User talk:Nampa DC

Gordon Ramsay

You need to revert your edits and take it to the talk page ~mitch~ (talk) 16:01, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Just to let you know Hell's Kitchen had two episodes filmed there ~ so it does make it a tv show ~ but since Gordon Ramsey is your article I will back off and let you edit as you see fit ~
by the way nice meeting you and thanks for the conversation ~ ~mitch~ (talk) 18:35, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Apologies

My apologies Nampa, I thought you were the "plumber" vandal which is why I reverted you so sorry about that, Happy editing, –Davey2010^Talk 16:46, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Cristiano Ronaldo

I've undone your removal of the highest paid instagram point. Whilst I agree that generally it wouldn't be considered the best source, in this instance it is the most authoritative source on the study as, although the same has appeared in the New York Post, Fox News and TalkSport (amongst others), Buzz Bingo are the originator of the data / creator of the work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Itsfini (talk • contribs) 20:38, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Lionel Messi

Hey Nampa DC, if you want to make an accusation then at least actually look through the edits and you'll realise that I didn't take "one of" out - it was another user. You should take that advice. Isaacsorry (talk) 06:33, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

He is way better than Ronaldo Maxsoa 810 (talk) 18:49, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Messi announced that Qatar 2022 would be his last world cup, I thought it meant he was leaving the national team. Sorry for my mistake.Spectritus (talk) 16:22, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Re:

Hi. I just wanted to say that what you're saying about that article I had originally included in Ronaldo's page isn't entirely correct so just please be careful with checking through the sources in the future when reverting edits; the article is in fact called "The best not to have won the Champions League," and it isn't misleading in that regard, and while I don't agree with all of it, I don't think that it's out of context either, as there's no mention about matches played as you had stated in your edit comment. Also, while I do agree with you that certain players are ranked far too low for my liking in comparions to others (e.g. Ronaldo and Baggio, who should be with Buffon in the top three, seeing as unlike some of the others they are all-time greats, and I don't see how Bergkamp, Campbell, Ibra, or Totti can be ahead of them frankly considering their overall careers), that is my personal opinion, and it is subjective of you or me to say that no–one who knows anything about football would rank certain players above others, as in the end it is from a reliable source and the players are ranked, and this was a journalist's opinion. But seeing as you removed it, I'll leave it out of the Ronaldo wiki article as he isn't listed in the top 10 anyway and there are other articles which already mention that as you said, so it isn't really necessary I suppose. Best regards and happy editing, Messirulez (talk) 17:05, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Yes, but that's still all your opinion, and you are making conjectures based on information which isn't stated in the article. And it isn't an anonymouos source either; it's by Majid Mohamed, who has also written for UEFA before and even the Independent. But as I said I'll leave it out; I just meant if you could please be careful if reverting something you disagree with if it is reliably sourced. There have been things by established pundits that I have disagreed with in the past as well. But yes, I would say that Ronaldo, Baggio, and Buffon are probably the best three players on their list, and some of the best of all time and probably should have been the top three, and if Ronaldo and Baggio had actually had more opportunities to play in the Champions League, as at the time the regulations were different and only league-winners and Champions League winners qualified, I'm sure they would have dominated the competition, as they were both so good in the UEFA Cup and the Cup Winners' Cup, but as I said, that's all my opinion. Best, Messirulez (talk) 13:25, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Zinedine Zidane

Hello Nampa DC, please reconsider undoing those team records that I have posted earlier on Zizou's page because Zidane's other records includes other team records such as unbeaten 40 games as well as 16 game-winning streaks. I feel Zizou's work is under appreciated and his records are overlooked. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abrar188 (talk • contribs) 14:12, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Those records you listed are not notable for a bio of an individual (most number of different scorers etc.). That belongs in an article covering Madrid’s season. Nampa DC (talk) 14:21, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Apologies

Respected Nampa DC,

I want to appeal you a sincere apologies regarding my activity on your page almost 2 months back. The activity was emptying your user page. It was meant to be written on your talk page but as beacause of lack of knowledge, I typed those on your user page but on talk page which forced me to empty it out of puzzlement. Now I earned a bit experience and now I want to let you know my apologies. I am so sorry. Please don't think anything.

Thank You. Ken Tony (talk) 17:52, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Source

According to the UEFA site, this season's ball is used from the third qualifying round until the group stage and it can be read right here: https://www.uefa.com/insideuefa/about-uefa/news/0262-108125aa7213-ea41fa91a319-1000--official-ball-for-2020-21-uefa-champions-league-group-stage-pre/

NEW STATS OF PELE

You obviously don't know that there are new stats of Pele from IFFHS (January 2021). You are not updated. Γεώργιος Τερζής 2 (talk) 16:51, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Lionel Messi "Officially announced by IFFHS as the world's best player of the decade 2011-2020" (Reverting this great official honour from the main text is BIAS)

