Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2016/04

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2016

01 April 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Once again, this article has come under heavy fire from editors who cannot agree with romanization. Areaseven (talk) 16:01, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 16:35, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: high level of strange IP vandalism. — Andy W. (talk · contrib) 16:24, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 16:34, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Page was vandalized often, my talk is also vandalized sometimes. Laber□T 20:23, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done kelapstick(bainuu) 20:36, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:23, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done kelapstick(bainuu) 20:35, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. -- Mehrdad Afshari (talk) 06:15, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Only one of the two anons are introducing vandalism, the other is editing constructively MusikAnimal talk 16:12, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: BLP policy violations – IP users, new users, and autoconfirmed users keep adding that she died. Peter Sam Fan 15:46, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by requestor Unless this is an April Fool's joke, reliable sources have confirmed she died. Peter Sam Fan 16:18, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Anoms keep removing CSD from article. reddogsix (talk) 20:10, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected after deletion kelapstick(bainuu) 20:14, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent WP:DE and Edit Warring by IP. MBlaze Lightning -talk! 14:09, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are a very active member, which is respectable, but you seem to be so active that you don't have the time to actually learn the situation when butting in. Once again, I referenced the information I added. Where's the dispute, and where's the POV? Surely you should be more concerned with whoever accused me of "nationalistic POV"? 5.29.102.252 (talk) 14:10, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I fail to see how my editing is disruptive, considering the fact I have only tried to add a referenced biographical fact about Emelianenko's ancestry? First of all, I tried resolving it on the talk page. Ironically, those who shout the loudest "use the talk page" seem to ignore it the most.
Secondly, here's what the dispute is about. Emelianenko stated in an interview that he's of Russian ethnicity, when asked. I have added it to his "early life" section, with two references. However, the next thing is that it gets removed, and I get accused of "nationalistic POV." I'm not a nationalist, and I fail to see the "POV" in him stating that he's of Russian ethnicity?
Was the person who wrote in de Niro's article that he's of Irish and Italian ethnicity accused of a "nationalistic POV"? 5.29.102.252 (talk) 14:12, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined. This is just one IP, and the protection is not warranted. The talk page discussion already started, and if there is no progress, they should be blocked, protection is not a solution.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:29, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection or Indefinite template protection: Disruptive editing, multiple vandalism editions and issues by unregistered and registered users.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 10:55, April 1, 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AS this is an article, template protection is inappropriate. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:04, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection or Indefinite template protection: Disruptive editing, multiple vandalism editions and issues by unregistered and registered users.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 10:55, April 1, 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. see above. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:05, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection or Indefinite template protection: Disruptive editing, multiple vandalism editions and issues by unregistered and registered users.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 10:56, April 1, 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. see above. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:06, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 22:19, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Seems to have stopped MusikAnimal talk 15:13, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 22:54, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MusikAnimal talk 15:15, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A recurrent vandal on various IP addresses all starting with 70. keeps changing the mayor's name to Pouleau. More recently they changed the entire city council to the characters from the board game Clue. This combination of stupid vandalism and minor BLP violations needs to stop. Happy Squirrel (talk) 02:52, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MusikAnimal talk 15:20, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection. Bobherry Userspace Talk to me! Stuff I have done 14:06, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Widr (talk) 14:25, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – 4 days straight of User:Fangusu IP sock edits. Steel1943 (talk) 16:25, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:34, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – An edit warring is going on without discussion. - Mar11 (talk) 17:24, 1 April 2016 (UTC). Mar11 (talk) 17:24, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator RegentsPark. Katietalk 18:51, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 18:39, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 18:49, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 22:22, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 15:14, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – disruptive/vandalism. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 23:35, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 15:17, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent disruptive edits. Immediately after coming off pending changes protection on Wednesday, a group of IP's has been continually adding very poorly sourced (and sometimes completely unsourced) information. Katniss 13:42, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 14:28, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection. © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 06:07, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why?--Ymblanter (talk) 07:44, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Lectonar (talk) 08:40, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection. © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 06:08, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why?--Ymblanter (talk) 07:44, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Lectonar (talk) 08:40, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations. George Ho (talk) 21:36, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:41, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Borcker. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 21:48, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:25, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: WP:RIP; see also WP:AN#Deceased editor. Izno (talk) 12:09, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected--Ymblanter (talk) 12:26, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Girls Club season pages

Indefinite semi-protection: Never ending stream of IP editors changing the cast outcome tables. Always unsourced. Oftentimes changes are small (e.g., changing voluntary leaving to forced removal). I see no reason for the first 14 seasons to be changed so often given that they are all finished. Pages have been targeted in the past by sockpuppeting (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Thestarborn1028) and I suspect that this is mostly a continuation of that socking. Frankly tried of having to watch these pages due to constant vandalism. Please ping me if you have questions. Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 19:33, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AussieLegend can attest to the vandalism on these pages too. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 19:34, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Whoops. Season 5 and Season 9 are already indef semi protected by Mr. Stradivarius and Qwyrxian, respectively, from back in 2012. Season 10 has pending changes. Season 12 is semied until 04:35, 29 April 2016 by Slakr. Season 13 is semied until 01:27, 18 April 2016 by MelanieN. Season 15 is semied indefinitely by Widr. I've struckout the non-indefinitely protected pages. Still requesting indefinite semi protection on the rest. Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}}
Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 10:52, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long term Abuse of User:TV5Ozamiz. LG-Gunther :  Talk  04:05, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 06:09, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long term Abuse of User:TV5Ozamiz. LG-Gunther :  Talk  04:06, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 06:09, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopper persistently removing content/changing toll numbers. See 1 2 for examples. Spirit Ethanol (talk) 10:31, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:54, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous fringe POV-pushing by IPs, socks of banned user. Constantine 19:28, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:47, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Borcker. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 21:50, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Materialscientist for 6 months. tutterMouse (talk) 05:12, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: There should be no more nominations to delete after this year. Eyesnore 01:13, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is it needed? It's never been created even once. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 01:26, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Preemptive protection for 2017. The joke has outlived itself. --kelapstick(bainuu) 01:27, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Except the fact that pages are not protected pre-emptively. Yes, I agree the joke has become old and overused to the point where it isn't fun anymore, but it's not like it's been created yet. --TL22 (talk) 01:30, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. I already closed 7th so if it is created, that's fine but it's not like a troll re-creating a poorly designed version. That would support protection. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 01:33, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I think we can flag this as Not done kelapstick(bainuu) 04:06, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Toddst1 (talk) 22:44, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Short but let's hope the editor quits the spamming after that time. Ricky81682 (talk) 01:28, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued addition of unsourced speculation and information of an album that has yet-to-be-released by a high-profiled pop music artist. Also, on-going sock-puppetry. livelikemusic talk! 23:24, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Drmies for 1 month. tutterMouse (talk) 06:02, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Constant vandalism- insertion of Genghis Khan images by Supreme Genghis Khan's socks. TheCoffeeAddict talk|contribs 03:03, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:12, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – pending changes has not slowed the vandalism one bit. please change to long term semi. Most of the vandalism is coming from redlink accounts, some from IPs. No constructive edits from either. John from Idegon (talk) 18:44, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Blocks have been placed. Widr (talk) 19:12, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: An IP user has added content to this article 6 times in the past 2-3 weeks. It would be nice if that person would create an account and engage on the talk page. Semi-protection might lead to that. Blue Rasberry (talk) 19:24, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 21:13, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 00:06, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 00:13, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

02 April 2016

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism over the past week. Yeepsi (talk) 00:05, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:21, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: IP vandalisms, few already warned but continue doing so. Aura24 (talk) 01:18, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:24, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Speculation has been constantly added since last night. JC · Talk · Contributions 17:59, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:46, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring over section name despite discussion on talk page. There doesn't appear to be consensus either way. clpo13(talk) 18:06, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:45, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism/test edits from multiple IPs. Kendall-K1 (talk) 18:19, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:43, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated edits against a clear long-standing consensus (see talk page, and text in article explaining why madrasas don't qualify for the list...), in spite of attempts to make them understand why their edits are being reverted (see page history for an endless string of IP edits doing the same thing...). Thomas.W talk 19:29, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:41, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Opencooper (talk) 23:18, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:17, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:GlobalPageantHistorian (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). VQuakr (talk) 07:18, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:05, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Favre1fan93 (talk) 13:52, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 14:04, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:06, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Widr for 48 hours. tutterMouse (talk) 16:55, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Billy Chan should be RPP also. Wgolf (talk) 16:10, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Katietalk 16:32, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 05:08, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Katietalk 16:05, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is subject to persistent vandalism from IP users, who input the host country for the 2017 contest. Such information won't be known until the winning country has been determined at the final of the Eurovision Song Contest 2016 on 14 May. Wes Mouse  00:26, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 11:13, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. MBlaze Lightning -talk! 10:54, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, I see content dispute, but I do not see edit-warring which would justify protection. Please continue discussing at the talk page.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:04, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Needs to be re-protected after vandalism has resumed following un-protection. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 15:51, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 15:54, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sockpuppetry, block evasion by User:Cnslrken2. Binksternet (talk) 06:19, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 14:07, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See page history. Nothing but persistent sockpuppets pushing a non-NPOV agenda into the article over the last few months. Satellizer (´ ・ ω ・ `) 12:13, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 14:06, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring by IPs. Binksternet (talk) 12:14, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 12:31, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent long IP POV-pushing / low-rate but long term edit war. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 13:42, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:51, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Article is continually edited disruptively by sockpuppets of a banned editor. GigglesnortHotel (talk) 19:53, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., too frequently edited for pending changes--Ymblanter (talk) 10:53, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – native name of the university is being removed without any reason by IP accounts. Abesam (talk) 19:54, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:15, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppetry, block evasion by User:Cnslrken2. Binksternet (talk) 06:18, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 11:15, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Serbian political parties / Progressive Party

Semi-protection: Recall of previous issue two weeks ago which resulted in temporary semi-protection of these two pages + one template. Persistent IP reverts of updates to political party composition, no valid explanations given in edit summaries. Farolif (talk) 03:56, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done, 3 months pending changes for the articles and 3 month semi for the template Ymblanter (talk) 10:42, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Blocked user using the unblock request to troll/vandalism. RickinBaltimore (talk) 21:02, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Talk page access revoked. Widr (talk) 21:12, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done, doesn't look like any disruption has occurred since the revocation. tutterMouse (talk) 10:27, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting temporary protection of this article due to vandalism and unconstructive IP edits. --Another Believer (Talk) 07:46, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:37, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-vandalism on article under WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. Huldra (talk) 18:53, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected BethNaught (talk) 07:21, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of potential edit warring/content removal in the last 48 hours by multiple IP's. Suspect IP's include: 178.232.151.70, 46.15.53.30, 178.232.254.57, 46.212.32.227, 89.8.6.16, 46.212.18.160, and 89.8.215.45. Possible sockpoppetry, as several of these IP's have made edits only to this article. GabeIglesia (talk) 19:42, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Yamaguchi先生 for two weeks. tutterMouse (talk) 05:47, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit war about possible retirement. Laber□T 05:46, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 05:54, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 11:42, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Seems to have died down. kelapstick(bainuu) 22:12, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive edits. An IP-hopping editor has been repeatedly making the same disruptive edits nearly every day for the last week. Deli nk (talk) 11:57, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. kelapstick(bainuu) 22:13, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: A double redirect which now can't be corrected because it is protected. Admin who protected it is inactive, hasn't edited since 2006. From full protection to no protection. TVShowFan122 (talk) 14:52, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already unprotected by administrator MSGJ.. Steel1943 (talk) 05:11, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: – Persistent Vandalism and Removal of Mass Contents/Blanking by IPs and Non-Confirmed New Users. MBlaze Lightning -talk! 08:32, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. kelapstick(bainuu) 22:08, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – many parts of the article are biased and opinions. Coder m (talk) 09:29, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. kelapstick(bainuu) 22:10, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Near daily vandalism, could maybe use semi protection for rest of NBA season (until mid June).Smmurphy(Talk) 11:27, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 21:32, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: This widely-used template has already been vandalized once for April Fools' Day - as it's a "requirement" for jokes, I'd recommend it be protected so that it's still recognizable. Possibly the same for Template:April fools as well, and possibly redirects (I'm not too sure how this works). ansh666 02:20, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined only four hours left on 1 April, I am sure this is watched enough... I hope. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:08, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: No longer going to be funny after repeated nomination of the same page. There should be no more nominations after this. Eyesnore 04:20, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined As much as I agree that this joke has outlived itself, this is preemptive, and not in line with current protection policies. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:00, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism of a BLP. Huldra (talk) 12:38, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 22:13, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – two weeks after semi-protection ended. George Ho (talk) 17:23, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Katietalk 18:52, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Disruptive editing, multiple vandalism editions and issues by unregistered and registered users.Shazbots(talk) 17:15, April 1, 2016 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:07, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

03 April 2016

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page has been subjected to an incredibly persistent stream of vandalism. Hy Brasil (talk) 18:56, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:18, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Laber□T 19:37, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:37, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Neverending vandalism/disruptive editing. The moving of the Sadie's Song entry has been going on for months now... and some user keeps trying to add a google doc as a source. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 20:12, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 20:24, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. High visibility due to upcoming elections. Prone to edit wars.Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 04:26, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:37, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. High visibility due to upcoming elections. Prone to edit wars.Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 04:26, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:36, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – About 1700 transclusions. 333-blue 12:02, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected--Ymblanter (talk) 18:33, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: not sockpuppetry. --BasBibi (talk) 14:22, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, at this point, this article should not be edited by accounts which are one day old.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:35, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The page was protected before (28 Feb 2016) due to persistent disruptive editing. [1]. After protection expired, IPs and new registered account(s) started their disruption again [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. Just like previous disruptions, they falsify referenced content and adds false/irrelevant content to article. These new disruptive edits are similar to old disruptions (same edits and same IP-range). Zyma (talk) 03:49, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:22, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism such as removal of sourced content again started as soon as the article is unprotected. Aisonajulk (talk) 05:45, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 18:24, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent WP:DE and Vandalism by IP's and Non-Confirmed new users. MBlaze Lightning -talk! 05:54, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 18:23, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Content dispute and edit warring. Non-stop reverts by anonymous editors (IPs) and other involved editors. Zyma (talk) 15:41, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 18:22, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of IP's making incorrect changes. Tvx1 23:28, 2 April 2016 (UTC). Tvx1 23:28, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 18:18, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:09, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 18:14, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This page was previously semi-protected at least twice before in order to stop an anonymous vandal using a morphing IP from inserting, reinserting and edit-warring over blatant original research opinions. The vandal is incapable of understanding how to cite sources, in addition to being incapable of rational discourse. The only proven method of stopping the vandal is to semi-protect the page for long periods of time.--Mr Fink (talk) 02:14, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 18:13, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Laber□T 07:51, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator BethNaught. Widr (talk) 18:04, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes. Laber□T 07:51, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator BethNaught. Widr (talk) 18:04, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: relentless IP vandalism ([7], [8]). IP warned numerous times by various editors. Ignores and blanks his talkpage. Case opened at ANI for edit warring. Quis separabit? 14:27, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Cyphoidbomb. Widr (talk) 18:03, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Resumption of long-term IP vandalism.Cordless Larry (talk) 15:20, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 18:00, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite protection: Persistent subject of WP:BLP vandalism. Previous temporary semi-protections haven't stanched the disruption. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 16:48, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 17:58, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sock puppetry - RD trolling. 2604:6600:0:10:216:3CFF:FE3E:3D91 (talk) 17:44, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Mike Rosoft. Widr (talk) 17:56, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – 133 transclusions, and very important for NBA team articles. 333-blue 01:26, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected--Ymblanter (talk) 14:51, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Addition of defamatory images. Laber□T 11:10, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 11:32, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Due to the recent conflict, it has seen over 50 bits of vandalism and reverts. Winterysteppe (talk) 14:31, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:33, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. LG-Gunther :  Talk  10:08, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 13:20, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry: spam from socks of User:Supreme Genghis Khan. . TheCoffeeAddict talk|contribs 10:57, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 11:34, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent editing by different unregistered users and addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Accireioj (talk) 12:18, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 13:18, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.2602:306:3357:BA0:9174:C861:F5B7:6C5B (talk) 21:30, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by GorillaWarfare for 2 weeks. tutterMouse (talk) 11:09, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Murry1975 (talk) 00:50, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done as an admin generally can protect their own talkpages if they need to. tutterMouse (talk) 05:38, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Timothy Leary (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Unprotection: At dispute is a claim in the lede paragraph that Timothy Leary was, among other things, a philosopher. Strongest opposition came from one particular editor who had been unsuccessfully edit-warring (please see [9], finally dragging the matter through 4 different drama boards, the latest result being the current 4-day protection.

