Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2022/04

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2022

01 April 2022

Reason: Far too many anonymous IPs are reverting edits to the page Pratish_K (talk) 18:17, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Looks like things have calmed down. No disruption in the last 48 hrs. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:29, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – this biography subject is being atatcked. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:15, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Already pending changes protected. The level of editing does not justify any increase in protection at this time. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:31, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Persistent blanking of content in lead, addition of new content without discussion at talk. Hobomok (talk) 19:58, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:34, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Ongoing effort to replace the plot of this film with the plot of the 1967 film. Skywatcher68 (talk) 22:52, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 23:01, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection. HelpmePlsWhy (talk) 22:27, 31 March 2022 (UTC) Indefinite semi-protection. HelpmePlsWhy (User:HelpmePlsWhy) 22:27, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done No evidence of disruptive editing and we do not protect pages preemptively. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:30, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I just don't want people editing it HelpmePlsWhy (talk) 22:32, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
As a general rule, people don't edit other users' pages. Talk pages are for communication but user pages are your own space provided you stay within our guidelines. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:37, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by the range of IPs. Dove's talk (talk) 00:39, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty low edit rate on the whole, so Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 01:05, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP changing the article body hugely usually the article has more connection with the change. @@@XyX talk 00:47, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Low edit rate on the whole, so instead went Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 01:07, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – continued vandalism and WP:BLP issues since most recent page protection expired. Toddst1 (talk) 01:20, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 01:58, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An editor suggested this to me on my talk page as the page has seen incorrect changes in content recently. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:35, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 02:37, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I would like to remove present vandalism then re-protect page Standwithukraina (talk) 22:48, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – Muboshgu (talk) 23:13, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page will inevitably be vandalized. Instead of editors pranking the page, have the page prank the editors by not allowing them to edit. Imagine the look on their faces when they have been April Fooled!. Painting17 (talk) 00:05, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Sigh... Ad Orientem (talk) 00:08, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – continuous removal of cited content by various IPs. Wikipelli Talk 00:09, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:12, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by multiple IP users in the March. Tiger (Talk) 02:46, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:22, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – You name it, people have done it to this page. Black Lives Matter got indefinite semi for the same reason. It seems that the people who wanted to vandalise (or just disruptively edit) that page have all come here instead. Asking for indefinite this time because it’s already been protected numerous times in the past and each time, the disruptive editors have returned as soon as protection expires. Helen(💬📖) 03:17, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Ks0stm (TCGE) 03:25, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. InterstateFive  (talk) - just another roadgeek 03:21, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quite a history of protection, so Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 03:27, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Dronebogus (talk) 01:02, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Ks0stm (TCGE) 01:10, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism by accounts changing the picture to the Ugly Dolls poster. It's a featured article, we have to move quick because this vandal is on wikipedia changing stuff right now. Please semi-protect this article as soon as possible. SteelerFan1933 (talk) 01:15, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. SteelerFan1933 has NOT been blocked (got lucky with 5 reverts), and sockpuppet User:I got no one else has been indeffed (been dealt with). I've taken the liberty of mildly chastising my mentee SteelerFan1933, who is filled with BOLD but still learning CIVIL. BusterD (talk) 02:41, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@BusterD: Not to step on any toes here, but how did you get edit warring from that? I see clear cut image vandalism and reverts of said vandalism; I blocked You and no one else (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) (User:Ad Orientem removed talk access) and I got no one else (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) as vandalism-only accounts, rather than for edit warring. The only reason I deferred on semi-protecting the page for persistent vandalism is because it's today's featured article. Ks0stm (TCGE) 02:51, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that SteelerFan1933 was reverting clear vandalism; I'm admonishing them for trying to handle it by themselves (my mentee, my responsibility). I myself have made poorer choices, but it's a bad habit to start, without a fuller understanding. We appreciate your block of the malefactor. SF1933 and I will discuss a better way to deal with these issues in the future. It is entirely possible I should have stayed off this board at all and let another admin deal with it. I am not involved in the pagespace, but I am mildly involved as mentor. BusterD (talk) 03:04, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP range edit-warring with offensive edit summaries. DonIago (talk) 05:41, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 05:56, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page is being vandalized by User DedicatedFollower13 and other IP. Instead of editors adding additions and sources to the page, they are simply deleting articles and its sources and links, please make this page secure. Amanjol (talk) 03:04, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Talk page has not been used by anyone, ever. El_C 03:27, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Perennial LTA target. Blake Gripling (talk) 06:20, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 08:35, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: There appears to be a lot of recent editing and reverting, including by IP addresses, due to having Donald Trump as one of the examples. Some level of protection might be a good idea. Gusfriend (talk) 07:52, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 08:45, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP continuing to edit war immediately after block. Mellk (talk) 08:39, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 08:48, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repetitious IP vandalism, from two IPs. I don’t know if this is one person who can somehow change their IP (although I saw that the first IP address had previously vandalized two other articles almost a year ago) or if multiple people got together and decided to do this to amuse themselves for some reason. I’ve never requested page protection this way before, but the other way isn’t working, so hopefully this works.VictimOfEntropy (talk) 08:47, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 08:51, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism resumed immediately upon expiration of protection. dizzyflamingo (talk) 05:11, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:04, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent edit warring by IP user, along with uncivil edit summaries, which they have been warned for on another article by User:C.Fred. BilCat (talk) 05:19, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 05:56, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Moderate level of partisan vandalism. Subject matter of the article is running in the Philippine presidential elections this May. Maximum one month of semi-protection would be recommended if possible. Nuwordlife0rder (talk) 09:04, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 09:09, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. twotwofourtysix(My talk page and contributions) 09:08, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quite an extensive history of protection, so Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 09:11, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection Unnecessary drive-by restorations by the same user without waiting for conclusion of the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ukraine#Far-right politics in Ukraine. Segaton (talk) 06:11, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 08:55, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ks0stm: please note that consensus appears to be very much against the user who requested protection [1]. Volunteer Marek 09:19, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
So it would seem, but at the same time we can't have edit warring going on, so I was hoping to nip that in the bud. Tell you what, though, if they want to edit war I'll give them the rope. Hopefully they can refrain from using it, or they'll end up at AN3. Ks0stm (TCGE) 09:29, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed Ks0stm. I've summed up what's been going on in my latest comment (1 April) on the talkpage discussion. Thanks. ~Asarlaí 11:16, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. Independently of this request and prior full protections. El_C 10:59, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism that only seems to have gained steam since Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2022/04#Coropuna was filed. It's possible that this might stop of its own accord once the article stops appearing on the main page, but it could also be a the result of a previously indeffed editor hopping IPs simply to continue their disruption. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:03, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The IPs seem to have stopped so perhaps the increased interest in the article had more to do with it being on the main page than anything else. PP seems unwarranted at this time so this request can probably be closed. — Marchjuly (talk) 10:31, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. My experience with main-page articles is that it rarely gets better over the day they're on. As people in different timezones wake up, and their first looks go to Wikipedias mainpage...followed by postings for the lulz before getting up, so to speak. Might be exacerbated by it being April 1st. Lectonar (talk) 11:13, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism from IP and newly created account (probably it's the same recently blocked user who made the same kind of edits). Xexerss (talk) 10:44, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 10:48, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Venkat TL (talk) 11:56, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Give me a shout if you need the duration modifying. Girth Summit (blether) 12:18, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pls, as a student I want to join the forum,I just want to acquire knowledge and share knowledge.like it's said "no knowledge is a waste and knowledge is power".😔😶. please!!!!!!!!!!! 105.112.105.123 (talk) 17:03, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Malformed request - which page are you requesting an edit to? Zippybonzo | talk 18:11, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Page not specified. Lectonar (talk) 09:17, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2409:4073:4D82:597A:0:0:C9:600 (talk) 08:03, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Page not specified. Lectonar (talk) 09:17, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2409:4073:4D82:597A:0:0:C9:600 (talk) 08:04, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Collection is only 80 cr not 200 cr

Declined Page not specified. Lectonar (talk) 09:18, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page is constantly being vandalized by DedicatedFollower13 and other IP. previously added links to sources from other editors are removed... Please protect this page! with hope and respect, Amanjol (talk) 04:49, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator PhilKnight. El_C 09:08, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. El_C 09:26, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. wizzito | say hello! 11:18, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I went Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If the burden of edits is too high for pending changes feel free to re-request semi-protection. Ks0stm (TCGE) 13:37, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent addition of unsourced content by IPs — DaxServer (t · m · c) 12:52, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Due to the extensive history of semi-protection I went Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 13:33, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Adding of poorly unsourced content in over past days. Fade258 (talk) 13:21, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Considering the page has been semi-protected about 14 times in the last 2-3 years, Semi-protected indefinitely. Ks0stm (TCGE) 13:29, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated BLP Violations by IP's. Kyohyi (talk) 14:22, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:52, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: logged WP:ARBBLP --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:52, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. New target for the 'punches you in the face' person since their others got protected. Interestingly, one of the socks has a very familiar name, I don't know why... Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 13:53, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ks0stm (TCGE) 14:07, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
All targets Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 14:07, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – By the range of IPs. Dove's talk (talk) 14:11, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 14:22, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Asking for protection of my PGP key page so that it cannot be edited or changed. This helps ensure that it is truly my valid key. Expiry should be on October 4th, 2023 as that is when this key expires and I will need to update it. MrAureliusRTalk! 03:49, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MrAureliusR, consider placing your key on a .css page in your userspace, like User:ToBeFree/s.css. Such files are protected more strongly than full protection: They can only be edited by interface administrators... and you. Perfect, I'd say. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 05:58, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Number of disruptive edits. Fade258 (talk) 05:19, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 12:32, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism. DevSpenpai::talk 12:44, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:57, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:57, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Additions of poorly-sourced material on BLP page. SWinxy (talk) 15:40, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 16:52, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPS/new users are changing the genre from mythological to historical without sources; borderline political/contentious. Ab207 (talk) 15:47, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, give me a chance to write it! Erm: Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:55, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. 38% of the past 50 edits are vandalism. Reason I'm suggesting indefinite is because there have been 7 past protections, the most recent of which was for a whole year. InterstateFive  (talk) - just another roadgeek 16:11, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 17:01, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent vandalism, always by IP accounts that add the same fictional content (an fictitious calendar for the following season-now its happening with a so called 2023 calendar, but happened in past with 2022, 2021 and so on). I propose Semi-protection. Rpo.castro (talk) 16:20, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:03, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple new and IP editors vandalizing article. Schazjmd (talk) 16:26, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:05, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 14:11, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Fade258 (talk) 15:12, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There has been one disruptive edit since February 18. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:20, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – DE resumed immediately after page protection expiration. wizzito | say hello! 17:30, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 17:34, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Fade258 (talk) 05:32, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ks0stm (TCGE) 15:50, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IPs adding copyrighted material, thinly sourced allegations with lurid language to a BLP article Hemantha (talk) 11:20, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:44, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Once semi expires, spamming resumes. TrangaBellam (talk) 12:15, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:50, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – almost all edits from IPs are unconstructive or unsourced. wizzito | say hello! 18:01, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Ks0stm (TCGE) 19:43, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Upcoming awards show article with disruptive editing mainly coming from IPs. May be a good idea to protect the article for a little over a week so there is not more disruptive editing from IPs during the actual airing of the show next Saturday night. Magitroopa (talk) 18:14, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 19:52, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – constant LTA activity, etc. wizzito | say hello! 18:45, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Ks0stm (TCGE) 19:42, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

02 April 2022

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Fade258 (talk) 16:27, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. However we follow him on an emotion rollorcoster ride of emotions — that's right, low-hanging fruit over here (I'm terrible). El_C 17:07, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edits from IPs changing Rozman's title to "GM" after an April Fool's joke. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 20:02, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 20:05, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly Visible template. LucasKannou (talk) 19:32, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated additions of fancruft by IP editors. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 18:02, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Only a handful of recent edits from IPs. Looks like a lot of the challenged edits are coming from more experienced editors. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:13, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@TenPoundHammer: Semi-protection would be ineffective against the recent additions of fancruft (the editor(s) involved are extended-confirmed). This is a content dispute. Please encourage other editors to discuss on the talk page and remind them of WP:BURDEN to add material. Otherwise you can request full protection to lock the page while the content dispute is being resolved. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:16, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. IP socking Sajaypal007 (talk) 18:44, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:14, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent controversy around actions pertaining to religion and potential for edit-warring warrant extended-confirmed protection. (talk) 20:36, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:08, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Being the defense minister of a country engaged in conflict, this article is prone to edit-warring and other forms of inaccuracy and bias. Request for at least semi-protection if not extended-confirmed protection. (talk) 20:42, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:09, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. M.Bitton (talk) 01:21, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:01, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:01, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Immediately after PP expired, vandalism resumed. dizzyflamingo (talk) 04:52, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 05:54, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP users change Children parameter (infobox) without providing a reliable source. Mann Mann (talk) 06:02, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 06:15, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Vandalism after protection expired – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 01:16, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 07:56, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: ISP edit warring, persistant vandalism since protection was removed in Jan 2022. Over 100 edits on this page in the last two days making it extremetly difficult to pick through what are good faith edits and which are vandalism. I reverted to the version at the time the last protection expired. Blue Riband► 04:41, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 07:58, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – We have a lot of IPs and new accounts either vandalising or adding unsourced or speculative information. We also have frequent changes of the article image to copyrighted images. However, we do still have some IPs providing good contributions, I think pending changes is appropriate here, much like the main Formula One article. FozzieHey (talk) 08:05, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 08:10, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 04:28, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ks0stm (TCGE) 05:50, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – User being reported is making fake reports as vengeance. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 04:38, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ks0stm (TCGE) 05:50, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Persistent target of vandalism and DE. Looking at the page history, I can't even tell when the last constructive edit was. Curbon7 (talk) 08:22, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alternatively, semi works as well. Curbon7 (talk) 08:24, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Strangely for such a potential ip contribution magnet, there's no previous protection log, so let's start with brief semi-protection. We'll keep eyes on it and if we need to escalate we will. Looking at prior months there might be a bit too much editing traffic for pending changes to be maximally effective. BusterD (talk) 08:31, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 05:11, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done I'll keep an eye on it and if they really cross the line I or another admin will block their talk page access. Ks0stm (TCGE) 05:52, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've warned both FilmandTVFan28 and Armegon. They need to leave the blocked user's talk page alone. As I note here, both of their conduct has been subpar. Which is to say, even if a user is NOTHERE, that does give license to also violate policy in response. @Ks0stm: courtesy ping. El_C 07:30, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP editor frequently reverting edits. Many times, they implement non-neutral, non-encyclopedic language (across-the-board usage of endonyms which aren't commonly recognized in English, using the verb "understood" instead of "believed" in the context of subjective belief systems, etc.), but they have also reverted minor copy edits for no apparent reason. Noahfgodard (talk) 05:57, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Noahfgodard: I have given the editor a soft edit warring warning so that they (hopefully) discuss their changes on the talk page instead of revert again, but if they start to edit war with you feel free to take them to WP:AN3 or WP:ANI. Other than that one editor the amount of disruption wasn't enough to justify protection at the moment. Ks0stm (TCGE) 06:12, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
79.26.12.189 (talk) 10:28, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:38, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:38, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – No reason to edit the IP user this page. currently IP making disruptive editing this page. HurricaneEdgar 12:29, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This should be addressed to an arbitration clerk. Bbb23 (talk) 12:35, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: A girls gotta have some fun. I revdel'd FWIW. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:53, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:05, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – obviously... Wretchskull (talk) 13:12, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:23, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Is anybody out there, anybody there // Does anybody wonder, anybody care --Def Leppard --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:23, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Better to let someone else do the asking...and of course we do care a lot...Lectonar (talk) 14:03, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:05, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Every April Fools day people try to mess around with this page. I'd suggest indefinite XCON or temporary full protection to prevent pranks from being played on this page. Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis 15:48, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a billion years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:58, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@El C I hope you could see this was not a joke though. :) Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis 02:57, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Never! El_C 07:51, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Shut up! El_C 17:34, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:37, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Recmmend nominating @El C: for deletion , and eating more fresh fruit! --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:06, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I just had a Minneola! El_C 22:22, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:06, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article on high-profile ongoing internet event being vandalized by multiple IPs. Giraffer (talk·contribs) 09:58, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:29, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated block evasion and vandalism after previous protections, see protection log and page history. Giraffer (talk·contribs) 10:04, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:34, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:34, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Dan arndt tried to vandalize it. Ayhan Viaene 9360 (talk) 11:05, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done OP unhappy that DAn nominated it for deletion. OP is partially blocked for removing AfD template. OP encouraged to discuss at AfD and to make edit request on article talk. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:42, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Nearly all recent edits by IP addresses since at least January have been adding spam links. Article is infrequently edited so this can be tacked with appropriate pending changes, like other articles subject to spam links such as Commercial cleaning. FozzieHey (talk) 13:20, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:37, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism stretching back to March 27. IPs are from Serbia and are likely dynamic. Lazman321 (talk) 14:18, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:33, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. wizzito | say hello! 15:08, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:17, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent target of an LTA (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dusty8686). wizzito | say hello! 15:13, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:20, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent target of an LTA (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dusty8686). wizzito | say hello! 15:14, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:22, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Venkat TL (talk) 14:03, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:38, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated unexplained attempts by IP users to change the correct runtime, this has been persistent since last December. InfiniteNexus (talk) 17:20, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:22, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a trade. Swagging (talk) 17:47, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:57, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 14:40, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:36, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring a lot recently. Pavlov2 (talk) 18:10, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

: Already protected by administrator Cullen328. Less Unless (talk) 19:11, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unsourced edits by IPs/new users resumed immediately after the last protection expired. Ab207 (talk) 18:28, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 19:14, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopping by banned sock puppet [2] with a long history of religious pov pushing by using a variety of non-WP:RS as well as WP:RS which don't support the added text. HistoryofIran (talk) 09:31, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The pages is constantly being vandalized by User:DedicatedFollower13 and User:2003:D1:CF0D:2A10:F0CC:94D5:7900:161 other IPs. Previously added links to sources from other editors are removed by him and sources that do not support the text are added ... He, with his actions and personal opinions, incites hatred and war between Shiites and Sunnis. Please protect this page! Amanjol (talk) 10:19, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Applies to all three articles. MelanieN (talk) 19:28, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent edit warring between anonymous IPs adding content that violates WP:NPOV. Yiosie2356 09:56, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I already wrote to you in your talk page, why are you requesting a semi-protection page? And why are you reverting perfect edits to satisfy potential biased vandals and block evaders? There was no violation of neutrality/non-neutrality and you know that. Why are you asking now for unnecessary semi-protection and why don't you respond to me in your talk page? Anyway, I already fixed the section to satisfy parts in disagreement and made it even more neutral and also shorter.

Presistant ISP edit warring. The following ISPs, and one named account, have made no other Wikipedia edits except to this article:
151.44.78.107 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
77.162.37.188 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
151.44.93.181 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Sparrowbeach (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
2601:80:4500:43B2:FCD3:E457:3D85:5BF (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
2603:301B:98:F000:740E:6C52:D935:A04E (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
94.36.29.229 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)Blue Riband► 11:58, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:35, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Exact same guy back socking once he got autoconfirmed on new account. More protection would be useful now it has expired. 10mmsocket (talk) 14:56, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:38, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism. wizzito | say hello! 18:34, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sounds like the kids ran out of things to do during Spring Break. MelanieN (talk) 19:41, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Jinnifer. Binksternet (talk) 19:31, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Most recent problem user was blocked, but there are undoubtedly more where that came from. MelanieN (talk) 19:44, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism. LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan) 19:34, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24h, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. firefly ( t · c ) 20:18, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:23, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:37, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Maria23vini (talk) 20:54, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Wug·a·po·des 21:12, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continuous high level of IP vandalism and disruptive edits. Dhruv edits (talk) 11:33, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:47, 2 April 2022 (UTC): Note: As gentler than blocking the IP's who had not been warned till I did. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:47, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:55, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recurrent, although not very frequent, IP vandalism. I think this should be indefinitely semi-protected as I don't see a benefit from IPs and new accounts editing this page and would prevent vandalism. A. C. SantacruzPlease ping me! 11:56, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:00, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Cyberbot, you are working to hard. Cool it, or I'll be forced to report you to the shop steward. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:00, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:55, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:17, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:42, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: O.K. cyberbot-- one hour corffee breaks? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:42, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:55, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring, IP joined in. tgeorgescu (talk) 12:50, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:41, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Content disputes involving fully vested users requires full protect. Edit requests can be made to restore the correct version. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:41, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:55, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mellk (talk) 14:02, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:35, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: May need [{WP:ARBEE]] --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:35, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:55, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recreation of salted draft in talk. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:11, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Wug·a·po·des 21:22, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

03 April 2022

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Dronebogus (talk) 21:02, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Agirlie54455 (talk · contribs). Wug·a·po·des 21:10, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. dizzyflamingo (talk) 21:46, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Wug·a·po·des 22:03, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Between 250 and 2500 transclusions should be semi-protected. LucasKannou (talk) 05:19, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. High-risk templates is a guideline, not a strict rule. The template is stable, has few watchers, and part of our licensing infrastructure. Vandalism would have a serious impact while being difficult to notice, and the stability of the template means changes would be rare. The benefits of lowering protection are outweighed by the potential for disruption. Anyone may make an edit request on the talk page. Wug·a·po·des 21:05, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP-hopping user edit warring. Donald Albury 23:51, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 00:45, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Heavy vandalism from anonymous accounts. vampirekitty5 (talk page) 02:17, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 02:37, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Multiple IPs vandalising and adding BLP violations to this article. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 02:30, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 02:40, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. iAdnan (talk) 22:16, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. The existing draft has been declined and the page deleted multiple times. Recreation is rightly restricted to extended confirmed editors. Wug·a·po·des 22:32, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. – IP-hopping user edit warring (46.196.94.19). Posible SockPuppet IP. Page was edited before by NafisFuadAyon Checkuserblock-Account , User:Borskindlu (Proven SP), and lessers IPs of Gala19000; Once Blocked IP 1, Once Blocked IP 2. Mr.User200 (talk) 00:03, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Emphasis on the recent: Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Feel free to re-request protection or take it to WP:AN3 if edit warring resumes. Ks0stm (TCGE) 00:51, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Arbitration Enforcement. WP:ARBEE Curbon7 (talk) 02:56, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 03:02, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism over the last three weeks of article on a movie that is controversial in India. IP vandalism occurred within 10 minutes of my most recent reversion to less blatantly offensive version. WhinyTheYounger (WtY)(talk, contribs) 02:56, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 05:08, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Getting persistent vandalism from a bunch of IPs all starting with 181.176, I'd assume too much collateral to block so temporary protection seems like the best route here. Bsoyka (talk) 04:04, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 05:11, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nochiern (talk) 05:06, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 05:18, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. dizzyflamingo (talk) 05:33, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 05:40, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism since March 30, 2022. Cassiopeia talk 06:58, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:31, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 07:11, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:30, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Addition of copyright violations that have nothing to do with the actual content of the page. DanCherek (talk) 16:57, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:21, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:21, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: copyvio revdel'd --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:21, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:18, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive IP edit warring against multiple users. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 04:10, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:36, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive vandalism by IP accounts.  Hamza Ali Shah  10:13, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 10:16, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Proxy IP block evasion. CMD (talk) 06:45, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:41, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent continued vandalism by user with multiple IPs. Mellk (talk) 10:19, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:24, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Volten001 11:24, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 11:42, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. 2001:4455:30B:6C00:FC40:12EE:915F:4BC4 (talk) 10:43, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:12, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Volten001 13:26, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:41, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page is being left outdated for a very long time due to its level of protection, please consider reducing the protection level so everyone could edit and update the page. Thank you. Subulakshmi (talk) 03:10, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The edit history of the page very much disagrees with this assessment CreecregofLife (talk) 03:12, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Favonian (talk) 10:41, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Esbzay (talk) 08:52, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done – No article specified. Favonian (talk) 10:42, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There are frequent disputes and page edits over whether or not to display the name under which she was born (Einar Wegener) and originally worked as a painter. KateS01 (talk) 07:34, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Stale. Last edit Feb 26. El_C 13:05, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long term vandalism. Pavlov2 (talk) 11:03, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. PC protection seems like it is working, not enough constant disruptive edits to warrant semi-protection. -- LuK3 (Talk) 11:43, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent vandalism by unregistered users.

Dif 1 Dif 2 Dif 3 Hey man im josh (talk) 15:33, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:36, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. wizzito | say hello! 15:52, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Disruption looks to be showing up about once a week with an overall low rate of editing. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:31, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. 30% of the past 50 edits are vandalism. interstatefive  (talk) - just another roadgeek 16:02, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24h, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. firefly ( t · c ) 16:31, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . 47.213.224.164 (talk) 12:50, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Bbb23 (talk) 13:22, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 13:31, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:42, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:42, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See: [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]. — Shibbolethink ( ) 16:25, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is not going to be a short term issue. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:29, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ad Orientem FWIW I was about to protect for a year under the WP:ARBEE DS - is that worth considering given as you say this is likely to be a long-term thing? firefly ( t · c ) 16:34, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done @Firefly: good idea. -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:37, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ad Orientem Thanks! firefly ( t · c ) 16:38, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IPs and new users. Johnj1995 (talk) 16:58, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring over an MOS:ETHNICITY issue, including some very experienced editors... RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 00:45, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:40, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Y'all making me dizzy. Please reapply if you still want FP. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:40, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Where do I submit my application? And will there be sandwiches? El_C 13:06, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@El C: Tacos! --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:21, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
In Tacos! --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:23, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
👍 Like. But will there be a singing? El_C 13:52, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Jimmie Rodgers (memo to self-- more white out) --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:42, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 18:44, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs of different /64-ranges changing the name of the article subject. – NJD-DE (talk) 16:56, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and removal of sourced information by even some account users. Includes attempts to move this page to "Koli Darbar" and attempts to remove references to non-Koli groups that were referred to as Darbars according to sources provided. This has persisted even though a user previously reverted the page move and asked for discussion to be had before such a move was made. TSAray (talk) 17:23, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Tbhotch. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:41, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There is a content dispute going on and only locking editing on this page will bring the parties to actually discuses the changes (ideally the state of the page before the dispute should be returned to before protecting the page). Gonnym (talk) 18:34, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 19:24, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary Semi Protection :' Persistent disruptive editing Adam Bernstein (talk) 18:58, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Firefly. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:03, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Change protection template from Full Protection - which the page is not protected as, to template protection as it looks slightly confusing and nearly made me think it was full protected when it isn't 19:35, 31 March 2022 (UTC)Zippybonzo | talk

The same should apply for Module:ListZippybonzo | talk 19:36, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, so I've looked into this and firstly, I think this is a request to decrease protection, not make an edit. Second, the template and module are cascade protected which is why they are listed as full protected. The issue Zippybonzo points out is that these modules and templates are tempalte protected in addition to the cascaded full protection. @Primefac: you protected the module, so thought it would be worth asking you: is it worth upping these template protections to full protections in order to match the cascade protection level or should I just leave it alone? Wug·a·po·des 21:40, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The module is transcluded on over 2 million pages, so it absolutely must be full-protected; even if it weren't cascade-protected from being transcluded on the Main Page, it would be under fprot, which I will now do.
That being said, to answer your last question - if something gets cascade-protected normally, I do not think we need to match that protection unless it's something that will permanently be cascade-protected (like this module), because in all likelihood the cascade protection will eventually be removed. (please ping on reply) Primefac (talk) 09:08, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac: thanks for the second opinion. I've also upped protection on Template:if empty and Module:List for the same reasons. I'll mark this as resolved for the bot. Wug·a·po·des 21:02, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Wug·a·po·des 21:02, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected indefinitely. Wug·a·po·des 21:02, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. dizzyflamingo (talk) 18:29, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:53, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:53, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated addition of unsourced content and removal of sourced content by fly-by-night editors. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 18:30, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Looks like it's been resolved (I think). El_C 19:26, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: WP:ARBEE. ― Tartan357 Talk 21:05, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. firefly ( t · c ) 21:19, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

04 April 2022

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing/edit warring by IP user. BilCat (talk) 17:27, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 22:46, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Per ongoing 2022 Pakistani constitutional crisis between Government and Opposition parties, Parliament is dissolved by the government, and matter goes in Supreme Court of Pakistan so kindly increase Page protection until clear status. Also see: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Pakistan crisis 103.141.159.74 (talk) 19:50, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Same as Parliament of Pakistan and National Assembly of Pakistan — Maile (talk) 22:59, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism. Nswix (talk) 21:47, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 22:49, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Larry Hockett (Talk) 22:22, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:42, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content to this biography of a recently deceased person. Since temporary protection was lifted on 1 April there have been six further instances of IP vandalism. Chocmilk03 (talk) 23:17, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:41, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because “We Continue The Change” is not a registered political party in Bulgaria and their funding isn’t available to the public. It has become clearer that this movement is funded by oligarchs with close ties to Vladimir Putin. 24.59.251.207 (talk) 21:37, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. —C.Fred (talk) 21:41, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Réunion (talk to me) 01:07, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~TNT (talk • she/her) 01:22, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 03:52, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 04:28, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article should be protected, yes, but not with that only administrators can edit protection, the user who made the protection certainly do not cares who Rhodes is, the article must be updated since the return of this wrestler last night at WrestleMania 38. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 20:56, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @TheBellaTwins1445: If the article needs to be updated, you can start discussion at the article talk page and build consensus there, then request an edit via the {{subst:EP}} template. —C.Fred (talk) 21:46, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N.B. I have responded to multiple edit requests on the talk page and added a short sentence about his return to WWE. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:51, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N.B.#2 The protecting administrator has reduced protection to semi-protection. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:46, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Contentious trans celebrity's talk page is being used by IPs as a forum. Requesting protection for a year hoping her celebrity fades a bit, based on past protection that recently expired. A. C. SantacruzPlease ping me! 21:53, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only one really problematic edit recently. We try not to protect talk pages unless they are really under attack, especially when the main article is already protected. MelanieN (talk) 02:47, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There is currently an ongoing content dispute between users Herzog von Teschen and FromCzech. Requesting a revert to the last stable version Special:Diff/1079741867 and a full page protection for at least a couple days. Thank you. - Darwinek (talk) 23:35, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Very slow motion disagreement. Try to get the disputants to discuss at the talk page.  MelanieN (talk) 02:50, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism by IP. dizzyflamingo (talk) 03:57, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 04:52, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 05:20, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 05:45, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. dizzyflamingo (talk) 05:28, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 05:34, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continuous WP:BLP violations by multiple accounts that carry out the exact same edits (most likely sock/meat puppets) eg- 1 vs 2 UtoD 05:42, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 05:45, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Until consensus is reached on the wording in the lede. Keep revision at 1080876116. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:49, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. See my comment at the talk page. MelanieN (talk) 03:09, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Frequent unsourced changes by IPs/new users continue since the previous protection has expired. Ab207 (talk) 06:22, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 06:33, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 07:56, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reasonably low edit rate from IPs/new users, so Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 08:16, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: idk why but seems like there is like a little problem on this article by IP users that is editing at the original network section. Please pending changes protect this article, theres something wrong on the IPs edits that needs review 120.29.76.21 (talk) 06:14, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

regarding this on what I am talking about, is that they are adding networks that is not airing on it 120.29.76.21 (talk) 06:36, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 08:57, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Lots of low level unconstructive edits - mostly by the same IP editor - that are not contributing to the quality of the article. Short term semi-protection would hopefully see this editor get bored and move on. 10mmsocket (talk) 06:39, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:01, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Please revert the file to my revision from 03:35, 3 April 2022, speedy delete the NYT and Reuters revisions per WP:GETTY and apply overwrite protection. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 08:01, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. For editing. Upload and move protected at admin level. Revert and/or tag for deletion as you see fit, I'm having a hard time figuring out what's what here (maybe It'll come to me with more coffee). El_C 09:06, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
El C, good call, I just found out the photo itself (the one by Brian Snyder from Reuters) has some independent coverage like [11] so WP:GETTY possibly won't apply in this case. Complicated case. Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 09:26, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Right, looks like there's fair use arguments, so I'm leaving those for EC users to resolve, at least for the time being. El_C 09:32, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DoebLoggs (talk) 09:18, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also reveldels involving defamatory material of an extremely egregious nature. El_C 09:36, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This was actually Taylor Hawkins' final appearance, and Mike Myers and Seth MacFarlane aren't even in this movie. It would make sense for this article to be semi-protected following that and Taylor Hawkins' death. 2601:204:203:5110:E4C7:7A0C:CC75:B0D9 (talk) 18:22, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:48, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: So far, onlt one disruptive user. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:48, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 14:52, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page has recently faced rampant vandalism from pro-Russian IP accounts attempting to delete information or otherwise insinuate that the Ukrainian Air Force has been destroyed, which is harmful misinformation. A quick scan of the 50 most recent edits (going back to 25/3) shows that most of them have been IP vandalism or reversions thereof. Toadspike (talk) 00:18, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot to specify that I am requesting indefinite semi-protection, to be reviewed once current events make it no longer necessary (not in the foreseeable future). Toadspike (talk) 00:19, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:36, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: WP:ARBEE --Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:36, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 14:52, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring and pov-pushing by an IP user (addition of unsourced content and misrepresented sources). Mann Mann (talk) 01:46, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user is lying about what is transpiring at Kingdom of Khotan. If one visits the page, one can see that the newly added information is not only sourced and cited, but that there are around 16 citations from primary academic sources that corroborate the claim made. In addition, the claims of edit warring are unfactual and more applicable to the user HISTORYOFIRAN that reverted more than three good faith, sourced edits in less than 24 hours without proper rationale or reason. In addition, there are no misrepresented sources or unsourced content provided in edits made. I request the administrators and editors to visit the page, view the Talk page and see for themselves. This user also asked me to provide my sources and rationale on the Talk page of the article, and failed to respond to my concerns when I provided burden of proof. This user is simply assisting the other user in pushing a false narrative without any evidence. 69.143.174.241 (talk) 04:43, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nonsense and personal attack. Did you wait for the other involved editors? No. The IP user didn't wait for other involved editors @HistoryofIran and Hzh: and just restored his/her edits.[12] Timestamps are crystal clear. To admins: please take a look at Kingdom of Khotan: Revision history and IP user's edits and behavior on the other articles. See how many of them were reverted by other editors; e.g. [13][14][15][16]. I opened a section on Talk:Kingdom of Khotan to stop edit warring. The IP user already violated 3RR and other WP rules. He/She clearly does not know how to use talk pages. I requested page protection because he/she just ignores other users' edit summaries and reverts their edits. He/She even never heard of patrolling and he/she thinks just because me and other users reverted his/her edits, then there must be a conspiracy against him/her. I don't edit Kingdom of Khotan so why do you expect me to participate there?! It is for you and the other editors. I just tried to convince you to stop edit warring and solve the issues via talk page, which you just ignored. Anyway, I don't edit Kingdom of Khotan and other articles edited by this IP user so I don't involve myself in this discussion anymore. Mann Mann (talk) 05:44, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Complete nonsense. You accused me of using unsourced content and misrepresented sources and when confronted with the facts, you are now trying to change the narrative and bring in examples of "reverted" content in an attempt to damage my credibility. You are wrong again my friend, for one the changes made to the articles in question were restorations of older, legitimate content that had been deleted en masse by random trolls and users without explanation, even though the content they contained was perfectly legitimate, accurate and correctly cited. I didnt even write the original content of these articles, I just reverted them to their original state before they were vandalized. You can check and compare them for yourself. The Racial classification Article has been reverted dozens of times by dozens of many established editors ever since the user AmericanHistorian went on a rampage to try to completely change the article and fill it with false statements without citations. The South Asian article was a restoration of a previous version that contained exhaustive sources and facts, because it was recently vandalized and a lot of information regarding Afghanistan was deleted. Finally, the Sayyid brothers article was edited and large parts of its content was removed by a banned user, which I simply restored with additional sources, only to have it reverted by another user without explanation. I reviewed the article again and it contains perfectly sourced content and numerous sources that support its claims so its removal was illegitimate and amounts to vandalism. Besides, people often have their edits reverted regardless of how legitimate and correct their edits are. it says nothing about the credibility of the person. You on the other hand, are simply lying about the nature of my edits and misrepresenting my intentions. 69.143.174.241 (talk) 06:28, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your edits are disruptive and unsourced[17][18][19][20]. Even your last edit[21] is disruptive. You added an unreliable source iran chamber and there is zero mention of South Asian. Seems all of your citations are just like that and that's the why I call your edits disruptive, misrepresentation of sources, and falsification (the very same reason HistoryofIran and Hzh mentioned in their edit summaries). You just refused to use talk page and started edit warring which was the reason why I requested page protection. Your case is beyond this specific board. Other editors may take it to WP:ANI or WP:AN/3RR. End of discussion. Mann Mann (talk) 07:16, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Absolute Rubbish. More lies and misrepresentation. None of the edits you linked to are disruptive or unsourced or inaccurate. Absolutely none. I have also added 16 sources to the statement I added -- SIXTEEN -- and yet you are trying to find weaknesses in one source that is supposedly "unreliable" when the page, hosted on a reputable website, clearly states that it is an exact quote/extract from an article published in a scholarly journal by a reputed historian. Every one of the other fifteen sources clearly shows how Indian/South Asian kingdoms, people, religion, culture and influence were present in Khotan from its inception. You are clearly trolling and abusing your privileges at WP. I also find it hilarious that you are talking about how there is supposedly "zero" mention of South Asian in my sources, when the sources clearly outline that Khotan is a part of South Asian and Indian history and clearly mention its crucial inclusion as a part of South Asian kingdoms and culture. The sources literally have the name "South Asian" in many of them. Do you know even know what South Asia means? Whats even more ironic is that there is zero, nada, zilch mention of how Khotan is an "Iranian" kingdom, a claim that the article peddles without ANY sources or citations to back it up. ZERO. And yet you NEVER bring up this fact, perhaps to satisfy the other users whose agenda you seek to peddle. Shameful. 69.143.174.241 (talk) 07:34, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. IP p-blocked for one week for violating WP:3RR. El_C 08:54, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection / Reason: Controversial topic. Recent page history is a mess of newly registered users edit warring, and repeated removals of a massive chunk of sourced content. Homeostasis07 (talk/contributions) 11:52, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:46, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: After significant vandalism between 2010 and 2013, interest in this article has been neglible, with only 4 gnome edits each year in 2020 and 2021 and 1 constructive edit in 2022. Protection does not seem to be needed anymore. (Admin who applied the protection is inactive.). Schazjmd (talk) 15:37, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:59, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Good call. One constructive IP edit that I saw in years --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:59, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 14:52, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Leschnei (talk) 13:20, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Deepfriedokra. Ks0stm (TCGE) 14:06, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High Level of Vandalism VVikingTalkEdits 14:04, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 14:06, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary, I'm not even sure why it was added to begin with — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nswix (talkcontribs) 21:40, 3 Apr 2022 (UTC)

