism on a BLP began again immediately after the previous protection was lifted. Pointing out that I am a COI/Paid editor. Amandaatcitadel (talk) 16:10, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. That is quite the gaze, Amandaatcitadel. El_C 01:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism and spamming regarding 2021 redistricting process. Links sourced from op-eds and express personal and political opinions, rather than facts about the individual or links to the redistricting maps in question. To ensure the integrity of the information currently displayed (particularly because this is an elected official). Pleas remove the 2021 redistricting information from the page and add appropriate protections from future occurrences. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiNieve (talkcontribs) 20:28, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – BLP vios, racist trolling, etc. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 23:13, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Page has an extremely long track record of vandalism and unsourced modifications by IPs and new accounts. Pending Changes should be instituted to prevent such changes from going live without approval. AlexEng(TALK) 00:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs adding unsourced content, within a few days of previous protection expiring. rchard2scout (talk) 14:08, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. rchard2scout, there's only been one previous protection, so not a good candidate for indef protection. El_C 01:14, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Two IP editors, I think there is a couple more but inactive, edit warring to add unsuitable, badly sourced content into BLP lede. Part promo I think. scope_creepTalk 19:05, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Page deleted. El_C 01:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: In the protection log in this page, there is no reason for the full protection. The protection is also unnecessary because it has been protected for a long time and no disruptive editing currently. Vitaium (talk) 23:46, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This page hasn't had any problem edits because it is protected - for some reason it ends up getting targeted by low-skill hackers and crackers with mis-configured tools. Should you create a draft that is ready to replace this redirect, will revisit. — xaosflux Talk 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent edit from IP 2405:9800:BA20:EA4D:AD0D:E499:2DB4:44BF even after explained the reasons how their edits are wrong and they even "challenge" me to keep edit war. You cand find it on my Talk Page. I'll revert back to the right content after the article locked to avoid flooding on the article history. — Yolo4A4Lo (talk) 01:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism by User:YesSimon TheXuitts (talk) 03:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 08:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IanDBeacon (talk) 06:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Current speculation about this football manager is attracting a lot of vandalism and disruptive edits. TylerBurden (talk) 13:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated (6 times so far) unexplained change of a name by different IPs. Beevil (talk) 13:17, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuous unsourced changes made by IP's address, same violations over the past couple of months, they kept on posting unsourced edits since last protection expired yesterday. Thalialioo (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:17, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Some users are erasing all the edits of the page and are putting in fake news especially on housemates' eviction. Nikita Bhamidipati (talk) 18:51, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated deletion of content within a short period by three editors very likely to be the same person. Temporary protection might see this person get bored and go back to their other mindless pursuits. 10mmsocket (talk) 09:56, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:31, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Target of Archery just re-confirmed with RM (see TP). MB 02:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring between the user AndrewGamerGL (who also attacks users) and various IP users over box office figures. Would prefer ECP or semi in this case but the only request for edit warring I could find was full protection. wizzito | say hello! 05:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of BLP vandalism by anons regarding his comments on Kyle Rittenhouse Adakiko (talk) 06:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been repeatedly subjected to open vandalism pushing various POVs/propaganda, and while there are honest editors who work to keep it in line, it is difficult to work on and keep this article stable given the constant recurrence of vandals. I doubt that temporary protection will suffice, as this has been and will remain a sensitive issue to various communities. ➤ Zᴇᴇx.ʀɪᴄᴇ ✪ (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 13:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 15:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs and registered users constantly adding unsourced information. Xclusivzik (talk) 19:43, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 16:16, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Jumping IP insist on calling them a "boy band" (latest edit) for the last two or three days, don't seem their going to let up. - FlightTime (open channel) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected By Jamie. -- ferret (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Tayi Arajakate Talk 08:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 16:27, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: . There seems to currently be an edit war ongoing on this page with information being repeatedly removed and re-added2600:1008:B0D5:1A7A:596E:7E94:D16:8ACD (talk) 15:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SSSB (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 16:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A single user (initially logged in, but now IP) is continually adding unsourced and inaccurate information to the infobox. They are pulling the info from an unofficial version of Slackware called Slackware Live. I've used edit messages, their talk page, and even an email to try and correct them. They refuse to listen to any of it and continue to change the infobox to incorrect info. I'm requesting page protection and a revert to this version (I didn't want to continue edit warring). Thanks! Bassmadrigal (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 16:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 16:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Please see previous versions. Itcouldbepossible (talk) 12:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism & protect indefinitely. Annamargarita0 (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:08, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP disruption. Please note that I already semi'd the article, but by accident--I must have clicked the wrong button in the pull-down menu when I was trying to place a request here. I'd appreciate it if one of you would look over the history and take over the protection--or unprotect it, if you think that's the right thing to do. I see that Clpo13 has already proxy-blocked the most disruptive IP (and 206.62.177.202), and that EvergreenFir has blocked 162.211.34.180. Still, I've edited the article, so I shouldn't have protected it. Drmies (talk) 17:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent subject of an LTA. Sdrqaz (talk) 17:08, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated unexplained maintenance tag removal. Article has already been protected twice due to this. Link20XX (talk) 16:05, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, stale. Apologies for not reacting on time.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:18, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Shritwod (talk) 11:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Non-consensual edits by anonymous users using changing IPv6 addresses from September 2021. The edits are not backed by sources and the source requests are ignored. DestructibleTimes (talk) 17:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP reversions of sourced allegations. Seasider53 (talk) 17:14, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent edit warring against consensus by IP user. BilCat (talk) 03:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – More IP vandalism. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 04:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Qwerfjkltalk 17:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 17:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism/block evasion. Multiple IPs spouting nonsense BLP violations, almost certainly the same person. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 18:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Users were removing large amounts of content. Faster than Thunder (talk) 17:16, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I don't see any evidence of an edit war, there's no reverts nor large amounts of content removed. -- ferret (talk) 16:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism occurring in the box office section for this film. SP013 (talk) 17:26, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I see patrollers reverting IP edits without explaination while the IPs are leaving comments and edit summaries, and their edits appear to be good faith and valid. Perhaps you can better explain your unexplained reverts. -- ferret (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Extended confirmed user edit warred. Faster than Thunder (talk) 17:28, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined An editor is adding unsourced content. Another editor reverted and warned them. Does not warrant protection. -- ferret (talk) 16:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: stop edit warring between multiple users and posting of inaccurate information 40.135.198.227 (talk) 21:42, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. -- ferret (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:57, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. A single IP was involved and is pblocked from the article. -- ferret (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism. Unauthorized reversions and merges. Argonne was one of 13 founding corps of Drum Corps International and has an incredible amount of history in it's references. The reasons for revisions and merges are very weak and contain no substantative reasonable information for merges. 2605:A601:AF43:BA00:2CFC:ED95:A854:C3F2 (talk) 00:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done No vandalism. Reporter has an apparent COI of interest with the topic and is being discussed at ANI. -- ferret (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. ––FormalDude talk 07:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done There appears to have only been one recent edit by a sock in two months, and that sock is now blocked. -- ferret (talk) 16:23, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent edit warring by User:Ceedub88, who has been disruptive on multiple occasions and was recently given a block warning. Blackjays1 (talk) 09:26, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. If user continues following their final warning. -- ferret (talk) 16:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: - disruptive editing by IP.--BabbaQ (talk) 10:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Not seeing disruption there; they have a valid point regarding the source. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:23, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Even if the IP was wrong or disruptive, two edits you did not even revert does not warrant protection. -- ferret (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent edit-warring by several editors and IP users over the series' reception. Areaseven (talk) 10:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm not going to decline this yet, for a second opinion, but I'm not seeing any vandalism, at least not enough to warrant protection. It's very clearly under heavy traffic but I'm not seeing bad faith disruption. -- ferret (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. I agree; article just gets edited extensively. Lectonar (talk) 17:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: It is in a very valuable state and a increasingly a target of psychiatric legal teams which alter tonality and direct the reading experience. (POV usually is" psychiatry is a natural science ") This hurts a large amount of people who desperatly need to know the truth about what they are taking. It is our responsibility to uphold the hipocratic oath and not work towards an interesst of protecting "compliance". This was and always will be historically been introduced as an alternative to regular lobotomys and the same class of drug will always remain the same class of drug.

