User talk:AffeL

A Barnstar for you

		The Writer's Barnstar
		For your excellent work creating character articles for A Song of Ice and Fire. Keep up the great work! IdenticalHetero (talk) 16:51, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Game of Thrones

The article Game of Thrones you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Game of Thrones for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 23:02, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Peter Dinklage

The article Peter Dinklage you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Peter Dinklage for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of RL0919 -- RL0919 (talk) 17:41, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

True Detective

	Congratulations, it's a...
	...Wikipedia Good Article!! Shearonink (talk) 04:05, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yay.. thanks for the review and all. - AffeL (talk) 11:31, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of True Detective

The article True Detective you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:True Detective for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shearonink -- Shearonink (talk) 04:22, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jon Snow

Hi, I made a few edits on Kit Harington's page. I saw you nominated it for GA. Great job! I hope to see it pass. Let me know if you have any questions. ComputerJA (☎ • ✎) 02:02, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help. - AffeL (talk) 14:07, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kit Harington

Here's my thought process. This is either a) Kit Harington, not wanting to publicise his relationship with Rose Leslie on Wikipedia, b) the reverse, c) a vandal screwing about. WP:AGF says we can't choose option c) if a) and b) are within the bounds of plausibility. If the IP comes back again, drop me a line and I'll have a look - if they're not prepared to communicate with us though, we can't do anything. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 12:46, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Both Kit and Rose have been public about their relationship(See:^[1](Min: 4.24) and ^[2]) If the ip user comes back, I will inform you. - AffeL (talk) 12:54, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What if they've just had an almighty row and split up? Not that I would wish that to happen particularly, but sometimes that's just the way life goes. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 12:58, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

They where seen togheter just a day ago at an event in England, as a couple, holding hands and kissing. So, I don't believe they have parted ways, Even if they hade, a source is needed to confirm it. - AffeL (talk) 13:03, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And they said romance was dead :-) ... okay, I'm leaning more towards option c) now. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 13:08, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

:-D AffeL (talk) 13:15, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, in my warped imagination I have thought of d) a 27-year old bespectacled geek with suspicious facial hair who can't stand that that beastly Mr Harington had the gall to date the delectable Ms Leslie and decides to blank all mention on the internet to make him feel better. However, in practical terms that is close enough to c) anyway, and also d) is more likely not to be an anon IP, but an admin on Commons. (ooooh) Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 13:34, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hahah...Yeah, I would not be surprised if that was the case. - AffeL (talk) 13:42, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ritchie333: The suspicious facial hair guy is back. - AffeL (talk) 14:24, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Banhammered. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 14:27, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ritchie333:. That guy is back, using another ip adress. Wow, he really can't stand Harington and Leslie being a couple. - AffeL (talk) 18:51, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Right, protected it for a week. That should keep things at bay. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 18:53, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

@Ritchie333: The sentence in question, as it currently appears, is clear WP:SYNTH. I don't know what edits you were referring to, and I am not the IP in question (nor Harington, nor Leslie), but I know the content you are talking about and I am not a vandal. Either (a) a new source that explicitly supports the claim needs to be added, (b) the claim needs to be removed, or (c) the claim should be rewritten to accurately reflect the content of the BuzzFeed article (that the "on-and-off relationship" was widely rumoured and it wasn't until 2016 that the two "officially" appeared together at an event as a "couple"). Note that I think (c) might be a BLP-violation and violate WP:SPECULATION, and (a) might not be viable as I don't follow celeb gossip "news" and so don't know if such a source exists. One doesn't need to be a vandal or a COI editor to reach this conclusion -- any editor who understands our policies would reach the same conclusion. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 02:57, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar for you

		The Special Barnstar
		This Special Barnstar is for all the hard work you have done on List of awards and nominations received by Game of Thrones during the last few months. Kingstoken (talk) 23:56, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Death Grips discography FLC

