User:JulieMinkai

This user has a snazzy line at the top of their userpage ↗

ENERGY: 1/6

JulieMinkai's activity on Wikipedia has decreased significantly.

JulieMinkai is busy and is going to be on Wikipedia in off-and-on doses, and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Emergency user slap button

Editors: Use this button if the user is malfunctioning. (direct link)
Editors can report a malfunctioning user to the village stocks.

This experienced editor is seeking to adopt new users. (Users requesting adoption)

she
they

This user's pronouns are
they/them and she/her.

“

At the end of every day, the encyclopedia is higher quality than it was at the beginning of the day.

”

— Wikipedia:Replies to common objections

Hello! My name is JulieMinkai, but you can call me Julie, Minkai, Betty, Mink, or Abby. I wanted to name my account Minkai, but that name was sadly taken. I remove "[[ ]]" from pages call them edits.

〜(꒪꒳꒪)〜

I am kidding, I do more than that.... maybe

What? How dare you accuse this joke of being stolen!

I browsed the Wikipedia community space for about two and a half years, but was unable to edit because my IP was blocked due to being an open proxy.

Helpful links

XTools (Edit breakdowns)

User access levels

Wiki markup documentation

Citing sources

Making tables

Adding pictures

Teahouse (discussion)

Articles for deletion

Why to contribute

Cleanup templates

Glossary of Wikipedia terms

Newly created pages

The art of reviewing new pages

Template:Burma-shave-notice

Template:ANI status

Not-so-helpful link

Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

Remember this!

Expectations for discretionary sanctions

The availability of discretionary sanctions is not intended to prevent free and candid discussion, but sanctions may be imposed if an editor severely or persistently disrupts discussion. Within the area of conflict, editors are expected to edit carefully and constructively, to not disrupt the encyclopedia, and to:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Any editor whose edits do not meet these requirements may wish to restrict their editing to other topics in order to avoid the possibility of sanctions.

My subpages

ANI Hall of Fame

Planning for seventh Wikipedia movie

Sandbox (TW: Mentions of rape. And no, you can't delete this warning per WP:NOTCENSORED. However, the second sandbox more than makes up for it.)

Museums

This section contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous.
Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.

Museum of inspiring quotes (the only serious museum)

(On an accusation of WP:CAVASSING:)

Utter nonsense, as already explained. WP:COPYWITHIN is a legal requirement. Even if one were to go for a strict reading of WP:Canvass as they seem to be doing here, there clearly was no intent to alter the outcome of the discussion here (Canvassing is notification done with the intention of influencing the outcome of a discussion in a particular way). If 1000 wants to ping other editors (despite the act of pinging previous participants to an AfD probably being even more dubious canvassing than what I have done), that is their problem and one which I have no need to address on my own (though if they do decide to go that way, then this thread might warrant re-opening). RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 14:24, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

...It's incumbent on all parties to ASSUME GOOD FAITH. Yes, we all understand it's human nature to jump to erroneous conclusions, jump down rabbit holes, and look at whatever spectrum of data is narrow enough to justify our own confirmation bias. AGF sets forth the behavioral guideline that this is not acceptable behavior on Wikipedia. Ravenswing 19:00, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Museum of excruciatingly narrow deleted categories

Gnostic apocrypha related with Adam and Eve ^[1]

Museum of What Could Possibly Go Wrong?

From the article on Uriyadi 2:

The film opens with a prologue on Raj Prakash, a wealthy NRI businessman who wanted to open an insecticide factory in London but was denied the required permissions due to the toxicity of the key compound methyl isocyanate (MIC) used. Using the influence of local politicians, Raj Prakash set up the insecticide factory in Tamil Nadu and did good business through exports until the insecticide was eventually banned by the UN, eventually declining his export business. With dwindling returns, Raj Prakash proposed to open a copper sterlite factory after learning of its concentration in the area, but was faced with backlash from the local people, forcing him to withdraw his ambitions. With the insecticide factory being his only business, Raj Prakash decided to double the returns from the existing factory, which was already in a derelict state.

From User:JulieMinkai/sandbox II: Daggerfall:

To prevent him from attempting suicide further times, the general locks Flippy in the base prison without his weapons, dog tags or clothes, coincidentally confining Flippy in the same cell as an attractive she-bear named Amelia.

Museum of Eric Cartman

Content from User:EEng#Museum of Not Exactly Employee of the Month.

From Raymond Chandler:

Chandler was by 1931 a highly paid vice president of the Dabney Oil Syndicate, but his alcoholism, absenteeism, promiscuity with female employees, and threatened suicides contributed to his dismissal a year later.

Articles that need attention

Plot hole - copyvio

Mixels - tone

List of video games notable for speedrunning - tone

Smear frames - severe stub

The Tissue-Culture King - definitely notable; really bad stub

Must-read pages

Principle of some astonishment — Some information doesn't need including.

Is that even an essay? — Some people try to take advantage of Wikipedia's ever-changing number of pages. Don't be fooled.

Levels of competence — Learn how and when to work outside the borders.

You don't have to be mad to work here, but... — A keen observation of the behavior of Wikipedians, written in the style of Dante's Inferno.

E-Prime — Writing without using any form of "to be" can be an interesting challenge.

Chelsea Manning — Truth can be stranger than fiction. One example: the government treated Manning so poorly, 295 lawyers petitioned against them and the government was forced to move her from a maximum-security prison to a medium-security prison!