I hope you understand we need a proper biochemist on this site or however you handle this, this is a cornerstone of public perception and a reason for why informed consent is replaced by gaslighting and avoiding legal speech. DrBoller (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This nonsensical request is made by a user with the sole interest of pushing their anti-psychiatry agenda, the only reason one might want to protect the page for a while is because of them.--Megaman en m (talk) 16:15, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 16:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism picked up again shortly after previous protection expired. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 19:31, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 19:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. TornadoLGS (talk) 18:41, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. TornadoLGS (talk) 18:41, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. TornadoLGS (talk) 18:41, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. (CC) Tbhotch 19:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Regular IP vandalism. Seasider53 (talk) 21:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing and vandalism from IP editors. In particular, persistent changing of "British" to "Scottish" despite the note and FAQ on talk page as determined by editor consensus on the page.  Spy-cicle💥  Talk? 22:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Schazjmd (talk) 22:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 22:16, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

24 November 2021

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/MariaJaydHicky. (CC) Tbhotch 20:08, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: incorrect information being put in by other users Armandoperezz (talk) 20:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, it is not incorrect. As others have tried to point out to you, "Nominated" is used on Wikipedia if someone is nominated and lost, while "pending" means results are pending. As the Grammy nominations were announced today, and the ceremony is in another few months, results are pending. $chnauzer 21:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting semi-protection. This article has been getting a high volume of vandalism -- recently, and also sustained over a long period of time. I would ask that whoever looks at this request check the protection log for the article, and consider adding semi-protection permanently. But at this point I'll take what I can get. Thanks. Mudwater (Talk) 23:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP and new editors vandalizing BLP. Schazjmd (talk) 00:58, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Previous protection just recently expired. clpo13(talk) 01:23, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent WP:BLP violations. FDW777 (talk) 15:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:54, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Moderate level of IP vandalism. L33tm4n (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 06:05, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 04:29, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Anarchyte (talk) 06:03, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. TylerBurden (talk) 12:42, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:45, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent removal of the word pseudoscience. Kleinpecan (talk) 12:54, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent unsourced additions, which do not seem to be getting stopped by the PC. Most of the recent edit history is reverts of such disruption. Long-term SP probably required at this point. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 13:32, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. twotwofourtysix(My talk page and contributions) 13:44, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:30, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism by IP hopper, same one who keeps vandalizing Olympus Has Fallen. BattleshipMan (talk) 15:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:32, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page is edited by non-autoconfirmed users on an almost daily basis; all these edits are routinely getting reverted. The last non-reverted IP edit is from 22 August, and this is the only one since at least March (I was too lazy to check further back). The topic is under Eastern Europe discretionary sanctions, and I think we are totally ready for the full semi-protection. Ymblanter (talk) 13:05, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection – Recent WP:BLP violations, as per Talk page consensus on the subject. --IJBall (contribstalk) 06:56, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism, should be protected for weeks. LaosWrotten (talk) 10:46, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – OP blocked as sock of User:Isupportkimilsung. Favonian (talk) 12:55, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Non ecp editor repeatedly adding deprecated material and ignoring talk page requests to desist. Selfstudier (talk) 11:16, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 12:52, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:52, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism in October. LaosWrotten (talk) 11:38, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection., there is no recent vandalism, and I do not see shy protection is currently needed.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:46, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Some blocked it again for no reason. 213.107.66.214 (talk) 06:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Bad faith request. Favonian (talk) 13:00, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: No Vandalism since 2013, i think its been a long time. LaosWrotten (talk) 11:36, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – OP blocked as sock of User:Isupportkimilsung. Favonian (talk) 12:54, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent Vandalism. Anl80 (talk) 13:07, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Please protect talk page. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Both the article and its talk page were protected by Zzuuzz. clpo13(talk) 17:24, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Talk page needs protection, significant IP disruption. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator zzuuzz. Favonian (talk) 17:44, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vacant0 (talk) 09:26, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: He is an MLA. I wish no one could edit it. Only the one who sends the request can edit it. Who knows the information Pari Panwar (talk) 14:22, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated IP vandalism PepperBeast (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism/trolling/attacking. Due to a recent personal event, people are editing this article with bogus/inflammatory/rude commentary. It looks like all the edits were reversed, but the article should be locked until "this" dies down. Thank you. Rls231 Rls231 (talk) 17:47, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP user continuously removes band member. Information is factual, with member's name and association with the band appearing in many sources and photos online. Appears to be from the band's local area. Hsxeric (talk) 00:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Can you produce one of those sources? I couldn't find one. OhNoitsJamie Talk 02:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Essentially a problem of sourcing. Lectonar (talk) 16:13, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 15:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Has died down; please relist if it picks up. Lectonar (talk) 16:14, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – This might be early for this, but there has been some changing of the date of death in recent edits by IPs. This has been an on-going dispute based simply on the supposed picture of his gravestone, which was uploaded to an unreliable source, FindAGrave.com. MPFitz1968 (talk) 18:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. As you say: it's about the source(s). Lectonar (talk) 16:15, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism Skyerise (talk) 21:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 16:15, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In the section "Charges", change

Rittenhouse said he purchased the AR-15 rifle

to

Rittenhouse said he arranged for the purchase of the AR-15 rifle

It is extremely important to be clear on this point. Purchasing the rifle himself would have been illegal, and the case revolved at least in part around the legality of Rittenhouse having it on him in the first place. Both cited sources agree (with the established fact, also mentioned earlier in the article) that the gun was purchased by an adult on Rittenhouse's behalf.

174.93.70.56 (talk) 14:07, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Please uss edit requests on the pertaining talk-page. Lectonar (talk) 16:16, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rittenhouse never ran towards Rosenbaum. This is publicly available knowledge. The page should say "causing Rittenhouse to run away from Rosenbaum". Rosenbaum was the aggressor. It is misinformation to suggest otherwise. 207.195.238.242 (talk) 09:57, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Page not speicified. Lectonar (talk) 16:16, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Indiphile99 (talk) 06:58, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Page not speicified. Lectonar (talk) 16:17, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalisms. tgeorgescu (talk) 14:48, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 16:27, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: People are always editing this page which is very annoying. This page is about the game Counter-Strike which is for bulgarian audience and they keep editing the page. Can you please lock the page, so no one can edit it? Powerzz (talk) 15:33, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Powerzz: this is enwiki, you should put this request on bgwiki. Stang 15:35, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Wrong Wikipedia for the request. Lectonar (talk) 16:25, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. MajorSurenderDahiya (talk) 15:51, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Page not specified. Lectonar (talk) 16:25, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP Vandalism, appears to be prank-based. Same "prank" edits tried a few months apart, combined with overtly dishonest edit summaries, suggesting vandals intend to persist in their attempts. Legitimus (talk) 16:23, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 16:27, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: The protection of this page is not necessary because this page is not a template but a redirect. Vitaium (talk) 10:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. The reason given by the op is not a valid reason for unprotection - high risk redirects can be protected to prevent vandalism. This redirect has over 6,000 transculusions, so should remain protected to prevent template vandalism. 163.1.15.238 (talk) 14:44, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined I also disagree with the OP; see above for explanation Lectonar (talk) 16:20, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. There is a valid reason for protection. But considering that the author is an IP currently and the account they were on only had 5 or so edits, I think full protection is a bit overkill here. Justarandomamerican (talk) If you're here to build a encyclopedia, have a nice day doing so! 16:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The redirect has been fully protected, and rightly so. Lectonar (talk) 16:19, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: User account Iguanadude626 and other IPs keep removing details of the Spider-Man game for not known reasons. Protect it NSAandGCHQ (talk) 19:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:03, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Mostly good faith but misguided edits by people who think that being elected means that you immediately take office. Löfven is still PM since Andersson has not taken office yet, per the Swedish constitution. Sjö (talk) 18:48, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. The currently fast-moving news story here should have settled in a few days, surely. Bishonen | tålk 20:02, 24 November 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Mostly good faith but misguided edits by editors who do not understand the difference between being elected and taking office. Sjö (talk) 19:50, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. The currently fast-moving news story here should have settled in a few days, surely. Bishonen | tålk 20:00, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nehme1499 22:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:05, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Tayi Arajakate Talk 17:33, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 17:36, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please add my name to the list of enabled users : "spharish", to the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPageJSON page Spharish (talk) 04:42, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – According to the instructions, Users with under 250 non-automated mainspace edits or 500 total mainspace edits are rarely approved. Your edit count is currently 40, so you'll need more experience. Favonian (talk) 18:19, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias (T)(C) 21:40, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – They're back at it again. —hueman1 (talk contributions) 00:25, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias (T)(C) 21:46, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anshuman Tiwari (musician) protection this page Coolblack4 (talk) 14:32, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Page not specified. Lectonar (talk) 16:17, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This is also not the venue to request protection; ask at /Increase instead. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 18:37, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Constant additions of unsourced surnames from IPs over the last few weeks. – DarkGlow00:35, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias (T)(C) 22:34, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Constant unsourced additions from IP editors over the last few weeks. – DarkGlow00:37, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias (T)(C) 22:33, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent edit warring from an IP editor. EDM fan 2 (talk) 19:20, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Specifically, 2407:7000:9c8b:7d00::/64 blocked from editing the article for a week. Favonian (talk) 19:35, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

25 November 2021

Reason: Αλλοίωση της βασικής δομής της σελίδες από άλλους χρήστες. Ngtercc (talk) 22:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:03, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. M.Bitton (talk) 23:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:10, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Request long-term semi-protection or ECP protection, due to repeated re-creation with inadequate sourcing and information. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:55, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. — Maile (talk) 22:00, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I can tell, I protected the page (as linked above) from creation. There does also seem to be Draft:Wolf's Fang Runway, which was declined by Dan arndt — Maile (talk) 23:03, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:55, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Repeated vandalism, re-introduction of poor quality sources which are likely non-RS, and POV editing, from a variety of disruptive new SPAs and IPs: [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48] [49] [50] etc etc.

of note, this page has been protected many many many times temporarily. It's an extremely controversial issue, which is host to many many SPAs.