Hi AffeL, I saw the kerfuffle at FLC over unactionable opposes etc, would you now, in the cold light of day, be prepared to strike your oppose at the above? It would be a good gesture and would encourage me to review your list in good faith. What do you reckon? Cheers, The Rambling Man (talk) 07:33, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done. - AffeL (talk) 11:40, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Much appreciated. Review soon! The Rambling Man (talk) 11:41, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man: Just want to make sure if you forgot about the review. - AffeL (talk) 22:15, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Music of Game of Thrones

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Music of Game of Thrones you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Adamstom.97 -- Adamstom.97 (talk) 04:41, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yunshui ^雲 _水 12:57, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AffeL (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked for using multiply account, which I have not done for many months now. After I got warned by an user months ago, I stopped using another account, I even wanted to delete those accounts(did not now how) and start a fresh clean journey on Wikipedia. I can promise that I have stopped and will never ever again use any other accounts other than this one for my own benefits. When I saw that I got blocked and it was about using multiply accounts, I was shocked, being that I have not edited on another account for a while and hade completly stopped. As you can see from my user page, I have contributed a lot on Wikipedia and want to keep doing so, so I don't understand why I'm getting blocked now for something I have done so long ago. I have changed my ways and read and learned about the different rules of wikipedia. Trying to edit and expand pages and revert vandalism. And if I ever, ever do anything even remotely wrong, then you can block me again, forever. So, I'm asking if you please could give me one more last chance. I will behave, I promise. - AffeL (talk) 20:32, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I've read through all of the history here, and it's not making a lot of sense. The claim of "Last time I used another account was in January" seems to contradict this recent edit a few weeks ago. That account was indeed used previously to double vote in AFDs and to avoid 3RRs with your master account multiple times. You've also recently created another sock account, so far unused, but no idea what you were thinking. To lift your previous indefinite block for socking, you said "again.. another CHANCE, if I fail, block me again.FOREVER!" The problem with continuously acting in a deceptive manner, is that we simply have no idea when to trust you. My suggestion would be to take a long time off and make a more transparent unblock request. Kuru (talk) 12:18, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

AffeL, can you link to the place where someone told you to stop socking this January? I remember you promised to stop socking back in 2014, but early this year you used the Peter account to cast three double-!votes in merge, move and deletion debates, and also quickly logged out of the AffeL account and into the Peter account to undo an edit that you apparently felt you had made under duress, and make it look like someone else was doing it.[1][2][3] (Note that, despite the farcical game AffeL and his sockpuppet played on GAN, he still brags about that GAN on his user page, which appears to be what he is referring to above with As you can see from my user page, I have contributed a lot on Wikipedia.) You also apparently created the sleeper account JasonC74 to help you in the various edit wars you were engaging in in early June, but didn't get around to it, apparently because you were told off by an admin before you got a chance. The only reason you were caught this time was because, for some reason, you chose to log into the Peter account again last week and make a piecemeal edit, even though there was a request for CU currently open. You say I got warned by an user months ago, I stopped using another account, but I can't find that warning.

I accidentally editen a small edit once with Peter the account after, used another browser, did not know I was logged in with another account. - AffeL (talk) 10:22, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. Found it. @TAnthony: what do you make of the above? Were you aware, when you politely asked AffeL to stop socking rather than opening an SPI and requesting CU, that AffeL had previously been unblocked based on his promise never to sock again? Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 23:31, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's also worth noting that in February AffeL explicitly denied that he was operating the Peter account: I will no longer and have not used any other account.. It's nonsense, of course, to say "will no longer and have not used", but it makes a bit more sense if one interprets "will no longer" as referring to his confirmed socks from years earlier, and "have not" as a denial of the recent socking. He also claims above that I even wanted to delete those accounts(did not now how) and start a fresh clean journey on Wikipedia was a few months ago, but all he said a few months ago was I will no longer and have not used any other account..; the "deletion" request was back in 2014. This kind of evasive language, IDHT behaviour is why AffeL should have been blocked months ago, even if he were not actively socking. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 23:45, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Any admin reviewing the above unblock request should bear in mind that AffeL's "expand[ing of] pages and revert[ing of] vandalism" have been a source of much disruption in the past few months, and in fact he has been told off multiple times for referring to other editors' valid edits as vandalism and using "vandalism" as an excuse to get around 3RR.