Isn’t there a log?--CreecregofLife (talk) 22:56, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There is indeed, and it indicates that it was semi-protected as a redirect to prevent repeated recreations. Obviously, it no longer exists as one. @Sandstein: I'm inclined to unprotect, given that things have changed since then. Thoughts? Sdrqaz (talk) 00:58, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the ping. I've speedily deleted the page per WP:G4, as it was previously deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFC 27 and the reasons for the deletion do not seem to have been addressed. Sandstein 10:58, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done For the bot; this has been processed. Lectonar (talk) 14:39, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 09:43, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:43, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:43, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IPs from a range edit warring to remove the same content without any explanation after more than 10 reverts. - SUN EYE 1 12:17, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 16:12, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Victor Trevor (talk) 15:58, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 16:06, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WMF-banned abuser WP:LTA/GRP vandalising the page using proxies. JavaHurricane 16:00, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 16:04, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from 2604:CB00:C00:FC00:4079:7329:2683:AA5D, adding unsourced episodes and usually reverting his edits. Edits have since been reverted. BrickMaster02 (talk) 13:12, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ks0stm (TCGE) 14:07, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Per WP:3RR LucasKannou (talk) 14:19, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 16:55, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism and high risk for more fake news. Just dealt with an IP editor claim a trailer was released two days ago with a June release and Pokémon reveal. There’s no doubt more will come CreecregofLife (talk) 16:37, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator MelanieN. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:04, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It wasn't when I wrote the report, but I do appreciate that the request was responded to so quickly, so thank you CreecregofLife (talk) 17:08, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent vandalism; the page history is nothing but a series of reverts at this point. Lkb335 (talk) 16:56, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:07, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Pending changes isn't helping stop disruption. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 16:59, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 17:02, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent and disruptive IP vandalism. KidAdSPEAK 17:00, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:10, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SWinxy (talk) 17:13, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 17:45, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent continuing vandalism today from multiple IPs. Singularity42 (talk) 17:13, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:19, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. IceWelder [] 17:38, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I don't see any attempt to discuss this on the talk page. Please take it there. MelanieN (talk) 17:49, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sebaspikyaq (talk) 17:47, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:52, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Many exaggerated information has been given out. It does not match with the real history. Vmshera (talk) 01:30, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Aurangzeb: You should request an edit via the talk page, then. —C.Fred (talk) 01:43, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Vmshera: see the above. I might be wrong but it seems C confused the page name for the username? CreecregofLife (talk) 05:27, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Please use edit requests. Lectonar (talk) 14:50, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Not being vandalised, my amend at other page was reverted because apparently broke transcluded table Indagate (talk) 13:25, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The “not being vandalized” is probably due to the protection CreecregofLife (talk) 13:47, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Extended confirmed protection is more than sufficient for this given the history of protection and disruption. And as CreecregofLife it's "not being vandalized" because of the protection. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 14:40, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Lectonar (talk) 14:48, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:GWAR edit warring ili (talk) 14:16, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:13, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 15:32, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The last edit was in February and the one before that a year before. Bbb23 (talk) 16:15, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP Vandalism, Partisan removal of sourced information, edit wars. TruthBuster21223 (talk) 15:54, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined It certainly appears that you are edit warring in the article in questions. I would stop that if I were you. Jayron32 16:20, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – By IP and newly created user [possibly the same person] [22], [23], [24], [25], [26] [27]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:11, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:14, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, especially on "Hanke's 2020 Misery Index" section. 7szz (talk) 18:12, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • There is no high level of vandalism on this page; the last two reverts of any edit have been on 2022-04-04 and 2021-12-21, which is a frequency of two potential vandalism edits in over 3 months. Pending-changes protection exists, but pending-changes protection of table-/data-heavy pages is a pain for volunteer reviewers whose main task is to revert plain and obvious vandalism and accept non-vandalism.
Declined ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:57, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism. wizzito | say hello! 20:35, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:40, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent hotbed for disruption and LTA activity. wizzito | say hello! 20:38, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:42, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring between two users. Areaseven (talk) 15:55, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Ks0stm (TCGE) 16:08, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I got really tripped up by this comment, I kept looking for a topic regarding this issue, under the interpretation “Consider what went on here when it was reported to the edit warring noticeboard for a an even clearer picture”. It wasn’t until I came back when I realized you were directing them to it CreecregofLife (talk) 19:11, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of an LTA who has most recently gamed AC to edit this article; see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Dusty8686 for more info. wizzito | say hello! 19:46, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:54, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Tow (talk) 22:13, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:59, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of an LTA; see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Dusty8686/Archive for more info. wizzito | say hello! 22:25, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mostly because it's semi-protection and won't hurt much.
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:56, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

05 April 2022

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. M.Bitton (talk) 21:33, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:00, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and disruptive editing. Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 22:16, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It should settle down a lot after today. Katietalk 23:17, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – See the page history. BasketballfanLIT (talk) 22:50, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 23:19, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. It resumed again shortly after the previous protection was lifted. Hey man im josh (talk) 23:36, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of five days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 02:27, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High IP vandalism. DL6443 (Talk/Contribs) 23:56, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 00:09, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent promotional hijacking by IPs. Even Fandom requires editors to log in, why don't we? Sumanuil. 02:24, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 02:30, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 02:30, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: See detailed un-protect request at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Gettr#Remove_%22targeted_to_American_conservative%22 98.109.117.71 (talk) 03:34, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I could go either way. @ScottyWong: you protected the page, any thoughts on this request? Wug·a·po·des 20:59, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Scottywong: (for Wugs). Sdrqaz (talk) 00:58, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined This article was protected 3 times prior to me protecting it. Each time the protection expired, vandals returned almost immediately. I have no reason to believe that that won't happen again if we unprotect. An article on this type of subject is probably more likely to get indef semi-protected than unprotected. My vote is to keep it protected, but I'm fine if anyone disagrees and wants to test the waters. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 21:33, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Binksternet (talk) 03:39, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator EvergreenFir. bibliomaniac15 05:48, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent disruption across many IPs. Binksternet (talk) 03:40, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected bibliomaniac15 05:49, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Cf. recent activity at Richard Lynn, which also needed protection today. Same IPs involved here. Generalrelative (talk) 05:52, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. bibliomaniac15 05:58, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. InfiniteNexus (talk) 02:48, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Not enough activity, and in general talk pages should only be protected as a last resort. bibliomaniac15 05:47, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Kpddg (talk contribs) 03:53, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. bibliomaniac15 05:53, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sockpuppetry continued after protection. wizzito | say hello! 04:43, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. bibliomaniac15 05:54, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent WP:NOTFORUM and spam problem. wizzito | say hello! 05:09, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – User talk pages are not protected except in response to severe or continued vandalism. bibliomaniac15 05:56, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Socks of Glam-girlz attacking again. Jalen Folf (talk) 04:37, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If you want longer or shorter, just ping me please. Lectonar (talk) 09:55, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. TolWol56 (talk) 04:40, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:56, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Socks of Glam-girlz targeting this user. Jalen Folf (talk) 04:40, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm unsure of how effective that this would be, since they'll just find other ways to troll me anyway. In addition, I would rather that this be used as an absolute last resort, since I would like to be able to communicate with unregistered and new users due to the work I do on RC patrol and AfC. I personally am not too worried, but feel free to protect it if it really is necessary. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 06:15, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined If the intended target is fine with no protection, so it is. Lectonar (talk) 08:20, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: This is an alternative spelling (apparently) of composer Hesham Nazeh's name. An article has been created at Hesham Nazeh for them and this article naming should be created and redirect there. Favre1fan93 (talk) 14:37, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And if protection really need be, it can be reinstituted after the redirect is created CreecregofLife (talk) 14:42, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
courtesy ping @TomStar81: last protecting admin. Lectonar (talk) 14:47, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
After review, the ruling on the field is for unprotection. Based on the current version and the last two previously deleted version, there is too much difference to justify G4 deletion, therefore the article should be moved to the new name as this article and the previous versions of the differently named article are for the same person. I'm dropping the protection level and will move it over, but it should be noted that the article has been nominated for deletion previously on the talk page for fair disclosure. TomStar81 (Talk) 12:36, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: I am hoping to move Mophead: How Your Difference Makes a Difference to this title, but it is create-protected due to past disruption. Graham (talk) 05:02, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Graham11: Unprotected; see 129785542. Sdrqaz (talk) 13:29, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2400:AC40:A3A:22F0:0:0:0:1 (talk) 08:58, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Page not specified. Lectonar (talk) 10:22, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism and adding misinformation without valid source by proxies. Needs to be protected at least for 6 months at the level of admins and extended confirmed users. Please make sure check last edits are correct before protection. Thanks. Gharouni Talk 06:13, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 13:50, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. iAdnan (talk) 07:44, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:20, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Wretchskull (talk) 08:39, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:27, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The user Toixo has attributed nacional socialist ideology to a Catalan pro-independece party with no references and no correlation to any other language version of this page. Ayla Cat (talk) 09:48, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:28, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Socks of Glam-girlz targeting this user. Jalen Folf (talk) 04:41, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:02, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Socks of Glam-girlz targeting this user. Jalen Folf (talk) 04:42, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:02, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: persistent unblock request spamming by IPs. Lavalizard101 (talk) 10:54, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:02, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Frederick Douglass Intro 2nd paragraph

" My Bondage and My Freedom (1855). Following the Civil War, Douglass was AN active campaigner for the rights of freed slaves and wrote his last autobiography " Ktoeda (talk) 14:58, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done -- Favonian (talk) 15:06, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent problem of IPs adding unsourced content, etc. wizzito | say hello! 05:04, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:47, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: editor with an apparent COI and changing IP is trying to remove sourced criticism from the article Axem Titanium (talk) 09:10, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:54, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recurring issues with ethnonationalist POV pushing. Iskandar323 (talk) 10:38, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 13:55, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Wretchskull (alt) (talk) 10:59, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 13:41, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandals attacking again. Pavlov2 (talk) 11:11, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 13:41, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Talk page protection. This has been subject to a number of editors outright denying/downplaying the massacre or alleged war crimes took place, a clear violation of WP:NOTHERE, or promoting a WP:FALSEBALANCE between Russian actions and Ukraine by IP editors and new accounts. Issue has been raised on the talk page itself, even though the article does not seem to suffer from the same disruptive efforts. QueenofBithynia (talk) 12:59, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article doesn't get disrupted because it is already protected. As for the talk-page: we have a higher disruption threshold before we protect an article talk-page; this threshold hasn't been reached imho so I wouldn't protect (yet). Decision deferred. Lectonar (talk) 13:40, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined for now ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:03, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 16:07, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:59, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. dizzyflamingo (talk) 16:14, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:02, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

06 April 2022

Reason: Very rapid unsourced edits by 8 different IPs and 2 different users. 2804:F14:C060:8A01:3DBA:71D8:8B0B:E34B (talk) 00:58, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit spree seems to have slowed down. (supposedly it was caused by something that happened very recently in WWE) 2804:F14:C060:8A01:3DBA:71D8:8B0B:E34B (talk) 01:07, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to pause this request and to fully rescind it if there is no additional wave of edits in the next hour. It wasn't malicious anyways, the name change(for his character) DID happen, it just so happens that when the edit wave happened it was just revealed and there was no information readily accessible. Thank you for you time. 2804:F14:C060:8A01:3DBA:71D8:8B0B:E34B (talk) 01:28, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Page is now semi-protected for 1 month (?) until 02:52, 5 May 2022 (UTC) (by C.Fred (talk)). Thanks! 2804:F14:C060:8A01:3DBA:71D8:8B0B:E34B (talk) 03:02, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator C.Fred. bibliomaniac15 05:59, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:19, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism over many weeks. Greenman (talk) 19:21, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection was asked by users removing sourced info to push their POV, see Talk page on this article. 2A01:115F:7E7:D600:61BE:6A10:6CDF:D5B4 (talk) 00:52, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The page was protected for disruptive editing. Bring your sorrows up on the article talk-page. Lectonar (talk) 14:23, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is nonsense, the only "disruptive editing" was perforemd by vandals removing sourced info. 2A01:115F:7E7:D600:CD74:41F6:17F5:D089 (talk) 19:58, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
IPv6, are you SURE you want to fight on this particular hill? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 20:55, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think this might be a case of NOTHERE CreecregofLife (talk) 21:11, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Routine disruption by IP hoppers and random throw-away accounts. Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 07:28, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have raised the issue in the article talk Background section and other sections are clearly sourced.There is no vandalism but Censorship.183.82.108.172 (talk) 07:39, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Last time, Ad Orientem had said there is not enough disruption when I had asked for protection, but now the time has come to impose ECP just like other hoax-prone article Breast tax. Also notify El C. Wareon (talk) 08:39, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It is sourced with BBC and The Hindu and WP:RS sources easily over 30 do not treat it as a hoax or fictional.This is a content issue. Wareon has been reverting sourced content.183.82.108.172 (talk) 08:53, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This is a content dispute involving ECP users, so the only remedy is fully protect amd encourage dispute resolution --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:53, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Deepfriedokra: Not a content dispute but failure to drop stick by the lone IP editor who edited no other subject for months (WP:SPA). If you know editors like Winged Blades of Godric and Sitush, they also concluded that this subject is fictional per this discussion. Now this IP comes out of nowhere to reject it all and edit war. That's why the page needs ECP protection so that only ECP users can edit. Wareon (talk) 16:17, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It is a content dispute that needs to be resolved in talk.Hence ECP is inappropriate in a content dispute which is being discussed in talk.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:25, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, User:Pharaoh of the Wizards. Just came to check on this. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:02, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:05, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Similar vandalism edits by IPs from all over the place. Edits include changing his name to "Quesadilla", which is incorrect. lol1VNIO (talkcontribs) 18:55, 5 April 2022 (UTC); Edited 18:58, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 04:20, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting semi-protection to try and stop a persistent edit-warrer with a shifting IP address from continuing to change information without source; this page was fully protected briefly once before to combat this user but evidently it has been fruitless. Lllogan (talk) 21:01, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Ks0stm (TCGE) 04:30, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of an LTA; see Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Bucharest Wild Kratts and horror film vandal for more info. wizzito | say hello! 22:18, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 04:22, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of an LTA; see Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Bucharest Wild Kratts and horror film vandal for more info. wizzito | say hello! 22:18, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 04:25, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of an LTA; see Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Bucharest Wild Kratts and horror film vandal for more info. wizzito | say hello! 22:19, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 04:29, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLPvio by an IP hopping vandal. Blake Gripling (talk) 22:19, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 04:35, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of an LTA; see Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Bucharest Wild Kratts and horror film vandal for more info. wizzito | say hello! 22:19, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 04:44, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of an LTA; see Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Bucharest Wild Kratts and horror film vandal for more info. wizzito | say hello! 22:20, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 04:44, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of an LTA; see Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Bucharest Wild Kratts and horror film vandal for more info. wizzito | say hello! 22:20, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 04:44, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism. wizzito | say hello! 22:32, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 04:46, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism problem. wizzito | say hello! 23:24, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 06:01, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several IPs and one non-confirmed account have vandalised this article in the past few days. TornadoLGS (talk) 23:38, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 06:05, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism continues right off of protection. wizzito | say hello! 23:42, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 06:08, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued addition of extensive plot against guideline notes by various anonymous editors; see previous protection log for protections for the same issue. -- Alex_21 TALK 00:15, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 06:12, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated IP vandalism, repeated BLP violations, edit warring by IP addresses - Naushervan (talk) 04:40, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 06:19, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Aggressive push by an anonymous editor to have their version of an article published, despite it being contrary to Wikipedia guidelines (particularly WP:OFFICIAL and WP:COMMONNAME). Refusal to engage on the talk or consider comments in the edit summary, references to non-existent policies and avoiding discussions/confrontations by hopping across anonymous VPN IP addresses. CentreLeftRight 22:36, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@CentreLeftRight: {{Declined}} – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Based on what you had said, I thought there was perhaps a discussion you had started on the talk page that the IP user had not touched. I thought that maybe they were hijacking the page to "have their version of an article published". I was wrong on both counts. I won't be surprised if an administrator decides to block you both for edit-warring. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:06, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If going by the book is a content dispute and reverting edits contrary to Wikipedia guidelines is the start of what would be considered an edit war, then I will leave it as it is. I have no interest in being accused of the latter over a relatively small disruptive edit spree from an anonymous user. CentreLeftRight 00:25, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
CentreLeftRight, I'm going to disable my declination template to allow another administrator to weigh in. Maybe I was too harsh and I'm sorry. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:39, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Sdrqaz: No worries, I can see where you are coming from having reviewed my request and reverts to that article. I should have been more clear that this particular change has been pushed on the article before, and it has been frustrating, presenting anonymous editors with known guidelines but then being ignored and dealing with a new IP. I apologise too if I came off aggressive. All the best, CentreLeftRight 02:54, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The disruption is not terribly heavy, so semi-protection would be overkill. But we have a recurring problem. Pending changes protection should be fine here, as it won't allow the edits to go "live". I have watchlisted too. Lectonar (talk) 07:13, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Hubert Davis is in his first season as the coach of UNC's men's basketball team. His team has also had a deep postseason run. There has been increased editing to this page as a result of his team's season, several of which are non-encyclopedic and juvenile (i.e. taking shots at Mike Krzyzewski). Mungo Kitsch (talk) 23:30, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:15, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Protection expired yesterday. IP vandal has returned. Robby.is.on (talk) 08:45, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:56, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Article was previously protected but shortly after. the protection was lifted there were unsourced edits and a vandalism edit by an IP user. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:24, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 13:04, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DoebLoggs (talk) 12:54, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 13:05, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Could an administrator remove the temporary protection from the D. C. Douglas article in order to eliminate the term actor (something for example[28]) which covers his work as a theater, film, television and voice actor because it is his occupation, also I understand that someone protected the page definitively without giving the clear reason that IPs or obsessive users have violated the biographies policy of living people and yet nothing changed. 148.101.45.58 (talk) 01:00, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But he’s an actor and voice actor. Are you trying to pretend he’s not either? CreecregofLife (talk) 01:12, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No, it's not that, it's that I thought that by asking for the decrease of the article I was going to separate the two different professions from the actor to be able to cover all his work attached to the filmography of others, including this one and Mark Hamill for example, because not all the users here say that they can apply the opening sentences to articles related to American actors. (see here) 148.101.45.58 (talk) 01:40, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm still confused for what you're asking for, and why you need the protection of an article about a harassment target decreased when an edit request on the talkpage would've sufficed CreecregofLife (talk) 01:52, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Please use an edit request, as mentioned. Lectonar (talk) 08:05, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – In the past week alone there have been no less than three attempts to push different ethnic slants in this article, respectively trying to make Avicenna Tajik, Uzbek and Turkish. Basic page protection is urgently needed. Iskandar323 (talk) 09:07, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:40, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:40, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Current protection was for move, whereas I am asking about edit. Fade258 (talk) 13:30, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected I set the edit protection to match the expiry of move protection. Ks0stm (TCGE) 15:16, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semu protection due to high level of sockpuppetry editing at the infobox. Beshogur (talk) 13:50, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 15:18, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:20, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Skjoldbro (talk) 15:10, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 15:24, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 15:13, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 15:26, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 15:26, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Folf (talk) 16:09, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is a high amount of vandalism on this page, presumably in response to a recent announcement about the politician. Please protect this page ASAP. Jalen Folf (talk) 16:37, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:48, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: several IP mass edit warring with many manual of style issues and copoyrght concerns like copy/pasting stuff from websites directly to the article, refusing to discuss at talk Snowflake91 (talk) 11:02, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not so fast. Check out the revision history on top of User:Snowflake91's talk page. He is a troll who blocks literally any edition whether backed by one or multiple reliable sources. No explanations in the edit summaries besides the old triggerhappy undo message. He is literally a menace for many new and veteran editors who try to contribute to article involving football. Not the first of him getting blocked and warned either. 2A0D:6FC0:1903:7100:E428:9058:3791:BE6E (talk) 11:10, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also see this: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Snowflake91 reported by User talk:2A0D:6FC0:1903:7100:E428:9058:3791:BE6E (Result: ) 2A0D:6FC0:1903:7100:E428:9058:3791:BE6E (talk) 11:28, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 14:56, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: It seems there's been a return of activity from editor(s) adding non-notable, unsourced awards again, which has been a perennial issue before once page protection was removed/expired. Requesting protection of the page. Itssheenabautista (talk) 12:42, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. For about 2 weeks or more this has always been the same user. Last protection ended more than 1 year ago. Lectonar (talk) 14:59, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Almost all recent edits consist of vandalism or reversions thereof. Please semi-protect so that editors can fix the damage. Toadspike (talk) 16:56, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:02, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 14:00, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ks0stm (TCGE) 15:19, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: An IP editor is repeatedly adding a claim that is not supported by any reference, which two experienced editors have reverted. The IP has refused to engage in discussion on the talk page or their user talk page, and is continuing to edit war. Please semi-protect the page. Modest Genius talk 15:28, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. partial block as solitary IP makes SP undesirable. Resubmit if they change IP's --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:41, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent MOS:DERRY violations, despite the page's edit notice. FDW777 (talk) 16:00, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:45, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent (today's IP of 2A02:C7E:3278:BB00:C8DD:43B6:995A:950E (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) is clearly the same editor as 2A02:C7F:8677:AA00:E1D0:C9BC:C43D:F556 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) from February 2019, as well as many others in the article's history) attempts to add "Decisive" to the infobox despite it being against the instructions at Template:Infobox military conflict. FDW777 (talk) 16:05, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:46, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A simmering edit wear between multiple users of issues of ethnicity, that is making it keep the page straight. Slatersteven (talk) 17:07, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:39, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Vandalism has returned from multiple new accounts. FozzieHey (talk) 17:55, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator zzuuzz. Favonian (talk) 18:34, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Due to the 2022 Pakistani constitutional crisis, the article and several others face persistent vandalism. Jibran1998 (talk) 18:30, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:53, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting indefinite full protection as my former user page and user talk page, extremely likely targets for vandalism, and there will be no need to edit said redirects. — csc-1 11:51, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected indefinitely. Seems like a reasonable request. MelanieN (talk) 22:21, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism by IP Please see that this IP-range was blocked before for such vandalism. See this as well as [29] [30] [31]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:51, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism continues [32] [33]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:00, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
More vandalism [34] [35]. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:01, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:03, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. Repeated BLP violations and POV-pushing. Possibly just person socking, but I can't confirm that. Sunmist (talk) 17:14, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator C.Fred. Favonian (talk) 20:50, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There's been a recent string of vandalism on this page with folks adding in potentially defamatory statements about family members. It may be best to temporarily protect until whatever's going on dies down. PureRED | talk to me | 17:32, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:48, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. partial block here and other family articles --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:48, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. FMSky (talk) 19:23, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:38, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring during an ongoing RfC. Firefangledfeathers (talk | contribs) 19:24, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:42, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

07 April 2022

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism from various IPs with range 183.171. .... ---CX Zoom(he/him) (let's talk|contribs) 18:30, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:55, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:55, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: Disruptive editing by anon IP despite warning. Shadowwarrior8 (talk) 19:22, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 22:25, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Six User:Cyberpunk2077JohnnySilverhand sockpuppets in as many days adding the same weird lie. Lord Belbury (talk) 19:36, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:59, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:59, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article is often target of IP vandalism, it was protected back in February but when the protection expired the vandalism returned. Pob3qu3 (talk) 19:40, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 01:14, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Longer term pending changes seems appropriate here. The article is edited infrequently but is vandalised sporadically. FozzieHey (talk) 20:39, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It's hard to justify indefinite ANYTHING when the last semi-protection was for a single week. If needed, please call on me. BusterD (talk) 01:18, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Dozens of IP addresses make incorrect edits and post incorrect information. This page needs work. Only users should be making edits on this page. ThePorgieBaggins98 (talk) 21:41, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Indefinite protection is only for articles which have tried it for shorter durations. Only one previous protection, and I'm not convinced semi-protection will weed out vandals, since almost all of the edits are from registered users. Keep me advised if this goes off the rails again. BusterD (talk) 01:34, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Trolling and disruption by non-ACs and IPs. Obviously falls under ARBCOM/EE, but more pragmatically this is a current news thing so that explains it. Plenty of soapboxing. Needs a break to this madness. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 22:50, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:36, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Immediate resumption of vandalism upon expiry of previous protection. Knuthove (talk) 00:57, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:32, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Immediate resumption of vandalism upon expiry of previous protection. Knuthove (talk) 00:59, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:32, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. dizzyflamingo (talk) 01:32, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 01:39, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism from IP editors. Most/all of this is related to the invasion of Ukraine, so this page will probably only need to be protected for a few months. Endwise (talk) 03:11, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:31, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Huge amount of unsourced back-and-forth changes by IPs over past few days. Jessicapierce (talk) 03:20, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:30, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Once again recurring vandalism of a page that has been a magnet for it for years. AndyTheGrump (talk) 03:25, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:29, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting temporary protection due to persistent unsourced edits and vandalism by IP users regarding his "marriage" to the Kardashian sister. Altair110 03:33, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:39, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing (just like last time). – Rhain 04:00, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 04:37, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: LTA activity, see WP:LTA/WKHF thx 2601:901:4300:1CF0:C938:885A:6D94:2D9E (talk) 04:03, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 04:39, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: LTA activity: see WP:LTA/WKHF thx 2601:901:4300:1CF0:C938:885A:6D94:2D9E (talk) 04:06, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 04:39, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: lta activity; see WP:LTA/WKHF thx 2601:901:4300:1CF0:C938:885A:6D94:2D9E (talk) 04:07, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 05:10, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant vandalism and attacks, edits in violation of WP:BLP UtoD 04:28, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 05:12, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism. wizzito | say hello! 04:56, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A bit low of an edit rate for semi, so Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Feel free to re-request if the edit rate becomes to much for pending changes to handle. Ks0stm (TCGE) 05:15, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. wizzito | say hello! 05:09, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 05:16, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – target of an LTA w/ highly dynamic IPs; see User:EvergreenFir/socks#31_Minutos_/_Nicktasmo_(Sao_Paulo, Brazil) thx. wizzito | say hello! 05:26, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 05:47, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – target of an LTA; see protection request of Don't Hug Me I'm Scared thx. wizzito | say hello! 05:28, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 05:48, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Tow (talk) 07:44, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:23, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated vandalism and disruptive editing by multiple IPs. (t · c) buidhe 08:12, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:21, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 08:43, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also Y. S. Jagan Mohan Reddy ministry (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) and Perni Venkataramaiah (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs), seems like a whack-a-mole here — DaxServer (t · m · c) 08:45, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently, this is socking Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/IamaneditorofwikiDaxServer (t · m · c) 08:55, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one month (all), after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:14, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent edit warring from IPs, despite a talk page discussion they do not contribute to. Started as soon as the previous protection expired. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:23, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:25, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 17:41, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:51, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:51, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I think this user is not finished. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:51, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Deepfriedokra erm... What does it mean [a blocked] user is not finished? —usernamekiran (talk) 05:22, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 15:30, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The majority of the activity on the page is IP addresses making silly edits, or vandalism or trying to insert political views about a former president. They are invariably from IP addresses or phones and this has been going on for months. If we semi-protected it indefinitely, this would solve it I think. CT55555 (talk) 21:21, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I can see your problem, but there's one questionable edit in the last two weeks. Never been protected before. No way can we indef anything under those circumstances. Please keep me advised if this needs to be re-protected at some point. BusterD (talk) 01:23, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Reprotected after some move shenanigans. Lectonar (talk) 14:27, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Vandalism has significantly increased from new accounts and IP addresses. FozzieHey (talk) 08:50, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The gift that keeps on giving, with top-notch comedy (though, if you have to point out that something is funny, it probably isn't). Anyway, see y'all in 2023. El_C 09:19, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks ;). I don't mind some pending changes but when 90% of edits now are adding these funny jokes it gets a bit old! FozzieHey (talk) 09:28, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well, now I have Smooth Operator stuck in my head. Good song. El_C 09:35, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Vanamonde (Talk) 13:10, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kpddg (talk) 13:56, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations. (CC) Tbhotch 15:45, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 15:48, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism since April 2021. Arubamadness (talk) 11:00, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Less Unless (talk) 14:24, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism. Arubamadness (talk) 11:54, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Less Unless (talk) 14:25, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Unsure why this needed an indefinite semi-protection, as most vandalism seems to be blanking which I'm sure we have a filter for, PC could work to make sure that unregistered users can present their ideas (or even unprotect altogether since Wikipedia:Main Page/sandbox is unprotected). Since it seems to not be watched often a bot could clean it every so often much like in the regular sandbox. 172.112.210.32 (talk) 02:23, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also I am aware that (as with many cases of semi-protection) creating an account is an option, but my personal preference is to edit from an IP. 172.112.210.32 (talk) 02:29, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Favonian: last protecting admin. Lectonar (talk) 09:03, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Lectonar: Can't really take credit for the edit protection, which was put in place by Seddon 12 days before I upped the move protection to EC. The latter should remain, but I'll let others with a more cuddly attitude to IPs decide on the former. Favonian (talk) 18:14, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Favonian: Sorry, I really must learn to read logs...Lectonar (talk) 14:08, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Prior to protecting, there was quite a bit of IP vandalism, some of which was simple blanking (which was clearly not prevented by any edit filter), some of which was not blanking. I don't pretend to fully understand the purpose of this page, it appears to be a place to park alternative versions of the main page. If so, I can't imagine a reason that IPs would need to edit this page. Are anonymous editors frequently involved in making design changes to the main page? Should they be? I'd say no. The protecting admin has been inactive for a few days, and not particularly active in general. My vote would be to decline this request, as there's a clear history of IP vandalism, and no real genuine need for IPs to edit this page. I understand that your preference is to edit from an IP, but please understand that your preference comes with many consequences, so you'll need to accept that there are many things you can't do on WP as an IP. Just out of my own morbid curiosity, is there a particular reason that you prefer to edit as an IP? For the life of me, I can't see a single advantage to it. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 19:30, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I concur with your assessment ScottyWong. I don't see benefits to enabling IP editting here and any that exist are outweighed by the burden the page has generated in the past for editors. Seddon talk 22:21, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It seems that the page was meant for design experiments as Template:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia:Main Page/sandbox appears to say to move attempted redesigning of experiments there as "there is a risk that unwelcome / unapproved changes to the Main Page might get copied across" according to the text on the editnotice.
As for the inquiry about me editing from an IP I did actually have an account once, ended up having real-life issues associated with having a Wikipedia account and decided to stop using it. I haven't bothered trying to switch back anyways since I would consider myself to be in some good standing (despite the warnings decorating my talk page saying otherwise). 172.112.210.32 (talk) 02:26, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined I will go ahead and decline this for now. While I see where IP172.xxx is coming from (and I sympathize with their arguments), in that case I think the disruption might be too much to handle, even when using pending-changes protection (depending on editing frequency, it might put an undue burden on recent changes patrollers or the pending-changes reviewers), and concur with the arguments of my esteemed colleagues above. As for the idea of an automatic cleaning, I guess this might be brought up at the village pump. We can always revisit the protection. Lectonar (talk) 14:18, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request for page protection decrease of List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because it would be better if more users could edit the page. By doing this new information will be added to the page faster so more people can learn. Edertor (talk) 08:35, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy ping @Berig: last protecting admin. I don't think the protection should be lowered, though. Lectonar (talk) 09:01, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
More people can learn what? CreecregofLife (talk) 13:52, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. And we can learn about this of course. Lectonar (talk) 14:10, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: University was deleted in sloppy way by IP (already fixed). The comment was antisemitic and the page itself is about a sensitive topic. A limitation to changes by confirmed users would be appropriate. BenjaminFeldman (talk) 10:35, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The IP edit in question was not antisemitic, it merely said that Messianic Judaism was not Judaism, and removed such a school from this list. As the Wikipedia article on this topic makes clear, many Jews, Christians, and others view Messianic Judaism to be a syncretic branch of Christianity. So unless one argues that mainstream scholarship on this is antisemitic, then this accusation is unfounded. QueenofBithynia (talk) 11:07, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 14:43, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs continuing to change to past tense after previous protection expired. Mellk (talk) 17:46, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:14, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Due to the high politicization of this, please extend protection at least until after the 2022 November elections. ThePorgieBaggins98 (talk) 21:47, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article is semi-protected until August so perhaps we can re-visit another semi-protection then. Courtesy ping to protecting administrator El C. -- LuK3 (Talk) 22:00, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined this is not a request to unprotect or decrease protection. — xaosflux Talk 14:37, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Tow (talk) 13:41, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection. See Gengiev (talk · contribs)'s edits. He claims pictures are unsourced, but they have on wikimedia. And also has misleading edits like "non-Turkic and Turkic Old Uyghurs" which is totally incorrect. There is no non-Turkic Uyghur, also "Old Uyghur" is not a name given to people, but a language. Beshogur (talk) 15:19, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Bbb23 (talk) 15:25, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Beshogur, You are misinterpreting my words, and thus making false statements. I think you lie because you want to justify the deletion of my new content. So we need a page protection against you rather. I already replied to your allegations: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gengiev. You didn't respond. This shows me you are lacking knowledge in the Old Uyghur subject. --Gengiev (talk) 15:29, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Jibran1998 (talk) 17:06, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:34, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism: [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43]. — Shibbolethink ( ) 17:12, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:33, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism of BLP UtoD 17:36, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:32, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Very high level of IP vandalism related to news that broke today. Anwegmann (talk) 18:11, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 18:43, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ― Tartan357 Talk 20:03, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent abusive vandalism. Atlantic306 (talk) 20:40, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

