Jump to content

User talk:Whatever748

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Siege of Tlemcen (1299-1307) has been accepted

[edit]
Siege of Tlemcen (1299-1307), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 14:59, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Capture of Mers-el-Kébir (1505) moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Capture of Mers-el-Kébir (1505), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 16:03, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Algiers (disambiguation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bombardment of Algiers. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Capture of Mers-el-Kébir (1505) (January 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chicdat was:
This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This is entirely made up, please see WP:MADEUP. If you have any questions, click here.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 13:26, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Whatever748! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 13:26, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Capture of Mers-el-Kébir (1505) (January 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chicdat was:
This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 11:22, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ottoman Algeria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Agha.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

[edit]
Hi thanks fir creating Ibrahim ben Ramdan Dey. This is an area where English Wikipedia really lacks good coverage. Also, I just realised I recently worked in a draft you created, Capture of Mers-el-Kébir (1505), and got it back into mainspace. Good luck with your editing and please leave a message on my talk page if you need any help. Mccapra (talk) 05:59, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Whatever748 (talk) 11:59, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hussein Dey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Urla.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of governors and rulers of the Regency of Algiers

[edit]

check Talk page two days to remove title of Sultan of El-Djazaïr!!!!! please cooperate. Thank you.--41.248.118.204 (talk) 22:54, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kouloughlis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Regency of Tunis.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File nominated for deletion

[edit]

Hello Whatever748,

I recently nominated a page on Wikipedia for deletion. Could you give your opinion on the discussion page in question since you are contributor on these kind of topics? Thank you!

[1]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Sufetula (546 or 547), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Berber.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Thacia, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Berber and Areobindus.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Vandalic conquest of Roman Africa

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Vandalic conquest of Roman Africa at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Gwillhickers (talk) 18:54, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Vandal conquest of Roman Africa

[edit]

On 2 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Vandal conquest of Roman Africa, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Saint Augustine died during the Vandal conquest of Roman Africa? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Vandalic conquest of Roman Africa. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Vandal conquest of Roman Africa), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Morocco (Population)

[edit]

Thanks very much!

Dear Whatever748, thank you for your commitment and your editing in the article Morocco (Population). I saw user Skitash vandalizing here. I have the same problem with him in the Maghreb (Population) article. He deletes all sources which leads back to a Berber origin. I give authentic sources of scientists. Skitash "refutes" them with sources and claims from some authors and journalists who have dealt purely with the language and culture but not with genetics.

I have already sent an email to an administrator. I hope that this vandalism will be stopped soon.

Best regards Yelendo Yelendo (talk) 10:18, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate Ali khodja/Baba ali chaouch

[edit]

Hi, can you check thèse two sources, because i find no mention about them through its and they have same family pattern. Gavecuriut (talk) 18:25, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I believe those sources are already checked, but thankfully if you have an accessible website to check them, i'll comply. I will have to agree with you that while Baba Ali I was a Kouloughli his "Algerian Kabyle-Mingrelian" origins are likely a confusion with Ali V Ben Ahmed (Ali Khodja).
Whatever748 (talk) 18:30, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, can you give me the forum link please ? I notice you bring the second source [2], can you highlight the sentence which talk about this please ? Gavecuriut (talk) 18:42, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by forum link? And as i said, the Algerian-Mingrelian origins of Baba Ali Chaouch was likely a mistake from anoher other who mistook him for Ali V Khodja
Whatever748 (talk) 18:45, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is a forum to discuss with each other ? You have brought the source so you have the proof of this information. We need the sentences that point out the family origin of Baba Ali Chaouch. Can we remove these sources from Ali Khodja ? Gavecuriut (talk) 19:07, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You make little sense here. Ali Khodja al-Mengreli is the one we know is a Algerian Kabyle-Mingrelian kouloughli. Baba Ali Chaouch is the one who was mixed up with Ali Khodja. If anything we need to remove it from Baba Ali Chaouch. The source while i can't find and open edition for it now, referred to Ali Khodja's mother being a Zwawa woman. I don't know who moved it to Baba Ali Chaouch's page, but i certainly didn't. Whatever748 (talk) 19:12, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We need the corresponding paragraph to be sure, i have found "the forum" btw. Gavecuriut (talk) 19:23, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Numidia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greek.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abu Ali Mustafa Brigades, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestine.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:58, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Spanish-Algerian war (1503-1512)

[edit]

Template:Spanish-Algerian war (1503-1512) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:14, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ibrahim Agha (Algeria) for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ibrahim Agha (Algeria) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ibrahim Agha (Algeria) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Henry (talk) 00:35, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Whatever748&oldid=1247786337"