Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2016/06

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2016

01 June 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Ongoing IP vandalism. First bout of vandalism from similar IP in January and early May. One-week temp semi-protection expired May 26 with vandalism continuing since. Suggest at least two weeks if not a month this time around. Kingofaces43 (talk) 22:37, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 21:31, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Snuggums (talk / edits) 15:58, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 20:10, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vensco (T | C) 19:18, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:30, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Mutiple new accounts and an IP have been attempting to add copyrighted, non-neutral content to the article. One account, User:HFUniversity, has already been blocked. Undaunted, an IP began adding enormous quantities of copyrighted, non-neutral text taken directly from the organization's websites. See example version. I communicated to the talk page of that IP what they were doing wrong (see User talk:24.48.232.155), and reverted. They ignored it, and are attempting to re-add the via another new account [1]. All attempts at communication with this person have failed. Requesting temporary semi-protection to halt this problem. --Hammersoft (talk) 16:09, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I also blocked the registered sock. Katietalk 18:20, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Large amount of recent vandalism (including blanking) and disruptive editing. Funcrunch (talk) 16:33, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:07, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent vandalism by IPs and new accounts. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:45, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:05, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Obvious and confirmed sock is continuing to file trolling unblock requests. Please restrict talk page access. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:57, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Widr (talk) 19:05, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Uncited plot summary. ViperSnake151  Talk  00:25, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 18:16, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Constant vandalism of statistics section by user with varying IP addresses. VG31-irl 13:51, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My request was not denied, I was asked to choose between semi-protection and pending changes but my request was deleted without the page being protected. VG31-irl 14:44, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 18:14, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism. This is the third time the IP has come back after being blocked. Temporary protection or another block is not going to work. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:12, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Widr. Katietalk 18:15, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: A recent interview with an expert in theoretical physics has resulted in a news spike and a series of anonymous editors attempting to use the interview to WP:LABEL a U.S. presidential candidate as a demagogue. Requesting about a week of semi-protection to allow the current frenzy to die down. --Allen3 talk 16:22, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:46, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Recent uptick in vandalism, particularly from various IPs. Dl2000 (talk) 02:15, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:35, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent addition of Hoaxes as IP Sock of User:Bertrand101. LG-Gunther :  Talk  02:34, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And the IPs are blocked. Lectonar (talk) 12:25, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vensco (T | C) 15:45, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Malcolmxl5.. PC1 applied for one month. P.S. I'm keeping a eye on this one. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:02, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Please semi-protect this page for as long as possible. I am absolutely fed up with the ridiculous hoaxes perpetrated by IP users here. (A registered user previously involved in the dispute has now agreed with my reasoning per the talk page discussion, but the IP users show no sign of stopping nor discussing.). Mdrnpndr (talk) 02:39, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected 126 transclusions. Katietalk 14:06, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection or pending changes: High level of IP vandalism after old semi-protection expired. Ebyabe talk - State of the Union08:17, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last protection expired May 7th. Lectonar (talk) 09:18, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection or pending changes: Persistent vandalism by Hammad.511234, since last couple of days the user is keen to add his/her theories as the final truth on the subject, invited the user on talk page, he/she is still not ceasing it. Barthateslisa (talk) 09:05, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The user is autoconfirmed, so neither would be effective. Seems to be a slow edit war, so try this. Lectonar (talk) 09:13, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection A wave of IP vandalism has cropped up over the last couple of days (10 vandalizing IP edits on May 31st and June 1st so far), no doubt timed alongside the increased profile of the team for the forthcoming Euro 2016 European Football Championships. Semi protection for the duration of the championships would be great - 6 weeks would suffice? Super Nintendo Chalmers (talk) 12:02, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 14:04, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent sockpuppetry. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 13:08, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 14:03, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. 117Avenue (talk) 04:07, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:22, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: More than one month of various IPs and new accounts adding variations of "Just like his father but bolder." Probably related to the long string of vandalism to his father's article Alexander Hamilton that led to protection. Meters (talk) 04:51, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:24, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Content dispute causing unnecessary disruption and edit warring, with neither faction willing to engage in consensus-building. Keri (talk) 12:32, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ok, after some watching of the article, the talk-page, and the involved users talkpages, I agree that a time-out would be beneficial. All involved are invited to use the articles talk-page to its full possibilities. Lectonar (talk) 12:54, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nairspecht Converse 08:34, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:53, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP and new user continuously removing content. —IB [ Poke ] 09:25, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:53, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: The article is currently experiencing a content dispute about frivolous matters. Maybe a protection template is needed to heed the editors.Imeldific (talk) 12:01, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This seems to be a brewing edit-war; use the article's talkpage to hash it out. Lectonar (talk) 07:54, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High levels of IP vandalism since becoming a daily featured article. Spilia4 (talk) 14:22, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Sorry for the late reaction, but it seems to have died down now; please relist if necessary. Lectonar (talk) 07:56, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Following a recent blocking of a group of socks, new editor appeared making similar edits; likely continued socking. Nat Gertler (talk) 15:19, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Just one edit in the vein of the above; please use AIV or such, protection would be overkill right now. Lectonar (talk) 07:57, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content by way of IP's and other anonymous editors, as well as information that violates the terms of the MoS for television and WP:TVOVERVIEW/WP:TVUPCOMING. livelikemusic talk! 02:12, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:46, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vensco (T | C) 04:44, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:55, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – History of on-going addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content by non-autoconfirmed members. livelikemusic talk! 00:12, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:34, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism after old semi-protection expired. Ebyabe talk - State of the Union08:17, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of another month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:16, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism from a longtime IP sock vandal. See this and this for more information. Consider also temporarily protecting the other pages they are currently vandalizing with the IP they are currently using. Although, that won't do much. The person needs to be stopped. Until they are, they will carry on with this, like they have been for at least two years now, for the foreseeable future. I do not have any knowledge on how one stops IPs; the only thing I know of is range blocks but I don't actually know what that is. —DangerousJXD (talk) 08:37, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:15, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism/blanking from Oct 2015, Dec 2015, Feb 2016, March 2016, May 2016, June 2016. Problem editors have included several registered and multiple IP editors so this will be hard to address by other means. – Brianhe (talk) 11:35, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. this is too slow for semi-protection; I have implemented pending-changes and watchlisted. Let's see how this works out. Lectonar (talk) 11:37, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP and throwaway account vandalism appears to have resumed. Subject (deceased) is in news following official military documents indicating that his autobiography and movie based on it grossly exaggerate his medal count and other exploits. Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz (talk) 18:50, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Updated to include second page - IP sockpuppet/meatpuppet at IP 108.34.150.59 is spreading their misbehavior. Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz (talk) 04:11, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:41, 1 June 2016 (UTC
Chris Kyle Semi-protected for 1 year, American Sniper (book) Semi-protected for 6 months both by EdJohnston. tutterMouse (talk) 07:00, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 22:27, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The redirect. Lectonar (talk) 09:09, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated by IP socks of User:Roi Casilana. Sixth of March 22:57, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected by GB fan for one year. tutterMouse (talk) 07:01, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP hopper is posting crap on my User talk. Kautilya3 (talk) 00:10, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:08, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism from people with opposing political views. Constantly changing the ideology section to "extreme right wing" when the party is centralist. S.Staines (talk) 11:44, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Lectonar (talk) 20:09, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP editors adding unconfirmed trade rumours to page. Trut-h-urts man (TC) 21:11, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Braves have confirmed. Katietalk 02:21, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Since May last year the article's been recreated and deleted 5 times most by socks so stop the stupid cycle I'm filing this, Cheers,. –Davey2010Talk 22:17, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done - Indeffed by Ponyo. –Davey2010Talk 22:53, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing vandalism over the past two weeks. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:01, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 02:24, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated namecrufting, some derogatory in nature, for a few weeks by shifting IPs. Not the school's IP either. . John from Idegon (talk) 01:23, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 02:30, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:37, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 02:25, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection and pending changes: Constant vandalism of statistics section by user with varying IP addresses. VG31-irl 14:35, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done One or the other, not both. Decide. Katietalk 20:59, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi protection then, but put it on for a few months as on other articles once the protection expires this user starts vandalising it again. Thanks, VG31-irl 21:24, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 15:09, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Seems to have stopped; if it resumes, let us know. Katietalk 21:01, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Professor Van Leer's wiki page got falsely edited persistently by several different IP addresses, for example, untrue life events got added and copyrighted picture from Professor Van Leer used without consent. The semi-protection could help make sure his wiki page content stays true and complies with Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy, Dkaihua (talk) 20:04, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 20:11, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

02 June 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP that is jumping from IP to IP continues to add info about a fan film, vandalising page. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:59, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 19:24, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Multi-vector vandalism from a series of IPs and new accounts over the last two days, attempting to force some supposed fascination with feet onto the article. --Hammersoft (talk) 19:31, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 20:01, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This is what happens when you unprotect this article - videogaming basement dwellers come back to vandalize the list - so therefore I request to extend the page protection for an extended period. Donnie Park (talk) 20:08, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 20:11, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry from Supreme Genghis Khan socks. TheCoffeeAddict talk|contribs 06:13, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 13:28, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IP's for the past 3 weeks. Most of the changes are about the President-elect where these IP's make him already an Incumbent President though he's not yet assumed office. SkyHigher (talk) 10:25, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  18:22, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The IP was blocked for 3 years for repeated Oversight violations back in March. Since then they continue to use the talkpage to post a string of odd messages, almost all containing personal address information. Request is to restrict talk page access from IP during the duration of the block. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:50, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Widr (talk) 18:55, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Someone has been adding pornographic images to the article and this has continued after expiry of protection. Please also delete revisions [2] [3]. - Managerarc talk 07:22, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also deleted the offensive versions. Katietalk 17:13, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – After the two previous protections expired, Atomic Meltdown is back socking, yet again. Nymf (talk) 07:27, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 17:14, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Standard to avoid temporary sponsornames just like City of Manchester Stadium (called Etihad Stadium) and should not be moved without going through RM. Qed237 (talk) 13:46, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 17:20, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vensco (T | C) 17:13, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 17:16, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: Highly visible template – 12000+ transclusions (manual rough count with WhatLinksHere). I'm a bit on the fence about this one, but given the high transclusion count, template-protection might be warranted. — Andy W. (talk ·ctb) 17:15, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Katietalk 17:17, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. SvEcHpInXID (talk) 20:24, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Seems well under control; please relist if it picks up. Lectonar (talk) 12:43, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent block evasion by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Atomic Meltdown. Nymf (talk) 07:28, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 16:47, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Return of the IP vandals, article previously protected for the same reason. DonIago (talk) 15:37, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 16:42, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition of unsourced future promotions by various IPs. Ignoring talk requests and talk page discussion. SummerPhDv2.0 13:20, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:20, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – constant vandalism from ip addresses. Coolman207ee (talk) 14:57, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Widr (talk) 16:25, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Immediately after a one month period of semi-protection, we're back to the sockpuppetry. A longer period of protection is needed. ~ RobTalk 15:02, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:25, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This recently came off a one month period of semi-protection and it's immediately back to the puppetry that caused the protection in the first place. Two months of semi might be in order. ~ RobTalk 16:30, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:32, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 13:11, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Actually, a request within the past 8 days was approved, Cyberbot. It only lasted for two days though and clearly wasn't long enough. This has previously been protected for up to one month. Snuggums (talk / edits) 13:35, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 14:19, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 13:50, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:17, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sixth of March 14:18, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Both. Lectonar (talk) 14:34, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vensco (T | C) 03:23, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:58, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent edit warring by IP's with no attempts to discuss the issue on the talk instead. Sro23 (talk) 07:39, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:48, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Recurring attacks by socks of LTA Vgleer (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Please see history of my talkpage including recent history. . Dr. K. 11:45, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also changed visibility of edits. Lectonar (talk) 13:46, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vensco (T | C) 15:16, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 09:23, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vensco (T | C) 22:47, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:27, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism over past several weeks, mostly changes to number of states. BilCat (talk) 03:00, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done I semi-protected this indefinitely. Highly visible article. It was already indefinitely move protected. Checking the last 500 edits, most were reverted vandalism. A quick glance at the article's history indicates that situation has existed for several years. — Maile (talk) 13:14, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: This is another example of a page where the IP edits are rarely sensible. Previous semi-protection in May 2016 has expired and the nonsense edits have come straight back again.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 05:34, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:28, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – History of disruption related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. While Iran isn't an Arab state, this specific subject (the Iran Nuclear Deal) is deeply steeped in issues relating to Israel and Palestine, to the extent that I believe it meets the "reasonably construed" component of WP:ARBPIA3#500/30, which to my understanding is mandatory.

This page was also full-protected due to an edit war about a week ago, initially to last until mid-June. The full protection was lifted, I believe because it was interfering with fixes to the article. There has been an instance of vandalism since then as well. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 17:25, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – 42 revisions by 23 users in 2 months and only 2 were constructive. Previously protected briefly by Acroterion. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 05:53, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:44, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: From semi protection to recent changes. I do not think semi-protection is needed any longer, recent changes will do. 2605:6000:E8DA:8600:98D2:7BB9:FEE3:4F7B (talk) 22:54, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Paging Favonian to aisle 2. Katietalk 02:27, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Considering the history of this article, in particular the numerous protections that have been necessary, I cannot support this request. Strictly speaking, the current indefinite semi-protection was put in place by Darkwind (hereby paged) – I merely reinstated it following a short period with full protection. Favonian (talk) 15:30, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. It's clear from the prior page logs that PC protection was tried in the past and wasn't sufficient to prevent problems. –Darkwind (talk) 00:05, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 14:41, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:12, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vensco (T | C) 22:46, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:41, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High risk of IP vandalism per discussion here (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries,_2016#Proposals_for_Adding_Fraud_Section_to_Article). Michael Sheflin (talk) 01:46, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. MusikAnimal talk 02:32, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Apologize for misunderstanding; will resubmit if issue. (Also, if you look attached Talk page, it isn't exactly preemptive.) Michael Sheflin (talk) 04:54, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

72-hour semi-protection: Harassment. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 08:55, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 h, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., also blocked the last IP for 24h so that new appearances should be treated now as block evasion.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:10, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP vandalism has resumed shortly after previous semiprotection expired. See diff. Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz (talk) 03:59, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:04, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: User request. TJH2018talk 01:17, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected MusikAnimal talk 02:30, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Musik! TJH2018talk 02:34, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent edit warring and disruption. Not just by the most recent dynamic IP editor. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 06:31, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:06, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Went back to getting unsourced content/probable vandalism from multiple anon contributors less than a week after last protection expired. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 17:01, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 02:24, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vensco (T | C) 18:27, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 02:22, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ongoing IP page blanking and shenanigans. Ogress 20:56, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 02:28, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Need help with edit war and COI editor. Thank-you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:80:4003:7416:C9CF:FDAF:4732:2E90 (talk) 13:59, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 18:22, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The IP vandalism has flared up again. — TAnthonyTalk 14:03, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 02:18, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Ongoing defamatory trolling. Also needs oversight to remove some of the diffs. Dennis Bratland (talk) 16:57, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 22:16, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vensco (T | C) 03:42, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 21:40, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Random86 (talk) 11:05, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 21:50, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vensco (T | C) 17:52, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 21:50, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —MRD2014 (formerly Qpalzmmzlapq) T C 21:03, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 21:52, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

03 June 2016

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – See Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2016_May_27#Shitpost. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:40, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Salted indefinitely, only an admin can recreate it. — Maile (talk) 13:40, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from a longterm anonymous vandal with a morphing IP and a history of inserting and edit-warring to keep inserted blatant original research commentary about Disney's Black Pete allegedly "always was a chubby wolf." Has returned to the now-unprotected page to begin edit-warring again.--Mr Fink (talk) 14:43, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 14:46, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Blocked user continues to use talk page to vandalize, talk page access needs to be revoked. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:04, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. Widr (talk) 15:23, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. Lectonar (talk) 15:52, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. NasssaNser talk|cont 13:28, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Widr (talk) 14:38, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP with various addresses, all in Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia:-

175.145.61.205. 175.145.61.205 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

175.145.227.186 175.145.227.186 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

115.132.23.1 115.132.23.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

60.52.95.157 60.52.95.157 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Is making inaccurate edits and vandalism and is continuing, despite several warnings. David J Johnson (talk) 14:21, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 14:37, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism - few constructive edits from IPs. -NottNott|talk Notify with {{re}} 14:30, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 14:36, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Childish vandalism from a longtime IP sock vandal who thinks fictional characters are real. See this section in my sandbox for a summary of this. —DangerousJXD (talk) 08:17, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I looked at the edits and determined they could be good faith; I can understand the article is about something fictional without the word "fictional" having to be there. Sounds like a good copyedit to me. No protection necessary. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:15, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ritchie333, trust me mate, this is vandalism. The word "fictional" is standard for these sorts of articles if you didn't already know. Removing it over and over and over and over again is vandalism. Many users have tried talking to this user about this over a period of at least two years and the vandal has never said anything. They have acknowledged that they are aware that they have been told to stop making these edits because they have removed posts off the talk pages of the IPs they use. Note that around ten pages have been protected multiple times because of this. Around ten protecting administrators, dozens of reverting users, myself of course, and a few people who participated in a discussion I once started would disagree with your statement that these edits are productive copyediting. There is no way around it, these edits are vandalism. If you haven't already, take at look at the section in my sandbox which I linked you to above. It contains a list of every IP I have seen making this edit (the oldest activity being April 2014), a basic summary of this situation, and a diff to an admin displaying the opposite opinion to yours. —DangerousJXD (talk) 09:26, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry, but I do not believe this is vandalism, which I define as a deliberate and obvious attempt to make Wikipedia worse. It may be disruptive, against consensus, and annoying, but I don't believe that removing the word "fictional" makes the article obviously worse. Indeed, I would argue it makes it more concise and more readable, which is a good thing, so I'm with the IP on this one. More to the point, there is not enough continual and frequent changes on this article to warrant a protection. If things are as severe as you believe they are, I would recommend starting a thread on WP:ANI instead. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:30, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That's your opinion. Just know that everybody else who has directly commented on this would disagree with you. —DangerousJXD (talk) 09:37, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I am with Ritchie333 here; actually I would have said: Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.. In olden times I would have said: just watchlist and revert; page protection is not the way to go here; much to heavy-handed. Lectonar (talk) 09:43, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Lectonar, I expected the decline for there not being much activity but I requested anyway because I was told by one of the protecting admins that waiting for three instances of the vandalism rather than one is "overly bureaucratic" (diff). I can't get over how you both see it as productive copyediting though. You two are literally the only two users – out of dozens who have commented on this – who have not considered this behaviour to be vandalism. It is clear vandalism. Even if you didn't want to use that term, one simply can not argue that these edits are productive. Watching and reverting is generally how I handle this. I usually only request protection when the edit occurs say five times in one day. Again, I requested 'early' this time because I was pretty much told to do so (same diff as linked above). —DangerousJXD (talk) 09:52, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You are reading something into my words which I didn't say: I am with Ritchie333 as to declining the request, but as a "nea" (Actually he provided this rationale too: "...there is not enough continual and frequent changes on this article to warrant a protection" . The frequency is just not high enough. Fell free to bring this up at ANI, though. Lectonar (talk) 09:56, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'd rather cut off all my toes with a pair of scissors than spend one minute at ANI. I don't have ten hours spare and it wouldn't achieve anything anyway. It's good to hear that you have some sense in regard to this matter. I'll handle this junk how I have always handled it, revert on the spot, occasionally request page protection. I assume this person isn't stopping anytime soon so I'll likely be playing this game with them until I am no longer active here. —DangerousJXD (talk) 10:13, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unsourced editing. Kő Cloch (talk) 12:55, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 14:02, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: This page wants to be edited by IPs and moving by autoconfirmed users. 112.134.81.133 (talk) 09:50, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The page actually does not have a say in this; disruption was too great, and I do not think it will be better when we lift the protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:53, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Try again unprotect 112.134.81.133 (talk) 09:59, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anushka Sen

Creation protected Salted the second one; the first one already is creation-protected. Lectonar (talk) 07:59, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Childish vandalism from a longtime IP sock vandal who thinks fictional characters are real. See this section in my sandbox for a summary of this. —DangerousJXD (talk) 08:17, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined per below Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:15, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Carl Hewitt

Please allow editing talk page and article.

Carl (talk) 19:50, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(non-administrator comment) The page can be edited by the user above; he appears to be autoconfirmed already. — Andy W. (talk ·ctb) 20:22, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
(non-administrator comment) My misunderstanding. The editor requested this to allow new and unregistered editors to edit. — Andy W. (talk ·ctb) 20:36, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I am not requesting that I be able to edit this talk page or the article. Instead, I am requesting that others be able to edit the talk page and the article. Carl (talk) 20:38, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You should always start with the protecting admin, so let's ask Sarah what she thinks. Katietalk 21:03, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the ping. I added indefinite semi-protection to the article because of all the trouble, which is likely to start up again if it's lifted. I also semi-protected the talk page in 2011, lifted it in 2013, and it was later restored, mostly recently by Ruud Koot. SarahSV (talk) 23:38, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'd also advice against lifting the semi-protection, given the long history of problematic edits from anonymous users and single-purpose accounts. —Ruud 23:40, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected It seems to me that what the requester really wants is more eyes on their edit suggestions. Perhaps they might want to consider using WP:RSN and WP:COIN for broader input toward their specific edit proposals. There doesn't seem to be a benefit from opening up the article to anonymous users and, based on the two comments above, there appears to be a definite downside.--regentspark (comment) 00:00, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same vandal as before, the "Box-office bomb" vandal from Cambridge, Ontario, Canada.[4] . Binksternet (talk) 23:07, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 03:44, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Lots of edit warring. Crboyer (talk) 23:49, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 03:47, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vensco (T | C) 00:05, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 03:48, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Noncommittalp (talk) 01:02, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 03:50, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – edit warring by IPs, against consensus supported by both "sides". Gaijin42 (talk) 01:12, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 03:51, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. —MRD2014 (formerly Qpalzmmzlapq) T C 02:51, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Nakon 03:53, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vensco (T | C) 03:02, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 03:54, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – While this is a redirect to {{Talk quotation}} (with ~12000 transclusions), most folks use this redirect (counted ~11000 transclusions), so template-protection is warranted. — Andy W. (talk ·ctb) 05:41, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected Coffee // have a cup // beans // 07:04, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Speedied 3 times in 2 days. OnionRing (talk) 06:17, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Jimfbleak. — Andy W. (talk ·ctb) 06:57, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – POV-pushing and edit warring by IP-hoppers. Blocked user uses dynamic IPs for edit warring. Wario-Man (talk) 03:52, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 03:56, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – POV-pushing and edit warring by IP-hoppers. Blocked user uses dynamic IPs for edit warring. Wario-Man (talk) 03:52, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 03:57, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – NBA Finals-related vandalism in the last few hours from many different IPs. MisterRandomized (talk) 04:36, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Bagumba. Nakon 05:21, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vensco (T | C) 23:16, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 03:45, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vensco (T | C) 23:46, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 03:46, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – (Not necessarily indefinite, but long-term protection) Haven't seen a constructive IP edit to this article for more than a year... Vensco (T | C) 23:56, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 03:47, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vensco (T | C) 00:12, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 03:49, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued disruption by the same IP range from the previous page protection period. Vensco (T | C) 00:17, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 03:50, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection: Very high level of IP vandalism. IPs keep adding fake boxscore numbers and I'm tired of reverting back thoses edits. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 01:25, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 03:51, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vensco (T | C) 02:37, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 03:53, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rubin Carter

Semi-protection: Long term abuse by a proxy hopper trying to alter text that a talk page discussion reached a consensus on

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 03:43, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vensco (T | C) 03:46, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 03:55, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Recently had a month of semi-protection, and immediately back to the sockpuppetry that initiated it. False changes to charts/certifications. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Никита-Родин-2002 and its archive for details. ~ RobTalk 00:16, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Tired of screwing around here. If it persists after this expires, let me know and I'll indef it. This is ridiculous. Katietalk 01:13, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – between the peninsula edit warring and Amitashi's edits... . EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 00:17, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 01:17, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Drive-by IPs geolocating in the same general range keep making bizarre edits to alter and remove material from this article. Needs semi-protection for at least 30 days. Montanabw(talk) 01:50, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 02:24, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Even more block evasion by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Atomic Meltdown. Nymf (talk) 18:47, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 19:26, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Lectonar: 2 hours ago seems recent enough. Nymf (talk) 20:13, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Nymf: The page was never protected, and we have exactly 1 instance of vandalism in the last 10 days. If you have not done so already, please read the protection policy. Lectonar (talk) 20:24, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vensco (T | C) 21:42, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vensco (T | C) 21:43, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IPs edit warring at page, see [5][6][7][8][9]. Both slow and recent edit warring. MjolnirPants Tell me all about it. 20:09, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GedUK  18:20, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Endless IP/New user vandalism of BLP. Lengthy log. Enough is enough, vandalism outweighs any contribution from such users '''tAD''' (talk) 21:06, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 21:24, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:27, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 21:29, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

04 June 2016

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – consistent IP vandalism. RF23 (talk) 12:29, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Most recent edits appear to be good-faith contributions MusikAnimal talk 17:43, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP disruption. Unregistered user using multiple IPs (up to 3 in a 24 hour period). Although the matter is hopefully been settled by registered users on the article's Talk page, article should be protected to prevent the IP user from popping up again. SonOfThornhill (talk) 14:26, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:21, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Taffe316 (talk) 20:32, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 20:45, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vensco (T / C) 21:39, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 21:42, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -- The Voidwalker Discuss 19:08, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:13, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -- The Voidwalker Discuss 19:21, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:22, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: 112.134.80.4 (talk) 09:50, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined No reason given. tutterMouse (talk) 16:02, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent edit-warring about the infobox by IPs. The page should be under WP:ARBPIA3 restrictions anyway. Kingsindian   15:11, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a good candidate for extended confirmed protection. KGirlTrucker87 talk what I'm been doing 15:28, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done: extended confirmed protected. BethNaught (talk) 19:09, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some short-term vandalism from multiple IP addresses. -- LuK3 (Talk) 15:44, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

IPs started to insert incorrect information in there. KGirlTrucker87 talk what I'm been doing 16:05, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 18:31, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. clpo13(talk) 17:20, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:44, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Ymblanter: looks like we need a range block here. And protection until it can be decided if that can be done. Too much IP hopping. Doug Weller talk 18:28, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., indeed the new sock convinced me.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:41, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: BLP vandalism resumed by multiple new accounts as soon as last protection ended. Meters (talk) 19:06, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:12, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection:' This page is not persistently vandalized, but it is not monitored so when it is vandalized, it's usually to change or challenge something a person with a stake in the page has made. I've tried to keep this page neutral for a while, and it's been difficult. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.92.70.106 (talk) 06:54, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., let us try pending changes first--Ymblanter (talk) 17:46, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP disruptive activity. From yesterday, a large amount of IP users of new creation have started to edit the page to remove a sourced opinion poll, without even giving reasons for such a removal. One of them was recently blocked for WP:HARASS. They are seemingly Spanish users coming from the electomania.es page, which, as by the reading of some comments in this page, seem to have started some sort of "attack" against this article to remove this specific opinion poll "for the sake of it", just because they don't like the data it shows. This poll is allegedly an internal party poll from PSOE, but which, unlike other such polls, has been widely published in the main Spanish media (some examples: El Mundo, El País, RTVE, ABC or La Voz de Galicia). It also shows the sample size, only lacking the fieldwork date. As a result, it has enough relevance to be included in Wikipedia, yet it is highly annoying to have a host of IP users to remove it without any justification or any attempt at discussion and even receiving insults from some of them. Impru20 (talk) 09:02, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. '''tAD''' (talk) 09:18, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:52, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 10:30, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:54, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 11:03, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:55, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther :  Talk  11:05, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 11:08, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 12:16, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator C.Fred. MusikAnimal talk 17:42, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unprotected a couple days ago and the IP is at it again. I say we need an extension. –Compassionate727 (T·C) 13:09, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 17:44, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Continuous genre warring by multiple IP's and established editors. Vensco (T / C) 16:34, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 17:46, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Unsourced changes made by a nationalist IP-hopper. Calidum ¤ 16:59, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 17:48, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent spike in vandalism, likely because of the subject's death. Calidum ¤ 17:01, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 17:50, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Vensco (T / C) 17:26, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 17:41, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 22:38, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 03:59, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism/removal. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 23:36, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Nakon 04:00, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: or Temporary semi-protection. Haven't seen a constructive IP edit from this article since Jan. 31, 2016. After that edit, it's pure IP vandalism as far as thee' I can see!. Vensco (T | C) 00:23, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 04:01, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: No constructive IP edits. Vensco (T | C) 00:48, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 04:02, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vensco (T | C) 02:33, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 04:06, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. 2607:FB90:FDF:F43E:0:C:DB7E:7F01 (talk) 17:23, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 03:41, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 17:26, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 03:43, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 17:26, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 03:43, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Drive-by IP vandalism a problem again. Maybe protect for 30 days or so. Montanabw(talk) 18:09, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Nakon 03:44, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Judge Curiel is in the news at the moment. Although he belongs to a similarly named group, it is this page that is being repeatedly vandalized in an attempt to introduce bias into the article. Archivist1642 18:31, 3 June 2016 (UTC)archivist1642