It should also be noted that the apparent contrition expressed in the last three sentences of the above appeal very closely mirror the appeal that led to his unblock back in 2014.[4] i have abused multiply accounts. ... I seriously understand what I have caused, I would like to delete all of my accounts that I have created and start my life as a Wikipedia user from scratch. ... I know I can't say it was a long time ago, but for me it was. I don't feel comfortable give my age away but believe me i was just a kind when I was making does edits, reason I been unblocked is cause i was using different accounts when really when i got block form one i did made another one and sooo on and soooo on. ... This block is unnecessary cause i wanna help, help me, i messed up, i did wrong. what more is it to say i'm guilty, i made bad choices and i learned from them. ...just another chance, that's all i ask or putting an expire time on my block :( please He has not apparently learned anything since writing that three years ago, except that feigning contrition is a good way to get unblocked.

Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 23:18, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I was blocked for using multiply account, which I have not done for many months now is clearly more evasive language. CU was only permitted/performed, as far as I can tell, because there was an SPI open, and the SPI was opened because AffeL was very obviously logging out in order to get around 3RR. Either AffeL is lying when he claims he has read and understood our socking policy, or he has read and understood it, and is deliberately being evasive about the recent, disruptive sockpuppetry he was engaging in. (I say "recent, disruptive" since the logged-in Peter edit last week was benign and the disruptive double-!voting and "bad hand" activity was more than six months ago, while logging out to get around 3RR is just as much a violation of our socking policy.) Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 00:14, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Hijiri88: Thanks for the ping. I was unaware of any previous sockpuppeteering on AffeL's part when I called him on some socking in February 2017. I looked the other way in November 2016 because his "opponent" in the dispute was blocked; I discovered the subsequent activity a couple of months after the fact, and the PeterD12 account had no recent edits. I had no idea about the JasonC74 account, and I am disappointed if (as seems to be the case) AffeL was actively using it only a few months after my message. I suppose I should not have settled with his pat promise to never do it again.— TAnthony^Talk 00:35, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

