User talk:Musicpoplover12

Welcome!

Hi, Musicpoplover12. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Snuggums (talk / edits) 22:27, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Hello, I'm SNUGGUMS. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 00:10, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please see this. Snuggums (talk / edits) 00:11, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Snuggums (talk / edits) 22:17, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Confessions Tour. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 07:19, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Prismatic World Tour

So why is Mexico listed as North America then? Latin America is a region, and tours don't go to regions. They visit continents. — Calvin999 19:35, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Calvin999: Here is the reason Latin America is used rather than South America. Leg 6 has both North and South America countries in this leg. Latin America was easier to say because earlier when this edit was made way back earlier, it looked messy when it had an additional row to say 'North America - Leg 6,' so we used Latin America to combine this part of the table. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 20:03, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Music Barnstar
		For all the work you do on tour-related articles. Keep it up! Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:47, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@SNUGGUMS: Thank you so much! I remember when I would always ask you for help, now I'm able to contribute with an article on my own! Musicpoplover12 (talk) 02:57, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure. Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:00, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fearless Tour etc.

Please explain your reversions. You stated "we use names that were used at the time". I didn't change that at all. Every visible link to a venue remained the same after my changes, and the ultimate destination for each link remained the same - I simply removed superfluous piping so that the visible name would redirect to the current name. If you meant "we pipe to names that were used at the time someone added that informaton to the article", why do you do that? What's the point? Here's an explanation of my changes:

The names of venues tend to change because of sponsorship deals with naming rights. A redirect provides a simple way to ensure that all links to an old name will go to the article under the current name. Piping an old name to the current name or a former name is pointless because if the name changes again, as it surely will when the current sponsorship deal comes to an end, the piped name will itself become a redirect and the already trivial benefit of a direct link will be lost. This has already happened in many cases - for example [[Baltimore Arena|1st Mariner Arena]] simply pipes the name to another name which has since been superseded, and is now itself a redirect.

Here are some relevant extracts from guides to best practice in piping and redirects:

From Wikipedia:Piped_link#When_not_to_use:

It is generally not good practice to pipe links simply to avoid redirects. The number of links to a redirect page can be a useful gauge of when it would be helpful to spin off a subtopic of an article into its own page.
Introducing unnecessary invisible text makes the article more difficult to read in page source form.
Non-piped links make better use of the "what links here" tool, making it easier to track how articles are linked and helping with large-scale changes to links.

From Wikipedia:Redirect#Do_not_.22fix.22_links_to_redirects_that_are_not_broken:

There is usually nothing wrong with linking to redirects to articles. Some editors are tempted, upon finding a link to a redirect page, to bypass the redirect and point the link directly at the target page. While there are a limited number of cases where this is beneficial, there is otherwise no good reason to pipe links solely to avoid redirects. Doing so is generally an unhelpful, time-wasting exercise that can actually be detrimental. It is almost never helpful to replace [[redirect]] with [[target|redirect]].

Colonies Chris (talk) 08:27, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Colonies Chris: I'm sorry if I did harm, but there are some things to understand about clicking an old name. One of my pet peeves when I click an old name, most say "redirected to". What I'm simply doing is not make the article say "redirected to". I've been editing tour pages for a while, and always made sure links don't say "redirected to". Sorry if I did any harm, I was trying to make sure people weren't messing with links. Also, there were edits you made that removed cities and countries' hyperlinks. For example, I noticed links like Washington, D.C. And United States were removed. Was there a reason to remove those? Again, sorry if I did harm. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 17:05, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects are one of the strong points of Wikipedia - that one article can intentionally be redirected to another, without having to manually pipe every reference to a superseded name. It's a way of encoding knowledge for the benefit of other editors - for example, an editor can just link "Trumpton Stadium" without needing to know that it's currently called "National CheeseBurger Arena" - the redirect will automatically take the reader to the current name. And when the name changes again, only the redirect needs to change. (Another similar use is for things that don't have ther own article - an editor can link to a specific aircraft model such as a Lockheed C-56B Lodestar without needing to know that it's actually covered in the article Lockheed Model 18 Lodestar, because the redirect encapsulates that knowledge.)