This morning I made an edit request in 2 edits ([10], [11]) asking that 6 WP:RS citations clearly identifying Leary as a philosopher be added to the one that was already there. My request has been denied, [12] pending "consensus".

This is unhelpful. What we have is a simple content dispute for which the sources are plentiful. If you place control solely in the hands of administrators, it only makes sense that you evaluate edit requests based on our guidelines. Adding 6 reliable sources to cite a really trivial claim should not require waiting for a consensus. It should only require applying the guidelines, the same way we'd expect anyone closing an AFD to apply the guidelines, not just count noses. The page has spent enough time at the drama boards and administrator "help" is not helping. It's time to unprotect it. If there is more edit warring, the proper response should in the future be to go after the edit warrior, not allow him to manipulate administrators into closing it down from everyone. Msnicki (talk)

I am the "particular editor" Msnicki is referring to, but as anyone who reviews the edit history of Timothy Leary will find, the most recent full protection of the article happened because of edit warring in which I was in no way involved. The edit warring was being done by other editors entirely. I would suggest that Msnicki not use requests for article protection/unprotection as a means of pursuing a vendetta against me. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 03:14, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not done simply because the clock ran out. tutterMouse (talk) 05:30, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Wgolf (talk) 03:49, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Bongwarrior for 2 weeks. tutterMouse (talk) 05:36, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. High visibility due to upcoming elections. Prone to edit wars.Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 04:26, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done., if there's an edit war then those involved should take it to the talkpage instead of discussing it in edit summaries. tutterMouse (talk) 05:35, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. High visibility due to upcoming elections. Prone to edit wars.Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 04:26, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. back in February, are you sure this is the article you meant to request protection for? tutterMouse (talk) 05:33, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tesla Model 3

Temporary semi-protection: To protect from high levels of IP vandalism, as the Tesla Model 3 was unveiled. This is likely to result in vandalism as it a controversial company. 78.146.137.190 (talk) 23:32, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - many of these edits look okay. Vandalism not really out of hand. AlexiusHoratius 19:20, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. George Ho (talk) 00:35, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - there has been a fair amount of vandalism, but not quite enough in my opinion to warrant protected and pending changes isn't possible on talk pages. AlexiusHoratius 19:23, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: While not very frequent, recent edits inserted unsourced (and likely inflated) figures to box score, which I doubt will stop without semi-protection. Article has previously been protected for up to three months for similar issues. Snuggums (talk / edits) 19:12, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 19:41, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Renew pending changes: Despite low editing, almost no IP edits have been accepted. --George Ho (talk) 21:32, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 19:16, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP socks by user User:Yourname vandalizing the sandbox. Datbubblegumdoe[talkcontribs] 21:50, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - major disruption appears to have ended. AlexiusHoratius 19:16, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Several seldom used accounts are making similar changes to the article against consensus. Murry1975 (talk) 15:46, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This article falls under WP:TROUBLES and is subject to a 1RR restriction. I don't see as these editors have been notified, however, so I'll do that now. If 1RR is violated, WP:AN3 is thataway. Katietalk 16:17, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple editors and IPs removing songs from set list even though it is sourced, adding fabricated revenue figures and attendance figures, messing around with the table disfiguring it. Last good revision here. .  — Calvin999 19:41, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:51, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

04 April 2016

Renew pending changes: Vandalism doesn't die down; it's still there, especially yesterday. George Ho (talk) 23:12, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Lectonar (talk) 11:45, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection - page is topic of major current news event, with high user traffic and already various counts of vandalism by IPs. Philip Terry Graham 16:04, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 17:43, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued persistent vandalism due to series' current season airing on television by IP's and anonymous editors. It is becoming highly disruptive. livelikemusic talk! 16:04, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 17:43, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection - IP addresses have been trying to spam their homegrown distros over the past few days. - Aoidh (talk) 16:50, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 17:42, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection - Continued IP vandalism of article. I will not continue to revert as the Ip just will continue changing it back. --BabbaQ (talk) 17:00, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Widr (talk) 17:41, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP vandalism, been protected before because of similar edits. Peter James (talk) 17:33, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 17:41, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf (talk) 21:48, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Bishonen | talk 21:51, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection or Indefinite template protection: Disruptive editing, multiple vandalism editions and issues by unregistered and registered users.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 3:08, April 4, 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:14, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Deleted at AfD but always recreated by sockpuppets. Qed237 (talk) 21:23, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Lectonar (talk) 21:28, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Article has been semi-protected for more than four years. It is time for unprotection. If the vandal returns, which is unlikely after this long, it can be temporarily protected again. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:15, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @Ged UK:, the protecting admin.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:20, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done I have downgraded that to pending-changes...will watchlist for a bit and unprotect if it seems appropriate. Lectonar (talk) 21:33, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism from this reddit thread jnestorius(talk) 19:24, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:28, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Bill Plympton (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Temporary semi-protection: An IP-hopping IP in the range 144.13 has taken over making the same uncited edit about a film, for which there is no evidence is in production. This is the same consistent edit done repeatedly by the recently (January) blocked editor User:TregRyder001. I believe an SPI is in order and I will go to that reporting page, but in the meantime, might page protection or a range block be in order? --Tenebrae (talk) 19:42, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 20:13, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistant vandalism attacks from IP-hopping vandal. I am also requesting page protection for Talmud, Halakha, and Shabbat as well, as they are also being targeted by the same vandal. . JudgeRM 20:24, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The others as well. Widr (talk) 20:27, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing, multiple vandalism editions and issues by unregistered and registered users.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 3:08, April 4, 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 20:32, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Anonymous IP addresses possibly related to the banned sock puppet User:Misterkimono continue to restore unreferenced and biased information without attempting to discuss the edits on the talk page. Suspected vandal edited the page again immediately after the previous lock was removed. As this has been going on for a long time period, can you please lock this article indefinitely? Thanks! JiminyCroquet (talk) 13:50, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 14:51, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – I have noticed that the page has seen an increasing number of cases of disruptive editing/vandalism from IP's or new users.. Therobinw (talk) 14:15, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 14:50, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by 208.122.82.254. . Peter Sam Fan 14:48, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 14:49, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Request for a permanent semi-protection on The 1989 World Tour page. Semi-protection expired, and it's bound for future edits by IPs who will mess up the like what happened in November 2015. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 13:34, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Protection expired some days ago...and not much vandalism since. Lectonar (talk) 13:37, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: An IP keeps removing a section of the article without explanation. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 13:36, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 13:38, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – To allow Template Editors. Mlpearc (open channel) 21:33, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

pinging @xaosflux Lectonar (talk) 12:11, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Not that it would matter, as this module is already full-protected by Main page cascade protection. — xaosflux Talk 13:25, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sock/meat puppetry (probably from 4chan again... see boards.4 *** chan.org/pol/thread/69767086) regarding the lead sentence again. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 00:21, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:58, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP edits are disruptive and unhelpful. JC · Talk · Contributions 00:47, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not every IP edit is vandalism, and this page seems well-watched and under control. Lectonar (talk) 12:02, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: If you look the number of disruptive edits of the last month, those are enough I believe to keep this page semi-protected. Ikhtiar H (talk) 05:52, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 12:03, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition of controversial content sourced only to unreliable sources. The article has been semiprotected before for the same reason. Probably it's one person using different IP's. Sjö (talk) 06:26, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only some attempts since last protection expired. Lectonar (talk) 12:04, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Indecision on the page title. JC · Talk · Contributions 21:08, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Seems to be clear now. Lectonar (talk) 11:42, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – I have noticed that the page has seen an increasing number of cases of disruptive editing/vandalism from IP's or new users. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 22:06, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:43, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brayan Jaimes (talk) 22:21, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:46, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

temporary protection: - edit warring and possible POV pushing going on.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:25, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined All reverts since March 27th have been done by autoconfirmed users; no need to fully protect. Lectonar (talk) 11:44, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – The move proposal was attempted; so was the name change. George Ho (talk) 23:07, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Seems stable now. Lectonar (talk) 11:51, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Article is the subject of many disputes and recently an edit war. Edit war was was resolved and stated that a certain editors edits must be first agreed upon in the talk page. Since then disputed edits have continued to endure without using talk page, with a user blocked for 24 but continuing to edit after that. The edits in question were from registered editors so semi-protection would not be appropriate. With full page protection, suggested edits could be written in the talk page and if found appropriate would be added to the article by a moderator or approved Wikipedia editor. The page does not require frequent edits so it won't be it won't be too restrictive to other users. F-16 Viper (talk) 22:22, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Seems to have died down..please relist if the problem persists. Sorry for the late reaction. Lectonar (talk) 11:27, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Conte was signed as the new coach of Chelsea F.C. today and will start next season, however still coaches the Italy national team until the Euro 2016 over the summer is complete. IPs are constantly adding incorrect info and will continue throughout the day if not protected. Thanks. Vaselineeeeeeee (talk) 13:56, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 14:50, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Harassment by banned LTA Nsmutte. GABHello! 15:02, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 15:04, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. MBlaze Lightning -talk! 11:52, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined For now; I have watchlisted and will fully protect if this gets worse. Lectonar (talk) 12:08, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. After some watching. Lectonar (talk) 12:53, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary template protection: Highly visible template – To allow Template Editors. Mlpearc (open channel) 21:32, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Lectonar (talk) 12:10, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: To make way for move from David gaz. Thanks. - MrX 01:27, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done I have moved the article. Lectonar (talk) 12:13, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Soon after protection expired. George Ho (talk) 23:10, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IPs used by WP:SITEBAN-ned editor User:Fangusu have been quite active on this page for the last few days. Steel1943 (talk) 23:44, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:58, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Edit-warring. Editors should discuss rather than insulting each other with edit summaries. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:27, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:00, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Edit warring Laber□T 03:55, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done See above, redundant request. Lectonar (talk) 12:03, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. clpo13(talk) 07:15, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:05, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated additions of the birthdays for completely non-notable people. Sjö (talk) 07:27, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:06, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:41, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:41, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Donnowin1 (talk) 22:33, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:50, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Page was just unprotected on April 2, but the disruptive editing hasn't really slowed down at all. ItsIzumi (talk) 23:17, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected again by Redrose64 after pagemove removed protection. tutterMouse (talk) 11:15, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, false claims of death. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:44, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Drmies for 1 month. tutterMouse (talk) 11:16, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Draft:zippcast has already been accepted, which created in ZippCast_(via_the_Article_Wizard). 333-blue 14:17, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I feel this draft is very poorly sourced, there's no WP:RS used, very little to satisfy WP:GNG and many of the refs link to ZippCast themselves, feels like it shouldn't have made it out of draftspace. tutterMouse (talk) 16:09, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I agree...but this can not be solved via protecting, as the draft has been accepted: Unprotected Lectonar (talk) 11:48, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems like attracting fans who want their own version of image to be seen. After some admin deletes the unused images in history, this image page should be protected for further uploads. Would save time of other editors and bots who have to keep coming and revert to smaller versions or request deletions of older versions. . §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:25, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done kelapstick(bainuu) 05:01, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Laber□T 04:36, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected and that should suffice. kelapstick(bainuu) 04:59, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring. George Ho (talk) 04:51, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done There is a discussion started, the solution George is just don't move the page until the discussion is complete. kelapstick(bainuu) 04:59, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.87.242.45.18 (talk) 07:51, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page has been deleted. Bishonen | talk 10:23, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
What was the article? tutterMouse (talk) 11:32, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. clpo13(talk) 19:18, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 19:39, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JC · Talk · Contributions 00:56, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. One day should be enough to let the article settle down. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:28, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. High visibility due to upcoming elections. Prone to edit wars.Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 04:26, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:38, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. High visibility due to upcoming elections. Prone to edit wars.Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 04:26, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:39, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. High visibility due to upcoming elections. Prone to edit wars.Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 04:26, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:39, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. High visibility due to upcoming elections. Prone to edit wars.Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 04:26, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:39, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. High visibility due to upcoming elections. Prone to edit wars.Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 04:26, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:40, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. High visibility due to upcoming elections. Prone to edit wars.Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 04:26, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:40, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. High visibility due to upcoming elections. Prone to edit wars.Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 04:26, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:41, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. High visibility due to upcoming elections. Prone to edit wars.Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 14:54, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:32, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Request temporary full protection due to ongoing edit-warring on the page. — Cirt (talk) 02:08, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, there is discussion at the talk page, and these two users are currently all over the place anyway.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:20, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 05:02, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, seems to have stopped, apologies for not reacting earlier--Ymblanter (talk) 18:23, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:Persistent vandalism by similar person in a different IPs. Molecule Extraction (talk) 16:56, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 18:20, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request temporary semi-protection as frequent target of trolling against women. — Cirt (talk) 17:46, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 18:20, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Abby Lee Miller (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 18:19, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection: Being a list of comparative value figures between top football clubs, this page is subject to constant edits by (over time) hundreds of unregistered users. Every idiot on the internet wants to come along and edit their own team in at the top of the current rankings and/or relegate their rivals. A page that should only be updated once a year ends up being subject to hundreds of edits in the same period. This needs permanent protection as the issue is never going to go away. Falastur2 Talk 23:11, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 18:19, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Edit-warring. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:28, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Seems to have ended for now. Widr (talk) 18:17, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. clpo13(talk) 23:36, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 18:16, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. High visibility due to upcoming elections. Prone to edit wars.Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 14:54, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:31, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. High visibility due to upcoming elections. Prone to edit wars.Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 14:54, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:31, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. High visibility due to upcoming elections. Prone to edit wars.Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 14:54, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:30, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. High visibility due to upcoming elections. Prone to edit wars.Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 14:54, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:29, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. High visibility due to upcoming elections. Prone to edit wars.Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 14:54, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:28, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. High visibility due to upcoming elections. Prone to edit wars.Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 14:54, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:28, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. High visibility due to upcoming elections. Prone to edit wars.Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 14:54, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:26, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. High visibility due to upcoming elections. Prone to edit wars.Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 14:57, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:25, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther :  Talk  02:57, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 18:12, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anom edits continue to remove or change the AfD templates. reddogsix (talk) 03:24, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Widr (talk) 18:11, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 3primetime3 (talk) 04:45, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 18:10, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistant vandalism. Music1201 talk 06:53, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 18:09, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of promotional, unsourced content. Unexplained removal of content (didn't like? competition?) This is a fairly constant problem with occasional spikes. Jim1138 (talk) 07:23, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 18:05, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 14:38, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 18:02, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: User request in own userspace. Mlpearc (open channel) 21:50, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected BethNaught (talk) 22:07, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: User request in own userspace. Mlpearc (open channel) 21:51, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected BethNaught (talk) 22:08, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: As the history shows there has been a frequency of disruptive editing by IP users targeted at section blanking. Requesting at least a week of protection. Inter&anthro (talk) 15:37, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 17:59, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP vandalism :/ Deku-shrub (talk) 15:59, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 17:59, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A number of different IPs and new accounts are targetting this article to remove sourced information about criticism against the article's subject. It has been going on for some time but has become more frequent recently. bonadea contributions talk 17:12, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 17:57, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request temporary semi-protection for vandalism, thank you admins !. — Cirt (talk) 17:13, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 17:56, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