13557 edits and he's still getting there and their mixed up. That's worthy of a indefinite block by itself isn't it? — IVORK _Discuss 06:19, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@IVORK: He's done a lot worse than that, not least the above rehash of his false contrition from 2014 and openly claiming that his "I have not used other accounts" this February had been a sincere promise never to do so again. I'm not sure how many false promises to change the community can take before his latest indefinite block is upgraded to a site-ban, but if anyone considers unblocking him they should first make him accept a clear unblock condition, such as "indefinite 1RR and an indefinite Game of Thrones topic ban". Making fun of his poor spelling and grammar kind of cheapens the serious disruption he has caused, and if anything might mislead a passing appeal-reviewer into thinking those of us who have been begging and pleading for him to change are just being petty. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 07:00, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Last time I used another account was in January, and I promised in February not to ever use another account, other than this one ever again. I have never used the JasonC74 account, frankly I don't even remember having it, not even sure it's mine. I have not used another account for such a long time now and have also totally stopped doing so. User:Hijiri88 have a beef against me, so it not a suprise he is here commenting. I promise that I will do better, so please don't block me for something I did so long ago and have clearly stopped doing for now half a year. I'm contributing on Wikipedia almost every day. So, please give me one more chance. And if I ever do something wrong, then you can block me forever and I will never come back. - AffeL (talk) 10:22, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't realize you were logged in to the Peter account? Meaning you intended to !vote twice in your own name? Caught with your pants down, AffeL—there's really no squirming out of this one. Curly "JFC" Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 11:37, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was talking about the edit I made last week with that account, not the ones I made before I was warned and promised to quite. - AffeL (talk) 14:18, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ahem. While I appreciate that the block on this account is a cause for relief for some other editors, a couple of the comments above veer a little towards gravedancing. If you have something pertinent to add regarding the block (and please note that this block is specifically for checkuser confirmed sockpuppetry, not for disruptive editing, personal attacks or anything else) please do, but tangential evidence of disruption and character assassination are not helpful to the reviewing administrator. I'm not aiming this at anyone in particular, but would suggest that if you want to add a message here, consider first whether you are here primarily to help or to gloat; if it's the latter, maybe don't. Yunshui ^雲 _水 12:01, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Kuru: You said that I recently created another sock account. But I have read that "multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons". I did not do use that account for any illegitimate reasons. When I said that "Last time I used another account was in January", it is true. As I mention above, "I accidentally editen a small edit once with the Peter account after January, used another browser, did not know I was logged in with another account" So that was the reason for that little small edit I made, Link: (this edit". Why am I getting blocked now, after I have clearly stopped using or doing anything wrong since January, that's seven months ago, and I regret all the things I did and want to do better. Like I said, please, give me one more chance, and if I do anything that is even remotely wrong, then just block me for good from editing on wikipedia and my own talk page. And I will never ever come back ever again. Just let me prove myself. Please. - AffeL (talk) 14:35, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A few hours ago: "frankly I don't even remember having it, not even sure it's mine," and now you're claiming it was a legitimate alternate account? For what? Dude. Kuru (talk) 15:09, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I did not remember having it, but then I looked at my mobile phone, I saw that I was logged in with that account. I think I just wanted to be logged in on my phone, so that I could do a simple straigh forward edit if I ever saw something when surfing on my phone(with out having my ip shown). But another reason is that I do not remember my password for this account(AffeL), that's why I did not log in with this one on my phone. But I regret all of this, and have logged out of that account from my phone. I just don't understand why I'm getting blocked from this. I have stopped using any account other than this one after the first month of this year. The one time I used the Peter account was an accident. I regret all of this and want to show that I can change. Please, give me a chance, And if I do anything disruptive or anything wrong what so ever. Then some one can just ping an admin and block me for good, with out any more chances. Please, these stuff I did was more than seven months ago, I have been editing every day these seven months from just this account, promoting articles to GA and Fl. Please give me another chance, I know very well that what I did was wrong. I have completely stopped with the sock accounts and I want to move forward, from now on. Doing good stuff and being helpful. - AffeL (talk) 15:50, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Kuru: In AffeL's defense, you are talking about two different accounts. The account AffeL claims not to recall is JasonC74, while the account he acknowledges making a single recent edit from is PeterD12. The recent Peter edit didn't pertain to any contentious changes; all it did was wikilink the names of four actors. I don't see any reason why he would have deliberately tried to obfuscate his involvement in this edit, especially as, in recent weeks, he has openly made edits that were contentious. I do recall, however, that some editors thought that this edit by an IP might have been AffeL, and perhaps some other similar reversions by IPs to the same article around the same time. It was discussed here, and I'm not sure if those edits were ever investigated. --DavidK93 (talk) 18:16, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, he's claiming that he didn't recall the JasonC74 account, and then he claimed it was for some legitimate purpose. The other account, PeterD12, was obviously used as an abusive sock. Sorry, I don't buy the "legitimate use" for mobile. Maybe you can convince someone else. Good luck. Kuru (talk) 18:24, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm saying that I did not plan to use the Jason account for any illegitimate reasons, that's why their is not a single edit made with that account or another one since January. I have been clean after I got warned and promised that I won't ever do socking. That was seven months ago. What have I done in these past months to warant a block. I want to edit on wikipedia, with out any disruption. Can't I get a chance to prove myself? - AffeL (talk) 20:00, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Music of Game of Thrones

The article Music of Game of Thrones you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Music of Game of Thrones for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Adamstom.97 -- Adamstom.97 (talk) 01:02, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Game-of-Thrones-S06-E08-No-One.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Game-of-Thrones-S06-E08-No-One.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 06:38, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Game-of-Thrones-S06-E08-No-One.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Game-of-Thrones-S06-E08-No-One.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Game-of-thrones-s01-e08.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Game-of-thrones-s01-e08.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:11, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Game-of-thrones-s02-e02.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Game-of-thrones-s02-e02.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Orphaned non-free image File:Warcraft (soundtrack).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Warcraft (soundtrack).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:47, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Game of Thrones RT scores S1

