Talk:Düsseldorf Airport

Germany High‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Airports

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the airport project.

Clean up

The Das Magazin needs cleaning up, for the simple reason there are certain words that are out of context, it reads as a Computer Translation, could someone do something about it. Thanks In Advance DannyM 15:10, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cleaned up, haven't been able to check up on the information presented however. Freethinker1984 14:37, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Air China

Air China don't planning to fly to Beijing, write them a e-mail and you will see it. No flights to Berlin-Tegel too. DON'T EDIT!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.247.34.185 (talk) 21:16, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your claim doesn't meet WP:V. What are your WP:SOURCES? Thanks! — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 22:15, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You still haven't provided even once credible source. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 23:08, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote an Email to Air China! You may do it again and the answer to you is the same. THX! This source: http://www.caac.gov.cn/A1/200709/t20070911_7920.html ..is wrong.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.247.51.109 (talk) 11:39, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This source included all the flights to China in 2008-2009 and it include Air CHina's Dusself-Beijing and Tegel-Beijing flights. http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601082&sid=ayKziNsynIMw&refer=canada Bucs2004 (talk) 16:23, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your source is a copy of my source! Watch the website and you will see it! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.247.56.190 (talk) 19:50, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It still the same!!! Bucs2004 (talk) 01:59, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You've no conception of this!!!!! Whats for example with the Berlin flights.... Are there aviable to booking????? -NO!!! The Information of Bloomberg are completely WRONG! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.247.49.255 (talk) 17:01, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There are flights from China to the USA on the Bloomberg source and I dont see those flights removed> Why do ya'll IPs have to go and deleted DUS-PEK when they came from the EXACT SAME SOURCE. Audude08 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 01:22, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Write a mail man!!! Whats with TXL??? Are there any signs to book, with your info the flights will start in this month (march)!!!??? Air China is in Star Alliance now, Lufthansa too. Air China has flights to FRA and Lufthansa do the codesharing flights to DUS and TXL!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.247.71.100 (talk) 12:54, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They are flying....PERIOD!!!!! Audude08 (talk) 19:51, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In future too man! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.247.81.2 (talk) 14:39, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Terminal A

the heading of this category is 'Star Alliance / Lufthansa partners' why isn't Turkish Airlines than in Terminal A, since it is a Star Alliance member 83.119.172.130 (talk) 17:41, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sky Train or SkyTrain- one word or two, please.

The image captions say Sky Train (two words) but the main text in its sole use says SkyTrain. Which is it? I am guessing it could be either way because in German it would be one word? Examples in English from other airports are fairly evenly split; I don't care which but I think it should be consistent throughout the article (and at the dab page SkyTrain if changed to two words).

The Dusseldorf Airport page itself is inconsistent: The left-hand and right-hand navigation banners at this page: http://www.dus-int.de/dus_en/b_skytrain/ both say "Sky Train" but the article text itself says "SkyTrain".

Best wishes SimonTrew (talk) 19:57, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tell a lie, the search box on right has "SkyTrain" and does not recognize "Sky Train" on a free text search. So it seems "SkyTrain is the preferred English transliteration. Agree? SimonTrew (talk) 20:14, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

History section's verb tense

It seems to be written strangely (non-native speaker?). Re-write? I'm not the best at writing myself. 67.183.145.155 (talk) 21:22, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Runway length

There is a difference between the runway data in the text and in the infobox. Furthermore the link to references #2 (& #10) is broken. -- Traveletti (talk) 16:01, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Airline Terminals

In the Airlines and destinations section, for those airlines which use multiple terminals, is it possible to segregate the destinations by terminal (perhaps non-Schengen versus Schengen)? Spyenson (talk) 03:00, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image captions

Will someone please learn how to spell "taxiing" in the image captions? Not got time to change them myself (it's practically every single one). Skinsmoke (talk) 08:54, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Warring over AA seasonality

Please note that I've archived both sources so there's unrestrictyed access to them from now on, even when the original urls go dead. However, I don't think they should be kept simultaneously as they include exactly the same information. More specifically, the AA source mirrors the one from PR Newswire. There's no need to have the same sources duplicating the information provided by each other. I've nevertheless kept both of them. It's up to you to decide how this continue, but please stop calling vandalism to edits like these ones: [1], [2]. The word vandalism is a serious offence.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 10:30, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The warring is about the placement and having two sources for the route. The airline originally operated this route as a year-round service but it has been converted to summer seasonal, should the source for the seasonal change be placed after the "seasonal" note or after the destination (the destination has already been noted as "seasonal" so it doesn't matter where the source goes as long as the seasonal note is there) like for all the other seasonal routes? Rzxz1980 (talk) 05:17, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Düsseldorf Airport

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Düsseldorf Airport's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "corendon":

From Friedrichshafen Airport: corendonairlines.com - Flights from Friedrichshafen retrieved 09 August 2019
From Frankfurt Airport: "Flights". corendonairlines.com.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:21, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 13 December 2022

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Nouvelair resuming seasonal flights to Tunis. Source: https://www.aeroroutes.com/eng/221212-bjns23dus 73.254.58.23 (talk) 00:20, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. RealAspects (talk) 11:52, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]