05 April 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The article is a Good Article nominee for now and mostly IP edits and unexperienced users are constantly vandalising it. Diffs are presented here [13], [14], [15], [16] and [17]. Better requesting a good tenure of protection. SuperHero👊 10:04, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 10:21, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editors keep adding unreferenced speculation about upcoming draws. Qed237 (talk) 10:57, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:06, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request short term semiprotection (week) due to persistent issue-related vandalism. Wolbo (talk) 13:38, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by John Reaves for 3 days. tutterMouse (talk) 16:21, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Non-stop edit warring and reverts by involved editors. A temporary full protection is helpful, because they can solve their issues via talk page instead of endless edit warring. Zyma (talk) 03:11, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 09:34, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Mass changes made to FL-class article by IP-hopping user. Krimuk|90 (talk) 03:49, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The IP who made the edits on April 5th can be reported to AIV after appropriate warnings. Lectonar (talk) 09:34, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Requested due to continued reversions of the page by supporters of the defunct website who want to maintain an innaccurate and misleading description of the site without any supporting citations/references. MrMajors (talk) 09:10, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined That would keep anyone out who is trying to edit the page, you included. I would say this needs good sourcing, and, if it gets worse, dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 09:31, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 11:29, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:52, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism / edit warring. Niceguy149 (talkcontributionslogs) 23:23, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:22, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: A certain unregistered user has been adding unconfirmed and unsourced information. The user/s has been persistent in adding the same names and has been reverted several times already.MBdemigod (talk) 06:58, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:17, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Apparent misinformation from Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/The UPN Vandal. McGeddon (talk) 09:40, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Lectonar (talk) 09:49, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: A short-term protection measure for a couple of days that was put in place after persistent vandalism expired on 2 April 2016. Since then, regrettably there has been some further offensive vandalism to the article. A further short-term protection measure would therefore, I feel, be helpful after the recent death of this high-profile British man. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 00:28, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:37, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – About 2100 transclusions. 333-blue 00:31, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected Lectonar (talk) 09:36, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: Highly visible template – About 18400 transclusions. 333-blue 00:33, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected Lectonar (talk) 09:36, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: Highly visible template – About 5600 transclusions. 333-blue 00:41, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected Lectonar (talk) 09:36, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JC · Talk · Contributions 03:57, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:28, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Due to high media attention and a convoluted voting process for primaries, IP or novice users repeatedly change voting results or sources without paying attention to established consensus. This request aims at keeping the results table consistent and informative for readers and relieving good-faith editors of an unusual policing load. — JFG talk 07:38, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:29, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A member recently left the group, and there has been a lot of vandalism from IP editors since then. Random86 (talk) 09:16, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:27, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This was closed as merge in a AfD. An IP editor is repeatedly recreating the article. It was previously semi-protected because of this IP editor's disruptive edits. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:15, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:18, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This is a configuration page for my bot. -FASTILY 09:24, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Lectonar (talk) 09:26, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Page was salted back in 2007 due to high school kids' trolling. Perhaps a redirect to Perris Union High School District should do for now. Arbor to SJ (talk) 18:34, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

pinging@User:Jarry1250, the protecting admin. Lectonar (talk) 09:21, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done I have created the redirect. Lectonar (talk) 09:25, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – One of the main targets of the eternally-block-evading User:Cnslrken2. Pretty much every edit since 24 March has either been Cnslrken2, or the reverting of their nonsense. . AddWittyNameHere (talk) 22:33, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Yamaguchi先生 for 2 weeks. tutterMouse (talk) 05:38, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: High level of IPs and New created accounts user for vandalism. Modern Sciences (talk) 23:52, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: Since vandalism on this article is from IPs and New created accounts, I suggest this article be protected with Pending Changes Protection (Level 1). (not semi-protection because several IPs are making constructive edits; should be allowed to at least submit edits. And obviously not full protection.). Music1201 talk 03:28, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I concur; pending-changes should be enough to handle this for now. Lectonar (talk) 06:58, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It looks like quite the edit war by IPs and new accounts to place bogus content into this article. I am One of Many (talk) 06:18, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 06:51, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent persistent attempt to add non-notable person to article. If it's protected for a couple of weeks, hopefully the ip editor will desist. Onel5969 TT me 18:17, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 18:33, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – In one month there's been 27 revisions by 17 users and not a single constructive change ([18]). All were vandalism or non-constructive edits, most very insulting. Requesting semi-protection for a while. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 18:43, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Just report at AIV if necessary. Widr (talk) 18:45, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I came here to report the same page as there have been four (edit - now five) disruptive edits today alone. This page has been a continual target for vandals. Please re-consider? Perhaps permanent pending changes protection, as has been granted to Genderqueer (another perpetual vandalism target)? Funcrunch (talk) 22:14, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Agree Please protect this page, I have seen lots of vandalism at this page. Music1201 talk 00:06, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by dif IP abouth ethinity and no have any sources to their claims.--SaməkTalk 19:18, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 19:23, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

06 April 2016

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf (talk) 16:06, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I should add-might as well RPP Hamid Askari, yeah last time it was created was in December, but given the number of times it has been. Wgolf (talk) 16:25, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done both. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:51, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent Full Protection: Posting a request on behalf of Castlesierra (talk · contribs), who made a request at the Help Desk for this article to be locked down (here). They indicate that users and former employees are posting damaging information at the article, and that that information could harm the organization. A spate of vandalism last week resulted in a full protection, which expired this morning. There have been no further shenanigans since, but the previous bout was severe enough to require revisions to be deleted - direct accusations against living persons, legal threats, and so forth. Fun for everyone. I make no recommendation as such, and have invited Castlesierra to comment (and have ignored their username, for the moment). I understand that permanent full protection is a non-starter, but that is how the original request is phrased, and thus is the starting point for this request. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 16:44, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:31, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:49, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected BethNaught (talk) 19:51, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Renew pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Coffee, who initiated the protection a month ago, is inactive at the moment. I contacted the administrator for extension who upgraded the protection but then downgraded it. --George Ho (talk) 08:12, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Lectonar (talk) 08:26, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TJH2018 talk 18:36, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 18:39, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 19:11, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:18, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous disruptive editing and removal of sourced content by IP. 86.158.72.75 (talk) 18:12, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:12, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
How can three reverts within 5 days be "not enough recent disruptive activity"?[19][20][21] 31.49.133.154 (talk) 12:23, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Surely you are joking? Please read the protection policy if you have not done so already, and kindly have a look at the edit-history of WWE Women's Championship (2016–present), as an example . That is vandalism which warrants protection...because it is disruptive. Lectonar (talk) 12:27, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No not joking at all, are you saying that continously removing sourced content is not vandalism and/or disruptive editing? 31.49.133.154 (talk) 12:53, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not every vandalism leads to a page being protected...neither does every disruptive edit. Lectonar (talk) 12:56, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not every, no, but what about three by from multiple users? 31.49.133.154 (talk) 13:11, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: An IP is changing the lead to say Black Power is a "form of racism" without changing the reference which defines the concept as a "political slogan". The IP is either trolling or is pushing a white supremacy line. At any rate, there is edit warring without discussion. The page history shows not much activity, but I think all IP edits this year have been reverted. The last semi (diff) was for two weeks. Johnuniq (talk) 11:51, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. And I will watchlist, and if that becomes a pattern, will apply pending-changes protection. Lectonar (talk) 12:09, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous disruptive editing by IPs and anonymous users. 31.49.133.154 (talk) 17:52, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 18:17, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: User request in own userspace. Mlpearc (open channel) 17:58, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Widr (talk) 18:07, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 18:10, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 18:12, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection until the current IP (likely the same IP who was blocked earlier today for personal attacks) stops messing with it. A week or two should do it. Only in death does duty end (talk) 11:15, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 11:25, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: persistent level of IP vandalism. Richiekim (talk) 11:44, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:49, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User:Fangusu - still socking the same set of articles. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 15:34, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 15:47, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Fangusu is back again. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 15:35, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 15:46, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP socks of WP:SITEBAN-ned editor User:Fangusu have been editing this page quite frequently these past few days. Steel1943 (talk) 13:27, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 15:13, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent pending changes or semi-protection: Seven disruptive edits in less than 48 hours. Please review the logs of this page to see the ongoing pattern of vandalism. Requesting permanent protection, either pending changes (as has been granted to Genderqueer) or semi-protection. Funcrunch (talk) 13:49, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 15:12, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Article has been recreated 3 times in the past 90 minutes, last time as a complete copy of Groupon with the website named switched. Requesting page be WP:SALTed. . RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:06, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. Widr (talk) 15:11, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 15:06, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 15:09, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Recent controversial event with several edits of questionable neutrality. Tar-Elessar (talk) 00:41, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined While the article is of course heavily edited, I see no great disruption by IP editors. Please relist if vandalism picks up. Lectonar (talk) 08:20, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems to be a target to vandalism for whatever reason. Most recent bout went unnoticed for a couple months. The page has been protected before. Disallowing IPs and very new editors from editing this policy shortcut won't do any harm encyclopedia improvement wise. Godsy(TALKCONT) 02:03, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Persistent but very scarce. I have watchlisted. Lectonar (talk) 08:21, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Requesting indef semi on this redirect due to persistent C&P move attempts by dynamic IP. VQuakr (talk) 06:19, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:22, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Once again dynamic IP is removing content without explanation. Qed237 (talk) 13:27, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:06, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full-protection: Persistent edit-warring of 3,000+ characters of information. Page protection would encourage all parties to handle it out on the TP, rather than bring instability to the main space. Étienne Dolet (talk) 18:23, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I do see discussion on the talk-page. Lectonar (talk) 08:13, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism - repeated insertion of child-inappropriate shows (e.g. South Park, Skins) in nominees lists. Pattern of behaviour dating back several years, continues unabated. Bonusballs (talk) 20:07, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:07, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Brief semi: until the current lot stop messing with it. Philip Trueman (talk) 10:15, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:24, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Lengthy log. History of "anti-fascist" teenagers trying to eliminate their bogeyman by blanking our page on them '''tAD''' (talk) 20:38, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:19, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Semi-frequent vandalism including repeated efforts to add Scott Hunstad (A tournament player, based on google) to the history section as a creator. -- ferret (talk) 23:17, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:19, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Requesting longer (2 weeks?) semi-pro. Dynamic IP restarted disruption shortly after previous 3 day protection expired. VQuakr (talk) 06:21, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:23, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent BLP-violating vandalism. —Granger (talk · contribs) 07:17, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:25, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruption from a "new" account and an IP. zzz (talk) 14:53, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry but the above user is completely in the wrong a few months ago a sock user added random things to the article and repeated them in the lead which I removed I also added SOURCED information nothing of mine is vandalistic in nature. I have a strong suspicion that User Signedzzz is in cahoots the with the banned sock KahnJohn who originally added this material. Furthermore he has the nerve to ask me to discuss on talk page while his banned sock friend made no such attempts of mediation. R.Shukla.Mohan (talk) 15:09, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As for the ip its obviously some sort of troll whos made only one edit on the article that being adding a full stop and attacking another user. R.Shukla.Mohan (talk) 15:18, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please stop the sniping and bickering, and try to get more people on the talk-page to form consensus. Lectonar (talk) 08:06, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Donnowin1 (talk) 15:19, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:11, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. GABHello! 16:11, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 08:11, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Redirect is repeatedly being replaced with totally unsourced hoax article by different IPs from the same location. A search for sources ("Ben 10: Legends") turns up fan-fiction on Wikia and nothing else of relevance. . Grayfell (talk) 20:19, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:15, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I requested for this page to be protected and it was declined. However, since then, the high-level of vandalism has continued and is now resulting in addition of information that violates multiple Wikipedia policies, including verification and the happens of the television series itself. livelikemusic talk! 01:13, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:16, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Nairspecht (talk) 11:19, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:44, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – PP template. Will be added to the Lua module soon but needs protection for a while. QEDK (TC) 06:08, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:14, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. George Ho (talk) 07:34, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:42, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection or Semi-protection: Disruptive editing, multiple vandalism editions and issues by unregistered and some registered users.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 6:11, April 5, 2016 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. I'm seeing content disputes and incivility, not vandalism, and the edits look to me to be coming from established users. If another admin thinks this deserves full protection, be my guest, but semi won't solve the problems here. - CorbieV 23:29, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the information and help guy.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 6:50, April 5, 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EricEnfermero (Talk) 02:47, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Rather intense sudden spurt of Google Doodle related vandalism. Safiel (talk) 04:08, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:25, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Blatant IP vandalism. It's been going on for a couple days now. My suggestion is protecting this page for a couple weeks along with the USWNT article. – Michael (talk) 03:59, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:58, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. SSTflyer 15:09, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - CorbieV 23:10, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Obvious... TJH2018 talk 19:09, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Will probably need longer, or indef. But let's start with this. - CorbieV 22:57, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 20:41, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - CorbieV 23:03, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ongoing disruptive edits by IPs or new users going against consensus despite repeat warnings. ☾Loriendrew☽ (ring-ring) 11:44, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined IP seems to have stopped after last warning; please report to AIV if the IP comes back. Lectonar (talk) 14:11, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Dynamic IP repeatedly editing disruptively. Alexbrn (talk) 17:24, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 17:39, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Harassment by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Yourname. Asking for 1 month semi protection. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 22:31, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 22:38, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