I think indef semi is the only way this is going to stop, and reduce the burden on long term editors who have tried to improve this article and give it some stability. — Shibbolethink ( ) 03:31, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:24, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent edit warring over subject's DOB. This has been going on for nearly a year now. Some recent sources have been provided, but it's unclear whether they're reliable or not. 108.218.18.197 (talk) 03:51, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:26, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ) 09:12, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:28, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism by IPs. Itsquietuptown ✉️📜 12:50, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected until after the election. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:31, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Licorice Pizza (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing, frequent additions of unsourced and original research being added. Samurai Kung fu Cowboy (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Until after release. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:47, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – The Walter White drug vandal has returned after a week under yet another username (otherwise, I would request the block of the user). Considering the relatively narrow scope of the problem, temporary pending changes should be enough. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 20:46, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:48, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated addition of birth date not widely published. MB 21:19, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:52, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. IP editors persistantly add Z.P.H., which according to http://www.netky.sk/clanok/matovic-ma-na-krku-trestne-oznamenie-spor-na-socialnej-sieti-bude-mat-dohru-na-sude stands for "zbabelé psychopatické ho**o" [cowardly psychopathic ?????]. The site https://www.parlamentnelisty.sk/arena/420356/moji-manzelku-si-do-huby-neber-ty-psychopaticke-h-o-pise-matovicovi-exporadca-radicovej-a-kisku-bato/ indicated this was "zbabelé psychopatické hovno" [cowardly psychopathic shit]. Translations courtesy of Google Translate. Please feel free to redact this after dealing with the matter. Peaceray (talk) 22:56, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:58, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – New editors/IPs have made the same (bad) change 3 times this month. PC until they lose interest would be helpful. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 23:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Amortias (T)(C) 21:35, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: This article seems too important to not at least give it PC protection. Handling dangerous substances is not something to play with, and this article must always be trustworthy. Hextor26 (talk) 01:38, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Amortias (T)(C) 21:47, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Waukesha Christmas Parade attack Jtwilson37 (talk) 21:02, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined No edit request made. Lectonar (talk) 21:08, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP users are adding the actor Mario Espitia to the cast list without citing a reliable source. They are copy and pasting a reference that is already in the page as their source however the source does not mention the actor. I have warned the users multiple times on their talk pages and on the talk page of the television series but refuse to stop their disruptive editing. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 01:03, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. by Ohnoitsjamie. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:12, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent COI sockpuppetry, have repeatedly notified involved editors, never getting any response. At least two of their accounts are autoconfirmed so semi protection won't do much. Protection will be needed until action is taken on the SPI. Mako001 (talk) 03:29, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined that article is a mess but protection won't help. Suggest raising it at WP:COIN. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:18, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This wiki having an increase in vandalism and is currently under controversy. MrMoffattPlayz (talk) 17:35, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Amortias (T)(C) 22:08, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Repeated hijacking of redirect target to a non-existent title. Jalen Folf (talk) 01:24, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 01:38, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sock puppetry with IPs, particularly by Dealer07. (I'd just semi-protect this until after the event, which is on 19 December.) ―Jochem van Hees (talk) 13:38, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined there are a lot of edits happening there but I can't see many being reverted. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:32, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Consistently receiving the same invalid edits from a non-user of Wikipedia. Mmrh1 (talk) 22:36, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:54, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. WhoAteMyButter (📨talk📝contribs) 05:40, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of another year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:20, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: - IP vandalism. --BabbaQ (talk) 21:42, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Amortias (T)(C) 21:56, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Only one of these appears to be vandalism, the remainder appear to be attempts (though not nessecarily done well) to update the article. Amortias (T)(C) 21:58, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Literally just reverted more.BabbaQ (talk) 00:59, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., clearly by now more than one vandal edits, and we do not want this in a BLP article.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:47, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. This is preposterous at this point. This talk page has been unprotected for less than two weeks and there have already been a number of disruptive comments from IP users, ranging from WP:NOTFORUM to grossly offensive. The initial semi-protection from a few weeks ago demonstrably worked, and it should be reimplemented. Curbon7 (talk) 03:04, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | tålk 15:07, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Bobherry Talk Edits 13:43, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:45, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Extended-confirmed protection:A presumed sockpuppet of Anshuman Tiwari Official (talk · contribs) hijacked this page to turn it into his pet vanity page. I'd ordinarily ask for a semi, but the presumed sock is autoconfirmed. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 04:59, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:40, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term disruptive editing. Citobun (talk) 06:18, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please protect this page, I am getting sick of asking the IP for a reliable source for their made-up place name. Citobun (talk) 13:10, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. Favonian (talk) 16:51, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of edit warring by Sundayclose. This user continually keeps reverting edits which have been either sourced or cut down so as not to be excessive, and he accuses others of assuming ownership over the article when he is asked to bring any doubts to the talk page. He has already been issued a warning to avoid breaking the three-revert rule. Jienum (talk) 12:30, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Bbb23 (talk) 14:23, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:ERA serial violations. tgeorgescu (talk) 14:36, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:43, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: increase of BLP violations from anon. IP Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 18:22, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:08, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 18:54, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:08, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing, see also Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#203.145.95.X_harassment,_personal_attack_and_possible_part_of_off_site_canvassing_behaviours. Citobun (talk) 02:38, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:20, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP edits from Showbiz826, pushing the same image they've been doing for months. Ravensfire (talk) 04:08, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:25, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As soon as protection goes off, the unhelpful anon IP edits begin again... Montanabw(talk) 04:18, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:26, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP editors changing name and unsourced content about some dispute. Couldn't find any evidence of either being true or notable. Escape Orbit (Talk) 18:03, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:21, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Vacant0 (talk) 18:18, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:21, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism. Ïvana (talk) 19:06, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:18, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple new and IP editors vandalizing BLP. Schazjmd (talk) 19:11, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:17, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Gotitbro (talk) 04:56, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:33, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. WhoAteMyButter (📨talk📝contribs) 05:39, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 19:37, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. WhoAteMyButter (📨talk📝contribs) 05:40, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ferret.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:38, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. WhoAteMyButter (📨talk📝contribs) 05:40, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ferret.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:38, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. WhoAteMyButter (📨talk📝contribs) 05:41, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:41, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IPs reverting a well-sourced birthday change. Yeeno (talk) 🍁 05:58, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:47, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by new or unregistered users. Its protection recently expired although it has been protected many times in the past. Snuish (talk) 06:05, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:49, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Engr. Smitty Werben 08:17, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:51, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Incessant disruptive IP editing. Citobun (talk) 09:35, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:56, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Low-level but persistent disruption. Semsûrî (talk) 12:50, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:58, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. BilCat (talk) 19:38, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:52, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A user has taken a fake "announcement" by Cantona that he is taking over as Manchester United manager a little too seriously. User:2charlieyoung should probably be blocked briefly for disruptive editing too. – PeeJay 15:00, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ChrisTheDude. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:14, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – This is a highly anticipated film releasing next month. It currently has semi protection set to expire in a few days, but that as still not prevented disruptive editing. I don't think extended confirmed protection will help, so requesting pending changes protection to help curb the disruptive editing. -. Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:00, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPending changes is only suited for infrequently edited articles. Favonian (talk) 17:08, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page has been semi-protected for an entire decade. I'm wondering if we might remove protection entirely, as that seems like plenty of time to discourage whoever was causing trouble back then. If we see a new wave of vandalism or other tendentious editing, we can always restore it. —Torchiest talkedits 20:22, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected I've put it on pending changes but I'm willing to give it a go. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:45, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:06, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nehme1499 15:03, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:20, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from multiple IPs. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 15:38, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:24, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 16:20, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:27, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Many unregistered users, IP users and new users can cause disruptive editing like vandalism, unnecessary things etc. So, please request this article to create semi-protected page editing indefinitely as soon as possible. Thank you. Abhiraj Mohan 31 (talk) 17:22, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:29, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite semi-protection: Many unregistered users, IP users and new users can cause disruptive editing like vandalism, unnecessary things etc. So, please request this article to create semi-protected page editing indefinitely as soon as possible. Thank you. Abhiraj Mohan 31 (talk) 17:25, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:32, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Loafiewa (talk) 17:35, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Discospinster. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:34, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – social media bullying. Chennai Passangai (talk) 18:21, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:10, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Create as a redirect to Clarice Phelps * Pppery * it has begun... 02:07, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:51, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

