User talk:Aqzswxdecfrvgtb

This is Aqzswxdecfrvgtb's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Atul Kumar Sharma (November 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

assorted profiles, Amazon, Google, Goodreads and IMDb are not reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Atul Kumar Sharma and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Atul Kumar Sharma, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:26, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aqzswxdecfrvgtb! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 09:26, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Baap Beep Baap (November 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Umakant Bhalerao was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Baap Beep Baap and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Baap Beep Baap, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 11:59, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Baap Beep Baap (November 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Baap Beep Baap and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Baap Beep Baap, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Atul Kumar Sharma for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Atul Kumar Sharma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atul Kumar Sharma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:52, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Atul Kumar Sharma

Atul Kumar Sharma, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Aqzswxdecfrvgtb (talk) 14:52, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Baap Beep Baap (2021)

Baap Beep Baap, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Aqzswxdecfrvgtb (talk) 17:44, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Atul Kumar Sharma, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 17:59, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atul Kumar Sharma. Theroadislong (talk) 18:05, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 20:08, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Baap Beep Baap

Baap Beep Baap, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Aqzswxdecfrvgtb (talk) 05:47, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This template message gives the erroneous impression that this draft was reviewed and accepted. It was not. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 10:07, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Aapki Kahani Aapki Zubani

Hello, Aqzswxdecfrvgtb

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Aapki Kahani Aapki Zubani for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:59, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Baap Beep Baap moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Baap Beep Baap, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 12:06, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Baap Beep Baap 2 (November 27)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Timtrent was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This appears to be a copy and paste draft formDraft:Baap Beep Baap. We will work on that draft. This one was pasted to mainspace, and has been returned to Draft, and now rejected

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 12:07, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Baap Beep Baap 2 has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Baap Beep Baap 2. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 12:11, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Baap Beep Baap 2 has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Baap Beep Baap 2. Thanks! Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 21:46, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Baap Beep Baap 2 (November 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Before this can be considered further please look at the referencing scheme. You have two sets of references numbered 1 through 6. On the simple basis that we cannot tell easily which is referencing what it cannot be accepted, nor reviewed further until this is sorted out

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Baap Beep Baap 2 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Baap Beep Baap 2, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 09:13, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Baap Beep Baap 2 has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Baap Beep Baap 2. Thanks! Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 09:40, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Baap Beep Baap has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Baap Beep Baap. Thanks! Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 11:46, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your paid declaration is incomplete

Your user page does not include Baap Beep Baap and the declaration at Draft talk:Baap Beep Baap does not have its oarameters filled out. Please sort thsi out and sort out all other paid editing declarations. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 14:09, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Atul Kumar Sharma ( writer ), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Theroadislong (talk) 13:11, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Baap Beep Baap has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Baap Beep Baap. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:49, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Baap Beep Baap (November 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

zero in depth coverage in reliable independent sources, this is just paid for promotion of a new non notable film fails WP:NFILM.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Baap Beep Baap and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Baap Beep Baap, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:22, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Atul Kumar Sharma

Hello, Aqzswxdecfrvgtb,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Bensci54 and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Atul Kumar Sharma, for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bensci54}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bensci54 (talk) 18:01, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aqzswxdecfrvgtb,

Atul Kumar Sharma's article has been deleted through an AFD decision. Any recreation will be deleted. If you want to continue your work here as an editor, you will move on and edit articles on other subjects. If you persist in creating this article, you will face a loss of editing privileges.

If you have questions about article creation or Wikipedia's deletion processes, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:47, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Atul Kumar Sharma, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use your sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. This was recreated without permission. If you disagree with the deletion you should contact the admin that deleted the article or start a discussion at WP:DRV. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:32, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Atul Kumar Sharma ( writer )

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Atul Kumar Sharma ( writer ) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atul Kumar Sharma. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Shirt58 (talk) 05:18, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:56, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aqzswxdecfrvgtb,

I asked you not to keep re-creating this article. You've become disruptive. If, when this block is over, you continue, your next block will be a matter for weeks, not hours. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:58, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Liz FYI they have continued to create this article in main space, despite your request. Another editor has now moved it to draft, though. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:22, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A request has been filed for the title of Atul Kumar Sharma ( Author ) requesting that it be added to the title blacklist. This has been done because the article appears to be a recreation, under a different title, of an article which is itself currently protected against recreation. Please note that titles used to circumvent the protection policy are often given the same level of protection as the original title the author is trying to circumvent, or are added to the title blacklist.

If you feel that the topic of the article meets our notability guidelines, please request a deletion review or use a request for unprotection instead.

Please note that repeated recreation of an article against a consensus to delete is considered disruptive and may get you blocked from editing. Thank you. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:23, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aqzswxdecfrvgtb. Thank you. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:16, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Atul Kumar Sharma ( Author ) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Atul Kumar Sharma ( Author ), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 10:57, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Atul Kumar Sharma ( Author ) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Atul Kumar Sharma ( Author ). Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 11:08, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Atul Kumar Sharma ( Author ) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Atul Kumar Sharma ( Author ). Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 11:31, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Advertising-only account, recreating articles immediately after AfD, disruption

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:29, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Aqzswxdecfrvgtb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

theroadisempty (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Please unblock I will make genuine contributions to Wikipedia, and I won't use it for promotional activities. Kindly Unblock

Decline reason:

"Genuine contributions" is a meaningless term. What specifically do you understand about WP:COI and WP:PROMO that you didn't before? What specific subject areas will you edit? Yamla (talk) 12:28, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Will Edit or contribute for notable people by creating or editing notable person's profile. Will submit every details with all secondary supporting references. Won't use my id for personal promotional creations or submissions against Wikipedia guidelines. Give one chance.

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Aqzswxdecfrvgtb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

theradisempty (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Will Edit or contribute for notable people by creating or editing notable person's profile. Will submit every details with all secondary supporting references. Won't use my id for personal promotional creations or submissions against Wikipedia guidelines. Give one chance.

Decline reason:

Wikipedia does not have profiles, not a single one. Wikipedia has articles. You have a conflict of interest in that area(being a paid editor) so you won't be unblocked to, in the short term, edit such articles. If you want to edit about other topics, like Joe Biden or Narendra Modi or the history of your country or science, please tell what topics those might be. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 07:45, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Baap Beep Baap has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Baap Beep Baap. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 06:13, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Atul Kumar Sharma ( Author )

Hello, Aqzswxdecfrvgtb. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Atul Kumar Sharma ( Author ), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Atul Kumar Sharma

Hello, Aqzswxdecfrvgtb. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Atul Kumar Sharma, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:04, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Atul Kumar Sharma

Hello, Aqzswxdecfrvgtb. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Atul Kumar Sharma".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:18, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]