Talk:KTUL

KTUL is currently a Television good article nominee. Nominated by Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) at 17:33, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the good article instructions.)

Short description: TV station in Tulsa, Oklahoma, U.S.

Television: Stations

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force.

Oklahoma: Tulsa Mid‑importance

	Oklahoma portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oklahoma on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OklahomaWikipedia:WikiProject OklahomaTemplate:WikiProject OklahomaOklahoma articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Task-force Tulsa.

Untitled

Is that list of former personalites serious? come on people.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Cup2avs9601 (talk • contribs)

Hmmmm.....seems like we have a disgruntled former employee on our hands. So sad. I'm considering not even bothering to post warning templates on the talk page of the vandal with the wandering IP number who appears to be obsessed with this article. I think in future I'll simply gain my satisfaction by watching those dull old nuggets get reverted fairly quickly by someone, if I'm lucky I'll get to do it myself, this silly game apparently will never end, oh well. Have fun. Deconstructhis (talk) 19:35, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a former employee and not disgruntled at all! KTUL-TV (Kent Doll) gave me my first TV job out of college. As a radio/TV major at OU, I was thrilled to be able to get started in my home town market, even though I was a studio camera operator. I've now been in television for over 30 years! I wonder what ever happened to Mary Rose? She was married to Charley Rose at the time and I ran camera for her when whe was the weekend co-anchor. Mark Solow —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.74.233.233 (talk) 19:46, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material

Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:

WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information." As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.
As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced.
WP:NLIST tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article.
Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.

If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable. Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 05:07, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

KTUL TV had Univision in 1989-90?

According to a Youtube video (KTUL-TV Spanish-language commercials, search for it on Youtube), KTUL-TV was most likely a part time Univision affiliate around 1989 and 1990 based on what I found, but I can't say for sure this is verifiable enough. The video's commercials tend to come from Miami, Florida and this tells me it was a satellite feed from their Univision affiliate. The article does not say KTUL-TV has an Univision subchannel right now either and Univision in Tulsa is on KUTU-CD 25. 2605:E000:FDCA:4200:613F:2DF8:D15B:5AA2 (talk) 22:48, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on KTUL. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:15, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 10 November 2021

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I need to remove a show on Programming that is no longer on the station, please. UnionOK (talk) 16:01, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:27, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 20 February 2022

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

"most television sets on the retail market then were not equipped with UHF tuners (this situation would not change until after the FCC passed the All-Channel Receiver Act into law in 1961)."

The FCC does not pass legislation. Congresscritters pass legislation.

Furthermore, the law may have been passed in 1961, but the requirement that new TV's actually have the tuners only took effect starting with the 1964 models. 66.102.87.40 (talk) 19:49, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Bsoyka (talk · contribs) 16:11, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]