Template:Game of Thrones RT scores S1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 14:40, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Game of Bones listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Game of Bones. Since you had some involvement with the Game of Bones redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. –Davey2010^Talk 22:44, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Game of Butts listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Game of Butts. Since you had some involvement with the Game of Butts redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. –Davey2010^Talk 22:46, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Game of Thranes listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Game of Thranes. Since you had some involvement with the Game of Thranes redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. –Davey2010^Talk 22:50, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Filmography table

Hi, I know you're indeffed and all that but on the off chance it might change I'm just leaving this here,
I've undone all of your changes here - Year goes before title and all of that table crap isn't remotely needed either so don't add it again to that article or any other, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 00:15, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Extract of Light of the Seven Fair by Ramin Djawadi.ogg

Thank you for uploading File:Extract of Light of the Seven Fair by Ramin Djawadi.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Better Call Saul ratings

Template:Better Call Saul ratings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --wooden superman 15:23, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Beat the Drum Soundtrack.jpg

The file File:Beat the Drum Soundtrack.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-free album cover being used in a decorative manner in Beat the Drum#Soundtrack. Non-free album cover art is generally allowed to be used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about albums, but its use in other articles is generally only allowed when the cover art itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary as explained in WP:NFC#cite_note-3 and the context for non-free use required by WP:NFCC#8 is evident. There is no such commentary for this particular album cover anywhere in the article, and the use of soundtrack album cover art in articles about films or TV programs is generally not allowed for this reason as explained in WP:FILMSCORE

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:55, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Fright Night (soundtrack) cover.jpg

The file File:Fright Night (soundtrack) cover.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-free album cover being used in a decorative manner in Fright Night (2011 film)#Soundtrack. Non-free album cover art is generally allowed to be used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about albums, but its use in other articles is generally only allowed when the cover art itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary as explained in WP:NFC#cite_note-3 and the context for non-free use required by WP:NFCC#8 is evident. There is no such commentary for this particular album cover anywhere in the article, and the use of soundtrack album cover art in articles about films ,TV programs or stage productions is generally not allowed for this reason as explained in WP:FILMSCORE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:36, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Peter Dinklage as Simon Bar Sinister.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Peter Dinklage as Simon Bar Sinister.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:18, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Emilia Clarke has been nominated for discussion

Category:Emilia Clarke, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --wooden superman 14:26, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lena Headey has been nominated for discussion

Category:Lena Headey, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --wooden superman 14:28, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Mr. Brooks Soundtrack.jpg