07 April 2016

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Everymorning (talk) 15:20, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 16:05, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JumpiMaus (talk) 15:53, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 16:06, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jdcomix (talk) 16:19, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 16:25, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: due to persistent IP vandalism (see [22]). Quis separabit? 16:28, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 19:09, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The ref-desk troll has moved, might need protection back up again. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:57, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Was protected in between, now unprotected again. Lectonar (talk) 19:10, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: RD trolling. BasBibi (talk) 17:41, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Zzuuzz for 6 hours.tutterMouse (talk) 18:00, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Was Done but then wasn't... tutterMouse (talk) 18:54, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism from different IPs. CLCStudent (talk) 17:56, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - CorbieV 18:50, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. --Kansas Bear (talk) 18:45, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I was going to say take the IP editor to 3RR, but writing style indicates the multiple IPs are most likely the same individual. They're skirting 3RR, but as this pattern is drawn out over multiple days, upping the protection from past ones of several days to 1 week this time. If this persists, may need indef semi. - CorbieV 19:00, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Previous protection expired & the slow-motion edit war resumed. Previous protecting admin is unavailable. Bazj (talk) 11:54, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • It was previously semiprotected. Just want to comment that it should be either unprotected or fully protected, as the edit war is between good-faith IPs and registered users, and there seems to be no vandalism involved. —Kusma (t·c) 13:10, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 13:36, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ref-desk troll has returned immediately after the expiration of the previous page protection. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:40, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Future Perfect at Sunrise for 24 hours.tutterMouse (talk) 18:00, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping vandal has been constantly adding a non-warranted CSD tag to the page. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:23, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- zzuuzz (talk) 17:31, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of unsourced edits and speculation, together with some vandalism. 195.243.9.20 (talk) 11:13, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:46, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Give Your a Break 11:32, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 11:47, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Give Your a Break 11:32, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. See above. Lectonar (talk) 11:47, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from ever-changing IP addresses in Sarajevo. Semi-protected for 3 weeks in February for same reason. --T*U (talk) 14:15, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:33, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: (or pending changes) Two very recent accounts only editing this page, which I don't manage to get to the talk page to discuss their removal of content.... L.tak (talk) 19:35, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:20, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinated attack by multiple IPs. Vaginas everywhere. Can you block this content? And edits by IPs? 7&6=thirteen () 22:41, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not declining, but urging restraint. It seems to have stopped for the time being. Smalljim has been blocking, and I added one of the images to the bad image list. --Bongwarrior (talk) 22:50, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ooh, he's back. Just ask User:zzuuzz. --TJH2018 talk 23:00, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Where? The sandbox is still fine, and zzuuzz doesn't appear to be editing at the moment. --Bongwarrior (talk) 23:09, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, a group of us, including 7&6=thirteen, have dealt with this before. Nasty stuff, and it seems to have the same tendancies as a previous vandal. --TJH2018 talk 23:12, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Gotcha, my mistake. --Bongwarrior (talk) 23:13, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, he posted on one of my talk pages last night (before it was protected) that he had 1000s of IPs at his disposal and could not be blocked. This sick sociopath will be back. Trying I do think that if you could turn on page protection when it started (even for a couple of hours) it might frustrate him. You could turn it off without fanfare after he's gone. Extinction is the direction we need to implement. Just a thought. Needs to be REVDELd regularly when this occurs. Latest spate put lots of bad links into the edit summaries. Nasty business. 7&6=thirteen () 23:18, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Procedural; this is dealt with by other venues. Lectonar (talk) 10:24, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 06:56, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 08:52, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full-protection: Persistent editwaring – Continuous editwarring by numerous editors with little talk page activity. 31.49.133.154 (talk) 21:04, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 06:51, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Karst (talk) 22:58, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 06:51, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Renew pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Protecting administrator on vacation until tomorrow. However, the protection will end around midnight. Also, most of IP edits have been reverted. --George Ho (talk) 00:05, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 06:49, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – None of IP edits have been accepted lately. George Ho (talk) 00:15, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Widr (talk) 06:49, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 00:48, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 06:48, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – protected only recently. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 00:50, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 06:47, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing and IP vandalism. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 01:18, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 06:46, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – A T-Mobile IPV6 customer from Bellevue, Washington, US, who is effectively IP-shifting, is repeatedly adding an opinion essay to the article. A few weeks should help. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:26, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 06:44, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Expecting more with a recent MLB record set today. Request semi-protected status for the pages in question for 3 days. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ibarabi (talkcontribs) 21:27, 6 April 2016

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 06:53, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Favre1fan93 (talk) 05:17, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 06:40, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long-term disruption by Sicilian IPs. Binksternet (talk) 07:26, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 08:04, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: It's been semiprotected for two and a half years, long enough for the protecting admin to have retired except for removing notes from her talk page. Could we unprotect as a test, or at least downgrade it to pending changes? At worst, the persistent vandalism will resume and make someone unprotect it, or if it doesn't resume, the unprotection will have helped. 66.213.111.239 (talk) 17:51, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – The protection log is a mile long. Doesn't seem much chance of success, and there is hardly any upside. EdJohnston (talk) 04:55, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 05:00, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 06:59, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Favre1fan93 (talk) 05:18, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 06:58, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Cnslrken2. Binksternet (talk) 05:28, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 06:58, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Cnslrken2. Binksternet (talk) 05:28, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 06:57, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:15, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Drmies. Widr (talk) 06:45, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:4901:2191:99AA:D674:A7EA:CCA5 (talk) 03:16, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Gilliam. Widr (talk) 06:44, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition of unsourced original research, NPOV-violating editorialising by IP editors. Ryk72 'c.s.n.s.' 04:38, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 06:41, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This page was the subject of a protracted edit war, which resulted in both editors involved being blocked indefinitely. One of the two is now editing while logged out to bypass their block, mostly to edit this page. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:33, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Mike V for 1 month. tutterMouse (talk) 06:17, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: User request. TJH2018 talk 03:42, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Widr (talk) 06:31, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Creation protection needed. Has been recreated multiple times today.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 05:46, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected kelapstick(bainuu) 05:58, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Renew pending changes: Persistent vandalism – None of IP edits have been accepted. --George Ho (talk) 00:28, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 1 year. There was PC1 in place but it was about to expire. EdJohnston (talk) 05:13, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism from IPs. Grammarxxx (What'd I do this time?) 04:41, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 1 month. EdJohnston (talk) 05:06, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Grammarxxx (What'd I do this time?) 04:43, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 1 month. EdJohnston (talk) 04:52, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 22:02, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. MusikAnimal talk 22:18, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Andy W. (talk · contrib) 01:54, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 02:00, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: remove the protection not the extended confirmed users. --BasBibi (talk) 14:09, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you want the protection to be lifted? Lectonar (talk) 14:13, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected in view of recent edit history. Favonian (talk) 17:38, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: This redirect is linked in functions of Special:ListUsers. (For reference, please see Wikipedia:MOVP, a similar redirect that was fully protected indefinitely since it is used in a "MediaWiki:" page. Since all "Special:" pages are system functions, changes to this redirect could break a system function, which, in this case, is directing users to the right place when clicking blue "extended confirmed user" links that appear at Special:ListUsers in searches.) Steel1943 (talk) 14:54, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Katietalk 23:47, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 22:19, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 23:43, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: I had a user edit this log, have no interest with users editing my logs... TJH2018 talk 22:55, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is semiprotection ok? If it's fully protected, you won't be able to use it either. --Bongwarrior (talk) 23:03, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, go figure. *Fish slap*...Yeah, that would be great. Thanks!--TJH2018 talk 23:04, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done --Bongwarrior (talk) 23:11, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

IP vandalizing several automotive pages

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. A series of IP addresses have been edit warring with regards to the term "pickup" in at least 4 auto related articles. The IP address has been engaged via the Project Automobile talk page[23] and asked to stop. The IP editor has not only continued to edit the pages against consensus but also vandalized a template page [24]. Request semi-protected status for the pages in question for 3 months. Springee (talk) 20:09, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 22:17, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by new users. . Peter Sam Fan 20:26, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 21:06, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Apparently, an Internet meme of this frog with a caption "It is Wednesday my dudes" is directing a lot of users to vandalize this article. — Andy W. (talk · contrib) 21:09, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 21:12, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

08 April 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Getting a lot of IP inserts/vandalism over "Shanta Ronaldo", who seems unlikely to be actually playing for this club. McGeddon (talk) 22:46, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 07:17, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Lectonar: There is no "user" - it's a dozen different IP addresses and SPAs adding Ronaldo to random positions, calling him a paedophile, making cancer jokes, etc. --McGeddon (talk) 08:31, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@McGeddon: You're correct. These IP6's are sometimes difficult to tell apart. Semi-protected for a period of X, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:23, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Fresh a/c continually NNPOV pecking at lede . Alexbrn (talk) 08:16, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Just one new user, so page protection would be a little heavy-handed; please engage her/him by using talk-pages (I know you left the welcome-template); not everybody is used to communication by edit-summaries. Lectonar (talk) 08:22, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 16:38, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Bongwarrior for 2 weeks. tutterMouse (talk) 19:34, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: There is always going to be a high level of IP vandalism owing to the Old Firm derby. This will likely will get worse towards the cup semi in the middle of the month. It has only got off protection and it has started again so I request perminant semi-protection The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 22:05, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Lectonar (talk) 07:16, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Lectonar: I'm not asking it to be semi-proed pre-emptively, I'm asking based on the history of vandalism that has started again. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 07:43, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@The C of E: There is not much vandalism (yet), so I just took your "...This will likely will get worse..." and acted on that. So, for the time being Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:47, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – No need to be edited, all recent edits are vandalism/reverts thereof. Everymorning (talk) 03:47, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Last edit in 2015. Lectonar (talk) 07:33, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Highly visible page – One renaming was attempted. Also, that caused protecting settings to shift, re-allowing IPs to harm the article again. It's on the Main Page right now. George Ho (talk) 07:45, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: With the semi-protection comes move-protection of the same level which is already in place. Lectonar (talk) 07:52, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor. George Ho (talk) 08:03, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 00:21, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Seems to have died down; please relist if it picks up. Lectonar (talk) 07:20, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 00:48, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 07:18, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP disruption - has been falsifying infobox & lede figures/text - dodging conversation [26]. Soupforone (talk) 02:20, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 07:21, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. NZunknown (talk) 03:17, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 07:21, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – The request I made yesterday was rejected, but IPV6 anon from Belleview made the same edit today so I'm requesting again today and will continue to ask every time the anon makes the change. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:19, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It would perhaps be adequate to play whack-a-mole with the IP for some time, so I'd say report the IP/IP's to AIV. Lectonar (talk) 07:29, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: multiple disruptive editions, this Wikipedia page suffers of a lot of vandalism and issues by unregistered and registered users, so I am looking forward and asking for an indefinite and full template protection. Thanks.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 4:33, April 7, 2016 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:15, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – This page gets vandalized when the protection expires. Mar11 (talk) 07:19, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:27, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Azealia911 talk 22:40, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:17, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 00:52, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:19, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sixth of March 05:42, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Lectonar (talk) 07:22, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – 116.202.38.21 is using Mailmeaf and Vikura63 to season the article with unnecessary capital letters. GABHello! 22:11, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Ponyo for 48 hours. tutterMouse (talk) 05:42, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. GABHello! 22:34, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Ponyo for 48 hours. tutterMouse (talk) 05:42, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. clpo13(talk) 05:29, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:38, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. clpo13(talk) 05:38, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Bongwarrior as above. tutterMouse (talk) 05:43, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 50.254.179.37 (talk) 19:14, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. I see a content dispute. I will reconsider if you can show diffs that are vandalism. Otherwise, do not report content disputes as "vandalism." By the way, if the page were to be semi-ed, you wouldn't be able to edit it, either; that is, unless you are currently editing logged-out in order to avoid disclosing your named account. - CorbieV 20:39, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – In the past hour or so there's been a spate of variant titles (@ShantaRonaldo‎, Shanta Ronaldo (Nonce)) from various IPs, and a lot of BLP abuse, so should protect the primary against recreation. McGeddon (talk) 22:56, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected all three kelapstick(bainuu) 04:08, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – More User:Fangusu IP socking. Steel1943 (talk) 01:52, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. v/r - TP 01:58, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CommonsDelinker User and Talk pages

Permanent fully protection: Since this page was updated to inform properly its tasks (removing links to files deleted at Commons), several user left messages to the bot talk page (and also the User page was vandalized), then, reverted by Denniss, Me, and others. As this user is a bot, leaving messages does not make sense, and the Talk Page redirects to the User page, therefore, I suggest the fully protection to all these pages in order to avoid editing the informative message about the bot (as well the vandalism). Amitie 10g (talk) 17:28, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done More or less procedural; this has been sitting here for more than 24 hours now. I would not have protected because the frequency is far too low, and my esteemed colleagues seem to agree somewhat by not protecting either. I have watchlisted all threee. Lectonar (talk) 18:58, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: 400+ transclusions. George Ho (talk) 05:41, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. When high risk template protection was implemented back around 2010, 500 transclusions were considered high-risk, and as far as I can remember vandalism had to haven taken place. I would set the number of transclusions needed to consider this high risk considerably higher now, as Wikipedia has grown quite a bit. The template was indeed vandalised once as far as I can see. If one of my colleagues wants to protect, I would not mind. Lectonar (talk) 19:07, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Due to a high level of media attention, conflicting reports on delegate counts from various sources and — shall we say — over-enthusiastic partisanship, the delegate count gets changed multiple times per day without regard to counting process, page history and previously-established consensus. This situation is particularly cumbersome for good-faith editors to constantly check, police and educate. Most of the disruptive changes are applied by IP or new accounts, so semi-protection during the rest of the election cycle looks like the best strategy. It worked wonders for the same situation on the Democratic side. — JFG talk 20:56, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. At least now I can be considered really neutral as I protected both pages.... Lectonar (talk) 21:22, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism with obscene images. Please help. — Andy W. (talk · contrib) 22:57, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Bongwarrior (talk) 23:12, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – obscene images by IP. Please help. — Andy W. (talk · contrib) 23:00, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Bongwarrior (talk) 23:12, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