08 April 2022

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP editors. Constant314 (talk) 19:28, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warr again on this page. PAVLOV (talk) 20:18, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism and disruptive edits. Hey man im josh (talk) 22:53, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As soon as latest protection expired, vandalism resumed. Page has been protected numerous times this year, with many revdel'd edits. Request longer-duration of protection. Schazjmd (talk) 23:54, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Acroterion. BusterD (talk) 00:26, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP ignores the talk page,[44] keeps edit-warring, and tries to remove an Oxford University Press source in favor of a source that fails WP:VER. -. LouisAragon (talk) 00:05, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 176.221.214.11 (talk · contribs) blocked by BusterD. Blocked ip for 72 hours for edit warring. Please let me know if this becomes a repeat problem. BusterD (talk) 00:24, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Article with no sourcing repeatedly being restored by IP editor. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 05:15, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected Lectonar (talk) 08:40, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Kenzie Bennett (talk) 02:28, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. It’s not clear what edit you want to make. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:06, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent disruptive editing. wizzito | say hello! 02:19, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:49, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Veracious ^(•‿•)^ 02:54, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:53, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism problem. wizzito | say hello! 03:28, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:59, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. IPs keep changing it to say the "criminals" are "North Korean spies" which, based on what I'm seeing on the talk page, is incorrect ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:08, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:59, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. HurricaneEdgar 04:24, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:55, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Can administrators put this page into protection? Many IP users keep on editing this page. They were adding info without reliable sources. I hope you you can put this page in protection. Thank you High level of IP vandalism. Selenne (talk) 09:31, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:50, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Same BLP violations by the same IP range, hours after the protection expired. - SUN EYE 1 03:20, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:57, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:57, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page protection expired; page has continued to be subject to vandalism by non-autoconfirmed editors. dizzyflamingo (talk) 04:07, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:15, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:15, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Last protection has lapsed, vandalism has resumed. CMD (talk) 12:13, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator zzuuzz. Favonian (talk) 13:15, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page 2022 in Philippine television will expire on April 9, 2022 01:57. Kindly request semi-protection of the page for ANOTHER 1 MONTH to prevent vandalism, hoax and unsourced schedule of the page. If unlock the page they created their edited of unsourced and hoax their. Thanks. Rvreyes 11 (talk) 02:42, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 10:57, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Due to the recent news, political edits start to arise, and it is better to place a temporary protection. 98.37.249.3 (talk) 03:46, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 10:56, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 05:51, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 10:54, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Victor Trevor (talk) 09:08, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Probably no need to pc, either, because there does not seem to be much lag between respective revisions. El_C 10:53, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – The vast majority of the edits for this page over the past several months have been cases of vandalism related to Dwayne Johnson. There's no indication that this will change as long as Johnson is an active public figure. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 14:07, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:06, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:06, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There is no evidence of vandalism seen in the protection logs. 2001:8003:8013:6E00:A5D0:590D:DBA:34AF (talk) 11:59, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined No reason given, and that's not where you would find the evidence, anyway. Protection will end on April 12. Lectonar (talk) 12:13, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This talk page has been indefinitely semi-protected since 2015, but according to Wikipedia:Protection_policy#Article_talk_pages, talk pages "are semi-protected only for a limited duration in the most severe cases of vandalism", which doesn't seem to be the case here as the page hasn't been edited since 2019. 91.129.102.205 (talk) 14:09, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! 91.129.102.205 (talk) 14:30, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There has been a high level of IP vandalism in past few days where they change the primary visual identification for the article. It is getting annoying having to re-add it all the time. LOVI33 14:15, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:09, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mellk (talk) 14:54, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:13, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Some IP addresses edit the page so that unsourced. -St3095 (?) 15:36, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:27, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Please restore the stable version. Karim185.3 (talk) 15:41, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:29, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constantly disrupted by socks of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bule Cloud/Archive Snowflake91 (talk) 16:10, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:32, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – The Among Us vandalism is back. O.N.R. (talk) 16:17, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:34, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Increase in vandalism from new accounts and IP addresses. FozzieHey (talk) 13:17, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:46, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. BattleshipMan (talk) 13:24, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:37, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continued IP disruption that has being on-going since the 28th March. Kansas Bear (talk) 16:59, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:35, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The fixture is approaching (it will be played in 10th of april) and each time this is played there are tons of edit wars between IPs. I suggest a protection. AdigabrekTalk Circassia 14:11, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:36, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. BRDude70 (talk) 14:42, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:12, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:12, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Kazamzam (talk) 14:54, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:20, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Basically what'd you'd expect. Repeat of the nonsense from MH17 in 2014. IPs inserting dubious disinfo Volunteer Marek 20:14, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I will add this page to my watchlist permanently and respond to calls for further protection. BusterD (talk) 20:23, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Proxy block evasion. CMD (talk) 12:41, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:38, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Continued edit wars over the ethnicity of the actress following expiry of recent protection. BLP issue. – DarkGlow17:58, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Looks like IP disruption rather than content dispute. Wug·a·po·des 20:50, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Only 3 of the past 50 edits have been something other than either vandalism or reverting it. interstatefive  (talk) - just another roadgeek 19:38, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Wug·a·po·des 20:52, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of unsourced editing and vandalism. Iamritwikaryan (talk) 18:22, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined If your edits were reverted, please read the edit summary or talk to the editor who reverted them. Less Unless (talk) 18:59, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: More BLP violations. Skywatcher68 (talk) 18:48, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless (talk) 19:01, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism, etc. wizzito | say hello! 21:11, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 21:23, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

09 April 2022

Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. Curbon7 (talk) 21:37, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 01:14, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated IP vandalism over the past several weeks. VistaSunset (talk) 22:21, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:20, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Dynamic IP. Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:29, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Wug·a·po·des 23:01, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP vandalism recently. PAVLOV (talk) 22:39, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Presumably from socks — DaxServer (t · m · c) 23:28, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months (all), after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:25, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. wizzito | say hello! 23:35, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:27, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – DE right off unprotection. wizzito | say hello! 23:37, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive editing, vandalism, and persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:51, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:37, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Explained at Talk:Peru#Peru's National Flag. (CC) Tbhotch 01:26, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:39, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Victor Trevor (talk) 20:26, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 01:10, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of IP vandalism. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:49, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 01:16, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism and hoaxing. wizzito | say hello! 22:21, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 01:21, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A user MrOllie keeps vandalizing this page by repeatedly removing a section "Proof-theoretic versus model-theoretic formalizations of non-monotonic logics" that has been added about nine years ago, 02:34, 30 June 2013‎. The said removals have been labeled as vandalism yet user MrOllie keeps vandalizing the page. 172.88.197.74 (talk) 23:36, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This isn't "vandalism" on MrOllie's part, but rather, likely WP:PROMO on yours, IP. Whatever WP:SILENT consensus that addition might have enjoyed, it's now been contested. You may try using the article talk page (Talk:Non-monotonic logic) to establish expressed consensus for the addition, I suppose, though again, it seems awful promo'y. And because of that, I place the WP:ONUS on you. Thanks. El_C 01:40, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the protection.
The section "Proof-theoretic versus model-theoretic formalizations of non-monotonic logics" has been there for about eight (8) years. It has been valid, informative, and important part of the main article. Now, user MrOllie appears to claim, without a shred of proof, it is "WP:PROMO". It is an absurd claim, and if user MrOllie makes it then he has a burden to prove it.
Any presumption that it is "WP:PROMO" just because user MrOllie claims that it is lacks rational and policy basis. And an expectation that he can remove anything he doesn't like unless there is a consensus of the visitors opposed to the removal does not serve anyone's legitimate interest.
Would you, please, explain how did you determine it was a "WP:PROMO"? To make it easier, I include relevant quote from Wikipedia policy in this matter:
"Self-promotion. It can be tempting to write about yourself or projects in which you have a strong personal involvement. However, remember that the standards for encyclopedic articles apply to such pages just like any other. This includes the requirement to maintain a neutral point of view, which can be difficult when writing about yourself or about projects close to you. Creating overly abundant links and references to autobiographical sources, such as your résumé or curriculum vitae, is unacceptable. See Wikipedia:Autobiography, Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest."
172.88.197.74 (talk) 02:06, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Content discussion should go on the article's talk page, not here. —C.Fred (talk) 02:18, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's not content discussion. It's debunking a claim of "self-promotion". 172.88.197.74 (talk) 03:07, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by new sockmaster. 30 hours should be sufficient for now. BilCat (talk) 04:00, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:22, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page has consistently been vandalized because of its closely named episode to the video game Among Us. Pending changes protection was added in September 2021, and from then until now, there has been continued vandalism by 1 IP and 4 autoconfirmed users, including some recently that has made me make this request. Pending changes doesn't seem to be working. -. Favre1fan93 (talk) 00:22, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:46, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: @Favre1fan93: Please do not characterize edits you disagree with as vandalism. And aside from one user making edits you don't agree with, the pending changes is working fine. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:46, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Deepfriedokra: Fine about not changing protection, but this isn't edits [I] disagree with. It's clearly vandalism, hence my request. It wouldn't have been made if I just disagreed. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:57, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 08:03, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent LTA activity. wizzito | say hello! 03:26, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:28, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent disruptive editing since merger. wizzito | say hello! 03:39, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:29, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism. wizzito | say hello! 03:59, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:30, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: editor with an apparent COI is persistently removing sourced criticism from the article. Editor has not responded to talk page messages and has changed IP in the past so a simple block is insufficient. Axem Titanium (talk) 04:51, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 10:33, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruption by block evading IP hopperr. Two IPs blocked in last few days, new one pops ujp. FDW777 (talk) 06:47, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 10:33, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruption by block evading IP hopperr. Two IPs blocked in last few days, new one pops ujp. FDW777 (talk) 06:47, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 10:34, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP user disruptive editing. Gusfriend (talk) 08:50, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:40, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Because the article itself is protected, IPs and sock puppet accounts have begun posting to the talk page with various 4chan conspiracy theories (with links to obscure twitter accounts which then link to 4chan) Volunteer Marek 09:06, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:39, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 09:17, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:35, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Trolling wrt Russian invasion — DaxServer (t · m · c) 10:52, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:04, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Trolling wrt Russian invasion — DaxServer (t · m · c) 10:52, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:04, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Due to a fight that occurred at last night's race, this article has become a target of vandalism by several IP users. Areaseven (talk) 12:20, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:26, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Due to a fight that occurred at last night's race, this article has become a target of vandalism by several IP users. Areaseven (talk) 12:20, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:26, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: The page is extended confirmed protected, but autoconfirmed users can still move it. Makes no sense. Should be extended-confirmed or fully move-protected. interstatefive  (talk) - just another roadgeek 15:05, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: @Interstatefive: Should maybe ask @Moneytrees:? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:24, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see a point in changing the protection either way at this time. The page has been a long-time vandalism target and I think that will continue if it is unprotected, I also don't see a point in upping the protection. However, I don't really care and any admin can upgrade or downgrade the protection if they feel like it. MoneytreesTalk🏝️ 03:50, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined (for the bot). El_C 11:49, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuous on-going edit wars. HinduKshatrana (talk) 12:33, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged GS action. El_C 12:45, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Kpddg (talk) 13:08, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 13:14, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Excessive IP vandalism, particularly claiming that the Lost Cause is a "truth" rather than a pseudohistorical mythology. Joe.Del73 (talk) 13:59, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 14:17, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Anonymous IP keeps attempting to change the location of death, without providing annotation. Multiple attempts go as far back as Dec. 4th 2021 as far as I can tell. Leitmotiv (talk) 16:13, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – Two months. EdJohnston (talk) 16:53, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Presistent vd by six accounts. Edit: I think it should be protected for more than just a few days. See also: Sockpuppet investigations/2605:A601:A0C2:9300:5B9:EEE5:F447:4629. lol1VNIO (talkcontribs) 16:32, 9 April 2022 (UTC); Edited 16:51, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Cullen328. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:15, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Clearly there's someone using sock accounts to try and redirect this page as an act of vandalism, but I cannot find a master. Jalen Folf (talk) 17:09, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:14, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:14, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP's consistently removing sourced genres and being reverted when I revert their removals. This is a prominent issue on the article and is the only way for the page to deal with IP genre warriors. Rockmusicfanatic20 (talk) 17:25, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:43, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page should be given some kind of permanent protection level. For months (even years I'd say) it has been a frequent target for Greece-based POV pushing, disruptive editing and vandalism, but in recent weeks it has just become untenable, being swarmed by multiple single-purpose IP accounts (of which two, 109.242.76.6 (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log) and 109.242.76.249 (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log) have been blocked a combined total of four times in the past two weeks only, both for vandalism and block evasion) conducting disruptive edits (such as randomly changing and or editing party figures, which most of the time take days or even weeks to notice) and/or unjustified blanking of content or adding copyrighted logos over and over again. Very recently, single-purpose logged-in accounts seem to have taken an interest in the page as well.

It should be noted that the article was protected between 10 and 24 March, during which there was scarcely any disruption, if any. The disruption level skyrocketed upon unprotection, though. Impru20talk 17:46, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:21, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 17:54, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Alexf. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:22, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . Wiston420 (talk) 14:36, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

بنو حنيفة

this shouldnt be protected anymore because the admins are abusing it to spread misinformation, remove the protection so i can correct their bs

Not done Insufficient information to identify an article. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:48, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Heavily being edited by IPs. No citations being added. Subject is the deputy speaker of Pakistan National Assembly. Pakistan politics is currently under chaos. Requesting protection increase to protect the page from vandalism and spreading of fake news. Thewikizoomer (talk) 18:47, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

correction - Subject is speaker and not deputy speaker Thewikizoomer (talk) 18:51, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:54, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of anonymous vandalism, edit-warring. See this address' edit history. Special:Contributions/67.184.149.126 104.165.250.88 (talk) 20:27, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:45, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because everyone has moved on from the X Factor incident. 2406:3003:2077:3DC5:2044:91B2:B976:C6B9 (talk) 16:07, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected by Gadfium. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:57, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit-warring first by an IP and now by a non-ECP account. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 16:00, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seems unwarranted since the IP's edits were on 5 March 2022. The other editor User:Disansee has previously created one new article in February 2022,[45] which seems to involve good faith edits judging from their preparatory sandbox. Given that background, the WP:3RR warnings[46][47] are puzzling. Mathsci (talk) 16:57, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Edit-warring has little to do with good or bad faith. You stalking me, however (you never edited that page before - [48]), is not the first time, and I've already respectfully asked that you stop doing that. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 17:03, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see edit-warring at the moment. There was a Smart aleck edit-summary with "And I'm the Queen of England". The edit history is self-explanatory.[49] I see no evidence of "stalking". Parenthetically, I have been one of the main contributors to the article Marseille: years ago, in 2007, I added content about La Marseillaise, including this image File:Marche-des-marseillois.jpg. I also added similar images to History of Marseille. Mathsci (talk) 17:54, 9 April 2022 (UTC) [refactoring, new time stamp][reply]
Me using a ridiculous argument to show how the other editor's appeal to authority is not convincing is just that, a bit of ridicule. You never editing a page before, and then coming here to dispute my actions, is clear evidence and needs no further commentary (particularly not off-topic tangents about an unrelated page). RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 17:47, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:59, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Potential edit war from incessant reverting of the removal of the network column in tables relating to his TV work... This has been happening since March, please make it stop! lIl-†V!wanna talk?` 17:40, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 18:00, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent, a lot of vandalism. Drummingman Talk 21:21, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:43, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I log on almost everyday at least for the last week or so to find an IP has "updated" the page with misinformation. If you look at the edit history you will see what I am referring to, at no point does the source say what these IPs are saying it does. Thats another thing I would like to point out, it is always a new IP every time, often ones that have never contributed to wikipedia. For these reasons, I am hoping to get the page semi-protected to prevent this from happening so much. Thank you AFrickingNerd (talk) 14:54, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:58, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am questioning this result. The vandalism appears to be based on Max Park getting an apparent record on the 3x3 average at the Bay Area Speedcubin' 29 PM 2022 competition. However, even though Max Park participated (I made an error in one of my reverts at Speedcubing where I assumed he didn't participate), as of currently the WCA is still working to upload the results. Since the results have not been released yet the record cannot be confirmed currently, and under the assumption there is still reverting going on, this page (as well as Speedcubing) should probably be protected. 172.112.210.32 (talk) 19:18, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SSSB (talk) 22:00, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:14, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP socks of Kung Hibbe repeatedly bypassing a link. Jalen Folf (talk) 22:05, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:11, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

10 April 2022

Reason: Persistent disruption, mostly promotional and or WP:UNDUE. Bbb23 (talk) 22:24, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:59, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Various IPs editing controversial info without consensus for a few days. MB 22:38, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:03, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism returns again immediately expiration of previous protection. This happens over and over and over again. Why keep doing this? Foxworthian (talk) 23:05, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Widr. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:25, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism due to real time crisis unfolding 2022 Pakistani constitutional crisis. Jibran1998 (talk) 19:35, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 03:16, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism Storchy (talk) 20:50, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 03:19, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Amigao (talk) 22:46, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 03:21, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Previous protection expired, shenanigans resumed Volunteer Marek 23:13, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Deepfriedokra. BusterD (talk) 03:23, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Sockpuppetry 2601:901:4300:1CF0:A958:3BCD:2592:9CBB (talk) 00:53, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. BusterD (talk) 03:25, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued addition of unsourced trivia. - FlightTime (open channel) 01:39, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 03:27, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection. Page is being hammered by vandals (event is in progress) Here2rewrite (talk) 01:44, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support, at least till the event is over. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 01:47, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Extraordinarily high amount of vandalism across multiple IPs and accounts. Solipsism 101 (talk) 02:08, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support, at least till the event is over.

Nswix (talk) 02:20, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support, page is being hammered by vandalism. sdpdude9(talk)
>250 edits and/or reversions in the last 24hours. It's impossible to pick through that many edits and distinguish which are in good-faith and which are vandalism. Blue Riband► 02:31, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Cullen328. BusterD (talk) 03:29, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism problem. wizzito | say hello! 02:03, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 03:38, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – persistent DE problem. wizzito | say hello! 02:05, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 04:05, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – unsourced content problem. wizzito | say hello! 02:16, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 04:07, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long history of IP vandalism from various IPs. — Mcguy15 (talk, contribs) 19:18, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Three edits total in the last year? Please read protection policy, linked several times on this page. BusterD (talk) 03:04, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jibran1998 (talk) 19:19, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I see no disruptive editing happening recently. I do see one new account today twice removing uncited information on a WP:BLP. This is not vandalism. This may be a content dispute, so you might take this to the talk page. BusterD (talk) 03:09, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism - car chasm (talk) 02:58, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 04:08, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IPs, as well-meaning as they are, add "World Series champion" to this page pretty much daily, and it repeatedly has to be reverted. Could use a lock for a little while (at least until WS festivities calm down). Nohomersryan (talk) 04:59, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:09, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting protection during ongoing AfD due to disruption by various IPs. Unfortunately a block on an IPV6 /40-range didn't work and they came back with an IPV4 address. – NJD-DE (talk) 18:46, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:00, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:00, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: We'll call it a draw. --Monty Python and the Holy Grail, --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:04, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 10:50, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs violating AfD result by reinstating a page. wizzito | say hello! 01:55, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:17, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:17, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism problem. wizzito | say hello! 02:11, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:15, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:15, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 07:55, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 10:28, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 08:11, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Way too low of activity for indef semi-protection, so Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 10:30, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article is being targeted with refspam from changing IPs advertising a website that claims to sell counterfeit money (not toy money or prop money for legitimate uses but actual counterfeit money to pass off as genuine in illegal transactions!) I have no idea whether the site is "genuine". It seems too unsubtle to be genuine but also too unsubtle to be the cops. Either way, we don't want it in Wikipedia and a bit of semiprotection should persuade them to go away. Not sure if the edits need to be revdelled. DanielRigal (talk) 10:17, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 10:36, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruption by IPs and new accounts on WP:ARBIP article. FDW777 (talk) 10:43, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rather low edit rate (last 50 go back about three months), so Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Feel free to re-request for an upgrade to semi-protection if pending changes can't keep up with the disruption. Ks0stm (TCGE) 10:46, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by an IP user. Sanglahi86 (talk) 09:49, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last 10 edits go back two months. Ks0stm (TCGE) 10:32, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism by a sock, whose disruptive edits I had reverted. Kpddg (talk) 11:37, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:59, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Talk page of unprotected article is currently protected. Maybe it is normal but it seems weird that unconfirmed accounts are able to make edits but not discuss those edits on the talk page. AdrianHObradors (talk) 21:21, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read the rationale behind the protection which was imposed 11 hours ago? CreecregofLife (talk) 21:24, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This looks like an enforcement-related discretionary sanction under WP:ARBEE; administrators cannot unilaterally overturn DS actions as they are considered to be under/invoking ArbCom's authority. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 21:50, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at recent edits on the article, it seems page protection expired a few hours ago and some questionable edits have been happening. An increase on protection level might be in order for the page, specially if talk page is going to still be kept protected. AdrianHObradors (talk) 23:01, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I want to cancel this request as it was done to address a mismatch between the protection levels of the article and talk page, but article page has been protected again for a period longer than the talk page. That fixes the issue. Thanks. AdrianHObradors (talk) 23:45, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:40, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP and new account vandalism for weeks, ever since he showed up on the 'In the News' segment YuriNikolai (talk) 18:05, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Nothing since Aril 4? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:55, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Favonian (talk) 10:50, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit warring over inclusion of accurate information that some editors consider spoilers. Requesting temporary semi-protection. (I believe yesterday's episode was the season finale.) Funcrunch (talk) 06:16, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:54, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism Plpm2021 (talk) 12:02, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:56, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Wretchskull (talk) 14:15, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:26, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by user with multiple IP addresses. Areaseven (talk) 15:23, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 15:43, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continuous and persistent vandalism -- vast majority of edits are reverted. Previous semi-protections didn't stop everything and now expired anyway. Tiredmeliorist (talk) 15:41, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Page has never been semi-protected but the previous pending changes seems to have helped. Let's try a slightly longer period. This controversial page might eventually require an indef protection of some sort. BusterD (talk) 16:40, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 16:21, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 16:57, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism JakeHillion (talk) 16:51, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 17:01, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mass articles edited by sock

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User:Flix11 's IP sock is editing these article actively these days. See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Flix11 Hhkohh (talk) 15:48, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now. Hard to tell what's happening here, which is a longstanding staple of League pages requests. Ironically, very much like Flix11's many requests here, which I declined on that basis. Anyway, Hhkohh, best to at least see what happens in that SPI first, for those reasons and more. El_C 15:02, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Going on for years from IP addresses, throwaway accounts etc. TrangaBellam (talk) 16:10, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Poor call as to duration, BusterD. TrangaBellam (talk) 16:46, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. You're welcome, User:TrangaBellam. There are bigger problems on this page. Please read the protection policy linked several times on this page. This page has never been protected before. We can't apply an indefinite semi-protection unless we've tried a lesser solution first. This also seems to be a content dispute on a CV-type BLP, with talk page mentions of the subject's twitter feedback on this page. Somebody on the page is acting the meatpuppet, doing the subject's bidding. BusterD (talk) 16:54, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I spotted the bidding but this is one of those rare cases where the subject does have a point. I was unaware that the page has been never protected; my apologies. TrangaBellam (talk) 16:56, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate your engaging. Please remember folks here are volunteers trying to help. Let's not discourage them by casually disrespecting their efforts. If you have any problem with my actions, please feel invited to discuss these with me civilly on my talk. BusterD (talk) 17:06, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mvqr (talk) 16:24, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not all ips making edits on this page are vandals, so I kept the protection very short. This page would benefit from much better sourcing, and perhaps a statement on talk explaining sourcing required. BusterD (talk) 17:11, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. GimliDotNet (talk) 17:26, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Specifically, 47.42.97.0 for a month. Favonian (talk) 17:29, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant IP vandalism. BRDude70 (talk) 19:39, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 19:58, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – sock activity. wizzito | say hello! 20:13, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:14, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued disruption and personal attacks in edit summary by IP (who was blocked) and now new user account. Mellk (talk) 20:16, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:19, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CUPIDICAE💕 20:29, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vandalism is not frequent enough to justify semi-protection. MelanieN (talk) 21:22, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Constant vandalism due to real time events surrounding 2022 Pakistani constitutional crisis. Jibran1998 (talk) 20:41, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:28, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Arbitration Enforcement. WP:ARBEE Curbon7 (talk) 21:41, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 22:05, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection or Extended Confirmed protection: Disruptive editing. Can also be ECP'd if appropriate as this is an AE area. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 05:49, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:06, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: regular admin action --Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:06, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:15, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Airtransat236 (talk) 21:50, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. IP user has been blocked for 31 hours. BusterD (talk) 22:08, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Dealer07 using IPs from Greece. Binksternet (talk) 22:06, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 22:26, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Some is vandalism, some is perhaps good faith but disruptive along with a mix of BLP violations. Likely a couple day protection or so will do. S0091 (talk) 22:16, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 22:27, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

11 April 2022

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Leschnei (talk) 13:09, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:27, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Reapply if he gets around the block --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:27, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:45, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: An IP is reverting new related references Sidbishnoi (talk) 13:28, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. The IP was right, Sidbishnoi. Please look at the data in its totality next time. El_C 14:00, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: User talk:2.243.43.99. Apparently, I'm being hostile or personal. What do you know. El_C 14:44, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:45, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – This page have my own settings and no one should be creating this. Airtransat236 (talk) 18:24, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 19:56, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Dealer07, using IPs from Greece. Binksternet (talk) 23:48, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 00:08, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 23:50, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 00:09, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Dealer07, using IPs from Greece. Binksternet (talk) 00:05, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 00:13, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: attempts of false edits 50.239.14.80 (talk) 20:59, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 21:31, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Airtransat236 (talk) 21:55, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 24.154.226.153 (talk · contribs) blocked by BusterD. BusterD (talk) 22:10, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent edit warring over image in infobox. PuzzledvegetableIs it teatime already? 00:10, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator BusterD. Skynet, there is a danger. El_C 00:26, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Airtransat236 (talk) 21:58, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 24.154.226.153 (talk · contribs) blocked by BusterD. BusterD (talk) 22:24, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Block evading editor is continuing edit-war with ever-changing IPs GoodDay (talk) 00:45, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ZzuuzzMelanieN (talk) 03:00, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism. 2001:8003:3C42:2300:499C:3DD0:F37D:E891 (talk) 00:46, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Problem edits are not frequent enough for semi-protection, but the vast majority of edits to this page are problems and are added by non-auto-confirmed editors. So let's see what PC protection can do.  MelanieN (talk) 03:06, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Removal of a category without proper context and the continuation of unsourced additions. NoobMiester96 (talk) 23:59, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. BusterD (talk) 00:10, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism. 2001:8003:3C42:2300:499C:3DD0:F37D:E891 (talk) 00:24, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edit April 4. El_C 00:28, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent vandalism. 2001:8003:3C42:2300:499C:3DD0:F37D:E891 (talk) 00:27, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 00:28, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent vandalism. 2001:8003:3C42:2300:499C:3DD0:F37D:E891 (talk) 00:27, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. IP, please stop. El_C 00:29, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism User4edits (talk) 02:36, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:09, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism: since the start of March there have been 56 edits, of which 26 have been reverted by at least 16 others. Of 53 non-autoconfirmed editors since the start of the year, I counted only 5 that made somewhat useful contributions. Reywas92Talk 05:23, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Due to the extensive history of protection, Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Ks0stm (TCGE) 10:01, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – persistent spam, etc. wizzito | say hello! 05:24, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 10:03, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Continual addition of unsourced material by IPs, 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine-related. Endwise (talk) 05:25, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Indeed it is, bot. Well done. Lectonar (talk) 08:08, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly-visible template. Recent (discussed) color change has been widely contested (see Module:Storm categories/categories history, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Weather § Comments) and both of these pages have had disruptive reverts. /colors is included since this is able to override the colors in the /categories set. {{Storm colour}} in particular used to be template-protected. Template has 4,855 transclusions anyway (module has 4,889), so template protection wouldn't be too much.

Template protected indefinitely. Ks0stm (TCGE) 09:58, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – Two serious BLP infringements (possibly the second is by a sock account of the first) but as neither was autoconfirmed it would help to semi-protect the article for a few days. 10mmsocket (talk) 07:50, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. That said, I have changed the visiblity of said edits, and watchlisted the article. Lectonar (talk) 08:02, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks I appreciate you taking a look. I just messaged you about the edit by User:Mikeh2000 which also needs rev-del in my opinion. 10mmsocket (talk) 08:38, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Can the page be protected for ever? Its vandalism has been going for years. The page was unprotected about a two weeks ago but in about seven days the page was vandalised four times. Dr Salvus 11:22, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Forever seems so final...Lectonar (talk) 11:45, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because limiting editing amounts to a suppression of free speech. I regularly read the subreddit GenZedong and it’s current characterization as controversial is without merit. Most of the assertions posted are backed by valid sources and for me at it is a welcome respite from the usual garbage that infests Reddit. This includes a subreddit called “r/classicalfascist”. Rkissinger82 (talk) 04:10, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Look, what free speech means might allude you, but it doesn’t justify unprotecting a page. You are more than welcome to make edit requests on the talkpage--CreecregofLife (talk) 04:15, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Please use edit request(s). Lectonar (talk) 07:48, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
As the 1st Amendment itself says, "Congress shall make no law...". What you're essentially arguing is that you have no right to tell someone who's spouting stuff you're not personally comfortable hearing or having your family hear to leave your house. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 08:34, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Increased levels of Disruption & Vandalism by various IPs in recent history. Shadowwarrior8 (talk) 09:30, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last disruptive edit yesterday, before that about a week ago. Lectonar (talk) 11:46, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. That's what I was originally thinking, Lectonar, but the article was last protected from Oct to Jan and it is still plagued by these same issues (though it ebbs and flows). Anyway, obviously applied prior to reading the above. I'm open to amending, in any case. El_C 11:51, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) @El C: I saw that. I still think it doesn't need semi...pd might be an option I guess. Lectonar (talk) 11:54, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected. El_C 12:06, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:35, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jibran1998 (talk) 11:53, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:09, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 12:03, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:21, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – DE continues right off protection. wizzito | say hello! 05:31, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:37, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

157.49.231.156 (talk) 11:17, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Page not specified. Lectonar (talk) 11:20, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

157.49.231.156 (talk) 11:18, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Page not specified. Lectonar (talk) 11:21, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Veracious ^(•‿•)^ 10:13, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 11:47, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 11:38, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 11:43, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent history of vandalism by a wide range of IPs. Isabelle 🏳‍🌈 14:58, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 15:16, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi Protection: IP user and bot user of the 2022 in Philippine television they make hoax, vandalism and unsourced schedule of the upcoming program and channels. Kindly semi-protection of the page to prevent vandalism of the page. Rvreyes 11 (talk) 08:45, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Still can't tell what's happening, Rvreyes 11. You will need evidence in the form of WP:DIFFs. El_C 11:45, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
kindly Click the link, ip user and bot user they make the hoax and unsourced schedule of the page.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2022_in_Philippine_television&action=history Rvreyes 11 (talk) 13:58, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If DECLINE again, pls kindly remove the request its OK .. Rvreyes 11 (talk) 14:04, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No, sorry, it is not okay. Please only submit again with the relevant diffs attached. Thanks. El_C 14:16, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also, there's no need to link to the revision history, it's already linked at the top of this request under history. Anyway, you need to explain better, with diff evidence and summaries — what is a hoax? Why it's a hoax. So you're encouraged to do that. Again, the documentation can be found at WP:DIFF. Thanks again. El_C 14:21, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
they unsourced of schedule of upcoming shows and channels (like street fighter, city hunter etc..)[50] Rvreyes 11 (talk) 14:26, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, but everything in that very long list is unsourced. What source are you using? Doesn't look like there's a lot of sources used in general on that page, not just from one random IP. If this is to be resolved in a meaningful way, at least. El_C 14:54, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Various ip addresses have been starting inappropriate discussions/spamming the Talk with nonsense that have nothing to do with improving the article at all on the Talk non-stop, please see the Talk page history. — YoungForever(talk) 17:14, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 17:47, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IPs disrupting the article. A semi-protection of 1 to 3 days should be enough to spoil the fun. The Banner talk 17:37, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 17:52, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Request semi protect for controversial military figure involved in Ukraine invasion by Russia. Repeat vandalism from different IP-accounts. Page is currently unprotected. ErnestKrause (talk) 17:42, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 17:56, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism on BLP: the perpetrators just realised the previous protection ran out. Struway2 (talk) 18:09, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:41, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 18:15, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator TheresNoTime. Favonian (talk) 18:41, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Continued addition of made-up names. Loafiewa (talk) 15:09, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 17:44, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 16:58, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 17:45, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of nationalist/sectarian disruptive editing of late, people insisting that because a TV show is set in Northern Ireland the show is clearly Irish (or Northern Irish) despite the fact that the company that makes it is very much a British (or specifically English) company. I'm very much involved here so I cannot do it, but with the new series just starting the disruption is about to get much worse so I think a extended semi-protection for a fair period of time is justified here. The disruption is nothing new, it's just ramping up for another go around right now. Canterbury Tail talk 19:47, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:51, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing and vandalism by IP users. I regularly find cases of this when the page is not protected. He's a frequent target and I'd like to request a longer, if not permanent, protection for this page. I don't see it ever stopping by IP users due to the nature of Tyreek Hill's past. Hey man im josh (talk) 21:42, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Ks0stm (TCGE) 22:21, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism from IP addresses. Wesoree (talk) 21:49, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – By multiple IP's. —Mythdon (talkcontribs) 22:20, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 22:23, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

