Talk:Alan Mikhail

Selimgate was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 22 October 2020 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Alan Mikhail. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

7 sockpuppets

Seven accounts were found to be sockpuppets of one another, for the most part exclusively concerned with working on this article.

Oiujsdjfhh (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Baxter555 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Ininsgjsnt3 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Kjsyrtjk4w (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Mahmmoooooddd (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
879324ynfddsf (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Cleanwikihistory (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Obviously there is a wee bit of funny business going on here. Possibly (talk) 01:49, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think so. His latest book has been very poorly reviewed and there's an effort to remove that. I have not read OVERCITE and have reduced the visual display. I will use the reviews to expand reception sections.TrangaBellam (talk) 13:35, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistan4ever (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), now blocked, can be added to the above list. Possibly (talk) 22:03, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note

I do not believe Pamela's response merits inclusion. TrangaBellam (talk) 13:27, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This editor TrangaBellam is completely biased and only seeks to disparage the subject in question. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pakistan4ever (talk • contribs) 15:42, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple editors have opposed your edit. Get support from others over here. TrangaBellam (talk) 06:14, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MOS

What are thee issues? TrangaBellam (talk) 13:58, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

asking a question like this is not a discussion nor gaining consensus. Please do not keep restoring your edits until consensus is reached. There were numerous issues with your edits, from minor ones like disregarding the Manual of Style on headings, to removing maintenance templates without addressing the issue, to excessive citations, to WP:PEACOCK language. Please explain what you see as the problems with article as it is and what you would like to see changed. Melcous (talk) 07:33, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Explain in more detail. What is the precise peacock language? Where were the MOS violations? How do you deem that I am closely connected to subject? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TrangaBellam (talk • contribs) 18:05, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]