09 April 2016

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced spoilers by IP addresses. Would be ideal if page is protected until the beginning of June, when the season will likely finish airing. Linguist 111talk 15:00, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ruslik_Zero 20:09, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Unregistered users started adding random cast members since the protection template was removed. Vandals and additional cast and characters who are not part of the show has been consistently added and been reverted several times.MBdemigod (talk) 15:25, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ruslik_Zero 20:06, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long Term Abuse of TV5Ozamiz. LG-Gunther :  Talk  02:21, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. You should probably report User: Haveyouseenthisboy. Ruslik_Zero 20:04, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Philip J Fry Talk 20:02, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:14, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Tendentious editing of statistics against consensus by IP/new editors. Template:Republican Party presidential primaries, 2016 was semi-protected recently for the same reason, but the disruption continues at the main article. —Nizolan (talk) 21:02, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ruslik_Zero 19:50, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. GABHello! 22:10, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ruslik_Zero 19:53, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: as per WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. 31.49.133.154 (talk) 19:02, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done, 500/30 indefinitely protected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:43, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent strange edits with no edit summaries.VictoriaGraysonTalk 19:33, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Many of the IP edits aren't that strange. Yaris678 (talk) 09:31, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent block evasion. Amaury (talk) 02:13, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:36, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Unsourced and incorrect edits with no edit summaries.VictoriaGraysonTalk 04:02, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:32, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: IP users keep vandalizing this page--not enough for semi-protection, but disruptive none-the-less. Peter Sam Fan 15:02, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Standard practice!  —SMALLJIM  15:13, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion by IP

Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive editing and block evasion by Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Best known for IP. clpo13(talk) 05:19, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

if you want articles to comply with the fundamental policies of Wikipedia, them you should dismiss this frivolous and dishonest request.82.132.217.98 (talk) 05:32, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Do you deny that you're the same person as 82.132.221.143 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) and 82.132.224.82 (talk · contribs · WHOIS)? It looks like plain, old-fashioned block evasion to me. clpo13(talk) 05:35, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
82.132.217.98 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) was blocked and the same disruptive behavior on these pages is continuing as 82.132.223.69 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). clpo13(talk) 22:02, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Range block. Yaris678 (talk) 09:02, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Also semi-protected for 2 weeks except for the talk page.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:06, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition of unsourced material by IP address; I've tried inviting this editor to discuss on the talk page, to no avail. . Nomoskedasticity (talk) 14:55, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:09, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP disruption. Volunteer Marek (talk) 06:25, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, just one IP. I warned them, if they return and continue reverting, go straight to 3RRN or AIV.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:13, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As all other pages related to dawoodi bohras are protected even this new page should be protected as there is an ongoing succession controversy which causes partisan edits by unknown IP addresses. Summichum (talk) 08:45, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:58, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 15:42, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:45, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 16:36, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:46, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by user with varying IP addresses. VG31-irl 16:47, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:48, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Rapid vandalism, suspecting probable consistent vandalism today. Jdcomix (talk) 16:49, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:49, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jdcomix (talk) 16:51, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:50, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

America's Next Top Model seasons' individual articles

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Linguist 111talk 18:23, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:54, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: A number of IP addresses began to target this article and make a lot of nonsense edits especially at the player's bio section. -WayKurat (talk) 18:25, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:55, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 18:26, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:56, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 18:27, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:57, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated disruptive editing by IPs. Violating BLP. Also using some bad words in local language. . Human3015 TALK  20:43, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:58, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. clpo13(talk) 22:01, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:44, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – most vandalism here is commited by unregistered users, the page has been protected a few times but the vandalism continues. TheDasherLegendXD 23:41, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Try a little shorter first. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:42, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. clpo13(talk) 23:46, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:42, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. clpo13(talk) 23:51, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:41, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent disruptive editing. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 00:18, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:38, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. LG-Gunther :  Talk  02:23, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:35, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} 03:15, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:34, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Requesting indef semi on this page as the Maria Ozawa-related BLPvios continue to persist even after a month since the page was protected. Blake Gripling (talk) 10:57, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:11, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated POV edits by IPs (probably all the same editor) not permitted to edit here under WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. RolandR (talk) 11:44, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:18, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP hopping vandal. --OpenFuture (talk) 12:59, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.Euryalus (talk) 11:25, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. A wave of IP editors (186.214.109.194; 93.221.243.65; 180.244.47.144; 177.133.174.67; 93.221.213.89; 84.183.99.216; 199.185.67.239; 84.183.97.124; 84.139.123.154; 84.139.114.106; 219.89.19.22; 84.139.119.116; 93.221.204.79; 2a02:810c:c3f:ee8c:1cfb:a546:96e2:620c; 2a02:810c:c3f:ee8c:2459:9243:ea3c:eb44; 93.221.212.101; 84.183.105.126; 84.139.121.203; 2a02:810c:c3f:ee8c:d8a:c05f:c18:4c5a; 93.221.254.77; 2003:87:4d20:bfd1:3593:3a9b:aca:cf9; 84.183.121.195; 93.221.198.104; 84.183.101.248; 2a02:810c:c3f:ee8c:8c6a:9edb:58ab:bbe6; 84.183.117.115; 93.221.236.107; 2003:74:cc2c:5f00:c860:9be0:1a2a:9a56; 93.221.250.40) has kept emerging and making the same controversial edits over and over again. This is now the third page protection request (earlier ones here: [27][28], both accepted), so perhaps a bit longer protection period could be tried? The vandalism has started already in January 10. Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 19:35, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:21, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Fundamental WP:BLP violations by IPs. Plot Spoiler (talk) 20:55, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:24, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP source vandalism. Escape Orbit (Talk) 10:12, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:28, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unexplained removal from several IPs. Qed237 (talk) 11:04, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:27, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Usual Indian film post-release situation. Nairspecht (talk) 08:57, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:19, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Almost all recent edits are vandalism or reverts. Everymorning (talk) 04:56, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 09:16, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Renew pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Reverts have been happening lately. Protection close to expiration; administrator no longer active. --George Ho (talk) 06:27, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:12, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant disruptive edits and vandalism. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 07:02, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:11, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. —Largo Plazo (talk) 19:45, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Cryptic for 1 year. tutterMouse (talk) 05:07, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same trolling as recently . Andy Dingley (talk) 21:14, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Bilby for 2 weeks. tutterMouse (talk) 05:08, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-vandalism, for article under WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. Huldra (talk) 01:11, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 01:15, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-vandalism, for article under WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. Huldra (talk) 01:11, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 01:14, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

10 April 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This person died tonight and IP's are wrecking havoc on the page. Please protect for a couple of days until details are released. Rockchalk717 06:05, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The request made sense at the time, but since then the vandalism has stopped and IPs have made a number of good edits. Yaris678 (talk) 12:31, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Adding largely unsourced contents by IPs. Need protection for atleast 2 months. Charles Turing (talk) 14:11, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 18:57, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Current event/political dispute, several unregistered IPs changing country ownership issue to reflect their POV of the issue. JamesG5 (talk) 15:51, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator EdJohnston. Katietalk 18:54, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – disruptive editing. Opdire657 (talk) 15:35, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 14:42, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing. Opdire657 (talk) 16:44, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 14:42, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing. Opdire657 (talk) 16:45, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 14:43, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. clpo13(talk) 17:32, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 14:44, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Several instances of BLP violations of this article in the last couple of days as well as garden variety vandalism. Article is currently subject to discretionary sanctions under an ARB COM ruling, but I think at least a short term temporary semi-protect is needed at this point. Safiel (talk) 17:38, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Start with a short one, I'll keep an eye on it in case a longer protection is needed. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 14:49, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, WP:BLP violations by IP hopping vandal. 2601:188:0:ABE6:60FC:44F0:F227:C4AF (talk) 02:35, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 14:51, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Same IP editor has been vandalizing WP:AEI page [29]. Editor has also vandalized the project automobile talk page thus a request for protection there. A previous request was made and granted on April 6th. Springee (talk) 13:46, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

IP editor in action again: Two IP's in action again, [30], [31] Springee (talk) 00:13, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done Most of the pages have been semied and the IPs concerned have been blocked or range blocked, by various admins. Yaris678 (talk) 12:03, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Renew pending changes: Despite infrequent editing, only one IP edit was accepted, while the rest have been reverted. --George Ho (talk) 09:52, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I'd like to get MusikAnimal's opinion first Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:29, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I contacted him first; he hasn't responded yet. --George Ho (talk) 11:34, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I added PC in response to a long-term vandal across the number pages. I don't think the recent disruption is related, but PC may still be appropriate MusikAnimal talk 16:26, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 (talk) 12:17, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism after protection expired. Krimuk|90 (talk) 09:34, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for 1 year by Materialscientist. BethNaught (talk) 12:59, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – An edit-war has been ongoing here for a couple of days now. The participants are talking, but intersperse their discussion with reverts, which is unhelpful. Three days or so of full protection should take care of it. . Vanamonde93 (talk) 15:29, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Ruslik_Zero 19:45, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pages protected by Coffee (admin)

Renew pending changes: Although editing is infrequent in each page, almost none of IP edits have been accepted, especially yesterday. --George Ho (talk) 09:47, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question: George Ho have you already asked Coffee? Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:31, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Coffee's not active at the moment for nearly two weeks. I don't think that would be necessary. George Ho (talk) 11:33, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP edits- suspected sock puppets, some vandalism. Josslined (talk) 15:23, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by EdJohnston for 2 months. tutterMouse (talk) 06:24, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism. wiki tamil 100 13:30, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Not done Why did you make this report? Page history shows you are the only person who has edited your page. Are you accusing yourself of vandalism or am I missing something here? - CorbieV 22:46, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive editing. LG-Gunther :  Talk  13:53, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The IP has been blocked. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 22:56, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated edits from IPs adding "iOS 10" two places in the article. iOS 10 hasn't been announced by Apple yet, and there is no existing iOS 10 page on Wikipedia. Several people, including myself, have tried to nicely write in undo revisions that iOS 10 shouldn't be added to the article yet, but IP users ignore us and keep re-adding the info. LocalNet (talk) 16:24, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator CorbieVreccan. Katietalk 02:36, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: as per WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. 31.49.133.154 (talk) 18:47, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator BethNaught. Katietalk 02:35, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:10, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. They can go to AfC or similar. Other admins, feel free to reduce the level if you think this should be created in the foreseeable future. Oh, never mind; I just realized the title has incorrect grammar. - CorbieV 22:39, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs repeatedly causing disruption. Appears to be because of the 2016 Armenian–Azerbaijani clashes that happened a couple of days ago. Étienne Dolet (talk) 20:50, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 02:30, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism for about a month now. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 22:16, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 02:25, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MYS77 22:29, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 02:21, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. clpo13(talk) 22:54, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Malcolmxi5. Katietalk 02:17, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Automotive IP user. Disruptive IP editor edit warring over "pick-up truck" vs. "utility truck". Previously disrupted other truck articles (#IP vandalism related to automotive topics again) clpo13(talk) 22:57, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Malcolmxl5. Katietalk 02:18, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – An IP editor has been persistently adding information presumably based on WP:CRYSTALBALL, certainly not backed by any reliable sources I can find (and I searched!). Editor is not responding to either talk page or reversion comments. We need some way to get his attention. At this point, it seems he is making the edits daily. Tarl.Neustaedter (talk) 13:18, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, seem to have stopped after warning. If they return under the same IP, go straight to WP:3RRN--Ymblanter (talk) 20:08, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. clpo13(talk) 23:08, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Ruslik_Zero 19:55, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. clpo13(talk) 01:06, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Ruslik_Zero 19:57, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism by IPs and new users. 61.3.106.101 (talk) 12:20, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, seems to have stopped, apologies for not reacting on time--Ymblanter (talk) 19:44, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of persistent IP vandalism. Hridith Sudev Nambiar (talk) 18:07, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ruslik_Zero 19:46, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Classifies among very dumb revert wars. I revert a wrong sentence ("from sparser to richer support") whose opposite is correct. And now a group of IP users (related?) have started a revert war. A mildly nasty comment was also placed in the talk page calling me a "hater".[32]. Codename Lisa (talk) 13:51, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 22:55, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. clpo13(talk) 21:43, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - CorbieV 22:42, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multi-day vandalism from several IPs. -- ferret (talk) 13:57, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 22:24, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – And twice this morning, but it's still probably not frequent enough. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:22, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:32, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Non-automated comment: that it was requested twice and denied twice is not the issue, it's that it should be protected because an IP-hopping anon continues to add unsourced content to the page and all efforts to discuss the issue with the anon have failed to engage the editor in discussion and it is hoped that protecting the page will be a step toward that. Six edits in the last twelve hours should be enough to be considered enough. 208.81.212.224 (talk) 17:43, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 22:25, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:38, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 22:27, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruption from editor with IP addresses in 178.208.160.0/20, adding criticism without proper sources. I've reduced it to a stub, as the article was originally too promotional and better sources are needed, but these IPs keep reverting. Peter James (talk) 11:34, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 22:29, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Page is a re-direct which was protected previously due to IP-hopping editor persistently attempting to restore it. Protection expired and IP attempted to restore again. Eagleash (talk) 12:12, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 22:31, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-vandalism, for article under WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. . Huldra (talk) 13:03, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Huldra:, I think WP:30/500 protection would be better so that only extended confirmed users can edit it. It's an ARBPIA problem and this protection is now available. The ARBPIA3#500/30 rule will be enforced either way, by people or by the server, so let the server do it. Sean.hoyland - talk 16:08, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Sean.hoyland:, yeah, you are probably right. With the recent shenanigans at Bethlehem, a WP:30/500 protection would be better. Huldra (talk) 16:50, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done For one week at first. Lectonar (talk) 21:47, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

