Talk:Jackée Harry

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Article title

If her "best known as" stage name is a mononym, shouldn't this article be at Jackée (which currently redirects here)? --McGeddon (talk) 10:01, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 29 June 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. Assertions in favour of either title, no definitive evidence produced. Jenks24 (talk) 20:06, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jackée Harry → Jackée – Per the comment above, if that is really the name she's best known by, it should be moved per WP:COMMONNAME. nyuszika7h (talk) 11:12, 29 June 2016 (UTC) --Relisting. Eventhorizon51 ^(talk) 14:48, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support - per WP:COMMONNAME. Cheers, Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 11:25, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - in the past her common name probably was just Jackée but I don't think it is anymore. Her social media accounts are all under "Jackée Harry", and while IMDb shows that she recieves credits as Jackée occasionally these days, it's far rarer than her full name. A search for Jackée on Google News brings up articles that all use Harry. Nohomersryan (talk) 14:32, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Nohomsryan has it right. This is essentially the same kind of case as Beyoncé Knowles, John Cougar Mellencamp, and Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson (formerly best known as Beyondcé, John Cougar, and The Rock), and unlike cases like Madonna and Cher which remain consistently mononymic in virtually all current sources. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 22:11, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Nohomsryan - She goes by Jackée_Harry so makes sense to have the article the same . –Davey2010^Talk 19:42, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – A tough one. Either title is probably fine. (She's definitely been credited both ways over the years...) However, I think Jackée Harry is slightly preferable on WP:NATURALDIS grounds. But as long as one redirects to the other, then either is probably fine... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 13:37, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.