Hi, please note that the edits are from neutral and reliable academic sources, are well supported and quite notable in nature and have nothing at all to do with archivist1642's political concerns. Good faith edits should be addressed in good faith, on the talk page. thank you.64.53.252.50 (talk) 18:40, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The material I deleted was commentary from Cesar Chavez about the phrase "La Raza" and dated from before the time at which this organization used "La Raza" as any part of its name. It was not relevant to this organization and did not belong in this article. There is an article about La Raza that would be appropriate for that content.
Subsequent to that edit, another anonymous user (01:20, 4 June 2016‎ 71.179.244.138 ) went in and changed the content of the article so that my reference no longer supports the content. Please protect this page. It's had to be done in the past, unfortunately. Thanks. Archivist1642 01:49, 4 June 2016 (UTC)archivist1642 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Archivist1642 (talkcontribs)
I'm not the editor who Archivist1642 is now complaining about - but I will state that the edit he complains about is rather innocuous and can be seen as good faith in that it is an accurate direct translation. It is NOT an edit I support. I'll also note the that Archivist1642's reference in support of his edit is from an article about the name of a building and has nothing whatsoever to do with the organization. Archivist1642 has yet to grace the article talk page and discuss any of his edits or reverts with anyone.64.53.252.50 (talk) 02:27, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
In support of Archivist1642 I have reverted the edit of IP:138 due to lack of a reliable sourced ref and due to the contradiction the edit has with the ref that IP:138 left attached to it. Hardly a crisis.64.53.252.50 (talk) 02:30, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 03:47, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Nairspecht Converse 19:14, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 03:47, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anon IP reinserting unconfirmed BLP issue and refusing to discuss it on the Talk pagr. Karst (talk) 19:49, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Nakon 03:51, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:47, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 03:53, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple airport pages

Pending changes protection: Multiple airport pages such as Southwest Florida International Airport and Midway International Airport has seen tremendous amounts of vandalism from various IPs. There are a couple more pages as well. Bradley International Airport is another example. Please put pending changes protection to these pages so reviewers can review these edits so the vandalism is not immediately accepted. Thanks, *AirportUpdater* (talk) 07:39, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • @*AirportUpdater*: When you come here claiming vandalism to these types of pages, with lots of statistics and numerical changes, we can't really tell what is and isn't vandalism without diffs and sources. I'll leave this open if you want to provide those; a couple per page is fine. If you don't do this, we can't protect the page and another admin will close this as declined. Katietalk 01:31, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure what diffs and sources I am to provide. Can't you just see the history of these three articles for example? IP users 2601:180:8000:f320:e5de:56c8:9738:2eb0 and 2601:180:8000:f320:25b1:3f98:f7f1:75d0 have deleted large amounts of current routes from the destination tables without any explanation why. I am requesting pending changes protection for these pages due to the vandalism that these users ensued on the above three pages. *AirportUpdater* (talk) 02:54, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Nakon 03:33, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi, preferably long term. Was the subject of an ANI some time ago that caused a bit of a stir. Since then has been a magnet for outright vandalism, as well as probably good faith, but completely unsourced IP edits.

There's no rationale I see for leaving the page open to anon edits (although there may be a good argument for AfD if someone wants to champion that). It's an article based around a single source updated annually, and in theory should require exactly zero edits for the remainder of the year, until the updated Forbes list is put out. TimothyJosephWood 12:45, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 03:34, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous target of IP edits of making the critical reception from mixed to positive. —IB [ Poke ] 15:04, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Please submit a request at WP:EFR so article edits can be restricted. This should be a simple edit filter for the article. Thanks, Nakon 03:36, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – This went on for at least one year probably. George Ho (talk) 20:59, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 01:09, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As this is generally a politically right-wing news network, there are those who disagree with the views of this news network vandalizing it. Adotchar (talk) 23:33, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 01:08, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple airport pages

Pending changes protection: Multiple airport pages such as Southwest Florida International Airport and Midway International Airport has seen tremendous amounts of vandalism from various IPs. There are a couple more pages as well. Bradley International Airport is another example. Please put pending changes protection to these pages so reviewers can review these edits so the vandalism is not immediately accepted. Thanks, *AirportUpdater* (talk) 07:39, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • @*AirportUpdater*: When you come here claiming vandalism to these types of pages, with lots of statistics and numerical changes, we can't really tell what is and isn't vandalism without diffs and sources. I'll leave this open if you want to provide those; a couple per page is fine. If you don't do this, we can't protect the page and another admin will close this as declined. Katietalk 01:31, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure what diffs and sources I am to provide. Can't you just see the history of these three articles for example? IP users 2601:180:8000:f320:e5de:56c8:9738:2eb0 and 2601:180:8000:f320:25b1:3f98:f7f1:75d0 have deleted large amounts of current routes from the destination tables without any explanation why. I am requesting pending changes protection for these pages due to the vandalism that these users ensued on the above three pages. *AirportUpdater* (talk) 02:54, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Nakon 03:33, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi, preferably long term. Was the subject of an ANI some time ago that caused a bit of a stir. Since then has been a magnet for outright vandalism, as well as probably good faith, but completely unsourced IP edits.

There's no rationale I see for leaving the page open to anon edits (although there may be a good argument for AfD if someone wants to champion that). It's an article based around a single source updated annually, and in theory should require exactly zero edits for the remainder of the year, until the updated Forbes list is put out. TimothyJosephWood 12:45, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 03:34, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous target of IP edits of making the critical reception from mixed to positive. —IB [ Poke ] 15:04, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Please submit a request at WP:EFR so article edits can be restricted. This should be a simple edit filter for the article. Thanks, Nakon 03:36, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – This went on for at least one year probably. George Ho (talk) 20:59, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 01:09, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As this is generally a politically right-wing news network, there are those who disagree with the views of this news network vandalizing it. Adotchar (talk) 23:33, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 01:08, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Dynamic IPv6 back at it after last protect expired. Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:48, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined All the editor is trying to do is stick on Not to be confused with Red Robin without knowing the correct template. I've added the template for them. This is not vandalism. No need to protect. — Maile (talk) 22:17, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) I think Geraldo Perez is mainly concerned about the sockpuppetry issue more than the vandalism. Also, the page was previously protected by Nakon and they are back after the given protection period with the same type of behavior. Vensco (T | C) 22:22, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see it that way, but Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations is the place to address those concerns. And just to be clear, the IP addresses change from day to day, going back to before the first protection when Nakon protected it for vandalism, with the exception of one date where there are 16 hours between posts. That could simply be how the service provider has it set up to change every time the user logs on.— Maile (talk) 22:30, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This is a dynamic IPv6, no question same user in /64 range. Impossible to communicate with as comes up on different IP each time logs in. Waste of time for SPI as nothing really to investigate. Needs either a /64 range block or protect to article he hits. More of a edit warring issue about proper use of hatnotes. Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:51, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Then maybe this should have first been discussed on the article talk page.— Maile (talk) 22:57, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Noted. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:02, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This edit warring needs to stop. Nakon 03:55, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 03:57, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Has been protected 3 times and they keep vandalizing it, and most of this vandalism is by unregistered users. TheDasherLegendXD 23:54, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 04:01, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – This article is a mess, nothing has references or edit summaries explaining the changes. I looked for a good version to revert to but there are too many date and name changes to find a correct one. This article needs some serious copy editing. discussions and edit requests shoud be helpful. Mlpearc (open channel) 02:25, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 04:06, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent, long-term vandalism and disruptive editing. The majority of recent edits have been vandalism and reverts. Pending changes has not prevented further vandalism; further action is needed to prevent vandalism and stop wasting editors' time reverting vandals. Regards, James (talk/contribs) 02:46, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 04:07, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: incessant vandalism (see [10]). Quis separabit? 03:55, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 04:08, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Enough sockpuppet and IP crap has been going on the article from the time the last protection expired. —IB [ Poke ] 15:17, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 03:40, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Flow234 (talk) 17:08, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 03:40, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sam Liccardo is in the news at the moment and since this is a BLP it might be a good idea to give it a short PP. See recent vandalism on the page. Thanks. . SW3 5DL (talk) 18:25, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Yamaguchi先生. Nakon 03:45, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Throw-away accounts repeatedly recreating an article deleted at AfD (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Euro- Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor). The name was later turned into a redirect, and it's this redirect that is repeatedly "converted" to an article, bypassing AfC. Recreations that just like the original article have no reliable third-party sources independent of the subject at all, since there simply aren't any... Thomas.W talk 20:53, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 03:52, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vensco (T | C) 23:26, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Looks like it was one IP three hours ago. —C.Fred (talk) 23:32, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: various users/anonymous are inserting advert/spam external links They appear to be one-time, and serial abusers (multiple articles)

Spam links are being inserted in

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 03:32, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: I think that the first statement: "Trump has never done drugs, or smoked cigarettes, and has always heeded a warning from his older brother (an alcoholic) to not drink alcohol.[83]" is misleading as the source is quoting Donald Trump directly. This, in my opinion, is a biased citation, to promote the involved person, as it seems like a confirmed fact. My suggestion would be to change it to "Trump claims he has..." as saying "Trump has never done" and "Trump claims he has never done" have completely different meanings, and the source does not confirm the former. In general, as a decent conduct for a wikipedia article, I actually find that this piece of information to be of a psychological nature appeal instead of factual and as so, I regard it irrelevant as an "encyclopedic" entry. Nonetheless, I just ask for the change of the statement, although I also leave here my own personal view. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LordKaramazov (talkcontribs) 10:23, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the statement, entirely. "15 fact" lists are rarely reliable unless they provide their sources, and we can check them. If a reliable source quotes Trump as saying that, that we be fine. However, I'm not doing this as an admin, so I don't want to close the request. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 18:00, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done, for the bot. Nakon 03:29, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Consensus not yet reached, discussion ongoing on talk page. Allegations of offsite canvassing (on Facebook) for people to edit article. . Keri (talk) 16:57, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Endorse I recognize that my conduct may not have been perfect recently but this is getting silly with repetitive WP:IDONTLIKEIT and WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT by a group of editors. I'm NOT going to participate in edit warring on this but I believe the article needs re-protecting until consensus is reached instead of on a timer this time. Some of the editors in question appear to be exerting an intent not to come to consensus and just to continue edit warring instead. Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz (talk) 17:00, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • NOTE for reviewing administrator: The current version repeatedly being improperly and inappropriately restored includes allegations as fact supported by an unreliable source. That version has been restored repeatedly by an anon IP geolocating to the same area and a red-link user. If FPP is enacted, please restore the unbiased, NPOV, and appropriately sourced version of the article first, per Wikipedia policies and guidelines for biographies. Thank you,-- WV 17:40, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Per @Keri: - the claims by Winkelvi are inaccurate, and "Clearly a case of Wikipedia:I just don't like it and WP:ICANTHEARYOU". Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz (talk) 17:49, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 01:28, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Whenever a tennis player makes a big result, their article gets flooded with ignorant edits from inexperienced editors (typically anonymous IPs with no edits) who keep reporting their speculative, future ranking as their official current ranking, writing about the future in the past tense ("was on 6 June" when it's 2 June etc.), unaware of the fact that they are violating WikiProject Tennis/Article guidelines, WP:CRYSTAL and of course WP:V. This is happening on Dominic Thiem (among other articles) now: [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19]. It's getting more and more urgent. Please semi-protect the article until Monday June 6 when the new rankings are actually officially released.—J. M. (talk) 17:30, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 01:23, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: or Temporary semi-protection. No constructive IP edits as far as thee' I can see!. Vensco (T | C) 00:28, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely.--regentspark (comment) 00:49, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:48, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely.

Full Protection: Vandalism, plus it defines the whole site, I thought it would already be fully protected... Finnh54 (talk) 16:59, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Please read WP:PROT on protection policy. Protection of pages is generally done as a last resort when user blocks do not deter a consistent stream of vandalism. "Pre-emptive full protection of articles is contrary to the open nature of Wikipedia." non-admin response, thought this was an easy case — Andy W. (talk ·ctb) 18:22, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Yesterday I asked for temporary semi-protection on this article, and it was given pending changes protection for 3 months (see request and response). Since then, an IP hopping vandal continues the same stream of vandalism on this BLP. PLEASE upgrade this protection so we can stop the constant reverts. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 20:57, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There are enough disruptive edits and BLP violations on this article to justify upping the protection to semi. I did adjust the time to 1 month though. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:23, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP's been blocked for vandalizing ... so has come back under a new IP to continue vandalizing , Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 21:08, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 21:11, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Brilliant thanks Widr, –Davey2010Talk 21:15, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Same as also indefinite salted creation of Jacob Sartorius. Vensco (T | C) 22:11, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I also salted the draft article. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:15, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

05 June 2016

Saltwater crocodile (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary full protection This page is currently the subject of an Edit Warring Report against user:WelcometoJurassicPark all editors involved with the discussions to reach consensus have refrained from further editing while this process plays out. However the reported editor has continued to edit unrestrained. As such I would appreciate it if the page could be protected until a decision on the Edit Warring Report is made, to prevent further issues. It possibly would also help for once the protection was lifted if this version was restored first which was the last version prior to the report. I know I could do this part myself but I too am refraining from editing the page. Thank you Faendalimas talk 18:55, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Somewhat stale now; no edits for more than 1 day. Please relist if it becomes a problem Lectonar (talk) 17:46, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Re-occuring vandalism from dynamic IP 217.73 and likely socks. Qed237 (talk) 22:42, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:44, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Re-occuring vandalism from dynamic IP 217.73 and likely socks. Qed237 (talk) 22:43, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:55, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Re-occuring vandalism from dynamic IP 217.73 and likely socks. Qed237 (talk) 22:43, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 17:44, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Re-occuring vandalism from dynamic IP 217.73 and likely socks. Qed237 (talk) 22:43, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 17:45, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Re-occuring vandalism from dynamic IP 217.73 and likely socks. Qed237 (talk) 22:44, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 15:48, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: or Temporary semi-protection. No constructive IP edits at all... Vensco (T / C) 04:49, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Surprisingly not many edits at all. Lectonar (talk) 17:48, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: User:Dino nam resumes the editing war as soon as the blocking period is over. Tnguyen4321 (talk) 15:35, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 17:49, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Vensco (T / C) 17:45, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:51, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Re-occuring vandalism from dynamic IP 217.73 and likely socks. Qed237 (talk) 22:39, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 15:35, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Re-occuring vandalism from dynamic IP 217.73 and likely socks. Qed237 (talk) 22:40, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 15:26, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Re-occuring vandalism from dynamic IP 217.73 and likely socks. Qed237 (talk) 22:40, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 15:35, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Re-occuring vandalism from dynamic IP 217.73 and likely socks. Qed237 (talk) 22:40, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 15:26, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Re-occuring vandalism from dynamic IP 217.73 and likely socks. Qed237 (talk) 22:44, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 15:39, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Re-occuring vandalism from dynamic IP 217.73 and likely socks. Qed237 (talk) 22:45, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 15:38, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Re-occuring vandalism from dynamic IP 217.73 and likely socks. Qed237 (talk) 22:45, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 15:38, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Re-occuring vandalism from dynamic IP 217.73 and likely socks. Qed237 (talk) 22:46, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 15:38, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Re-occuring vandalism from dynamic IP 217.73. Qed237 (talk) 22:38, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 15:14, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Re-occuring vandalism from dynamic IP 217.73 and likely socks. Qed237 (talk) 22:39, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 15:15, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Re-occuring vandalism from dynamic IP 217.73 and likely socks. Qed237 (talk) 22:39, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 15:15, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Re-occuring vandalism from dynamic IP 217.73 and likely socks. Qed237 (talk) 22:39, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 15:16, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Re-occuring vandalism from dynamic IP 217.73 and likely socks. Qed237 (talk) 22:39, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 15:20, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Re-occuring vandalism from dynamic IP 217.73 and likely socks. Qed237 (talk) 22:40, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 15:25, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Re-occuring vandalism from dynamic IP 217.73 and likely socks. Qed237 (talk) 22:40, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 15:25, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection: Because this template has been substituted so many times, it might help to keep its title so that only administrators can change it, providing they have a good reason. HeatIsCool (talk) 15:09, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected Lectonar (talk) 19:15, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: or Temporary semi-protection. Persistent addition of unsourced or improperly sourced content. Vensco (T / C) 18:35, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also pending-changes level 1 protected for 1 month. Lectonar (talk) 19:14, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Currently taking part in Soccer Aid and receiving a large amount of IP vandalism. Kosack (talk) 19:01, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 19:12, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring IPv6s. Majora (talk) 19:23, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 19:24, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated disruption here echos a longer term problem by the same editor at ATV Offroad Fury where over a dozen IPs have been used to add the same disputed material 24 times despite several blocks, a range block and page protection. A separate RPP filed for that page and a block request for the latest IP (the one involved here) have also been filed. SummerPhDv2.0 03:31, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 17:47, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: See WP:ANI#User Amitashi, Chronic edit warring on Ukraine related topics. Currently indeffed, obvious return as IP carrying on in the same vein. WCMemail 15:24, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:45, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editor back again with blanking the article. clpo13(talk) 18:20, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 18:22, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full Protection: Persistent undoing of edit for the new official name of the centre by one user, even though a source has been cited to prove as evidence. Tony Fan123 (talk) 21:09, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, content dispute--Ymblanter (talk) 11:16, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Re-occuring vandalism from dynamic IP 217.73 and likely socks. Qed237 (talk) 22:46, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection., last occurrence of vandalism was on 25 May--Ymblanter (talk) 11:44, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – One identical edit made 24 times by over a dozen IPs in spite of several blocks, a range block and prior protection. Editor, of course, ignores talk requests. SummerPhDv2.0 03:24, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 15:26, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Long term abuse by a proxy hopper maintaining that a homicide was lawful self defense when all other editors have noted that it resulted in a never overturned criminal conviction for voluntary manslaughter.

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 15:44, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection. The page has rapidly changed from a place to discuss this FAC to one with free medical advice and conspiracy theories. The user Light show is the issue there. We hope (talk) 20:29, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, I do not see any reasons to protect the article. If you think the topic should be discussed elsewhere, may be you can propose the change at the talk page of the article. If you think the actions of the editor are not appropriate, WP:ANI may be a good place.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:45, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Re-occuring vandalism from dynamic IP 217.73 and likely socks. Qed237 (talk) 22:47, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edit was on May 22nd (!) Lectonar (talk) 10:44, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Re-occuring vandalism from dynamic IP 217.73 and likely socks. Qed237 (talk) 22:47, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edit was on May 22nd (!) Lectonar (talk) 10:44, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Re-occuring vandalism from dynamic IP 217.73 and likely socks. Qed237 (talk) 22:47, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edit was on May 22nd (!) Lectonar (talk) 10:43, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Re-occuring vandalism from dynamic IP 217.73 and likely socks. Qed237 (talk) 22:47, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edit was on May 22nd (!) Lectonar (talk) 10:43, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection. The page has rapidly changed from a place to discuss this FAC to one with free medical advice and conspiracy theories. The user Light show is the issue there. We hope (talk) 20:29, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, I do not see any reasons to protect the article. If you think the topic should be discussed elsewhere, may be you can propose the change at the talk page of the article. If you think the actions of the editor are not appropriate, WP:ANI may be a good place.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:45, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Re-occuring vandalism from dynamic IP 217.73 and likely socks. Qed237 (talk) 22:47, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edit was on May 22nd (!) Lectonar (talk) 10:44, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Re-occuring vandalism from dynamic IP 217.73 and likely socks. Qed237 (talk) 22:47, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edit was on May 22nd (!) Lectonar (talk) 10:44, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Re-occuring vandalism from dynamic IP 217.73 and likely socks. Qed237 (talk) 22:47, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edit was on May 22nd (!) Lectonar (talk) 10:43, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Re-occuring vandalism from dynamic IP 217.73 and likely socks. Qed237 (talk) 22:47, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edit was on May 22nd (!) Lectonar (talk) 10:43, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 14:58, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, most of the IP edits are fine, and vandalism is not really as frequent.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:19, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Dan56 (talk) 07:15, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, this is just one IP, you warned them, and they did not edit since. If they resume edit-warring, they should be blocked via WP:3RRN.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:15, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. According to this discussion, I asked other users to don't removing the gallery of the article. One of the administrators of commons, emphasized on my idea. but an IP doesn't attention (and doesn'tanswer me). So, I ask protection, Thank you. Sarbaze naja (talk) 08:27, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, please engage at the talk page discussion, valid points have been raised there.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:31, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Excuse me @Ymblanter:. Which valid point do you mean? I can't see any cooperation!Sarbaze naja (talk) 08:36, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Talk:Volleyball at the 2016 Summer Olympics – Men's qualification--Ymblanter (talk) 08:38, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi again @Ymblanter:. I did as you want.(and thank you) But what about the IP?! It doesn't answer me (I wrote: I am waiting your answer) and is the main reason of my ask!Sarbaze naja (talk) 09:12, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This is a content dispute; we do not protect pages to solve content disputes. If there is consensus at the talk page but IP continues to revert against consensus, they should be reported to WP:3RRN, however, I estimate this scenario as unlikely.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:15, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you @Ymblanter:. I'll do it.Sarbaze naja (talk) 09:21, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent unconstructive editing. SMS Talk 00:57, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:46, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IPs as usual with UFC events. Please protect it soon. Thanks. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 02:34, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:00, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Death hoax. Death is totally unconfirmed. {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 11:44, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 11:54, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: This page should be unsalted so that Ninja Steel can be moved to it. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 23:25, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Favonian:--Ymblanter (talk) 08:25, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected in spite of certain misgivings. Favonian (talk) 11:47, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: User:Dino nam resumes the editing war as soon as the blocking period is over. Tnguyen4321 (talk) 19:00, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 07:32, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Transfer rumours for a BLP. Just unsourced speculation. Qed237 (talk) 22:26, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:18, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: For months the same IP-hopping vandal, apparently with a personal vendetta against the subject, has been vandalizing the subject's name, never with explanation, never with cite. Over the last few days it has intensified. Protection for this page has been asked for before and declined. And this vandal has continued and continued and simply will not stop, so I'm not sure why the decline. --Tenebrae (talk) 02:05, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:21, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism by complete change of track list information

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Willondon (talk) 20:55, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

Semi-protected Widr (talk) 10:26, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and personal attacks. Typical childish IP behavior when presented with academic sources. --Kansas Bear (talk) 21:00, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:54, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SMS Talk 10:38, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:43, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP is back making personal attacks on my talk page. He has been blocked for a month[20], so a long block is also needed. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:49, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:53, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Renewed sockpuppetry by Filipz123. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 20:23, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:14, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Renewed sockpuppetry by Filipz123. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 20:23, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:15, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: many people in Iran misunderstood what is happening with Armenian visa policy. But the news clearly state the plan to sign a visa waiver was adopted, not the visa waiver itself. Diffs of 3 different users trying to add this info [21] [22] [23] despite the news clearly saying "The government formally approved a draft on visa-free travel between the two neighboring states. It did not specify when the deal will be signed." Now there is no bad faith in these edits, but they are disruptive anyway, so I propose a short term protection until the situation settles, maybe a week or so.Twofortnights (talk) 10:05, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:13, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Renewed sockpuppetry by Filipz123. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 20:22, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:39, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Renewed sockpuppetry by Filipz123. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 20:22, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:19, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Renewed sockpuppetry by Filipz123. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 20:23, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:24, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of vandalism, needs quick protection. Qed237 (talk) 16:28, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:21, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editors warring over unsourced information. clpo13(talk) 19:47, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:24, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Someone has recently found it humorous to edit my page from an IPv6 address. I'd request that it be semi-protected for 1 week, so that if they show up again, they would find that they can't edit my page, and move along, hopefully to not try again. KnowledgeBattle (Talk) | GodlessInfidel ︻╦╤── 05:18, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:34, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Article is subject to a current edit war, which has been reported to the noticeboard. IPs have persistently reverted changes despite discussion on the talk page and despite the efforts of myself, Twofortnights, and Norvikk. GabeIglesia (talk) 05:30, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:17, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: The 4th film has been announced, so this should be a redirect to High_School_Musical_(franchise)#High_School_Musical_4 . JDDJS (talk) 20:06, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done--Ymblanter (talk) 08:27, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Close to 700 transclusions. George Ho (talk) 19:02, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done WP:HRT — Maile (talk) 22:00, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Renewed sockpuppetry by Filipz123. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 20:40, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 22:09, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Escoperloit. He started to vandalize this article since 1 June 2016 again. This is a long-term sockpuppetry case. So I think an indefinite or long semi-protection is necessary, because the sockmaster (Escoperloit) will always return to this article. Wario-Man (talk) 03:24, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Zzuuzz for 6 months. tutterMouse (talk) 06:52, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Page has become a complete incubus for a song that does not meet notability for music songs per Wikipedia standards. No definite release date has been confirmed, and there is no charting history. This has merely become a page for fan POV. livelikemusic talk! 14:00, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, whereas likely correct, the article needs to go via PROD or AfD, and if it gets deleted, the redirect can be protected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:18, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some short-term vandalism since May by both multiple registered users and IP addresses. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:08, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 21:23, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: I'm don't see enough vandalism to warrant pending changes. Protecting admin has been inactive for over 1 week. Music1201 talk 22:31, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Please contact the protecting admin on their talk page first, and report back here if you do not receive a response in a reasonable amount of time. I would not consider 1 week of no edits as inactive. Nakon 03:30, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 15:56, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MusikAnimal talk 18:31, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent, continuous and long-term socking, IP vandalism, changing/removing of sourced content, and what-not, for a very long time. It's currently a "pending changes" article, but it's not effective enough as socks and WP:SPA accounts constantly return. - LouisAragon (talk) 16:21, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined It's been a mere two days, let's give PC a try. The edits are hidden from the general reading audience unless explicitly approved, so it is effective in that sense MusikAnimal talk 18:33, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP hopper. Vensco (T / C) 17:12, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:26, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. clpo13(talk) 18:19, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've edited this article in the past and don't think I should handle this, but I see one editor being reverted by 4 editors, which I don't think is a situation that warrants protection. Doug Weller talk 18:27, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined User has been warned. If they continue to edit war please report to WP:ANEW MusikAnimal talk 18:29, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Vensco (T / C) 19:47, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 21:49, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. OnionRing (talk) 21:03, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Widr (talk) 22:11, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

