User talk:Estnot

Estnot, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Estnot! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Third opinion

Hi Estnot, and thank you for seeking out third opinions. I have declined two of your requests. One, Talk:The Battle at Lake Changjin#Historical inaccuracies section removal is too new a discussion for listing at WP:3O. The guidance says "Before making a request here, be sure that the issue has been thoroughly discussed on the article talk page. 3O is only for assistance in resolving disagreements that have come to a standstill."

The other request I declined, Talk:United States#Lead change, had the same issue. Additionally, a third editor has joined the discussion since your request.

Your third request is still pending, though I did remove your signature, as we ask that 3O requests not include usernames. Thanks, Firefangledfeathers (talk) 03:53, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

got it and thank for the notice Estnot (talk) 10:45, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also

I blocked that other account; I think you know what I mean. You made one edit and tried to log in a few times--please stick to this one, OK? Pinging 331dot, for the record. Drmies (talk) 15:08, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

hi User:Drmies yes as you correctly pointed out I forgot the password on that account which is why I created this one. I had no intention of using that account to engage in sockpuppetry

on a related note, since you appear to have checkuser rights, would it be possible that you could have a look at this [1] and do a checkuser scan on the editors involved? I was told by El_C to file a report at SPI but perhaps things could be sped up if you did it seeing as how you, a user with checkuser privileges, are already here. Estnot (talk) 19:16, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Turns out there was something to it. But next time, PLEASE indicate, rather than suggesting "this IP might be this editor", what the actual problem is: there needs to be some kind of disruption to warrant CU, and in this case I had to go look for it myself. You can see the block I placed; Sinwiki has nothing to do with any of it. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 22:13, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I thought I had made this clear by directing you to the section on El_C’s page which explained the whole thing (the disruption) in detail? Estnot (talk) 01:18, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It was not a very clear explanation. What you need to do to make it easy is to link specific diffs from different editors to each other, for instance, and explaining what the policy violation is--"consistently fail to write content in a neutral way" just isn't very much to go on. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 16:06, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ok and I will make a note of this next time. Thanks for your guidance Estnot (talk) 16:20, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal for removing a website from blacklist

I'm DrSatyendra21, I've talked about a website thearticle.online , that this website is should be removed from Wikipedia blacklist and till now there is no action taken. If someone is here to help me then reply me so I can talk further. I'm waiting for it. DrSatyendra21 (talk) 17:37, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hi User:DrSatyendra21 thanks for reaching out to me but unfortunately I don’t have the knowledge to help you out on this issue. Estnot (talk) 17:41, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Waskerton per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Waskerton. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 21:07, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]