This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject AfroCreatives, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of AfroCreatives articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfroCreativesWikipedia:WikiProject AfroCreativesTemplate:WikiProject AfroCreativesAfroCreatives articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2022, when it received 11,710,910 views.
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report6 times. The weeks in which this happened:
Regarding this, I actually think @Señor Keesh may be right here. The first sentence of the lead links to the comics character on whom the film/series is based, and in this case it is indeed Shuri and not T'Challa. Black Panther (character) only discusses T'Challa, not all incarnations of the character. InfiniteNexus (talk) 00:31, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The credits should still hold some weight here, as it only says Based on the Marvel Comics. This is clearly titled "Black Panther". I think we should transition to the wording of based on the Marvel Comics featuring the character Black Panther or ... featuring the character Shuri / Black Panther. Simply saying it is based on Shuri is not in fact true, as it is based on the comics Shuri and the Black Panther are featured in. Trailblazer101 (talk) 00:39, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Shuri was also known as the Black Panther in the comics. The lead should say featuring the character [[Shuri (character)|Shuri / Black Panther]]. The infobox should of course stay the same, per the credits. InfiniteNexus (talk) 00:43, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I hadn't realized that the lead currently says based on the Marvel Comics character. Yeah, that's definitely not right, per the previous discussions since the credits say Based on the Marvel Comics the lead should use based on Marvel Comics featuring the character. I'll adjust it. InfiniteNexus (talk) 01:01, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question: I don't quite understand. Do you mean that the citations should be updated? Usually, when citations are used across multiple articles, the "accessed on XYZ" field does not automatically get updated. That's also important because what it actually says at that link can change, so it is correct for the citation to refer to a date in the past here. Actualcpscm (talk) 17:14, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The access date should be the most recent date the citation was accessed, and the information in the article reflects the citation. It should be updated to today's date whenever the information is updated using it. Thanks, Indagate (talk) 17:26, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As per WP:CITEWEB and the "Links and ID numbers" subsection further down on that page, the "accessed" field corresponds to "the date you retrieved (or accessed) the web page". Its inclusion is relevant "in case the web page changes in the future", which means that it's relevant to the specific use of the source. As far as I would interpret this, it's quite clear that the "accessed" field should not be universally updated across different articles whenever a source is accessed. It's quite important that it is not, since different articles might refer to different parts of the cited source, which might change at different times. I am not aware of any effort whatsoever to implement a universal synchronisation of the "accessed" field for identical citations in different articles, as it would defeat the very purpose of giving this information. Actualcpscm (talk) 17:38, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Of course, if it is accessed again and the article is updated in accordance with the new information, then it should be updated. The original request did not indicate that that was the case, they linked to the edit history of a different article. Actualcpscm (talk) 17:39, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
Question: I don't quite understand. Do you mean that the citations should be updated? Usually, when citations are used across multiple articles, the "accessed on XYZ" field does not automatically get updated. That's also important because what it actually says at that link can change, so it is correct for the citation to refer to a date in the past here. Actualcpscm (talk) 17:14, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Not done: this is not the right page to request additional user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone may add them for you, or if you have an account, you can wait until you are autoconfirmed and edit the page yourself. M.Bitton (talk) 15:28, 1 May 2023 (UTC)