12 April 2022

Reason: High level of IP vandalism by IP hopper. BattleshipMan (talk) 22:38, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – More intensive "eat cack" vandalism from the same two areas in the UK as before (Sheffield and London). Dhtwiki (talk) 23:36, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:25, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandals changing "allegiance" section in the infobox for reasons unknown. Sumanuil. 23:54, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:17, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I am trying to write a Paper for School on Pearl Harbor and found all your information helpful but I need the page to be unprotected so I can put this source in my paper and give the writers credit for all their hard work in putting their time and energy into this wonderful page on the Attack of Pearl Harbor 137.118.157.194 (talk) 13:45, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian (talk) 13:50, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
FYI - the Pearl Harbor page has had 4,261different editors, since it was created on April 8, 2001 - some of them were IPs and some were registered Wikipedia editors, but probably too many for you to list on your paper. The individual sources they used can be found at the bottom of the page in the Bibliography section. There are 1,186 editors watching the page, some of whom might not be active anymore. — Maile (talk) 18:49, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It is not necessary to be able to edit the page to cite it. That's a non sequitur, I'm afraid. Please see Wikipedia:Citing Wikipedia. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:10, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also why would they need to put into the page in order to do their paper? Almost seems as if to smooth out manufactured discrepancies... CreecregofLife (talk) 20:53, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Never cite Wikipedia. Instead, cite what it cites. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 21:25, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Recently one of the members got into a scandal, and so there are many people who keep trying to edit that she left or that she never existed in the group, despite her being a current member still. I also tried addressing it in the talk page but people continue to ignore it. K-popguardian (talk) 21:44, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:32, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of spamming; see [51][52][53][54]Bri (talk) 22:32, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:29, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism continued after protection lifted after April 3, 2022. Cassiopeia talk 00:27, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:33, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 01:00, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting indef protection given repeated temporary protection for more than a decade hasn't worked. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 01:02, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. Ks0stm (TCGE) 01:02, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, @Ks0stm! Tol (talk | contribs) @ 01:04, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP jumper continues to add links to videos as references against WP:YT and are not verifiable as the episode numbers/dates in the YouTube video title. AldezD (talk) 01:01, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AldezD, that is not "vandalism," please don't misuse the term (see WP:NOTVAND). El_C 02:39, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Loafiewa (talk) 01:18, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 02:40, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kpddg (talk) 01:55, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 02:42, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated malicious tampering by Indonesian IP addresses. ケンカッキー (talk) 22:44, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 00:27, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated malicious tampering by Indonesian IP addresses. ケンカッキー (talk) 22:46, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 00:27, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous changing of citizenship, ongoing for years, many discussions in talk archives. - FlightTime (open channel) 00:35, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Not enough recent activity by non-autoconfirmed users. Bbb23 (talk) 00:47, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There is vandalism from Imran Khan supporters. I had edited the page to remove the vandalism Pikachu3408 (talk) 19:40, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Drmies. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:52, 11 April 2022 (UTC): Note: Chupacabra? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:52, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 08:56, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA activity on this page; see WP:LTA/D86 for more info thx. wizzito | say hello! 01:21, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 02:41, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism followed by created accounts. Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 07:50, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:54, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Why does this article extended confirmed protection? No reason for protection. 2001:8003:3C42:2300:499C:3DD0:F37D:E891 (talk) 00:48, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because of JackSucksAtLife spam that was relentless the first time around and which is still a potential issue based on the talk page posts. That being said, I can see an argument to bust it back down to semi. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 01:01, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
courtesy ping @Primefac: last protecting admin. Lectonar (talk) 07:49, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I bumped it to ECP because there were a number of AC editors who kept adding it. If folks are fine with me handing out "you should bloody well know better" blocks if the disruption resumes, I'm fine with dropping the protection. Primefac (talk) 11:19, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
We could try semi protection and see how it works. I'm also fine with "you should bloody well know better" blocks in this instance. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:06, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ditto. There's been little talk page motion (three or four edits of this calibre in two years), so I'm fine with testing semi and handing out blocks for AC users who persist with this. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 21:24, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done Downprotected to semi. Lectonar (talk) 07:44, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Change 'British teen drama' to 'Irish teen drama' as anyone who watched even one episode of the show would recognise that the teens strongly identify as Irish and it is one of the main premises of the show

Write your request ABOVE this line and do not remove the curly brackets below. if you need a reference for the change from 'British' to 'Irish', I have it here:

https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2020/may/18/derry-girls-criminally-underrated-irish-sitcom-fuses-hilarity-with-political-heft — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tayto1 (talkcontribs) 20:39, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the production company is British, then it is a British series. This is something that has been discussed on the talk page, and consensus is that this is a British show for the reasons I just stated. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 21:15, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done – What JC said. Furthermore, as it says at the top of this section, requests like this one belong at Talk:Derry Girls. Favonian (talk) 21:56, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Moderate level of IP vandalism. Unexplained removal. Also at risk of partisan vandalism due to incoming Philippine general elections in May. Nuwordlife0rder (talk) 04:22, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:24, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: 500/30 protection per WP:PIA. FDW777 (talk) 07:01, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. BusterD (talk) 08:48, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Don't know why, but there has been a run of BLP-violating attacks on this article in the last day or so. [55] [56] [57] etc. Meters (talk) 07:28, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 08:51, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism from user Merchancano ProEra30047 (talk) 06:04, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 07:15, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism from user Merchancano ProEra30047 (talk) 06:04, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 07:15, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing by several IPs. BilCat (talk) 10:09, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 10:50, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: No basis apparent for not permitting page creation? Sunbeamonice (talk) 19:41, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read the logs? CreecregofLife (talk) 20:03, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Clearly there was a basis for not permitting page creation. This included an unsourced BLP, and unambiguous promotion and copyright infringement. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:10, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Sunbeamonice: We're not going to allow you to short-circuit the review process by moving the page directly into mainspace. A reviewer will do so when the article is reviewed and deemed up to standards, not before. (Besides, if you move a page into mainspace, you accept the potential consequences of that action.) —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 21:28, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And while we're at it, your draft has most of the exact same issues as described above, and its lede is a copyright violation (plagiarising responsibletravel.com). —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 21:31, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined See explanation above. Lectonar (talk) 07:41, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I've been protecting this page for quite some time. It has been a center of IP vandalization and sock abuse but just today I realized it needed serious protection after some IP user decided to completely vandalize the page. Ayaltimo (talk) 06:14, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I've applied a final warning to the IP's talk page. They have not edited the page in the last 24 hours; no protection is required at this moment. However, if they do misbehave soon, someone, perhaps I, will block them to prevent further mishap. Thanks for your page watching. BusterD (talk) 08:43, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. KshatranaHindu (talk) 08:32, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User talk pages are there to communicate messages and warnings if any. Your repeatedly moving of pages, creating a copy artie, blanking an article, despite multiple warnings on your talk page may lead to you being banned from editing wikipedia. Read the warnings before you delete them. You can't have your talk page protected. Sajaypal007 (talk) 08:38, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined I have also move-protected Rajput architecture. Lectonar (talk) 08:58, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: KshatranaHindu (talk · contribs) blocked by BusterD. (edit conflict) BusterD (talk) 09:01, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A troll is making new accounts and changing the subject's preferred pronouns. – 2.O.Boxing 10:14, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 10:57, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 10:57, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Great fuckin' composer. Check out "Mirror Temple" on the Fall spongspam. El_C 12:09, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA activity. wizzito | say hello! 05:08, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:38, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA activity. wizzito | say hello! 05:08, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:39, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA activity. wizzito | say hello! 05:08, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:40, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA activity. wizzito | say hello! 05:09, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:48, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Qwerfjkltalk 09:23, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:53, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:53, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: the page needs protection because constant addition by IP address without WP: Consensus. Banned suspected sock account with IP addresses are reverting edits from time to time to push their points. RS6784 (talk) 09:28, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. (partial block. /43) --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:58, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Removal of content and blanking by several IPs despite reverts. Dove's talk (talk) 13:03, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 13:32, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – PC isn't cutting it. A look at the edit history will show that nearly all edits by IPs and non-ACs are vandalism or otherwise disruptive. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 13:25, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The page doesn't quite have the protection history I'd want to see before going indef on the semi-protection. Also note I left the indefinite pending changes up, so after the semi-protection expires it will go back to pending changes with hopefully less vandalism. Ks0stm (TCGE) 13:30, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandal appears to be back. Cannolis (talk) 03:06, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:55, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Someone on different IP keeps making changes without explanation or apparent notice of my edit summary: "Back to last stable version, this broke refs, added dab links, blocks of unsourced/likely copied and unattibuted text, and changes made with no explanation or edit summary". 176.97.70.48 (talk) 12:30, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:37, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:37, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Obviously, a page about a popular TV series gets a lot of the stereotypical "schoolboy vandalism" and a lot of other disruption. A look at the history shows that most recent edits are indeed that or reverts of that... (and seemingly the recently expired PC didn't really prevent that, nor has it stopped since then). RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 14:10, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:16, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Someone on different IP keeps making changes without explanation or apparent notice of my edit summary: "Back to last stable version, this broke refs, added dab links, blocks of unsourced/likely copied and unattibuted text, and changes made with no explanation or edit summary". 176.97.71.80 (talk) 15:00, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 16:00, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:14, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Someone on different IP keeps making changes without explanation or apparent notice of my edit summary: "Back to last stable version, this broke refs, added dab links, blocks of unsourced/likely copied and unattibuted text, and changes made with no explanation or edit summary". 176.97.71.80 (talk) 15:17, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:00, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of vandalism as TFA. ZLEA T\C 15:53, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 16:04, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Persistent edit warring. BilCat (talk) 05:28, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:47, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Gentlemen! You can't fight in here. This is the war room. --Dr Strangelove --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:47, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:01, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistant IP and SPA vandalism. - Kevo327 (talk) 16:47, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 17:05, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Black Lives Matter founder, you can guess the rest. FDW777 (talk) 17:15, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. BusterD (talk) 17:28, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:05, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 16:01, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Someone on different IP keeps making changes without explanation or apparent notice of my edit summary: "Back to last stable version, this broke refs, added dab links, blocks of unsourced/likely copied and unattibuted text, and changes made with no explanation or edit summary". 176.97.71.80 (talk) 15:17, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:01, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:01, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: High-risk template – Seems to have been overlooked in Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2022/04#Tropical cyclone color-related templates. The exact same logic applies. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:35, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. BusterD (talk) 17:42, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Is the subject of today's Google Doodle. — Coolperson177 (t|c) 17:52, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:39, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: BLP violations with unsourced or poorly sourced claims that he changed his last name. They even desperately insert the poor sources in the title of the infobox. Trillfendi (talk) 16:05, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: already semi protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:13, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I didn’t notice someone protected it today. It didn’t seem like it the way the editing was going. Trillfendi (talk) 16:24, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:13, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Persistent edit warring involving multiple editors on nationality, ″Chechen born″ vs ″Russian born″, requesting that the current protection is increased to extended confirmed so that they are forced to use the talk page and gain consensus. TylerBurden (talk) 18:15, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:24, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Increasing anonymous vandalism / nonsensical IP edits MrEarlGray (talk) 18:49, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:26, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated removal of "promotional tone" tag without explanation by changing IP, see also concerns at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#Tom Devine. DuncanHill (talk) 16:36, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 17:07, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continuous disruptive editing and vandalism (mostly from IPs). Keeps happening immediately after the temporary protection expires. ArojamDharkon (talk) 19:25, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:28, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Evidently because the subject died today. Too much unconstructive editing. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 19:37, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be a lot of rapid editing back and forth regarding his death. Different users are adding and removing sourced information. 207.237.237.222 (talk) 19:59, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator zzuuzz. Favonian (talk) 20:31, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi Protection: IP s continue to add a non-existent category to these pages. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:30, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question: UnitedStatesian, "IPs" or IP (singular)? El_C 00:13, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Corrected. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:02, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What communication have you attempted with the IP to explain the problem, UnitedStatesian? El_C 02:30, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well, that category has to be populated in order to exist. There's isn't some principle of equivalence, it doesn't work like that. El_C 02:30, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
All listed here articles should be placed into this Luhansk PR category. 92.113.168.56 (talk) 05:16, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You can go to WP:AFCRC to request the category be created. UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:00, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:59, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: And once populated the category will exist. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:59, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Having said that, it looks redundant to existing, populated category (Not for me to say.) --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:01, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not really that knowledgeable about WP:CAT, myself, to be clear. El_C 12:12, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:02, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Loafiewa (talk) 21:05, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ponyo. Ks0stm (TCGE) 21:31, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by IP vandals. One won't believe how many times I and other users have had to fix mistakes made by vandals. TheVHSArtist (talk) 21:42, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:07, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent non-constructive posts to talk page. ZimZalaBim talk 21:48, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:09, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

13 April 2022

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 3 years of protection, still gets vandalised by IPs. BangJan1999 22:44, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. — Maile (talk) 23:18, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mellk (talk) 22:54, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 23:08, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. M.Bitton (talk) 22:56, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 23:14, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Aircorn (talk) 23:16, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 00:00, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism Sikova na Ositerelia (talk) 23:36, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. 15 previous protections. That's enough. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:34, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism Sikova na Ositerelia (talk) 23:38, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:36, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Repeated attempts by multiple users to create an article from the redirect, ignoring the hidden note that the subject in question fails WP:NACTOR. Requesting for extended confirmed because all of the users have been anonymous or registered, and indefinite because the subject is unlikely to pass WP:NACTOR in the foreseeable future. InfiniteNexus (talk) 00:42, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. All of this is from IPs or newly registered accounts which makes me suspect sock/meat puppetry. If someone thinks the subject rates an article they can discuss it with an experienced (EC) editor or take it to WP:AFC. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:51, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism is persistent. wizzito | say hello! 00:46, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:54, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long period of edit warring and unsourced changes to nationality. Mellk (talk) 00:50, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:57, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extend-confirmed: BLP policy violations – Reoccurring issue with MOS:GENDERID, even with the current protection. I think extended confirmed is needed. Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 04:54, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Iamreallygoodatcheckers This is the decrease request page, not the increase CreecregofLife (talk) 05:23, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@CreecrogofLife: My bad. Sorry! Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 05:24, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, I just figured the direction would be helpful CreecregofLife (talk) 05:48, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:35, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Regular admin action. Let me know if they're not the only one in need of education re: blp --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:35, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: or MOS:GENDERID --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:39, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
So regular WP:GENSEX action, then. Good stuff. Don't forget to log sustainably. ;) El_C 14:06, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Ad Orientem (talk) 02:23, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism of the type you'd expect on this page. A. C. SantacruzPlease ping me! 19:27, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. A. C. Santacruz: In general we are reluctant to protect article talk pages, unless the vandalism is out of control or violates WP policies, and even then we protect only for a short term. That's because when the main article is indefinitely protected, as this one is, the talk page is the only place where new or unregistered editors can have any input. Yes, this page does get vandalized with some regularity, but the solution is simply to have regular editors delete the vandalism edits - as I see happens very promptly at this article. MelanieN (talk) 22:01, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Ad Orientem (talk) 02:23, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent vandalism Sikova na Ositerelia (talk) 23:36, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:33, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Ad Orientem (talk) 02:23, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism, sockpuppetry, and unsourced content problem. wizzito | say hello! 01:26, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Somewhere around 16 previous protections in addition to pending. That's enough. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:31, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Ad Orientem (talk) 02:24, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Engr. Smitty Werben 02:19, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:21, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Ad Orientem (talk) 02:24, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 02:32, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. 24 previous protections. That's enough. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:36, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism - wolf 03:40, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 04:02, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, claiming that he's dead. Storchy (talk) 03:42, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ks0stm. Ks0stm (TCGE) 03:59, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – No fewer than 30 edits in the past two days attempting to change this football manager's team and then repair that damage. Can we please double the last term of protection?. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:07, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I thought for sure the week would be enough the first time, but I guess I was wrong. As requested this time, we'll go Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 04:10, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Request for semi-protection in order to discourage an IP-hopping vandal who's returning to put back in false information and edit-war to protect said false information Mr Fink (talk) 03:56, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 04:14, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: there is a Member of the Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly from Bharatiya Janata Party from Bisalpur, Pilibhit who has won election as an Member of the Legislative Assembly and I am willing to make the page on this politician see sources [58] [59] [60] [61] Suryabeej   talk 08:53, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For context see here. This here is a different Vivek Verma. Lectonar (talk) 09:17, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Lectonar Yes this is why I asked to lower the protection so that I can create this Politicians page not the music guy one.Suryabeej   talk 09:21, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Would you object to my unprotection, Lectonar? Sdrqaz (talk) 22:03, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
: Done Not at all...and I just unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 06:39, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because it dosen't need protection anymore. 122.11.214.194 (talk) 06:14, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That is circular and invalid reasoning--CreecregofLife (talk) 06:18, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined No reaason given. Lectonar (talk) 06:44, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
However, I did take a look, and it seems it's been protected since June 2011. It's been protected for over ten years. Whoever the vandals it had, they're probably long gone CreecregofLife (talk) 06:51, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Lots of disruptive editing over the past few days primarily by IPs. Only going to get worse in the coming week. Would recommend a 1 week semi protection. IIBxtrerII (talk) 04:19, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:04, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism even with pending revision lock. INeedSupport 😷 04:41, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:19, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Victoria is Britney Spears' current assistant and is routinely being accused of being a part of Britney's controversial conservatorship. There is a very active conspiracy theory that Britney's conservatorship was never terminated and Britney is not free. I have seen no evidence this is true. Victoria has been experiencing ongoing online harassment. 73.134.49.225 (talk) 04:55, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:20, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism regarding subject's DOB (which is disputed, but sourced) BlameRuiner (talk) 06:23, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:22, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Biju Kuttan is and indian film comedy actor. protect this page Ssvlogs369 (talk) 07:54, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Favonian (talk) 08:42, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: COI/Paid editors trying to force "their" version of the article. A long term problem which has has previously been dealt with by 4 rangeblocks, still in force, but are now using other Wind Telecom accounts to avoid these blocks. For details please see User:Arjayay/Italian Telecom - Arjayay (talk) 10:37, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Disruption not heavy enough for semi-protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:33, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please protect this page. this is genuine person. he is an indian film maker Ssvlogs369 (talk) 07:44, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This is a draft; protection would prevent helpful edits. Also no disruption so far. @Ssvlogs369: Please read our protection policy if you haven't done so so far. Lectonar (talk) 07:52, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Biju Kuttan is an indian comedy actor. Ssvlogs369 (talk) 07:56, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – As it says at the top of this section, Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here. Talk:Biju Kuttan is open for business. Favonian (talk) 08:37, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. EthanGaming7640 13:24, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 13:35, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pattern of IP vandalism starting up today. Geoff | Who, me? 14:24, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 14:30, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Doesn't need protection. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 18:41, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The history is a bit confusing as there are a couple of page moves but it seems it was protected in 2011 due to violations of the biographies of living persons policy. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:16, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That was 11 years ago though, I don't see why it needs protection now. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 01:57, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Number 57: protecting admin. Lectonar (talk) 07:47, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I didn't protect this article – I moved it at some point, and the pre-existing protection moved with it. The original protection was done by Prodego (last seen in December 2021). Cheers, Number 57 08:04, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, but you had at least some contact with the article :). Nevermind. Lectonar (talk) 08:27, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected. It has been long enough and protection can be re-requested should disruption recur. Time will tell. Sdrqaz (talk) 11:54, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected – for the bot. No, it's not the same template as above. Favonian (talk) 12:51, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive edits by a dynamic IP. – Uanfala (talk) 13:45, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ks0stm (TCGE) 14:32, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 14:28, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 14:28, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 14:41, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 15:24, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because it dosen't need it anymore because the vandals are gone and it has been protected for ten years. 2406:3003:2077:3DC5:5091:A72A:EF9F:E60C (talk) 13:35, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Based on what I can see, this page appears to have been pre-emptively semi-protected shortly after it was created, without any obvious evidence of active vandalism that I can see. It has been indefinitely protected for 10 years. I'm going to unprotect it and see if any vandalism occurs. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 15:39, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Glad for this. The first time it was requested it was declined because of circular reasoning, but as you have found, there actually was a case CreecregofLife (talk) 15:45, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 04:39, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 15:48, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – again…. EthanGaming7640 13:43, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:26, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dove's talk (talk) 15:00, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Three separate new accounts vandalized this in a similar manner all today. Due to the Canadiens-Maple Leafs rivalry, this is a pretty high vandalism target for Leafs fans. I smell dirty gym socks. dannymusiceditor oops 16:23, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated attempts to refactor other users' comments with no explanation. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:12, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:15, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@LuK3: 5 disruptive attempts in the past month to refactor others' comments is not enough to justify protection?! InfiniteNexus (talk) 16:37, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Dr Salvus 15:00, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 20:14, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. InfiniteNexus (talk) 17:15, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 20:16, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already done by administrator Bbb23. Less Unless (talk) 20:17, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism today, 4/13/22. SPF121188 (talk this way) (contribs) 18:51, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 20:21, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Chela (talk) 18:53, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Less Unless (talk) 20:21, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TornadoLGS (talk) 19:02, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – False names added by IPs in the range Special:Contributions/2604:3D08:BA80:1910:0:0:0:0/64. Binksternet (talk) 16:39, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Again.
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 21:25, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Please can we have another time-out on this article as the same author is persisting in pushing content for which there is no consensus. 10mmsocket (talk) 16:51, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 21:20, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Removal of content by an IP user who wishes to censor content. It appears as though that IP user registered an account and continued to try to censor the page. Requesting Extended confirmed user be needed to edit this page. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:55, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 21:32, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:37, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. But where's Cow Man? El_C 21:28, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Temporary quasi-preservation:" Continuous disruptive edit - someone on different IP keeps making changes without explanation or explicit notice of my edit summary: probable and unrecoverable text, and changes made without explanation or editing summary". ,2409:4052:4D09:7EC0:0:0:BA4B:390D (talk) 16:19, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism. Pyramids09 (talk) 18:27, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – NPOV by 86.6.156.93 and User:Maxharford. Vandalism by the remaining IPs. lol1VNIO[not Lol1VNIO] (talk • contribs) 21:42, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 22:23, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. lol1VNIO[not Lol1VNIO] (talk • contribs) 22:18, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Muboshgu. Favonian (talk) 22:23, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: was bAD Ads BAD 2A05:4F44:B15:9C00:99FB:8D91:777F:F652 (talk) 18:37, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Surely you jest? This page has never been protected. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 19:24, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Balderdash! Favonian (talk) 19:27, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

14 April 2022

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP edit wars over nationality. Mellk (talk) 16:34, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless (talk) 20:10, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Changing stats, etcRedPatch (talk) 17:38, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 20:17, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Pov-push since 2019. Semsûrî (talk) 19:09, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 20:22, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: COI/Paid editors trying to force "their" version of the article. A long term problem which has has previously been dealt with by 4 rangeblocks, still in force, but are now using other Wind Telecom accounts to avoid these blocks. For details please see User:Arjayay/Italian Telecom - Arjayay (talk) 19:15, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 20:22, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason:: Valid and well researched material connected to the subject being constantly deleted by a number of disagreeing editors.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bonggrow (talkcontribs)

Not done Please advertise your book elsewhere. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:16, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -Alabama- (talk) 22:25, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. TylerBurden (talk) 00:20, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 04:11, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:27, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 04:14, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: One of the biggest clubs warrants page protection 2601:245:4501:1A90:B15A:CA40:B2EE:353E (talk) 00:44, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 04:20, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent vandalism/disruptive editing from many users. HappyWithWhatYouHaveToBeHappyWith (talk) 00:50, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The article is too heavily edited for PC to work well. MelanieN (talk) 04:23, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: An unregistered editor is using multiple IP addresses to edit the article to insert promotional language. They make no effort to explain their edits in edit summaries or the section opened in the Talk page specifically to discuss these edits. Multiple editors have reverted these edits and attempted to discuss them with the editor and they have not responded in any way except to revert their preferred edits back into the article. ElKevbo (talk) 01:50, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 04:29, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Highly controversial and increasingly notable event that is already seeing IP vandalism in the article. WMrapids (talk) 02:28, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 04:32, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism has gone up over the past day or so. wizzito | say hello! 00:18, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blockedMelanieN (talk) 04:07, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 00:28, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 04:16, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Curbon7 (talk) 01:31, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 04:25, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Some serious BLP violations in recent days. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 02:42, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:28, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection - significant amounts of vandalism from IP and non-autoconfirmed editors related to the results of a recent game. Should just need a couple of days. Egsan Bacon (talk) 03:17, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:31, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – On going observance. Heavy disruptive edits by new users and IPs. Zayeem (talk) 04:09, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:32, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – dynamic IP - only edits adding a redundant name to cast list. Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:43, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:34, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – vandalism problem. wizzito | say hello! 05:29, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:35, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent unsourced content problem. wizzito | say hello! 05:33, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:38, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA target. wizzito | say hello! 05:38, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:39, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA target. wizzito | say hello! 05:39, 14 April 2022 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:39, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Continously used for test editing. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 08:47, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 10:42, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Also sockpuppetry. twotwofourtysix(My talk page and contributions) 09:21, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Temporary? No! El_C 10:45, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Probably falls under some Arbcom sancctions (can't remember which ones exactly). In any case, persistent disruption despite previous protections doesn't seem to stop. Edits are sporadic, but very few if any is anything coming from IPs/non-ACs is anything but disruptive or vandalism. Long-term SP seems like the solution, I'm not sure PC would stop anything as disruption is likely to come along ethno-nationalistic or other similar grounds, where people are unlikely to be stopped by it. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 01:38, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 10:26, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disruption resumed by IP socks after page got automatically unprotected. Azuredivay (talk) 11:48, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Notes: covered by WP:CASTE, second full protection this month. El_C 12:15, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism and edit warring, and racially motivated edits 77.96.159.195 (talk) 12:04, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Looks like you are the edit warrior. Please stop. I've given you the second warning for edit warring in two days. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:15, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I've inadvertantly involved myself because filer's edits looked to me to be so outrageous, so someone else will need to decide on protection. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:15, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 12:20, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The edits made by other user new (now blocked) user were racially motivated and based on unreliable sources. This was reverted. 77.96.159.195 (talk) 12:42, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Block evasion by User:Dealer07 using a new sockpuppet account. Binksternet (talk) 12:52, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 13:58, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent unsourced addition of "available for streaming on Netflix" to the lead by multiple IPs. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 13:20, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 14:00, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Insanely high level of vandalism, also a very controversial subject. Fijipedia (talk) 13:37, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 14:02, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Unregistered or IP users are making contant unconstructive edits and vandalism the page. SadX (talk) 12:12, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:20, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:22, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi protection - Reason: Disruptive edits/reverts by Anon IPs and use of Self Published sources mainly Blogs by Anon Users. Mr.User200 (talk) 13:11, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:56, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Every single IP or non-autoconfirmed edit for the past year has been disruptive, time to stop this now. Sincere souls can always make edit requests. Shellwood (talk) 14:23, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 16:34, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandals and potential for edit war. A small edit war between many IP addresses (which are being used for block evasion) and admins can be stopped with semi protection. Wesoree (talk) 16:01, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism with single-purpose accounts Phiarc (talk) 17:40, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeat CIR edits by IPs and new users. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 17:57, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This has been protected due to repeated re-creation; I would suggest, if not lowering the protection, at least having an admin make it a redirect to John Morgan (lawyer), the firm's founder. Trivialist (talk) 19:49, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's been seven and a half years since the page was protted. A redirect seems reasonable, without protection, under the understanding that the redirect will get protected if there's any effort to hijack it for an article on the firm. What say you admins? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 19:55, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not an admin so I can't enact, but I will endorse CreecregofLife (talk) 19:57, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I endorse redirect as per Jéské Couriano Above Suryabeej   talk 07:12, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:49, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive redirect overwriting; none of the attempts address concerns raised. Jalen Folf (talk) 02:45, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 18:28, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Kpddg (talk) 14:00, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Two IPs since the 11th is not enough, in my opinion. Both have seemingly stopped their disruption. Sdrqaz (talk) 16:34, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Article was temporarily protected for same reason last September. Generalrelative (talk) 16:20, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Draft of a salted article, and no reason for creation either. 209.249.71.60 (talk) 18:08, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – The page was primitive vandalism, created by you. It's unlikely to be created by anyone but you, so I can think of a better precaution. Favonian (talk) 18:26, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High amounts of IP vandalism by several unregistered users over the past day. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:18, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 18:35, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. –MJLTalk 18:23, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

to match GeorgeNotFoundMJLTalk 18:24, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 18:36, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: 500/30 protection per WP:PIA. FDW777 (talk) 18:35, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 18:36, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent COI editing to add mundane trivia and remove RS content. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 19:58, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 20:44, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent COI editing to add mundane trivia and remove RS content. It's the same group of editors who are on the Eurochem page (Melnichenko runs Eurochem). Snooganssnoogans (talk) 19:58, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 20:45, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

15 April 2022

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Aircorn (talk) 22:25, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Favonian (talk) 22:58, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent unsourced BLP vio's by an IP. - FlightTime (open channel) 22:33, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 23:12, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There has not been a single confirmed case of vandalism on the page in the 19 years it has existed. The presence of protection is seriously hampers any efforts to improve and expand the article. Requesting that protection level be decreased or removed altogether. BUZZLIGHTYEAR99 (talk) 19:38, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – The article is protected per this arbitration enforcement. Favonian (talk) 19:42, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism to a BLP article Xfansd (talk) 20:07, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP address with a wide range still continues to edit war the lead section of the article despite being reverted several times by multiple different people. it's really getting old. Second Skin (talk) 21:10, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Addition of made up nicknames by the same IP on list of submachine guns. Loafiewa (talk) 23:45, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 30 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 00:24, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – long-term persistent vandalism. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 22:53, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 04:14, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of the Fairchild Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II to the list of Kartveli's designs, often using Georgian nationalist sources. ZLEA T\C 00:54, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 05:07, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Wikipedialuva (talk) 00:58, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 05:08, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Ixocactus (talk) 01:07, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 05:09, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs and new accounts keep making questionable-at-best additions to filmography table. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 01:31, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 05:11, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by multiple, unrelated IPs - seems to happen about this time every year!. BilCat (talk) 02:43, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 05:11, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent removal of all citations. Violations of MoS. Multiple IPs doesn't communicate. Adakiko (talk) 03:40, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 05:17, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated edit from multiple anon IPs of identical unsourced change. I have assumed wp:good will for several iterations of this but user(s) appear(s) to be unwilling to provide sources for this change despite welcome messages on their talk pages asking them to provide sources. KNHaw (talk) 04:08, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 05:18, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disrupted editing by IP users, who changes birth date for no reason despite two reliable sources needed. Links are here: [62], [63], [64] - KTerPalmers (talk) 04:30, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 05:19, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 04:38, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 05:21, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High-level vandalism going on. IP users keep vandalizing the page without visiting the talk page and ignoring the sources that support these claims. They just repeatedly change words without bringing their evidence. Ayaltimo (talk) 04:59, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 05:23, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Independent business. 36.85.39.196 (talk) 23:09, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why does this need protection? Tol (talk | contribs) @ 23:21, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done for reasons above. Daniel Case (talk) 04:29, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Consistent IP violation of 3RR standard and removal of sourced information on basis that IP believes material isn't true, despite extensive discussion and other editors reverting their edits. Assumed same IP violator that saw admin action on topics related to Syro-Malabar Church. Pbritti (talk) 03:30, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 05:16, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi admin Callanecc. You have blocked me due to my edits on Eastern Catholic Churches. Everything I wrote in that article is with reference. The official website of the Syro-Malabar Church and numerous sources say that the Syro-Malabar hierarchy was established in 1923 and not 1663. But User:Pbritti is constantly vandalising the page with an incorrect date 1663 and misleading citation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2402:8100:3905:5b17:b9f5:859c:bc89:4ad0 (talk) 06:54, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated mass-reverts of sourced info by IP Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 05:54, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A member of this band died recently and there has been frequent disruptive editing and additions of unsourced content. Bowling is life (talk) 06:39, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:55, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Spillover "owner"-type vandalism from Nashville Predators article, especially as that article is now protected. BilCat (talk) 06:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:57, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unsourced IP edits resumed following the release of K.G.F: Chapter 2. Ab207 (talk) 08:21, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 10:58, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Sort of continual edit warring from several editors to change the name post marriage, failing WP:V and WP:BLP. So far I observed the editors not to be an EC-ers, so perhaps an ECP would deter disruption for the time being? — DaxServer (t · m · c) 08:22, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 11:01, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Recently linked to on the /r/ScottTheWoz subreddit, which has caused another spate of IP vandalism. O.N.R. (talk) 09:08, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. El_C 11:03, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – This issue is the same as the previous year's article which was protected 3 times last year. Requesting semi for the rest of the year. -- EN-Jungwon 09:31, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:04, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA. Tommi1986 let's talk! 09:36, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:06, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: An anonymous user with multiple IPs keeps removing funk metal from the genre field, despite being well-sourced, and has been reverted by multiple users over the past week. This guy also tends to make personal attacks in his edit summaries. Though the article is already under pending protection from IP edits, it could use a full protection from IP edits, as most IP edits have either been rejected or reverted in recent times anyway. MoonJet (talk) 09:48, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Beyond that IP, I think the original indef pc was probably a bad idea for a page as active (but it was 2013, so pc was not that well understood back then). El_C 11:12, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi-protection - the conspiracy-mongering has returned. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 10:57, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of another year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:12, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Multiple IP editors trying to hijack the page with a non-notable individual. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 11:54, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:06, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism by what appears to be a very persistent IP user. It looks as though this user vandalized the page multiple times, then registered an account and vandalized some more until that account was indef blocked, and now its continuing to vandalize as an IP again. Semi-protection for a stretch of time should hopefully put a stop to this. Legitimus (talk) 12:15, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 12:20, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There isn't really any significant disruption in this page after that timespan in 2014 (prior to the addition of the protection). Looking at the page's history, I think that there is no need for WP:PCPP anymore, let alone an indefinite one. Engr. Smitty Werben 04:18, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: Please ask the protecting admin, Feminist (talk · contribs), before asking here. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 05:33, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am not an administrator and I have no power to protect or unprotect pages. feminist (talk) Слава Україні! 06:10, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It was Salvio giuliano who placed pending changes protection on the footballer article when it was still at K. Rajagopal. The page (and protection) was moved to K. Rajagopal (footballer) in July 2020. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:50, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Dāsānudāsa (talk) 12:27, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 108 days (until August 1), after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 12:44, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – most edits are vandalism/reverts, many of which have been revision deleted. Will120 (talk) 13:08, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done firefly ( t · c ) 13:13, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. TylerBurden (talk) 14:12, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:45, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 15:03, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by multiple IPs Tammbecktalk 14:54, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 15:06, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 15:06, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Kazamzam (talk) 15:07, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 15:12, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Kazamzam (talk) 15:09, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 15:15, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There is a on going edit war and vandalism. talk 10:40, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The only non-confirmed participant, Lovewins777, has been escorted off the premises. If there's any more edit-warring among the survivors, full-protection of The Wrong Version may be necessary. Favonian (talk) 11:06, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – for now. Favonian (talk) 12:57, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 12:50, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Way too low of activity for semi-protection at the moment, let alone indefinite. I considered pending changes, but the last edit was a few days ago and the last 50 goes back to last August, so I really can't justify pulling the trigger on that. Feel free to re-request pending changes or semi-protection if there's another burst of disruption. Ks0stm (TCGE) 13:00, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Huge amounts of vandalism by IP users, also bound to receive more as it's the 33rd anniversary of the event. Fijipedia (talk) 16:20, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 16:30, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Content is persistently blanked. ElementSix (talk) 14:01, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Partial-blocked IP for 1 month. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:32, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Insane amount of vandalism by IP Users. Fijipedia (talk) 14:58, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only one IP vandalizing this month, and they are one false step away from being blocked. Favonian (talk) 15:28, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent level of vandalism for past 2 days. It's manageable as is, but probably could benefit from some protection. Solipsism 101 (talk) 17:05, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:14, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism/block evasion. Loafiewa (talk) 16:13, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ks0stm (TCGE) 16:27, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent introduction of factual errors to the lead and Infobox in particularly on the changing of tvN to MBC, in contrast to what was sourced. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 17:24, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 18:35, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DB1729 (talk) 19:26, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | tålk 19:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant IP vandalism removing up-to-date, cited information. Anwegmann (talk) 19:45, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 20:14, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Repeatedly protected, vandalism resumes immediately after expiry. WhoAteMyButter (📨talk📝contribs) 19:46, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Acroterion. Ks0stm (TCGE) 20:16, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Giraffer (talk·contribs) 20:25, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Deepfriedokra. Ks0stm (TCGE) 20:33, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit War. Vandal keeps changing page to say she is dead. Heysickah (talk) 17:00, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:10, 15 April 2022 (UTC): User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:10, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: For the past weeks, there have been repeated attempts by IP users to add content to the article that ignores consensus (examples: 1, 2, 3). Sometimes those edits have become rather impolite (as in the edit summary here). My hope is that this can be solved by limiting the rights of IP users to edit the article. Renerpho (talk) 20:49, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protectedFavonian (talk) 20:56, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – This article on a Canadian politician has seen removal of sourced sections and addition of whitewash. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:51, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 21:01, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Multiple instances of blanking and adding unsourced content in last few hours. SpinningCeres 17:12, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:18, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:18, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Airtransat236 (let's talk) 17:13, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Still loving the extra Charlies! El_C 21:29, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I wish to kindly request for an edit to this template to publish a biography article on wikipedia. The article is not copyrighted or duplicated from any other sources and it is of high value to the wikipedia space, as it is about a growing and potent figure in the African space. Theviptalabs22 (talk) 13:36, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Theviptalabs22. What page are you referring to here? Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:16, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. No response. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:16, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