26 November 2021

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – POV pushers are back again... sigh. Probably needs permanent semi or pending changes protection, this is a slow moving but perpetual problem. Montanabw(talk) 03:08, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is already pending changes protection, and the edits which were reverted were made by autoconfirmed users, so that semi-protection would not help either.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:22, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:02, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Kaltenmeyer (talk) 04:35, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, there were several vandal edits a few days ago and nothing else thus year.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:28, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism and disruption due to recent events, 1 or 2 days of protection would probably be enough Snowflake91 (talk) 22:17, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:20, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Unregistered users removed references from the page and claiming that they are of different person. Similar situation happened before in Milo dinosaur. The admin conclude that a known sock-puppet Ineedtostopforgetting has been editing the page with multiple accounts to create illusion of support. The user now refrain from edit with wikipedia account, thus many IP pop up in this page Robepang (talk) 13:21, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:12, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Over the last two days an anonymous IP has continued to go into the page and remove long-standing, sourced content. A short-term block would save editors a lot of time.Hobomok (talk) 15:06, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined one IP was blocked earlier; aside from the IP-hopping it's a content dispute. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:22, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, misinformation as well as unsourced statements. 139.47.37.221 (talk) 15:34, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:23, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Many unregistered users, IP users and new users can cause disruptive editing like vandalism, unnecessary things etc. So, please request this article to create semi-protected page editing indefinitely as soon as possible. Thank you. Abhiraj Mohan 31 (talk) 17:21, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:27, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite semi-protection: Many unregistered users, IP users and new users can cause disruptive editing like vandalism, unnecessary things etc. So, please request this article to create semi-protected page editing indefinitely as soon as possible. Thank you. Abhiraj Mohan 31 (talk) 17:26, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:33, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruption by sockpuppet. HistoryofIran (talk) 17:29, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:34, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism, again, relating to the Among Us meme. This is unlikely to stop soon. —AFreshStart (talk) 13:40, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:59, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:05, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Last vandalism was october --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:05, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not entirely true, there was some talk page vandalism today. But thank you! —AFreshStart (talk) 17:29, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... (CC) Tbhotch 02:15, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long term vandalism from a dynamic IP that removes sourced content from the page. This has been happening for several months. – DarkGlow20:02, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I see sporadic disruption but also (apparently) constructive IP edits. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:38, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Daily bad faith edits getting mixed in with useful additions, making reverting convoluted. Davepeta (talk) 22:48, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – bradv🍁 00:49, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 21:51, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:29, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent vandalism from a sole purpose recently created new account. Kaizenify (talk) 23:03, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Amortias (T)(C) 00:27, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Prevent sock puppets. NSAandGCHQ (talk) 23:26, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:30, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 01:45, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:00, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Present Vandalism from a few people. Swagging (talk) 02:00, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:03, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism.  melecie  t - 02:09, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:07, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Unwatched page. Refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Madzookie1122/Archive fo more information. (CC) Tbhotch 02:14, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:12, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes protection: Recurring vandalism and vandalistic spam by various IPs; see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics#Vandalism of "Limit inferior and limit superior" and page history eviolite (talk) 03:41, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:55, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly Visible Template. ~2850 transclusions Qwerfjkltalk 07:17, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator MusikBot II. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:26, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:27, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced information without a citation. livelikemusic (TALK!) 00:56, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Semi-protection would be ineffective as editors concerned are autoconfirmed. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:51, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:41, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent vandalism 58.6.228.165 (talk) 01:06, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:55, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:41, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive IP/IP turned registered user (fan) keep removing her marriage news. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 04:00, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:16, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:41, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive IP/IP turned registered user (fan) keep removing his marriage news. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 04:00, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:16, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:41, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 04:04, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:30, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:41, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Sporadic IP vandalism by IP sockpuppet. BattleshipMan (talk) 04:30, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:37, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:41, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Mr. Malhotra has made public some concerns / concerning data connected to the mRNA vaccines. Controversial edits occured, with more to be expected. Banvd (talk) 05:33, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Lectonar (talk) 08:38, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done as WP:COVIDDS ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:42, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:42, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Shouldn’t this page have at least some protection since a), it is a biography and b) because the person (Thomas Bach) is an important one. LightningCow (talk) 07:46, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, no, we do not protect pages preemptively.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:53, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:41, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Eevee01(talk) 11:08, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by ip user. User talk:185.146.100.3 The more I revert, the more he does. Itcouldbepossible (talk) 13:05, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. IP blocked. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:25, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Permanent semiprotection. Due to its title, it has a "this is not a test space" notice, but still, all edits in the last 5-1/2 years are vandalism, or undoing vandalism. 69.174.156.186 (talk) 15:54, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:39, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:39, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Amortias (T)(C) 17:54, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Constant, though probably good faith, addition of unsourced babble. Roxy the dog. wooF 17:00, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Euryalus (talk) 22:43, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 18:38, 26 November 2021 (UTC) 18:38, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. per WP:PIA. -- Euryalus (talk) 22:35, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent unexplained removal of the station logo. The IPs seem dynamic enough that I'm not entirely sure how any block could sufficiently apply, so this may have to do. WCQuidditch 18:44, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Euryalus (talk) 22:33, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Megaman en m (talk) 22:05, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Euryalus (talk) 22:12, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing from various auto-confirmed SPAs. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 04:42, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 22:47, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent WP:KIDSTVDATES and unsourced content/vandalism after multiple protections. wizzito | say hello! 08:57, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 22:50, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Unexplained removal of text by IPs almost immediately after unprotection. Kleinpecan (talk) 09:26, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 22:53, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism on the description, especially on the nationality, the "Berber" issue, and a lot of editions seems controversial. 92.186.130.246 (talk) 09:41, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 22:56, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

27 November 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 21:50, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question: @FilmandTVFan28: you might need to elaborate. It's not at all clear to me what the problem is with those edits. You've reverted them without explanation and now you're asking for semi protection on the ground of sockpuppetry without providing any details. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:28, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The IP user used a Wikipedia article as a source instead of an actual source. — FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 00:05, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content and commentary by fans, especially now that he's retired. Engr. Smitty Werben 11:07, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 00:18, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: addition of excessive unsourced information on expiry of protection 42.106.237.226 (talk) 11:21, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 00:21, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:24, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 00:25, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Yesterday, an alleged error in the article was covered by a prominent Youtuber, leading to repeated attempts to "correct" the article (by IP and registered users), without giving a source (examples 1, 2, 3). The original value turns out to be correct (see the article talk page for details). The article should be protected, at least until the original spike in viewership for the video has passed. Renerpho (talk) 22:26, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 00:28, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: persistent sockpuppetry and addition of unverified and unsourced data 2402:3A80:1A44:32E7:CC66:C978:2C6B:ECBA (talk) 04:41, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. BusterD (talk) 00:11, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – While I appreciate the efforts of WayKurat and AssumeGoodWraith, I have to ask that this article be indefinitely protected. Since I wrote it in 2017, it has been a perennial target of vandalism, and is on few watch lists. The most recent vandalism persisted for more than two days, and vandalism began again immediately after the semi-protection expired. Due to the controversial nature of the contents, and the impulse of adolescents of all nationalities to vandalize articles on swear words, I believe indefinite semi-protection to be in this case warranted. Psiĥedelisto (talkcontribs) please always ping! 07:04, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. BusterD (talk) 00:12, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite protection: Because she is the former president of Argentina, current vice president, and—for sure—the most important political figure in the country. And literally because of this. Also, please protect Alberto Fernández because of similar reasons, some months ago I had to remove some biased "information" on the lead section. 2803:9800:9096:7ECF:618F:B8B0:B6AC:D0F2 (talk) 20:43, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Euryalus (talk) 22:23, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Premature signing information being added in violation of WP:SPORTSTRANS. Zander251 (talk) 05:19, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Muboshgu. --Euryalus (talk) 07:38, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Arbitration enforcement (WP:AP2) – The same kind of politically-charged vandalism from IPs keeps occurring when the page is off semi-protection. This is a BLP article, and this can't keep happening. The vandalism is obvious, so I'd like to try pending changes. This article is already under an WP:ARBAPDS sanction. ― Tartan357 Talk 08:24, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected--Ymblanter (talk) 08:38, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant vandalism and misinformation, even people wanting to change the name of the page and moving it 01 Stub BOT (talk) 16:31, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 10:33, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There has been edit-warring on this page before, and there is a new editor who has been edit-warring with several editors, apparently not understanding or wanting to learn how Wikipedia works, or discuss on the talk page. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 09:51, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

