Talk:Partialism
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there. |
Merger proposal
[edit]I propose that the article on armpit fetishism should be merged to this article. - Stillwaterising (talk) 16:10, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
Room For Improvment
[edit]I suggest adding more information to this article, the information on it is good, but not very in depth. I also suggest combining this with another article of similar nature to more easily describe it. AshleyHarper101 (talk) 06:56, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
Binarism?
[edit]Might this fail to take into account nonbinary gender? "Partialism occurs in heterosexual, bisexual and homosexual individuals." see Binarism 50.0.18.32 (talk) 05:32, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
- We go by what the WP:Reliable sources state. And like the Bisexuality and Pansexuality articles note, bisexuality is not considered binary to everyone. A lot of people don't consider it binary, and consider pansexuality an aspect of bisexuality. Flyer22 (talk) 22:17, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Partialism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130617202117/http://jamaica-gleaner.com:80/gleaner/20080531/features/features7.html to http://jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20080531/features/features7.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:13, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Partialism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20080531/features/features7.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120426091314/http://datingchicagosuburbs.webege.com/2011/12/specific-body-part-fetish/ to http://datingchicagosuburbs.webege.com/2011/12/specific-body-part-fetish/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120426091319/http://www.legsandheels.com/dcforum/DCForumID1/7.html to http://www.legsandheels.com/dcforum/DCForumID1/7.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:19, 23 March 2017 (UTC)