Hello Nampa DC,

I accept your answer (and of course I absolutely agree with your personal opinion) compared to the totally unfair and biased answer by user nehme1499, who himself reverted my edit. But how is possible that Pele's IFFHS best player of the century is allowed to be written in the main text, whereas Messi's IFFHS best player of the decade is not allowed to be written in the main text ? If Pele's honour only concerns a century -and not all time- (as you said) and it is there in the main text, how is possible that Messi's honour, which concerns a shorter time period (decade), is not there in the main text ? :) And also, if Messi's IFFHS decade honour requires a consensus regarding another player of our time, then Pele's IFFHS century honour doesn't also require a consensus regarding Maradona ?? !! But in that case, it's very well placed there in the main text ! :) Of course I personally think Pele is indeed the best player of the 20th century, but I am only mentioning it as an example. So you can easily understand why I still have the feeling that Wikipedia does not work properly/objectively and it is crystal clear to me that there are double standards. Anyway, I thank you for your response and your time. I wish most users here would be like you.

Friendly, Dim. Nor. 86

Your belief that Maradona was of "Italian" heritage

Hi, I notice you seem to be pushing this notion on the article about Maradona. In Argentina his ancestry and genealogy is well known. It is not a matter of debate. He was not of Italian ancestry. I understand you are likely British and thus do not speak the language of Argentina nor know about its sources. But please, if there is a mistake in one of your newspapers about an Argentine it does not trump the academic consensus of all of Argentina. I therefore kindly request you do not press this matter any further. Otherwise we can take it to arbitration where it can be rapidly resolved. Maradona simply did not have Italian heritage. Nor was he "Guarani", although no doubt as many Argentines he may have had some NA genetic admixture -something which is irrelevant since he never took a DNA test. Historian734 (talk) 19:40, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

I couldn’t care less what his heritage is. I’m only interested in what is accurate. The sources provided do not meet that criteria. Others have previously added Croatian (and others) with no reliable sources, so this is not a new issue. Because it’s contentious this needs to gain consensus in the Maradona talk page, BEFORE anything is added to the article. Nampa DC (talk) 00:19, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Nampa DC You clearly care deeply about this topic if you are actively spreading misinformation on wikipedia, refusing to engage in the talk page and ignoring every single source on the topic - all of which are reliable Argentine sources. Please I would suggest you desist from this disruptive editing or we will have to take this to a noticeboard. If the problem is that you don't speak Spanish and refuse to use adequate translation tools to read sources I suggest you do not edit articles related to Latin America. Thank you. Historian734 (talk) 18:30, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Muhammad Ali

Hi. There is a discussion about the edit you reverted. Please join in and explain your thinking.--Jahalive (talk) 18:01, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Ronaldo (R9)

Hello. His behavior is extremely copied after he came to football. You just got my word on the reason of edit 'influence' and put in whatever cloud thought you had and redirected me to the "Farewell match and sporadic appearances" as justification. What is that for? You can see Messi and Cristiano Ronaldo doing the same AFTER Ronaldo did. This has to be visible and outlined, not shadowed. Old players do HAVE to be noticed about their contribution to football, whether Garrincha or Cruijff, and when I mentioned that I mean due to with the same strength the editors here have put in Messi's or Cristiano's articles first lines, the same behavior should be considered and extremely encouraged for someone who *changed* an attacking behavior perception leading to the next players to follow his practice for the currently known football attacking style. 00:43, 20 May 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcus Diniz (talk • contribs)

Ronaldo

Lionel Messi, a good article, features comments about links with other clubs, various debuts, and various comments from players. If you remove the comment from Hierro, you should probably also remove the comments from... Quinton Fortune(!), Youri Djorkaeff, Jose Mourinho, Paolo Maldini, Zinedine Zidane, Michael Owen, Clarence Seedorf, Silvio Berlusconi, John Motson, Kaka, Fabio Cannavaro, all the journalists. Agreed? All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 23:58, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia

Hi Nampa DC! Thank you for your edits to Germany. It looks like you've copied or moved text from List of German inventions and discoveries into that page, and while you are welcome to do so, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. If you've copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thanks! DanCherek (talk) 11:39, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality of the reference.

Hello there is Times Bulletin a good news source to cover? Boti2481 (talk) 11:26, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Sammy Davis

Davis was a singer & entertainer...so why the F would a pic of him @ a politicai, civil rights march on Washington DC go under career, rather than politcal activism ?!? R u 14 years old ?! Peace is contagious (talk) 07:43, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Pelé

What are your grounds for mass reverting the additions to the lede on Pelé? I do not understand how you think these contributions represent a "mess"? Ntrkz (talk) 14:48, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

overlinking

What constitutes overlinking? What are the guidelines for linking?

Dubai Super Cup

You have reverted on the grounds the cup isn't listed by the club/not notable enough. Don't think that is a good enough reason to revert because the London Sheriff isn't listed by club/not very notable yet consensus has been for that to be included. What's the difference? Maybe it can be included in minor titles section?