06 June 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 11:44, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 21:20, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People adding a non-confirmed transer. Kante4 (talk) 15:14, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 21:22, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Stifle edit war, addition of unsourced additions regarding programming after "sign-off". ViperSnake151  Talk  15:56, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 21:24, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As the Olympics are getting closer there seems to be more vandalism on this page. (The last edit was to revert vandalism as well). I am requesting indefinite because I don't think the situation will improve. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:22, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 21:25, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – A group of IPs or one IP hopping vandal are constantly changing the article into silly redirects. . Atlantic306 (talk) 17:48, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I note that multiple forms of IP vandalism, including page blanking, has been going on since January. — Maile (talk) 19:40, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP removal of cited content continued after temporary block by admin Coffee expired. OwainDavies (about)(talk) edited at 10:07, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The IP may be making a good faith attempt to adhere to their interpretation of WP:BLP and there is no discussion on the talk page. Also there is not enough activity to justify any protection. Edit Having examined the article closely I endorse the IP's removal as a valid good-faith application of WP:BLP and have left a note on the talk page. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:51, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Blocked user keeps editing page through rolling IP. Sro23 (talk) 12:25, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Lectonar (talk) 13:43, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ongoing IP block evasion by User:Who R U?
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

The dummy keeps acting like there was never a rule that an s-ending name with z-sound wasn't supposed to just end with an apostrophe and no additional s even though that's how we learned it in school. 2600:100E:B13C:A526:79FE:B84:EC0F:E80D (talk) 12:29, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You should be blocked for your attacks on other editors. The rules of grammar are clear here: either form is acceptable (and yes, I have looked). Personally I agree with you - the shorter form is what I was taught and what I'd always use - but the erudite handbooks of grammar support both, and so there's no justification to edit-war over it. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:51, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
OK, @Andy Dingley:. But then that raises 2 questions:
1. Why were we not taught about the option in school?
2. Even if the changeover is made, then what's the supposed "advantage" of changing it back? 2600:100E:B13C:A526:79FE:B84:EC0F:E80D (talk) 12:56, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
An editor can be simultaneously correct, yet disruptive.
WP faces a huge problem - how to manage the vast range of conflicting opinions of so many editors. So we favour objective sourcing over inclusion of all possible truths (on average, we're better off without something than with things which are unsupportable, even if they turn out to be true). We have WP:ENGVAR to avoid arguments over language variants, even at the cost of less than ideal choice of language. In this case, neither form is definitively wrong (I wish one was, I personally think it's ugly) and so there is no justification to be disruptive over it.
So far your actions of repeated reverts and attacks on other editors put you clearly into the disruptive category. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:08, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
In response to your question 1 above, you will need to go back to your teachers and ask them why they didn't teach you all the possible exceptions/options to the rules. We can speculate on why they didn't teach you the option. One possibility, it is easier to teach one variation of the rule and stick to that rather than trying to make sure students understand multiple variations and might get confused. Another possibility is that the teacher was only taught the one variation and never learned the other options so that is what they taught. You need to back off and accept that you might not know everything. If someone reverts you when you make an edit, calmly ask them why so that you can understand. If you continue down the path you are on I could see you getting blocked. -- GB fan 13:27, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks, Andy and GB. But even if I hadn't made a personal attack, then why is it supposedly "disruptive" to change the punctuation to match what our schools taught? And what "advantage" should there be to returning it back to the previous condition even though that doesn't roll the edit-history "clock" back any? 2600:100E:B127:A8DC:36AA:207A:EB3B:DDFE (talk) 2:37 pm, Today (UTC+1)
Re-adding IP comment after page rollback -- samtar talk or stalk 13:40, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Deli nk (talk) 13:45, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. IP blocked for 72 hours; no other IPs are making bad faith edits. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:48, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Ritchie333: Thanks for blocking 2.37.210.111. However, previously another IP, 2.35.210.246 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) was doing the exactly same thing, so I suspect he'll just come back soon with another. Maybe it's worth it to just wait and see, though - your call. Deli nk (talk) 13:52, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The trouble is, the subnet they are using is too large to range block, as it will make an unacceptable amount of collateral damage. We'll just have to wait and see what else happens. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:53, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism from New user.--SaməkTalk 10:40, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Just one user. Lectonar (talk) 11:04, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent addition of opinion and attempts to remove reference to psychological contributors and controversy surrounding the syndrome. Dubbinu | t | c 14:10, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please continue discussion on the talk page. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:59, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Shifting IP block evasion. McGeddon (talk) 14:31, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Manger, meet dog. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:02, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppetry by Charliewolf79, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Charliewolf79. JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 10:09, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:42, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppetry by Charliewolf79, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Charliewolf79. JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 10:09, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:43, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Excess addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content by IP's and anonymous editors, who are controlling the page with fan-cited edits. livelikemusic talk! 12:22, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There are some good faith IP edits on the article, so pending changes is more appropriate Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:44, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LG-Gunther :  Talk  02:40, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 07:31, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent Addition of Hoaxes as User:Brianmagallano IP Sock. LG-Gunther :  Talk  02:43, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 07:31, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: IP vandalism and BLP violations. Vensco (T / C) 03:05, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 07:33, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Long term issues with unsourced/poorly sourced additions, which resumed not long after the most recent semi-protection expired. Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:48, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Just one user adding things after the last protection expired; warn and report appropriately, but remember it could be a clueless newbie . Lectonar (talk) 07:35, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. George Ho (talk) 04:22, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:36, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP user who keeps changing their IP is blatantly disregarding MOS:TMRULES after multiple warnings. Gestrid (talk) 04:37, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:37, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated agenda-driven editing without suitable citations. Dubbinu | t | c 07:13, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 07:37, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. An IP remove a gallery in the article frequency! I asked him to debate in It's talk page or in talk page of the article several times. But it remove my requests! So, I ask you to protect the article then I can add more pictures of the competition. Thank you. Sarbaze naja (talk) 16:25, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this is my second time because at past time, an admin asked me to talk to the IP. I comment in his talk page several times but It doesn't care! Please check this request one more time. Thank you.Sarbaze naja (talk) 16:53, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined This is a content dispute; we do not protect pages to solve content disputes. If there is consensus at the talk page but IP continues to revert against consensus, they should be reported to WP:3RRN Lectonar (talk) 07:13, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Although there is no latest name warring or dispute on the article title, this article needs protection due to history of the title dispute. George Ho (talk) 20:24, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. If there is an actual move-war we can protect at a pinch. Lectonar (talk) 07:19, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. 117Avenue (talk) 22:17, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:20, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – One of the vandalised articles out here. These IP vandals are back soon after the previous protection expired. . Krimuk|90 (talk) 01:32, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:16, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Shifting-IP edit warrior. McGeddon (talk) 10:02, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:18, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion, Filipz123. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 12:58, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, seems to have stopped.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:48, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion, Filipz123. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 12:59, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, seems to have stopped.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:49, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP block evasion resuming. McGeddon (talk) 09:52, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:56, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:23, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Lectonar (talk) 07:30, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:24, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Lectonar (talk) 07:31, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Constant vandalism over the last week by the same user. Also help to mass revert edits by user 173.90.62.237 please. BillyBatty (talk) 02:46, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:32, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —MRD2014 (formerly Qpalzmmzlapq) T C 20:22, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:19, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Low-grade but persistent vandalism - as the worst team in the NL, vandals seem compelled to add some reference to their team or favorite player on every Braves loss. BilCat (talk) 23:19, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:24, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – BLP problems. Seems to be coming from a small range. So either protection or a block on 108.39.175.0/24 would probably do the trick. Majora (talk) 23:47, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:24, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Continuous violations of WP:BLP over the course of several months by IP hopping vandal. Sro23 (talk) 00:22, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:26, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Recent spat of editors denying or trivialising sexual violence, something which is usually treated very seriously when I look at the sanctions put on such edits at Mattress Performance (Carry That Weight) '''tAD''' (talk) 01:29, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:29, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Dispute over wording. Both parties appear to have breached WP:3RR. clpo13(talk) 15:53, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected by EdJohnston for 5 days. tutterMouse (talk) 05:23, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: persistent disruptive editing, adding POV, OR. Interested parties have been edit warring over this article for years (see [24], [25], [26], [27]). Quis separabit? 19:36, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:14, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatedly recreated by sock accounts of Supreme Genghis Khan (talk · contribs). Most recent sock account was Russell Wilson the Superior Quarterback (talk · contribs). Vensco (T / C) 03:45, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Widr (talk) 06:42, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. nyuszika7h (talk) 14:21, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 19:29, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I have asked time and time again for Vans to be protected, and it keeps being vandalized and being reverted. Please, just protect it already. Pending mode isnt helpful! . CoolCanuck eh? 19:14, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what you expect from pending changes, but it's doing its job. IPs edit, the edits don't go live, and often get reverted by a bot. Essentially, the article remains unvandalized for public viewieng. And it is not even high frequency vandalism. Oh, and that is Declined Lectonar (talk) 19:26, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Europefan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). GABgab 21:53, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 22:19, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: The page is currently semi-protected right now, but will expire on June 17. I can guarantee that IPs will keep vandalizing the page once the protection expires. So please increase the protection to indefinite semi-protection to prevent this from happening. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 17:37, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, if they reappear please request protection after June 17.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:27, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Long-term disruptive editing, presumably by a single or a couple of IPs, presistently reverting all editing without ever providing a single reason. No such user (talk) 21:00, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 22:23, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – From 2a02:c7f:3805:400:d8f:c4d0:ba86:555c (talk · contribs · WHOIS). Also severe WP:BLP violations. Vensco (T / C) 21:43, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 22:21, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – All edits over the past week or so have been socks or people reverting socks. Since this list is comprehensive already and covers the 1990s, there is extremely low traffic of actual improvements to the article, but it is the target of a long-term vandal targeting Green Day related information. This has received two weeks semi this year already, but the vandalism persists. ~ RobTalk 21:57, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 22:17, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs. Majora (talk) 22:02, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 22:15, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

07 June 2016

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations. Mdann52 (talk) 16:13, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. That was more than a week ago; I have watchlisted. Lectonar (talk) 16:31, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Page is repeatedly recreated. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 17:27, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The page has been moved to a draft page after a request at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion; no need to protect just now, as there is no imminent danger of recreation. Lectonar (talk) 17:29, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:21, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 20:31, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - IP changing birthplace - unsanctioned force JG Malmsimp (talk) 15:07, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Just one IP lately Lectonar (talk) 15:31, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 17:49, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 18:03, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – There have been many moves back and forth between this and Sally Metcalfe, namely the last one by me, as well as the moves by Canon2015a, 5 albert square, Madbane54, AnemoneProjectors, and SpongeAhoy. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 19:31, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done SarahSV (talk) 20:12, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated addition of unsourced content / edit warring by multiple IPs. Jim1138 (talk) 17:48, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 17:58, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, which I don't expect to stop anytime soon because people think they're very clever by adding List of sexually active popes to the "See Also" section in reference to http://xkcd.com/1690. --Abcorntalk 17:55, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 17:59, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – urgent protection needed . Fuortu (talk) 17:56, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 18:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism.--Bozalegenda (talk) 13:45, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:53, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wikipelli Talk 14:03, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:05, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Gnome de plume (talk) 15:35, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 15:40, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:11, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined As this is a biography of someone who has recently died, information will change rapidly and any errors will generally be quickly ironed out, so full-protection is counter-productive. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:16, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: I don't know, but I am seeing reverts lately; one is some kind of disruptive edit. George Ho (talk) 06:40, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I can only see two unconfirmed edits in the past week that I would definitely class as vandalism or BLP violations, and one of those could be explained away by being a test edit from someone who does not speak English as a first language. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:18, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP edit warring - looks like they could be editors editing logged out?. -- samtar talk or stalk 08:03, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Just noticed the previous protection expired on the 4th of this month -- samtar talk or stalk 08:05, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:27, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Player is reportedly being transferred to another team but nothing official has been announced. IP addresses and new users are changing his team without any official announcement. . GoPurple'nGold24 10:10, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:46, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Please SALT this and Dr. Sandeep Guleria as page for Sandeep Guleria is being repeatedly recreated. Thanks. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 09:06, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:21, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 09:38, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 09:45, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Article has been semi-protected since 2008 due to sockpuppetry. It's been almost eight years since protection, so I guess it would be good to give unprotection a try given that it's likely that the sock master is gone. Protecting admin has been inactive since 2010, while Collectonian is no longer active. Should sockpuppetry resume, reprotect immediately. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:43, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Somewhat; I have downgraded to pending-changes level 1. Will watchlist and we will see. Lectonar (talk) 11:36, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistant vandalism from jumping IP, may be solved with a range block but requesting page protection in the mean time. . --Cameron11598 (Talk) 06:55, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 06:57, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @Widr: --Cameron11598 (Talk) 06:59, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Has been CSD'd 4 times in the last 8 days. Yellow Dingo (talk) 08:48, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 08:50, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther :  Talk  09:06, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:20, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Past couple of days upsurge in vandalism. In veritas (talk) 00:43, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 02:12, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Amccann421 (talk) 03:26, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 06:29, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This page was fully protected in 2006. I do not understand why this page needs to be so highly protected. Semi-protection should be enough to keep out the bad guys. Mr. Guye (talk) 03:08, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Mr. Guye: (Non-administrator comment) The article Banter redirects to Conversation, which is currently not protected. Vensco (T / C) 03:27, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not done, please contact the protecting admin on their talk page, and let me know if you do not receive a response. Thanks, Nakon 02:16, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP Vandalism likely to get much worse tomorrow. Michael Sheflin (talk) 22:40, 6 June 2016 (UTC) [| vandalized page] (Michael Sheflin (talk) 22:54, 6 June 2016 (UTC))[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 23:52, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Seven unsourced edits by IP user. Have given warnings, no effect.   Aloha27  talk  23:38, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. AlexiusHoratius 23:58, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IPv6 vandalism/disruptive editing. Vensco (T / C) 02:38, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (non-admin closure) Vensco (T / C) 03:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – rash of reverts needed in recent days. Testpored (talk) 16:21, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 02:05, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – PCPP added 4 May 2016. Since that time, article edits have all been persistent vandalism and reversions of vandalism.

Requesting protection level be increased to WP:EC-P due to consistent vandalism from IP hopper. See also Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive925#Unabated disruptive editing by IP jumper and Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive922#Potentially connected IP editors. AldezD (talk) 19:43, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. EC-P is not authorized for this article. Nakon 02:06, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IP addresses involved with adding same disruptive material to character descriptions for this TV show. MPFitz1968 (talk) 23:06, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 02:07, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Target of User:Taiki0409 sockpuppets who repeatedly insert hoax information about a supposed King of Fighters series starring Filipino actors. Blake Gripling (talk) 23:14, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 02:08, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:40, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 02:11, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IPv6 address block evasion again... Vensco (T / C) 00:11, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 02:11, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent addition of unsourced and dubious content, and editor refuses to discuss. Note that while I have reverted more than three times in a 24-hour window, reverting BLP violations is an exemption. . Opencooper (talk) 01:18, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Barek. Nakon 02:12, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent POV disruption by IP: source removal, POV pushing, poor grammar, etc... Athenean (talk) 01:24, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 02:14, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An anon from Bosnia and Herzegovina has tried to hijack the page twice over the past half hour. I will create the appropriate second page when I return from work later in the day. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:33, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Seems to have stopped. Only two users here, both surely the same person. Report to WP:AIV if they continue MusikAnimal talk 21:22, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: Temporary WP:BLP discussion. Violation of WP:AVOIDVICTIM.--Takahiro4 (talk) 16:59, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Edit warring stopped on 4 June MusikAnimal talk 21:27, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Dkendr (talk) 18:45, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Dkendr: Unfortunately, talk-pages can't be pending changes protected. On a sidenote: against what would you need the protection precisely? The last edit it would have prevented if implementable was in December 2012... Lectonar (talk) 18:55, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – User talk pages are not protected except in response to severe or continued vandalism. MusikAnimal talk 21:27, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Slow edit warring occurring. See article talk page for details. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 19:02, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined User has been warned. Please report to WP:ANEW if they continue MusikAnimal talk 21:28, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Racial issues on page abundant. Kaobear (talk) 20:02, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MusikAnimal talk 21:29, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:52, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 23:51, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of unsourced edits to a BLP. Qed237 (talk) 22:56, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 23:54, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Several different IPs have been blocked but it continues.

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:08, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 23:36, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 23:59, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

08 June 2016

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Recent and current disruptive, BLP edits. Mlpearc (open channel) 23:10, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 19:40, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes protection (level 1): High level of unconstructive, inappropriate edits. Many editors here, including ip, don't care about adding legitimate, sourced examples, but constantly add (basically the same, over and over again) inappropriate examples. One ip even removed the guidelines that I had written for inclusion. Protection is needed. --1990'sguy (talk) 01:42, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 19:46, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPv6 same /64 range as before that led to last protect - talk page vandalism. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:44, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I am rather loath to protect a talk page longer. Lectonar (talk) 19:47, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Binksternet (talk) 06:36, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 19:31, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – A number of recent rumors regarding this celebrity have resulted in an uptick of BLP-violating edits from non-autoconfirmed editors. PC might be an alternative. Might also move protect as well given there's a claimed name change in the rumors. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 18:17, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 19:33, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 19:13, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 19:35, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing and addition of unsourced/speculative content. Amccann421 (talk) 19:14, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 19:36, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruption from both IP and new accounts. Qed237 (talk) 19:33, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 19:34, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Used almost exclusively for test pages, deleted 7 times. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 01:54, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I think this serves a rather useful function: allowing test edits which are in draftspace. Looking at the edits, it has been used very deliberately to do just that. If another admin wants to protect, go ahead. Lectonar (talk) 09:25, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Lectonar: We do have Draft:Sandbox already so it does seem redundant to an existing place to make test edits in draftspace, maybe a protected redirect instead? tutterMouse (talk) 13:22, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@TutterMouse: Hmmm...I thought of that, but I think as as a newbie, maybe with English not being my first language, I would go for something labeled "test" before looking for a "sandbox". But as I said, I do not really mind one way or the other, I just do not see a dire need to protect this :). Thanks for the heads-up; and thanks for your feedback. I always am glad when you're around RFP. Lectonar (talk) 13:34, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – single sentence "Abhishek aryabhatt is a indian film director". OnionRing (talk) 14:13, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Lectonar (talk) 18:13, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. The last time I've asked for a temporary semi-protection, and it was good until the semi-protection lasted; but now lots of unregistered users and non-confirmed users start to change again the article without trustful sources or redundant sources (someones even without sources). This happened 3 times in this year, I would propose (if it's possible) if this page can be protected for a longer amount of time. --HardstyleGB (talk) 17:32, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 17:38, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Giubbotto non ortodosso. Binksternet (talk) 18:07, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I know there's WP:BANREVERT (if that's truly applicable here), but block evasion aside the edit seems constructive and appropriate. I can't say for sure if it's block evasion anyway, so I'm not inclined to protect MusikAnimal talk 22:56, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Block evasion it may be (and personal attacks in edit-summaries aside), the info seems correct. Lectonar (talk) 09:20, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:33, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. IP 182...is blocked; the rest seems manageable. Please relist if it picks up. Lectonar (talk) 09:11, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by User talk:144.36.207.230 even after repeated warnings. If possible please block ip 144.36.207.230 from making further edits Arjunkrishna90 (talk) 14:11, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 15:15, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism. -NottNott|talk 14:42, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 15:14, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The subject is currently featured in a number of articles - high activity and quite a few new IPs who are unable to grasp policy. Distrait cognizance (talk) 20:43, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Out of the last 30-40 edits, about 3 were vandalism; this is under control. Lectonar (talk) 08:39, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations – Clearly now a target for antisemites, I just removed some antisemetic comments and BLP violations, this will always be a target. Doug Weller talk 05:32, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:22, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Long-term SP requested because of repeated BLP-violations by IPs geolocating to Portugal, an IP-hopper who has been at it for years now (sample edit, for more see page history). Thomas.W talk 09:54, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 10:57, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:50, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:40, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent and repeated hoaxing by a certain sockpuppeteer, inserting factually incorrect listings for cartoon programmes. Blake Gripling (talk) 01:05, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 08:41, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. OnionRing (talk) 09:09, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Lectonar (talk) 09:11, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: The player is currently on the verge of a move to Manchester United but it has not yet been completed. Currently receiving a large number of IP edits changing information prematurely as well as some vandalism. Kosack (talk) 19:40, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Protection not required for the redirect. The page has been moved to Eric Bailly and semi-protected for one week by Mattythewhite.Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:29, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Distrait cognizance (talk) 20:46, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MusikAnimal talk 04:35, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Persistent inappropriate user edits despite instructions to stop. JoeHebda • (talk) 02:34, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. MusikAnimal talk 04:36, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. ChamithN (talk) 04:47, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 05:06, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent reverting of correct official English name under bogus grounds.Piznajko (talk) 02:28, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected Semi won't do anything here. Discuss and if consensus permits make a move request MusikAnimal talk 04:38, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 03:47, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 04:37, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 04:45, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Probably worthy of a longer duration MusikAnimal talk 04:57, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request autoconfirmed for 1 year. Only an extreme minority of non-autoconfirmed edits are actually constructive. Rest are people (kids?) who think adding themselves to list makes them "h4x0rz". -- dsprc [talk] 21:57, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --slakrtalk / 03:21, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 23:51, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. IPs blocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:55, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There seems to be a recent spate of xkcd related vandalism (the topic is also a bit of a vandal-magnet, for obvious reasons). Intelligentsium 00:48, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --slakrtalk / 03:23, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Persistent use of talk page as workspace, despite being blocked. Binksternet (talk) 17:36, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed talk page access for the duration of the block. -- GB fan 17:39, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not done No protection necessary MusikAnimal talk 22:50, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Keeps getting sparse vandalism from registered accounts. Would benefit if the talk page was protected like the main page. QEDK (T C) 18:40, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Pending changes is only for the mainspace. Disruption seems too infrequent to warrant other forms of protection MusikAnimal talk 22:53, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:16, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done --slakrtalk / 03:13, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – All of the individual season pages are indef semi; this template has been slowly being disrupted by an ip editor. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 22:08, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and watchlisted. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:05, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —MRD2014 T C 01:15, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ricky81682. for three days. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:10, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – He and Yordano Ventura brawled tonight. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:17, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ricky81682. for three days. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:09, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term disruption from Sicily IPs. Binksternet (talk) 18:58, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Already pending change protected by Malcolmxl5 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) until August 20 of this year. IP edits haven't been exclusively disruptive (though most have been). I defer to the current protection level here. Airplaneman 20:31, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. IP has been blocked for two weeks for block evasion. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:54, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of vandalism using hate speech symbol described in article. ViperSnake151  Talk  19:55, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator CIreland.. Semi-protected for two weeks. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:59, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:19, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Mattythewhite. for two weeks. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:01, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 23:21, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days by MusikAnimal., after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:50, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lots of recurring and long term abusive editing by a gang of IPs. Essentially defamatory collective edits. WP:BLP. 7&6=thirteen () 23:38, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:04, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -- The Voidwalker Discuss 00:33, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:52, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term disruption from Sicily IPs. Binksternet (talk) 18:58, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 22:58, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism of some IPs. We put the sponsorship name of the teams in parenthesis as Eurocup and the they change this to vandalize Vasconia (talk)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 22:45, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 23:36, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:41, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

09 June 2016

Temporary semi-protection: - IP vandalism.BabbaQ (talk) 17:34, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 19:40, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
What the hey?? There is no "IP vandalism" here. There is a legitimate disagreement among editors, with a rational discussion happening on the article talk page. There is also a request for comments on a related project page. Both were initiated by the "IP". That's hardly vandalism. BabbaQ should be reprimanded for grossly misrepresenting the situation. 32.218.41.207 (talk) 20:16, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – There are persistent attempts to insert unreferenced fancruft into this article. In particular some people seem obsessed with the "flag referendum" (which the podcast did a while ago) and want to elevate this into something significant rather than an interesting but non-notable thing that a podcast did and which has no RS coverage. DanielRigal (talk) 19:42, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:57, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create-protection: Repeatedly recreated as spam by socks (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Editor2626744) Grayfell (talk) 19:57, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of indefinite., after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Both pages protected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:22, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some IP seems to object to everything on the page (including the categories!) and despite repeated warnings etc they've still not visited the TP, Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 14:45, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined That is weeks apart, actually, so page protection is not the way to go....have an old fashioned: just watchlist and revert, and be patient. Perhaps one of these days the IP will use the talk-page. Lectonar (talk) 15:35, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Lectonar - That's not the point ... It's one IP blanking the entire article and not bothering to discuss and that's enough justification for protecting and protecting would force them to discuss it ? ... It's a waste of time on us editors reverting this shit when someone like you can simply help and just protect it... –Davey2010Talk 16:41, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree...he is patient enough to wait for weeks without reverting, so will just outwait any protection. But I will retire my decline. Perhaps another admin will protect. Lectonar (talk) 17:07, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., let us try pending changes--Ymblanter (talk) 19:00, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Lectonar for striking and thanks Ymblanter for adding pending changes :) –Davey2010Talk 19:23, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Ip hopper. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 17:14, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 19:38, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See User:EvergreenFir/sandbox#NBC.2FCBS.2C_1970s.2C_BBC_lists_of_programs_TV_vandal_-_Philippines. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 17:26, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 19:38, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:46, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected--Ymblanter (talk) 19:01, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – This page has been through the gamut of protections - Would not request indefinite pending changes without good cause, I think the best step to preventing the disruptive editing and addition of unsourced material is to add PC protection. Garchy (talk) 16:16, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:07, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper keeps blanking content. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 17:40, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:02, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Ebyabe talk - Opposites Attract09:35, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Only 2 IPs involved. Lectonar (talk) 11:15, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:11, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 11:51, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The article being featured as a Google doodle has caused a lot of IP vandalism, which I imagine will abate shortly - requesting a short term protection. -- samtar talk or stalk 15:52, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 15:56, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Talk page discussion with support for move. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:28, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Move protection downgraded to semi. Lectonar (talk) 09:56, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Further disruption after the protection expired. John of Reading (talk) 05:50, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:42, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent, long-term vandalism. Pending changes did not prevent vandalism and vandalism continued after PC was removed. Further steps need to be taken. Regards, James (talk/contribs) 06:58, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Actually pending changes did what it was supposed to do: preventing the vandalism to become visible. The vandalism here is low-level, so I have reinstated pending-changes. Lectonar (talk) 07:44, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – IP users keep adding info that violates BLP policies. MorbidEntree - (Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥) 07:41, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:44, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The IP user who disruptively kept editing (after multiple warnings) Kirby: Planet Robobot until it was protected has appeared on The Legend of Zelda (2017 video game) and has edited the page in the exact same way he did on Kirby. He will likely continue to do so in violation of WP:TMRULES. (It's Wikipedia's Geolocate feature that gave them away. All the IP addresses that recently edited Kirby came from the same location as the IP address that edited this one.). Gestrid (talk) 22:12, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Please consider requesting an edit filter to prevent these specific types of edits. Thanks, Nakon 03:19, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive edits by anon IP. Vjmlhds 22:51, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Nakon 03:19, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopper adding a WP:OFFTOPIC hatnote to the article (not even properly formatted). This appears to have turned into a disruptive game with me. Iryna Harpy (talk) 03:19, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 03:24, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ongoing attempts by IPs to delete sourced material, no response to requests to enter into discussion. Twice today, been going on for weeks. Nat Gertler (talk) 20:45, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Just one IP. Lectonar (talk) 20:46, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No, not just one IP. At least five different IPs over the past three weeks. --Nat Gertler (talk) 22:45, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 02:53, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism, blanking template. Garchy (talk) 21:11, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 02:53, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Well, the IP is back at it a day after the protection expires. Again. –Compassionate727 (T·C) 22:11, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. Nakon 03:01, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Rangeblocked for a week. Nakon 03:12, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Idefinite semi-protection: Long term issues with disruptive edits, and the article has previously been semi-protected for six months. Snuggums (talk / edits) 22:51, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Pending changes seems to be working fine; only three IP edits in the last week. Katietalk 03:05, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. OptimusView (talk) 18:13, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. And far from high-level. Lectonar (talk) 19:44, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Pending Changes Protection: Generic – New Element about to be named Tennessine PC until its approved. Bobherry Userspace Talk to me! Stuff I have done 00:36, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. kelapstick(bainuu) 02:42, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: About to be Renamed. . Bobherry Userspace Talk to me! Stuff I have done 00:37, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. MusikAnimal talk 02:29, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: About to be Renamed. Bobherry Userspace Talk to me! Stuff I have done 00:39, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. MusikAnimal talk 02:29, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: About to be renamed. Bobherry Userspace Talk to me! Stuff I have done 00:39, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. kelapstick(bainuu) 02:39, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Empty nose syndrome