I unlinked common items in line with Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Linking#What_generally_should_not_be_linked - specifically "The names of major geographic features and locations, languages, nationalities and religions". Ther's no value in linking "United States" or "London", or "Asia", for example - no reader is ever going to click on them - whereas they might want to find out something about lesser-known places such as Helsinki or Caracas or Missoula, Montana.

Colonies Chris (talk) 19:34, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Colonies Chris: Oh, okay! Thanks for the clarification! Musicpoplover12 (talk) 19:48, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Red Tour

I am so sorry because I undo your edits. Please edit The Red Tour again because IP vandalize the page. I undo the page 2 times so maybe I can be banned by the 3RR if I do the third time :( Phamthuathienvan (talk) 14:51, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on The Pinkprint Tour. And please don't scream at them in edit summaries by using all-caps. [1] -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 19:03, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Archived url's

I use the Wayback Machine's archived url's as trusted citations for in the future, because artist's websites tend to change from time to time. It doesn't matter whether the North American tour is over or not. The article requires those archived sources to prove that those dates were posted on Demi's website at the time as they aren't visible anymore. Same goes for song articles in which you provide sources for which date they impacted radio, you'll have to archive it as well, otherwise you lose the source. So, please do not remove the archived url's I added, thanks. Give Your a Break 16:05, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Urgent Help

Magnolia677 have reported me to the Wikipedia administrator for vandalism on my recent edit on MGM Grand Garden Arena, place take a look at my edit history and the message that I have left on his/her talk page. Magnolia677 reverted my edit because they are unsourced. However, I felt that I am being unfairly treated becahse he/she reported me for vandalism despite the fact that I have provided my references.. He/she seem to be very strict with WP:VERIFIABILITY & I felt he/she have something against me. The only reason why I provide bare URLs instead of full proper reference is because there was something wrong with my laptop & I find it very difficult to do so on my mobile edit. I have been blocked twice previously for unsourced edit. I urge you to talk to Magnolia677 as soon as possible to avoid any further conflicts and misunderstanding. In case if I didn't reply you, it means I am blocked so you may wish to leave me a message on my talk page as it is the only page I can edit. Thank you very much my dear friend. Xinyang Aliciabritney (talk) 11:25, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Musicpoplover12. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dangerous Woman Tour

Thank you for your injection of common sense. — Calvin999 09:27, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fan4Life is at it again, not listening. — Calvin999 19:36, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Calvin999: You're welcome. If Fan4Life keeps making these edits, I may have to go on this account's talk page and explain that tour pages put a date on the end date regardless if it ended or not. Usually, I never have to go on someone's talk page, but I might have to if it keeps up. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 21:05, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And no there's an IP who is doing the same thing, hmm — Calvin999 10:02, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Calvin999: So, Fan4Life took matters, and referred my edits as vandalism when clearly, they are not. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 18:51, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I just don't get it. He/She is completely ignoring MoS. It's made the history unstable, it's created an edit war, deliberate provocations, citing unsourced info for this 'we know it's not the end' nonsense, ownership and fancruft. Unbelievable. — Calvin999 22:16, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, IP 188.175.152.230 is 100% Fan4Life. I've been undone again. — Calvin999 23:50, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OVERLINK and linking nations

Please read WP:OVERLINK. U2 touring in a nation does not require a link to that nation. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:13, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joanne World Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Inglewood. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mandalay Bay Events Center, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:58, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Magnolia677: Hi. Not sure why you reverted my edit. All the other numbers on the table are not sourced, and it's also because the numbers are provided in the tour article, so I just transferred the numbers from the tour article to the venue article. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 14:32, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have tagged the section as unsourced. If you could please add a source to your edit it will start the improvement. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:42, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to American Airlines Arena. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:50, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding promotional text about upcoming concert performances that are months or years away. Please wait until after they have occurred, then add them to the venue article with a source. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:38, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Lambeau Field‎, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. AntiVan (talk) 02:32, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Memories Do Not Open Tour) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Memories Do Not Open Tour, Musicpoplover12!

Wikipedia editor Bennv3771 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I suggest you add a "reception" section to all the tour articles you create, there are lots of critical reviews from reliable sources for these tours.

