User talk:Anastan
Your signature
[edit]Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font>
tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.
Additionally, your signature appears to go against WP:SIGAPP, which says to avoid markup that enlarges text.
Please change
--'''<font face="Perpetua" size="3">[[User:Anastan|<font color="#1E90FF">Ąnαșταη</font>]] ([[User talk:Anastan|<font color="#1E90FF">ταlκ</font>]])</font>'''
: --Ąnαșταη (ταlκ)
to
--<b style="font-family:Perpetua">[[User:Anastan|<span style="color:#1E90FF">Ąnαșταη</span>]] ([[User talk:Anastan|<span style="color:#1E90FF">ταlκ</span>]])</b>
: --Ąnαșταη (ταlκ)
—Anomalocaris (talk) 19:22, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Anastan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Anastan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Category:Serbian people by status has been nominated for discussion
[edit]Category:Serbian people by status, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 18:38, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Brutalism
[edit]I’ve left a response on the Talk:brutalist architecture page requesting that you stop removing relevant photos of prominent brutalist buildings and replacing them with Le Corbusier's non-representative precursor. I’d appreciate some cooperation in trying to improve the page, rather than your knee-jerk reverts and the continued inclusion of non-illustrative photos. Perhaps do something to improve the sources and citations in the article.gentlecollapse6 (talk) 20:45, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Mentioned
[edit]Hello Anastan. Your name has been mentioned at User talk:EdJohnston#Paid advocacy accusations. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 15:00, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Per the comments there, I see an argument for you to strike out some of your recent comments in move discussions. If matters like this get taken to AE, the result is not always very satisfying. It is better to compromise before we get there. EdJohnston (talk) 16:21, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- If you don't remove your charge of 'organised and paid political advocacy' you are risking a block for WP:ASPERSIONS. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:09, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
September 2020
[edit]This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
--Maleschreiber (talk) 16:16, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
DS alerts
[edit]If you try to post DS alerts on talkpages of editors who have already been made aware of them in the past 12 months, the preview itself informs you that you shouldn't make that edit. Thank you.--Maleschreiber (talk) 15:52, 8 September 2020 (UTC)