Doc James wrongly punishes new editors to the article by falsely, without proof associating them with an alleged off-wiki call to edit. I have no affiliation with that post or website. Recent editors to the article, jytdog and Dubbin, in particular have marginalized new editors. This is evident in the Talk section. Please remove all protection. Greybridge (talk) 01:58, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done It looks like proof was included in the edit summary, your account will be autoconfirmed in two days, at which time the semiprotection will not apply to your account. kelapstick(bainuu) 02:37, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. TwoTwoHello (talk) 23:36, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 03:20, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 23:37, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 03:23, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This page has had past periods of both semi-protection and pending changes. Neither have deterred the socking. The vandalism consists of repeatedly adding false information related to charts/certifications. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Никита-Родин-2002 for more details. ~ RobTalk 00:27, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 03:24, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 18:00, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 18:07, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... kelapstick(bainuu) 04:49, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping. Adding unsourced, likely false future programming info. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 20:29, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 02:52, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism from multiple IPs most likely coming from fans of the Texas Rangers with whom the Astros are currently playing a series with. Screenshots of such vandalism are being posted on Reddit for amusement purposes. This series will continue for at least today and tomorrow, and I expect to see more vandalism occur if not protected. Brian Reading (talk) 21:55, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 02:53, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism on the page. Elisfkc (talk) 23:39, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 02:44, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article subject recently died and today alone many IP addresses have vandalized the article. Rockchalk717 18:11, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I do not see that much vandalism, what I see is rather heavy editing, also by IPs. But far from all edits are vandalism. Lectonar (talk) 19:43, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. --Kansas Bear (talk) 01:36, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of seven days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 02:40, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some short-term vandalism the past few hours. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:26, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of seven days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 02:41, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

US Democratic primaries

Temporary semi-protection: With conflicting and rapidly-changing news reports on this primary day, several IP or new accounts are changing vote counts without considering longstanding consensus sources. — JFG talk 21:19, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Somewhat stale now, and highly watched to boot. Lectonar (talk) 19:30, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 06:47, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Has died down after warnings. Lectonar (talk) 19:32, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: Repeated inserting of copy-written material by IPs. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 17:49, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 19:32, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from IP users. Amccann421 (talk) 19:07, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 19:37, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. (Adding spam links) Opencooper (talk) 20:17, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 20:25, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – disruptive editing from IP users - subject of article has recently been in news. Garchy (talk) 21:14, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) perhaps a temp pending change protection would work for this article. There has been some constructive IP edits the past few days. -- LuK3 (Talk) 22:34, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 23:22, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

10 June 2016

Temporary semi-protection: persistent vandalism.LM2000 (talk) 20:53, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 21:16, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Two IPs are have a edit war on this page. Krj373*(talk), *(contrib) 21:01, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 21:17, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:02, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. a few hours by another admin. AlexiusHoratius 21:18, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:10, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

{{RFPP}} I don't see the subject's name in the source, making the disputed content a BLP violation that should be removed MusikAnimal talk 19:53, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I misread MusikAnimal talk 20:15, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WWE Rivalries closed as redirect, page repeatedly recreated.LM2000 (talk) 00:09, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:36, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive editing from several IP editors. Israel's Son 00:58, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:43, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Unconstructive edits from several different IPs. Strawberry4Ever (talk) 02:52, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Admins please provide some temporary protection to this article. Vandalism is creeping up with all the global attention on his public funeral. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 20:20, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:38, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Amccann421 (talk) 03:26, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:46, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unsourced changes are regularly being made that contradict the existing sources. Random86 (talk) 20:07, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:41, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of large amounts of copyrighted material and OR by an IP who has been warned about it before. The pages were semi-protected from 31 March to 7 April 2016, and the IP had resumed since then. Richard75 (talk) 21:16, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 19:51, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Constant vandalism of statistics section by user with varying IP addresses. Was previously protected for one week until 8 June 2016 and since the protection expired the user has vandalised the statistics section twice. Please protect the page for longer this time (ideally at least one month). Thanks, VG31-irl 18:38, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:13, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by anon IPs. Accireioj (talk) 8:31, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Consistent vandalism since last protection expired MusikAnimal talk 19:49, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Exemplo347 (talk) 22:41, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 14:22, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Lots of new accounts seem to like to spam this page with advertising or copyvio from commercial sites. Montanabw(talk) 23:17, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 14:23, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Anon IP and new accounts are frequently adding advertising spamlinks to this article. Montanabw(talk) 23:40, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 14:23, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Mdrnpndr (talk) 12:54, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 14:05, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Favourite target of banned editor Fangusu. Came off three months' protection 4 days ago and their socks are already back. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 16:58, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 17:02, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: POV-pushing edit warring by IPs has resumed just days after the last protection expired.Cúchullain t/c 00:20, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of One year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Did so before I saw this report. —SpacemanSpiff 16:05, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry - Target of User:Taiki0409 sockpuppets who repeatedly insert hoax and vandalism information about a supposed King of Fighters series starring Filipino actors. LG-Gunther :  Talk  04:40, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Katietalk 15:55, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Player is speculation of transfer rumours and is having his club incorrectly changed constantly.Danieletorino2 (talk) 07:24, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 15:22, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IPs repeatedly removing material based on the fact that there is a (currently unsourced or unverifified) rumour that the line-up wil be changing (again). Muffled Pocketed 11:29, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Ritchie333. Katietalk 15:52, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Urgent BLP. Subject has been implicated in a very serious crime and users are breaking the law by calling him guilty. '''tAD''' (talk) 15:03, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 15:08, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – some vandalism after being drafted first overall . Joeykai (talk) 23:49, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 14:24, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Long-term IP vandalism. Mostly confusing his roles on Supernatural and The Walking Dead with reality. Ebyabe talk - Repel All Boarders06:20, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 14:28, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – After having submitted a request for page protection a couple of days ago, the IP hopper (same location every time) is still continuing to revert the moment I do. I'm getting tired of having my time wasted. The individual doing this doesn't look as if they're going to stop this, and I don't want to end up with 100 reverts showing up as the only activity on the page history of an article that doesn't appear to have any other editors watching it. Iryna Harpy (talk) 10:26, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 14:29, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – some vandalism after being drafted first overall . Joeykai (talk) 23:49, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 14:24, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Long-term IP vandalism. Mostly confusing his roles on Supernatural and The Walking Dead with reality. Ebyabe talk - Repel All Boarders06:20, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 14:28, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – After having submitted a request for page protection a couple of days ago, the IP hopper (same location every time) is still continuing to revert the moment I do. I'm getting tired of having my time wasted. The individual doing this doesn't look as if they're going to stop this, and I don't want to end up with 100 reverts showing up as the only activity on the page history of an article that doesn't appear to have any other editors watching it. Iryna Harpy (talk) 10:26, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 14:29, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism from multiple IPs. Jim1138 (talk) 09:54, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Widr (talk) 14:06, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sixth of March 11:47, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 11:49, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: As per The Fall (band); continuing webrumour of splits, divorces etc. Both articles facing edtwarring IPs. Muffled Pocketed 12:18, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Ritchie333 for 24 hours. tutterMouse (talk) 14:09, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 20:28, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:34, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Crap edits still getting through with pending changes configured. Montanabw(talk) 05:55, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined PC is working. Edits are not going live unless they are accepted. Widr (talk) 06:27, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sixth of March 11:47, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 11:49, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Basically all recent edits have been socks and reversions of socks. Deliberate misinformation on charts and certifications is being added. ~ RobTalk 04:41, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 06:04, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Just a day or two semi will be enough. Recently finished game I guess, and all IPs are streaming in to edit (all IP edits have been reverted). Xender Lourdes (talk) 07:25, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:30, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Austin Zehnder

Page should be replaced with a redirect to Sexual assault of Savannah Dietrich. The convicted perpetrator's name is a plausible search term and this treatment accords with WP:BLP1E and WP:CRIME. The protecting admin User:Beeblebrox is taking a break from Wikipedia. -Carwil (talk) 18:46, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done This has been sitting here for more than 2 days; obviously no one willing to do what you want, so this is more a procedural "not done". Lectonar (talk) 07:46, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
What does that mean? Does the listing stay here until someone provides a substantive response? Or, is page protection really at the personal discretion of people with protection privileges? Please explain.--Carwil (talk) 17:17, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No one has agreed to your request, so the status-quo is unchanged. The "not done" above will allow archiving. Have you tried to talk to the protecting admin, Beeblebrox. He was active in May, so might be around. Lectonar (talk) 17:25, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

11 June 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Amccann421 (talk) 17:53, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The underlying PC protection should remain in place when the semi-protection expires. MelanieN (talk) 20:56, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Shahin (talk) 18:30, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:59, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article has been getting a ton of vandalism recently, and when I look at every revision since PC was permanently implemented in 2013, a sweeping majority of edits by non-autoconfirmed users (~99%) were reverted as vandalism. I think this should just be upgraded to indefinite semi-protection, since both the long-term history and the lack of constructive edits are there. –Compassionate727 (T·C) 19:46, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The current level of vandalism is certainly too frequent for PC. Let's try semi for a year. The PC protection will remain in place after the semi-protection expires; let's see what the situation is then. MelanieN (talk) 21:05, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: reverts by IP who ignores on going Talk page debates. Borsoka (talk) 20:02, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:09, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by Who R U? (talk · contribs). clpo13(talk) 20:33, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:11, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: An rotating IP6 address in North Carolina has repeatedly committed the same vandalism to this article over the last few days (June 6, 9 and 10) and subsequently been blocked. They also hit various other articles with anti-Semitic crap but they usually start with this one so I'm hoping a temporary semi-protect will slow down them down next cycle. Thanks. Krelnik (talk) 17:17, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We all know how effective it is to block a rotating IP. MelanieN (talk) 20:15, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Continued vandalism since 5 June 2016. --Kansas Bear (talk) 17:31, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:40, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. STSC (talk) 17:49, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:42, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and addition of unsourced content. livelikemusic talk! 12:34, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:58, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Longterm edit-warring by IPs about Leandros's year of birth. Dr. K. 14:12, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:00, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection Lerner delivered a eulogy at Ali's memorial yesterday, and the IP vandalism has been practically non-stop since then. Please semi-protect the article for a few days until the trolls move on to something else. — MShabazz Talk/Stalk 16:46, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:03, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Yeepsi (talk) 16:59, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I see that PC protection was tried earlier and recently expired, but even when it was in place it doesn't seem to have helped much. MelanieN (talk) 20:06, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Who R U?. clpo13(talk) 18:37, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 18:40, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Who R U?. clpo13(talk) 18:37, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 18:39, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Same IP editor attacking page again. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 19:39, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:53, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User:Langarhouse is going to rain down a series of attacks on me, like one of his last socks did. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:48, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Persistent vandalism – User:Kailash29792 is doing false accusations on me. Langarhouse (talk) 12:02, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Langarhouse, please stay off of Kailash29792's talk page as requested. NeilN talk to me 12:49, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Th page was being vandalized by a user called Obi2canibe . Kush sinhala (talk) 14:14, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Kush sinhala, please read WP:NOTVAND NeilN talk to me 14:21, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent, long-term vandalism from anonymous editors. clpo13(talk) 17:23, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 17:57, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Long term vandalism by a proxy hopper ignoring registered users' request to justify edits on the talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1001:b01a:2c94:8d7:1621:1a6:bfe4 (talkcontribs) 23:58, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 11:04, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

full protection: Edit warring. Strebe (talk) 04:49, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Warned Redzemp about edit warring. Strebe, please mind 3RR yourself. Will protect/block if edit warring continues. NeilN talk to me 05:11, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LG-Gunther :  Talk  07:32, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:34, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther :  Talk  00:01, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 04:27, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther :  Talk  00:01, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 04:28, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther :  Talk  00:02, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 04:29, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Targeted by IP hopping sockpuppet that only discusses changes in edit summaries. Ebyabe talk - Attract and Repel07:19, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:44, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. clpo13(talk) 07:42, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pending 1 month. NeilN talk to me 07:46, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Content dispute. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:23, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:33, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Targeted by IP hopping sockpuppet that only discusses changes in edit summaries. Ebyabe talk - Attract and Repel07:19, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:38, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Targeted by IP hopping sockpuppet that only discusses changes in edit summaries. Ebyabe talk - Attract and Repel07:19, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:36, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: It has been semi-protected since 2009. Many years passed and we need to determine whether semi-protection is necessary. 59.6.78.88 (talk) 17:10, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected. I think semi-protection is necessary here. Area 51 is famous for its top-level secrecy and supposed "sightings," so I suspect that vandalism would resume immediately upon unprotection. I would welcome opinions from other editors/admins, though. Biblio (talk) 22:35, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed I tend to be more than a little suspicious when an IP with no edit history want to "determine whether semi-protection is necessary."--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 02:12, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Article's subject has recently been shot, and unsourced death rumors are repeatedly being added. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 05:39, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 05:43, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism started again as soon as the previous protection ended. Needs protecting for a longer spell. Egghead06 (talk) 05:49, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Malcolmxl5. NeilN talk to me 06:03, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Someone keeps removing the deletion tag. George Ho (talk) 05:58, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 06:03, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: - IP vandalism as usual.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:32, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 04:26, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Various IPs carrying on edit war, adding irrelevant images, and using talk page for personal attacks instead of replying to discussion requests. Dennis Bratland (talk) 04:38, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 04:46, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: for two months. WP:BLP article undergoing persistent disruptive editing from IPs Jytdog (talk) 04:43, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 04:58, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing and vandalism. Possibly part of a mass attack, his birth name keeps being changed to a fake name, unsourced claims about his personal life are made, etc. Sro23 (talk) 01:25, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 04:17, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive edits by IPs in the form of unsourced claims--Mr Fink (talk) 02:15, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 04:14, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent WP:BLP violations, unsourced changes in marriage status. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:19, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 04:15, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Changes to date of birth that contradict the reference given. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 02:27, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 04:13, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems to be a spate of IP vandalism again. Intelligentsium 02:47, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 04:12, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. Montanabw(talk) 02:31, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, seems to have stopped, apologies for not reacting earlier.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:44, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Page is experiencing constant inaccurate edits from random ip's, specifically considering the presumptive nominee of the party. Jp16103 12:15, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Jill Stein has been described as the presumptive nominee, so the additions are not completely inaccurate so as to merit protection. If possible, attempt dispute resolution. Biblio (talk) 22:18, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Ongoing content dispute, possible blp and spam referencing issues as well. Sro23 (talk) 21:42, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 22:21, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Toddst1 (talk) 22:35, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:34, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Given the high-profile of this judge at the moment because of the Brock Turner sentencing controversy, this article became a target vandals. Toddst1 (talk) 17:47, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not all IP edits seem to be vandalism, so I'm not sure this page merits the complete shutdown of such edits. I'm just PC protecting it for a week, and if problems continue you can post a new request. Thanks. Biblio (talk) 22:27, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Massive promo, gibberish etc by newcomers and anons. --Dэя-Бøяg 19:19, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 19:32, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Amccann421 (talk) 03:27, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Biblio (talk) 22:07, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – This module implements Template:Aligned table, which is already template-protected. 6000+ transclusions to top it off. — Andy W. (talk ·ctb) 03:43, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Biblio (talk) 22:11, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – All recent edits to this article by IP users have been reverted by subsequent users or bots as vandalism. KDS4444 (talk) 17:35, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Biblio (talk) 22:22, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

12 June 2016

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP edit warring in NPOV changes. Gaijin42 (talk) 02:18, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for now - user has received a final warning - report them to AIV if they continue. AlexiusHoratius 13:07, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. For edit warring. NeilN talk to me 16:31, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 16:11, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 16:25, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, editors continue to change his spouse to a male, no question that this is vandalism. I fear more to come because of the prominence of Miranda at the Tony Awards, held tonight (June 12, 2016). Flami72 (talk) 19:38, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 20:34, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 15:59, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 18:24, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Calidum ¤ 16:11, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:22, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Withing five hours of the last protection being lifted the premature addition of content has returned. Please lock the article until 1 July 2016 at 01:00 to avoid further edits like that. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:26, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done NeilN talk to me 16:29, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sock of blocked user Who_R_U seems a little upset. Temp. please?.   Aloha27  talk  10:29, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 11:02, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 14:24, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Page-move vandalism – Given the recent move vandalism done to this page, it should be fully move protected. It's not likely this page will be moved (for correct reasons) in the future anyway. Calidum ¤ 15:49, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 15:58, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Adam9007 (talk) 16:06, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:09, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporay semi-protection: Persistent pointless/disruptive edits by Italian user using multiple IPs. Recent warning to 87.13.107.226 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) ignored within 2 days. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 11:36, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pending changes two months. NeilN talk to me 13:42, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Breaking story. IPs putting up inflammatory edits like this and this. Lots of lives involved here, including the alleged gunman and his family. All falls under BLP. {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 13:59, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:07, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: This file is used in a sensitive page MediaWiki:Common.js/edit.js, but upload and move protection are wholly sufficient to satisfy the scope of keeping the file safe. Protecting admin has been inactive for a while. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 13:28, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected Please contact Anomie (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) and report back here if you do not receive a response. Thanks, Nakon 00:37, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I note that the edit protection was added by Ruud Koot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA), I just added upload protection to the mix years later. The request here seems sane to me, FWIW, although I have no idea where the assertion of inactivity might have come from. Anomie 02:02, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The edit protection is probably superfluous now. I wouldn't see any harm in removing it. —Ruud 02:57, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done, the page is no longer edit-protected. Move and upload protection remain in effect. Anomie 13:31, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, @Anomie:. The inactivity statement was about the first protecting admin in the protection log.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 13:33, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 02:18, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done NeilN talk to me 13:39, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Numerous unsourced changes. To be specific, IP-users have persistently added things like runtime and cast members without sources.Crboyer (talk) 04:07, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:17, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopper adding incorrect links repeatedly. . The Banner talk 08:12, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 13:08, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – I think a week will be enough to spoil the fun to vandalise this article. It looks like a concerted effort of several people. The Banner talk 11:24, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 13:03, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: I would like to request a protection in order prevent the vandalism of the anon IPs from editing this article in such an abusive manner especially during the Philippine Independence and any historical events that involve his presence. In the history page you can see others especially the anon IPs are editing such uneducated manner. FilBox101(talk) 02:50, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 07:35, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Target of sock of blocked editor User:Who R U?. Also personal attacks of other editors being made via edit summaries. Ebyabe talk - Health and Welfare08:31, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Another sock just popped up. Regards,   Aloha27  talk  10:52, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 11:04, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion. Again.   Aloha27  talk  09:59, 12 June 2016 (UTC)  Done- Thank you.[reply]

Semi-protected by Materialscientist for one month (for the bot). tutterMouse (talk) 11:00, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion. Again.   Aloha27  talk  10:00, 12 June 2016 (UTC)  Done- Thank you.[reply]

Semi-protected by Materialscientist for one month (for the bot). tutterMouse (talk) 11:01, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – While Dan56 and GentleCollapse16 have a pissing match over whose version of the article is better, please protect the article from their incessant edit-warring. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 05:49, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. It was getting pretty hot and heavy there for a while, but seems to have subsided since Drmies cautioned them on the talk page. MelanieN (talk) 19:52, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Haha, thanks Malik Shabazz and MelanieN; I'm not going to take credit for anything. I just hope common sense prevails. Malik, happy travels. Drmies (talk) 21:13, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please keep anon IPs from editing this article forever...every time protection goes off, they're back. Pending changes doesn't help enough. Montanabw(talk) 05:44, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 06:00, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See edits history. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 06:02, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 06:10, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 06:03, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 06:09, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. clpo13(talk) 17:06, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. The revert warring is recent and fairly minor, and there have been some attempts to discuss the issues at the talk page. I hate to install full protection because it would mess up the indefinite semi-protection. Let's see if the combatants can take it to the talk page. If they don't, re-request protection. MelanieN (talk) 20:12, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopping to continue disruption. LG-Gunther :  Talk  23:03, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 00:35, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. TJH2018talk 00:33, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 00:37, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – While Dan56 and GentleCollapse16 have a pissing match over whose version of the article is better, please protect the article from their incessant edit-warring. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 05:47, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. If this is an edit war, it if a very slow-motion one. Advise the combatants to use the talk page, where their differences do not appear to have been discussed yet. MelanieN (talk) 19:47, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: The same person keeps removing the image that I added; also, the same person inserted the templates that I removed for space and because their own images were deleted per FFD. George Ho (talk) 05:56, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 19:54, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. clpo13(talk) 22:33, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:38, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SabreBD (talk) 22:40, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 1 year. NeilN talk to me 22:47, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by Who R U? (talk · contribs). clpo13(talk) 20:33, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:14, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion of Who R U? (talk · contribs). clpo13(talk) 20:50, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Drmies (talk) 21:18, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Don't know if it's early for this, but this article has been recreated twice since an AfD indicated that this YouTuber is not notable per WP:BLP1E. I do not see him ever becoming notable beyond the news stories of his untimely death in October 2015 at age 13. Please salt, as this article is likely to continue being re-created by fans of this YouTuber or his family. MPFitz1968 (talk) 21:17, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 22:19, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism/editing tests. Calidum ¤ 22:22, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 22:28, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

13 June 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:23, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Widr (talk) 19:15, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I think what needs protection is Leigh_Daniel_Avidan, which was a redirect originally, then got some content, but was non-notable. Now it seems to duplicate Dan Avidan. Changing Leigh Daniel Avidan back to a redirect brought out several people who keep trying to add small amounts of content. Prof. Mc (talk) 19:51, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:58, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Anthonymous 19:38, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Support Page should be a redirect. IP folks are merely adding a line or two of content. Prof. Mc (talk) 19:58, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:59, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Majora (talk) 20:29, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 20:33, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism caused by anonymous users{disrupting and changing of content}. PageImprover (talk) 11:24, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. PageImprover, please read WP:NOTVAND NeilN talk to me 13:20, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Lots of edit warring, sock puppetry, and POV edits that might be from interested parties. IP addresses are involved in most of it. Semi-protection should make things settle down. 170.178.162.125 (talk) 12:06, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 13:18, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. User with same IP address continues to edit the page after previous page protection, and edit warring, in accurate information107.107.62.208 (talk) 13:07, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 13:25, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistant removal of referenced edits relating to controversy or party links to anti-vax organsiations , performed by a user or users associated with this political partyBenvenuto (talk) 05:35, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The main problematic editor is autoconfirmed, and s/he seems to be slowly getting with the program. Rami R 11:46, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism has resumed after unprotection. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 16:27, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:39, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced contents by owner/manager of <http://divyabhartiportal.com>. They earlier used Divyabhartiportal account, now dynamic IP addresses. Anup [Talk] 16:32, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As some reverted edits appeared to be good-faith, including innocuous copyedits, and violation of WP:BLP may be contentious, I can't classify this as exempt from WP:3RR, and must therefore treat it as a straight content dispute. Please discuss matters on the talk page. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:44, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection (three) weeks): Persistent multiple IP edits citing Wounded Knee as the worst mass shooting in American history, probably as a result of the shooting in Orlando (Seen on the pages of Facebook). Needs some time to cool off.--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 13:08, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Since the activity has only started up today, 3 weeks is overkill. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:12, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Spam page created three times in 3 weeks. OnionRing (talk) 13:50, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 13:53, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Fumbling attempts at a vanity page, created 3 times in a week. OnionRing (talk) 14:00, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected - 3 strikes and you're out. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:10, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism with the tired joke that he was playing for the opposition in a game in which he performed badly. '''tAD''' (talk) 14:32, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:35, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:57, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 15:01, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Content dispute and persistent edit-warring by IPs. Ghmyrtle (talk) 07:40, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Rami R 12:04, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Over 70,000 transclusions and the protection should match Template:DPP. ~ RobTalk 08:20, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 13:10, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Over 70,000 transclusions. ~ RobTalk 08:21, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 13:10, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent repeated slurs added by various IPs and new accounts. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 12:08, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 1 year. NeilN talk to me 13:17, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: This has been protected long enough. No vandalism lately. No conflicts. All is well... I hope. George Ho (talk) 12:09, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Ease into unprotection via 1 month pending changes NeilN talk to me 13:05, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism by complete change of track list information (2)

A repeat of my request from a week ago. Looks like after the block was lifted, the same activity resumed...

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 05:04, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 05:04, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 05:04, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 05:04, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 05:04, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 05:04, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Articles revandalized by 2601:241:8304:AAC0:4EF:8203:5E67:B7BF at 22:10, 4 June 2016 all over again.

And so it continues... Willondon (talk) 04:56, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Requesting immediate archiving... NeilN talk to me 13:21, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistant vandalism through added quotations from Hamilton the Musical. --Courfeyracs (talk) 05:27, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:50, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Lots of IP vandalism since this article was created yesterday. Mudwater (Talk) 09:40, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:48, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been getting hit hard today for some reason. Toddst1 (talk) 22:18, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Toddst1, it's the TFA. Disruption isn't too bad considering, but leave this here so admins can monitor. NeilN talk to me 22:47, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Off the Main Page now NeilN talk to me 04:12, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 04:27, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Borikén (talk ·ctb) 00:59, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 04:26, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: One vandalism per day on average in the past week. FoxSerfaty (talk) 03:21, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 04:25, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism from multiple users. Edit war'ing. I propose that the page be protected for a day or tow for things to 'blow over'. Rhumidian (talk) 00:30, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Rhumidian please read WP:NOTVAND NeilN talk to me 01:18, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —MRD2014 T C 01:20, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 01:29, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – CC5K is getting annoying with this... ping Zzuuzz since they last blocked recent sock. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 06:43, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 06:45, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

temporary protection: - IP vandalism as expected for a noted hockey player after his death.--BabbaQ (talk) 07:37, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slon02 (talk) 04:21, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther :  Talk  22:18, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slon02 (talk) 04:24, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism Fbdave (talk) 23:11, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator NeilN. Slon02 (talk) 04:25, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Intense vandalisms in the past three days. FoxSerfaty (talk) 03:21, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 04:26, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Kpop fans are reacting to a story in the gossip blog Allkpop to the group's disbandment. These are unsubstantiated rumours. The article keeps being changed at the moment as the large fan base is hearing about it.. BashBrannigan (talk) 04:09, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12hr, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is not the proper place to request protection, but the article in question needed protection so a 12hr semi has been applied. In the future, please make sure to request protection in the proper section. Thanks, Nakon 04:21, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 23:51, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – When a team wins, there's gotta be a loser, and the Sharks are the loser in this one.

And as expected of pretty much every sports vandalism, the IPs and vandals have come out to make fun of it all. Zappa24Mati 03:15, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 04:08, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Various vandalisms in the past week. FoxSerfaty (talk) 03:21, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 04:09, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent block evasion, almost as soon as its protection expired, the sockpuppetry resumed. Sro23 (talk) 03:37, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 04:06, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP being abused by self-promoting IP

An IP editor who appears to be an actor has been spamming several articles with their name. I've asked at AIV for the IP to be blocked but would you please consider putting say 2 week semi-protection on the following?