11 April 2016

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There seems to be one editor against four in this content dispute. I didn't make the edit but I tried a couple reverts to no avail. With the fact the recent drug issue with Sharapova has caused blood levels to rise (and she won't be playing anytime soon so no worries about keeping the article up to date) I was hoping for a week protection to see if we can come up with any compromises on the talk page. Fyunck(click) (talk) 05:44, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Seems to have died down. Use the talk-page and try to hammer out consensus. Lectonar (talk) 08:14, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Just use the pending changes level 2 with semi-protection, which is simpler. 333-blue 13:18, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
We do not use PC2 - see WP:PCRFC. Katietalk 16:52, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.CLCStudent (talk) 14:47, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Only one IP was vandalizing the page, and he has been blocked. Peter Sam Fan 16:08, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Katietalk 16:42, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Looking for consensus here: Birth place. Mlpearc (open channel) 16:14, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Not there yet. If an edit war breaks out, WP:AN3 is thataway. :-) Katietalk 16:46, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. As seen here [33][34][35][36][37][38] IP editors are constantly removing sourced information and its sources, or writing in information that is not in the cited sources. Several editors have been reverting them like here [39][40][41][42] (note - one editor also writing in the edit summary a need for page protection). EkoGraf (talk) 19:02, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 20:47, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Expire pending changes, duplicated protections. 333-blue 12:45, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm...more redundant than duplicated: the semi-protection is temporary, and expires in March 2017, whereas the pending changes protection is infinite. If semi-protection expires, pending changes "takes over". Lectonar (talk) 12:52, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined per Lectonar. PC and semi-protection are entirely different animals, and neither affects autoconfirmed accounts. Katietalk 16:39, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. A wave of IP editors (93.221.253.114; 84.139.125.10; 84.139.120.115; 93.221.203.172; 84.183.120.126; 2a02:810c:c3f:ee8c:ec76:9c72:7356:4fc8; 179.195.110.45; 93.221.212.164; 93.221.233.138; 93.221.252.112; 84.139.115.190; ) has kept emerging and vandalizing the article Talk Page. This emerged after the one month long article page protection that was implemented two days ago[43]. The article Talk Page has been protected already one time earlier.[44] Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 16:29, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 18:25, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – More Ted Cruz stuff today. Tired of dealing with it. Shearonink (talk) 18:34, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:41, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant target for casting hoaxes. See User:NinjaRobotPirate/Animation hoaxer#Copycat for details. All of the recent edits have been reverting vandalism by this hoaxer. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:06, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:59, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pages protected by Coffee (admin) redux

Renew pending changes: Pinging Coffee this time; however, the administrator is inactive at the moment. Meanwhile, there have been reverts. The previous request was unfairly archived without reject or approval. George Ho (talk) 19:07, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Archiving is done by a bot, so unfairly....isn't strictly true. Nobody acted on your request, that's all. Lectonar (talk) 08:22, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection for article and Talk page say for 1 month. We are beset be some religious person at an IP address who is upset with the historical presentation of a document relevant to ancient near eastern history. Jytdog (talk) 10:10, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 11:09, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP-hopping user has been persistently changing information without sourcing it. -©2016 Compassionate727(Talk)(Contributions) 12:22, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 16:49, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: relentless partisan vandalism (see [45]). Quis separabit? 22:56, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Semi-protection would not cut it, as there are confirmed users involved. Lectonar (talk) 08:37, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – long-term vandalism by IP hopping vandal. 31.49.133.154 (talk) 23:19, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:37, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: VERY high level of IP vandalism. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 01:33, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Essentially one IP. Lectonar (talk) 08:38, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. 2679D (talk) 03:01, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:40, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. 2679D (talk) 03:01, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. In the whole page history there is just ONE IP edit. Please read the protection policy if you have not done so already. Lectonar (talk) 08:41, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. 2679D (talk) 03:02, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:42, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – This page is part of the succession controversy ,which is ongoing as other pages are protected this too should be protected. Summichum (talk) 05:13, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:44, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Constant vandalism all the time by non-registered users - LionsRule125 (talk) 05:54, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I wouldn't call this "constant"...and not every IP-edit is vandalism. Lectonar (talk) 08:44, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Constant vandalism all the time by non-registered users - LionsRule125 (talk) 05:54, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. See above. Lectonar (talk) 08:44, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism – IP-vandalism, for article under WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. Huldra (talk) 05:59, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. This is essentially the 122.xxx IP. Lectonar (talk) 08:46, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism – IP-vandalism, for article under WP:ARBPIA3#500/30 . Huldra (talk) 06:00, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. This is essentially the 122.xxx IP. Lectonar (talk) 08:47, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism – IP-vandalism, for article under WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. Huldra (talk) 06:00, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. This is essentially the 122.xxx IP. Lectonar (talk) 08:47, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. LG-Gunther :  Talk  06:33, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 08:49, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unresponsive IP persistently adding nonsensical non-notable trivia despite numerous reversions by multiple editors and multiple requests, warnings and explanations on his talkpage. Editor has been reported to AIV but the page is backlogged. AussieLegend () 19:38, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 08:23, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs have been constantly changing the episodes to incorrect info, Although I've only been reverted twice the IPs will constantly revert until the page is protected, I'm not sure on the indef part so I'll leave that up to the admin, Thanks,. –Davey2010Talk 20:12, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:23, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors are changing data to deliberately false values. Examples: casting (source), distributor (source), soundtrack (source). NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:34, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 08:31, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection or Indefinite semi-protection: Fake pornographic pictures have been posted as well as other vandalism. Please protect in some manner to make it harder for this to happen. Thanks.Bobsanders1991 (talk) 20:48, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:32, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – This page is constantly edited by IPs, which add content without citing to reliable source(s), and also violate BLP policy. Mona778 (talk) 21:01, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. The IPs are not really the problem here Lectonar (talk) 08:33, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Multiple IP #REDIRECT reverts from January 2016 with no improvements to the article.   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  22:01, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Article is already move-protected, though.Lectonar (talk) 08:34, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The subject of this page has been the topic of some debate recently, and IP users have begun vandalising the page. I request short-term semi-protection, at least until the AfD debate is sorted out. Smith(talk) 22:29, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Not htat much IP-vandalism. Let's see how the AfD goes. Lectonar (talk) 08:11, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: High level of edit warring and white washing occurring on talk pages. A group of users are removing talk page topics potentially due to conflict of interest even though cited articles state sexual abuse allegations of Pramukhswami who is a famous guru with thousands of centers throughout the globe. This was discussed when the allegations became public and it was decided that two former members accusing the swami of rape and abuse was not important to include because of said reasons on talk page even though the group, BAPS, acknowledged the allegations and denied any wrongdoing. Alleged members of the sect on wikipedia have become obsessed with removing this archived discussion. Swamiblue (talk) 04:21, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Assuming you want the talk-page protected. That is what talk-pages are for....finding consensus. Lectonar (talk) 08:13, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Persistent vandalism. --93.185.30.47 (talk) 06:59, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:14, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content, and neutrality violations. Opencooper (talk) 07:25, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:15, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.Dan56 (talk) 17:12, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 08:19, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user is out of town, and his page is being regularly defaced. 7&6=thirteen () 18:18, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined has been dealt with... Lectonar (talk) 08:18, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Obscure 90s TV show getting practically no edits that aren't Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/Maelbros vandalism. McGeddon (talk) 09:49, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:08, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – I redirected this article and then an IP user reverted it. This change was reverted but I this was reverted. Can we get some protection so that IP users can't keep undoing the redir. I believe that the redir is best for this article which is a fork from the episode guide. Gbawden (talk) 11:49, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:19, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Self-made request on my own userspace. No need for other IPs to edit my userpage whatsoever. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 08:57, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Lectonar (talk) 09:31, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Since the previous semi-protection has expired, the vandalism has started again. —Granger (talk · contribs) 09:20, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:32, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Surprised this isn't indefinitely protected already, if you look at the history it's full of vandalism. Has been protected and set on pending changes in the past, but always temporary. — Omni Flames (talk contribs) 10:15, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I am really reticent to protect anything indefinitely as there have been long periods without protection where it hasn't been too bad. I agree with long-term protection though. If it gets this bad again after a year I think indef would be appropriate. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 10:47, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing (edit warring, and personal attacks in edit summaries) from IP editors. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 23:08, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:35, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unofficial free agent signing information repeatedly being added. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 23:29, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:38, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Rampant editing tests by IPs. Protection for a reasonable time shall be appreciated. . Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:30, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:39, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism over an extended period. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:38, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:40, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism / Persistent addition(s) of unsourced or poorly sourced content. 2601:1C0:4901:2191:BD3E:CF37:B84E:8672 (talk) 03:55, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:42, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced and untrue content. I can't find anything at all indicating that what this IP is implementing into the article is even true. After further searching, I can now confirm this is complete hogwash. See page history. —DangerousJXD (talk) 04:04, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:43, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent addition of Hoaxes of User:TV5Ozamiz Sock. LG-Gunther :  Talk  06:32, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:48, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 07:27, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:49, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and Persistent vandalism.Donnowin1 (talk) 08:24, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 08:50, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Everybody and their uncle is throwing info into the article that isn't referenced and has WP:NPOV issues. Vjmlhds 12:46, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:08, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 2602:306:3357:BA0:E593:9671:5C8D:1A40 (talk) 20:07, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:09, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 07:39, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 08:15, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: – Increasingly high level of IP vandalism and disruptive editing, as he has just won a major world title in the past 24 hours. A few days of SPP ought to fend 'em off. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 08:43, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:16, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP insisting on his edit and refusing to discuss. JorisvS (talk) 10:10, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I have just warned the IP. If this continues, we should block that IP. If the new IPs are used we should consider range block or semi-protection. Yaris678 (talk) 12:57, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Katietalk 18:56, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Long term persistent copyright violations, even after users have been warned against this in edit summaries. DarkKnight2149 18:57, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 19:10, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Mass vandalism. WannaBeEditor (talk) 23:13, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting pretty ridiculous. Appears to be a coordinated strike to me, between the flood of simultaneously-vandalizing rednames & several IPs. Between the vandalism and the reverting thereof, we're now at over 140 edits in two hours. AddWittyNameHere (talk) 00:24, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected by Malcolmxl5 for 48 hours. tutterMouse (talk) 07:23, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent vandalism by blocked user QuackersClocks as an IP user. Nat Gertler (talk) 00:11, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Acroterion for one month. tutterMouse (talk) 07:23, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Mr. Guye (talk) 00:11, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected by Gogo Dodo. tutterMouse (talk) 07:21, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – An IP editor has been edit warring to add unsourced material re predecessor/successor information. This has been going on for several days and they refuse to engage on the talk page. JbhTalk 01:34, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Steel for 6 months. tutterMouse (talk) 07:23, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content by different IP's. When the film is released internationally next week, the level of vandalism will most likely increase. Downwiththesyndrome (talk) 12:39, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Katietalk 19:02, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism. wiki tamil 100 14:03, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

  • (non-admin comment) Tagging an article as needing improvement isn't vandalism. On the plus side, this nom did lead me to that article, which I've since expanded. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:00, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • (non-admin comment) At the time of the request, the requestor was the only person to have ever edited the page. Also claimed "vandalism" when asking for his user page to be protected - Arjayay (talk) 12:33, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Katietalk 19:02, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP keeps on making changes which aren't needed. Have given one warning to the IP as a welcome template but is persistent. .  — Calvin999 15:19, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Katietalk 19:04, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of black washing, WP:POV, WP:ORIGINAL, Cherry pickings and meatpuppetting. Ferakp (talk) 15:16, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • If I may, strong oppose. As a veteran editor, who WP:DGAF, this is a strongly POV pushing editor who seems to be adept at using a variety of forums to try to 'lock in' his preferred views on violence against Kurdish women (which, apparently, is nothing to see here, folks). Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:25, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I strongly disagree with Shawn in Montreal. Shawn in Montreal attacked me personally, called me as an editor with a clear pro-Kurdish nationalist bias. Now he is following me and continuing the same behavior against me. This user has very weird behavior towards Kurdish articles. He wants to keep the Kurdish terrorism category, but wants to delete the Turkish terrorism category. He reversed my changes which were simply appropriate edits, I changed two statements against WP:POV and WP:ORIGINAL, but he wanted to kept them even though they were clearly falsified statements and sources didn't verify them. Also, I explained all edits statement by statement, what is wrong with them and how they should be edited according to the WP rules. One user is continuously using different IP address and black washing Kurdish articles. I believe Shawn in Montreal is supporting those Turks who are continuously black washing Kurdish articles. He is happy with all edits against Kurdish articles, but not happy with edits when even something than positive is added to Turkish articles. Ferakp (talk) 18:10, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined This isn't the place to argue who's right and who's wrong. Take this to ANI or dispute resolution. Katietalk 19:01, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandal that got the article protected the last time is back (and block evading again). Majora (talk) 19:40, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks Kuru! (tagging for the bot) --Majora (talk) 22:20, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protect this article for a week. It looks like he is going to win the 2016 Masters Tournament and vandals have struck the article at least twice in the last few hours. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 22:17, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (I saw the article before I saw this protection request, otherwise I would have protected it for a week like you asked.) --Bongwarrior (talk) 22:35, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection (a week or so): Persistent disruption from an IP-hopping, disgruntled, indefinitely blocked editor; see this section on my talk page, and this IP of his that was recently blocked. Blocking the IP will not stop this editor from posting at that talk page soon afterward, which is why I am requesting protection of the talk page. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 07:36, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of five days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:21, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temple articles

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. These pages just came off protection and the same vandalism (NPOV commentary) has resumed. clpo13(talk) 21:17, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Kuru and Peacemaker67:, you've blocked these IPs, could you look at semi-protection? clpo13(talk) 21:47, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Ms. Naught protected one. Kuru (talk) 21:58, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you both. clpo13(talk) 22:03, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done (for the bot) BethNaught (talk) 22:04, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Un-salt This article title was salted after two successful deletion nominations. The main concern was failure to meet WP:BIO and the nature of the article (a young sportswoman subject to sexualization) complicated creation of anything useful at the time (2007). That time has long since passed and I have written a new draft at User:Sillyfolkboy/Allison Stokke which I feel is strong and resolves all the concerns mentioned in past discussions. This was salted in 2007 so original admin is now inactive. Please can this be unsalted so I can create the article? Thanks. SFB 17:32, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done and moved. Katietalk 19:24, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