To reply, leave a comment on Bennv3771's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Bennv3771 (talk) 07:58, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tacoma Dome help

Would you like to help this new editor? I see that you've been active on this page in the last year. — RossO (talk) 17:25, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Musicpoplover12. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mania Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wells Fargo Arena (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kehlani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Halsey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OVERLINK

With this edit, it appears you violated WP:OVERLINK. Do we need a link to these countries to understand the tour? Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:54, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Upcoming tours

Please read WP:NTOUR to see why I turned the article into a redirect and removed the link in the navigation template. In this case, sources that merely establish that a tour will happened are not sufficient to demonstrate notability. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:33, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Thrill of It All Tour for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Thrill of It All Tour is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Thrill of It All Tour until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --wooden superman 14:15, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Adventures of Kesha and Macklemore for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Adventures of Kesha and Macklemore is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Adventures of Kesha and Macklemore until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --wooden superman 11:23, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Suburbia Tour for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Suburbia Tour is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suburbia Tour until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --wooden superman 08:35, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Musicpoplover12. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Voicenotes Tour

The article Voicenotes Tour has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NTOUR

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --wooden superman 14:38, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Something in the Water (music festival)

Hello, Musicpoplover12,

Thanks for creating Something in the Water (music festival)! I edit here too, under the username QueerEcofeminist and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

* Please don't copy and paste text from other sites to here that is not allowed on wikipedia, as it's copy right violation. * Provide reliable references to your article WP:RS. have a look at our guidelines on notability of events please look at WP:EVENT

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|QueerEcofeminist}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

QueerEcofeminist^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 10:43, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Revival Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Verizon Center (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Beerbongs & Bentleys Tour

Hello, Musicpoplover12,

Thanks for creating Beerbongs & Bentleys Tour! I edit here too, under the username Willsome429 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Even in the beginning stages of the page, please add reliable sources to verify your information.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willsome429}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 22:48, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Happiness Begins Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Big Rob (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:00, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

D.R.E.A.M. The Tour

Please stop reverting my edits on D.R.E.A.M. The Tour regarding the shows. The tables are divided and sortable because each table should allow for MOS:ACCESS#Tables. WP:CONCERT#Tables states "To meet WP web accessibility goals, tables normally should include a caption, scope of headers ( ! scope="col" | and ! scope="row" | ), and other concerns as outlined in MOS:DTAB and MOS:DTT. The latter also advises against including column headers in the middle of the table (such as those spanning several columns) and provides examples." Chrisnait (talk) 15:34, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to keep consistency for all tour pages. I've edited many tour pages in the past that did not require to create separate tables for separate legs. Keeping it all in one table keeps it organized all in one place. I do understand that making separate sections make for easier editing, but I created D.R.E.A.M. The Tour just like all the other tour pages I created. Again, please look at all my contributions on my user page, User:Musicpoplover12, which shows all tables are organized all in one and not separate sections. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 08:16, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I know you wan't to keep consistency, but those are the rules for tables on WP. Your behavior makes me believe that you feel that you "own" the article, which is a violation of WP's rules (see WP:OWN). Chrisnait (talk) 16:49, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not trying to "own" the article. I just created the article to follow similar articles I created. Also, if the rules are there, shouldn't all tour pages be discussing this matter rather than discussing just this one? I'm trying to make sense of this because the discussion should be brought to all tour page if this rule there. Just wondering that since we are talking about this. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 20:50, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The rule for concert tables was added in October 2019. Because the new rule hasn't really been noticed, several articles still use the outdated format for concert tables, including the ones I've made and this one. Since there are hundreds and hundreds of tour articles on WP that need to be updated. When I get the chance, I'll update my concert pages to use the new table format. Before, I was planning to expand D.R.E.A.M. The Tour, but I just don't have the time to do all of that now. However, I will eventually expand the article. I'm sorry for accusing you for owning the article, but I was just trying to follow the rules. Chrisnait (talk) 21:22, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Map of the Soul Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saitama (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Brightside World Tour

The article Brightside World Tour has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable per NTOUR: it’s basically just a list, without coverage of the tour as a whole—and I do not see such coverage online either.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of entertainment events at the Golden 1 Center for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of entertainment events at the Golden 1 Center, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of entertainment events at the Golden 1 Center (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]