- thanks. Jytdog (talk) 02:10, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Jytdog, the last problematic edits were done a few days ago and the IP has been blocked for 3 months. I've put a couple articles on my watchlist - if they hop, let me know and we'll see what we can do. NeilN talk to me 21:59, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, that is an understandable response. Thanks too for putting them on your watchlist. Jytdog (talk) 22:00, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Recent spat of edits by ips that violate blp. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 05:59, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Looks like one editor with a dynamic IP making two edits. If it continues, please re-report. NeilN talk to me 21:48, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP vandalism and disruptive edits (half-complete statistic updates). '''tAD''' (talk) 20:43, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question: '''tAD''', match has ended. Is there still a reason to protect? NeilN talk to me 21:43, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
NeilN We can knock this on the head now. There was some vandalism and insults among the live updates, but due to Mustafi's comparatively low name recognition I doubt it will continue over the night. '''tAD''' (talk) 21:47, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Re-report if disruption continues. One more month of this... NeilN talk to me 21:52, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Long-term vandalism, disrupting editing, and BLP violations. Page logs show multiple temporary page protections. I think having PC protection will greatly reduce the disrupting editing. . -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:37, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I looked through the IP contribs - lots of vandalism and BLP vios and precious little useful edits. Semi will save patrollers a lot of effort. NeilN talk to me 01:59, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.The content written differs from the qouted sources Contentwriter786 (talk) 01:58, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 1 year NeilN talk to me 02:03, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People keep changing his birthdate against consensus on talk. Everymorning (talk) 18:31, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 01:14, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 19:27, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 01:15, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 00:57, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:32, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Last semi-protected for a year due to BLP violations, mostly relating to date of birth. And still it goes on. Sitush (talk) 20:45, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Katietalk 21:18, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See User:EvergreenFir/sandbox#Nick_Jr.2FQubo.2FHIT.2FDiscovery_Kids_vandal_.28Puerto_Rico.29. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 22:41, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:50, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Socking. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Editor2626744. Page is about a book written by Deep Patel (or Deep K. Patel). The sockfarm has moved on to the book now that the author's articles have been creation-protected. Grayfell (talk) 23:01, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 23:06, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

14 June 2016

Temporary semi-protection: The last productive edit by an IP of this page was on April 16. Between that typo correction and now, 13 different IPs have vandalized the page and been reverted. Krelnik (talk) 18:55, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Duly noted that there is a lengthy history of reverted IP edits going back to December 2015.— Maile (talk) 21:29, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Regularly disrupted article. Receiving a fair amount of IP vandalism today. Kosack (talk) 20:40, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 20:44, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Consistent vandalism and disruptive editing by IPs that has gone on for years due to article's touchy subject, and which has increased in frequency the last few days. At some point it seems to have had more attention from vandals than normal editors. Hopefully temporary protection can help us maintain the article's accuracy for some time. Bataaf van Oranje (Prinsgezinde) (talk) 20:43, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's see if pending changes is enough. Lectonar (talk) 20:46, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 12:52, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 16:16, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 14:51, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 20:29, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism '''tAD''' (talk) 15:21, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 20:29, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of speculative anonymous vandalism. Sceptre (talk) 15:57, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 20:30, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of vandalism by IPs and newly-registered users. The page has seen a huge number of reverts in the last couple of days, mostly from fans. At least one of the reverts was accompanied by a threat in the edit-summary. I am not sure how long the semi-protection should last, since the club has some legal issues which might last for some time. All should be resolved no later than August, but it is hard to tell when exactly. Laveol T 16:08, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Can be prolonged if it persists. Lectonar (talk) 20:33, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editors adding a rumoured transfer. Kante4 (talk) 16:41, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 20:34, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Trut-h-urts man (TC) 18:06, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 20:41, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Can the semi-protection currently enacted on the main article page be extended to the talk page please. The article has been subjected to ongoing vandalism for three years (see [29] for a full outline of the case). After being semi-protected the disruption has now spread to the talk page. Betty Logan (talk) 18:53, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 19:07, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TwoTwoHello (talk) 15:24, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by DragonflySixtyseven for 10 days. tutterMouse (talk) 16:45, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP user vandalism.   Aloha27  talk  17:55, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 18:08, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TJH2018talk 18:20, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 18:24, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Continuing POV-pushing sockpuppetry by IPs of banned user User:Filipz123. There is no activity on these articles other than IPs of this user and many of these pages are repeatedly protected because of their activity; please consider a long protection term. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 12:25, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 16:12, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 12:35, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 16:23, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A group of IP address keeps adding the same disruptive content over several weeks. Kylo, Rey, & Finn Consortium (talk) 13:44, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 16:18, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism – Several IP address keeps adding the same disruptive content for some time now, and repeatedly revert attempts to bring the article back to the stable version. Sundostund (talk) 14:43, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 16:20, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:38, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Seems to have stopped; if it picks up, please relist. I left a message on Informant16s talk page Lectonar (talk) 09:19, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Continuing POV-pushing sockpuppetry by IPs of banned user User:Filipz123. There is no activity on these articles other than IPs of this user and many of these pages are repeatedly protected because of their activity; please consider a long protection term. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 12:25, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This page has only been protected once, recently, for a few days. Vandalism resumed almost immediately when the protection expired so I'm giving it two months. The history and the protection log are not sufficient at this time for long term semi-protection. MelanieN (talk) 16:07, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Continuing POV-pushing sockpuppetry by IPs of banned user User:Filipz123. There is no activity on these articles other than IPs of this user and many of these pages are repeatedly protected because of their activity; please consider a long protection term. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 12:25, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vandalism on this page is very recent and this is the first time it has been protected. MelanieN (talk) 16:09, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Continuing POV-pushing sockpuppetry by IPs of banned user User:Filipz123. There is no activity on these articles other than IPs of this user and many of these pages are repeatedly protected because of their activity; please consider a long protection term. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 12:25, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 16:11, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated addition of poorly-sourced, WP:BLP-violating gossip (unverified tabloid rumors about a break-up) into a biography. GermanJoe (talk) 12:39, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week., after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:15, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: - less than 24 hours after the previous semi-protection ended yesterday, an IP goes back and adds the same content that got the page semi-protected for a month previously. Katniss 15:52, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:02, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LG-Gunther :  Talk  21:38, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:06, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Continuing POV-pushing sockpuppetry by IPs of banned user User:Filipz123. There is no activity on these articles other than IPs of this user and many of these pages are repeatedly protected because of their activity; please consider a long protection term. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 12:25, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 12:45, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Continuing POV-pushing sockpuppetry by IPs of banned user User:Filipz123. There is no activity on these articles other than IPs of this user and many of these pages are repeatedly protected because of their activity; please consider a long protection term. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 12:26, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 12:44, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive edits based on rumours. Qed237 (talk) 12:54, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days., after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:09, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Mdann52 (talk) 19:25, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. After watching this for some time, I think there needs to be a timeout. Consensus should be formed on the talkpage. Lectonar (talk) 11:30, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism by multiple IPs Jim1138 (talk) 09:28, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:38, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 11:31, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Rami R 11:59, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism started once again after the protection ended. Long lasting protection needed. Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 17:53, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only one incident of vandalism and it's been almost a week since protection expired. Let's wait a little bit more.--Slon02 (talk) 05:16, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Multiple IPs adding unsourced content, or content cited to sources that do not support the figures being added, such as this. AussieLegend () 20:31, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:05, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. LG-Gunther :  Talk  22:39, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Slon02 (talk) 05:19, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Today's google doodle. High level of IP vandalism. Immediate response would be appreciated. Thanks. Chanaka L (talk) 08:17, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 09:07, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. WaggersTALK 09:07, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated insertion by anons of numerous alleged clan names in defiance of WP:V and WP:NLIST. Even when they appear to be a blue link, the linked article has nothing to do with the alleged clan. Gone on for months, if not years. Sitush (talk) 18:04, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:02, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, which started within 6 hours of the last protection being lifted. Elisfkc (talk) 05:21, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 06:04, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP from Singapore is getting annoying... see edit history. Requesting a couple days semi. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 05:57, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 06:00, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 06:28, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:01, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Several (repeat) incidents of vandalism related to current events in Orlando, may be worth semi-protecting to prevent further vandalism. Vaexa (talk) 13:00, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slon02 (talk) 05:15, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism; second request, please think about longer protection. Thank you very much in advance. Gerry1214 (talk) 19:35, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slon02 (talk) 05:18, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Tired of beating back the vandals, the haters starting to come out now... Shearonink (talk) 00:10, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:57, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

NeilN's protections were lost in recent page moves. Re-requesting segno protection. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 02:57, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done NeilN talk to me 03:50, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 19:58, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:14, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Edit warring and persistent addition of poorly sourced content, all from a Facebook group that also happens to be "referenced" in said poorly sourced content. Booyahhayoob (talk) 23:13, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 02:12, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 01:43, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:58, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – 64000+ transclusions, implements {{Reply to}}. — Andy W. (talk ·ctb) 18:01, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 22:06, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent unconstructive editing by anon editors for last two days. SMS Talk 21:36, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 21:52, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:46, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:03, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection - In the five days since this wrestler made his debut under a new ring name he's already been moved to Andrade "Cien" Almas twice, contrary to WP:COMMONNAME. He has spent 10 years wrestling in Mexico and Japan as "La Sombra" and 10 minutes wrestling under the new name. Will he with time be more known under his new name? Possibly, but that's Crystal balling. It's a GA article and I would hate to lose that status due to a contend dispute from those that think it should be "current name" not "common name".  MPJ-US  21:49, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected indefinitely. Any move of a GA that is remotely contentious should follow the requested move procedure. NeilN talk to me 22:00, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

15 June 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Anonymous editor using "criticism" area for content of disputable accuracy. Have created new sub-heading area for disputed content and added disputed flag. Archivist1642 16:00, 15 June 2016 (UTC)archivist1642

Declined Bit of a pot-pourri, this one. This is obvious vandalism, but other IP edits are good faith. I would wait another day or two and see if things improve, and if not, let me know and I'll see what action can be taken then. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:09, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: After semi-protection expired, an IP already started vandalizing. Get this page semi-protection again please. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 17:43, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The article has required almost continuous protection for months. However, I'm afraid semi-protection will not totally solve the problem, as many of the problematic edits are coming from auto-confirmed users. MelanieN (talk) 20:14, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Surwane1 is at it again using a new IP to promote his website. Dhrm77 (talk) 18:07, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Another page which has required almost continuous protection for the past several months. MelanieN (talk) 20:19, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term anon vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:34, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The article has needed almost continuous semi-protection for most of the past year. MelanieN (talk) 20:26, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent reversions of entry, despite the amount of references supplied, RE status as township. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RepublicaNegrense (talkcontribs) 10:03, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. If you can't agree on what to do on the talk page, then I would recommend getting a third opinion as a first step. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:58, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion. IP sock of blocked User:Who R U?.   Aloha27  talk  18:20, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Favonian. Widr (talk) 18:38, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 18:25, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Favonian. Widr (talk) 18:38, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term vandalism by IPs according to page logs. -- LuK3 (Talk) 15:06, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - extension of previous protection. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:16, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 16:40, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of another month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 17:46, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. INVISIBLEknock! 17:45, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 17:47, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Sock of User:Who R U? began vandalizing shortly after expiration of original semi-protection. Ebyabe talk - Health and Welfare10:42, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nice job, liar ebyabe. Just because what someone writes is from whom you think to be a sock--or even if that account or address is a sock--doesn't automatically mean it's vandalism. 2600:100E:B146:8523:4A6A:44A9:E7CB:3AC5 (talk) 10:58, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:36, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hahaha, ebyabe! In fact, from my end there was NO disruptive activity! Thanks, Lect. 2600:100E:B146:8523:4A6A:44A9:E7CB:3AC5 (talk) 11:44, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Actually that is not what I said...it is just not enough disruption to warrant protection. AIV and other venues are open, of course, as are SPIs. Lectonar (talk) 11:50, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm aware that that's not what you said, Lec. But the fact is that there was no disruption, because setting something to MoS isn't disruptive, since the MoS is the only consensus needed. 2600:100E:B146:8523:4A6A:44A9:E7CB:3AC5 (talk) 11:54, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, removal of sourced content. 2601:188:1:AEA0:4DE2:BECD:8051:3C87 (talk) 12:46, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:23, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and BLP violations by IP hopping vandal. Sro23 (talk) 14:11, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:55, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – vanity page for User:MuhammadAliChudry, with no useful target for redirect. OnionRing (talk) 14:47, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:58, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing - has previously had two, one month long, semi-protections but Sicilian IP with fixation for Nikka Costa, Don Costa and Canadian-American Records has returned again - Arjayay (talk) 07:33, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. For now this is just one IP. Lectonar (talk) 07:37, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protecion: persistent vandalism about an alleged Finnish apartheid. --Vituzzu (talk) 07:42, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:42, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – moderate level of vandalism. -- haminoon (talk) 08:06, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:13, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs keep reverting edits on template to an incorrect state, been going on for a few weeks. VEOonefive 14:48, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. It is always the same IP...whose talk-page is red. Have you tried to communicate? Lectonar (talk) 07:15, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. --Kansas Bear (talk) 00:58, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 07:23, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection This is a high-traffic article, linked as the main news item on the main page, and not too surprisingly IPs are adding unsourced and / or contentious content, or removing reliably sourced content they don't like. I'd protect myself but I'm kind of WP:INVOLVED as I wrote the majority of the article as it currently stands. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 08:56, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:36, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, presumably from one user in a narrow IP range. 2601:188:1:AEA0:F9CF:CD1C:4CEC:AC6F (talk) 02:33, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:09, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some apparently-related IPs/possible meatpuppets have been persistently adding factual errors to articles about members of the Washington family. Today their targets have included Martha Washington, John Washington, & Augustine Washington - their favorite targets have been adding errors about the manner of death. Please protect these articles for some temporary period of time - tired of hacking away at their vandalism. Shearonink (talk) 02:47, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not enough vandalism for semiprotection. Lectonar (talk) 08:11, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some apparently-related IPs/possible meatpuppets have been persistently adding factual errors to articles about members of the Washington family. Today their targets have included Martha Washington, John Washington, & Augustine Washington - their favorite targets have been adding errors about the manner of death (for instance, changing the death parameter from empty to "suicide" or "Fever"). Please protect these articles for some temporary period of time - tired of hacking away at their vandalism. Shearonink (talk) 02:48, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not enough vandalism for semiprotection. Lectonar (talk) 08:11, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some apparently-related IPs that all geolocate to LA have been persistently adding factual errors to articles about members of the Washington family. Today their targets have included Martha Washington, John Washington, & Augustine Washington - their favorite targets have been adding errors about the manner of death (for instance, changing death parameter from empty to "suicide" or "Fever"). Please protect these articles for some temporary period of time - tired of hacking away at this persistent vandalism. Shearonink (talk) 02:51, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not enough vandalism for semiprotection. Lectonar (talk) 08:11, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Several POV users continually edit warring against previous consensus without discussion. Already semi-protected. BilCat (talk) 05:09, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., usual Russian vs Ukrainian rant involving a new pro-Ukrainian user.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:53, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection: IP editor adding and re-adding unsourced content to article about opioid drug. Jytdog (talk) 06:01, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:12, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs continue to vandalise page after CBS released its cast members a few hours ago. – jona 23:13, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:43, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated namecrufting from various ip addresses. John from Idegon (talk) 01:08, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:24, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sock puppetry. IP hopping by User:Fangusu. Antique RoseDrop me a line 02:20, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:45, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Editors are attempting to apply transfers that do not take effect until 1 July to this and other association football articles. Request protection until 01:00 1 July 2016 for new and anon editors. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:08, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 16 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. You never know in which part of the world the fanboys hide...Lectonar (talk) 07:44, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – There seems to be some move warring today by Funcrunch and Fitindia. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 16:50, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is settled now. Fitindia was acting in good faith I presume, not realizing the subject does not capitalize her first or last name. Funcrunch (talk) 16:53, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Per above MusikAnimal talk 23:12, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by non-extended confirmed users. Parsley Man (talk) 22:08, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The protection only encompasses non-autoconfirmed users. It appears some autoconfirmed users are also vandalizing the article. Parsley Man (talk) 22:14, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. MusikAnimal talk 23:07, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 2602:306:3357:BA0:4021:617C:E657:19B8 (talk) 01:42, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Monty845 02:12, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes or temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, given that the game just had its name revealed. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 16:23, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I see frantic editing, but no real vandalism. Some cluelessness, some overeagerness. This seems well under control and will die down shortly. Lectonar (talk) 20:36, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Persistent vandalism, mostly by IPs, going back more than a month. Chickadee46 (talk|contribs) 18:46, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not high level, even below the threshold for pending-changes protection. Lectonar (talk) 20:42, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indef Semi-protection: Long-term disruption. Many IPs disputed that article should been a redirect or CSD tagging that has no context. KGirlTrucker81 talk what I'm been doing 19:48, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 20:47, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism is continuing after last protection was lifted. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:13, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Malcolmxl5. MusikAnimal talk 23:13, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Professor Van Leer's wiki page has been falsely edited persistently by several different IP addresses. For example, false life events were added and copyrighted pictures from Professor Van Leer were used without consent. The semi-protection will help make sure his wiki page content stays true and will make sure it complies with Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Dkaihua (talk) 19:00, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Dkaihua: No, we had that before. Read your talk-page. Lectonar (talk) 19:06, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There appears to have been a great deal of vandalism by IPs and new accounts on this article today. RolandR (talk) 21:12, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 23:05, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism continued immediately after semi expired. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 21:22, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 23:04, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Slow but consistent Donald Trump related vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 21:23, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 23:04, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 22:07, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 23:06, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. RolandR (talk) 22:39, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 23:09, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent wave of IP vandalism. Requesting indefinite or longterm protection given the extensive history of protection this page has seen [30]. Calidum ¤ 22:43, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 23:11, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

16 June 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent spate from unregistered/unconfirmed/IP accounts. At least pending changes but really - anything would be a help. Vandals are at it again today. Shearonink (talk) 17:13, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:10, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 2602:306:3357:BA0:BDE3:83A5:201D:4B1F (talk) 18:05, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:19, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There's currently a content dispute about whether to include the Rockefeller-Rothschild relationship in the other families parameter of the infobox. I think we need a complete halt on editing for a moment to work things out. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 18:48, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:05, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP users changing this actress' birth year without citation of a reliable source, with these edits occurring on and just after the actress' birthday. MPFitz1968 (talk) 22:37, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 12:17, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Katniss 01:58, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. This is essentially IP 24.xxx Lectonar (talk) 12:18, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Subject of article is involved in a current event (she is a politician who was shot/stabbed). Requesting temporary pp because of incorrect/unsourced information being added by ips and new users. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 13:50, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I see relatively few edits like that by IPs or new user; people are just frantic. The article is well watched because of the actual event, and very much under control. Relist if it picks up please. Lectonar (talk) 14:31, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Lectonar IP vandalism has increased in last 30ish minutes, can we have semi-protection? Joseph2302 (talk) 16:00, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done See report below. NeilN talk to me 16:07, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Shanta Ronaldo abuse/hoaxing has resumed again recently. McGeddon (talk) 15:53, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:09, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. General Ization Talk 21:13, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done I blocked one sock. Please re-report if others show up. NeilN talk to me 11:53, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent and unexplained page blanking. 2601:188:1:AEA0:4DE2:BECD:8051:3C87 (talk) 06:11, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Page deleted. NeilN talk to me 11:57, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some ips are changing the name to Snowy Thompson repeatedly. . Mar11 (talk) 08:05, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. NeilN talk to me 12:01, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same type of "meme" vandalism that led to prior semi-protection. Deli nk (talk) 15:09, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:23, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism on this high-traffic BLP with edits stating wrongly that she is dead and the removal of paragraphs of text. Firebrace (talk) 15:58, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enough disruption on a high profile BLP NeilN talk to me 16:06, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EauZenCashHaveIt (I'm All Ears) 08:29, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2600:1001:b128:8a2c:74d8:5cb1:2e66:afb9 (talk · contribs) blocked by NeilN . Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:20, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Constant unexplained removal of content and section blanking by IPs. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 12:33, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:46, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Longterm abuse by addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. livelikemusic talk! 14:27, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:32, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Long term semi-protection Persistent re-writing by opponents aiming to discredit Philip Trueman (talk) 03:12, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:17, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – A bill to change the lyrics has passed the first house in Canada, but are not officially changed. Not all editors understand this and so protection for a few days would be appreciated. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:56, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 11:56, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A controversial film. We should anticipate heavy vandalism since it is scheduled to release 17 June 2016. Nairspecht Converse 07:00, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:19, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: due to large scale vandalism from multiple IP adresses, including one registered user. Vandalism is happening faster than what can be reverted, and I'm not sure of any clean version to revert to anymore. Assistance is needed. -- Altaïr Ibn-La'Ahad 07:46, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. NeilN talk to me 12:01, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring by IPs and newbies. Jim1138 (talk) 09:11, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:16, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – A number of editors are adding the Omar Mateen to this article thinking they saw him in the movie. No evidence. Toddst1 (talk) 20:28, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Now sourced. NeilN talk to me 00:44, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP Vandal continues to add unsourced info. Digifan23 (talk) 01:06, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 01:20, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of IP edits from India, believed to be from people involved in such activities. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 01:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 03:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: due to recent malicious vandalism. Bobsanders1991 (talk) 03:19, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 03:26, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent, chronic block evasion (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Atomic_Meltdown). Repeated temporary protection has been ineffective. Jason A. Quest (talk) 18:28, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. In fact there have been no edits, vandalism or otherwise, since the latest protection expired on June 1. MelanieN (talk) 20:21, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There will be. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 21:16, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This is a new subtemplate for {{RMassist}}, which is part of the main process at WP:RM/TR. {{RMassist}} is already semi-protected, and since this template now contains the core functionality, should have at least a matching prot level. — Andy W. (talk ·ctb) 19:46, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For more context, see Special:Diff/725484943 if it helps. New requests at WP:RM/TR have also been running smoothly as always. Thanks! — Andy W. (talk ·ctb) 01:11, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. Biblio (talk) 01:15, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Amortias (T)(C) 21:43, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. I believe this was lost when the recent full protection expired. NeilN talk to me 00:50, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term anon vandalism the past week. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:57, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 1 year. NeilN talk to me 00:41, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Content dispute regarding the dates surrounding her being shot and killed - IP and newly registered users are going against what the references cited in the article say concerning those two parts, which happened on two consecutive dates, not one. MPFitz1968 (talk) 22:17, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:38, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Per user request . Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 23:14, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(non-admin closure) DeltaQuad completed request. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 23:20, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. NeilN talk to me 00:32, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 23:15, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:34, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – 95.93.220.31 (talk · contribs) continues adding unsourced content to the article in an apparent attempt of WP:ADVOCACY. See Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#Jo.C3.A3o Vale e Azevedo. SLBedit (talk) 16:19, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Exactly; it's this one IP. Lectonar (talk) 17:45, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I did but IP ignores the warnings. SLBedit (talk) 19:43, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A long term disruptive IP-hopping editor, referred to as "Macy VG IP vandal" (see User:Salvidrim!/Macy VG IP vandal for some history), has necessitated repeated protection of Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade and is now repeatedly disrupting the talk page. Deli nk (talk) 17:01, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Talk pages are seldom protected, as it makes impossible to people to request edits. If the talk page comments are useless, ignore them. If they are offensive or otherwise incivil, or spammed in bulk, raise a complaint on WP:ANI (or WP:AIV if straight vandalism) and an admin can look at a block. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:21, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Heavy IP vandalism, according to page edit history. -- LuK3 (Talk) 19:17, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Keith D.. MelanieN (talk) 21:30, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

17 June 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 19:49, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., we are safe now even if Spain makes it to the final.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:05, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: IPs resumed adding false information as soon as last protection ended. Meters (talk) 19:58, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 21:51, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP vandals continuing to reinsert false or dubious information now that the page is not protected again.--Mr Fink (talk) 20:59, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 21:49, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: User request within own user space. Jetstreamer Talk 21:44, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Widr (talk) 21:46, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP and anon vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 17:55, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 17:57, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. General Ization Talk 17:58, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 18:39, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Lizard (talk) 18:07, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism from multiple IPs Kinetic37 (talk) 18:37, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Penwhale, who protected it two minutes after this request was left; that's why the bot thought that it was already protected. Nyttend (talk) 19:30, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Remove protection from Zootopia. 112.134.80.127 (talk) 12:40, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. And no for the unprotection request. Lectonar (talk) 13:28, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued abuse of editing; addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. livelikemusic talk! 12:50, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Page is starting to see an uptick in IP vandals inserting in "Finding Dory" related nonsense. Will only become more frequent once the movie comes out.--Mr Fink (talk) 16:48, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1209600 seconds, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nyttend (talk) 17:20, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Would be ideal to protect for a day or two as he scored a goal in the Euro 2016 football tournament and is receiving a lot of vandalism. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 15:42, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 17:04, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Rapid multiple socks adding spam: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/New Editor 121. OnionRing (talk) 16:28, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 17:00, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Rapid multiple socks adding spam: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/New Editor 121. OnionRing (talk) 16:30, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 17:00, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Consistent edit-warring by unregistered editor using multiple IP addresses. ElKevbo (talk) 16:38, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 16:59, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Fairly frequent unhelpful, albeit mostly good-faith, edits. SSTflyer 06:39, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I think we can cope with the occasional revert. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:11, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP-hopper repeatedly removing the Scandinavian origin of the Lombards (i.e. the mainstream view), on this and other articles. I'm asking for protection since no-one else seems to care about the article, and I'm at three reverts... Thomas.W talk 13:02, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 15:42, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection of move protection: Talk page RM discussion. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:28, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Katietalk 11:56, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Pending Changes needs to be removed as its semi protected . Flow234 (talk) 09:50, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done When semi-protection expires, pending changes will kick back in as it's configured indefinitely. If you have another reason for unprotection, we're listening. :-) Katietalk 11:54, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Page was just unprotected on June 11, but there's still quite a lot of disruptive editing. ItsIzumi (talk) 06:46, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 11:15, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 2016 NBA Finals Game 6-related trolling. Arbor to SJ (talk) 06:53, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 11:14, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Someone who doesn't understand or doesn't care how referencing works keeps changing the genre, contradicting the cited source. See page history – the last seven IPs over the last two months have all been making the same change. Adrian J. Hunter(talkcontribs) 07:20, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 11:13, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Developing story, plenty of IP editing without source material Mentor397 (talk) 07:40, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by RockMFR for 24 hours. tutterMouse (talk) 11:00, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Previously given a week long semi-protection. Continued vandalism from un-autoconfirmed users adding her birth place as Kosovo instead of the correct FR Yugoslavia. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 11:12, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 11:17, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. TJH2018talk 02:46, 16 June 2016 (UTC) --Carolinaandade (talk) 21:12, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. NeilN talk to me 12:07, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: The previous page protection clearly did not last long enough. Lots of basketball vandalism. Dustin (talk) 23:31, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 06:11, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As expected, vandalism picked back up. Requesting one more week (until the NBA finals are over). Game 7 is on Sunday, so a week would give folks time to cool down regarding the win or loss. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 07:29, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:14, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Precautionary measure, following the death of Jo Cox, Cox's page is currently semi-protected. The Britain First article had 50,000 views yesterday and I've just added some tweaks the section on Cox's death. The Vintage Feminist (talk) 08:19, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected.. The article has pending changes until 6 July, and the article seems to be holding its own against that. Most of the back-and-forth is coming from longstanding editors, so semi-protection wouldn't do anything. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:13, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring IPs over the last week, changing content without sourcing. ☾Loriendrew☽ (ring-ring) 23:39, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 06:08, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content related to a living person: Gabriel Batistuta goals for Argentina. SLBedit (talk) 02:07, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 06:07, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit-warring by sockpuppets and/or meatpuppets of User:Who R U?. Ebyabe talk - Union of Opposites06:31, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 06:38, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I already TOLD you that I edit these like I've seen of the few from who r u. There are only so many ways (1, really) you can COPY the format from MoS to an article. That doesn't make us all socks or steaks. NOT the same as what 2605 does. 2600:100E:B136:F3F2:F196:44F5:8CD1:7874 (talk) 06:41, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is under WP:ARBPIA3#500/30, but gets lots of vandalism by "new" editors and IPs. Huldra (talk) 14:19, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is under WP:ARBPIA3#500/30, but gets lots of vandalism by IPs. Huldra (talk) 14:20, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I know it's unusual to protect a talkpage, but there's been a lot of unhelpful IPs. Some speculations which aren't helpful, and lots of flat out vandalism. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:59, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Not quite there yet NeilN talk to me 23:44, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs and new accounts frequently pepper this article with anti-US paragraphs, which are generally written in a paranoiac and conspiratorial tone and lack basic formatting and grammar. This is also a little-edited article, so such disruptive editing often lasts a long time. I just reverted an egregious example that lasted three weeks. Risc64 (talk) 20:08, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vandalism is infrequent but recurrent; let's see what PC protection can do. MelanieN (talk) 22:57, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Article about a UK Exam Board receiving frequent vandalism currently as it is UK Exam season now. Persistent vandalistic edits from multiple IP and new accounts. Generally creating derogatory edits. tedjam (talk) 20:45, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:43, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent removal of content and other disruptive editing by multiple IPs. RA0808 talkcontribs 21:23, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 23:48, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Amortias (T)(C) 21:38, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider indefinitely protecting this page. On the associated talk page, I have presented what I believe to be very strong evidence of long-term troll and banned user User:Akash3141 returning to make this article a hagiography (he was banned largely for wrecking the associated article, The Undertaker, with similar material). In response, he has accused me of being a UK-based blocked user and persistently removes the evidence I put forth, when I am in fact resident in Belgium. 185.54.163.102 (talk) 22:01, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Huon. NeilN talk to me 23:41, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion from User:Who R U?, the day after it became unprotected the evasion started again. Sro23 (talk) 22:20, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 23:43, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Block evasion from User:Who R U?, protection recently expired. Sro23 (talk) 22:22, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 23:41, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 18:14, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:38, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unsourced changes. Jetstreamer Talk 18:57, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:40, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: edit-warring. Ymblanter (talk) 19:16, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:46, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 19:22, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:48, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption when protection expired. Player will change club on 1 July so suggest protection at least until then. Qed237 (talk) 20:07, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:51, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of non-notable awards. 001Jrm (talk) 06:31, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. NeilN talk to me 12:04, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP vandalism of adding false dates and opening act. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 17:25, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:29, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated IP vandalism/edit warring the introduction of a typo and an inaccuracy (at last Google search Lisa Thiel has not left the program). Launchballer 17:38, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:33, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – The Benfica player has signed a contract with Atlético Madrid, but it only be effective in July. SLBedit (talk) 18:01, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

