Talk:Antics
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Antics page. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
are pranks antics?
[edit]Just wanted to know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Albesanti123 (talk • contribs) 03:35, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
Herman Fegelein
[edit]A large consensus of editors feel that a "see also" pointing to "Herman Fegelein" is necessary for this article. On a scale of years, these references have been added, attesting both to the subject's notability and broad consensus that antics are in fact associated with Fegelein. Based on these principles, why shouldn't there be a link to Fegelein on this page? Now the link to Fegelein cannot be found.--24.228.171.252 (talk) 09:10, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- Anything related to Hermann Fegelein is totally inappropriate and does not relate to this article in any way, shape or form on Wikipedia, and it must stop. Please read the hidden warning message in the "See also" section (when editing) before you even think about adding "Hermann Fegelein" to this section. Case closed. MasterMind5991 (talk) 07:02, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
- Well we'll see what the community consensus has to say about that.--24.228.168.22 (talk) 12:36, 29 June 2016 (UTC)