User talk:NotADev

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Usurped Free Danzig site

Thank you for your thoroughly justified edit removing that usurped site on Government in exile. I did revert, in order to replace that original URL with the last safe archived copy on the WayBack Machine. I took care to note in my edit that yours was good-will and justified. – _•Raven  ^.talk 21:28, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

HMSO

Hi there. Thank you for your edits. When you cite HMSO can you please make sure that you're spelling Stationery correctly? It's not Stationary! Thanks and all good wishes DBaK (talk) 16:39, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Looks like I have done this twice now. I will take note from now on. thank you notadev (talk) 17:17, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

I didn't want to point that out in case it sounded rude! :) Thanks again, cheers DBaK (talk) 17:21, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

I ermmmmm ... ahem ... sorry. DBaK (talk) 22:40, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Nebraska Juvenile Courts moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Nebraska Juvenile Courts. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 06:43, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Notifying you that this page has now been published again with suggested changes. notadev (talk) 06:10, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Marking edits as minor

Hi, you are marking many of your edits as minor when they are not minor. As you can read at Help:minor edit, only edits that in normal language would be called "trivial" are regarded as "minor" in wikispeak. Any edit that changes a meaning, or any edit that another editor may conceivably wish to review, is not minor. For example, this is far from minor. Zero^talk 04:36, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

I would definitely argue that this edit was trivial - the article can continue to exist just fine without it, it doesn't make any substantial change and clarifies points already made which appeared to have been obscured in translation, or something of that effect, and essential no meaning has been changed to mean something it didn't mean before - but if I were to use the definition you have suggested then I cannot imagine any edit which can be considered minor.

I will not mark any edit as minor anymore. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. notadev (talk) 05:01, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. To quote the help page, "Examples include typographical corrections, corrections of minor formatting errors, and reversion of obvious vandalism." Zero^talk 06:10, 6 July 2024 (UTC)