According to Atlético's official website: "The midfielder is now playing the Copa América with Argentina's national team and will later travel to Madrid next July to finish the necessary formalities to join the red and white team." He didn't join Atlético yet and the contract is effective in July, so he still is a Benfica player. I'm tired of reverting low effort edits. SLBedit (talk) 22:22, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:35, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

18 June 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 30 days should do. Related to 2016 Orlando nightclub shooting. See "contributions": [31] [32] [33] [34] etc. etc. -- dsprc [talk] 18:12, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 18:50, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Wackyike (talk) 19:09, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:12, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Five recent deletions imply that this page should be salted. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 19:40, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected by The Anome for one year. tutterMouse (talk) 20:10, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Edit warring by IP socks of banned user Vote (X) for Change. Mojoworker (talk) 15:45, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bad faith unsubstantiated WP:NPA. 78.145.16.196 (talk) 16:38, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. Widr (talk) 17:30, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent nonconstructive edits from user (or users, unsure) in an IP range since March. FosterHaven (talk) 16:06, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:23, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Content dispute between two IP users. Both have breached WP:3RR. clpo13(talk) 16:10, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:22, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 17:24, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 17:30, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Favre1fan93 (talk) 02:41, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 14:51, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Another target of the stream of User:Who R U? sock/meatpuppets. Ebyabe talk - State of the Union08:34, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 14:49, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Long term or indefinite semi-protection: Immediately after expiraton of Dennis Brown's previous protection: reprise ([35]) by persistent, determined indef blocked Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Asdisis. Page was protected many times before, resulting in same behaviour after exp. Temporary protection does not help. Probably long term is needed for Talk:Nikola Tesla as well. DVdm (talk) 08:37, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 14:48, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content — Persistent vandalism — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haveyouseenthisboy (talkcontribs) 09:19, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 14:47, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Currently semi-protected due to persistent sockpuppetry. The sockmaster has moved on to using sleeper accounts to get around semi-protection and is actively using multiple sleeper accounts across many semi-protected articles to insert false information. Unless an admin feels 30/500 is appropriate (which doesn't have community consensus for use against sockpuppetry yet), full protection is the only thing that will stop the disruption. Since this article is based on 2005, legitimate beneficial edits are rare. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Никита-Родин-2002. ~ RobTalk 00:48, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I'd like to see this continue on for more than two-hour period before concluding full-protection is truly necessary. The sleeper / autoconfirmed dancing is a lot of work for little benefit. I suspect they'll get over it MusikAnimal talk 02:19, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
BU Rob13, what I'm wondering is how Ohlava managed to edit through semi-protection. Autoconfirmed is usually four days and ten edits. SarahSV (talk) 02:20, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@SlimVirgin: The account was created on June 2 and remained as a sleeper until activated earlier today with ten swift edits in the userspace. @MusikAnimal: Please see the archive of the SPI report. This is not the first time this user has used autoconfirmed accounts to edit through semi-protection, unfortunately, and we've been playing whack-a-mole with this incredibly persistent sneaky vandal for months at this point. This master has been using sleepers for months, especially in the past two weeks since long-term semi-protection began being used widely on relevant articles. This one article may have had a two hour rash of vandalism, but this spans dozens of articles, and this master never stops until technically unable to continue. ~ RobTalk 02:26, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Rob, thanks, I went to block the account, but it has just been done by someone else. SarahSV (talk) 02:46, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. That stops it for now at least, but he'll be back within a few days. He hops around IPs on a wide range, so CU isn't even effective at finding sleepers. This is going to wind up at ArbCom in an attempt to get 50/300 authorized for the broad topic area affected by this sockmaster, probably. ~ RobTalk 02:57, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I got the impression that we could use 30/500 if we needed to, but perhaps I misunderstood. I'll have a look around. The alternative is to block the accounts as soon as they appear. SarahSV (talk) 03:30, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Much easier said than done when no admins have these articles in their watchlists. These reports typically sit at AIV for a while as other reports are handled, since admins patrolling AIV don't understand the non-simple vandalism. SPI reports can sit anywhere from an hour to multiple weeks. ~ RobTalk 03:49, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs performing repetitive edits from few days. Vin09(talk) 09:27, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:22, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Transfer rumours. Qed237 (talk) 10:58, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 11:18, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 15:36, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, pending changes are doing just fine. If the user who caused disruption today continues they should be blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:04, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pending changes is actually useless to begin with since it doesn't stop IP's and new users from disrupting articles Snuggums (talk / edits) 01:15, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Currently semi-protected due to persistent sockpuppetry. The sockmaster has moved on to using sleeper accounts to get around semi-protection and is actively using multiple sleeper accounts across many semi-protected articles to insert false information. Unless an admin feels 30/500 is appropriate (which doesn't have community consensus for use against sockpuppetry yet), full protection is the only thing that will stop the disruption. Since this article is based on an older song and is fairly complete, legitimate beneficial edits are rare. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Никита-Родин-2002. ~ RobTalk 01:13, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Responding to the one above first, I do see this article has had several days of disruption. I'd still like to respectfully decline for now, and defer to the experts at WP:SPI. The admins there have the tools and will know more about the extent of disruption and how to best handle it. Full protection is a lot to ask, sorry MusikAnimal talk 02:22, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent edit warring by IP-hopper. Other targeted articles: Persian language and Tajik language. Wario-Man (talk) 04:27, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 05:40, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion from User:Who R U?. Sro23 (talk) 22:20, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 22:24, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP jumping vandal. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:19, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:26, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Ongoing edit war. Could use a brief protection until talk page discussion closes, as IPs continue to make same reversion without discussing. Amccann421 (talk) 00:29, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected..Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:22, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

19 June 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppet IPs trolling the same question. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:10, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:51, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Incredibly long abuse log. Page is seeing a stream of vandalism and POV edits which could be illegal as they could prejudice an ongoing criminal trial. '''tAD''' (talk) 19:27, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 20:54, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long history of being a target of socks. Almost every edit in the past several months has been by socks or reverting socks. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Никита-Родин-2002 and its archives. ~ RobTalk 20:50, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 20:53, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism is flying like mad here, subject just died. Addisnog (talk) 18:59, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:06, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CAPTAIN RAJU () 19:46, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Widr (talk) 19:51, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CAPTAIN RAJU () 19:47, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:50, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully-protection: Edit warring and POV pushing HemaChandra88 (talk) 06:33, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Misplaced. The requester is POV-pushing. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 09:08, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined for now - although it's on the line between content dispute and disruption. I'll look in on the article in a bit and if the reverts have continued, I'll protect it. AlexiusHoratius 11:39, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP(s) keeps on deleting sourced material. Some IP(s) are also vandalising this page. Spartacus! (talk) 11:48, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Although the IP's motive was different, it was removing copyvio text. Re-removed with warning left for Spartacus. Nyttend (talk) 11:56, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. clpo13(talk) 17:02, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:21, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and disruptive ending by a couple of IPs. They revert updates and keep posting a version preferred to them in a disruptive manner. Thanks. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 03:26, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 11:41, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As soon as protection went off, the vandalism started again, probably better slap it on for a year or so now... sigh. Montanabw(talk) 06:50, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 11:36, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring by IPs Jim1138 (talk) 06:58, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 11:34, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A sudden burst of Google Doodle related vandalism, coupled with increased vandalism in the last couple of days preceding the holiday. Safiel (talk) 04:08, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 11:26, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: User:Who R U? sock edits resumed after block expired. Ebyabe talk - Border Town05:08, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 11:28, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: IP vandals abusing a redirect named after a living person. There is no need ever for the page to be edited, unless the subject becomes notable enough for a full article, which shouldn't be written by an IP anyway '''tAD''' (talk) 10:40, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 11:32, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing and unsourced content — vandalism and adding unsourced content to the article. Haveyouseenthisboy (talk) 07:33, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Widr. Nakon 00:17, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 00:05, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 00:17, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The user User talk:144.36.207.230 is still vandalizing the article Arjuna. Even after repeated warnings by Editors, Admin and Bots the User talk:144.36.207.230 does not seems to heed. Due to his continuous vandalizing the article was semi protected earlier last week for some time. Now the protection is removed and he is back again. It should be better to block user User talk:144.36.207.230 permanently from editing and keep this article semi protected always. Arjunkrishna90 (talk) 03:01, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. for two weeks. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:19, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism . Kayser Ahmad (talk) 03:11, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 21:32, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Highlevel of IP vandalism.Beebek 14:46, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 21:36, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full-protection: There is a very slow edit war that has lasted for months. Time to lock the page up and force these two editors to talk more and perhaps ask for outside assistance.-- Moxy (talk) 15:24, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Katietalk 21:35, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent mix of disruption, vandalism, and unsourced content. Amccann421 (talk) 20:10, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. But! Maybe the next admin who has a look at this board feels differently; if so, please act accordingly. Drmies (talk) 21:09, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – constant edit war. Unnecessary addition of "known as" . MrMarmite (talk) 00:18, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 00:22, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

'Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated IP-vandalism on BLP. New protection needed since the previous protection expired today and the IP-vandalism already is in full swing again. Thomas.W talk 22:06, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 00:14, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP and newly registered user vandalism since almost ever edit in the past two weeks has been vandalism.Aspects (talk) 22:10, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 22:45, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – vandalism/removal of content. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 22:25, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 00:15, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent hoaxing. All recent edits for the past few months have been vandalism/reverting vandalism. Sro23 (talk) 22:42, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 00:16, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Teams have started to qualify and editors not knowing rules and/or only being disruptive add teams of their choice. This resumed as soon as last protection expired so I propose protection until tournament is over on 11 July. Qed237 (talk) 23:34, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 00:16, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

20 June 2016

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 21:38, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:26, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP/new account vandalism after NBA Finals. NapoliRoma (talk) 03:12, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. A mix of good faith and vandalism IP edits means this is the best option. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:12, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism Gulumeemee (talk) 03:59, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:14, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. General Ization Talk 04:13, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The socks have less than ten edits, so the semi-protection will stop them. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:18, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP attack on the page adding false certifications. —IB [ Poke ] 11:10, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The previous 1 month semi-protection doesn't seem to have stopped the disruption, so this time it's longer. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:23, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Night after a major title change, so it's to be expected. A week of semi until it styles down should prevent further disruption. oknazevad (talk) 13:27, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm going to be hopeful that they'll get bored by that point and that will be enough. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:20, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I guess a famous viner sent his fans to vandalize the article with his name. Sro23 (talk) 18:18, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:15, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The UPN Vandal is refusing to let up even with pending changes. Looks like semi-protection is the only way to go at this point. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 21:47, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 20:57, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism due to a youtuber using the name as a character in a wwe game playthrough. CaptainPedge | Talk 01:26, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:39, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. General Ization Talk 03:41, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. IP edits are a mixture of good faith and BLP violations. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:01, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalized page - [36] - requesting protection to prevent any further incidents like this. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 13:02, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Absolutely no need for an IP to edit that page Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:09, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 21:37, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:52, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – mostly BLP violations. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 07:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Widr for one month. tutterMouse (talk) 08:10, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – same editor, same reasons. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 07:14, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:51, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Mdrnpndr (talk) 17:47, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vandalism is not frequent, but it keeps recurring. Let's see what PC protection can do. MelanieN (talk) 22:22, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This page is a natural magnet for BLP violations and vandalism due to the subject matter. I just reverted one (by an IP user) that was live for three weeks. I suggest permanent semi-protection for this reason, or at the very least, having more people watch the page. FiredanceThroughTheNight (talk) 17:50, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 20:55, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Contentious issue being added repeatedly to BLP. Editor has refused to engage in discussion despite invitations. Request 2 weeks. Niteshift36 (talk) 21:23, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and warned both users since both are at 3RR. Edit warring is edit warring. And semi-protection would not do any good since both users are auto-confirmed. MelanieN (talk) 03:36, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Page is being attacked by an anonymous, IP-hopping vandal who insists on inserting, reinserting and edit-warring to keep reinserted poorly written, blatantly original research opinions.--Mr Fink (talk) 14:22, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The article has needed almost continuous protection, most recently for 6 months. Vandalism resumed the very day that protection expired. Next time it should probably be indefinite. You can quote me. MelanieN (talk) 22:02, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant addition of unsourced content - see article history. Alex|The|Whovian? 14:48, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:04, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: I don't know why I keep celeb articles on my watchlist. The Redmaynes had a child. Terrific. First, the material was added without sourcing. Now it's at least sourced, but all we have to note is that they had a daughter this year. The DOB should not be included for privacy reasons. Yet, that's what the IPs will continue to add.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:01, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:07, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 2602:306:3357:BA0:5C46:532D:3EF:EDC8 (talk) 16:22, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:10, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Mdrnpndr (talk) 17:46, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:13, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Mdrnpndr (talk) 17:46, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:18, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Content dispute regarding wording of lead. Discussion is ongoing on talk page, but IP editor insists on reverting against consensus. clpo13(talk) 17:52, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bullshit. I'm not the disruptive one here who is blindly reverting. A nickname and stage are not the same thing and the wording I prefer is long standing. 107.77.192.49 (talk) 17:54, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Would you care to discuss on the talk page instead of edit warring? clpo13(talk) 17:56, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. for 3RR violation. Favonian (talk) 18:09, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

21 June 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The same person keeps changing the names or switching them. Unsure whether it was a sockpuppet, but it's been done before. George Ho (talk) 01:22, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. This individual has been meddling with a wide range of articles for the best part of a year using multiple (67!) IPv6 addresses. They have been blocked several times (one IPv6 address is currently blocked). A lengthy timeout to protect the encyclopedia is warranted I think so I have blocked the /64 range for three months. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:29, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The same person keeps changing roles with different IPs. George Ho (talk) 01:23, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. The /64 range has been blocked for three months, see my comment on the request for protection of Cheers. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:32, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. George Ho (talk) 01:23, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. The /64 range has been blocked for three months, see my comment on the request for protection of Cheers. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:32, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism form multiple IPs originating from the Philippines. —Farix (t | c) 14:19, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:16, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Player is rumored to be moving clubs soon and, as a result, is receiving a lot of attention from IP's adding unsourced and incorrect information. Kosack (talk) 17:26, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:03, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing attacks of socks of LTA troll Vgleer. Dr. K. 23:00, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Dr.K.: I will leave it up to you to decide how unconfirmed and IP editors can contact you. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:01, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection:A user keeps changing the format, making it look less like other sidebars about presidential candidates. Since this is an autoconfirmed user making these changes, it looks like full protection (temporary) is the only way to go about this. --Proud User (talk) 22:20, 19 June 2016 (UTC) It turns out that this reversion summary made me think that consistency was being removed when it was really being added.--Proud User (talk) 13:27, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Currently being discussed on talk page. --Jules (Mrjulesd) 23:37, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to point out that Proud User is making a deceptive comment here: He is the one that keeps trying to interfere with the article, and I'm simply trying to put it back to how it was originally. However, he's trying to phrase things to make it look like I'm the one who made the edit. If you check the history of the article, you'll see that I've never made any edits to it at all: I'm simply trying to revert two unjustified edits. Here is a link to the article before Proud User interfered with it:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Bernie_Sanders_series&oldid=722822373

He keeps switching out the picture with no justification, and I keep undoing the edit. He's already past the three-revert-rule.
InternetMeme (talk) 12:33, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The image was like that before you changed it (see here), and I said that there needs to be a consensus before it is changed agian. I see nothing "deceptive" about this. The user that made the above comment is also changing the format without explanation.--Proud User (talk) 12:35, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No, that's a straight up lie: Check the link above. That is the original image, and it's you who changed it. I am simply revertin it to how it was originally. You're trying to make sound like I'm the one changing the image when it's you.
The other edit you seem to be insisting on is removing Sanders's endorsements, on the grounds that it's "consistent". However, I not that you forgot to remove the endorsements from the Hillary Clinton series template.
So, in summary, you want to:
  1. Switch out Sanders's image for a clearly inferior one.
  2. Remove his endorsements.
What is your intention here?
InternetMeme (talk) 12:43, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Well, this edit seems to say that you were removing consistency (and I went along with it, paying less attention to detail than I should have). I agree that this template should mention endorsements, but not in the place you were putting them. This template should be consistent with Template:Hillary Clinton series. My intentions are to keep consistency, although I must say I didn't realize that you were actually adding the "endorsements" link rather than moving them. However this should be discussed on a different page. --Proud User (talk) 12:48, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I think we both misunderstood each other's actions. Sorry about that, I'm sure we can sort this easily out once these Wikiproject Photography guys give us some advice. InternetMeme (talk) 21:03, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not done It looks as though there has been a misunderstanding. If you guys can resolve this on the talk page, so much the better. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:03, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content is scientifically specific, requests to add content of value may be added to talk page. Post81DOT61fahr (talk) 05:52, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recreation of a deleted page by a sock of a blocked editor. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Freecomwireless. Meters (talk) 18:53, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not done The page has been deleted. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:28, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 15:35, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The IP vandal was blocked for 31 hours by Gilliam. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:42, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism attempt from User: Saatvik.Jacob_Material_Scientist on 20th June, 2016. See

(cur | prev) 20:51, June 20, 2016‎ RA0808 (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (779 bytes) (-155)‎ . . (Reverted edits by Saatvik.Jacob_Material_Scientist (talk) (HG) (3.1.20)) (undo | thank)

(cur | prev) 20:51, June 20, 2016‎ Saatvik.Jacob Material Scientist (talk | contribs)‎ . . (934 bytes) (+155)‎ . . (undo | thank) (Tags: Mobile edit, Mobile web edit). Prof TPMS (talk) 00:07, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Your user page is already indefinitely semi-protected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 07:57, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. Chase (talk) 03:51, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – User talk pages are not protected except in response to severe or continued vandalism. User blocked, talk page acess turned off, end of conversation. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 07:45, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – High level of IP's recently keep on adding unsourced content to the page and transfer gossip which is not correct. Class455fan1 (talk) 09:00, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Follows a semi-protection of one week earlier this month. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:37, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Created by Sock of User:Malusia22. LG-Gunther :  Talk  00:23, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator HJ Mitchell. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:52, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – To allow TE editors. 11358 transclusion Mlpearc (open channel) 03:38, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Technically this is a reduction in protection level from full, but the template is far older than the Template Editor right. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 07:49, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from IP Hopping Address. LG-Gunther :  Talk  07:05, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Three periods of semi-protection totalling four weeks since mid-May has not discouraged the disruptive editing. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 07:54, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Sro23 (talk) 06:20, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator SlimVirgin. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 07:42, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Due to recent vandalism, and adding nonsense stuff like he came from KFC or something. Just for temporary protection purposes to avoid reoccurring the same incident again. Hamham31Heke!KushKush! 06:31, 21 June 2016 (UTC). Hamham31Heke!KushKush! 06:31, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 07:40, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ERK talk 06:40, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Followed by eleven months of pending changes. A lengthy history of protection in the log. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 07:34, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP users continually ignoring the hidden warning message (which I posted a while ago) and adding Hermann Fegelein to the "See also" section, when Fegelein has no relation whatsoever to the topic "Antics". MasterMind5991 (talk) 07:06, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I see this has been going on since at least 2013! Malcolmxl5 (talk) 07:23, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Can someone please unprotect my user page? Thank you. SW3 5DL (talk) 23:04, 20 June 2016 (UTC). SW3 5DL (talk) 23:04, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Malcolmxl5 (talk) 07:09, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. TJH2018talk 16:43, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. MusikAnimal talk 00:01, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit war on talk page after block. Toddst1 (talk) 22:40, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. kelapstick(bainuu) 22:43, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction in protection level: From full protection to semi-protected. The editor that protected the page is ignoring requests to lower protection or reverting the blanking. Tandrewmark (talk) 10:13, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: You are at fault here, and have been given multiple sufficient explanations as to how your actions are inappropriate. TJH2018talk 16:45, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Are you saying that you are not going to revert the blanking that was consensuated because someone thought I did not behave correctly in the past? Tandrewmark (talk) 19:33, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The protecting admin protects whatever version is current in order to prevent disruption. They do not determine who is correct and take sides (excepting violations of the Biography of Living Persons Policy). Consensus must be determined on the talk page, and then the page can be unprotected from there. So this is Not done. --kelapstick(bainuu) 22:33, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Protect redirect from insults. SLBedit (talk) 22:48, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.. If the IP tries that again, report it at WP:AIV for a block. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 20:58, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther :  Talk  23:43, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There doesn't seem to be much reverting; indeed a recent IP edit, though reverted, was marked explicitly as good faith. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 20:59, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LG-Gunther :  Talk  02:28, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:10, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: While infrequent, the most recent edits aside from a bot and myself have been disruptive, and I doubt this will stop without protection. Snuggums (talk / edits) 05:17, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Sorry Snuggs, but I don't think two reverts a month is particularly onerous. If bad edits occur more frequently, pop back and we'll look into it. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:03, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Also harassment. Few revdelled edits the past couple days. . EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 06:01, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I would really rather leave talk pages as open as possible, particularly ones like this, in order that people can communicate. The revdels have patched the immediate disruption, if IPs screw around in future, go immediately to WP:AIV and request a block. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:06, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Per last attack by multiple IP addresses. GSS (talk) 07:04, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 23:59, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 2602:306:3357:BA0:81FC:22A7:8971:ACBD (talk) 21:57, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 00:03, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. (Quiet for a long time following local wikifame and previous VN. Local schools seemingly on break.) Guliolopez (talk) 22:25, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 00:04, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protracted vandalism by IP hopper. Toddst1 (talk) 22:32, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 22:34, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

