Jump to content

Talk:KJRH-TV

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article name

[edit]

I have moved this article back to KJRH from KJRH-TV. Consensus on both WP:NC#Broadcasting and Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television_Stations#Article_names is that the article name should reflect the actual call letters of the TV station. As can be seen here: [1] the call letters for this station are in fact KJRH. Any concerns regarding this topic would be best addressed here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television_Stations. —A 09:20, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material

[edit]

Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to a list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:

  1. WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information." As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.
  2. As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced.
  3. WP:NLIST tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article.
  4. Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.

If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable. Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. 70.48.216.22 (talk) 00:48, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on KJRH-TV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:03, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New 2.6 Subchannel

[edit]

There has been a new subchannel on the station that needs to be added, Circle as May 2022. UNAWorld (talk) 21:27, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 9 May 2022

[edit]

There has been a new subchannel added to KJRH'S 2.6: Circle. Do I have permission to put that in the template? I already added it to the Circle article as an affiliate, because it REALLY is. Please respond ASAP, thank you. UNAWorld (talk) 15:33, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just to be clear, the way an edit request works is you ask for someone to do an edit on your behalf, and not to gain the ability to edit it yourself. Dont worry, your edit request is still valid, just keep that in mind next time you make an edit request. Ill let another editor look this request over, as I do not wish to go fact checking this myself right now as I am quite busy. Aidan9382 (talk) 15:52, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done: this is not the right page to request additional user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone may add them for you, or if you have an account, you can wait until you are autoconfirmed and edit the page yourself. Terasail[✉️] 18:09, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]