The file File:Mr. Brooks Soundtrack.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-free album cover being used in a decorative manner in Mr. Brooks#Soundtrack. Non-free album cover art is generally allowed to be used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about albums, but its use in other articles is generally only allowed when the cover art itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary as explained in WP:NFC#cite_note-3 and the context for non-free use required by WP:NFCC#8 is evident. There is no such commentary for this particular album cover anywhere in the article, and the use of soundtrack album cover art in articles about films or TV programs is generally not allowed for this reason as explained in WP:FILMSCORE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:18, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Game of Thrones-S03-E01-Valar Dohaeris.jpg.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Game of Thrones-S03-E01-Valar Dohaeris.jpg.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:36, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Game of Thrones-S03-E02-Dark Wings, Dark Words.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Game of Thrones-S03-E02-Dark Wings, Dark Words.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:37, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Game of Thrones-S04-E03-Breaker-of-Chains.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Game of Thrones-S04-E03-Breaker-of-Chains.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:45, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Game-of-thrones-s02-e02.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Game-of-thrones-s02-e02.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:51, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Game-of-thrones-s02-e05.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Game-of-thrones-s02-e05.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:51, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Game-of-thrones-s02-e07.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Game-of-thrones-s02-e07.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:53, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Game-of-thrones-s02-e08.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Game-of-thrones-s02-e08.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:55, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Stannis Baratheon-Stephen Dillane.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Stannis Baratheon-Stephen Dillane.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Joffrey Baratheon-Jack Gleeson.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Joffrey Baratheon-Jack Gleeson.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Ytoyoda (talk) 00:30, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The High Sparrow-Jonathan Pryce.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The High Sparrow-Jonathan Pryce.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Ytoyoda (talk) 00:33, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Missandei-Nathalie Emmanuel.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Missandei-Nathalie Emmanuel.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Ytoyoda (talk) 00:34, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sandor Clegane-The Hound-Rory McCann.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sandor Clegane-The Hound-Rory McCann.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Ytoyoda (talk) 00:38, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tywin Lannister-Charles Dance.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tywin Lannister-Charles Dance.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Ytoyoda (talk) 00:40, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Renly Baratheon-Gethin Anthony.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Renly Baratheon-Gethin Anthony.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Ytoyoda (talk) 00:43, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Robert Baratheon-Mark Addy.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Robert Baratheon-Mark Addy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Ytoyoda (talk) 00:44, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bronn-Jerome Flynn.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bronn-Jerome Flynn.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Ytoyoda (talk) 00:50, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tormund Giantsbane-Kristofer Hivju.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tormund Giantsbane-Kristofer Hivju.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Ytoyoda (talk) 00:58, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Roose Bolton-Michael McElhatton.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Roose Bolton-Michael McElhatton.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Ytoyoda (talk) 00:59, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ramsay Bolton- -Iwan Rheon.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ramsay Bolton- -Iwan Rheon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Ytoyoda (talk) 01:00, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Davos Seaworth-Liam Cunningham.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Davos Seaworth-Liam Cunningham.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Ytoyoda (talk) 01:01, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of awards and nominations received by Westworld

Hello, AffeL. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of awards and nominations received by Westworld".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 08:48, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ygritte-Rose Leslie.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ygritte-Rose Leslie.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Red Dawn (soundtrack) cover.jpg

The file File:Red Dawn (soundtrack) cover.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-free album cover being used in a decorative manner in Red Dawn (2012 film)#Soundtrack. Non-free album cover art is generally allowed to be used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about albums, but its use in other articles is generally only allowed when the cover art itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary as explained in WP:NFC#cite_note-3 and the context for non-free use required by WP:NFCC#8 is evident. There is no such commentary for this particular album cover anywhere in the article, and the use of soundtrack album cover art in articles about films or TV programs is generally not allowed for this reason as explained in WP:FILMSCORE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:12, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Night King for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Night King is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Night King until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:21, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ygritte for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ygritte is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ygritte until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 14:31, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ygritte-Rose Leslie.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ygritte-Rose Leslie.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:49, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Olenna Tyrell-Diana Rigg.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Olenna Tyrell-Diana Rigg.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:12, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gold Derby Awards for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gold Derby Awards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gold Derby Awards (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 18:35, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"GA Thrones" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect GA Thrones. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 17#GA Thrones until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 14:15, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Walkingdeadlogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Walkingdeadlogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Viserys" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Viserys and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 15#Viserys until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 20:58, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Marlowesawyer.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Marlowesawyer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gilly-Hannah Murray.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gilly-Hannah Murray.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:21, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Theon Greyjoy-Alfie Allen.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Theon Greyjoy-Alfie Allen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Person of Interest: Season 3 & 4 (soundtrack)

The article Person of Interest: Season 3 & 4 (soundtrack) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NALBUM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:59, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Person of Interest: Season 2 (soundtrack)

The article Person of Interest: Season 2 (soundtrack) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NALBUM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:59, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Person of Interest (soundtrack)

The article Person of Interest (soundtrack) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NALBUM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:59, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Person of Interest (soundtrack) cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Person of Interest (soundtrack) cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:52, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Person of Interest Season 2 (soundtrack) cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Person of Interest Season 2 (soundtrack) cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:53, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i0YbPrLdyeg

[2] ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qA1t6o1IsrQ

[1]

[2]