22 June 2016

Temporary semi-protection: The player will move clubs soon but it cannot be completed until 1 July. However, a number of IP users seem determined to change it before then. Kosack (talk) 16:33, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:31, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Constant edit warring by POV warriors against tacit consensus by majority of editors, with no discussion on talk page. BilCat (talk) 17:07, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. The current edit warrior has been blocked for 1 day. NeilN talk to me 17:48, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes protection: Due to the list's large scope the page is the target of many COI additions for non-notable and new websites. A pending change protection might help to reduce the spam and would still allow valid additions of notable sites. GermanJoe (talk) 19:47, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I will watchlist and see how this works out. Lectonar (talk) 19:52, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from what might be a number of socks. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:04, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 15:04, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Silly school vandalism from a number of new accounts. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:38, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 15:01, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – User moving page controversially without discussion, despite previously being told it required a requested move discussion. . Joseph2302 (talk) 15:20, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 18:17, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indef Semi, it looks like pretty much all of the recent page history is vandalism and reversion. Seems reasonable to give it similar treatment as Kim Kardashian just to save everyone the time. TimothyJosephWood 17:32, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 18:23, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing IP-range vandalism. JWNoctistalk to me 13:02, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 13:56, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism after person killed in a terrorist attack. SohailKhanzada (talk) 13:20, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. NeilN talk to me 15:21, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page currently being tagged by a block-evading sock. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:16, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Current active example -- samtar talk or stalk 14:18, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 14:21, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: Vandalism/Disruptivel editing. This article need protection. Its is about a recently died person. 175.110.48.234 (talk) 15:03, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:20, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism in face of NBA Finals. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (Complaints|Mistakes) 02:55, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Seems stale now. Lectonar (talk) 12:19, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: High level disruptive editing. – Sabbatino (talk) 05:24, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There are a lot of edits today, but most look good faith to me. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:58, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 08:02, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 13:15, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry for more than a year now. Film's writer/director may be responsible. Details in talk section. Danwroy (talk) 10:27, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 13:15, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Please revisit the page. I made several improvements to the page, which I explained in the Talk section, and they've all been reverted. The author then made several small changes, preventing me from undoing the revert with a simple Undo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danwroy (talkcontribs) 01:22, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vandal user refuses to discuss on talk page. Long cited info being deleted from introduction to further user's genocide denial. Urartu TH (talk) 10:51, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This was discussed in the talk page and Urartu_TH simply refuses to listen to reason. He also deceptively makes claims of "genocide denial" when no such thing has occurred anywhere. The issue at hand is that he removes historical facts that I summarized for the article's intro, in order to REPEAT information (using a biased citation from a person with a conflict of interest on the topic) that is already in the body of the article. He's the one doing vandalizing and deleting pertinent information in favor of reducing the quality of the article because his goal is to repeat links to another article that he frequently visits. See exactly what he keeps changing. Note that he has lied about my intentions in order to create an emotional-appeal (this is a fallacy) and has not assumed any good faith of other users. talk § _Arsenic99_ 17:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You have twisted the scenario into a convoluted mess. You made the first edit in question here. That edit deleted text about the Armenian Genocide which had been summarizing part of the article just as other information in the body is summarized in the introduction. You've replaced it with information that is not cited and not particularly useful to the article in an attempt to whitewash any mention of the Armenian Genocide in the introduction. I've asked you to speak about this on the talk page before editing any further and continuing to remove the information about the Armenian Genocide from the introduction (which is well-cited, is in the body and has been in introduction as a short stigmatization for a long time without issue) but you have continued to vandalize the page. Come back to the talk page and let's continue discussing this issue with the community. What cannot be done is your continued deletion which began with the edit I've linked here. WP:VD states, in relevant part, Even if misguided, willfully against consensus, or disruptive, any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia is not vandalism. You can no longer claim that your edit is being made in good-faith. I've attempted to discuss this with you in the talk page and you've resorted to an edit war while the conversation was still taking place in violation of WP:GF and WP:EW. At this point your actions are pure vandalism. Urartu TH (talk) 19:47, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Semi-protection would have bee useless anyway....Lectonar (talk) 12:20, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from multiple IPs attacking various basketball teams. RA0808 talkcontribs 15:55, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 13:16, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 85.150.181.62 (talk) 16:07, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 13:16, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:46, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only two IP edits today, and one was a self-revert. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:59, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:52, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:59, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Persistent disruptive editing. Donnowin1 (talk) 22:22, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 17:59, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated vandalism. WtW-Suzaku (talk) 00:28, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:00, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 2602:306:3357:BA0:4CA1:53B:DEE9:3A7 (talk) 01:02, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Lots of IPs reverting each other. Great. Somebody point them towards the talk page. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:01, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Redirected per AfD. IP trying to recreate page. . Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:24, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 07:29, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by multiple IPs, removal of references, changes to infobox contents against consensus. Failure to engage on talk page. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 09:14, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The IP edits are good faith and not vandalism (although undoubtedly disruptive). The alternatives would be to full-protect the entire article (to give a level playing field), boomerang block you and semi-protect the page (for the same reason), or do nothing. I'm going for the latter option. If you still get problems, go to WP:AN3. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:05, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks (though I'm pretty sure removal of references does qualify as vandalism, I'll bow to your experience). BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 15:39, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have, on occasion, removed redundant citations from an article citing WP:REFBLOAT or WP:109PAPERS, but I think it's reasonable to assume I don't vandalise anything! Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:44, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Resumption of exactly the same disruptive editing which resulted in the previous semi-protection and which has just expired. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 10:56, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:30, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Extreme levels of vandalism during the past 3 days, so much so that I'm unsure when it stops in order to revert to that version. Thanks, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 13:12, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. The page has been semi-protected by AustralianRupert, which, coupled with a few blocks, seems to have stopped the disruptive editing. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:05, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IP jumper who will not stop harassing this user about off-wiki activities. Sro23 (talk) 14:53, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. the User is not very active at the moment...Lectonar (talk) 07:32, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continuous level of IP and new account vandalism; I count that no less than 44 of the last 100 edits to the page are either vandalism by IPs/brand-new users, or reverts of said vandalism, while constructive edits by IP/new users are rare. While it's not a constant flood (although some days like today have persistent vandals that keep making edits until they get blocked), it appears to be a long-term issue with the page, and it would spare a lot of watchlist frustration for productive editors. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 15:37, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 18:02, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent level of IP disruption / BLP vio. Eagleash (talk) 16:55, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 17:17, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Additions of unsourced rumors. Requesting either semi or pending changes protection. Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:01, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 1 month. Unsourced changes. EdJohnston (talk) 17:12, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template-Protection: edit war. 188.32.101.127 (talk) 17:09, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated damaging edits by changing IP editor(s). JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 17:22, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:46, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection or pending changes: Long-term IP vandalism about his relationship. I can find no reliable sources saying they have broken up, but that is what is constantly being changed. Ebyabe talk - Opposites Attract17:56, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:46, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP has been adding what one user refers to as "word salad." At best it's complete FRINGE and at worst it's just noise. Requesting protection so that they hopefully get the point that their contributions are not valid. Primefac (talk) 18:48, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 07:47, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IPs. Usually one of 3. Andreas George Skinner (talk) 19:05, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:47, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Chase (talk) 19:07, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:16, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Two brand new accounts (possible socks) have appeared just to restore unsourced and unreliably sourced trivia to the article, ignoring the talk page. Random86 (talk) 19:18, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:49, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism/sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Никита-Родин-2002. Part of long-term abuse involving inserting false information about charts/certifications over a wide range of articles. Recent edits by users that aren't autoconfirmed have all been socks. ~ RobTalk 19:26, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:28, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism/sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Никита-Родин-2002. Part of long-term abuse involving inserting false information about charts/certifications over a wide range of articles. Recent edits by users that aren't autoconfirmed have all been socks. ~ RobTalk 19:26, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:28, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent unsourced content/vandalism since protection was last released. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 19:55, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:55, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. SLBedit (talk) 19:57, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:55, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:29, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Both edit warriors have been blocked, so this is rather moot now. Tvx1 01:56, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not done The users who were edit warring have been blocked by Bagumba. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 07:37, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 20:34, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:57, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Template attracts lots of disruptive editing. Tvx1 20:40, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Most edits are not vandalism per se, but good faith edits. The back and forth might be ascribed to the rather complicated system of calculating the actual ranking. Lectonar (talk) 07:58, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism since most recent protection. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:28, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:02, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:52, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:45, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit war between two IP addresses. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:57, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 08:12, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short term IP vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 22:23, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:13, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent spamming. Drchriswilliams (talk) 23:04, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 08:13, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. TJH2018talk 23:19, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:14, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Everymorning (talk) 01:59, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:17, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. BlackCab (TALK) 02:18, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:45, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The exact same section-blanking vandalism has been done a dozen times in the past month, from a number of different IPs. One IP has been blocked for it, but that did not stop other IPs from being used, nor the original IP from returning once the block was over. There have been no non-blanking IP edits during this time, so semi would not be stopping any active editing. (This seems a clear case of this semi-reason in WP:PROTECTION: "Subject to vandalism or edit-warring where unregistered editors are engaging in IP hopping by using different computers, obtaining new addresses by using dynamic IP allocation, or other address-changing schemes such as IP address spoofing"). Nat Gertler (talk) 03:53, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is not enough disruption for semi-protection, but pending changes might frustrate the IPs. Lectonar (talk) 08:19, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent removal of sourced content from potential COI IP user.RioHondo (talk) 06:24, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:54, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent additions of unsourced material from dynamic IP user. Prefall 07:25, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:54, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent additions of unsourced material from dynamic IP user. Prefall 07:25, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:55, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection:  – I'm requesting my userpage to be protected, as I've been reverting vandalism and I don't want any of them edit my userpage. (Protect it's subpages too if possible, and don't protect talk page please) :). INVISIBLEknock! 08:12, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected I have done this, although there was only one instance of vandalism so far. Lectonar (talk) 08:22, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated unexplained removal of referenced text. Due to nature of the removals, they will clearly be back to re-delete as appeard to be band members removing references to their previous bands 78.145.183.212 (talk) 11:03, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:33, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated recent IP vandalism. TheMightyPeanut (talk) 11:15, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:16, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

23 June 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition of future air dates without providing source for said dates. Editor adding the unsourced dates hopes IPs to prevent from being blocked. —Farix (t | c) 10:06, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Farix, I've blocked the 2601:8c:4000:1177::/64 range. Let me know if disruption continues. NeilN talk to me 13:26, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Some IP keeps readding their comment despite it being closed for well over a week, No point reporting the IP as they'll only come back under a new one so filing for protection instead, Thanks, . –Davey2010Talk 16:01, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 2602:30a:c06e:edc0::/64 blocked as well. NeilN talk to me 16:20, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Brilliant thanks Neil, –Davey2010Talk 18:02, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ah I hadn't even realized they'd used numerous IPs so thanks for blocking them all - much appreciated, –Davey2010Talk 18:04, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Under heavy attack from anonymous users. RunnyAmiga (talk) 17:20, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:27, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Recently deleted BLP. Snuggums (talk / edits) 13:00, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Three creates before protection is a general standard. Plus the creates are years apart. NeilN talk to me 13:07, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection. Persistent self-promotion by an IP-roaming crank. Sławomir Biały (talk) 13:35, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:27, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 15:38, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:23, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism of adding false attendance numbers after page protection expires. Please keep this page protected indefinitely so IPs won't be able to change these numbers. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 03:53, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:20, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Various Android operating system pages

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated vandalism by Mailmeaf (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and his countless socks. David Biddulph (talk) 09:43, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. See if that discourages them. NeilN talk to me 13:37, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Continues to have a single editor continue to make edits which have no consensus and which have some pretty apparent WP:COI, all from IPs.

Same editor as last time this page was protected. Could possibly do a range block, but a range admin should look at that. Requesting indef semi as a result. Izno (talk) 13:32, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:51, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Breel Embolo (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Semi-protection:Endless vandalism

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:52, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 13:27, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Not all IP contributions are vandalism, not a high level of editing anyway. Lectonar (talk) 08:04, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High-risk article, has long history of vandalism. MrQueeba (talk) 11:27, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:05, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent additions of unsourced material from dynamic IP user. Prefall 13:03, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:10, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

William Pershing Benedict page is consistently being vandalized and has been partially protected 2 times now. I would like to request permanent page protection.

see examples at these locations "'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=William_Pershing_Benedict&diff=725735760&oldid=725735411

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=William_Pershing_Benedict&diff=725735411&oldid=725734777

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=William_Pershing_Benedict&diff=725734777&oldid=725734552

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=William_Pershing_Benedict&diff=725734552&oldid=725734088

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=William_Pershing_Benedict&diff=725734088&oldid=724546241'"

permanent page protection High level of consistent vandalism. Wsb2232 (talk) 22:24, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 09:26, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The same joke as always, and it's getting old.  ONR  (talk)  08:49, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 09:31, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: LTA sock recreating variations of this and the following (which will never go to AFD as userpages)

WP:AFD/User:Bonadea WP:AFD/User:Amortias WP:AFD/User talk:Bonadea . Amortias (T)(C) 09:40, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done NeilN talk to me 10:01, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continued addition of unsourced/poorly sourced information by IP editors. TriiipleThreat (talk) 12:17, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:03, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP who is removing sourced material is an obvious sock of any banned user. Spartacus! (talk) 16:30, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Indian pov pusher above is adding material from a banned sockpuppet User Freedomouse its funny how he is claiming I am a sock now while he is in cahoots with banned user freedomouse. 2A02:C7D:14FC:C600:7550:5709:B28C:2EA7 (talk) 17:03, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. IP above has been blocked. NeilN talk to me 01:43, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Linguist 111talk 03:59, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Linguist111, I've blocked the 2604:2d80:c029:c000::/50 range for a month. Let's see if that helps. NeilN talk to me 04:07, 23 June 2016 (UTC) Linguist111 I messed up ping --NeilN talk to me 04:08, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 18:57, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:45, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Unresponsive IP edit-warring Mezigue (talk) 22:33, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. If he comes back after his time out, let us know. :-) Katietalk 00:47, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit war between IP's. Sro23 (talk) 03:47, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 04:14, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Long term semi-protection: Immediately after previous protection expired, they are back: [37]. - DVdm (talk) 19:06, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Last protection expired on June 2nd....so immediately is not the word I would have used when the spamming happened on June 22nd... Lectonar (talk) 20:27, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Lectonar: Oops, indeed, my mistake. Thanks. - DVdm (talk) 21:26, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: Extreme level of IP vandalism. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 21:10, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Boing! said Zebedee. Semi-protected; full protection isn't warranted. Katietalk 00:52, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Amccann421 (talk) 00:08, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It's already indefinitely pending changes protected; we just go through these spurts with this article. Katietalk 00:50, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

24 June 2016

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting page be WP:SALTed due to repeated creation. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:40, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 16:23, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – User continuing to user their talk page as a forum/platform to rant about the Brexit vote, which is what they were blocked for. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:22, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. Lectonar (talk) 15:39, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – After a block of 73.81.147.1 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) for edit warring, the same person shows up on a new IP 73.81.154.188 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) to continue the same dispute. clpo13(talk) 15:22, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:01, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. clpo13(talk) 22:39, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Discussion is taking place at the talk-page. Lectonar (talk) 11:11, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing content dispute involving newly registered editors, IPs and socks. -- samtar talk or stalk 15:24, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 15:38, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I believe this page is protected against creation and I would like to create it. I can provide a short draft article is it's possible to get the title unsalted. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:c492:5ab0:85b:843f:ad7f:d207 (talkcontribs) 18:01, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Please create a sourced version of this article in a subpage or your userspace. When this is done, please make the request again, or ask any administrator to move the page for you. Nakon 05:33, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The verdict was announced earlier today re:the police officer who was driving the van with Freddie Gray. We've already had to revert vandalism from several IPs since the news came out and I anticipate more attempts given this page's history. PermStrump(talk) 19:34, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. This is not heavily edited for now. Lectonar (talk) 10:56, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Protected numerous times. See edit summary. John from Idegon (talk) 20:16, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:57, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Long-term low-frequency IP vandalism, changing airdates without edit summary and without providing a citation. BrightRoundCircle (talk) 20:51, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. The last spike was IP 172.xxx....apart from that not a high level of disruption. Lectonar (talk) 11:09, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeatedly recreated. Please SALT. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 11:50, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Jimfbleak. NeilN talk to me 13:46, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple socks and ip's edit-warring over a single paragraph. Ravensfire (talk) 13:22, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:45, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Most of the Ip(s) are just vandalising the page from long time. Spartacus! (talk) 16:02, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:51, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and inclusion of speculation from IPs and new users. – Katanin (talk) 18:44, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:55, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism on current event. DaltonCastle (talk) 04:24, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:11, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Unreferenced and poorly referenced controversial BLP material added by multiple IPs. Binksternet (talk) 23:01, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 04:24, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Unreferenced and poorly referenced controversial BLP material added by multiple IPs. Binksternet (talk) 23:01, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 04:24, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Unreferenced and poorly referenced controversial BLP material added by multiple IPs. Binksternet (talk) 23:02, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 04:24, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Every week when a new episode airs, multiple IP users vandalize the page with unsourced trivia from that particular episode. Heartfox (talk) 19:28, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Nakon 04:21, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Gaijin42 (talk) 03:03, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined It's one editor that you haven't even warned/talked to. NeilN talk to me 04:19, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Decker (S/singer)

Create protection: Page is recreated even though the person fails WP:A7 and has been deleted accordingly. Has been created at multiple titles by the same user. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:38, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Both. Lectonar (talk) 08:03, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The article is about a singer who is known for one thing only, having been a singer in JLS, but an endless string of throw-away single-purpose accounts (with three five new throw-away accounts having edited the article so far today, and four yesterday...), including one, SeanJohnston95, claiming to be his manager, keep rewriting the article, removing what he's known for and adding tons of mostly unsourced "Facebook material", none of it notable. Without even an attempt to discuss what they're doing, and why. Thomas.W talk 15:28, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 04:28, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism on current event. DaltonCastle (talk) 04:26, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Number 57. NeilN talk to me 06:00, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Since the most recent page protection expired on June 15, every single IP edit has been non-constructive. Funcrunch (talk) 05:29, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 05:59, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: High level of unregistered IP vandalism recently. RM-Taylor (talk) 22:38, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 04:22, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Unreferenced and poorly referenced controversial BLP material added by multiple IPs. Binksternet (talk) 23:01, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 04:23, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – significant increase in IP vandalism since this afternoon. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 02:10, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 04:17, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Created and deleted six times, including twice after the deletion discussion. Largoplazo (talk) 03:18, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 04:15, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent WP:BLP-violating vandalism recently. Deli nk (talk) 17:29, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:47, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Very few constructive IP edits. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (Complaints|Mistakes) 21:28, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 01:52, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 22:00, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator BethNaught. NeilN talk to me 01:50, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User:Borcker socking resuming within three hours of unprotection. McGeddon (talk) 22:02, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:38, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced information. Coming from an IP range that has been used by the Green Day vandal in the past, so probably sockpuppetry as well. ~ RobTalk 00:38, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:41, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – NHL hockey player subject of trade rumors. IPs driving by and jumping guns. Echoedmyron (talk) 01:29, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:40, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

25 June 2016

Semi-protection: This page is being vandalised by IP users, they keep changing the name from Arabian to Persian. Abdelaziz1889 (talk) 20:50, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:29, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: UK is being removed from this page, though the UK has not actually left the EU yet(it will be a couple years). 331dot (talk) 12:58, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:18, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Long-term pattern of IP vandalism. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 18:07, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:58, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: UK being added to Past withdrawals, depsite the fact that it hasn't withdrawn yet and won't for at least two years Younotmenotyou (talk) 19:55, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 19:59, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Heavy vandalism from IP users in recent days. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 15:39, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:13, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism – Longterm target of the Telstra-vandal, see User:Huldra/Telstra-socks, Huldra (talk) 16:09, 25 June 2016 (UTC). Huldra (talk) 16:09, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 16:15, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism – Longterm target of the Telstra-vandal, see User:Huldra/Telstra-socks, Huldra (talk) 16:10, 25 June 2016 (UTC). Huldra (talk) 16:10, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 16:16, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Longterm target of the Telstra-vandal, see User:Huldra/Telstra-socks, Huldra (talk) 15:53, 25 June 2016 (UTC). Huldra (talk) 15:53, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Euryalus (talk) 15:57, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Longterm target of the Telstra-vandal, see User:Huldra/Telstra-socks, Huldra (talk) 15:53, 25 June 2016 (UTC). Huldra (talk) 15:53, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Euryalus (talk) 16:00, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Longterm target of the Telstra-vandal, see User:Huldra/Telstra-socks, Huldra (talk) 15:54, 25 June 2016 (UTC). Huldra (talk) 15:54, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Euryalus (talk) 16:01, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Longterm target of the Telstra-vandal, see User:Huldra/Telstra-socks, Huldra (talk) 15:54, 25 June 2016 (UTC). Huldra (talk) 15:54, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Euryalus (talk) 16:01, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Longterm target of the Telstra-vandal, see User:Huldra/Telstra-socks, Huldra (talk) 15:54, 25 June 2016 (UTC). Huldra (talk) 15:54, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Euryalus (talk) 16:01, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Longterm target of the Telstra-vandal, see User:Huldra/Telstra-socks, Huldra (talk) 15:55, 25 June 2016 (UTC). Huldra (talk) 15:55, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Euryalus (talk) 16:01, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Longterm target of the Telstra-vandal, see User:Huldra/Telstra-socks, Huldra (talk) 15:56, 25 June 2016 (UTC). Huldra (talk) 15:56, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Euryalus (talk) 16:01, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Page seems to be the target of a user who has stated they don't care about their blocks and intends to switch IP to evade it. Has already used 3. 331dot (talk) 15:57, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 16:00, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of The Troubles-related IP vandalism on a BLP. Lengthy log. '''tAD''' (talk) 20:44, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected BethNaught (talk) 14:49, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Autobio of non-notable student created three times in three days. OnionRing (talk) 12:32, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. BethNaught (talk) 14:52, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – band article speedy-deleted 10 times db-a7. OnionRing (talk) 12:41, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected BethNaught (talk) 14:44, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated insertion of Harry Potter being Draco's husband - very droll. Chaheel Riens (talk) 14:37, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 14:41, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Previously pending changes protected twice for three months; since there's still virtually no constructive edits; why not extend it and upgrade to semi protected instead? . Ugog Nizdast (talk) 10:06, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Because pending-changes is doing its job; there is no high level of vandalism, and this vandalism doesn't even go "live". Semi-protection would simply be overkill. Lectonar (talk) 08:13, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LG-Gunther :  Talk  10:51, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. This is essentially one IP, 121.xxx....apart form that not a high level of vandalism. Lectonar (talk) 08:15, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: due to concversal "britian left" the EU because of an ongoing vote and process hasn't completed yet. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 16:55, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, I protected the file on Commons but I do not see any evidence of any local misbehavior.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:37, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long term target of the Telstra-vandal, (see User:Huldra/Telstra-socks)--Huldra (talk) 11:39, 25 June 2016 (UTC). Huldra (talk) 11:39, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 12:36, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism by an IP6 (vandalism, changes inconsistent with sourced content, and page blanking). ☾Loriendrew☽ (ring-ring) 23:08, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. By Materialscientist. NeilN talk to me 04:15, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry from IPs. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Beautifulpeoplelikeyou. ~ RobTalk 00:26, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:35, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Beautifulpeoplelikeyou. ~ RobTalk 00:27, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:34, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection edit warring on number of destinations served for the airline. Using another Wikipedia article as a source for Wikipedia per WP:CIRCULAR. 97.85.118.142 (talk) 05:06, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:33, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Article is being edited by new, single-purpose accounts to add the same POV-pushing material. They will not discuss. Montanabw(talk) 03:30, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Looks to have died down. NeilN talk to me 04:07, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Persistent disruptive editing. Player has transfer speculation added to his page from a number of unconfirmed IP addresses.Danieletorino2 (talk) 04:01, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:11, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As this film has just been released, this article will be susceptible to vandalism from numerous IP users over the next week. Areaseven (talk) 10:14, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. And right now there are some good IP edits. NeilN talk to me 04:11, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continuing vandalism on WP:BLP page, following EU vote result. Ghmyrtle (talk) 19:47, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Acroterion for 2 weeks. tutterMouse (talk) 06:14, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: due to controversal "britian left" the EU because of an ongoing vote and process hasn't completed yet. Anonymouse914 (talk) 20:16, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. NeilN talk to me 04:11, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: High level of recent IP vandalism. Has pending changes but semi-protection would be better. Previous protection was lifted.NikolaiHo 02:51, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined No "high level of recent IP vandalism." NeilN talk to me 03:59, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Frequently vandalized by IP edits. NikolaiHo 02:54, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 04:00, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Requesting temporary protection due to high volumes of persistent vandalism since the draft began three hours ago. Draft ends in about 16 hours, so at least 24-48 hour protection requested. Spilia4 (talk) 02:14, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Roughly half of the edits over the past month are IP or new user vandalism or reverts of vandalism. The vandalism includes childish homophobic slurs. Setupgo (talk) 02:18, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 05:47, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Liga MX clubs

Temporary semi-protection: Various IP addresses keep adding and removing unconfirmed signings and departures in all Liga MX teams articles. I suspect is the same person since the edits are very similar. There is also a user who I suspect is a sockpuppet since it does the same type of edits as the IP addresses. It seems the users hears a rumor signing or departure online and add it without investigating if it is true or not. GoPurple'nGold24 07:33, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Can you please provide a summary of the bad IP edits? This is currently too many articles to semiprotect without additional justification. Nakon 04:26, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 2602:306:3357:BA0:39F7:F020:F49F:268 (talk) 22:29, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 04:07, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —MRD2014 T C 22:18, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. NeilN talk to me 04:12, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Nonsense pages repeatedly recreated, apparently for SEO of the article title . OnionRing (talk) 22:24, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Bishonen | talk 22:31, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editors repeatedly replacing sourced content with poorly sourced new info . Sro23 (talk) 23:41, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. NeilN talk to me 04:13, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Shifting IP edit warring the lede sentence over the past few days. McGeddon (talk) 08:29, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 19:45, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sudden spree of disruptive editing by anons and non-autoconfirmed accounts. Entranced98 (talk) 19:56, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 19:58, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please restore semi that was lost due to temporary full protection. Page was protected till after the election in November. Majora (talk) 20:30, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 22:26, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

26 June 2016

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. CeeGee 06:03, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done CeeGee, I see a content dispute with no talk page discussion explaining objections. NeilN talk to me 14:53, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: A copyright violation from its inception--and it could have been speedy deleted as such--this is tended by a single account, who has persisted in restoring inappropriate content, including memorial and promotional text. I've requested the account be blocked, and am posting here, as well, to prevent further need to undo these edits. 73.159.24.89 (talk) 14:14, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done What I have done is revdelled all the copyvios and put the article on my watchlist. Any more copyright violations and the editor will be blocked. NeilN talk to me 14:41, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Perfect. Thank you very much. Cheers, 73.159.24.89 (talk) 15:10, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. TomCat4680 (talk) 20:20, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 21:50, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 17:16, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:26, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Persistent vandalism. This article has been protected twice (once for a week, then for a month) already, and within only a few days, IP address vandals are back at it again. I think it might be time to think of a solution that is a bit more permanent.Fireflyfanboy (talk) 17:30, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:29, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing We've been having notable number of disruptions by IPs in the recent days. IPs remove sourced sales claims and add unsourced ones.--Harout72 (talk) 17:43, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 18:01, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For several months now a roaming ip has been adding and changing information to deliberate factual errors. No other choice now than to semi protect the article. . JOJ Hutton 18:15, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm reluctant to indefinitely semi-protect, we'll see if three months is enough for the IP to lose interest (in this article, at least) Acroterion (talk) 18:23, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection:Inevitable vandalism stream when a footballer scores a goal. '''tAD''' (talk) 14:30, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. '''tAD''', can you please check the latest change? NeilN talk to me 14:50, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
NeilN, the one from Qed? He is an editor of good reputation. He made the goal count accurate, people had been double-counting by updating during the game. '''tAD''' (talk) 14:55, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
'''tAD''', this one (fixed by Qed). --NeilN talk to me 14:57, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lets protect from all disruption until 11 July, when tournament ends. Qed237 (talk) 14:40, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:27, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IPs since the 20th June. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 17:31, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 17:51, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Asdisis socks on various IPs disrupting the talk page. - MrX 11:36, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:41, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you.- MrX 12:25, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. This page has been protected about 4 times now recently. SatDis (talk) 12:16, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:47, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent reinsertion of a POV, which has been reinserted with identical wording around 30 times by now without giving an explanation or so much as a source, by somebody who as of late seems to have taken to hide his IP in order to avoid IP blocking, resulting in a number of one-contribution entries. PJEckenheim (talk) 14:24, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Plus PC 1 year. NeilN talk to me 14:45, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article was previously protected to new and anon edits due to premature addition of coaching and player changes. Last protection expired 06-25 20:51 (UTC) and anon added change at 06-25 22:43 (UTC). I'm sure more will come. Please protect until 07-01 01:00 (UTC). Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:14, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 04:35, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 00:11, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 04:38, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full Protection possible sockpuppetry and adding non-genuine direct flights that require plane changes as per WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT (bullet #7) despite messaging user and adding a hidden note. 97.85.118.142 (talk) 04:40, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Blocked Duyan197281 (talk · contribs) and Andyan200305 (talk · contribs) as obvious socks. Nakon 04:43, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Nakon, Thank you but there will probably be more socks making the same edits in the future. 97.85.118.142 (talk) 04:45, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
We'll continue to monitor these pages to ensure additional disruptive edits are not being made. Thanks, Nakon 04:46, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by The UPN Vandal resumed almost immediately after protection expired. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 16:02, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 04:29, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:53, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 04:30, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:55, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Users warned. Please report if edit warring continues. Thanks, Nakon 04:33, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: An unregistered user with a moving IP address is adding extraneous content with no explanation. Khan_singh (talk) 01:53, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 03:12, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism Edits as User:Malusia22 Sock. LG-Gunther :  Talk  02:10, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Katietalk 03:10, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Please protect it until 1 July. SLBedit (talk) 22:37, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 04:35, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Opencooper (talk) 00:03, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 04:36, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 00:10, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 04:38, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A decent amount of vandalism recently. A protection would help deter vandalism. Tinton5 (talk) 01:10, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 04:39, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring (24 hours should suffice). – S. Rich (talk) 04:20, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 04:40, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. The episode section keeps being changed even though the series itself is only one season. No matter how many times These edits were reverted, IP users would change the section again. Yoshiman6464 (talk) 21:20, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 04:27, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Recurring target by Maelbros sockpuppets, see Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Maelbros. Blake Gripling (talk) 23:07, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 04:28, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Jetstreamer Talk 18:17, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. NeilN talk to me 18:21, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —MRD2014 T C 23:48, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. by another admin. SarahSV (talk) 02:07, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs are still change the logo. Flow234 (talk) 15:42, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Flow234, have you confirmed the logo's authenticity? NeilN talk to me 18:26, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from multiple newly created accounts and IPs. RA0808 talkcontribs 22:11, 25 June 2016 (UTC); edited 22:19, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 22:46, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: BLP being attacked by multiple IPs and new accounts. Meters (talk) 22:18, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 22:46, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and BLP violations by IPs during the past month. Xenophrenic (talk) 17:48, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 2 months. EdJohnston (talk) 21:42, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Quell edit war over images used in article. ViperSnake151  Talk  00:24, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Can't use semi to only block IPs. NeilN talk to me 18:16, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes-protection: Addition of unsourced content started as the protection expired. 175.110.48.234 (talk) 21:21, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 2 months. EdJohnston (talk) 21:45, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

