Talk:Jurassic World Dominion

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jurassic World Dominion article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Film: British / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

United States: Cinema Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Miniapolis, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on October 12, 2022.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 3 times. The weeks in which this happened:

Archives

1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 7 sections are present.

Dimetrodon, Triassic Therapod

"Dimetrodon, a synapsid that existed before the dinosaurs, also appears in the film. The creature had made appearances through various franchise merchandise over the years, while Dominion marks its film debut."

There were a cluster of Dimetrodon in Journey to the Center of the Earth (1959). WHPratt (talk) 03:35, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Plot: "The explorers eventually come upon a subterranean ocean. They construct a raft to cross it, but not before narrowly escaping a family of dimetrodons."

Production: "The giant Dimetrodon depicted at the center of the Earth action sequence were actually rhinoceros iguanas with large, glued-on make-up appliances added to their backs."

Journey to the Center of the Earth (1959 film) WHPratt (talk) 01:19, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Editing dispute over box office results

Few editors have been changing box office numbers on that movie to vastly different numbers. I don't like where this is going. BattleshipMan (talk) 01:40, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ok 66.206.60.235 (talk) 21:23, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

About the billion dollar mark.

So basically, looks like Dominion got 999.7 million dollars, and if it true, then it could be the third film to reach a billion dollar mark during the pandemic. Stephenfisher2001 (talk) 03:55, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is this an epic film?

No, the runtime 146 minutes had nothing to do with the epic film, but it had multiple locations, and places that the characters were involved. Should I added it, or it does not? Stephenfisher2001 (talk) 20:45, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We should follow WP:FILMLEAD, "Genre classifications should comply with WP:WEIGHT and represent what is specified by a majority of mainstream reliable sources." If "epic" is not used by most reliable sources, then we should not have that in the first sentence. I don't really think "epic" is commonly used in the sources. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 20:50, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

BattleshipMan corrected me on removing capitals from dinosaur genuses; that was fine, and appreciated. What wasn't appreciated was their mindless revert of a painstaking plot copyedit (bringing it under 700 words, per WP:FILMPLOT) for no reason other than WP:IDONTLIKEIT. NeoBatfreak, I'm done with your requested copyedit; sorry. Miniapolis 01:35, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Audience scores not normally included

Please note that WP:UGC user generated content such as from user voted web polls are not a reliable source and are not normally included in Wikipedia articles (with a few rare exceptions).

Audience scores should not have been added to the article[1] without any discussion. This should be removed unless and until it is shown by reliable sources that there is something particularly noteworthy about the audience scores in this case to justify making an exception to the rule. -- 109.77.205.15 (talk) 03:16, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, removed. Thanks, Indagate (talk) 09:35, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Actors in the lead part of the article

I do not agree with the past discussion regarding of which actors would be put on the lead part of the article, which I was ~~not~~ involved in. I think anyone who appeared in the previous Jurassic World films that are not in the poster billing board and any one who are such importance (like Campbell Scott's character Dodgson, who is the main antagonist in that movie) should be on the lead part of the article. BattleshipMan (talk) 03:44, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Um, you literally were? I guess it works, depends if I like it or not. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:17, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, wrong section I looked at. Well, I wasn't sure about it at the time. I think maybe we should only put up actors who appeared in the previous Jurassic World films, as well as the one who played the main antagonist on it, if you know what I mean. BattleshipMan (talk) 04:25, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should look at these things from a real-world perspective. If he isn't credited in the billing block, there are reasons for that which are beyond our control (i.e. contracts, star power, etc.) We shouldn't be arbitrarily deciding to give someone the top-billing credit "they deserve" — the next thing we know, editors will be demanding that Batman (1989 film) put Michael Keaton in his "rightful" place in the lead and infobox, and so forth. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:55, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Budget

Preemptively posting here that the budget has increased thanks to the latest UK Gov tax release. I added the numbers in that document to the numbers Caroline Reid provided in previous tax releases. This falls under WP:CALC. poketape (talk) 05:03, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]