12 April 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 21:12, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 20:19, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IPv6 vandalism. Most likley a block evasion of some sort... 2601:1C0:4901:2191:998A:16AB:98DD:E155 (talk) 23:04, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 20:21, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. General Ization Talk 00:43, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 20:23, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. HC 5555 (talk) 02:58, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism including pornographic content and other explicit wording. Please semi-protect. Thanks. Bobsanders1991 (talk) 01:55, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 20:25, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 01:53, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 19:16, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-vandalism - part of article within scope of WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. Sean.hoyland - talk 09:09, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Ian.thomson. tutterMouse (talk) 19:45, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-vandalism, for article under WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. Sean.hoyland - talk 09:09, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Ian.thomson for one year. tutterMouse (talk) 19:46, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-vandalism, for article under WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. Sean.hoyland - talk 09:09, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Ian.thomson. tutterMouse (talk) 19:46, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-vandalism, for article under WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. Sean.hoyland - talk 09:09, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Katietalk 18:59, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Extended confirmed protection: IP-vandalism, for article under WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. Sean.hoyland - talk 09:09, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Katietalk 18:58, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Disruptive editing – This page has been getting a lot of negative attention from IPs lately. PC would be nice until things calm down a bit. -©2016 Compassionate727(Talk)(Contributions) 14:20, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 19:03, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: As with anything even remotely concerned with the Middle East, this article regularly suffers political/nationalistic drive-by editing at odds with what the cited sources actually say. It has gotten particularly bad lately, with not just anon IPs but also a string of new redlink accounts apparently created to get around the article's occasional semi-protection.--Tenebrae (talk) 14:46, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I realize some of these accounts are autoconfirmed but most are not. Regardless, it does not yet rise to the level where full protection is warranted. Katietalk 19:09, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by several IPs. Mike1901 (talk) 18:23, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 19:12, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 23:41, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Katietalk 19:11, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I think the same IP is using different IP addresses. Keeps on adding unsourced info about a new single and changing dates of previous singles. I've welcome warned and reverted but can't anymore. This has been going on for weeks now.  — Calvin999 20:24, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 16:44, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full-protection: Persistent edit warring - editor continously restoring the article to their preferred version with little talk page activity. Protect page to encourage discussion. 31.49.133.154 (talk) 20:52, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Make that "little to none TP activity" and also they seem to be talking through edit summaries instead of using the TP. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 06:32, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That includes you too, hypocrite!!! 31.49.133.154 (talk) 13:32, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 16:46, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent name calling over the last week or so. Dismas|(talk) 14:50, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Semi-protected for 10 days. DES (talk) 15:21, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – There is way too much editing by unregistered users on this page, most of which are at best pointless and at worst vandalism. Kautilya3 (talk) 16:24, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'd like to try this first. At times the edit rate is too high for PC, I think MusikAnimal talk 15:57, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I asked for protection this morning but was bizarrely declined, Anyway since December IP's have been constantly changing the episodes to incorrect info (They've been doing this since July), The article was protected for 4 months and now protection's ended IPs have come back to revert & vandalize the article again, I don't think these IPs are ever going to go so personally think indef is the best option however I'll leave that up to the deciding admin, Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 18:16, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 16:05, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks MusikAnimal - Very much appreciated :) –Davey2010Talk 16:21, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: I would like my userpage protected please. Xx C00l G$Y xt@lk 18:47, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're the only one who has edited your userpage. Usually admins protect userpages only if other users vandalize them. Peter Sam Fan 15:39, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done I've protected it, as they are entitled to, but I think we've got bigger problems here MusikAnimal talk 16:12, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 22:57, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Ponyo for 2 weeks. tutterMouse (talk) 08:25, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistant IP and unknown user vandalism of adding false dates and fan messages. Please make this a PERMANENT semi-protection. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 06:47, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing by several IPs. Krimuk|90 (talk) 10:05, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 10:12, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Restore page protection due to Edit warring / content dispute which was removed after page was moved. 31.49.133.154 (talk) 13:26, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

pinging @Peacemaker67: Lectonar (talk) 08:31, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:42, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – The same anonymous person with dynamic IPs adding unsourced contents. Need a long term protection. Charles Turing (talk) 14:19, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:51, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 23:07, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

13 April 2016

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.My Stunt39 (talk) 13:00, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I don't see any vandalism MusikAnimal talk 17:02, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Legacypac (talk) 15:33, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Seems to have stopped on 11 April MusikAnimal talk 16:42, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry by banned editor Filipz123. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 18:29, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 21:22, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Filipz123. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 18:35, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 21:22, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Filipz123. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 18:35, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 21:21, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Filipz123. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 18:59, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 21:21, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:06, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Mattythewhite. MusikAnimal talk 21:19, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. wiki tamil 100 13:02, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Declined No one has edited this page except you (and the user who nominated it for deletion) MusikAnimal talk 16:35, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism spree by IP hopping vandal with registered accounts. 2601:1C0:4901:2191:9172:A3FB:72D5:71ED (talk) 00:31, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. MusikAnimal talk 16:32, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Continuous IPv6 hopping vandals. 2601:1C0:4901:2191:9172:A3FB:72D5:71ED (talk) 01:21, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Seems to have stopped MusikAnimal talk 16:34, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: Highly visible template – Highly visible template. . Peter Sam Fan 02:08, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined At just over 400 transclusions I think semi is sufficient MusikAnimal talk 16:34, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. Xx C00l G$Y0xt@lk 13:31, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages are almost never protected. Peter Sam Fan 15:08, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – User talk pages are not protected except in response to severe or continued vandalism. MusikAnimal talk 16:35, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Because pages like major news companies need a page protection because people can put stuff that is not true about the company down . . sbf1998 16:29, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It's a wiki, you could say the same about any page. Fortunately we've got an army of patrollers protecting it! MusikAnimal talk 16:41, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Filipz123. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 18:58, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 19:30, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: An anon IP vandal keeps on adding hoax "upcoming" teams in this article. Anon also created an account adding the same content. See 1, 2, 3 for evidence. -WayKurat (talk) 07:50, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:03, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – this is the fourth request , please see the edit history , abusive words are being added by other claimants followers by ip addresses. Summichum (talk) 09:08, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:06, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated IP vandalism, particularly changing his name in the infobox. Few days should suffice, it's probably coz his retirement is the top story on BBC Sport. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:46, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 18:02, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 19:47, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 18:03, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption as soon as protection expired. Qed237 (talk) 19:48, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 18:04, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: as per WP:ARBPIA3#500/30 / WP:EXTENDEDCONFIRMED. 31.49.133.154 (talk) 17:34, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done--Ymblanter (talk) 18:01, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Recurrent IP vandalism in the form of adding a link to Brendan Fraser, an article which also appears presently to be semi-protected. 45ossington (talk) 08:00, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 17:06, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some IP keeps adding some unsourced meme stuff to the article as well vandalizing it here & there, Could report the IP but they'd be back under a new one so coming here instead, Thanks,. –Davey2010Talk 20:29, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 17:03, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:25, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 16:54, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Currently has pending changes protection but as far as I can see in the article's history all of the edits have been reverted. Music1201 talk 02:54, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Leaving the indef PC in place MusikAnimal talk 16:55, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by IP jumping editor regarding use of Infobox. Has refused to discuss in the past and now just ignores requests. See talk page discussion. Escape Orbit (Talk) 10:39, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Widr (talk) 12:47, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Recent change of the official name to Gurugram has triggered a spate of anonymous edits. Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 12:54, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 17:01, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full-protection: Persistent edit warring - multiple editors restoring the article to their preferred version. Editor Sarah Lee88 join date 5 April 2016 and is only editing this page or information linked to this article to editor's preferred perspective with little talk page activity. Seems to be a vandalism account. Protect page to prevent further edit warring. 1mag1n3 (talk) 05:57, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, seems to have stopped, sorry for not reacting earlier.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:52, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: as per WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. 31.49.133.154 (talk) 21:13, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Drmies. MusikAnimal talk 16:30, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism by IP users. Has been protected before . Peter Sam Fan 00:31, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 16:30, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: The article has been subject to vandalism and sockpuppetry by IP socks of long-term abuser Bertrand101. Sixth of March 01:19, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 16:33, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 15:01, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 16:36, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Deleted 5 times in the last month; creator responded to sockpuppet block by creating another sockpuppet to recreate the article again: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Earl Williams III and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Willywill3x. Also created once each in 2 other election years (2008 and 2014). So far, no attempts to use other titles — I suspect it's the name required for his write-in votes to count. Also, not that it matters here, but the same user has also responded to deletion on en.wp by pasting it onto Simple English Wikipedia twice so far (simple:Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2016/David Earl Williams III). Create protection until 2016-11-09 (the day after the U.S. election) might get the point across, at least for this year, though I suspect it will happen again in 2018 or 2020. --Closeapple (talk) 15:56, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected MusikAnimal talk 16:39, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:58, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 16:39, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 05:30, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, seems to have stopped, and also part of the story seems to be a content dispute.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:23, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. General Ization Talk 12:16, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 12:51, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This SPI has been edited by a number of sockpuppets which appear to be unrelated to the user under investigation. Notably, one of these was a page move, which resulted in the case being de-listed from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cases/Overview since the bot that maintains the page does not handle page moves well. Sir Sputnik (talk) 04:00, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Widr (talk) 12:49, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of IP vandalism since April 9, when page became unprotected. Random86 (talk) 12:42, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 12:46, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Yeepsi (talk) 23:00, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 10:16, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} 23:19, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 10:17, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. McGeddon (talk) 09:33, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:50, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism, removing cited content. Appears to be the same user who vandalised the Death of Meredith Hunter article days ago. 45.40.143.57 (talk) 03:43, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:22, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: An IP-hopping vandal is persistently changing the results. Just a day or two of protection should be enough. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 04:04, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:25, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is being targeted for vandalism by several different IP addresses. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:43, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 08:49, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – A few IPs have been altering the sockmaster template of this blocked user to claim that it's not the master. No reason why any unconfirmed user would ever want to edit this user page. McGeddon (talk) 08:43, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 08:47, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Multiple IP #REDIRECT reverts from January 2016 with no improvements to the article.   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  16:58, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:06, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: One of a number of airport pages being persistently vandalised by user with varying IP addresses ('Indian airport statistics vandal'). VG31-irl 17:28, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:09, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: One of a number of airport pages being persistently vandalised by user with varying IP addresses ('Indian airport statistics vandal'). VG31-irl 17:29, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:11, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: One of a number of airport pages being persistently vandalised by user with varying IP addresses ('Indian airport statistics vandal'). VG31-irl 17:30, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:15, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced content. Qed237 (talk) 23:48, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:18, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent refactoring of other's talk by roving IP. A partial list of IPs can be found here: talk:social work#IP-hopper or talk:social work#IP-Petitioners (IP has been editing section header) for partial list. All IPs geolocte to Kerala,India Jim1138 (talk) 18:46, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Diannaa for one month. tutterMouse (talk) 06:49, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.

Semi-protected by Ruslik0 for 3 months. tutterMouse (talk) 22:33, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. George Ho (talk) 05:52, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:05, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther :  Talk  22:25, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. MusikAnimal talk 20:20, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LG-Gunther :  Talk  22:33, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. MusikAnimal talk 20:20, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 19:14, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Blocked user. Xx C00l G$Y x#t@lk 17:08, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This user has not done anything to warrant their talk page access being revoked. Sarahj2107 (talk) 19:28, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

14 April 2016

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content. CLCStudent (talk) 17:24, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 19:39, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 17:48, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 19:39, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ref-desk troll has returned immediately after protection was ended. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:06, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Jayron32. MusikAnimal talk 19:40, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: High level of IP vandalism, and regular disruptive editing, and deliberate removal of references. Awardgadu (talk) 11:29, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MusikAnimal talk 14:47, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: High level of IP vandalism, and regular disruptive editing, and deliberate removal of references. Awardgadu (talk) 11:31, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MusikAnimal talk 14:48, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP hopper has continually brought back an article that had been merged into another article ages ago by discussion at Talk:War in Donbass. This disruptive behaviour should be stopped with semi protection. RGloucester 16:51, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:53, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • User RGloucester take an advantage over IP users using page protection request. Note, it was no any discussion (!) related to this article (neither merging nor deletion). User merged it without consensus. Many other users reverted this merging during the year, see [46] [47] [48]. Also user RGloucester violated 3-revert rule many times. The discussion about merging should start first. Note, four interwikies are present with big articles in ru-wiki and uk-wiki for this page wiht many sources in it. Please restore the article without redirecting before unconsensus merging. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.211.253.73 (talk) 18:03, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring with dynamic IP`s. Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content (campaign of some Nichiren sect?). JimRenge (talk) 21:09, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., do not see any need for full protection at the moment.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:21, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article that keeps on getting reverted back after being voted to be a redirect. Wgolf (talk) 00:24, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:24, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – In the past, after a year-long period of pending changes protection was changed to temporary semi-protection, but now the problematic edits that resulted in the pending changes protection have started again. I recommend indef pending changes due to this article's protection history. Steel1943 (talk) 14:59, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected BethNaught (talk) 15:16, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: Long-running edit war between multiple parties over the infobox format. An IP is up to five reverts in the last 24 hours and another editor recently exceeded 3RR. Suggest week-long protection at least. Number 57 15:02, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 15:28, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The page is targeted by multiple IP's and regitered users see Revision history. Thank You. GSS (talk) 16:01, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:27, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Someone is persistently trying to include non-encyclopedic information. – Muboshgu (talk) 05:34, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 14:49, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Renew pending changes: There have been reverts. Meanwhile, the protecting administrator is inactive for weeks. --George Ho (talk) 07:38, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 14:52, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – protected only recently. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 12:11, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 14:49, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protection: User:DumbBOT is malfunctioning and constantly creating these categories with technical gobbledygook. All categories for every date from today to around May 1 need creation protection so the bot stops making them (this should buy us time to fix this). I suggest having the protection expire the day after the date in the category name, since it shouldn't be needed after that date. Discussions are here and here. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 00:33, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protection for a category is not really an option...you want semi or full protection? Lectonar (talk) 09:02, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, closing for the bot without prejudice against renomination with refined arguments.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:24, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Too much IP vandalism. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:57, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 36 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please actually warn/talk to editors before asking again as I see the last few making disruptive edits haven't even been spoken to. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 14:30, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism from various new editors and unregistered editors. epicgenius, presented by reddit.com/r/funny (talk) 00:40, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 14:45, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing from IPs. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 00:52, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: In addition to protection, the main vandal of this article 24.68.52.218 (talk · contribs) should be reblocked. Music1201 talk 01:27, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 14:44, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Renew pending changes: There have been reverts, especially yesterday. Protecting administrator either on vacation or inactive at the moment. George Ho (talk) 07:40, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Renew yes please. "Gas" is a popular word. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 08:13, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, these science words are totally steaming up the vandalism. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 08:14, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected MusikAnimal talk 14:46, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Recently came off 1 year of semi-protection. Vandalism/BLP issues have immediately came back. Stickee (talk) 12:03, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected Widr (talk) 14:34, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, specifically genre warring.Dan56 (talk) 03:15, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 09:17, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection This article is a perennial favorite of vandals, but the vandalism has been especially bad recently. — MShabazz Talk/Stalk 10:32, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:11, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Socks of many IP/other registered users WP:DE to The Price Is Right (U.S. game show) and related articles. In edits and edit summaries, "Pa Pappa" is added and/or replaces text with this phrase in the article.

Most-recent editing repeatedly added and removed blank lines to article with nonsense edit summaries.