27 June 2016

Semi-protection: Continual reverting and vandalism. Violation of WP:3RR and not apply WP principles of WP:COMMONNAME Brudder Andrusha (talk) 16:26, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Correct! Administrators from WP:FOOTY acted accordingly and set protection. Brudder Andrusha (talk) 17:17, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 17:26, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel_articles_3#General_Prohibition . nableezy - 19:08, 27 June 2016 (UTC) 19:08, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done I feel there's enough ARBPIA disruption to this article that ECP is warranted. Katietalk 20:18, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs (perhaps the same person) have been blanking page,removing AfD tag. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:28, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Widr. Katietalk 20:14, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:00, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 20:14, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: If the news is true, no one should be needing to comment here, as it would be simply plain disrespectful. Omni Flames (talk) 11:39, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. At least not now. Materialscientist (talk) 12:13, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – IP continues to vandalize page after 31 hour block. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:58, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Laser brain (talk) 16:23, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Persistent re-creation of deleted autobiography. Have asked that the responsible account be blocked. Requesting delete and salt. 73.159.24.89 (talk) 15:17, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Laser brain (talk) 16:24, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: A featured article, being vandalized repeatedly by 88.145.12.174, a vandalism-only account who's edits are strictly this addition of bogus information. Dan56 (talk) 10:23, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 11:01, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. DNA75 (talk) 10:40, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:01, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High-level of unsourced or poorly sourced content, and disruptive editing. livelikemusic talk! 12:51, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:44, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Weekly vandalism from IP's stating Ambassador Stevens was killed by Hillary Clinton. Will likely increase during election campaign. 2012 Benghazi attack is semi-protected. - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 14:25, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I considered protecting it until 8 November at least, but I figured we might as well give it a test; we can always reprotect if vandalism resumes in late July. Nyttend (talk) 14:49, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Some block-evading sockpuppet keeps adding the two programs Beast Wars: Transformers and Beast Machines: Transformers to the page! AdamDeanHall (talk) 15:56, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Football manager with new job, silly vandalism from a rival supporters. Red Jay (talk) 11:12, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 12:40, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: high level of autoconfirmed editors adding unverifiable information into the article despite warnings not to. Sceptre (talk) 11:30, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:33, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP BLP vandals. Almost certainly due to the Copa América Centenario Final. Yellow Dingo (talk) 12:28, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:41, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Amaury (talk) 01:00, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:01, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Sro23 (talk) 07:53, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 08:09, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Autobio of non-notable person. OnionRing (talk) 08:31, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. -- The Anome (talk) 09:41, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Amaury (talk) 00:59, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:36, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Target of IP-hopping tag removing vandal, who is also vandalizing user talk pages. Ebyabe talk - Repel All Boarders07:35, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 08:08, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Sro23 (talk) 07:53, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 08:08, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 16:41, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. NeilN talk to me 16:48, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi Protection continued addition of "direct" destinations that require plane changes per WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT (bullet #7). Possible persistent sock puppetry. 107.77.235.34 (talk) 01:29, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

wasn't really denied but users were blocked for possible socks. 107.77.235.34 (talk) 01:42, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already done by administrator CambridgeBayWeather. NeilN talk to me 03:55, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi Protection Last protection had barely expired before Nsmutte (talk · contribs) socks (IP and named user) started up their asinine nonsense again. MarnetteD|Talk 02:33, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator SpacemanSpiff. NeilN talk to me 03:56, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Roaming ip has been adding factual errors to the article for months now. . JOJ Hutton 18:39, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for now - happens once a month or so - just revert it for now. AlexiusHoratius 21:56, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism.(Affiliate Links) SamIX (talk) 21:51, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 23:52, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —MRD2014 T C 01:08, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Mentoz86. NeilN talk to me 01:11, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 17:06, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Katietalk 17:54, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism. - MrX 17:53, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 2602:30A:2CD8:76C0::/64 blocked one week for disruption. Katietalk 17:58, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Long standing BLP violations from a small range of IPs. All from the 108.39.175.x range. If temporary can it be for a longer period of time? The last temp expired and the violations started right back up again. Majora (talk) 18:12, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 22:01, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A roaming ip has been adding deliberate factual Errors to the article for several months. . JOJ Hutton 18:36, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 21:59, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A roaming ip has been adding deliberate factual errors to the article for months. . JOJ Hutton 18:38, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 21:58, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Apparently there is a rumour of his death, and both yesterday and today, new editors and IPs have been adding an unconfirmed death date. I have found a gossip website talking about "unconfirmed reports" but no news site of any repute mentions it, so it is a clear violation of WP:BLP to include it. bonadea contributions talk 18:41, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 21:56, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:01, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 21:52, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:03, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 21:53, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

28 June 2016

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistant disruptive editing and general vandalism from multiple IPs. -- LuK3 (Talk) 17:28, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Cyclonebiskit.. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (Complaints|Mistakes) 20:14, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated attempts by IPs and new users to upload copyvio images. Request protection for about a month until after San Diego Comic Con, where it is likely a new photo will be taken and uploaded that can be used here. Thanks. Ebyabe talk - General Health17:57, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 20:41, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – disruptive ip editing . RF23 (talk) 18:28, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 20:39, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Multiple IPs trying to puff up sales and chart results. Binksternet (talk) 20:30, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 20:35, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated disruption adding a flag design that is being debated by fans of the show. . RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:31, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 20:37, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism regarding the flag used for the show. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:33, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 20:36, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Part of long term abuse introducing false certifications and charts. ~ RobTalk 17:03, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:56, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temp Semi Dozens of IP vandal edits and reverts today. TimothyJosephWood 17:40, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Cyclonebiskit.. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (Complaints|Mistakes) 19:57, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long-term abuse. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Никита-Родин-2002 and archives. Inserting false information about certifications/charts into the article. ~ RobTalk 19:53, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:55, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection:A single purpose login has made and restored deletes of edits that are pure conspiracy nut nonsense. This IP Special:Contributions/203.145.95.186 also adding same material Japanscot (talk) 17:03, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:27, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated editing by blocked user User:Fangusu via multiple IPs inc. 208.54.4.196 70.171.99.129 173.226.147.117 69.42.15.3 172.58.33.83 208.54.39.129 Jim1138 (talk) 18:56, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:24, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long-term abuse adding false information to charts/certifications started up immediately after semi-protection expired. ~ RobTalk 19:15, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:23, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block-evading IP jumped from AN to ANI, may need this for a short bit. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:29, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 hrs, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:40, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Disruption from User:PavelStaykov IPsocks. Sro23 (talk) 16:45, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:54, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —cyberpowerChat:Limited Access 17:06, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 17:13, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:26, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 13:30, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 13:44, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.Sarahj2107 (talk) 14:48, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IPs keep saying he's with the Pacers now but the trade can't be official until free agency begins on July 1. —MRD2014 T C 14:31, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 16:07, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent Semi-protection: This article has experienced a continuous problem with new users or ip addresses who change the article against consensus either due to lack of knowledge about the subject or deliberate vandalism; the most common edit which has been seen for years is the alteration of George Washington's date of rank from 1976 to 1776 [38]. It has almost become a full time job monitoring this article and changing the date back every time it is changed by a new or unregistered user. In addition, there are occasionally far more serious edits which have the potential to start edit wars. The most common of these is altering the article to state that George Washington is a seven star general. A few years ago the edit warring and reverts by new and unregistered users got so bad that there is now a permanent edit notice on the page to avoid these types of changes. If this was an isolated incident or a content dispute, this request would not be made. However, after several years of monitoring this article, it's become pretty clear there is a constant and continuous issue with new or unregistered users editing the article in a controversial way of which 90% of the edits I believe or for no other purpose than to spark a problem. Indefinite semi-protection in this case would solve far more problems than it creates. -O.R.Comms 16:05, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 16:11, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP hopping block evasion. clpo13(talk) 16:09, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Laser brain. Katietalk 16:12, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of spamlinks from multiple IP addresses. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 04:46, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:54, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 11:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 11:25, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and disruption due to transfer rumours as soon as earlier protection expired. Qed237 (talk) 13:02, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:13, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed-protection edit war. 188.32.99.202 (talk) 04:52, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined IP blocked for making same edit as blocked edit warrior. NeilN talk to me 05:01, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Unused. 188.32.101.186 (talk) 05:18, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism from multiple sources. WikiPedant (talk) 05:54, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. WikiPedant, I've blocked 2601:206:4001:d63::/64 and the IPv4 address for 1 week. NeilN talk to me 06:13, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 08:48, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 08:51, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Article was indefinite protected on August 4, 2009. I can't see anything in the edit history that would need a indefinite protection. Seems unnecessary to me. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 09:00, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected--Ymblanter (talk) 10:23, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 22:19, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. The disruptive activity seems to have ended several hours ago. –Darkwind (talk) 04:29, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Trying this again. A roaming ip has constantly adding false information and changing information. This is just one of many articles. It's been going on for months. . JOJ Hutton 23:24, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:52, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – An fight over one member in particular is being waged without sources. Please protect article for one week until sources can be provided. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:13, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:53, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Никита-Родин-2002 part of long-term, persistent, and ongoing sockpuppetry to insert false information about charts/certifications. ~ RobTalk 03:12, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 06:45, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism from multiple sources. WikiPedant (talk) 05:54, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 06:04, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP's keep making joke/test edits. Sro23 (talk) 05:58, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 06:06, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent WP:Disruptive editing by indefinitely blocked Cebr1979 (talk · contribs), who is now IP-hopping to continue his disruption. See the edit history of the Todd Manning article for what I mean, and this. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 06:42, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 06:48, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 74.103.217.48 (talk) 22:48, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 04:03, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Four different IPs are keen to "balance" the tone of a particular sentence in this biography of a historian caught faking Amazon reviews, and have been edit warring and ignoring the talk page thread about it this week. McGeddon (talk) 22:57, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. To force talk. NeilN talk to me 04:00, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. - Yellow Dingo (talk) 04:29, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 04:32, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism today from several IPs. BilCat (talk) 01:52, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator James086. NeilN talk to me 03:56, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: A recent spate of IP vandalism, or facetious edits might be a better term. Mudwater (Talk) 02:01, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 03:43, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:39, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 03:42, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Continued addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content that could be viewed as fancruft information. livelikemusic talk! 16:39, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 23:30, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: I'm the author, designer, programmer and team lead of this game and people keep changing this to reflect inaccurate information for too many years now. Please lock this down. Eric Smith (Zerk) 24.2.73.1 (talk) 20:50, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And please read about Wikipedia and the ownership of content. Lectonar (talk) 20:53, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —Farix (t | c) 01:19, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 02:57, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Being attacked by IPs in the 203.87.133.* range. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 02:18, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 03:40, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – re-created following G4, still non-notable. OnionRing (talk) 15:56, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Business of Blogging"/ Business of Fashion.Com,
"What Is Hypebeast and How Did It Get to an IPO?"/Racked.Com
"Underground fashion king Hypebeast just had the best stock debut in Asia so far this year"/Qz.Com (Qz.Com is owned by Atlantic Media Co., publisher of The Atlantic, National Journal, and Government Executive.)
Maybe I'm wrong but seems to me that Hypebeast is possibly notable. Perhaps all the articles that were previously written about the website have not been the best efforts, perhaps they've just been PR puff pieces but maybe the subject should be given a chance. Shearonink (talk) 16:24, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined One (re-)creation in 2016; the last deletion before that was in 2011 (!), so I do not think a protection is direly needed just now. @Shearonink:...a creation-protection does not mean that an article can not be created. As for chances...pages for protection is not the page to judge that. It would have to go via WP:Refund anyway, as in 2011 the deletion was after an AfD-process, although one with not many participants...Lectonar (talk) 16:28, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Continuous addition of unsourced content (whether actors will be starring in the next season) after the recent season finale. Alex|The|Whovian? 18:39, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:34, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Please consider putting this page under pending changes. Just look at the history and look at how many disruptive changes or any at all have occurred. A group of editors continues to insist on putting a trivial youtube mention in without discussion. Opencooper (talk) 20:35, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:39, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temp semi-protection: High level of vandalism during tonight's match, and it won't get any less since England lost. Struway2 (talk) 21:01, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I hope two days will be enough for the hot-blooded sons of Albion to cool down...Lectonar (talk) 21:04, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

29 June 2016

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Seek admin discussion Varun  13:45, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – There are no recent suspicious edits that would be prevented by semiprotecting the article. There have been no unconfirmed editors at all since May 2015. EdJohnston (talk) 14:09, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

IP 89.17.226.117 deletes the entire text repeatedly after being reverted. CounterEarth (talk) 16:04, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. They were commenting out the entire article. NeilN talk to me 16:08, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Socks came out. NeilN talk to me 16:26, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page, among others, is currently being vandalized by RowingAsia socks. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:20, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 6 months. EdJohnston (talk) 18:07, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IP's repeatedly making unexplained major changes on a daily basis. Sro23 (talk) 17:09, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – Indef. See protection log. EdJohnston (talk) 18:10, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper removing legitimate comment. 331dot (talk) 08:22, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question: @331dot: You want the talk-page protected? Because the main article already is.... Lectonar (talk) 08:49, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected – 10 days for the talk page. EdJohnston (talk) 14:12, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by someone hopping IP addresses. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 12:05, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:24, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent libelous vandalism by IPs. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 14:33, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:07, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. Sir Joseph (talk) 15:01, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done NeilN talk to me 15:06, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing vandalism from IPs and newly registered accounts. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 04:13, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Seems to have died down; please relist if it picks up. Lectonar (talk) 07:49, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 05:25, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 07:51, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Long-term disruptive (173.67.x.x) IP-hopper adding unsourced content, non-reliable sources, and disruptive edits and edit summaries. He has been repeatedly blocked and re-blocked by Admins. Xenophrenic (talk) 06:29, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 07:52, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IPs have been vandalizing the page and being rather derogatory toward console gamers. Gestrid (talk) 07:21, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:52, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. AffeL (talk) 12:44, 28 June 2016 (UTC) AffeL[reply]

Declined Seems to have died down. Lectonar (talk) 07:39, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Philip J Fry Talk 17:50, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Essentially this is one IP, 108.xxx....apart from that not much vandalism. Lectonar (talk) 07:40, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:38, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • In this and all the other UEFA qualifying articles that this user has listed, there has been no vandalism at all in recent days, let alone "persistent". This editor seems to be trying to get the upper hand in a content dispute by misusing this process. 87.112.27.223 (talk) 03:11, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Parties mainly involved (apart from the odd IP-edit) are autoconfirmed, so semi-protection would be useless. Try other venues, like getting a third opinion, e.g. Lectonar (talk) 07:44, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:38, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:41, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:39, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:42, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:39, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:42, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:39, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:44, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:39, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:44, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:39, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:45, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:39, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:45, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:39, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:45, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: The article is currently under a "Pending changes protection". However, IPs are getting their edits approved under this protection, and I still consider it vandalism. Please increase protection to semi-protection. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 04:37, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And not vandalism. NeilN talk to me 05:01, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Gulumeemee (talk) 09:43, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:47, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – spam copyvio repeatedly pasted for low-notability actress. OnionRing (talk) 10:26, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 10:33, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I think the project of adding "kamma" (an Indian caste group) to this article will continue for ever. Can we put it on pending-changes protection?. Kautilya3 (talk) 13:40, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:06, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by Ip-hopping Wikihound.Crboyer (talk) 04:17, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined They're after an editor, not an article. NeilN talk to me 04:33, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by Ip-hopping Wikihound. Crboyer (talk) 04:20, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined They're after an editor, not an article. NeilN talk to me 04:34, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by Ip-hopping Wikihound. Crboyer (talk) 04:32, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined They're after an editor, not an article. NeilN talk to me 04:35, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by Ip-hopping Wikihound. Crboyer (talk) 04:32, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined They're after an editor, not an article. NeilN talk to me 04:35, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. SLBedit (talk) 23:26, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:47, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism and BLP violations. -- LuK3 (Talk) 23:52, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:48, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Continued addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content to the BLP of a high-profile recording artist and television personality. livelikemusic talk! 00:41, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:49, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – continued disruptive editing by IP, changing sourced content without explanation. ☾Loriendrew☽ (ring-ring) 01:53, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 2606:a000:45c7:9200::/64 blocked 1 month NeilN talk to me 02:24, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing of anonymous and/or new registered users. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 04:33, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:50, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of unhelpful IP edits. JMHamo (talk) 07:26, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:53, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Recent uptick in IP vandalism. Dl2000 (talk) 01:08, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 2602:306:8034:2110::/64 blocked 2 weeks NeilN talk to me 01:27, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 04:55, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 3 months. NeilN talk to me 05:04, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by numerous IPs. Egghead06 (talk) 05:08, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 05:20, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long term abuse to introduce false info on charts/certifications. ~ RobTalk 22:09, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 02:35, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 02:21, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 02:33, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – New article. Addition of unsourced dates of birth and other BLP information by edit-warring IPs and new accounts. Dr. K. 03:51, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 04:04, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. MYS77 12:13, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:37, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 16:03, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 01:31, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism and blatant BLP violations since mid-June. -- LuK3 (Talk) 17:30, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:39, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Indef blocked user is copy/pasting articles to their talk page, has been warned to stop, reverted warnings and revisions. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:51, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:55, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection Recreation of Deep Patel, Deep K. Patel, etc. (already protected) by sockfarm. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Editor2626744. Grayfell (talk) 21:16, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 01:42, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – A discussion of the dispute is on going (see talk page), so blocking the editors involved would be counterproductive, but the discussion has not stopped them from continually reverting one another. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:00, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:44, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

30 June 2016

Semi protection IPs continue to add irregular charters which should not be included per WP:AIRLINE-DEST-LIST. IP ranging 223.62.XXXX rapidly undoing edits without explanation (possible sock puppetry).TravelLover37 (talk) 19:01, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There was a bit of back and forth but it's died down now. If it starts up again, come back and file another request. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:44, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Long-term semi protection is only done for persistent disruptive editing after previous short protections have failed, usually deployed on high-traffic BLPs (example). Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:00, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Hello. I'm requesting pending changes protection for a few days for this article due to the impact of the Brexit referendum. Non-registered editors have been consistently adding speculation about citizens requiring visas to go to Europe and, whilst I've been undoing these edits, it may be helpful to have PPC for a few days, maybe 72 hours. st170etalk 20:15, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:20, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent changing of EF3 to the incorrect EF5 by numerous IPs and new editors. This has been going on off and on for quite sometime. Don't think semi-protection is necessary; PC should do as it is just this one issue. United States Man (talk) 01:14, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I appreciate your frustration, however if two reverts a month solves the problem, it generally isn't enough to warrant protection unless you escalate the issue to WP:ANI. I also see the odd good-faith edit from IPs. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:44, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Repeatedly recreated. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 09:50, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. The article was repeatedly created as a copyvio, which means it would be theoretically possible to produce a version that did not (although it may fall foul of WP:CSD#A7 or WP:CSD#G11), so I haven't full protected for that reason. Instead, I have indefinitely blocked the creator until we can be sure they understand what copyright violations are. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:53, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Admin noticeboard for edit warring discussion says this page is facing disruptive edits. Varun  15:10, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 16:48, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page, among others, is currently being vandalized by RowingAsia socks. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:15, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 12:34, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page, among others, is currently being vandalized by RowingAsia socks. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:16, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 12:35, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page, among others, is currently being vandalized by RowingAsia socks. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:16, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 12:36, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page, among others, is currently being vandalized by RowingAsia socks. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:16, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 12:36, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page, among others, is currently being vandalized by RowingAsia socks. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:18, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 12:36, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page, among others, is currently being vandalized by RowingAsia socks. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:19, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 12:37, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page, among others, is currently being vandalized by RowingAsia socks. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:19, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 12:37, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page, among others, is currently being vandalized by RowingAsia socks. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:19, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 12:37, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page, among others, is currently being vandalized by RowingAsia socks. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:20, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 12:37, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Recent edit warring regarding the History section has gotten out of control. NJ (talk) 22:20, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Three days ago a full-protection would have been perfectly justified; however the particpants in the feud have all disappeared and the article has been stable. If it kicks off again, give me a whistle and I'll look into it. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:41, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Please SALT. Repeatedly recreated. . Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 12:23, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Longer periods between the recrations. Lectonar (talk) 12:33, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: I spoke to Dennis Brown about the current TE protection level, which is not actually doing anything because the title matches an entry on the blacklist already (before I realized he voluntarily gave up his sysop bit). — Andy W. (talk ·ctb) 00:43, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Lectonar (talk) 15:09, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Advertisement spamming by IP and newly registered users, who are adding links which are supposedly to new episodes for this show. Not sure whether just pending changes or clear out semi-protection is warranted here. Similar activity was happening at Pretty Little Liars (season 7), where it is currently semi-protected. MPFitz1968 (talk) 21:54, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I think the edit rate is a little too high for PC here. Katietalk 13:07, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Previous protection expired and vandalism started straight away. AIRcorn (talk) 22:08, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:45, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued image removal vandalism by an IPv6 anon user. Warnings have been issued but to no avail. Requesting temporary semi-protection and a block (or range block) of the IP user. NeutralhomerTalk • 05:24 on June 30, 2016 (UTC) 05:24, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:46, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Games development club started in February, created three times in four days. OnionRing (talk) 10:53, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Slug repellent deployed. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:48, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done (for the bot) Katietalk 13:04, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Please SALT this page. Repeatedly recreated (six times under the name Modh Brahmins). Now the user has used an exclamation mark to create page since earlier name has been SALTed on my request. Thanks. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 10:58, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:50, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Please SALT this page too as repeatedly recreated (six times under the name Modh Brahmins and once under Modh Vaniks). Now the user has used a different name to create page since earlier name has been SALTed on my request. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 11:12, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:50, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – specific IP range vandalism. Minima© (talk) 13:06, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:48, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Advertisement spamming by IP and newly registered users, who are adding links which are supposedly to new episodes for this show. Not sure whether just pending changes or clear out semi-protection is warranted here. Similar activity was happening at Pretty Little Liars (season 7), where it is currently semi-protected. MPFitz1968 (talk) 21:54, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I think the edit rate is a little too high for PC here. Katietalk 13:07, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Previous protection expired and vandalism started straight away. AIRcorn (talk) 22:08, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:45, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued image removal vandalism by an IPv6 anon user. Warnings have been issued but to no avail. Requesting temporary semi-protection and a block (or range block) of the IP user. NeutralhomerTalk • 05:24 on June 30, 2016 (UTC) 05:24, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:46, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Games development club started in February, created three times in four days. OnionRing (talk) 10:53, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Slug repellent deployed. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:48, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done (for the bot) Katietalk 13:04, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Please SALT this page. Repeatedly recreated (six times under the name Modh Brahmins). Now the user has used an exclamation mark to create page since earlier name has been SALTed on my request. Thanks. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 10:58, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:50, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Please SALT this page too as repeatedly recreated (six times under the name Modh Brahmins and once under Modh Vaniks). Now the user has used a different name to create page since earlier name has been SALTed on my request. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 11:12, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:50, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – specific IP range vandalism. Minima© (talk) 13:06, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:48, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopper is targeting Sro23's edits on this page. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 02:24, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:46, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopper is targeting Sro23's edits on this page. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 02:24, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Sro23:, if you're getting persistent grief from this across articles, and you haven't done so, I'd consider a thread on WP:ANI requesting a rangeblock. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:47, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism throughout the last week or so. 2 weeks protection may help. Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:52, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Your wish is my command :-) Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:49, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppetry related to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Beautifulpeoplelikeyou. Hopping around to multiple IPs, so semi-protection is the way to go. There's been one month of semi-protection in the past, so an extended period of semi-protection is appropriate. ~ RobTalk 12:49, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As it is an article talk-page, I am somewhat loath to make it longer. If any ohter admin wants to protect for a longer period, go ahead. Lectonar (talk) 12:51, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi protection massive/persistent edit warring regarding new routes, date, and sources among IPs. TravelLover37 (talk) 18:55, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:38, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. – Sabbatino (talk) 20:57, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:39, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of vandalism from IP and new users, due to recent events (hockey player trades) causing a high level of media interest. Roujo (talk) 21:05, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Connormah for 5 days. tutterMouse (talk) 12:27, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. An anonymous IP editor has been removing sourced information and its sources and replacing it with wording that is ether: contradictory to the sources he removed; is highly favorable to one particular beligerent over the others (ISIL in this case); or is per a source that is unverifiable/questionable (pro-ISIL). The IP editor has been reverted by me and several other editors on numerous occasions, but still he keeps continuing to make the edits which are highly POV in nature. PS the Manbij article had also several other IP POV-pushers that have been regularly reverted by other editors. EkoGraf (talk) 05:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. In all articles this is IP 175.xxx Lectonar (talk) 08:10, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated removal of the UK from the page despite the fact the recent EU vote was nonbinding and the UK has not officially left the EU yet. 331dot (talk) 08:43, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:49, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Omni Flames (talk) 08:56, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 08:58, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – re-created three times in two weeks by WP:SPA, small event with zero notability. . OnionRing (talk) 09:03, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Lectonar (talk) 09:41, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP-hopping editor(s) persistently removing a See Also link on both pages. See [39] for more info. clpo13(talk) 23:17, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Both. Lectonar (talk) 08:19, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Page has been semi-protected three times in last ten months. '''tAD''' (talk) 01:06, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:20, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism from IP users. It has not stopped and it keeps happening, every day for years. It takes time to keep undoing vandalism edits from IP users. Game of Thrones is the most succesfull and popular show today and of all time. It needs a semi-protection. User:AffeL (talk)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I think that many of the IP edits are good faith edits, going all the to fanboyish of course; real vandalism is rare imho. Let's try pending-changes Lectonar (talk) 08:23, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Editor is sabotaging the current RfC by adding content to article in question at the RfC while refusing to discuss and follow RfC protocol. Edit warring report also filed. Request that if FPP activated, the version of the article as it was at the time the RfC was filed be restored. -- WV 02:25, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. Lectonar (talk) 08:17, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Binksternet (talk) 03:35, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:16, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Dane2007 (talk) 04:06, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:15, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – We have either one person with 2 IP addresses or meat puppetry, can this be protected? . Doug Weller talk 05:24, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:09, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Please SALT as being repeatedly recreated. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 06:10, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Lectonar (talk) 07:31, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – RowingAsia socks have started to vandalize page. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:35, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Seems to have stopped by now. Widr (talk) 18:07, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Tagged sock of LTA AnnalesSchool (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) has reactivated. Please see IP talkpage for more information. Dr. K. 21:28, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Materialscientist.. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (Complaints|Mistakes) 22:47, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion from User:Vrahomarinaner and now that other vandal who reverts all my edits to annoy me . Sro23 (talk) 21:28, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Barek.. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (Complaints|Mistakes) 22:45, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Several editors keep changing the entire article into an invisible comment. —MRD2014 T C 21:46, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator RegentsPark.. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (Complaints|Mistakes) 22:46, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: This page was set to become unprotected at 20:54 GMT. But however it remained protected past its expiration. What's the problem If it is unprotected, then decline it.

Already unprotected. automatically. kelapstick(bainuu) 22:47, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. RioHondo (talk) 14:50, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:38, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confident articles

Semi-protection: All of these articles safe being vandalized to have "flop" in their titles, and is unlikely to stop without protection at this point. Snuggums (talk / edits) 17:15, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 18:06, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots and lots of vandalism. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:39, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Personal attacks, racist accusations. Two previous short-term protections didn't solve anything.— Maile (talk) 20:54, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]