16 April 2022

Reason: 2 weeks semi-protection. High profile event, attracting IP editors posting poorly worded demanding proofs. Example. I don't want to wade through such events. Harizotoh9 (talk) 20:23, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now. Too much collateral. That IP has been blocked btw. El_C 21:24, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jibran1998 (talk) 23:57, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. Ks0stm (TCGE) 00:29, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I have been away for a couple of years and I am back but unable to edit my user page because it's semi-protected. Can some admin please unprotect it? Thanks in advance. FayssalF - Wiki up® 22:20, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's fine. I can edit it. Please disregard the above request. -- FayssalF - Wiki up® 22:48, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I removed the protection a few minutes before your reply. Your user page is protected to the same level as semi-protection by an edit filter so no harm done, I guess. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:55, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Malcolm. And nice to see you around again. Appreciated. FayssalF - Wiki up® 23:23, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:27, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP editing while logged out after user ZemenfesKidus recently blocked, same IP range was blocked from this page for editing while logged out back in February. Similar content altered by user and IP Magherbin (talk) 23:16, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:44, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations. Jibran1998 (talk) 23:45, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:41, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jibran1998 (talk) 23:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:39, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent vandalism from IP and new users ever since it has been unprotected. It was previously protected for a year. Time to consider an indefinite or a long-term protection at the very least given that it gets regularly high views and is a featured article at that. FrB.TG (talk) 01:39, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:47, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: If a page is an archive which no one should edit, why even bother allowing edits? The Silent Ones (talk) 00:10, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Ks0stm (TCGE) 00:31, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism by IPs Tomorrow and tomorrow (talk) 00:28, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ks0stm (TCGE) 00:33, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I hope I don’t have to explain this one Owent acc (talk) 00:40, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ks0stm (TCGE) 00:53, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Article appears to be the target of ongoing whitewashing attempts by IPs from San Francisco, mostly the University of California. Skywatcher68 (talk) 15:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 16:26, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Skywatcher68, I'm not sure "whitewashing" is necessarily a correct descriptor. See my dummy edit. El_C 16:33, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 06:43, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Someone is gonna try and bring back the vandalized version, I guarantee you. Owent acc (talk) 21:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 22:37, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator observation) Note: The page is already semi-protected, so that should be enough to suppress most vandals. interstatefive  (talk) - just another roadgeek 23:08, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 06:43, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism Cannolis (talk) 02:18, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator C.Fred. Favonian (talk) 06:50, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism to BLP. Egghead06 (talk) 07:04, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 08:41, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unreferenced date of birth by IPs. FDW777 (talk) 07:34, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 08:37, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This was "declined for now" recently, but the same SPA is back with a new account two new accounts, no indication that they would stop without semi-protection. mfb (talk) 07:38, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 08:26, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. -- lomrjyo 🇺🇦 02:15, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 10:59, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Long-running dispute where WP:AP2 applies, and unreliable sources are routinely being used. Dynamic ips now edit-warring. Hipal (talk) 03:17, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 11:03, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Request some assistance with a temporary page protection. A particular IP has been reverting edits and has been introducing an year of birth which is unsourced. I can not edit any more since I will be in violation of WP:3RR. The IP has revert-edited 5 times now. I request this change to be reverted and the page to temporarily protected. Copying user:Robby.is.on as an FYI. Ktin (talk) 03:37, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:06, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism. Additions of joke editts such as " crow", dollar thief etc to his name, additions of pseudo death date of living person. Dove's talk (talk) 10:24, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 10:56, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: To explore more practical pornography for observation and educational purposes Jerry12341811 (talk) 00:45, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, you're not going to get the page pregnant. Nothing you state will be accomplished by unprotecting the page CreecregofLife (talk) 00:48, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You are able to view the page - is that not sufficient for "observation and educational purposes"? Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:32, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Favonian (talk) 06:45, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because people had forgetted about this film and the protection on this page feels unecessary . 2406:3003:2077:3DC5:DDE1:859:244E:30A8 (talk) 09:05, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected. El_C 10:55, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Redirected per AfD being recreated. Should be a protected redirect as AfD results being ignored. Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:10, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 11:12, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Single-purpose dynamic IPs are continually replacing a sourced description of the incident with unsourced commentary: [65], [66], [67], [68], [69]. TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 05:17, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:14, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeatedly removal of lead section (removal of well sourced content) despite reverts by several trusted users. Dove's talk (talk) 08:07, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:21, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Frequent bad edits by IPs. Ab207 (talk) 08:44, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:22, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism again begins just after the expiration of previous protection. Dove's talk (talk) 10:57, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:24, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This BLP page of a politician is having a wave of edits(started <2 hours ago), due to what appears to be recent political happenings in Pakistan. There have been 38 recent edits by 17 different IPs.
I have found it hard to ascertain if any are constructive, but overall it appears the changes have been either unconstructive/vandalism/poor quality or have been edits reverting the previous changes.
2804:F14:C060:8A01:39ED:2019:D269:496A (talk) 12:05, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:21, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I request that the image on the "Killing of Patrick Lyoya" page be REMOVED immediately. It is disturbing and by having it included especially at the top of the wikipedia page, it fetishizes the violent murder of black people. Cheysharvey (talk) 15:07, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Cheysharvey: Wikipedia is not censored. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 22:53, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done – Please use an edit request at Talk:Killing of Patrick Lyoya to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian (talk) 08:34, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: As the concept is relevant to a number of religions, this article will be exposed to possible vandalism and differing viewpoints. StolenFocus007 (talk) 11:37, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 11:59, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Arbitration Enforcement. Not sure why this was unprotected? Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 13:08, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good point, but I'm also not going to go indef just yet. Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 13:11, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ks0stm, even though you marked it as DE rather than AE, it is the protected for one year like many (most?) of the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine pages that are AE logged. So for best recordkeeping, I'm logging the protection at WP:AEL. Hope that's okay. Regards, El_C 13:46, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@El C: Works for me, thanks! Ks0stm (TCGE) 13:50, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism and edit warring by a single-purpose banned sock immediately after the previous protection expired Snowflake91 (talk) 13:57, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 15:03, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent unsourced edits. BOVINEBOY2008 14:59, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 15:06, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I am Monica Gandhi and someone keeps on vandalizing my page. These 3 lines are not appropriate as I wrote articles changing this thinking and the Mehdi Hasan interview was completely libelous and inappropriate; there was no basis to put this interview in here when I have done 100s of interviews during COVID. This person who keeps on vandalizing the page should be stopped from editing. My institution UCSF keeps on trying to edit this page and is unable to. Please unprotect this page and allow editing by UCSF. These lines should be removed: "The literature she reviewed suggested that masks can reduce viral load by filtering the majority of particles, and that countries with mask mandates had dramatically decreased death rates.[15][17] In an interview with CBS News, Gandhi said, “How much virus you get in is probably one of the most important determinants of how sick you get ... By having a mask over your face, it filters out the majority of viral particles. So, even if you do get exposed to COVID ... you are going to get very little virus in, and if you do get COVID, you’ll get less sick.”[18]

Gandhi was criticized by Mehdi Hasan during her appearance on his MSNBC talk show in February 2022 for her predictions during the pandemic and ending restrictions early.[19]"

Thank you, Monica 2601:645:C380:43A0:ED0D:A59C:5BC8:105F (talk) 00:49, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't look like vandalism, it just seems like you're trying to remove reliably sourced and credible content you object to CreecregofLife (talk) 01:17, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined. Again, not undue to the point of being defamatory. And, any further legal threats (soft or hard) will be subject to sanctions from this point on. I actually agree (to a point) that that addition is undue, see the discussion I started at Talk:Monica_Gandhi#COVID predictions, criticism and undue weight. In any case, adjusting the protection or lifting it outright is, at this time, simply irrelevant to the matter at hand. El_C 10:54, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 15:33, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ks0stm. Favonian (talk) 15:39, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Due to the salacious nature of some of the laptop's contents, this article will always be the target of extremely graphic and BLP-violating attacks, such as this one. Therefore I request indefinite and permanent protection. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 16:05, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

American politics 2 Arbitration enforcement Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 16:20, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent attempts to add an unreferenced or improperly referenced date of birth. Latest series of the TV show she stars in has just started, increasing the problem. FDW777 (talk) 16:06, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 16:29, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:23, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 16:31, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – One or more user(s) from IPs make disruptive and vandalism edits by ignoring Wiki guidance and I can't restore the page again and again since it would lead to edit war. AntanO 17:14, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:24, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. M.Bitton (talk) 17:16, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Deepfriedokra. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:10, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism,Many users are just inserting random values in the gross section without providing any source. TuluveRai123 (talk) 17:46, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:48, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A month or two for intermittent BLPvio vandalism would be appreciated. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:24, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:31, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated removal of all citations by multiple IPs. MoS errors. Restarted immediately after PP expired. Adakiko (talk) 19:09, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Two different IPs blocked for 31 hours. BusterD (talk) 19:12, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and reverts by IPs. ZimZalaBim talk 19:40, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:48, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi-protection due to moderate level of partisan vandalism due to incoming Philippine 2022 elections as seen below: Special:Diff/1083020720 Nuwordlife0rder (talk) 16:54, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done We don't protect page pre-emptively. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:13, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Subject of an ongoing police investigation, article already vandalized. Please semi-protect for a week. bender235 (talk) 19:50, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:20, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Folf (talk) 20:05, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:21, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection - Page repeatedly wiped by IP-hopper that really doesn't like Papua New Guinea and has been blocked twice so far today. Egsan Bacon (talk) 20:18, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:23, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism resumed after protection expired. Jalen Folf (talk) 20:31, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:33, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Folf (talk) 20:51, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism by multiple IPs and new editors. Adakiko (talk) 21:04, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:09, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection BLP set to appear on TFA 22nd of April. I understand the automatic TFA protection has ceased a long while back. Perhaps I could request temporary protection leading up to and until after it appears. No expectations of getting approved, but worth a try. Thanks -- Pseud 14 (talk) 17:32, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Bbb23 (talk) 18:15, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing vandalism from multiple IPs. Wikipedialuva (talk) 22:03, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:07, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because there are no vandals on this page anymore and it has been protected for four years already. 2406:3003:2077:3DC5:B4AF:7D4:2AED:6446 (talk) 16:14, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That there are no vandals is a feature of protection. What edit do you want to make to the page? Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:20, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Three years five months. And considering the edits that led up to the protection, I think edit requests are the way to go. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:50, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian (talk) 18:20, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. Curbon7 (talk) 21:17, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A bit of a low edit rate for semi-protection to me, but Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Feel free to request an upgrade to semi if the edit rate becomes too much for pending changes. Ks0stm (TCGE) 22:19, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Of all the edits since the last round of semi-protection expired, all but three edits from IPs were vandalism by LTA-ers. Aoi (青い) (talk) 21:26, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:18, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High levels of IP vandalism. 𝕸𝖗 𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖙𝖑𝖊 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 (talk) 21:44, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 22:25, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Vandalism and addition of unsourced content to a BLP article. TornadoLGS (talk) 22:13, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 22:15, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

17 April 2022

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jibran1998 (talk) 22:43, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:06, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Addition of "Bash at the Beach" by various IP editors. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:48, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:07, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page was given pending changes protection in 2013 for BLP violations. However, Christina was shot to death in 2016... BLP doesn't apply anymore because both she and the perpetrator are dead. I also checked the page history to see if anything has happened that would warrant further protection (e.g. vandalism, edit warring, etc.) and found nothing. Helen(💬📖) 22:16, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected. El_C 23:16, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent changes of content by IP users based on unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:01, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:05, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued unsourced changes to nationality by IPs and newly created accounts after previous protection expired. Mellk (talk) 00:41, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:43, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This article downplays the oppressive regime called Israel and its continual, systematic and brutal actions towards one ethnicity and especially the children of this particular race. In this particular case there was no evidence the children stabbed and there was no trial of this. The children were attacked, this is a cert, and the surviving child was left unaided for approx. half an hour, broken and bleeding while adult Jews were yelling profanities such as "die you son of a whore". All of the above was omitted from the article and Wiki..... hasn't even added in the latest news, i.e. that the young survivor has sat in an Israeli prison for seven years and that on the 13th April the Israeli court released him. 122.104.60.197 (talk) 21:35, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. The ability to edit pages that could be reasonably construed as being related to the Arab-Israeli conflict is restricted to logged-in users with at least 500 edits and 30 days tenure as a result of an arbitration decision. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:53, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced battles to the page by an editor who, when I requested that they provide sources for their changes, responded with "I don't have to tell you jack shit!", "Fuck you!", "I'm not giving you ANYTHING, asshole!" Applodion (talk) 22:27, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please re-report if block evasion or further re-addition of challenged unsourced material occurs.
User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:35, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP users keep adding a photo with a watermark in the infobox. Ue3lman (talk) 01:17, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:15, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Subject is a popular internet meme, and keeps getting vandalized. The page has been protected before, but vandalism continued after it expired. - Poydoo can talk and edit 02:12, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:18, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism from IP addresses CT55555 (talk) 02:31, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:32, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – persistent IP vandalism, etc. wizzito | say hello! 02:36, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:18, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. wizzito | say hello! 02:56, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 03:17, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA/sockpuppet activity. wizzito | say hello! 03:10, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 03:16, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA/sockpuppet activity. wizzito | say hello! 03:10, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 03:16, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Potential for politically-motivated vandalism Mattsnod1993 (talk) 01:24, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Ks0stm (TCGE) 01:46, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I see that now in the guidelines. Thank you, will keep that in mind for the future Mattsnod1993 (talk) 02:03, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP users have repeatedly tried to vandalize the page, even trying to offend patrolling editors. agucova (talk) 04:36, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 06:50, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 05:09, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 06:53, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring, dynamic IP. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 05:25, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's most definitely this LTA. --*Fehufangą✉ Talk page 05:30, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already done by administrator EvergreenFir. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 06:56, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 06:57, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 03:15, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:09, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent disruptive editing; large amounts of edits need reverting. wizzito | say hello! 03:15, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 09:10, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent disruptive date changes. wizzito | say hello! 03:21, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:11, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent Vandalism. OnlyFixingProse (talk) 05:07, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Correction : Disruptive editing. IP-hopping user keeps trying to remove content. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 05:41, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The Kraken needs more police cruisers! El_C 09:21, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism KingUther (talk) 07:00, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:26, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. LTA playground. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 08:44, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, bad bot! Erm: Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nate Speed broken caps lock, you know how it goes... El_C 09:30, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism.

IP user that disrupt the page, even tho I left the talk page. Cornerstone2.0 (talk) 09:01, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cornerstone2.0, looks like you've given up on using edit summaries after Nov 2021. I know it might seem repetitive, but edit summaries help outside reviewers. This page, in general, has a surprisingly low rate and quality of edit summaries for some reason. El_C 09:34, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Lado85 (talk) 09:15, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:36, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I think this page should protected because of many inaccurate information is being added by some IP users and some registered user. They are replacing the budget of the movie which is already sourced with a reliable source. Ssvlogs369 (talk) 09:19, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:37, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – DE continues. wizzito | say hello! 03:35, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The rate remains fairly low compared to that preceding the last protection (Jan-Feb). Might be premature to set pc in case it picks up again (not too much correction lag in any case). El_C 09:15, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The majority of activities for months are either vandalism or point-of-view pushing from IP addresses. I assume this might continue indefinitely, but as it's usually from IP addresses any protection would be helpful, the longer the better. CT55555 (talk) 10:09, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:16, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Leschnei (talk) 11:27, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done firefly ( t · c ) 11:32, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism by registered and unregistered users. Dearleader (talk) 03:37, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 09:16, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Removal of sourced descriptions without explanation. About Adhi'adeye and Yagori. Freetrashbox (talk) 04:24, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 09:17, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Quite numerous vandalism today and in past couple of days ago. So, requested for protection at least 2 months. Fade258 (talk) 06:17, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. For the bot. El_C 09:24, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent sock puppetry 36.85.36.66 (talk) 07:45, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Page has not been edited this month. El_C 09:27, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The same edits pop up again from a diff IP, there have been a number of disruptive editing patterns on the article, which has been going on a while in a heavily edited article, this need perm semi. Govvy (talk) 08:46, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No history of protection, so definitely not going indefinite, but Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 12:19, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: I think this page should protected because of many inaccurate information is being added by some IP users and some registered user. They are replacing the budget of the movie which is already sourced with a reliable source. Ssvlogs369 (talk) 09:46, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 12:23, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Add protect icon in Big B page Ssvlogs369 (talk) 12:51, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ssvlogs369: I already did. Ks0stm (TCGE) 13:05, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Got it. Thank you Ssvlogs369 (talk) 13:24, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: MOS:TERRORIST violations on WP:TROUBLES article by IP./new account FDW777 (talk) 12:14, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 12:31, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Resumption of same vandalism of page after short period of protection expired; picture of comic actor Norman Wisdom again being inappropriately entered into infobox for actor William Simons. Domhnallbeag (talk) 12:18, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 12:33, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP keeps editing stats. I left edit summaries and a hidden note in the code that they ignore that it's only league stats. 5 IP edits in last 4 days. I requested a couple days ago, was told not enough, but is still continuing. RedPatch (talk) 13:15, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:26, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of fake information from an IP user, which has been going on for 4 months. TheHotwiki (talk) 13:46, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:52, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I think this page should protected because of many inaccurate information is being added by some IP users and some registered user. Ssvlogs369 (talk) 13:57, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:07, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit warring by anonymous IP, who has ignored a request to stop. Edits go against a consensus reached in the talk page. Richard75 (talk) 14:05, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:16, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. as regular admin action. Feel free to lessen if onerous. Might need longer under WP:ARBEE] or WP:ARBBLP --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:16, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

please allow to edit this page as it has some wtong information. LieHunterOfWorld (talk) 05:44, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. You haven’t identified the page nor specified the change that you want to make. I suggest you make an edit request on the article talk page. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:01, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I think this page should protected because of many inaccurate information is being added by some IP users and some registered user. He is one of the greatest actor in indian cinema has ever seen. Ssvlogs369 (talk) 10:41, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ks0stm (TCGE) 12:25, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of unsourced or poorly sourced contentious accusations of atrocities supposedly carried out by Lightoller. Blake Gripling (talk) 16:22, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:13, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Sports ref seems to have pissed off multiple IP editors. Schazjmd (talk) 16:25, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Soccer-related stuff. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:43, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of long lasting disruptive editing and vandalism. Permanent semi-protection needed. Arbitration enforcement: WP:ARBMAC. Jingiby (talk) 18:17, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Arbitration enforcement: WP:ARBMAC. [ --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:16, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of fake information from an IP user. Ssvlogs369 (talk) 14:30, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 18:28, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I think this page should protected because of many inaccurate information is being added by some IP users and some registered user. Ssvlogs369 (talk) 14:48, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 18:28, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I think this page should protected because of many inaccurate information is being added by some IP users and some registered user. Ssvlogs369 (talk) 15:14, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 18:29, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Hello there, need your assistance here. An IP editor is adding unreferenced date / year of birth and I have been requesting for sources but have not been getting them. The IP editor (though from a neighboring IP block) was doing the same action on Chibuzor Nwakanma and Tadao Takahashi earlier. I am copying user:Robby.is.on as an FYI. Greatly appreciate temporary page protection on this article or alternately an action against the IP block. I will very soon run afoul of WP:3RR and hence I might not be able to act. Thanks. Ktin (talk) 17:40, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for now, but I left the IP a final warning and will block them or protect the page if it happens again. Ks0stm (TCGE) 17:44, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ks0stm: Sounds good. Thanks much. Have a nice rest of your day. Ktin (talk) 17:50, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive redirect overwriting against opposition, even when the user is logged out. Jalen Folf (talk) 18:29, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:22, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I think this page should protected because of many inaccurate information is being added by some IP users and some registered user. They are replacing the budget of the movie which is already sourced with a reliable source. Ssvlogs369 (talk) 11:55, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Protect this one Deepfriedokra Ssvlogs369 (talk) 14:49, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ssvlogs369: Please remember to use "please" and "thank you". Thanks. Deferring for a second look. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:14, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Ssvlogs369 (talk) 15:17, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please Protect Hridayam Page. Thank you Ssvlogs369 (talk) 15:19, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined. Not enough activity and the request comes from a sock. Bbb23 (talk) 18:42, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I think this page should protected because of many inaccurate information is being added by some IP users and some registered user. Ssvlogs369 (talk) 14:18, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Meh. Not sure that's enough for SP. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:22, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
How to approve this semi-protected ? Ssvlogs369 (talk) 14:25, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well, there's not enough disruptive activity IMO, but if another admin thinks it is warranted, they can. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:28, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:58, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unsourced changes to stats Hunterb212 (talk) 18:14, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 18:44, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. PaulieGlot (talk) 19:01, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:25, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 19:34, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:11, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and revdels. Qzd (talk) 22:27, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 22:32, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

18 April 2022

Semi protection: High-risk template – Also protect these templates for the same reason

Note: Dr Salvus, these additional pages are unlinked! El_C 09:22, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@El C:  Done. Have linked. Dr Salvus 09:45, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@El C:
Ink, a link a link, a link a link, a link a doo
Oh what a tune for croonin'
Ink a link a link, a link a link, a link a doo
It's got the whole world swoonin'
a dink a doo --Jimmy Durante --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:45, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I will help, but first... El_C 17:02, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined. Not an WP:HRT. Transclusion count averages 5. El_C 19:57, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Favorite target of an IP-hopping LTA going back to 2019. Article was heavily vandalized within hours of the previous 1-month semi-protection expiring. The vandal also routinely attacks the talk page as well. Sable232 (talk) 19:57, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:35, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:35, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA vandalism. They say they intend to continue. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 23:02, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 23:06, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Bbb23: Special:Contributions/107.77.206.174 is in the mix now. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 00:37, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also Special:Contributions/107.77.208.108. WP:LTA/GRP tends to do a fair bit of IP hopping. Are you sure I can't convince you to protect the page? It's dab page with little need for frequent maintenance. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 00:59, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That was getting excessive. Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 01:03, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – WP:BALKANS. Months of back-and-forth disruption. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 23:39, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:14, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant Addition of unsourced content by solarson919. AuthenticSources2546 (talk) 14:25, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please protect the Bakshi Jagabandhu page as the user solarson919 has been removing reliable sources cited on the page and is inserting unsourced information into the page for caste glorification,such activities distort history and provide false information to our fellow wiki readers.( AuthenticSources2546 (talk) 14:52, 17 April 2022 (UTC) )[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:29, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Wot 331dot said on OP's talk. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:29, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@AuthenticSources2546:Please do not characterize edits you disagree with as vandalism. Please WP:AGF --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:34, 17 April 2022 (UTC).[reply]
I'm not disagreeing with anyone the problem is solarson919 has added unsourced content in the page again and again,he added information that is not present in the sources cited in that article which i believe is completely wrong.( AuthenticSources2546 (talk) 14:43, 17 April 2022 (UTC) )[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:21, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page has been the subject of multiple trivial/unsourced edits by IPs; before then a sockfarm, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Scooterlife. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:06, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:54, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This has an interesting page history. Seems to draw a lot of activity. Virtually everyone who has edited this article until recently seems a single purpose account or is currently blocked for sock puppetry, including the editor responsible for the last four edits (a blocked sock trying vainly to apply a protection lock template). This is always a bad sign on a BLP or a CORP and resembles some sort of long-term coordination. Makes me wonder about the integrity of the BLP pagespace, which possesses some citation but seems puffy. I appreciate the reporting by both editors trying to help. BusterD (talk) 02:59, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This is the talk page of a jawp's user. As with User talk:Nnh and User talk:さかおり, it's been subject to persistent vandalism. For this reason, I request semi-protection of the page for some duration. Dragoniez (talk) 02:44, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:56, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism Bgsu98 (talk) 03:35, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 03:47, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent disruptive editing, IP users repeatedly adding non-notable entries to list of alumni. Noahfgodard (talk) 04:57, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:33, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Untill the dispute between Extended confirmed users is sorted out, this page should be protected as frequent changes in the page by different editors having different viewpoints is making it difficult to track. It is therefore possible that some useful content may be deleted in this edit war. Heba Aisha (talk) 06:19, 18 April 2022 (UTC).[reply]

No, bot, I was here third!!!1 Erm: Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:37, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism Abdulisthatyou (talk) 07:06, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator BusterD. Season 42, what? El_C 09:38, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent Disruption & Vandalism by various IPs in recent history since April. Shadowwarrior8 (talk) 07:22, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Over-correction! El_C 09:40, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent WP:NOTFORUM problem is continuing. wizzito | say hello! 07:35, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Poor robot. :( El_C 09:45, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA disruption on one of my personal userpages. wizzito | say hello! 07:35, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 09:46, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – perennial problem continuing right off last protection. wizzito | say hello! 07:43, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ponies! El_C 09:48, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandlaism problem over last few days. wizzito | say hello! 07:46, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:50, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – After the previous protection expired, the vandalism from IPs and new accounts resumed. Please protect for a bit longer this time. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:02, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 09:53, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA target. wizzito | say hello! 08:08, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:55, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP Vandalism Drtsgh (talk) 08:17, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:57, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism problem. wizzito | say hello! 08:26, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:01, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism problem. wizzito | say hello! 08:29, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:03, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – vandalism problem. wizzito | say hello! 08:30, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:05, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – DE problem continues. wizzito | say hello! 08:34, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:07, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism problem. wizzito | say hello! 08:39, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:10, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Hi, seems an WP:SPA editor has arrived today and is making strange changes. Please rollback and lock. Thanks!. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 09:15, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged GS action. El_C 10:12, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – BLP vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 10:05, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:14, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – vandalism problem. wizzito | say hello! 08:19, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 09:58, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism by IP since the April 14th. Pierre cb (talk) 12:19, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 13:06, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stephon Gilmore signed a 2 year deal worth 23 million 14 million guaranteed with the Colts he is not a free agent he is an Indianapolis Colt 71.198.118.211 (talk) 16:31, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please bring this up - with sources - on the article talk page. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:40, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done – Please use an edit request at Talk:Stephon Gilmore to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian (talk) 10:02, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Biography of the manager of Scottish football club Celtic F.C.. Because of the historically intense rivalry of the so-called Old Firm, we have persistent incidents of vandalism, e.g. this, this, this, this, this, etc. I request a page protection for some 30 days. The Gnome (talk) 10:25, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:08, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent editing by an IP hopper against consensus, we need a semi0protection (please keep pending changes in place, this seems to be a long-term problem). Ymblanter (talk) 12:14, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ks0stm (TCGE) 13:15, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 13:15, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – The page is constantly affected by removal of content by some IP. Kindly protect it temporarily. signed, 511KeV (talk) 12:14, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 13:09, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Several cases of vandalism over the past few weeks Toofllab (talk) 13:09, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 13:11, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent LTA problem. wizzito | say hello! 13:36, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:47, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:48, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing Xcelltrasi (talk) 13:44, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:48, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism problem. wizzito | say hello! 15:14, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 15:18, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constantly the subject of pov-pushing by overenthusiastic IPs/new users. This has been ongoing for many years now. HistoryofIran (talk) 15:43, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:52, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism by a couple of newly registered accounts and several IP users. Hey man im josh (talk) 11:35, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:10, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:10, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Potential Vandalism risk in the future Sparshgup (talk) 11:39, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. Ks0stm (TCGE) 13:19, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Slow but persistent vandalism by mostly anon editors. Lithopsian (talk) 16:33, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:38, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent LTA problem. wizzito | say hello! 13:37, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:46, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:48, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism since his death. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:43, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:05, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:45, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:35, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent insertion of near-nonsense by IPs. MrOllie (talk) 16:50, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:37, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP POV insertion, and edit warring. Khestwol (talk) 11:51, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:34, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit warring. I tried to put a template to discuss the merge and the content, to find consensus by puting both charts, but the other user is POV-pushing saying "it has been here for years", which is false. Same for List of universities and higher education institutions in the Paris region Ransouk (talk) 16:31, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:36, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:37, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The main talk page for this article has been protected from editing by new/unregistered accounts. Please fully-protect ALL the talk page archive pages - Talk:Project Veritas/Archive 1, Talk:Project Veritas/Archive 2, Talk:Project Veritas/Archive 3, Talk:Project Veritas/Archive 4, and Talk:Project Veritas/Archive 5 - as there has been a slow-burning spate of unregistered/new accounts recently posting new content to the archived talk pages. The archived pages should be protected at least until when the September 2022 end date of the main talk page's editing protection expires. Shearonink (talk) 18:27, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weird.
Done
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:40, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Two users, probably the same user because the edits are the same, are removing content with source and putting "most prestigious" in the lead even though the sources rather say "top". Like last time, they remove sources without using talk page, and they will probably say that they provide "many" even though the diffs show removing the sources. Ransouk (talk) 10:56, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A diff: [70] --Ransouk (talk) 11:27, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, both users are confirmed, meaning the content dispute must be solved at the talk page.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:51, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ymblanter: the other user user (please look at the diff) is not confirmed. --Ransouk (talk) 15:47, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: In a content dispute, admins are forbidden from showing favoritism toward autoconfirmed users. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:57, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
(Not this again!) That user is autoconfirmed, in any case. See WP:CONFIRM: user accounts that are at least 4 days old and have made at least 10 edits. El_C 17:21, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:39, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 16:38, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Hopefully, they will now discuss. I much prefer to partial block edit warriors and leave the artice available for everyone else. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:59, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined for now; this seems to have been resolved ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:36, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:39, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruption throughout April by several accounts. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 19:33, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – - Page have rapidly gained interest recently, pageview chart growing exponentially (combined with page view count of previous article name), and there are now some different IP users trying to make back and forth edits on some word choices in the article. C933103 (talk) 19:40, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:39, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term vandalism target, and will probably always be. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 20:57, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:00, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