They are carrying on today, making changes based on a single source which does not justify them. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 00:40, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, if the user continues move-warring they will be blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:42, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: See Gubbi Gubbi people - following making uncited changes to the name there, the same user moved this page to the other spelling. So far no authoritative source or consensus on the spelling of the name. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 09:53, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And they've just moved it again, without consensus. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 00:38, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, if the user continues move-warring they will be blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:43, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Larry Hockett (Talk) 05:51, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 10:41, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. twotwofourtysix(My talk page and contributions) 10:09, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Most recent disruption is by IP then creating an account after vandalising. twotwofourtysix(My talk page and contributions) 10:11, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Less Unless (talk) 10:25, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Many unregistered users, IP users and new users can cause disruptive editing like vandalism, unnecessary things etc. So, please request this article to create extended confirmed page editing. Thank you Abhiraj Mohan 31 (talk) 10:25, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Less Unless (talk) 10:26, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Consistent inserts of self-promotion by a slew of Indian users, likely sock-puppetry to promote a product ASpacemanFalls (talk) 10:38, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Also, in case of edit-warring please warn the user properly on their talk page. Less Unless (talk) 10:29, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent spamming - AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 06:27, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless (talk) 10:33, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated IP vandalism, probable meatpuppetry. Sajaypal007 (talk) 15:39, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:35, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – An extended confirmed user is performing disruptive edits. I tried to discuss on the talk page, but there was no reply. Either protect this article or block the user from mainspace for some time, please. Shinnosuke15, 06:24, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined There seems to be another user who believes the edits made by the extended confirmed user are justified. Please discuss on the talk page and also inform/warn the user properly on their talk page (which hasn't been done). Less Unless (talk) 10:38, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – I don't know how this got missed for protection, but it was just deleted for 3 hours by an anon IP editor. The result being that the main template page was deleted as well, since this is transcended there. Mako001 (talk) 10:26, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. BusterD (talk) 16:18, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level IP vandalism due to emergence of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant 42.106.205.28 (talk) 17:49, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:32, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

28 November 2021

Reason: Edit warring with IP editors on the subject of Jeff Bergman and if he is still voicing the character or not. And the IP editors lack evidence what what Bergman voiced, or is set to voice the character in after 2018. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 03:41, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 22:55, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editor is adding blatantly wrong CSD templates to this page again. EDM fan 2 (talk) 07:42, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 22:58, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent removal of person's marriage news. In addition, I have previous filed for sockpuppet check for the 2 already blocked user recently, however, for unknown reasons, they are different person despite having similarities. The latest user also copied my user page one for one as seen here despite me not yet reverting their edits. Hence requesting semi-protection, as this has been requested for 2–3 times already but rejected due to user already blocked. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 09:06, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I see the editors have been blocked as well. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 22:59, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Same as above. Persistent removal of person's marriage news hence requesting semi-protection, as this has been requested for 2–3 times already but rejected due to user already blocked. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 09:09, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 23:00, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Lone-078 (talk) 09:23, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Longish term protection seems more appropriate than indefinite protection at this point. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 23:01, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Austronesier (talk) 10:20, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Blablubbs. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 23:02, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: - Open-proxy IP vandalism for several days.--BabbaQ (talk) 11:57, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. All IPs have already been blocked. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 23:03, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Consistent edit disruptions. 2A01:4B00:85BB:5200:C10F:D59D:446D:E3DF (talk) 12:17, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 23:04, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of IP vandalism (some of it even picked up by the media) amid a search for a new head coach and a big rivalry game warrants semi-protection for a week or so, imo. Zeng8r (talk) 13:07, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 23:04, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Just won a big game. Generic sports banter/vandalism.  Bait30  Talk 2 me pls? 20:42, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) As someone who is nearing 20 reverts on this article within the past hour (!!!), I endorse this request. --Dylan620 (talk) 22:24, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 22:52, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP users keep marking him as dead when no reliable sources have mentioned it. Ue3lman (talk) 17:03, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 23:11, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Loafiewa (talk) 17:11, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 23:12, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 17:26, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 23:17, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Note. I also made a request to restore the page to a stable version. [51] on WP: Request for a specific edit. The original article was littered with POV edits, puffery, unsourced claims, claims with sources that did not mention or contradicted what was being said on the article, promotion of organizations, irrelevant sections which I expounded on that page. I also brought up in the talk page of the article. [52]. I restored the article to an early 2020 version of the article [53] as the version was far superior the one during Nov 26th, 2021, was more neutral, had far more sources, had more reliable and verifiable sources, less POV claims and aligned closely to the last consenus building discussions on the talk page of the article, which was last done Dec 2019. A user then restored the vandalized, POV version of the article twice. After a few hours, another user made numerous edits removing 90% of the information on the article, despite a few of the sections being relevant to the topic at hand such as criticisms by Ernest Trumpp and McLeod and Bibliolatry while leaving numerous unsourced claims in the opening paragraph remaining. Examples of deletion of content recently- [54], [55],[56], along with 3-4 more examples. Suthasianhistorian8 (talk) 18:38, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator C.Fred. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 23:17, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. BattleshipMan (talk) 19:10, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This should get us through the holidays; I suspect the vandalism is pretty seasonal. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 23:19, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs and new accounts keep changing the intensity to bump it up to category 5. Some speculation exists about the possibility of this storm reaching category 5, but such an intensity has not been established by an official or reliable source. TornadoLGS (talk) 19:46, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 23:20, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Including at least one copyright violation [57]. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 20:17, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 23:22, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. ― Blaze The WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:21, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 23:23, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sports banter-related vandalism, along the same lines as Hassan Haskins above. Dylan620 (talk) 21:21, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 23:24, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Erinthecute (talk) 21:24, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 23:25, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unreferenced edits from IP user/s. TheHotwiki (talk) 10:07, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 23:02, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. ImChessFan21 (talk) 13:22, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 23:05, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Many IPs trying to add a cast member which is seem to be not notable. 🌍🌍卂卄卩🌍🌍 13:26, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 23:07, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Hello I read both Naruto & Detective Conan sources in the list. Naruto Shueisha (official publisher) source says it has "sold" 250 million copies, Detective Conan one says "it has 250 million copies in circulation worldwide (including copies not sold)" Naruto should be above as of now. But User:Yujoong changing the order. He first removed Mangaplus/Shueisha source (most reliable source) Now both User:Yujoong and Creating User:Cosmo Sentinel changing the order everyday as they want. Can you prevent or warn them ? Ruderhymer (talk) 13:51, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 23:07, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:BALKANS. Persistent addition of unsourced material. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 15:06, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I've warned the user. Since it's one IP, they can be blocked if this continues. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 23:09, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 16:16, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I've warned the user, who can be blocked if they continue. Besides the recent single IP editor, I'm not seeing an issue to the point where indefinite protection is needed. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 23:10, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Michigan stadium is constantly under vandalism and disruptive editing. Just look in the history. I recommend this as a course of action, as a similar stadium, Ohio Stadium has this level of protection to counter against vandalism. It works. Specifically indefinite because the vandalism doesn't end. Lectrician2 (talk) 22:02, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not seeing the level of vandalism I usually look for to justify indef protection. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 23:38, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppetry from a dynamic IP; vandalism has continued for numerous years as soon as protection expired. – DarkGlow22:05, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 23:39, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Dynamic IP claims they are related to the subject and keeps changing the person's name, without sourcing. Will start a talkpage discussion to try to encourage them to provide a source. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 17:20, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. I've partial-blocked the /64 from the page, but left access to the talk page open so they can provide a source if they have one. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 23:14, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Target for IP vandalism, particularly by adding the word "useless" to the description of the Konosuba character. SonnikuSan (talk) 23:22, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined One vandalistic edit a month ago doesn't justify protection now. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 23:40, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism by possible IP vandal 78.70.186.80 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Bettering the Wiki (talk) 23:48, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 23:55, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Level of IP vandalism has increased lately. Note from history that the article is a regular target for vandals, requesting a longer than standard length of protection. Thank you, PKT(alk) 01:26, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 04:28, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP and MAC addresses' edit with no source or unconfirmed information. Centcom08 (talk) 02:28, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:40, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Could you have the article protected longer than a week? A few months perhaps? Because the last time the page was protected, after the expiration, the IP editors went back to editing to they’re preffered but still unsourced edits, seemingly learning nothing. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 02:34, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator GorillaWarfare. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:43, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruption started shortly after protection expired. This article has been discussed in the media (see the talk page) so it's unlikely to survive unprotected the short term. And this should not have lasted seven minutes on a high-visibility page. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 04:19, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Acroterion (talk) 04:25, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A user continually creates new accounts (as it previous accounts have been blocked indefinitely) to vandalize the Milan article by adding false and meaningless information. Jerkusla (talk) 03:28, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:53, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Unbearable IP vandalism. L33tm4n (talk) 04:11, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:59, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: high level of vandalism due to be Today's Featured Article. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 04:42, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:05, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Zander251 (talk) 04:44, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:11, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing Ijick (talk) 06:30, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Cwmhiraeth. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:06, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: To enforce the consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Myanmar 2013. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:21, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: To enforce the consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Myanmar 2013. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:23, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: To enforce the consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Myanmar 2013. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:25, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: To enforce the consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Myanmar 2013. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:27, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism; changing the certifications to Diamond while it has not been officially announced on any source + the offical RIAA certifications have not been updated yet. Maxwell King123321 05:05, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:15, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ― Tartan357 Talk 05:56, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:21, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. WikiMic talk 08:46, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Same as the target, SUS. Favonian (talk) 11:04, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Rathfelder (talk) 13:17, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ToBeFree. Favonian (talk) 11:12, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP user 108.30.187.155 has returned after a 48-hour block (Evergreen Fir) to resume the behaviour for which he/she was originally blocked. Hasn't learned a thing as far as I can see.   Aloha27  talk  17:03, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Berean Hunter. Favonian (talk) 11:15, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. InfiniteNexus (talk) 06:25, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Talk pages are very rarely protected, and the current level of vandalism is fairly low. Favonian (talk) 11:29, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page keeps getting WP:Verifiable sources removed and WP:Primary sources added. This is a controversial topic in teh Sikh community so it maybe a good idea to protect it. SH 11:35, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected. The disruption is quite infrequent, so this should do the job. Favonian (talk) 11:42, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. As always, as soon as protection is lifted from this page, IP editors will come along; in this case, there has been very serious defamatory information added to the article which IMO requires oversighting. This page should be protected indefinitely. —AFreshStart (talk) 14:06, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:16, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

