User talk:Mvqr

Archives

Suggestion

Your user page reads "I am interesting in many things". That could be correct, referring to your abilities in lots of activities but I think you meant "I am interested in many things". Maybe I'm wrong though. Thanks for reverting vandalism, as well. ButterCashier (talk) 12:16, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, my user page is woefully out of date, I made it as part of a formatting tutorial. I'll give it a more substantial update. Mvqr (talk) 12:18, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please help update the list of serial killer by country

I have updated in the talk section and provided selected source. Veritas.Et.Verus (talk) 13:00, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I replied at the article. Mvqr (talk) 11:10, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2023 Dadeville shooting for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2023 Dadeville shooting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 Dadeville shooting until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Thebiguglyalien (talk) 14:20, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Jonathan Jacob Meijer

On 9 May 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jonathan Jacob Meijer, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a court ordered Jonathan Jacob Meijer to stop donating sperm or pay a €100,000 fine per donation? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jonathan Jacob Meijer. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Jonathan Jacob Meijer), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 00:03, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 9,278 views (773.2 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of May 2023 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

firefly ( t · c ) 18:56, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not using multiple accounts, but appealing a CU block by a sitting Arb is a waste of time. Toodles! Mvqr (talk) 11:34, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]