19 April 2022

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There are some users that keep removing his loan to Turris from the Infobox, despite the existance of a reference in the article that literally says his loan was cancelled the same day he was unveiled. You can’t cancel something that doesn’t exist. 8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 14:55, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:48, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Sorry, no. I see two edit warriors who are extended confirmed. The best I can offer is partial blocks and WP:DR --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:42, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:09, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated unsourced/COI edits from IP who is almost certainly the blocked user Loganproductions. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:07, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:30, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Please ping me if it starts up again. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:30, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:09, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Most of the IP edits over the past two years or so have been removing seemingly-random, large chunks of the article content without any explanation. WCQuidditch 16:16, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:23, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This is why gave us the miracle of the partial block and the miracle of the range block --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:23, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:10, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IPs and new users. Johnj1995 (talk) 21:43, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:33, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandal sock has resumed after the previous protection ended. Lord Belbury (talk) 18:49, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. User blocked, other mitigation means deployed. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:02, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent POV pushing. ZLEA T\C 23:11, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:46, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism/unsourced POV pushing etc AndyTheGrump (talk) 02:14, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 03:07, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Requesting temporary page protection since the same IP editor has been introducing unreferenced year of birth into the article. The same behavior was seen by the editor on multiple pages including Baidyanath Chakrabarty, Chibuzor Nwakanma, and Tadao Takahashi among others. I am adding admin user:Ks0stm since they have context from prior. I will be running afowl of WP:3RR and hence need this assistance. Ktin (talk) 03:16, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:31, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Large amounts of vandalism from different IPs due to recent mask mandate order. Wikipedialuva (talk) 03:27, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:33, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This is weird. The article is unprotected but not the talk page? 182.1.74.56 (talk) 23:54, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The talk page specifically was protected three weeks ago due to vandalism/role-playing. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 23:58, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined: No actual reason for unprotection given ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:57, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism since March 22, 2022. Cassiopeia talk 00:11, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 09:07, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – constant unsourced changes target. wizzito | say hello! 01:14, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 09:08, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of WP:LTA/TFD. wizzito | say hello! 06:20, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 09:10, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:LTA/TFD target; other DE happens as well. wizzito | say hello! 06:21, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 09:11, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Mellk (talk) 07:52, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 09:06, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dr Salvus 08:04, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 09:05, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A very high level of IP vandalism that I absolutely cannot keep up with. It’s occurred four times now in the last twelve hours that some IP has insisted on changing the page to say that all of Buffalo Bill’s victims were obese, which is patently false. I can’t imagine why someone would do this. Maybe it’s the same person/people who were vandalizing the Will Graham page recently—that page was protected, so they came to this one instead. VictimOfEntropy (talk) 08:14, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 09:03, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism/DE target. wizzito | say hello! 06:23, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 09:15, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism BlameRuiner (talk) 07:08, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 09:14, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Adding of honorifics against WP:NCINDIC. As before, started again literally the day the page was unprotected. Can we please look at indefinite protection here, as the IP is not getting the message or just doesn't care, and I'm running out of patience to have to keep manually reverting. Dāsānudāsa (talk) 09:58, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:37, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Adding of honorifics against WP:NCINDIC. As before, started again literally the day the page was unprotected. Can we please look at indefinite protection here, as the IP is not getting the message or just doesn't care, and I'm running out of patience to have to keep manually reverting. Dāsānudāsa (talk) 09:58, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:40, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:LTA/TFD target. wizzito | say hello! 06:37, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. BusterD (talk) 09:17, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:LTA/TFD target. wizzito | say hello! 06:37, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. BusterD (talk) 09:18, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:18, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Again, vandalism after the expiry of the last protection. TrangaBellam (talk) 07:33, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Looks to be a single user who is autoconfirmed so semi protection won't be effective. Warn the user appropriately and report them if the editing continues. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 09:19, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruption by IP hopper (has used 181.115.64.81, 181.115.64.30 and 181.115.6.97 in the last few days). As the (hopefully) corect version shows, the article is about flags of counties, states and suchlike, The IP's most recent version is basically to remove almost all those, and replace it with a duplicate of Gallery of sovereign state flags. FDW777 (talk) 07:49, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 09:11, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-Protection: Persistent vandalism and Disruptive edits by various IPs since April 1, 2022 as shown in history. Shadowwarrior8 talk 08:43, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 09:02, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant IP vandalism. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 09:08, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 09:22, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Destruptive edits – Too much destruption. Some IPs insist with an edit request which has been declined so many times. Dr Salvus 23:22, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Perhaps, but the IPs might not be the same person, and so might not be aware that the same request was declined so many times already. Lectonar (talk) 07:30, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Lectonar another vandal guy has vandalised the page. Dr Salvus 09:51, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Dr Salvus: Would you be so kind and point out the vandalism that occurred? While the post was forum-like (and has been reverted in the meantime), I can see no vandalism. Lectonar (talk) 10:27, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Lectonar Ok, that wasn't vandalism. But can't it be protected for WP:DE? Dr Salvus 10:28, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant disruptive editing (changing Russian to Ukrainian). Wretchskull (alt) (talk) 09:37, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 09:45, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Persistent recent WP:BLP violations – repeated addition of an unsourced WP:DOB. --IJBall (contribstalk) 13:03, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:26, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unconstructive edits. TheHotwiki (talk) 13:25, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:29, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Rapid pace of IP edits disregarding that current officeholder, GEN MM Naravane is still in office, and that incoming COAS, LTG Manoj Pande is taking office on 30 April 2022. Likely in response to this story. Two reversions to intents to correct have been made within 2-3 minutes of such corrections. If possible, protection should last until 30 April, when Pande takes office. SuperWIKI (talk) 14:52, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:13, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Protection is not beneficial as page requires numerous updates and editors have failed to respond to update requests. This page is so out of date that it doesn't even mention that he's currently running for office. 74.93.197.34 (talk) 23:10, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This was protected as Arbitration enforcement, and cannot be unprotected by fiat here. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 00:01, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined. Absolutely not. This protection will not be lowered for the foreseeable future. If you wish to introduce proposals or updates or whatever for people to review, draft better requests ([71]). The limitations of WP:VOLUNTARY are not to be offset by risking imminent WP:BLP vios, certainly to the point WP:LIBEL. The article talk page alone remains perilous ([72][73]). El_C 12:53, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The crazed vandal Azul411 seems to have gone. See the sock-puppet investigation on Azul411. 2A00:23C4:7C8E:1600:D57B:73FC:BFC9:1BC2 (talk) 09:05, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Protected for one year, expires in one month, so what's the rush? El_C 12:58, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism after unprotection due to a recent story of hers: https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/04/19/libs-of-tiktok-right-wing-media/. Endwise (talk) 11:41, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:15, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: ping me when it restarts. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:15, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 19:48, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Pro-Musk reddit community attempts to remove any negative remarks regarding said article. https://www.reddit.com/r/elonmusk/comments/u69f22/elon_musks_wikipedia_page_is_seriously_biased/ CharlesViBritannia (talk) 12:56, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. That may be so, but most of the disputes are happening between extended confirmed users, so I'm wary of upgrading to WP:ECP just yet. The only other viable option would therefore be to fully protect, but I don't think that is called for yet, either. El_C 13:33, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP repeatedly vandalizes the article. ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk) 17:36, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has repeatedly been vandalised by multiple IPs, and thus I feel it would be appropriate to semi-protect this page for the time being. HenryTemplo (talk) 16:01, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:15, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:15, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Continued addition of unsourced claims. - FlightTime (open channel) 18:22, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of X, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:03, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qzd (talk) 18:47, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:05, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism Storchy (talk) 16:12, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:19, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:19, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qzd (talk) 18:38, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 20:13, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism from multiple IPs. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 19:39, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 20:10, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Severestorm28 19:39, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 19:43, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism as well as disruptive edits by newly created accounts. Requesting protection against edits by users who are not at least extended confirmed. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:40, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ks0stm. Favonian (talk) 20:03, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qzd (talk) 20:54, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:04, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is why God gave us the miracle of the /64 rangeblock. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:05, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:15, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:15, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing by anonymous editors. livelikemusic (TALK!) 14:42, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:23, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Too many Users are engaging in Edit war after adding reliable newspaper source called Times Of India, i think it is worth considerable to further add a layer of protection to this page, thank you. Sai Raghavendra Puranam (talk) 16:52, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:18, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP keeps vandalizing the article. ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk) 17:32, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:52, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

20 April 2022

Reason: Frequent vandalism Noahfgodard (talk) 19:26, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Favonian (talk) 20:07, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Party flag was changed by IP without explanation or sources. Potentially, they may come again and replace it again. Khestwol (talk) 19:27, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:46, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – I would, but I WP:INVOLVED myself. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:41, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:20, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This article and Battle of Benadir are bizarre. Both detail an obscure raid the Portuguese conducted against a Somalian city in the 16th century, and both have been persistently vandalized and protected on and off for years. They've been given several semi-protections, with the last one being an Extended Confirmed Protection, but vandalism continued as soon as protection wore off even despite multiple bans to many sock-puppet accounts, by the looks of it all belonging to the same obsessive Somalian nationalist. Since everything has failed despite our best efforts I now strongly request that an Indefinite Extended Confirmed Protection please be applied to both pages, because I've been cleaning them almost single-handedly for several years already, and that's getting old. Wareno (talk) 22:45, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It appears the socks/vandals are getting blocked promptly when they appear, and that may be the best way to deal with this situation, since the vandalism edits are not frequent enough to justify protection. Applies to both articles mentioned. MelanieN (talk) 01:27, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – About seven reverts, multiple editors, in three days on same content. —MelbourneStartalk 03:34, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Why do I not see any attempt at discussing the question on the talk page?-- MelanieN (talk) 03:58, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: It seems that full protection on this is a bit of overkill, especially when the user who was vandalizing the page leading to the protection has 12 edits and has been inactive for 2.5 years. The protection level has also caused an issue with RfDs about the page due to the inability to edit the page to add a template. TartarTorte 02:14, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@El C: Protecting admin. Lectonar (talk) 07:27, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected. Sorry, I don't know what happened there. That redirect should have been protected at WP:ECP level, not full. Sorry again. El_C 09:23, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: Page used by Ultraviolet to load the preferences menu (similar to WP:Twinkle/Preferences) - issues may occur if someone vandalised this. Remagoxer (talk) 17:14, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The worst thing one could do to this page, I guess, is replacing it by a redirect, making the settings page inaccessible. I can't think of any other way to cause noticeable disruption. Pages are usually not protected preemptively, but perhaps an administrator will protect it as a "highly visible page". Which it isn't at the moment, if I understand correctly... But I'll leave this open. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:25, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. No disruption yet, can be protected if and when disruption occurs. Lectonar (talk) 06:53, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP hopping vandalism. Won't stick to discussing, but edit wars. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 21:44, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hm. Valjean, while WP:ONUS and WP:BURDEN are part of the verifiability policy, WP:BRD is just an essay. The user is discussing with you on the article's talk page. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:34, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, but edit warring is against policy, and a violation of BRD is nearly always the first step in edit warring. It is often cited as evidence of edit warring, and, AFAIK, is a often clear proof of who started the edit warring. Let's hope they'll stick to discussion now. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 00:11, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:26, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism. Gharouni Talk 08:33, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:09, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Dealer07. See the page history for recent edit warring. Binksternet (talk) 06:57, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User vandalising page and keeping going against MOS:OVERLINK rule by reverting the ethnicity link in the lead and removing people's links in the main body. Suspicious3 (talk) 06:59, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 08:21, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Xx misery (talk) 09:16, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:42, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is suffering from British and Singaporean company edit-warring. Protection was removed 4 days ago and seems to going to persist again. A note to Cullen328, the original administrator protecting the page, was given on talkpage also. Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 10:11, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:44, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent rash of what appear to be COI edits by SPA accounts which turn out to be largely promotional and unsourced additions/subtractions. Chaos ensues and protection may help calm things down a bit. Geoff | Who, me? 18:37, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The result of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xuguo163 may become helpful to decide whether blocking or protection are needed. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:44, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 08:22, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This page has seen a lot of vandalism by IP users and users who have just registered. In the most recent edit I fixed them all. I don't think non-autoconfirmed users should be editing this page, and I believe most of them just got to that page by following the link. 0xDeadbeef (talk) 04:02, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:08, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason constant disruption by some IPs ( to push their own pov ) without using talk page of the article. RS6784 (talk) 09:02, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:11, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Significant numbers of non-constructive IP posts above AfD templates. Please semi until AfD is done, any constructive posts on the talk page can be moved over. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:18, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Deepfriedokra. Ks0stm (TCGE) 12:30, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Binksternet (talk) 09:07, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:39, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Wave of vandalism by 4 accounts and 1 IP. 2804:F14:C060:8A01:5119:D5BB:8FB0:EE7F (talk) 10:42, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:48, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP edits claiming death of living person without sources, all from the same range Storchy (talk) 10:43, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:49, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism in facts and information. Someone adding bad words to the page with malicious intention. Please protect this page. 212.104.236.173 (talk) 11:44, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:57, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continued vandalism, disruptive editings and edit warring. နေနီဝန်း (talk) 12:04, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only one set of three edits by an IP in the last month. Ks0stm (TCGE) 12:37, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: To avoid edit wars and to protect the integrity of the page, It must be made sure that only verified and logged-in people should edit the page which
avoids the case of page vandalization so that the information is secured of the page.
NameIsShaheer (talk) 12:17, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ks0stm (TCGE) 12:34, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – newbie edit warring. Roxy the grumpy dog. wooF 12:40, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Not enough recent activity. If user continues to edit-war, report to WP:ANEW. Bbb23 (talk) 13:43, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Criminal conviction in personal life section is constantly being removed. The news story is true and correctly sourced. It has been removed five times since last September and as recently as today. Thegeordieman (talk) 12:42, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:44, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:05, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Multiple anon. BLP violations, due to him being the son of the Sri Lankan PM. Page was also protected earlier this month for ten days. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 16:43, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:22, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hajrakhala (talk) 17:03, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Purportedly, subject's representative wants the page taken down per legal jibber jabber. Left them a note to contact the Foundation. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:30, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 17:31, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism while tfa. – robertsky (talk) 17:37, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:41, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Volten001 14:48, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:59, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:03, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of BLP violating vandalism. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 14:58, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:04, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:06, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Maria Gemmi (talk) 15:02, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:11, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:11, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple nonsense posts by Russia-originated IP posters. Omgwtfbbqsomethingrandom (talk) 15:32, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:18, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of IP vandalism. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 18:20, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:33, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content and disruptive editing after reports of a player seeking a trade. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:22, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:17, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: A user with a dynamic IP persistently trying to change the preferred name of the river. – Uanfala (talk) 19:18, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:20, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Or a range block. The page is vandalized practically every day by a user from that range. (CC) Tbhotch 15:17, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Minor Vandalism, linked on an altright forum Carpathianflorist (talk) 16:25, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:14, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:14, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because people should be given access to edit 103.200.75.132 (talk) 17:00, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian (talk) 17:25, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

21 April 2022

Reason: The page is currently fully protect with protection (I think) due to expire today. Since protection was imposed due to edit warring, an RFC has been opened, but the creator of that RFC is currently showing the same poor behaviour (personal attacks and not assuming good faith) thus I have little confidence he/she is going to play by the rules. I don't think the RFC will conclude amicably any time soon so I would suggest leaving the article protected for longer. In the meantime any admin who wants to swing by the RFC and steer things back in the right direction would be very welcome. 10mmsocket (talk) 17:38, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:42, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@10mmsocket: i'd sooner block individual edit warriors then make the page inaccessible to everyone else. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:46, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. We rarely if ever protect pages from just one or two editors behaving disruptively. -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:51, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you both. That give me a better understanding. 10mmsocket (talk) 20:48, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Followers of Rabbi Miller appear to be uncomfortable with the newly added, well cited information and are attempting to remove it wholesale. DemocraticLuntz (talk) 20:58, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:34, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Following the departure of multiple User:SPWTulsaOK1213 socks after their attempts to add unsourced information, including an exact date of birth, e.g. [74], [75], [76], as well as various attempts by IPs to add an unsourced exact date of birth, e.g. [77], there have been two attempts today by IPs to add unsourced exact dates of birth and other disruptive edits. Beccaynr (talk) 21:17, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:34, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Leschnei (talk) 23:19, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:36, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: the problem has been fixed Copyrightsupport (talk) 17:42, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What problem? CreecregofLife (talk) 17:44, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Looks like the OP and assorted IPs are the problem. Favonian (talk) 18:04, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"I have shared the content, problem solved" is so weird. CreecregofLife (talk) 18:55, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:54, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:19, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent block evasion. BilCat (talk) 20:18, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:20, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Multiple edits of vandalism on a controversial article that introduced false information different than what is provided in the source. See this edit regarding vandalism. WMrapids (talk) 20:52, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:23, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of IP vandalism. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 22:33, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Leave me bot, I was here 5th! Erm: Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Family wins again, this time in space (X). El_C 04:28, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent contestant reveal of Rudy Guliani is leading to BLP-type vandalism on the page. Masem (t) 03:58, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:32, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Violations of WP:BLP and vandalism by IP editors, presumably due to recent action against Jacob by the FAA. M16A3NoRecoilHax (talk) 06:55, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:26, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit-warring by IP repeatedly attempting strange and unexplained edit, reverted by several experienced users. RolandR (talk) 07:53, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:28, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of improperly cited, non-notable material; no engagement at talk page. Mutt Lunker (talk) 08:23, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:31, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism and unconstructive edits. Article has Pending Changes protection already but disruption continues. — Manticore 09:49, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:21, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mellk (talk) 10:21, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:23, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Name of the article attracts a massive amount of vandalism from non-account editors; page should be permanently semi-protected from vandals. Hussierhussier1 (talk) 05:47, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Much to my surprise there is actually no massive amount of vandalism... last disruptive edit almost 1 month ago. Lectonar (talk) 08:28, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism OutbackMinecrafter (talk) 05:48, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:30, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Obvious target for vandalism, no need to edit the page as it's just a redirect. OutbackMinecrafter (talk) 06:00, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No need to edit it, but disruption not big enough to warrant protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:31, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Large amount of vandalism from ip editors. Greyjoy talk 11:31, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:33, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I want to prevent IPs from editing my talk page because I don't know them and some IPs are fake. I am Rjsb0192 (talk) 10:06, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Please read this. There was no disruption yet, and IP editors can be as fake or true as editors with accounts. Lectonar (talk) 10:38, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive edits by IP users all of a sudden over the past day or so. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:06, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:35, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – The putting of unverified image by another user has warranted full protection as the another editor is not aware of WP: MOSIMAGE, ,WP:ONUS and other rules. They are just acting as WP: STONEWALL to put image generated by themself without providing verification that it is of koeri people only. Heba Aisha (talk) 13:11, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator RegentsPark. Favonian (talk) 15:21, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruption doesn't seem to desist. Endwise (talk) 15:42, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Aidan9382 (talk) 16:04, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 15:47, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 18:39, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant Vandalism Carpathianflorist (talk) 16:50, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of now until August 1, 2022, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 18:44, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Im not sure why protection was established here, but i dont see a reason why, as its not this heavily protected for any other stub templates that im seeing, and its not like its in heavy use or high risk. (Noticed from Category:Templates needing documentation pages) Aidan9382 (talk) 15:15, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotectedxaosflux Talk 15:59, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – The reason is simple. The user generated image is not Verifiable in this case. The image is also violation of privacy policy of the individuals which are identifiable and their consent is not taken. It is nominated as of now for delition on the Commons on same ground. The edit and revert is getting ugly on some pages. Please protect it for some time to keep the content protected. Heba Aisha (talk) 13:42, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If dispute is resolved prior to that, ping me. Jayron32 20:00, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Still being vandalized after being unprotected. Please protect until after May 9. Howard the Duck (talk) 18:12, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 18:59, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The problems which seemed to have existed earlier have been removed.A more critical and balanced tome has been achieved. 2A00:23C4:1394:9C00:61A2:EFF1:5AA:BEB0 (talk) 15:50, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Such page has never existed, not even with the parentheses such article would properly have CreecregofLife (talk) 15:52, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I went ahead and fixed it on their behalf based off of the block in their contributions and the fact that page was the only one on the disambiguation list specifically mentioning "historian". Aidan9382 (talk) 15:53, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ah. Good catch. They’ve been at it for over two years, so it’s safe to say this request is not in good faith CreecregofLife (talk) 15:56, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Favonian (talk) 16:04, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Arbitration Enforcement. Requesting WP:GS/SASG enforcement, persistent socking with unsourced content, some of whom are WP:BLP violations — DaxServer (t · m · c) 12:39, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 13:01, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:04, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Logged WP:GS/SASG enforcement,. Previous SP was 6 months, so escalated to one year.. Feel free to discuss if overly onerous, but it looks like the way to go Or make edit requests. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:04, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 21:36, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: An IP-user changes "she" and "her" to "they", "them", "their". No consensus or discussion on the talk page. Mann Mann (talk) 14:32, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:36, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Regular admin action. You never think of MOS:GENDERID going the other way --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:36, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 21:36, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 19:58, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 20:03, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – PR-based edits. ViperSnake151  Talk  15:33, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The user making the disruptive edits is already autoconfirmed. Ks0stm (TCGE) 17:59, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: Juliebozyk (talk · contribs) blocked by Jake Wartenberg. Ks0stm (TCGE) 17:59, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Hi my name is Malcolm London. I am the artist and poet this page is about. I am activist and organizer who has a lot for public visibility for a lot of my work. Work I am proud of but people random people come on here to slander my name and misreport facts. The first time I saw my wikipage it stated I was arrested and sent to jail for sexual assault which is entire UNTRUE. I have been arrested but never for anything like that. I have been arrested at protest and beaten by the police on several occasions. As a community member I have been called out for sexual misconduct and I've addressed those things publicly and aim to accountable for them. I would like to lock my page so that myself and other authorized users can make edits that have the correct information. The wrong information has costed me a several employment opportunities. My public twitter account has the correct and transparent information but Wiki is often the first page people see or respond to. I am begging you for protection so that people aren't reporting on sensitive information that is affecting my livelihood. I would certainly be willing discuss the sensitive nature via email or phone. Please protect this page so that people are not disrespecting me, my work or misnaming the harm of survivors. Qu3stionThatN33dAnsw3rs (talk) 17:00, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Protection is not needed here; discussion on the talk page is. At the moment, in fact, the section of the article discussing the allegations is actually rather favorable to you due to your edits. But it cannot state that the allegations are false, as much as you believe, because a) they were published in the Chicago Reader, a reliable source, so only if it was reported there or in another reliable source that there was at least some doubt about their veracity could the article even begin to say that and b) all that it says now is that the allegations were made, not that it definitely occurred as stated. Daniel Case (talk) 17:56, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent nameless user committed vandalism on page with strange typos and broken web-links. ObiKKa (talk) 17:52, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ks0stm (TCGE) 18:46, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -- lomrjyo 🇺🇦 21:06, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 21:33, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of vandalism in the last few days. Drummingman Talk 21:16, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Considering the extensive history of protection and ongoing vandalism issues, Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 21:35, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

22 April 2022

Reason: High level of vandalism. MT111222 (talk) 18:09, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:08, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Shadyyam1 (talk) 19:49, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There have been no edits of any kind since 16 April, and no edits by an IP user since 3 April. Jayron32 19:56, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:17, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration enforcement Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will be logging momentarily. Ks0stm (TCGE) 22:25, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent additions against WP:LIVESCORES, many different IPs and SPI accounts making changes. Putting request in for transparency. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 14:10, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was baffled for a second that an administrator would place a page protection request. But transparency is always good to have I guess. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 23:28, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
CollectiveSolidarity, it may also be about involvement, not just transparency. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:22, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of until 2022-05-03, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:30, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Same user edit warring with both account and IP to violate WP:NOTCATALOG. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 14:24, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User warned.
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:34, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Advaita2222 (talk) 23:45, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean H. C. Verma, Advaita2222? --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:58, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Malcolmxl5, yes. Thank you so much.
Advaita2222 (talk) 00:07, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Page protected, Advaita2222 warned about verifiability requirements.
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:58, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 01:02, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:02, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. IP users (or 1 across multiple IPs), edit warring to include external links that are violation of WP:EL in multiple regards. Curbon7 (talk) 02:05, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:16, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent additions of promotional material like You can now watch all television production of BITAG on its Youtube Channel, BITAG Official. from more than one likely undisclosed paid editors. DanCherek (talk) 03:14, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:15, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:38, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:02, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Someone has been continuously editing this page adding the same piece of unfactual information (that the fictional region of Sinnoh is based on the UK, rather than a part of Japan - you can Google this very easily to check it's wrong), which isn't being reverted quickly as it's somewhat niche and likely wouldn't be picked up by recent changes patrollers. They are using a new IP every 1-3 times they do it. -- NotCharizard 🗨 01:54, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:13, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. 5.38.160.0/19 blocked x 6 months. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:13, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of disruptive editing, edit-warring and use of multiple accounts. Jingiby (talk) 03:39, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:19, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Redirected per AfD closure being undone. Need protection against re-creation. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:22, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 06:39, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP disruption. Every edit since the start of March is either disruption or it being reverted. FDW777 (talk) 07:27, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:36, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unreferenced and unconstructive edits from IP users. TheHotwiki (talk) 07:36, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:34, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Txkk (talk) 10:58, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:38, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. Hey man im josh (talk) 11:44, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. WP:ARBEE --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:49, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent protection by Ad Orientem reached end of period; immediately the same problem- IP addresses adding alleged biographical information (mainly about claimed royal background; these aggrandising edits coinciding with article subject's current heightened media profile) with no citations- returned. This page clearly requires some kind of long-term protection/ monitoring. 88.109.205.41 (talk) 11:45, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:58, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Victor Trevor (talk) 11:51, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 11:53, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 88.245.17.220 (talk) 11:23, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:31, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Large scale changes of British to English, which is considered controversial. 88.245.17.220 (talk) 12:11, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Article has been Pending Changes protected indefinitely since 2017. The level of disruptive editing does not justify an increase in protection level at this time. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:11, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism. 88.245.17.220 (talk) 14:01, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:14, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Same as 2022 Suwon Samsung Bluewings season, disrupted by socks of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bule Cloud/Archive without any will to communicate or using talk pages Snowflake91 (talk) 14:44, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:16, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 10:58, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Updation required for the image? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:35, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not really, the image is moderately recent one (2017). The subject hasn't changed much since, and no new free image is available. But an IP removes it every now and then, perhaps IP range block to this page would do (Diffs: [78], [79], [80], [81], [82]) -- Ab207 (talk) 12:33, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
They have reverted again, despite leaving a message at their talk. -- Ab207 (talk) 12:59, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:46, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Let me know if that does not stop them, please. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:46, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:05, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page has been vandalised since November 2021, and it's still not fixed. Her name in her infobox says "get free". 88.245.17.220 (talk) 11:33, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, that was done in March https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Getter_Jaani&diff=prev&oldid=1075943726&diffmode=source --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:44, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I know, but i think this page should be semi protected to not get vandalisms from that IP. 88.245.17.220 (talk) 11:45, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:49, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That's, not, fair... 88.245.17.220 (talk) 11:56, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Did you really vandalize the page here, and then request protection a month later? ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:57, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
First of all, wikipedia has more protected pages of male celebrities. 88.245.17.220 (talk) 11:59, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
WOT! M8T! --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:59, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I'm right. 88.245.17.220 (talk) 12:00, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Some one seems close to a block for WP:POINT. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:00, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ok sorry. 88.245.17.220 (talk) 12:00, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please use the reply button for the indents --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:01, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What? What's that? 88.245.17.220 (talk) 12:01, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. bloody indents don't always indent. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:03, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
FWIW, the protection was requested before Deepfriedokra reverted the edit from March. Lectonar (talk) 12:03, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm confused. 88.245.17.220 (talk) 12:04, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

They're talking about the reply tool. Ks0stm (TCGE) 12:06, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. 88.245.17.220 (talk) 12:06, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry. 88.245.17.220 (talk) 13:58, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 16:27, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection - Current TFA and has had increased level of vandalism and disruptive edits. [83] [84] [85] [86] [87] Pseud 14 (talk) 12:10, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:06, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Found the button now, sorry. The TFA having an increased number of edits is expected. It has not traditionally been seen as reason for protection; rather, it's been tradition to leave the TFA open to attract newcomers unless the onslaught is really terrible. Has the view on this changed? 2A02:8071:184:DA00:E925:895A:60C7:D542 (talk) 15:28, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The vast majority of non-autoconfirmed edits today have been disruptive. In my judgement that is enough to justify protection. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:31, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Quoting policy, "Today's featured article may be semi-protected just like any other article. But since that article is subject to sudden spurts of vandalism during certain times of day, administrators should semi-protect it for brief periods in most instances." Yet, you've protected for two days. 2A02:8071:184:DA00:E925:895A:60C7:D542 (talk) 15:40, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Two days is a short protection period. Favonian (talk) 15:47, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Emphasis on "certain times of day". 2A02:8071:184:DA00:E925:895A:60C7:D542 (talk) 15:49, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:59, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:02, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Practically all edits this month have been IP vandalism, some of it defamatory of a living person, or reversion thereof. Philip Trueman (talk) 16:11, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:18, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive IP editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:54, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:09, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:18, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:27, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism. 88.245.17.220 (talk) 13:55, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an admin but I don't see any vandalism on that page. Maybe only the most recent edit but I'm not entirely sure on that. Regardless, I highly doubt that would be enough to warrant page protection. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 14:01, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:12, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Dealer07 who is using Greek IPs in the range Special:Contributions/94.66.56.0/24. Binksternet (talk) 15:00, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The range can be blocked, or protection given to the above article and also the following: Valon Berisha, Muharrem Qena, Mërgim Vojvoda, Yasha Malekzad and Darko Dimitrov. Thanks in advance. Binksternet (talk) 15:02, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. /24 range blocked x 6 months. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:19, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

One week semi protection: In the news candidate, receiving uncited and battleground edits by multiple unregistered users. Ecrusized (talk) 15:29, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:34, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: It is today's FA. Very bearable edit volume at about 4 edits per hour currently. 2A02:8071:184:DA00:E925:895A:60C7:D542 (talk) 15:14, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian (talk) 15:17, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I concur. Most of the non-autoconformed edits today have been disruptive. Sorry. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:25, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism. 88.245.17.220 (talk) 15:37, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough disruption to require protection. 2A02:8071:184:DA00:E925:895A:60C7:D542 (talk) 15:50, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edit 11 March. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:15, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:56, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism, someone kept adding "from England". 88.245.17.220 (talk) 15:44, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. /64 blocked by Acroterion. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:17, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:56, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – My sandbox keeps getting vandalised. Airtransat236 (let's talk) 15:56, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 16:05, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:34, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:37, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. (She's a local politician who said something stupid and offensive in a campaign ad. So naturally random people on the Internet are trying to prove they can be more stupid and offensive.) GRuban (talk) 20:27, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 20:37, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: TFA for just another few hours. Only had 34 edits today as of this writing. Little point having it be TFA if the owner gets it locked down asap. 2A02:8071:184:DA00:F424:9632:1E3B:D8BB (talk) 19:41, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've reset the protection to expire in a few hrs. I am guessing that once it falls off the main page the disruption will cease. -Ad Orientem (talk) 21:07, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ad Orientem has just made an alteration to the protection duration that if I understand correctly is slightly cynical as it has the protection expiring exactly minutes after the article leaves the front page. 2A02:8071:184:DA00:F424:9632:1E3B:D8BB (talk) 21:21, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you :)
Done
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:17, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page is about the largest province in Pakistan (110 million people) so deserves protection and it has been vandalised multiple times before — Preceding unsigned comment added by MT111222 (talkcontribs) 17:09, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 18:27, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Removal/blanking for 2 days in row. Sir Tragedy (talk) 17:44, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 18:26, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: To protect that hard worked edits MandarPeshwe (talk) 19:02, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:38, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

23 April 2022

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cheers! Fakescientist8000 20:18, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:46, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Deepfriedokra Thank you! Cheers! Fakescientist8000 20:47, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
My pleasure! --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:58, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 58.171.133.63 (talk) 21:23, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Less Unless (talk) 21:53, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Painting17 (talk) 23:13, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also BLP violations Painting17 (talk) 23:15, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mz7 (talk) 01:38, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Increased vandalism as of recent, Windows 7 already has indefinite semi-protected status Winderz IoT (talk) 21:48, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mz7 (talk) 01:40, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Lots of vandalism and weird editing, at least some by IP and some by users who aren't autoconfirmed I think? Elemimele (talk) 22:39, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mz7 (talk) 01:43, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Nonconstructive editing by IPs. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 23:14, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated IP vandalism from multiple IPs. Ganesha811 (talk) 00:42, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive IP editors. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:51, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article subject is a well-known and well-followed figure on social media who has recently been in the news for allegations that his attorney (and at least one IP editor) characterizes as part of a "smear campaign" (without evidence). Recommend increasing the protection level for this page until the heat around recent press coverage dies down.
Examples:

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism and disruptive editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 03:49, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – low-frequency persistent vandalism since Aug 2021. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 03:51, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. FMSky (talk) 04:26, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user is causing problems elsewhere too. I think a block on this IP will do the thing. It has been already reported to AIV. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 04:35, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated IP vandalism from the same IP user. Brother04 (talk) 04:45, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent vandalism takes place on the page. I keep asking the unregistered editors to stop putting fake information but they aren't listening. They keep putting contestant Munawar as the winner despite the show having two more weeks to go before the finale. So I hope that the page is protected because of the vandalism taking place. Nikita Bhamidipati (talk) 05:41, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes this is happening too often. Recommend semi-protection. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 06:23, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:05, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. InfiniteNexus (talk) 05:47, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:07, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Request for temporary page protection against IP's who over the past few days remove or replace sourced content with nonsense and other trivial edits such as changing population numbers. Dawit S Gondaria (talk) 07:51, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:08, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of vandalism following the subject getting a Google Doodle. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 08:29, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:12, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 11:31, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:38, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Lot's of IP vandalism - if anyone wants to contest WP:PROD deletion they can do so on the talk page Phil Bridger (talk) 14:56, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:10, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I deProDed as it looks like a BLP violation and the subjec tmight be notable --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:11, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Phil Bridger: and reProDed sans BLP violation. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:16, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting decrease to semi-protected. Repeated edits prior to protection were all from a single IP user. Retswerb (talk) 00:04, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Protection was applied for edit warring, it doesn't matter if it an IP was involved. Protection expires tomorrow. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 14:27, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent BLP vio, revdel-worthy vandalism since Apr 2021. Please also consider revdelling and blocking 72.143.192.162 and 2605:8D80:64C:CDE5:402B:7212:9117:AF66. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 05:21, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The former IP is on the range 72.143.192.128/26. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 05:29, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: majority of edits in the last 12 months are adding or removing vandalism. Revdels done, a few missed. Adakiko (talk) 09:52, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:01, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Please rereport when they return --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:01, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 18:32, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing/edit warring. BilCat (talk) 11:13, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:21, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Please rereport and ping me when they return. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:21, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 18:32, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism, adding made up content that never existed in main talk page. See Special:Diff/1084293561 for the third time this was added after twice being reverted. Each time a new IP. CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talkCL) 17:35, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:55, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is being brigaded by reddit. Request protection until the article is deleted. CivilianArthur (talk) 14:47, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:10, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:10, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: To prevent vandalism Bawah Nama Cinta (talk) 15:29, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP block evasion / edit warring. MrOllie (talk) 16:19, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 18:31, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of disruptive editing from one newly registered user followed by a set of edit-warring IPs. WP:NOTHERE; WP:SPA: WP:NATIONALIST. The article is under arbitration enforcement: WP:ARBMAC. Jingiby (talk) 12:52, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:10, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Regular admin action. No admin would question this. Will escalate to ARBMAC if needs be. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:10, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 19:55, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I was asked to add more information and photos as well as update the status of the group and remove false information about allegations. The “history” tab keeps getting deleted and replaced with false information and seems like a personal vendetta against the artist at the sake of public knowledge. Kerberosmusic (talk) 16:07, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent changes by IPs without sources. Ab207 (talk) 18:48, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ymblanter (talkcontribs) 18:49, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Moxy- 14:29, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 day., after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:39, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Wrong version. Someone might want to restore status quo ante, but I get myself into trouble that way. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:39, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:56, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: remove G5 content --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:56, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 20:51, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Same person, multiple IPs restarted disruptive editing 30 minutes after 7-day PP expired. Adakiko (talk) 19:58, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 20:40, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Involved in major sporting event, influx of editors vandalising as the fight gets closer. Solipsism 101 (talk) 20:54, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:01, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Probably needs semi until the court stuff blows over. Repeated disruptive vandalism attacking the article subject. Probably needs a check of the history for revdels of disruptive material as well. Thanks. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:59, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Quite a bit of vandalism in a short time by different IPs. Drummingman Talk 19:30, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:36, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP-hopping vandal insists on piping Real Zaragoza to Zaragoza. User:Mattythewhite and myself have tried to resist this, but given the vandal is on a shifting IP, I doubt the message is getting through. – PeeJay 20:57, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:05, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