Perhaps take it to the talk page and get some views/consensus. If inputs from other editors agree it shouldn't be included, then so be it

ThanksKoppite1 (talk) 08:28, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

July 2022

Hi Nampa DC! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Zlatan Ibrahimović that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. TylerBurden (talk) 06:30, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Removal of maintenance templates - WP:DISCUSSCONSENSUS

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Democracy. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Freoh (talk) 22:35, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Edit Warring

Your recent editing history at Ronaldo (Brazilian footballer) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 80.193.80.241 (talk) 09:53, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Template:Infobox football tournament

Hello,

the parameters 'most apperances' and 'top goalscorer' appeared, but the function was deleted by another user on the template ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Infobox_football_tournament ) itself.

The parameters are also mentioned on the page in the article there and would only have to be integrated as a function.

Is there a specific reason these two parameters should not appear? Miria~01 (talk) 21:58, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Opinion

Greetings Nampa DC! You're repeatedly removing some very relevant informations; this type of informations are present in similar articles of other football legends. Is your removal as per WP: REMOVAL or any other policy of our community? Or, Is there any consensus among the editors? Thanks.CharlesWain (talk) 17:06, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Please participate in discussion for Lionel Messi, instead of unilaterally removing content and edit warring. Please see WP:3RR. Waiting for your reply. Thanks.CharlesWain (talk) 17:54, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

A brownie for you!

Hey - Thanks for expanding the footnote in Lionel Messi's article! I was genuinely interested on why the game wasn't counted. Great to know now, much appreciated! MX (✉ • ✎) 20:09, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

World Cup

Just a note, I raised the issue of 32 teams vs. 48 on Talk:FIFA World Cup. Would appreciate your response there--thanks! Meelar (talk) 16:13, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Removal of Pele tributes

Please refrain from removing my edits without discussing first.

When comparing to footballers of similar stature, such as Maradona, the current tribute section for Pele looks sparse. I'm inclined to add further tributes such as the minutes silence, Premier League wearing black arm bands etc etc Please see Maradona tributes as a comparison.

If you have any issues with this, please discuss or perhaps take it to the talk page.

Many thanks

Koppite1 (talk) 19:39, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Lionel Messi

Hello Nampa!

I changed title of section "First Ballon d'Or" for original one which was used for much longer time years ago because of Messi's first Ballon d'Or did not reffer particularly to 09-10 season but was for 2009 year and that topic of quite vague time would more fit into season 08-09, NOT 09-10 thich is used in the title in that case anyway.

Also, what I can see, FWIW there was never consensus to which award should pick into title section (see here earlier: [1]). I am Messi fan and I make a lot of good edits about this playr but I really do not thnik it is neccesary to put titles like "record Ballon d Or" or "First Ballon d Or", "record of FIFA awards" etc. in the TITLES especially due to NPOV issues and editorial content in the title, not mention about vaguity of time that awards which is not suitable for the title. We can always also start discussion at wikiproject and wait what other think but one issue is, "who we are to decide that Ballon d Or is more important than FIFA player of the year or all other Messi's success which are not mentioned in the TITLES (record of having most best player of FIFA World Cup in history, for exmple) but are fairly covered in whole ontent of the article under titles. Please, let take care about that. Both individual awards are mentioned in the section and none is now picked into the title to keep both equel.

Many thanks!

Dawid2009 (talk) 20:54, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Removing edits without discussion

Please refrain from removing edits without discussion. You seem to have a habit of doing this. For your information, the grand prix l'academie des sport is arguably France's most prestigious award. Also, if Budweiser Man of the Match awards are included on the pages of other footballers, then i don't see why Budweiser's Man of History award can't be included on Pele's page. If you have any issues, use talk page first.

Thanks. Koppite1 (talk) 21:38, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Your recent edit on Lionel Messi

Greetings. I noticed you edited and removed information regarding Lionel Messi based on him winning the 2022 Finalissima for Argentina. I want to know what was the reason for making that edit, and what is wrong with saying he won the 2022 Finalissima as he was the captain of that match. Thanks No2WesternImperialism (talk) 16:31, 1 April 2023 (UTC).

2022–23: Regaining form

Hi Nampa! If you don't mind, can you add 2023 to the sentence "On 26 February (added here), PSG defeated Marseille 3–0 in Le Classique..." under the heading 2022–23: Regaining form in the article Lionel Messi? It will avoid confusing readers. Please help me! Hongkytran (talk) 13:20, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

June 2023

Your recent editing history at Liverpool F.C. shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bbb23 (talk) 14:56, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Lionel Messi article length

Hey there. While I agree with your idea of creating two articles for Messi's club career and international career, it would also be a good idea, I think, if his article was cleaned up a little bit as well. I added the WP:TOOLONG tag as it exceeds the number of words allowed by like 6,000. Also, it can help improve an article considerably and make it easier to read on a whole. -- Omnis Scientia (talk) 18:07, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)