THIS INFORMATION IS COMPLETELY WRONG AND MISGUIDING MASSES ABOUT MY RELIGION KINDLY REMOVE THIS FALSE INFORMATION 2400:ADC5:19E:2F00:410E:D381:3959:77AF (talk) 08:57, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – No idea which article you're referring to. Favonian (talk) 11:23, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Due to recent rumors many IPs are just running wild there. We should wait until better sources come out. SerVasi (talk) 15:43, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 16:29, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

...

Indefinite semi-protection: These templates are no longer highly transcluded (currently 0 transclusions). (This probably doesn't apply to all of these templates.) Qwerfjkltalk 17:10, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – The whole idea is that these templates are only transcluded when a user makes a certain (common) kind of template-relate mistake. Hopefully, the mistake will be repaired and the template will no longer be transcluded. I just looked at Category:Templates with incorrect parameter syntax and found this instance. Now the category is empty again. Favonian (talk) 11:38, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: This page doesn't need protecting - it's a C-class in need of improvement and there are non auto-confirmed editors with valid points coming to it but being unable to edit. Iskandar323 (talk) 05:38, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: @Iskandar323: Am I correct in assuming that you meant the article rather than the talk page? I've gone out on a limb and changed the request. Favonian (talk) 11:50, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@El_C: Notifying the protecting admin. Favonian (talk) 11:53, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected. This page has had over 30 previous protections, so doesn't need protecting? Indeed, because it's already protected. El_C 13:12, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – edit-warring over "far-right". Kleinpecan (talk) 12:51, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 16:44, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Regular addition of masses of unsourced and trivial information, despite requests against doing so. I asked for the user to be blocked, but it was denied. Seasider53 (talk) 14:48, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Then protection isn't the way to go either. Lectonar (talk) 16:48, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High editing activity and resultant vandalism occurring on this page after subject's death. Sunshineisles2 (talk) 15:00, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 17:39, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Sajaypal007 (talk) 15:18, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 16:48, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: In the last four days there have been eight non-sourced edits or deletions by 50.71.85.218 and eight reverts by four editors. A temporary "pending changes protection" might be prudent. I am not a participant in the reversals or problem edits. Wiki-psyc (talk) 16:30, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 16:56, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. M.Bitton (talk) 22:12, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:17, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

change "The group is composed of four members..." to "The group is composed of five members...". SHINee has stated themselves that the group will always have five members. Jonghyun died, but he is and will always be part of SHINee. Zo223 (talk) 19:23, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

change "The group is composed of four members..." to "The group is composed of five members...". Zo223 (talk) 19:25, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Has this been raised on the talk page? —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 20:14, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined This needs discussion. Lectonar (talk) 16:58, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

29 November 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – WP:BALKANS. Persistent additions of unsourced content. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 16:16, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 20:30, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I am now having a disagreement with IP editors on the exact dates that Jeff Bergman voiced Sylvester in. As I have researched, Bergman has not reportedly voiced Sylvester for anything in between 1991 and 1997, but the IPs keep reverting it back to in between 1993 and 1997. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 17:58, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 20:31, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have tried using the article's talk page, but it's done nothing.

Reason: I am also having disagreements with IP editors on the exact dates that Jeff Bergman voiced Foghorn Leghorn in for similar reasons as I am having with the Sylvester the Cat article. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 17:59, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 20:32, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism since June. BlameRuiner (talk) 21:14, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Present Vandalism from multiple IP Addresses. Swagging (talk) 21:39, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Obnoxious trolling. $chnauzer 22:08, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Present Vandalism from multiple IP Addresses over the course of two weeks. Swagging (talk) 22:35, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: BLP policy violations – We're getting about an IP vandal a day on this BLP. Pending Changes protection might work to keep the IP vandalism off of this BLP, while still allowing IPs to make productive edits. — Mhawk10 (talk) 01:19, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Zander251 (talk) 04:18, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The protection is no longer necessary because there is not enough legitimate sources to support the article and it stops users from increasing the amount of valuable information on the 2nd commando regiments page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SAVAGE ACTUAL (talkcontribs) 21:18, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This redirect is not protected. Please see the section #2nd Commando Regiment (Australia) concerning the target of the redirect. Favonian (talk) 21:25, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:04, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Targeted by IP hopper. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 18:46, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of edits and changes regarding the incumbency. People are unfamiliar with the constitutional procedure of replacing Prime Minister. Petr Fiala is PM-designate (even though he assumed the office) he doesn't have the executive powers yet until his cabinet is sworn in. I request temporary lock until the middle of December 2021. Itsyoungrapper (talk) 20:42, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – It looks like, with the low level wikifiddling of things like order of politician's name in the infobox that prolific sockpuppet User:Politialguru is back in town. Semi-protection for a while might see him get bored and go back to whatever else he/she does for fun. 10mmsocket (talk) 15:30, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:51, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP edit warring. Jalen Folf (talk) 16:58, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:56, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Re-directed by an admin with no history of involvement in any drum and bugle corps. High notability of original page because of historical documentation by Drum Corps International, et. al.2605:A601:AF43:BA00:75B2:DE89:3680:5AAD (talk) 03:16, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The page is currently in a deletion discussion, so there has been no further redirection, which was done in good faith anyway. —C.Fred (talk) 03:18, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Bobherry Talk Edits 17:35, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:00, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruption/edit warring by IP user. BilCat (talk) 20:42, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP 89.101.207.98 has continued over this past week/weekend, to slow edit-war content into the article, which he has no consensus for. Furthermore, the IP has avoided 'discussing' his challenged edits, on the article's talkpage. GoodDay (talk) 02:04, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – there has been persistent disruptive editing from IPs on this page that continue to remove well-sourced content without explanation. — Mhawk10 (talk) 03:32, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continued restoration of this article (from the redirect), by sockpuppets; originally created by a notorious sockpuppeter, and that version has been persistently restored over the last few days. I've also been getting hampered on my talk page by the sock pleading for me to delete the redirect, probably so they could get someone else to then create the redirect without the sock history, and then without me getting notified of it being linked to wherever. AshMusique (talk) 21:44, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:18, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Scott Stadium is the University of Virginia's football stadium and the team lost a rivalry game to Virginia Tech yesterday. Their fans are now repeatedly vandalizing the stadium page and it’s difficult to keep up with the barrage of nonsense. If the page could be protected for a week, they might find something more worthwhile to do with their lives in the interim. 1995hoo (talk) 21:50, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:19, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 22:39, 28 November 2021 (UTC) 22:39, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Johnuniq (talk) 09:23, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because….

It has been locked after clear partisan edits. The article now shows a bias that overshadows and misleads a viewer who would have no prior knowledge of the topic. It does this not in any detail section presenting the different opinions on the subject, but adds a baseless opinion in the first sentence which will mislead and confuse readers.