24 April 2022

Reason: Multiple IPs continuing vandalism & edit-warring GoodDay (talk) 20:27, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@GoodDay: Eh? It is the sandbox. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:56, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. at 176.59.72.0/23. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:39, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Genre warring in the article. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 00:48, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:15, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Huge amount of IP vandalism. Fijipedia (talk) 00:49, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:17, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Genre warring and sockpuppetry in the article. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 00:50, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:19, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary extended confirmed protection needed. An increasingly single purpose account (Zaikadu) is reintroducing potentially controversial claims about this person paternal origin without seeking consensus. IP's are overturning that and in turn uninvolved editors are reverting the IP. Nobody is seeking out the talkpage to reach an consensus. Temporary protection for this article to stop this edit warring. Dawit S Gondaria (talk) 09:00, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:22, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – mainly persistent unreliable change of height. Kpddg (talk) 09:12, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:18, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – POV change to language order by IP sock of banned user User:K.D Manikya Tripuri. Confirmed sockfarm edits - [88] [89] [90] [91]. IP edits - [92] [93] [94]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:14, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:16, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Ak-eater06 (talk) 09:37, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:15, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent disruption from shifting IP, article locked already. CMD (talk) 09:42, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:12, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: The origin of borscht is Ukraine is based on reliable sources and long-standing consensus amongst registered editors. Since the beginning of the war in Ukraine, there has been a steady stream of IP editors (whose IP addresses almost all lead to Russia) who change the origin to "Russia", sometimes with comments that "Ukraine didn't exist when borscht was invented" on the Talk Page, parroting the political POV of Ukraine's Russian invaders. A restriction on IP editors should be sufficient to block most of the war-influenced editing against consensus. "Temporary" should be understood to mean "for the duration of the war". TaivoLinguist (Taivo) (talk) 08:40, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Leave me be, bot, I was here 9th! Erm: : Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 11:38, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Small amount of disruption over last couple of days. Fade258 (talk) 08:45, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:31, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Removal/change of sourced content and addition of unsourced by IP range [95] [96] [97]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:48, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:28, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite Semi-Protection. Persistent unsourced addition. This is getting tiresome, this article has been protected many times, and its time to protect indefinitely. OnlyFixingProse (talk) 08:49, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 11:24, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Dynamic IP keeps adding fake cast info Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 08:59, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:28, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Many IP edits are happening and doing changes without any sourcesTuluveRai123 (talk) 04:49, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:45, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 05:17, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:44, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Also, the last edit summary needs to be redacted. Austronesier (talk) 08:36, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:41, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Likely COI editors are removing RS content and inserting puffery. This is a page with a history of lots of COI editing. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 13:58, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Gah. would need xtended confirmed --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:11, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 23:16, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:03, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:04, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Linkspam - multiple IP users spamming across several. articles including this one. BilCat (talk) 23:49, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:05, 24 April 2022 (UTC): User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:05, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Ongoing IP vandalism/NPOV issues. This page was very recently protected, but a series of bot actions seemed to unprotect it, I think. CT55555 (talk) 23:54, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@CT55555: No, the protection expired. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:07, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I see. Thanks for re-protecting and for explaining. CT55555 (talk) 11:56, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:11, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Protect against unwanted edits by an unknown entity or group of entities. Hisarat (talk) 10:31, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Stale, before the OP's edits, the last ones were in Feb. El_C 11:09, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi protection is needed, due to unregistered users who change it frequently. Boris Dimitrov (talk) 09:56, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Boris Dimitrov, change is allowed. It has to be bad change for it to be... bad. El_C 11:11, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Increase in edits in favour of the Marcos narrative/revisionism, especially in light of their renewed prominence due to the late dictator's run for the Philippine presidency in this year's elections. 120.28.248.183 (talk) 12:49, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:29, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant attempts by multiple (I suspect sock) spa IP's to insert soapboxing calls for Na no fly zone. Slatersteven (talk) 12:53, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Acroterion. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:32, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and insult by IPs of this living person (even in the current version of the article). Khestwol (talk) 12:55, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:36, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Generic Wrugtrab (talk) 18:17, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 11:48, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Highly visible page – Missing change/add to move protection (extended confirmed move protection). Wrugtrab (talk) 18:32, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 11:47, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason:
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Generic Wrugtrab (talk) 18:42, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 11:47, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: He has done many interviews and has a specific way he wishes to promote himself. His Wikipedia page needs to represent his wishes. If true research is done, then you’d see what his truth is. It’s a part of his character. I understand if you want to say his real name Donovan Danhausen is -whatever- but his character Danhausen is different. He created his page and I want to protect it. I’ve thoroughly researched his persona. Interviews, watched matches, how he interacts with fans, and get accurate information from his father. All the things the “character” Danhausen says. People editing this page are changing everything to the human. Example, his height/weight. He did a verbal interview with Fightful. He said what his height/weight is. It can be referenced and I changed it. But someone else wishes to make sure it’s Donovan as a person. They did a different reference that was older. Danhausen is a character!! His Wikipedia page needs to be accurate as Danhausen THE WRESTLER! His page should be protected as such. It’s like if you changed RuPauls page to be all of her as a man. RuPaul is a character. Just as Danhausen is. Despite what some individuals think…his character needs 100% protection. Wndr Twin Powers (talk) 06:28, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. El_C 11:42, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Veracious ^(•‿•)^ 13:28, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:41, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Veracious ^(•‿•)^ 13:35, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:44, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Veracious ^(•‿•)^ 13:39, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:50, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Veracious ^(•‿•)^ 13:42, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:51, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Content dispute while discussion is trying to occur. Curbon7 (talk) 03:23, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:28, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Probably stale. Experienced editors who know about "discuss" --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:28, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 16:01, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The page was protected due to disruptive edits by various IPs. After the page protection expired it started again. It would lead to 3RR since the user is multiple IPs and not ready to discuss and continue POV edits. AntanO 04:01, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:33, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Content dispute between non auto confirmed and extended confirmed editors --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:33, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 16:01, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Requesting temporary semi-protection on this article due to several IPs making low-quality, likely vandalism edits. Rollbacks have been reverted by offending users. ★Ama TALK CONTRIBS 15:56, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:32, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. FozzieHey (talk) 16:15, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:34, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In the backrooms wikipedia page I would add more levels since the 9 levels are commonly talked all throughout the internet. Ethanman6969 (talk) 11:56, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you bring this up - with sources - on the article talk page and then make an edit request for the specific change that you want to make. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:12, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian (talk) 13:41, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Section "Health": "Putin is has reportedly been receiving treatment [...]" seems grammatically incorrect to me. I suggest: "Putin has reportedly been receiving treatment [...]" Nimda12345679 (talk) 15:54, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done I have made this minor change. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:29, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Constant edit warring by IPs and others over the identity of the fourth F for the past 2+ years. The fourth F has long been uncited despite this edit war, until I added a source today. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 04:04, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:39, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: FWIW, I seem to remember a class in which it was stated that the fourth "F" was the word that gave such offense . --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:39, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 18:43, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: As usual, IP vandalism resumes one day after PP ended – [98]. That's three PPs since December 2021. Suggest extending it to indefinite or at least a much longer period, like a year or more. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 11:57, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:24, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Not to be confused with Omelas --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:24, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 18:43, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent vandalism, disruptive editing and ignorance of WP:COMMONNAME over long-term period of time. livelikemusic (TALK!) 13:13, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:38, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: low intensity but persistent since previous protection expired. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:39, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 18:43, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Adding end date of show without sources. So it needs protection. Editor won't get warning notification as they use mobile phone for editing. Shinnosuke15, 14:43, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: prevent vandalism KatiMedi (talk) 15:00, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:05, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:05, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 17:43, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Mattythewhite. Favonian (talk) 19:18, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – an open-proxy IP user continuously edit-warring and removing a reliable and relevant further reading from the article. ─ The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 17:54, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User is inserting the book by unreliable author named Mushtaq Tijarvi. They were told to prove its reliability. But they are fail to do it instead edit warring. Please see the article history. It is a content dispute but not vandalism, which should be discussed on Article's talk. But there are no such discussion there. 103.44.61.181 (talk) 18:21, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You've been removing it continuously without a legit valid reason. Gain the consensus first, and then get it removed, until then the article will remain as it as been prior to your removal of the FR. Before that, I'll continue reverting your disruptive edits again and again. The onus is on you to prove that this book is unreliable and so is its author, which you cannot. ─ The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 18:45, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It is what we called as Editwarring which you are doing now, once you have enough evidences that author is reliable and have gain the consensus of community please feel free to add it. I have no problem. 103.44.61.15 (talk) 18:53, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

edit warring is what you are doing, I'm just doing what was there before you began disruption. Start a discussion and gain consensus that the author is unreliable and so is the book. Then I won't have any problem if the community consensus decides the source is unreliable and is removed. For now, it is not. ─ The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 18:59, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear admins, this has now turned into a serious content dispute and the IP user is adamant and doesn't want to gain the consensus first. I told them that gain consensus that the respective scholarly source is unreliable and then get it removed and besides that they are continuously removing it. Please protect it until the talk page discussion reaches any consensus. Regards, 19:30, 24 April 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by AafiOnMobile (talkcontribs) 19:30, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Also blocked a bunch of proxies and upgraded Hajrakhala's block to indef. --Blablubbs (talk) 19:35, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sockpuppetry. M.Bitton (talk) 12:43, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 20:39, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. 22% of the past 50 edits are vandalism. Take note of the fact the page has been protected like 5 times before, and the most recent protection was for 6 months, but the most recent protection was 2 1/2 years ago. interstatefive  (talk) - just another roadgeek 15:31, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days., after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 20:38, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Engr. Smitty Werben 03:06, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 20:41, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Qzd (talk) 19:42, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:47, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits from IP users. TheHotwiki (talk) 03:19, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Deepfriedokra. Less Unless (talk) 20:44, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: semi-protection - recent uptick in vand/unref edits from various ip Dl2000 (talk) 17:04, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 20:46, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 17:10, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 20:49, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeat vandalism. LEPRICAVARK (talk) 14:52, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:52, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Source misrepresentation and WP:OR. Kansas Bear (talk) 01:27, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:56, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent addition of uncited information and disruptive editing. Itsquietuptown ✉️📜 03:10, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Way too much editing for Pending Changes. The election will be over in a few weeks so hopefully things will calm down by time this expires. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:00, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and addition of incorrect information. Egghead06 (talk) 15:39, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:17, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP hopping vandalism which returns every time protection expires (last expired April 9): [99] [100]. — Shibbolethink ( ) 16:47, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:01, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Paul Vaurie (talk) 17:48, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:15, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Request pending changes, which I requested last time but the page was semied instead. IP addresses, possibly the same person, are persistently adding false information to this page which has been the subject of talk page discussion in the past. Discussion and sources have consensus that the IP's edits are incorrect. This IP user has never made one word of edit summary or talk page posts. The user makes a few North-Macedonia edits at a time in its sessions. The page has few watchers and this disruption is persistent and sporadic, which is what pending changes is for. Unknown Temptation (talk) 18:01, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:21, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Resumption of warring on expiration of protection, re non RS that do not demonstrate these are "cover versions/renditions important enough to have gained attention in their own right". Mutt Lunker (talk) 19:25, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:23, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Extended content
Jack Massey Welsh
File:Thumb
Personal information
Born23 June 1996
OccupationYoutuber
YouTube information
Also known asJackSucksAtStuff
Channel
Years active2013-present
100,000 subscribers2014
1,000,000 subscribers2019

Jack Massey Welsh (born June 24, 1996 [23]), known online as JackSucksAtLife (now formerly JackSucksAtMinecraft), is an English YouTuber. He was born and raised in Bishop Auckland, England. He previously lived in North Yorkshire but currently lives in Nottinghamshire, England. He also runs many other channels such as JackSucksAtStuff, JackMasseyWelsh, JackSucksAtGeography, as well as many others.

After registering in 2013, Jack primarily posted Minecraft Let's Play videos. In 2014, he hit 100 thousand subscribers. Over time, his style has diversified to include reaction videos, challenge videos, and play button videos.

Other things Jack is known for include promoting Larry in his video 'This is the new Pewdiepie vs T-Series'. He is also known for playing the Kazoo, collecting YouTube Creator Awards, and eating an Eggplant. He has had drama with The Original Ace, who claimed that Jack had stolen his sponsor, even though Jack was sponsored by Drop (at the time called Massdrop) first. However, this was later revealed to have been faked for the videos. As well as having drama with The Original Ace, he has also had drama with Willz The King.

Jack used to make many Minecraft videos on his main channel, including series such as, Hacker Catching Trolling, One Life, and Harmony Hollow. However in 2019 he moved his Minecraft videos to his channel JackSucksAtStuff.

Creator Awards

Jack has an ongoing series on his channel in which he aims to get as many Creator Awards as possible. He currently had nine real Creator Awards, two fake Creator Awards, one yet to arrive, and one miscellaneous award.

  • Original 'JackSucksAtMinecraft' Silver Play Button, November 2014[1]
  • Bought 'JackSucksAtLife' Silver Play Button, April 2019[2]
  • Earned 'JackSucksAtStuff' Silver Play Button, August 2019[3]
  • Bought 'Skeppy' Gold Play Button, October 2019[4]
  • Bought fake 'turdboi420' November 2019[5]
  • Bought fake 'PewDiePie 50 Million Award', November 2019[5]
  • Bought fake 'JackMasseyWelsh' Red Play Button, November 2019[5]
  • Bought fake 'JackSucksAtLife' Silver Play Button (Later Play Button Necklace), November 2019[5]
  • Earned 'JackSucksAtLife' Gold Play Button, November 2019[6]
  • Earned 'SamSmellsOfApricots' Silver Play Button, December 2019[7]
  • Selfmade 'JackSuckAtLife' Youtube Award, February 2020[8]
  • Earned 'Jack Massey Welsh' Silver Play Button, February 2020
  • Given 'JackSucksRyGuyRulez' Custom Gold Play Button (Hydro Dipped), April 2020[9]
  • Earned 'JackSucksAtGeography' Silver Play Button, April 2020
  • Earned 'turd boi420' Silver Play Button, April 2020
  • Bought 'KSI 10 Million Award', July 2020 10
  • Earned ' JacksSucksAtPopUpPirate' Silver Play Button,September 2020
  • Earned ' JacksEpicYoutubeChannelFullOfFunTimesAndFunHiRickX' Silver Play Button,October 2020
  • Created ' JackSucksAtLife' Youtooz,September 2020
  • Earned ' JackSucksAtLife' Guinness world record reward, October 2020

References

  1. ^ "YouTube". www.youtube.com. Retrieved 2020-06-29.
  2. ^ MY NEW YOUTUBE CREATOR AWARD ARRIVED!, retrieved 2020-06-29
  3. ^ "YouTube". www.youtube.com. Retrieved 2020-06-29.
  4. ^ "YouTube". www.youtube.com. Retrieved 2020-06-29.
  5. ^ a b c d "YouTube". www.youtube.com. Retrieved 2020-06-29.
  6. ^ "YouTube". www.youtube.com. Retrieved 2020-06-29.
  7. ^ I tricked Youtube into giving my dead channel a Play Button, retrieved 2020-06-29
  8. ^ "YouTube". www.youtube.com. Retrieved 2020-06-29.
  9. ^ "YouTube". www.youtube.com. Retrieved 2020-06-29.

MaxDeepCoder (talk) 16:19, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – Only confirms why this page is salted. Favonian (talk) 16:25, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@MaxDeepCoder: For the record, YouTube citations are only acceptable if (1) the creator is one we'd consider a reliable source in the first place and (2) the video is uploaded to that creatoir's verified channel. We do not cite the subject or anything they directly helped to produce.Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 19:24, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

25 April 2022

Pending changes protection - Reason: High level of edits by New created accounts and Anon IPs that continuously uses Social media, Twitter and Facebook as a source for Partisan claims. Mr.User200 (talk) 19:35, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. per WP:ACDS/ Eastern Europe. This page is going to attract vandals and POV editing like moths to a lamp. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:38, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Unsourced additions by many different IPs FozzieHey (talk) 20:47, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:41, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced content. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 22:29, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:46, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant uncivil WP:GREATWRONGS demands to remove “sir”. Dronebogus (talk) 08:48, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 20:32, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated insertion of copyrighted content (logos) which have been deleted many times. Only way to stop this is to stop the disruptive editors from being able to edit this page to add these repeated copyvio images. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:03, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. I see no basis for full protection. Bbb23 (talk) 20:34, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This is the first time I have requested this, and perhaps it is too minor. This page was initially rejected at AfC for lacking sources and not being written in a neutral/encyclopedic tone. I found the draft, added sources to demonstrate notability, and moved it to the mainspace. Since then Nico C35, YeonL, and an IP editor have added back the WP:PUFFERY. Their only edits on Wikipedia are to this page. I am not adverse to corrections, indeed I made two errors on the page I moved to the mainspace (and have corrected them), but the puffery seems a bit much ('innovator skillset','deep knowledge','critical inventions','great potential',brilliant female engineer','innovative thinker').
Thanks for your help and consideration. DaffodilOcean (talk) 13:26, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 20:36, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of Non-User Edit vandalization,
alot of user based works and contributions are basically removed because of this type of vandalization which is illegal.
NameIsShaheer (talk) 16:19, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 20:38, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 18:53, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 20:39, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Less Unless (talk) 20:41, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: "Run-on sentences" section is subject to repeated vandalism (vandals keep removing punctuation, thus turning the section into a run-on sentence itself) Marisauna (talk) 22:41, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 20:39, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Quite amount of disruption over the last two months. Fade258 (talk) 13:37, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 20:42, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. BangJan1999 19:28, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless (talk) 20:45, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article was previously protected on 6 April and 27 March. Protection expired a few days ago and the disruptive IP editor is back: [101], [102]. Robby.is.on (talk) 17:12, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:05, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:05, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article was previously protected on 22 March and 9 March. Protection expired today and the disruptive IP editor is back: [103]. It's the same editor as at Hakim Ziyech‎. Robby.is.on (talk) 17:14, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. I've range blocked both IPs for 3 months. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:08, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent targetting of article and talk page by WP:BE IP socks of User:92.14.216.40. Mutt Lunker (talk) 17:44, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:13, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Ak-eater06 (talk) 19:31, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:25, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent removal of cited but controversial information. Cerebral726 (talk) 21:52, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 2601:183:4400:A5F0::/64 x 3 months. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:44, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Potential edit war. – 333-blue at 01:07, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:25, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Multiple users have added many uncited sections. There has also been occasional vandalism, by users explicitly violating WP:AGF,[104] and accusing others of personal attacks. Saxones288 (talk) 01:23, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:27, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ad Orientem, it seems like the main individual continues to edit the page.[105] Saxones288 (talk) 01:29, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
To Ad Orientem, my apologies for my last edit on the page, as it was being made as the page was being semi-protected.
Edits were made by the user who requested semi-protected status after the page had been dormant for an extended period of time. To me, this was interpreted as WP:VANDAL and WP:PA; however, I am not closed to alternative interpretations. TheHelixYT (talk) 01:40, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: any imbalances have been rectified and there also inaccuracies in the text which need to be corrected. 2A00:23C4:1394:9C00:A57F:E465:7B8F:4BD6 (talk) 20:49, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@2A00:23C4:1394:9C00:A57F:E465:7B8F:4BD6. If you have any suggestions for improving the article, please make them on the article talk page. Given the very long history of problematic editing at this article, I doubt protection will be lifted any time soon - courtesy ping to User:El C, the protecting administrator. You are of course blocked from editing the article in any case. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:34, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done OP has been blocked for two years. Moving on. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:42, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Ad Orientem (talk) 02:43, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page has suffered various forms of vandalism. Titus Gold (talk) 02:00, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ks0stm (TCGE) 02:08, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandal adding grossly offensive material. Previously blocked, but returned under a different account; seems page protection is needed. Solipsism 101 (talk) 04:45, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:14, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of disruption and vandalism in the recent (past few days/week) past... RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 04:46, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:15, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Increasing levels of traffic and edits. Topic receiving increased publicity and so deserves some increased protection. Titus Gold (talk) 02:02, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 05:09, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: New page. Increased levels of traffic and relevance with historical and political ties. Deserves increased protection. Titus Gold (talk) 02:03, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 05:10, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The topic has become increasingly discussed in the media. Page edits have increased substantially and deserves increased protection. Titus Gold (talk) 02:05, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 05:10, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page has had some poor edits and poor standard of edits, sometimes biased, leaning both ways. Page deserves further protection. Titus Gold (talk) 02:06, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 05:11, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Page edit frequency increased and multiple sub-standard edits. Important page and therefore deserves further protection from minimally experienced editors. Titus Gold (talk) 02:14, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 05:11, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit warring, a high number of reverting. Increased traffic and edits. This article is about an important historical figure in Wales and so deserves increased protection. Titus Gold (talk) 02:17, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 05:11, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: An important page of high quality which deserves protection. Far more edits now happening on this page with a high number of edit-warring and reverting edits. Titus Gold (talk) 02:26, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 05:12, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Vandalized by new registered user and IP user a lot recently. PAVLOV (talk) 09:01, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:16, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Intriguing that thouse two VAU accounts should have edited same page. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:16, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:16, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Addition of Unsourced content and persistent disruption from users and IP. signed, 511KeV (talk) 11:11, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. As above. El_C 12:30, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Jetstreamer Talk 11:57, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 12:32, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:47, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:01, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. A page frequented by school students, with predictable results... 🙄 Not a crazy amount of vandalism, but almost nothing constructive. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 13:33, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's see how a year does things before we go indefinite. Ks0stm (TCGE) 13:50, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
46.212.218.54 (talk) 11:14, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pandit Jawahar Lal Nehru, the first PM of India

I’m sorry 46.212.218.54 but I have no idea what it is you are asking. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:49, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:58, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:15, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Unsourced find-and-replace "fixes" and undiscussed page moves. Sumanuil. 07:02, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Warn the user first, they're obviously new. El_C 12:27, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: As with the township. Sumanuil. 07:03, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. As above. El_C 12:28, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:55, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 14:00, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism over the past day. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:56, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of another month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 14:08, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 16:01, 25 April 2022 (UTC) 16:01, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Jayron32 16:22, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Persistent vandalism from IPs and new accounts. FozzieHey (talk) 16:05, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 16:25, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:27, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The IP who vandalized it in June 2020 was protected, however since it was the proxy IP that has been blocked twice, protection is no longer necessary. Protect it again if problems occur. 142.112.236.29 (talk) 05:52, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Materialscientist: Pinging protecting admin. I'm a bit torn on this one. The vandalism that occurred prior to protection seemed pretty routine, so jumping straight to indef protection seems like it might have been overkill. On the other hand, with the invasion of Ukraine still ongoing, articles on these kinds of subjects are at higher risk for vandalism, so I'd be a bit hesitant to unprotect too. Maybe split the difference and make the protection expire in a few months? Just a suggestion. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 14:34, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Scottywong: I'm not sure but I think Materialscientist has disabled ping notifications. —usernamekiran (talk) 18:26, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Usernamekiran: I think you are right. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:02, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Given current situation, three months more under WP:ARBEE might be reasonable. Till then, the best bet would be to make edit requests. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:05, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That's what I was thinking too, let's go with that. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 19:17, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 19:17, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... (as the bot will likely be confused) —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 19:17, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page was protected since September 2008 due to anon vandalism. The protection should not be necessary. 74.251.40.140 (talk) 06:48, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@NawlinWiki. Pinging the protecting administrator NawlinWiki for their input. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:43, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Is a highly visible page about a notable US state. Should probably stay semi protected. Cranloa12n / talk / contribs / 21:58, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I randomly checked 7 or 8 articles on US States. Of those, only one (New York) did not have some level of protection in place. I am highly skeptical that if unprotected, Ohio will not quickly become the target for disruptive editing. Sometimes we need to use a little commonsense. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:40, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Good to see NawlinWiki is still around! --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:07, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Consensus that unprotecting is unwise. Jayron32 16:51, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page was protected since March 2022 due to persistent sock puppetry. The protection should not be necessary. 36.85.34.109 (talk) 05:00, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I should note the talk page is also semi-protected until August 2022 for the same reason, and that protection predates the current article protection. As it happens, this is a Bambifan target. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 06:07, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Has the threat gone away? It's only been protected for a month. Sumanuil. 08:21, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Known LTA target, only recently protected. Jayron32 16:51, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page was protected since August 2020 due to persistent disruptive editing. The protection should not be necessary. 36.85.34.109 (talk) 05:03, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It’s a deprecated template. Functionally retired or archived. You wouldn’t want a prankster breaking into a retirement home and doing shit to the residents, would you? CreecregofLife (talk) 05:06, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Can't think of any reason for it to be edited. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:09, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That’s exactly my point. It needs the security CreecregofLife (talk) 15:36, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Retired template, no reason to be editing it anyways. Jayron32 16:52, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Content dispute. There is an ongoing discussion but the involved users are continuing to revert each other past the three revert rule. – DarkGlow20:26, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:38, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:42, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Hi, I would like to request the unprotection this page. Thank you. 50.244.129.65 (talk) 17:45, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined No rationale for a change to protection status was provided. Jayron32 18:07, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:46, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Living people

Reason: This page will be protected. 50.244.129.65 (talk) 17:54, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Explain--CreecregofLife (talk) 17:55, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done No coherent rationale given. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:31, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:46, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism by several IPs over the past day. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:19, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 21:52, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 21:52, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. FozzieHey (talk) 19:16, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Bbb23. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:45, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of vandalism today. Carver1889 (talk) 20:20, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:43, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:44, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake, just one vandal. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:46, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor Favonian (talk) 19:54, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Unsourced changes to bio info, multiple IPs. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:04, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 21:57, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page was protected since August 2020 due to persistent sock puppetry. The protection should not be necessary. 36.85.34.109 (talk) 06:28, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cannot imagine why such a highly political and emotionally charged subject would not be a magnet for vandals and disruption. I think the best bet would be to let editors make edit requests. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:11, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
IP, I suggest you take a mulligan and stop throwing darts at a tackboard to see what sticks. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 19:18, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined No real reason given for why this should be unprotected, article is an obvious vandalism magnet. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 19:20, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

26 April 2022

Reason: Persistent vandalism from IPs Skjoldbro (talk) 19:35, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:08, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Frequent unsourced/disruptive edits by IPS. Ab207 (talk) 20:02, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:11, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recurrent vandalism by multiple IPs AndyTheGrump (talk) 21:12, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pedantic protection! El_C 01:15, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Could we please try a period of semi-protection, in the hopes of generating some talk page discussion? The article is frequently edited by non-autoconfirmed users in order to add desired caste classifications or remove undesired ones, with little reliable sourcing or justification for the changes. No recent talk page discussion. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 21:31, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged GS action. El_C 01:32, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 23:03, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:34, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Various IP users are persistently adding an actor to the cast list without a reliable source. The actor’s name does not appear anywhere in the opening or closing credits. I have warned the users to add a source but they ignore warnings and continue their disruptive editing. They all come from the same IP range so it may be the same person. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 23:30, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:35, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism going back years. Itsme92 (talk) 00:27, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. El_C 01:40, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Because people are editing again and again, so protect it. Calling the right information wrong. Please Sir/Madam TheManishPanwar (talk) 17:11, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 22:51, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. LucasKannou (talk) 19:58, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 22:54, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. LucasKannou (talk) 19:59, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 22:55, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – can we please get protection on this? new accounts are popping up as soon as the other finishes an edit and it's obviously being vote brigaded. PRAXIDICAE💕 18:25, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Hopefully, they got the message. El_C 01:00, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Increase to semi-protection. Banned user Jinnifer is back to haunting Talk:Horror films again, this time Jinnifer is trolling other editors, via IPs with personal attacks, using homophobic and ableistic slurs. Mr Fink (talk) 00:12, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 01:37, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: BLP Policy Violations. Also frequent edit warring, partisan views being pushed, subjective and emphatic adjectives being used against policy for BLP ★Ama TALK CONTRIBS 01:54, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Consider indefinite/temporary semi-protection in case of denial. ★Ama TALK CONTRIBS 01:55, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is the first time the article has been protected; let's start with this. Daniel Case (talk) 04:51, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent vandalism, persistent addition of unsourced and/or nonsense future episodes, etc. Magitroopa (talk) 02:12, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:59, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 02:51, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:03, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of WP:OR on BLP. The one citation added does not explain the claims being made in the edits. CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talkCL) 04:31, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:13, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – You know who came back again. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 04:10, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 07:45, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Was being disruptively edited by a registered editor who is now blocked, now same edit being performed by anon. Adakiko (talk) 04:43, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 151.115.43.121 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. Daniel Case (talk) 04:54, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article was in the news lately and is attracting a lot of IP vandals. — Czello 07:28, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 07:44, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Amaury03:36, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but if there is any way to not protect my talk page, I'd prefer to follow that route. Trolls will still find other ways to troll me if they want to. I really don't care about their pathetic excuses for insults that they sling around. I've annoyed enough LTAs that temporary protection would be pretty pointless. Also, they'd just spend their energy on someone else's talkpage, who might not take it as well as I do. I also prefer to be able to communicate with non-autoconfirmed users, due to doing a substantial fraction of my edits on RC patrol. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 06:01, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined as requested by editor Mako001. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:10, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Considering the gravity of the situation, there are bound to be unhelpful edits to the article, so SemiProt would be wise to have for the next month or so. Just so that things can cool down. 🜚 Yatagarasu 🜚 03:41, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:07, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple attempts to overturn Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simba Nagpal against the standard process of deletion review. Jalen Folf (talk) 03:46, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. El_C 08:35, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism (and other forms of disruptive editing) from autoconfirmed users due to the ongoing Twitter purchase. Carolina2k22(talk)(edits) 03:43, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for now. The page is experiencing lot more activity for obvious reasons, but I'm not seeing anything too crazy so far. El_C 08:34, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ditto --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:46, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism TheManishPanwar (talk) 11:27, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 12:08, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 11:52, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 12:06, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs keep changing the WP:COMMONNAME [106] [107] [108] [109]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:25, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:31, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP hopping user has repeatedly changed character names on the page with no source. Character names are based on the end credits of the films currently. SonOfThornhill (talk) 12:52, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I beat the bot! Erm: Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:05, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Most recent changes have been by new editors, POV-pushing sockpuppet editors, or IP addresses. Nearly all have changed the infobox "Islamic terrorism" aspects including the four confirmed named perpetrators. This article needs to be semi-protected or have pending changes implemented in the long term. 10mmsocket (talk) 13:09, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:21, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 12:38, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What, how fast are you, bot? Erm: Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:02, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Too damn fast. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:15, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's a tale as old as time travel. El_C 13:34, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page was protected since August 2021 due to childish troll. The protection should not be necessary. 36.85.34.109 (talk) 07:37, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Why not? Sumanuil. 08:22, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined No reason given for removal of protection. Jayron32 11:57, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Changes have occurred since it was last edited and developments have taken place in South Africa. Disney have partnered with DSTV and this is not edited in JohnTalks (talk) 15:12, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: @JohnTalks: the article name would be useful. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:15, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I have fixed the formatting, though assumptions have been made, and the OP’s comment has replaced the default “The protection is no longer necessary because” message--CreecregofLife (talk) 15:34, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Jayron32 11:59, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The extended user confirmation is not necessary because many people find mistakes in the page which extended confirmed users sometimes do not spot. Only a very small group of extended confirmed users know about the topics of the page. The protection level can be reduced one level. AdvickV (talk) 15:46, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The protection placement is probably recent and this reasoning seems to not take why it happened into consideration. Why not make an edit request? You don’t need to take down an entire security system to deliver a message CreecregofLife (talk) 15:48, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It is recent - it was put under XCP Apr 19, about a week ago. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 01:17, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Jayron32 11:59, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection: User talk page has been repeatedly moved to incorrect locations. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:01, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: seems resolved --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:12, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Deepfriedokra: Both individual moves have been cleaned up after. This doesn't change the fact that the page should be protected to prevent future moves. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:31, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
They were moving their user page to draft space, and the user talk went with it. The user page is now in draft space, so hopefully they are done. I will watch the user talk page in case. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:11, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hopefully I have explained to them adequately that they must not move user pages or user talk pages. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:18, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – situation defused. Favonian (talk) 13:10, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Andrian Nurdianto (talk) 10:29, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Wrong language project, I guess... El_C 12:22, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Disruptive editing from unconfirmed users. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlexandraRock88900 (talkcontribs) El_C 12:24, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Who is this? El_C 12:23, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexandraRock88900 12:45, 26 April 2022 (UTC) protection.[reply]
Only admins can protect pages. Favonian (talk) 13:12, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Favonian (talk) 13:13, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've restored El C's original decline; the requester, while logged out, overwrote it with a fake protection notice. Jalen Folf (talk) 16:36, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Jalen Folf (talk) 16:36, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – British user keeps adding unsourced content and was repeatedly told to stop. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 14:18, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. via AIV. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:25, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 17:37, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Would this be a case of abuse of the page protection mechanism? My post has nothing to do with what CMD called "sockpuppetry" or whatever he/she calls it. But it was deleted (so as my edits to the article itself). He/she doesn't even allow people to talk at the talk page. 210.0.147.101 (talk) 14:26, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see a lot of unregistered sockpuppets on that talk page from the past 48h. Even if we assume (as we should) that you're not one of them, that doesn't mean the protection isn't justified since they are there. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 21:05, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No I am not. And I failed to see sockpuppetry there. Yes there are many non-registered editors but that isn't automatically the same thing as sockpuppetry. If this is not a case for RfPP, should this be brought to AN? Where would you suggest? 210.0.147.79 (talk) 09:25, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, it looks like you have been caught up in a page protection that was not intended to catch you, but nonetheless, is still necessary. I agree that, given the activity on that talk page and the fact that an individual has been using multiple IP addresses to circumvent a justly-placed block against them, unfortunately, we cannot have that talk page open for the time being. Don't worry, there is no rush, and if you have something important to contribute, you can just wait out the page protection. --Jayron32 11:42, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't observe there are any individuals who are using multiple IP addresses, but, rather, several individuals. (I myself am on dynamic addresses but that's within a very narrow band.)
In any case thank you for the reassurance that I am not banned from that article/talk page, and that my edits were alright. Please help communicate with those administrators that made the mistakes, and reinstate my edits and my talk page posts at once when that's settled. It's truly a matter of concern that there are so many of them who are not able to actually read and to tell when there are real and helpful contributions. Those who work in such a mechanical way shouldn't be given such powers and duties. 210.0.147.41 (talk) 12:40, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You're knowledge of the banned user in question is not relevant. They are there, they have been using that talk page in violation of their ban, and the protection was necessary to stop them. Other than your IP address, the other addresses being used on that talk page are all from known ranges, and the format and manner of the editing closely matches, the banned editor in question. This protection will not be undone for the time being. Please let the matter drop, you'll do nothing but waste your breath at this point. --Jayron32 13:07, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Protection is recent and justified by level of recent abuses. Jayron32 11:58, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Protecting admin note: If at first you don't succeed, WP:FORUMSHOP (ANI diff). El_C 14:03, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

27 April 2022

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Stidmatt (talk) 17:19, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Stidmatt, examples? El_C 00:54, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 17:29, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Primefac. Favonian (talk) 18:08, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Previous one-month protection evidently did not help much, article is still the target of a Brooklyn-based IP hopper. Long-term pending changes protection recommended. Skywatcher68 (talk) 18:18, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:29, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Asking for temporary page protection due to different IP users ongoing, disruptive editing. Sricsi (talk) 21:14, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Sricsi, examples? El_C 01:22, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – one day after the last protection expired, edit warring starts again... Mvbaron (talk) 09:48, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:40, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism from IP editor over last couple of months. Escape Orbit (Talk) 15:06, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:43, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There's an ongoing string of bizarre sockpuppet attacks on this page that keep adding the same line strange text. Not sure what's going on. PureRED | talk to me | 00:34, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. Ks0stm (TCGE) 00:45, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dove's talk (talk) 15:13, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 00:53, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Date of birth vandalism by IP and new user [110] [111] [112] [113]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:44, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 00:55, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism continues apace after a one-week semi expired last month. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 17:14, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 00:57, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Hesitated on asking for page protection earlier as the number of disruptive edits were relatively low even though they increased due to the 2022 invasion of Ukraine as the article covers a relevant topic. However, unsourced additions and edits contrary to existing consensuses and policies (e.g. WP:COMMONNAME consensus to use the name Transnistria) have spiked in the past 24 hours because of a recent attack on Transnistria's capital Tiraspol. One was made when I was in the middle of an edit a few minutes ago. I think some kind of temporary protection (for a week or two) would benefit this page by keeping out vandals, as well as (perhaps good faith?) anonymous and new editors who seem to be pushing a pro-Russia narrative or POV (in the example given, the IP editor says "vile nazis", a reference to Russian propaganda that Wikipedia is written in part by Nazis because it does not reflect a few specific positions of the Russian government). Another example was this revert to my revert: with the comment "Use your brains not Western propoganda". CentreLeftRight 19:03, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:28, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant attempts to direct readers to Reddit where they promote their phishing scam. Apparition11 Complaints/Mistakes 19:08, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:31, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qwerfjkltalk 21:12, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:35, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Same vandalism (naming him "Finger") from at least 5 IPs and 2 new-registered accounts (KidNamedFinger since Apr 21), multiple times over the past week or more. signed, Willondon (talk) 01:59, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection ought to be removed because the protection status is being misused to propagate a slander in the very first paragraph - and now that deliberate mischief cannot be corrected because of the protected status. This is grossly unfair.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajan Venkatesh (talkcontribs)