It should be unlocked to edit it back to a non-partisan, purely descriptive, and informational function as opposed to the misleading and opinionated function it clearly serves currently. The opinions presented in the first sentence can be added in a later section that presents the generally left wing opinion of the context around the theory. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.198.202.202 (talkcontribs) 01:51, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined IP has a single edit namely the above hard-to-parse comment. Johnuniq (talk) 05:49, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:02, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:04, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The article has been targeted by IPs several times in November. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 18:23, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Already has pending changes protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:27, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: User discussions should also not be protected, otherwise we will not be able to talk to the user. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:29, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Maxim: Is protection still needed? Monobi last edited in June 2008. Johnuniq (talk) 05:46, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think protection is needed 13+ years later, so I've gone and Unprotected the page. Maxim(talk) 13:02, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing, mainly among IPs. Magitroopa (talk) 02:34, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Escalating from previous protections. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:25, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. FDW777 (talk) 10:24, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was about to come here and ask for this myself. A large number of Single Purpose IP's basically making the same fringy edits. But stopping just shy of breaching 3RR.Slatersteven (talk) 10:43, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Took the article to WP:GA some time ago, so I'm WP:INVOLVED. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:45, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: unexplained removal of reliably-sourced text by IPs. Kleinpecan (talk) 14:12, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The protection is no longer necessary because of there isn’t enough legit references and citations for this page and it stops users from adding legit information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SAVAGE ACTUAL (talkcontribs) 07:04, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: @SAVAGE ACTUAL: I've gone ahead and changed the article to 2nd Commando Regiment (Australia). Hope that's what you intended. Favonian (talk) 11:20, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Nick-D: Notifying the protecting admin. Favonian (talk) 12:00, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The requesting editor here is the long running block evader against whom I have needed to implement the protection. I have blocked them. Nick-D (talk) 07:48, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 16:22, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Uranium Site (talk) 18:55, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. The vandalism is consistent on the page from unregistered and unsourced users. There is a lot of change of content in a short span of time, labeling him of terrorism, anti-arabist, anti-Moroccan a lot of vandalism in the "Berber" issue, nationality, and more. It was already semi-protected for 2 days but now nothing has changed. Please protect it for a longer period of time to avoid daily vandalism. Barcelona12345 (talk) 14:38, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 17:06, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term semi-protection is probably warranted here—a brief look at edits by non-confirmed users shows almost exclusively vandalism and BLP violations. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 16:03, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism; new CEO of twitter. GreaterPonce665 (TALK) 16:26, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 17:07, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: An unregistered user keeps adding opinion-based information shortly after their changes are reverted and tries to somehow legitimate what they have written by adding "last edit by General Motors" Toovinben (talk) 12:54, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Few number of disruption and vandalism from newly registered users and IP user over last 3 months. Fade258 (talk) 14:58, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: 8 of the last 20 revisions were either adding unreliable sources or vandalism. ZLEA T\C 15:06, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IceWelder [] 23:00, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:32, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism from numerous IP's. TylerBurden (talk) 15:28, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias (T)(C) 19:25, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism/WP:Crystal Violations WanukeX (talk) 19:20, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:27, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There is persistent vandalism by sockpuppet accounts, while almost no productive edits are able to be made. -Tax Fraud! [she/they] (talk | contrib.) 19:24, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 19:28, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

change "The blood that is returned to the right atrium is deoxygenated (poor in oxygen) and passed into the right ventricle to be pumped through the pulmonary artery to the lungs for re-oxygenation and removal of carbon dioxide. The left atrium receives newly oxygenated blood from the lungs as well as the pulmonary vein which is passed into the strong left ventricle to be pumped through the aorta to the different organs of the body."

to "The blood that is returned to the right atrium via the inferior vena, superior vena cava and the coronary sinus is deoxygenated (poor in oxygen). The blood is then passed into the right ventricle through the tricuspid valve and then through the pulmonary valve to be pumped through the pulmonary artery to the lungs for re-oxygenation and removal of carbon dioxide. The left atrium receives newly oxygenated blood from the lungs as well as the pulmonary vein which then goes through the bicuspid (mitral) valve into the strong left ventricle. The blood is next passed through the aortic valve to be pumped through the aorta to the different organs of the body." Synyssterr (talk) 05:19, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – Please file an edit request on Talk:Circulatory system. Favonian (talk) 16:32, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 19:23, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Has died down; please relist if it picks up. Lectonar (talk) 17:49, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Page is suffering from disruptive editing, please lock to extended users only. Maurice Oly (talk) 22:57, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, the issue is that nominator appears to have an ownership issue and refuses to engage in discussion. Tessajead (talk) 23:05, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 17:47, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Please restore the redirect and protect extended confirmed. A user is persistently restoring non notable content despite clear consensus at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Seneca_Ridge_Middle_School. Polyamorph (talk) 19:04, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

the user has received the last warning and must be blocked if they continue. Other than this, I do not see a need for protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:18, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fine by me. Polyamorph (talk) 19:35, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, there was a report here too. Well. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:37, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:37, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:37, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated IP spam, likely for the best to semi this until the AfD closes. BSMRD (talk) 19:50, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IP editors adding unsourced changes to BLP. Schazjmd (talk) 20:28, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 20:35, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism: The IP user has basically started an edit war. I have explained that the existing article is as per the sources being quoted but he or she has now increased the level of vandalism and will not discuss the issue QuintusPetillius (talk) 21:21, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi QuintusPetillius, the user is blocked from editing the page for now. Please take a moment to create a discussion section on the article's talk page about the content, and please invite the partially-blocked user to it with a short notice. I can then help if the user evades their block or continues reverting without joining your discussion. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:44, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:44, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because No one is flirting with this page anymore.So you unprotect this page. I am also a member of the Wikipedia.

Thank You. ....... . Ronny141 (talk) 14:31, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – See WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Anshumantiwariofficials#29 November 2021. Favonian (talk) 16:43, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. See edit history. Beshogur (talk) 23:54, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously user Beshogur is the vandal this time, we already have reached concenus at the talk page, but Beshogur does not care and keep making unconstructive edits. He did not even joined the discussion. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Pannonian_Avars#Iranian_language . The reference has be checked and verified by @Kansas Bear:.178.115.58.71 (talk) 08:25, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 18:00, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Apparently unwatched. (CC) Tbhotch 01:10, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I have watchlisted. Lectonar (talk) 17:50, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring. Cpu8 (talk) 08:29, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined That was edit warring...Lectonar (talk) 17:52, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – LTA disruption. HistoryofIran (talk) 11:44, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 17:53, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: many users are just commenting and judging the page unnecessarily, deciding to delete the page and always changing the additions I do on the page. I request page protection so that I can take time and update it to the level of Wikipedia asap with my time. I am responsible for the Atul Kumar Sharma page, I don't want any users to interfere and keep on judging and include it in group discussions. Aqzswxdecfrvgtb (talk) 14:38, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Article is at AfD; OP, please read this Lectonar (talk) 17:55, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Last year, this article got semi-protected multiple times over policy violations (pronoun changes for Chelsea Manning), with the longest instance lasting for a year; now that the year-long protection is finally over, this has started again. Twotwicetalk 21:41, 29 November 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:51, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:51, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:51, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There have been consistent errors with formatting and a lack of acknowledgement for edit requests. I understand that I do not have many edits myself, but I have worked on these articles for a while and I can recognise that the formatting for this specific article is inconsistent. I'd suggest you lower the protection level to only confirmed/autoconfirmed to prevent sockpuppetry. Thank you. ChefExists (talk) 18:35, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article was recently protected by Ponyo due to sockpuppetry. That is a powerful reason to leave the protection unchanged and Ponyo would have chosen ECP for a good reason. The edit requests concern colors to tables and frankly not many long-term editors would want to spend much time thinking about that. That may be why there has not been much response. Johnuniq (talk) 06:01, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. I agree. Lectonar (talk) 18:04, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent edit warring over climatological data spanning almost the entire month of November. Chlod (say hi!) 03:53, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Amortias (T)(C) 19:19, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The amount of trolls on it is crazy. Requesting protection until tomorrow Kool Kow (talk) 19:58, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP Vandalism SMAK (talk) 20:01, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism by both recently registered users and IPs which have a history of vandalising pages. JimmethMM (talk) 20:15, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator C.Fred. Favonian (talk) 22:14, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism from IP Addresses after McCaffery is out for the rest of the year. Swagging (talk) 21:22, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:36, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. ––FormalDude talk 15:40, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:25, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: WP:Crystal WanukeX (talk) 18:41, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Amortias (T)(C) 19:29, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism by IP and registered users. Abdotorg (talk) 19:35, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias (T)(C) 22:50, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