Maybe it’s there because it’s not damaging at all--CreecregofLife (talk) 18:55, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This page is protected as a discretionary page-level sanction under WP:Arbitration/Requests/Case/COVID-19. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 18:56, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Not happening. The OP's request just serves to prove the need for protection. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:05, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. ― Tartan357 Talk 22:37, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:40, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: For months, this article has been the victim of constant attempts by a block-evading editor (or editors) to make bizarre alterations to the content, and the Talk Page is bombarded with strange, irrelevant messages by those same accounts, many of which have already been removed. Pyrrho the Skipper (talk) 23:11, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:46, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. BilCat (talk) 00:48, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:51, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – WP:CURRENT. The article is being constantly edited and the situation is still developing. It has had two different IPs vandalize in the last half-hour of this report's filing alone. Painting17 (talk) 01:04, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator NinjaRobotPirateMelanieN (talk) 03:51, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption from proxy editors. --*Fehufangą✉ Talk page 01:29, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator NinjaRobotPirateMelanieN (talk) 03:53, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Independent business. 36.85.39.21 (talk) 23:12, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 03:47, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TestTube. 36.85.39.21 (talk) 23:39, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 03:48, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. same reason as French election above: constant addition of an unrelated PSA 💜  melecie  talk - 02:08, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator NinjaRobotPirateMelanieN (talk) 03:57, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There is a persistent amount of vandalism, mostly in the form of good faith edits regarding his name and pronouns. The majority of edits made in the last few months have either been reverted or done for the sole purpose of reverting another. I think either Semi-Protection or Pending Changes Protection would be helpful here. ChainSmoker82 (talk) 02:52, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:07, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism (likely Russian trolls), eg. depicted as part of Russia, used term "liberation of Ukraine" instead of "invasion of Ukraine" etc. PKleczek (talk) 04:28, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:11, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent low-level vandalism, as could be expected with a subject of this ilk and controversy level. Iskandar323 (talk) 07:27, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:59, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Don't know what's going on, but this article has been seeing very heavy vandalism (of the "is owned by" variety) for the last few hours. Meters (talk) 07:32, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:00, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 14:25, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I explained to them how they could lose TPA. Hopefully, they have stopped. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:40, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done for the bot, as they seem to have stopped for now. Ks0stm (TCGE) 05:27, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption by proxy. --*Fehufangą✉ Talk page 01:50, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Wizardman. Less Unless (talk) 10:28, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP Vandalism Gathunuku (talk) 09:06, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 09:23, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Page is the target of a long-running vandalism campaign triggered by the use of the name "Northern Ireland": [114] [115] [116] Zacwill (talk) 00:58, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 12:42, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing Tammbecktalk 08:06, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:13, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:13, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page has been semi-protected since 2009. It has been very little edited recently, apart from a brief flurry of minor edits by one user last month. The topic is not in the news. There is therefore no reason to expect any significant degree of vandalism. 2001:BB6:4713:4858:BCE7:78A9:F07F:E2FA (talk) 10:24, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Wizardman: protecting admin. — Maile (talk) 11:20, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected With deference to the protecting admin, it's been two days and they haven't responded, I unprotected the article. If it becomes a problem, we can always re-protect it again. 13 years is a very long time. Jayron32 12:34, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Less Unless (talk) 10:31, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. IP user (using different ips) keeps changing it to how they want it and putting things out of chronological order. RedPatch (talk) 10:34, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 13:16, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs FozzieHey (talk) 11:38, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 13:17, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from three newly registered since last weekend, falsifying the titles that were #1 during various weeks on this chart. (I do hesitate in requesting, given these are registered users and could do the same damage as autoconfirmed. At the very least, the two unblocked accounts in the recent page history should be blocked as vandalism-only accounts.). MPFitz1968 (talk) 02:02, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Another newly registered account has vandalized the same article since I filed this request, and I have started to suspect sockpuppetry when looking at the number of different accounts that have been doing the same at this and other related articles. I have filed a report at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lysimtmyblig. MPFitz1968 (talk) 06:18, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:36, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. partial blocks --Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:36, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Noting Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lysimtmyblig --Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:55, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 15:11, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: WP:ARBEE: People keep adding that Ukraine did this, based only on claims from Russian state media. Ukraine explicitly denies responsibility. ― Tartan357 Talk 04:42, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:15, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: WP:ARBEE --Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:15, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 15:11, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeat vandalism in the article. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 05:56, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:15, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Noting Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lysimtmyblig --Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:56, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 15:11, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The communism page is clearly being protected to keep its FAR LEFT bias. I always looked to Wiki as a source of non biased information. As a centrist it is very sad to see just how biased it has become.2600:387:F:4319:0:0:0:9 (talk) 10:50, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done If you have suggestions for improving the article, please make them on the article talk page. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:03, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism by Karim Maner. Shubham8763 (talk) 08:05, 27 April 2022 (UTC) Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.[reply]

User(s) blocked: Karim1275 (talk · contribs) blocked by Jayron32. They had been adding themselves as a spouse to multiple articles. Looks like normal childish vandalism to me. Jayron32 12:46, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 08:42, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There's maybe a dozen total edits to that article this year; hardly persistent. Jayron32 13:15, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. twotwofourtysix(My talk page and contributions) 11:45, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Jayron32 13:19, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated target of Cyberpunk2077JohnnySilverhand (talk · contribs) sockpuppets, virtually no legitimate edits otherwise being made to this obscure footballer stub. Lord Belbury (talk) 12:41, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. User(s) blocked.Jayron32 13:22, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: He is palestinian but has not expressed any point of view in the conflict. Unprotect NOW PLEASE Jishiboka1 (talk) 11:30, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected Most of the editing that led to the ECP were around the Arab-Israeli conflict; regardless of this person's personal views, the topic falls within the remit of WP:ARBPIA, and ECP is justified. Jayron32 12:37, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IPs with unsourced contents. Accireioj (talk) 08:11, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by Deepfriedokra Daniel Case (talk) 18:34, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 13:12, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:37, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Users without accounts repeatedly edit the article to describe Cardinal Marx as a heretic "former Cardinal.". LongIslandThomist914 (talk) 17:10, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: multiple accounts continue to remove sourced material that reflects negatively on a recently deceased person CovetJogs (talk) 17:35, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined per WP:BLPCRIME, it is generally improper to include material on accusations which don't result in convictions to such articles, and recently deceased persons still fall under the BLP remit. Please stop re-adding it. Jayron32 12:40, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
it did lead to a conviction CovetJogs (talk) 14:54, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't say that. It says he was arrested and charged. There's no information on any conviction. --Jayron32 18:41, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
obviously i am not using this OR to update the article, but here's a document finding him guilty. his supporters are arguing, without sources, that the case was dismissed. https://imgur.com/a/ZKJHtJU CovetJogs (talk) 20:18, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:21, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:21, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:21, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article has experienced immense vandalism in a 24-hour period. PerpetuityGrat (talk) 14:26, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Muboshgu. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:53, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Immense level of vandalism within the past 24 hours. PerpetuityGrat (talk) 14:45, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:52, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism TheManishPanwar (talk) 16:51, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism TheManishPanwar (talk) 16:51, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent blanking. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 17:46, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Being recreated by SPAs. Recommend ECP protection. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:52, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive editing AlbertCKM (talk) 20:45, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 20:29, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:23, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:23, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 20:30, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked 78.174.117.204 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) via WP:AIV already; there is a gap of no edits between today and 2022-01-22. I think this can be archived for now.
User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:20, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:20, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. BRDude70 (talk) 21:05, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:29, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

28 April 2022

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing vandalism recently coming from varied IP addresses. Geoff | Who, me? 13:48, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:06, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. lol1VNIO[not Lol1VNIO] (talk • contribs) 16:55, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. El_C 23:04, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism; wish we could protect all Drag Race tables for the same reason. --Another Believer (Talk) 17:01, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:02, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Persistent vandalism – A weird campaign to remove cited material from the article by several editors is starting to become tedious. This needs to be taken to the article's talk page, but they seem insistent on just removing content. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 22:04, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See https://twitter.com/UchePOkoye/status/1519275096912936960 for the source of the aggravation 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 22:20, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 22:59, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing by IP Jumper/Proxy. Similar case to 2022 French presidential election. --*Fehufangą✉ Talk page 23:04, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:09, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Several people (likely the same person using different IPs) have been making repeated efforts to add some un-encyclopedic material on the ethics of HEK 293 cells to this page. They run the gamut from irrelevant to the users beliefs on the ethics of immortalised cells to political (anti-abortion and vaccine) rhetoric. All of it has poorly written, misusing the syntax for linking pages and adding excessive links within the text of the article. Baneonplane (talk) 23:04, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:11, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Due to the subject getting arrested today, this article is a target of vandalism. One week should be enough. NASCARfan0548  23:05, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Hey, NASCARfan0548: pretty nuts, eh? El_C 23:14, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@El C Haha! Lol! You got me! NASCARfan0548  23:15, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent disruptions to lead, going on ever since the last PP expired. A perma/long-term semi is needed. Gotitbro (talk) 14:55, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 23:05, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:03, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs being used for vandalism. Wesoree (talk) 23:00, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 23:07, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vulgar ip hopper. $chnauzer 00:54, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator LuK3. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:35, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection - IP disruption.BabbaQ (talk) 00:06, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Extremely high IP vandalism. Anwegmann (talk) 00:56, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Star Mississippi. Ks0stm (TCGE) 03:46, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of the words "cope cage." https://twitter.com/KyleJGlen/status/1500902326126657537. Schierbecker (talk) 02:07, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This page is too active for pc at this time. El_C 03:37, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of vandalism reverts in the past month. I.hate.spam.mail.here (talk | contributions) 02:53, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 03:44, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of disruptive edits, including additions of unsourced and poorly-sourced WP:DOB from one IP who has been repeatedly warned. Beccaynr (talk) 03:24, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 03:37, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 00:21, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:58, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent alteration of release dates by IP without consensus. Blake Gripling (talk) 02:05, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs are adding unsourced content and not participating in talk discussion about production companies. Sariel Xilo (talk) 04:33, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to edit a part of the mathematics section for educational purposes and usage ONLY. I will NOT damage, remove, or anything of that sort to the page, and I lack animus intent towards doing such a thing. My goal for the edit is to help people's knowledge of math grow far beyond the horizon of what we already know. I would appreciate it if you would allow me to carry out my deed so I can support the educational systems and its work within the vast variety of mathematics. Thank you. 2603:9000:DE19:B2F4:B5BD:431B:D454:B6EF (talk) 23:01, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. You haven’t identified the article nor have you described the edit that you are requesting to be made in sufficient detail for someone to make it. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:32, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SSSB (talk) 06:28, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:43, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – subject has died. Tiagomagalhaes (talk) 11:54, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 12:21, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because I am understand to no longer vandalism on Wikipedia again . 2402:800:63B6:FEBF:7091:19BB:5316:AE62 (talk) 05:13, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Don't trust you. Favonian (talk) 09:04, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ECP: Upgrade from semi-protection to extended confirmed protection (under WP:ARBPIA). 142.112.224.146 (talk) 05:43, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would decline. The main focus of the article is not PIA, and, apart for a sock editing it two weeks ago, I do not see any disruption for the last couple of years (did not look for longer). Ymblanter (talk) 06:45, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Clearly part of ARBPIA; it's a paramilitary force taking an active role in the conflict. Prior disruption is not required, all ARBPIA topics are pre-emptively under ECP. Jayron32 13:42, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive edits by anonymous users. Itsquietuptown ✉️📜 10:48, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 13:45, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Reason: While I don't like requesting talk page protection, virtually all of the recent edits have been disruptive ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 15:52, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ianmacm, I agree it should be the exception, but also agree that there's too much graffiti right now. Bishonen | tålk 16:01, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent rehashing of the same points over and over again by single-purpose accounts. QueenofBithynia (talk) 10:19, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Declined It usually takes some fairly egregious disruption to lock down a talk page, even semiprotection, and I'm just not seeing it here. Yes, lots of noobs keep raising the same points, but it's not a disruption campaign, just annoying noobs being noobs. --Jayron32 13:38, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Couple of IP vandals. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:30, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 13:39, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of recent IP vandalism. Storchy (talk) 15:04, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:54, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Like the Utah Jazz article (see above), people keep adding misinformation that Jalen Brunson "owns" Utah Jazz. — Coolperson177 (t|c) 15:44, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:01, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Loafiewa (talk) 16:37, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:05, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ip address trying to evade blocking. Wesoree (talk) 14:36, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: some people are paid and try to spread false information as basically Sajad Gharibi Gozoo reach fame by spreading false information and fake photos that were photo-shopped . Wikinforg (talk) 14:43, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Wow. Once I reverted the negative, unsourced BLP, it was a puff piece. I tagged for G11. WOuld like second opinion on page protection. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:12, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I cleaned up the page move. The page is currently returned to Sajad Gharibi. -- zzuuzz (talk) 15:24, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: filer partial blocked by me. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:26, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:52, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 19:03, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 14:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:05, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: and all his spam deleted --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:05, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 19:03, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism. — Coolperson177 (t|c) 15:22, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:58, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: too much for the pending chngers. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:58, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 19:03, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Again, unsourced changes to nationality after previous protection expired. Mellk (talk) 18:04, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:07, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. FozzieHey (talk) 14:06, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 18:17, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long-term hijacking. Jalen Folf (talk) 18:04, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Favonian (talk) 18:16, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because whomever created the protection has an obvious bent against DrCampbell. This article is onesided and prejudiced against the subject. The article is libellous and there are inadequate references to support the theory against Dr Campbell Jtjohnston (talk) 21:41, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You haven’t indicated a reason for unprotection, and in fact reinforces the reason for protection. There is no theory against him. CreecregofLife (talk) 01:20, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time.. Incidentally, the OP is now auto-confirmed, has edited the article – and been reverted. Favonian (talk) 12:10, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: シャアリャ (talk) 13:19, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not all of us can read Japanese CreecregofLife (talk) 13:54, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Waga kamiyo --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:03, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I just realized that was even just the username and no reason was actually given... CreecregofLife (talk) 15:17, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 14:15, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Please apply protection to this page for the following reasons. Violation of neutral point of view , caste glorification, sources provide state something else and original research 2409:4071:219e:7448::e9e:b0b0 is a blocked IP Universallalal (talk) 16:09, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Thank you for watching the page, Universallalal. I've page-blocked the caste-glorifying IPv6 range. Bishonen | tålk 17:28, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant disruption going for the past few months. Semi protection should be put in place for a while. Gurkhazmi (talk) 17:13, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:59, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:29, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:56, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Ongoing anon. additions of unsourced content to a BLP Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 18:29, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:04, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Someone is trying to change Reed's position on the Packers. 68.234.69.27 (talk) 18:44, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Nthep (talk) 18:59, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A series of IPs from the British Isles have been adding unsourced durations since July 2021. It looks like they don't intend to stop. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 19:53, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:07, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

29 April 2022

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent spate of vandalism from anons. Anniversary of event is coming up - May 18th - so am requesting page protection until at least a week or so after May 18, 2022. Shearonink (talk) 14:15, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Seems a little premature. I blocked the most recent IP, but beyond those edits, there have been two bad IP edits since January. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:44, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. If it starts up again around May 18 I'll request again. The vandalism always peaks around the anniversary date.... Shearonink (talk) 14:47, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:22, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Increase Semi-protection to Extended GoAnimateFan2001 (talk) 19:11, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Nthep (talk) 19:13, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism of birthday 72.199.139.244 (talk) 20:10, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nthep (talk) 20:12, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection to this page “must” be removed so I can edit it and/or delete it. GoAnimateFan2001 (talk) 19:13, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Nthep (talk) 19:15, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism, potentially politically motovated Abcmaxx (talk) 19:27, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nthep (talk) 20:18, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Nthep: really? Because I see quite a lot of reverts in the last few days alone in the history Abcmaxx (talk)
There have been just four edits in the last week. The largest amount of disruptive activity was three weeks ago and that level hasn't been resumed since. I don't think that meets the requirement of "significant but temporary vandalism or disruption". Nthep (talk) 21:41, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism FFCETT77 (talk) 20:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Among Us vandalism. O.N.R. (talk) 23:38, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Long-standing COI vandalism, stretching back to April 2019 when "Hdhillon177" began to whitewash the page. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 14:24, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 21:56, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruption from IPs and unregistered users. KidAdSPEAK 18:26, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Frequent unsourced changes by IPs to a newly released film. Ab207 (talk) 20:05, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. MelanieN (talk) 22:09, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. A bit too much even with pending changes in effect. MPFitz1968 (talk) 21:11, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 01:12, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of adding unsourced content by IP hopper. BattleshipMan (talk) 22:09, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:28, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Jalen Folf (talk) 22:54, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 01:18, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Active harassment. Jalen Folf (talk) 23:14, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ks0stm (TCGE) 01:34, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template. Wrugtrab (talk) 00:32, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. Ks0stm (TCGE) 01:35, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An anonymous user, across several IPs, keeps changing the death tolls based on outdated sources. TornadoLGS (talk) 22:55, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs keep flipping the origin of the drink around. Maybe a long running protection can force all parties to discuss on the talk page if they are interested in pinning down the source, rather than nationalistic vandalism. – robertsky (talk) 08:31, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:29, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Financial ans other kinds of vandalism by IPs [117], [118], [[119]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:31, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:33, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page gets continuously vandalized and needs protection. There are more edits which consist of vandalism than actual content additions. Golem08 (talk) 09:03, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:35, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because I am understand to no longer vandalism on Wikipedia again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2402:800:63b6:febf:3c4c:4e09:ce6e:4c03 (talk) 04:52, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – and don't come back! (OP range-blocked.) Favonian (talk) 05:46, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Level of IP vandalism and sockpuppetry by the same person over sporadic periods of time, page was formerly protected as a result of this, I request the page to be protected again but extended confirmed permanently. Noorullah21 (talk) 02:41, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. bibliomaniac15 07:04, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Pending changes isn't really discouraging the vandalism plus it seems to have expired Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 04:31, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. bibliomaniac15 07:09, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Indeffed user talk page still attracting trolls/grave dancers. BilCat (talk) 05:13, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. bibliomaniac15 07:07, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. HurricaneEdgar 06:54, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. bibliomaniac15 07:09, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 07:27, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:27, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:27, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. NonsensicalSystem(error?)(.log) 09:54, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:11, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:11, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, since 17 April 2022. Kansas Bear (talk) 12:49, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:04, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unsourced changes to position by anonymous editor. Hunterb212 (talk) 03:10, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:27, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It's draft weekend, we're likely to see lots of this from clueless noobs. A week should be enough. Jayron32 13:58, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest adding adding the email address at WP:LIBEL to this page (at the "if there is libellious content about you" part). there should also be info about WP:VRT and account verification 67.21.154.193 (talk) 18:48, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is something that is probably best discussed on the talk page before any changes are made (and I can’t seem to find the "if there is libellious content about you" part). Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:22, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:26, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Could Michael J Savage be linked to Category:People from Benalla He was born in Tatong, which is a village within Benalla Rural City Council LGA. O'Connor B (talk) 02:20, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. It's not clear to me what specific edit you want to be made to the page. Noting also that Michael Joseph Savage is not protected (and already says he was born in Tatong). --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:15, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A high-profile Hindi movie that was released today; the article is getting a lot of vandalism and disruptive edits from IPs and new accounts. bonadea contributions talk 12:44, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 14:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: String of vandalism by unregistered users Khronicle I (talk) 14:34, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done by administrators Mjroots & Fences and windows. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:52, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism due to current events 87.244.71.238 (talk) 14:37, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done by administrators Mjroots & Fences and windows. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:53, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. DRYT.Motorsport (talk) 14:39, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done by administrators Mjroots & Fences and windows. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:53, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism 185.36.249.178 (talk) 14:40, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

With a quickness, please. Bring your revdel. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:41, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done by administrators Mjroots & Fences and windows. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:53, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Significant levels of vandalism, in the last day, owing to allegations made surrounding the Member of Parliament for Tiverton and Honiton's conduct in the UK's House of Commons.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-61276319 Mdeuk (talk) 14:42, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done by administrators Mjroots & Fences and windows. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:54, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant stream of drive-by vandalism as Parish is top of the news at the moment. Vandals working quicker than the Undo link can handle. Ralph Corderoy (talk) 14:42, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done by administrators Mjroots & Fences and windows. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:54, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The ongoing damage to wiki pages by Chinese users and the dispute between Koreans and Chinese in editing the documents. (In addition, content related to Koreanic (as claimed by Vovin, Unger, Whitman, Kim Bang-han, Kazuo, etc.) should be added to the paragraph related to the language system of Buyeo language in the document) 211.230.224.218 (talk) 04:04, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. IP, all I see is you making a typo, which I just undid (diff). Not sure why you expect outside reviewers to understand the rest on the basis of this request summary alone. Like, "Chinese users," what? Or, "document," what document? And so on. Last edit by a human to Talk:Buyeo was Feb, so that's not a good sign. El_C 12:44, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Not sure what happened over the past couple days, but it looks like someone kicked a hornet's nest. Any chance for 3 or so days of semi to see if it calms down?. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:26, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:11, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Visible Music College (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Recently featured in several high publicity news articles regarding accusations of a sexual assault cover-up. 2607:EA00:107:2007:2CD5:7C0A:FB55:1C07 (talk) 15:30, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. MPFitz1968 (talk) 11:25, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. User(s) blocked: Uhbgtuj (talk · contribs) blocked by Deepfriedokra. Jayron32 13:53, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing unconstructive edits coming from IP user(s). Geoff | Who, me? 12:20, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 24.17.39.88 (talk · contribs). Jayron32 13:56, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 14:58, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also might do to protect the Tiverton and Horniton page as well. That's seeing a bit as well. Both of these are related to the Neil Parish stuff above. (Which is a new record for the most protection requests I've seen for a page at one time) Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 15:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:06, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:08, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
other one protected by Malcolmxl5 --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:10, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:12, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Too tempting a target!. Rathfelder (talk) 16:29, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected.. Already protected for one month. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:32, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. I assume this to be a request for protection placed in the wrong section. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:42, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Cyberpunk2077JohnnySilverhand (talk · contribs) vandalism resuming after previous block expiration. Lord Belbury (talk) 13:45, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: CKWTenOutstandingYoungPersons (talk · contribs) blocked by Ferret. Jayron32 14:03, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Multiple IP and new user vandals on a page created yesterday, due to politicized nature of an agency department fighting disinformation. Probably only needs short-term semi-protection until 'Ministry of Truth' rhetoric dies down a bit. Bakkster Man (talk) 14:21, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted 3 additional IP editors problematic edits since this report was made. Bakkster Man (talk) 15:13, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
THere's also a report at WP:EFFP relating to this page (which of course is vandalism). ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:18, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Deepfriedokra, could you take a look at this one? It's receiving a boatload of disruption. Endwise (talk) 16:41, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ya this desperately needs protection. Would an admin please take a look at this? ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:21, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:25, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The reason is I wanted someone to move this page to Vegetable burger (which doesn't exist) and, before I want someone to move the page, I preferred to start an RFC, at the ECON topic. 99.33.117.186 (talk) 01:28, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. It's not clear to me what specific edit you want to be made to the page. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done: page move requests should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves. @Malcolmxl5: they were requesting to move the page. —interstatefive  (talk) - just another roadgeek 14:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - SUN EYE 1 16:44, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:32, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – high level of IP vandalism. Washing Machine (alt) (talk) 17:57, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:30, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – The IP ranges are too large to request a rangeblock. (CC) Tbhotch 18:17, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:29, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Dynamic IP. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:41, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:38, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Unsourced changes by IPs/new users resumed immediately after the last protection expired. Ab207 (talk) 15:42, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:37, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – high level of IP vandalism. Storchy (talk) 16:39, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. as arbitration enforcement--Ymblanter (talk) 18:34, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer needed because the statements used in the content is full of misinformation and probably written by a terrorist group that is trying to blame its own atrocities' on a group trying to defend the Amhara people which is mainly a Christian population targeted for ethnic cleansing by TPLF , OLA and Muslim Terrorists. Reading the statement portrays as if the Jews are the one that caused the holocaust. 196.188.49.206 (talk) 16:41, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Editing of the page is restricted to registered users with at least 30 days' tenure and 500 edits as the result of arbitration enforcement (WP:ARBHOA). Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:58, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:14, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: What is written about Fano is false and it is written by its enemies. 162.1.159.86 (talk) 16:58, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Editing of the page is restricted to registered users with at least 30 days' tenure and 500 edits as the result of arbitration enforcement (WP:ARBHOA). --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:14, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There are many information missing in this description. The protection must be removed to add more detail and correct some misinformation. 2607:FEA8:BCE0:9110:B401:2922:2FF6:C905 (talk) 18:13, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Editing of the page is restricted to registered users with at least 30 days' tenure and 500 edits as the result of arbitration enforcement (WP:ARBHOA). Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:15, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Why the heck was this requested twice on a single page? CreecregofLife (talk) 18:37, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Is this a rhetorical question?? Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:13, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:14, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. aboideautalk to me! 19:52, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

+1 ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:55, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Widr. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs are repeatedly making unconstructive edits over a period of about 20 hours. Gummycow moomilk 20:37, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Recent increase in addition of unsourced and possibly false information Isabelle 🏳‍🌈 20:50, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Blablubbs (talk) 20:54, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

30 April 2022

Reason: Persistent vandalism – mostly from unregistered IP-contributors, which has been ongoing since at least December 2021 nearly weekly. 84.250.14.116 (talk) 15:54, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.  MelanieN (talk) 22:59, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Recent vandalism and unsourced additions from multiple different IPs. FozzieHey (talk) 21:19, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See page history. Vandalism by multiple IPs in the past 2 weeks. — B. L. I. R. 21:42, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from IP hopper. MrOllie (talk) 22:23, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:03, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from IP hopper, resumed immediately after last protection expired. MrOllie (talk) 22:24, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:05, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Lots of recent attempts by IPs to insert information about sexual harassment allegations made against Laurent Elriani, who is not the same person. edit, clarification: Laurent is Linda's husband; still not sure it's appropriate to put allegations against Him in article about Her?? Elemimele (talk) 22:37, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended-confirmed protection: Edit warring / content dispute. Requesting temporary extended-confirmed protection pending conflict of interest noticeboard consensus regarding alleged conflict of interest by an editor who has contributed majorly in this article, see WP:COIN#Gömböc for the COI report. The accused and other editors have been engaged in longer-lasting content disputes/edit wars per the report specific above. Protection should not be necessary for a long time, only for a limited period pending the result of the report to prevent further edit warring or abuse. ★Ama TALK CONTRIBS 15:37, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notified: WP:COIN#Gömböc. ~~~~
★Ama TALK CONTRIBS 19:26, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The edit warring seems to have stopped several days ago. MelanieN (talk) 22:46, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism of page 9221sam (talk) 00:18, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator OhnoitsjamieMelanieN (talk) 02:41, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. AbelAndCain (talk) 02:46, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:50, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
YArnold2923 (talk) 13:20, 29 April 2022 (UTC)Can I Become A Host[reply]
@YArnold2923. Hello YArnold2923, this is the place to ask for a specific edit to a protected page. I don't know what you are asking for. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:35, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@YArnold2923. Drop me a line on my user talk page or at the Teahouse if you need some help. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:42, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:43, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Too much IP joke edits. Please semi-protect for 12 hours. bender235 (talk) 00:23, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. MelanieN (talk) 02:43, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 00:46, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 02:46, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Some editor keep adding unsourced or poorly sourced content in the article. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 02:04, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:53, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism. Rathfelder (talk) 20:51, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. per THIS and THIS and THIS, I have indefinitely partial blocked Ariana Williscroft (talk · contribs) --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:59, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Deepfriedokra. Do we need to bump up protection to ECP for a while? Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:00, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see more vandalism right now, but have not checked every edit. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I fail to see how established users ca behave in this manner. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
U.K. politics is a little feverish at the moment - it must be the fine weather, we Brits are not used to it! Not an excuse for such behaviour, of course. Let's keep an eye on things. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:09, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:05, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Bloody Hell --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:05, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 07:42, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism (even after the page was protected a few weeks ago). I propose indefinite pending-changes, but you can make your decision. Enderman123456789 (talk) 05:16, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 07:03, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The same anonymous vandal from before has returned. Another user and I have both had to revert their vandalism already. Protection was granted before, but only for a couple of days, and now the same vandal has returned less than nine days after the protection was removed. VictimOfEntropy (talk) 05:39, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 06:58, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Sigh - being harassed by IPs again, would like a month of peace please. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:51, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Geraldo Perez: your talk page is already protected. Enderman123456789 (talk) 05:59, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Happy to assist. Get some sleep. You look tired. Don't be shy about approaching me directly with such requests. BusterD (talk) 06:04, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Storchy (talk) 04:44, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Storchy: Seconded; there are at least twenty reverts in the past three days. Enderman123456789 (talk) 05:43, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Less Unless. Favonian (talk) 07:48, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection or indefinite pending-changes-protection: Recent vandalism, plus it has been semi-protected six times in the past (including once this year), which is enough. Enderman123456789 (talk) 05:40, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Tasmanianisation (talk · contribs) blocked by Cullen328. BusterD (talk) 05:46, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Infinite move protection: No reason to be moved, in line with most other country articles (the remaining should be move protected as well). Enderman123456789 (talk) 05:48, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. BusterD (talk) 06:55, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Adnan.zaki.m (talk) 03:36, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Adnan.zaki.m: you need to specify the page you want protected in both the title and in the "pagelinks" section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enderman123456789 (talkcontribs) 05:42, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined for lack of information. Favonian (talk) 07:51, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Currently has pending changes protection, but as this is a disambiguation page and unlikely to need frequent updates, suggest longer-term semi-protection. — Manticore 07:12, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Specifically, 2603:7000:c53d:c27d::/64 for a month. Favonian (talk) 08:05, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Disruptive/unsourced changes by IPs resumed immediately after the last protection expired. Ab207 (talk) 12:11, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:29, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Increased trolling from https://www.reddit.com/r/IndiaSpeaks/comments/uf4ay2/wikipedias_intresting_take_on_the_kashmir_filesDaxServer (t · m · c) 12:11, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not again (again). El_C 12:26, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Will120 (talk) 03:01, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:11, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – See page history. Addition of unsourced content or incorrect information by multiple IPs and a blocked user. — B. L. I. R. 06:26, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:13, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – This individual has suddenly become a political lightning rod. soibangla (talk) 11:18, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:18, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article and its talk page have been subject to LTA since December 2021. Some Istanbul IPs have been on a mission to fill the article with conspiracy theory nonsense. From February until April, the article was silverlocked because of this. When the silverlocking ended in early April, the LTA immediately restarted. Therefore, I request permanent silverlocking for the article and its talk page. Best regards, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 12:08, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:24, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Veracious ^(•‿•)^ 13:10, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:28, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:17, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:29, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent adding of Linkspam. Davidelit (Talk) 13:24, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:30, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism edits by varied users within the last 3+ hours (7 IPs and 1 account, in 10 edits, so far -> 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10) – 2804:F14:C060:8A01:E11F:9193:92A6:441B (talk) 13:49, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:31, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Thibodeaux is getting a position switch with the NY Giants. I cited a source to backup the position change. 68.234.69.27 (talk) 04:48, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: 68.234.69.27, seems like you posted this in the wrong namespace. Your reason to protect the article does not make sense. — B. L. I. R. 06:39, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. This does not appear to be a request for protection (as an aside, the OP has made a sourced edit to the page and it remains there). Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:04, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. multiple IPs and new or basically-new accounts keep re-adding the same material without RS. No attempt has been made to discuss at Talk. Material in question presumably falls under WP:AMPOL Pinchme123 (talk) 07:00, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The article is too heavily edited for PC protection to be effective. MelanieN (talk) 15:16, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection High level of recurring IP vandalism. Note: most of the last 100 edits are vandalism (presumably by the same person) and reverts. Andra Febrian (talk) 07:47, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 15:20, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of Rajput dynasties

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because there is no apparent vandalism from autoconfirmed accounts from several weeks/months now, neither there are edit requests. I request a admin to remove the protection from the article so that everyone can contribute and If disruption starts again U can restore the protection. Thanks. 2402:8100:2182:5B7D:DFE7:B68:A731:562F (talk) 11:53, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This page is protected as a community-authorised discretionary sanction per WP:GS/CASTE. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 11:56, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected – per Jéské Couriano's observation. Good to see that protection works as intended. Favonian (talk) 12:00, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article and its talk page have been subject to LTA since December 2021. Some Istanbul IPs have been on a mission to fill the article with conspiracy theory nonsense. From February until April, the article was silverlocked because of this. When the silverlocking ended yesterday, the LTA immediately restarted. Therefore, I request permanent silverlocking for the article and its talk page. Best regards, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 12:08, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 15:38, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. -- EN-Jungwon 15:27, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:34, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to make an edit on Steve Down Background information and add more of his ventures. Thank you. Musyimi s (talk) 23:10, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Musyimi s, the page is not protected. However, given the edits that you have made, you should discuss the changes you want to make on the article talk page. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:35, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done – Please use an edit request at Talk:Steve Down to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian (talk) 12:41, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Hi level of IP vandalism Khawarjunjoi2 (talk) 11:42, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:21, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Last edit was 2022-01-30T00:09:41 by a (now blocked) spammer --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:21, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 18:04, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP editor repeatedly adding repetitive threatening text Elemimele (talk) 13:12, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Less Unless (talk) 13:43, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism and nonconstructive edits occur on a frequent basis, often with misleading edit summaries. I count a dozen separate instances of vandalism in the last two months, all but one of which were by IP editors. The rate seems to have increased since the Epic Rap Battles of History episode featuring Mansa Musa came out last November. I think semi-protection may be merited. Ornithopsis (talk) 16:29, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: The lack of understanding of wiki policies on the part of a user is making it a non notable topic. They are consistently putting tags and doing disruptive editing on a number of articles. Recently, they have nominated an article for deletion without going through WP: BEFORE and may do the same here. Meanwhile, the discussion on their conduct is going on at WP:ANI#Zamindars of Bihar, unreliable source. Hence, in order to avoid disruption till then it should be protected. Heba Aisha (talk) 06:26, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. I have placed a note on the other user's talk page asking them to discuss the issue at the article talk page. MelanieN (talk) 15:12, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection High level of recurring IP vandalism. Note: most of the last 50 edits are vandalism (presumably by the same person) and reverts. Andra Febrian (talk) 07:47, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:26, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Messing up article by a registered user by ChambeChambeBoy. Please protect the article. 120.29.76.251 (talk) 08:45, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. The user you name has been blocked as a sockpuppet, and I don't see other disruption. MelanieN (talk) 15:24, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 16:36, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, thanks. 𝕸𝖗 𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖙𝖑𝖊 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 (talk) 17:14, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Sdrqaz. Favonian (talk) 17:45, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP users made an edit of remove on pictures and Article of Goni with other image and articles of another typhoons. Haikou22 (talk) 13:26, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 15:40, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive IP editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:12, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. WP:partial block WP:rangeblock --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:30, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
almost forgot. /24 --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:31, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Special:Contributions/71.183.16.202 has an acknowledged COI. They are, or claim to be, the subject of the article. They are edit warring to remove content that appears reliably sourced. A pblock could also work. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:43, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:10, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism by IP users.ZZSWKX (talk) 16:17, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:32, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Resumption of disruptive editing by IP after lift of page protection. Mutt Lunker (talk) 16:37, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. Pending Change protection is now in effect. MelanieN (talk) 19:35, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP editor keeps re-adding false cast info. The page was protected for a short while about a week ago, and as soon as it expired, the vandalism returned. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 16:51, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:40, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mellk (talk) 17:27, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:42, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Tommi1986 let's talk! 20:10, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:41, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – repeated name changing today by multiple accounts. MB 21:31, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:42, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 21:42, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — TNT (talk • she/her) 21:44, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]