30 November 2021

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and edits due to recent exposure of article on Google's worldwide homepage logo doodle, which is expected to be erected throughout the season. — Crumpled Firecontribs 02:04, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Talk page of proxy abused by Wikinger, has been a major target of his socks. No reason anyone should edit this page. JavaHurricane 15:37, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 00:47, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive editing by various IP editors after the previous temporary protection expired recently on 28 November 2021. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 23:41, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism immediatly after previous protection expired. SSSB (talk) 14:33, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Amortias (T)(C) 22:52, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Moving IP repeatedly adds an unsourced release date for this album, despite being told more than once that they need to provide a source, but they refuse to acknowledge this. Other editors have reverted their edits, but they continue to persist. Hoping that some semi-protection against IP addresses will do the trick. Richard3120 (talk) 20:24, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Amortias (T)(C) 22:52, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Need to add information in Abhira Tribe Incomplete information is attached in it IU Kang Ha-neul (talk) 11:52, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Article is subject to WP:GS/CASTE and protected for a reason. There are no edit requests at article talk. Johnuniq (talk) 22:14, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edits being made and information being removed for local political reasons. 2A02:A450:8DE3:1:F534:AEDC:137B:28C6 (talk) 23:42, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 00:17, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 00:45, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: So that page will not be changed with false information. InternetScavenger89 (talk) 05:00, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 06:18, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 01:38, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Bobak. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:30, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The page is being continuously vandalised by unregistered trolls using their IP addresses. Could you please look into this?. Aakansha Trivedi (talk) 03:01, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 09:00, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 06:13, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 09:05, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 06:38, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:34, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 03:57, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Less Unless (talk) 09:03, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing regarding an obsessive desire by IP and new accounts to alter the ethnic/caste background of this person without reliable sources. This has been ongoing since at least July 2020. This article was protected back in September 2020 for 1 week and in December 2020 for two months. The disruptive editing picked up within days of protection being removed in each instance. It is instructive to look at the page editing history; nearly all edits since the last protection period expired have been disruptions and reversions of such. Temporary protection will not suffice. The POV ethnic chauvinists will not be easily discouraged. Indy beetle (talk) 04:11, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:23, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 06:39, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless (talk) 09:06, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Page has been consistently hijacked by a recurring sockpuppet user who seeks to add promotional content - some examples of diffs include [58], [59]. Tamptonato (talk) 07:29, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 09:13, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. suspected sockpuppets – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 07:40, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Less Unless (talk) 09:17, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – currently today's google doodle; could use some protection. wizzito | say hello! 13:54, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The only reason this article comes up on my watchlist these days is because some IP user (often probably the same one, as most appear to be from Arkansas and South Carolina) wants to remove the fact that Smith said a "black man" had attacked her and killed her children (when it was actually her). Indeed, all the vandalism for the past few years (at least) have been on this one phrase. (But this is a significant detail of the story, and likely the main reason the article is visited 10 to 100 times more often than other comparable filicides.)

The vandalism occurs at irregular intervals, but it would be good to start the process of semi-protection. Thanks -Tiredmeliorist (talk) 14:25, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Too irregular for semi-protection. Lectonar (talk) 14:34, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP-only edits many without summary, requesting page protection. SanAnMan (talk) 22:48, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question: @SanAnMan: could you point out the persistent vandalism edits please? In the last 20 IP edits, I found about 4 which might be called disruptive, but many IPs edit constructively. Lectonar (talk) 17:46, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Lectonar: Apologies, request for protection should have been made due to disruptive editing, not vandalism. Mea culpa. Examples of disruptive editing include [60], [61], [62], [63], [64], [65]. The tv movie only recently aired so it's a hot topic. Thx. - SanAnMan (talk) 18:03, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Sorry for not coming back to this earlier..after looking at the edit-history: things seem to have died down somewhat, and I do not think that the level of disruption warrants a semi-protection atm. Please ping me, or relist, when this picks up. If another admin thinks protection is the way to go: just go ahead, no need to ask me. Lectonar (talk) 13:57, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP anons keep placing it in Birmingham despite it not being in the actual city. Just the county. DragonofBatley (talk) 14:38, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:39, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because This page does not require protection. How to unprotect this page now. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anshuman...... . Ronny141 (talk) 02:41, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined No reason given. Lectonar (talk) 14:12, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP personally attacking editors, suspected of being sock (attack). Highly contentious RfC currently ongoing, semi-protecting page for a week or so would prevent use of IP socks to game it. Santacruz Please ping me! 13:00, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Hampering discussion on a talk-page by keeping away IP editors by protecting said page is not how Wikipedia works. Disruptive IPs can be blocked at need, as happened here. Lectonar (talk) 15:15, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant IP vandalism. BRDude70 (talk) 13:52, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 15:11, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, ever since the previous three year semi-protection expired earlier this month. FDW777 (talk) 17:00, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated IP vandalism related to Category:The Game of Death, which is a redirect for Category:Game of Death, as well as the Game of Death page itself. PohranicniStraze (talk) 05:21, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 18:41, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated IP vandalism related to Category:The Game of Death, which is a redirect for Category:Game of Death, as well as the Game of Death page itself. PohranicniStraze (talk) 05:22, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 18:41, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated recent changes to gender from "him" (assumed correct due to length of time the article has been established as "him") to "her". Semi-protection would stop presumed anti-lgbt editors from disruptive editing as they do on other such articles. 10mmsocket (talk) 15:07, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TheWikiholic (talk) 10:31, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 18:50, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This article has been targeted by various socks of a LTA evader, who is still at it. HistoryofIran (talk) 11:23, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 18:52, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 15:46, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism 172.58.169.31 (talk) 16:44, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because the article is filled with misinformation. He is African-American and they have him listed as Ghanaian. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MeiChan01 (talkcontribs) 11:50, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Discussion is now taking place at the correct venue, Talk:W. E. B. Du Bois#WEB Dubois Is not Ghanaian. Favonian (talk) 16:53, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I have reverted to last version because protection levels has been no expiry set. Please, unprotect page! 125.162.115.251 (talk) 12:41, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Incomprehensible request. Favonian (talk) 16:57, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Violation of the Three revert rule regarding persistent disruptive editing by a certain user (User:Taekhosong) whom alter the template of a ethnicity page with no relevant reason. This has been ongoing since at least 4 November 2021‎. LVTW2 (talk) 08:51, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Response to above: as indicated in page’s history, it was LVTW2 who started changing the page by removing Singaporean Chinese from the overseas Chinese category which is a clear factual error and initiated the three reverts. I am merely changing and defending this page back to its original form. Now LVTW2 accuses ME of disruptive behavior? What kind of logic is this? Taekhosong (talk) 17:31, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Why? See above... Lectonar (talk) 18:12, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long-term abuse by an IP editor adding the "more citations needed" template without explanation. O.N.R. (talk) 10:00, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 18:13, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This may be too minor to request protection for, but the page has been vandalised twice now with the same kind of edit being preformed, even the lowest level of protection could deter it from happening again. notadev (talk) 17:07, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creating page King of the earth 209 (talk) 11:46, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi i would like to create a page

Not done – Create Draft:DiepCity, and when you think it's ready, follow the instructions at WP:Articles for creation. Favonian (talk) 17:04, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism adding nonsense and lengthy list of proposed contestants as content in article space. Likely same editor IP-jumping. AldezD (talk) 04:06, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The bar for protecting article talk pages is pretty high, since it doesn't affect the content of the article. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 18:25, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term abuse from Pontiac, Michigan, multiple IPs. Block evasion by Special:Contributions/2601:408:C300:6780:4909:592A:6E5:CD7 and the range Special:Contributions/2601:408:C301:3EA0:0:0:0:0/64. The same protection is also needed for Saturday Night Live, Saturday Night Live (season 43), Saturday Night Live (season 47), History of Saturday Night Live (2020–present), Sesame Street's 50th Anniversary Celebration, Wild 'n Out, and List of Ridiculousness episodes. Binksternet (talk) 04:13, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Put a rangeblock on a relatively large range. Let's see if that has the desired effect before protecting multiple pages. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 18:30, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism meme regarding birth dates. wizzito | say hello! 18:25, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ferret. clpo13(talk) 21:26, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long history of anonymous editors looking to right great wrongs in the form of vandalism. -"Ghost of Dan Gurney" 18:26, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. clpo13(talk) 21:29, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. There is an internet meme floating around about this page which is encouraging re-vandalism. 96.242.43.121 (talk) 21:21, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 21:23, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Article has seriously deteriorated. Rolling back to a stable version that is somewhat acceptable for inclusion on Wikipedia. Requesting page protection in order to prevent continued addition of unsourced content. ––FormalDude talk 22:58, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Amortias (T)(C) 23:09, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I don't see instability on this page. This article has been edited by student editor User:Ava hedges since September and their class will be discussing student contributions this week (Week 15) before grading. User:FormalDude would be acting in a kindly manner towards a student wikipedian if they chose to cleanup the page without reversion. I suggest a note on the talk page about any issues (helpful to the instructor) and then perform whatever cleanup is required (less bitey). Interacting with other wikipedians is certainly a part of the class. BusterD (talk) 23:24, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting 6-month semiprotection. IP vandalism happening for years in an article within the "Gender and Sexuality" Discretionary Sanctions' purview. Diffs: 1, 2, and 3. Santacruz Please ping me! 04:41, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One instance of vandalism every 2 years is not enough to require protection. I've blocked the most recent IP vandal for a long while and revdel'd their edits to this page. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 18:39, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated attempts from multiple unregistered and registered users to delete RS content relevant to the article (appears to be WP:IDONTLIKEIT). Jtrevor99 (talk) 10:16, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 18:47, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]