Three most-recent users' edits, all on 14 April 2016:

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The three accounts have all been indefinitely blocked as well. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:17, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page has become a stomping ground for IP's and anonymous editors for adding unverifiable information of a yet-to-be released album, that is failing to meet notability for album releases. livelikemusic talk! 15:02, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:27, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 15:02, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., infrequent but steady disruption, I configured pending changes--Ymblanter (talk) 10:31, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Ongoing persistent vandalism for a long while. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 17:25, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:33, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi protection Persistent vandalism by IPs. 7&6=thirteen () 20:16, 13 April 2016 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. The user appears to be inactive, but their talk page is getting repeatedly vandalized by sockpuppets. MelanieN (talk) 00:57, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:30, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:28, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A disorder which people are highly offended by disruptive edits. Xx C00l G$Y x#t@lk 13:15, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:39, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of recent vandalism. Melonkelon (talk) 00:51, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Gilliam for 2 weeks. tutterMouse (talk) 05:54, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Probably would be helpful to consider an indef or long term semi. Reverting the day's IP vandalism is starting to become a staple of my morning routine...a bit more than I would prefer. TimothyJosephWood 13:50, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vandalism is not terribly frequent but it is persistent. Let's give PC a try. MelanieN (talk) 00:46, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Lots of disruptive editing after recent vandalism received some news coverage. FallingGravity (talk) 17:14, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Gilliam.. MelanieN (talk) 00:52, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Filipz123. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 18:59, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. MusikAnimal talk 21:19, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High-level of disruptive editing by IP's and anonymous editors, creating and editing information that directly contradicts verifiable sources within article. livelikemusic talk! 00:41, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:35, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Deceased as of 4/12/16. Xx C00l G$Y x#t@lk 19:22, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Nonsense MusikAnimal talk 20:26, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent, consistent vandalism by obvious sockpuppets. . Peter Sam Fan 22:14, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 23:14, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: as per WP:ARBPIA3#500/30 / WP:EXTENDEDCONFIRMED. 31.49.133.154 (talk) 18:05, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. I don't believe this subject is unambiguously related to the conflict, just a few sentences therein. It seems a simple block (after sufficient warning) will suffice here, or semi at best. Note usage of WP:30/500 in general is currently being discussed MusikAnimal talk 18:44, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: as per WP:ARBPIA3#500/30 / WP:EXTENDEDCONFIRMED. 31.49.133.154 (talk) 18:05, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Same as above, this page in particular does not seem directly related to the conflict MusikAnimal talk 18:45, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Continued re-addition of many-times rejected material by varying IP addresses as well as one named WP:SPA, although I strongly suspect them all of belonging to the same master, per filed investigation. LjL (talk) 22:08, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 23:11, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Consistent, persistent vandalism by obvious sockpuppets. . Peter Sam Fan 22:13, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 23:12, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I have had three instances of personal attacks to either my talk or User page in recent days. All were done by unregistered IPs. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:22, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please note this edit[49] by an IP repeating the same personal attack he made earlier on my user page and which I reverted....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:39, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – User talk pages are not protected except in response to severe or continued vandalism. MusikAnimal talk 18:01, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent edit warring – Recent edit warring by numerous IPs and anonymous users. 31.49.133.154 (talk) 13:40, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, stopped three days ago.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:06, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism spree by IP hopping vandal with registered accounts. 2601:1C0:4901:2191:9172:A3FB:72D5:71ED (talk) 00:31, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. MusikAnimal talk 18:05, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

15 April 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Continuous edit warring for the past few days involving various IPs and newly created SPAs over the "Largest victory" in the infobox and in the El Clásico#Biggest wins (5+ goals) section. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:58, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 21:00, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: 2016 NFL Draft is near, Goff is the #1 quarterback available. Combine those two facts, and you get lots of IP vandalism prematurely announcing Goff as their favorites team's pick (see edit history). Draft is on April 28-30, so I'd recommend semi-protection until May 1. bender235 (talk) 17:32, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 20:56, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Several unrelated IPs keep changing the succesor from Fernando de la Rúa to Rafael Trujillo, for reasons beyond human comprehension. Cambalachero (talk) 18:02, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 20:58, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The ref-desk troll has returned yet again. Could it be possible to set protection for a bit longer this time?. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:35, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. Katietalk 20:54, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – I don't know when this is going to stop, but the edit history clearly shows that it's been happening for more than a week now over one issue. The page should be protected until a consensus can be reached and agreed upon among all editors, but it seems like that's not happening right now. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 21:00, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Seems to have stopped. Widr (talk) 13:07, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – As with Surface Book above, this page has been subject to a seemingly never-ending content dispute over a single issue, and again, page protection should not be removed until a consensus has been reached among all editors. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 21:02, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Seems to have stopped. Widr (talk) 13:07, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Longer semi-protection: Repeated WP:BLP-violation (addition of irrelevant negative info about the son's alleged activities) by an SPA IP-editor in the 137.191.*.* range. Just waits, until previous semi-protections expire. GermanJoe (talk) 12:25, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:24, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mid-to-long term Semi-protection: Long term, low frequency IP edit warring, dating back over a month. Seems to be trying to remove or downplay criticism of claims that this drug was responsible for the recent microcephaly cases in Brazil. Will provide diffs to illustrate POV pushing and edit warring if needed. MjolnirPants Tell me all about it. 12:43, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The article has been subject to edit-warring on the same issue since at least as far back as February. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:19, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in IP vandalism. Page has a lengthy protection history. Calidum ¤ 04:50, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 13:04, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Renew pending changes: While protection is expiring soon, the administrator whom I contacted hasn't responded yet. Vandalism has been occurring over time, including the last few days. George Ho (talk) 06:32, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Widr (talk) 06:38, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is currently under attack by a sock of a well-known troll, who was twice blocked in the past, once by Materialscientist and once by JamesBWatson. Initially, he pretends he is non-connected IP engaged in a genuine dispute but eventually gives himself away by calling me a "known edit warrior". Codename Lisa (talk) 09:05, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full Protection: The edit that Codename Lisa insists on making is original research 172.56.1.142 (talk) 09:20, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This protection is to stop the edit-warring, in the hope that the dispute can be, not to support either of the editors involved in the dispute. Codename Lisa, can you provide evidence that the other editor in the dispute is "a sock of a well-known troll, who was twice blocked in the past"? It isn't at all obvious. I have found one block I placed on an IP address in the same range, but there is no immediately obvious similarity between recent edits and the edits from before I made the block. Also, rather than just reverting and asserting that "It is definitely Windows XP", can you explain how you can tell that? I am not saying that yo are wrong, I am just saying that you need to justify your assertion, as we can't just accept it because a Wikipedia editor says so. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:41, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@JamesBWatson: I will open a thread in the image talk page to answer the questions asked. This place isn't exactly communication-friendly. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 11:45, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Changed to semi-protection, as Codename Lisa has provided me with information which confirms that the IP editor is a troll who is stalking and harassing Lisa. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:03, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The page is currently under attack by a sock of a well-known troll and vandal, which Materialscientist and JamesBWatson have twice blocked in the past. He is IP-hopping right now. He always gives himself away by called me an "admitted edit warrior". And there is also the geolocation evidence. There other behavior signs too, I just don't think I should fit them in here. Codename Lisa (talk) 09:12, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:05, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: One of the terms used to define the Highest God of the universe in the Chinese traditional religion, in Confucianism particularly but also in Yiguandao and other popular religions. An anonymous user has repeatedly attempted to impose a Christian interpretation of the term.--Aethelwolf Emsworth (talk) 20:45, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:47, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 00:30, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 00:41, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The other pages in my user space have been semi protected against a persistent troll, but this archive page was created more recently - I would like to have it protected, too. There is no reason for any ips or new users to modify an archived page after all. bonadea contributions talk 06:59, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected BethNaught (talk) 07:01, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Blocked user is vandalising page, may need talk page privileges revoked . RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:10, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. Widr (talk) 20:14, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Blocked user using talk page to continue vandalism. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:14, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. Widr (talk) 20:15, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Widr protected page for a week during which there was no disruption. 37 hours after protection expired we have 12 revisions, all vandalism or the reversion of it (diff). The nature of the vandalism is almost always quite insulting/degrading to transgender people too. Requesting longer protection. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 04:10, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 04:32, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – 56,000+ transclusions. ~ RobTalk 20:51, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indef. AlexiusHoratius 00:50, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:05, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 00:52, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – restore pending changes which was removed after page was semi-protected. Needs frequent patrol by pending changes due to persistent vandalism by IP users. 31.49.133.154 (talk) 21:23, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 01:01, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:30, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 01:00, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Liverpool just won a match, disruption on players (BLP). Qed237 (talk) 21:32, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 00:58, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Binksternet (talk) 23:50, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 00:55, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism after recent release from protection period. 2601:1C0:4901:2191:C149:1397:ECD3:FA4D (talk) 00:16, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 00:57, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ww2censor (talk) 22:14, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 00:42, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection or Pending changes: IP vandalism revolving around things like changing peacock to peaCOCK and peacunt. This is a popular article that gets between 2,500 and 3,000 views daily, and it is going to be the target of these kinds of edits by IP users for as long as the word "peacock" exists in the English language. In light of that, I'd like to propose some kind of indefinite protection. If that is not granted, then someone will just have to come back here and propose protection again someday. KDS4444Talk 23:16, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Almost all the IP edits are made by schools. We don't protect pages preemptively, and we're perfectly okay with another request sometime down the road. :-) Katietalk 00:40, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. As a redirect, this should be protected alongside the main article/page. 2601:1C0:4901:2191:C149:1397:ECD3:FA4D (talk) 00:33, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: There doesn't appear to be enough vandalism on the redirect (history page) to warrant the need for semi-protection at this time. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:35, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Oshwah: Contrary, since there is no informational content on the redirect at all, I don't see why this shouldn't be protected. There isn't a single IP/Non-Autoconfirmed user edit that has not been reverted. 2601:1C0:4901:2191:C149:1397:ECD3:FA4D (talk) 00:44, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indef. (Nothing really gained by leaving it unprotected.) AlexiusHoratius 00:47, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This page concerns an injunction obtained to prevent publication of details of the private life of a celebrity couple. Some form of preemptive protection may be appropriate given the story is currently in the media. DanielJCooper (talk) 22:44, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 20:12, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism of adding false numbers of attendance. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 06:44, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 19:50, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IP user 58.104.11.195. Note that on 17:20, 12 April 2016 IP removed significant amount of content without reason.. – Nick Mitchell 98 talk 12:31, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 20:11, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Opencooper (talk) 15:08, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 20:10, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: People keep adding themselves to the article. ItsIzumi (talk) 17:19, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 20:13, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – None of IP edits have been accepted lately, especially this month. George Ho (talk) 18:49, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Widr (talk) 20:15, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article that keeps on getting reverted to a redirect. Wgolf (talk) 18:59, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Resolved with moving the page MusikAnimal talk 20:17, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Siksha O Anusandhan University (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Pending changes: Constant whitewashing over the last few days of the "Accreditation" section by IPs. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 11:22, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:52, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated unexplained removal of content including references by anon IP. Request for discussion on talk has gone unanswered. Dialectric (talk) 16:30, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined there is only one IP, an their talk page is a redlink. If they continue after warning, they should be blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:54, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Users that are not admins are able to delete articles from site . sbf1998 16:53, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Declined Not vandalism. The user proposed deletion for valid reasons MusikAnimal talk 19:37, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

16 April 2016

Short descriptive header

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism, often WP:SNEAKY manipulations of sourced figures. Suggesting indefinite protection, as with the ongoing ethnic conflicts in that region, there's no reason why this vandalism would be expected to stop soon. If unsure about the (limited) number of really helpful IP contributions, pending changes might be enough, though these sneaky manipulations will cost us quite some nerves to figure out. PanchoS (talk) 02:36, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 13:09, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

temporary semi-protection: a rotating series of IPs (thus there is no way to issue warnings that will be seen) is changing information that is sourced to info that is not. MarnetteD|Talk 16:55, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 18:05, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Also has been created under Unigu and UNIGU. . Wgolf (talk) 18:05, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:12, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks-might want to PP all 3 of those pages though! Wgolf (talk) 19:29, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Protected one; another one was only created once, added it to my watchlist.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:00, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: continuous edit warring among multiples users. I think most of them have very little edits so wouldn't be autoconfirmed yet? Jolly Ω Janner 04:21, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Just for now. Full protection might be necessary if the edit warring doesn't soon stop. Widr (talk) 13:00, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IPs removing sockpuppet template. Ebyabe talk - Welfare State08:52, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 12:54, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EauZenCashHaveIt (I'm All Ears) 11:40, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Widr (talk) 12:52, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Sockpuppetry and disruptive editing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 12:08, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 12:51, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive edits, including fancruft. Snuggums (talk / edits) 14:40, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 12:49, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandal-edits today for IPs...annoyed at having to revert. Again. Shearonink (talk) 17:25, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 12:48, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Same issue as with Jaref Goff (above). Over-excited fans cannot wait to until the draft. Please also semi-protect until May 1. bender235 (talk) 17:35, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 12:48, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Mass IP attack for several days now. 2607:FB90:A502:88F9:0:3C:D175:F701 (talk) 19:14, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 12:44, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Protected many times before in the past. 2607:FB90:A502:88F9:0:3C:D175:F701 (talk) 19:56, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 12:40, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – The user keeps creating this article under different names. Peter Sam Fan 22:14, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Created and deleted once. If it's created under different title, this would have no effect. Widr (talk) 12:39, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent problems with disruptive editing trying to remove well-sourced material that is critical of the subject. Delta13C (talk) 06:20, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 11:33, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Renew pending changes: Very low editing. However, none of changed that pended review have been accepted. Does BLP apply? --George Ho (talk) 08:12, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Widr (talk) 11:32, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Harassment by IP jumping editor. clpo13(talk) 04:23, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Seems to have stopped already. Widr (talk) 11:28, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long history of vandalism. Flow234 (talk) 11:26, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 11:28, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Extended confirmed protection: IP disruption/trolling - this is one of the most prominent articles covered by WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. Sean.hoyland - talk 11:44, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The ARBCOM authorized WP:ARBPIA3#500/30 restriction will be enforced at that article whether or not it is given extended confirmed protection. The rule is that "All IP editors, accounts with fewer than 500 edits, and accounts with less than 30 days tenure are prohibited from editing any page that could be reasonably construed as being related to the Arab-Israeli conflict." If the rule is not enforced by the server via extended confirmed protection, it will be enforced by editors. The effect will be the same but the cost is different. Extended confirmed protection simply automates the enforcement of a restriction that already applies. Sean.hoyland - talk 14:25, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done Widr (talk) 14:36, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Harassment by IP jumping editor. clpo13(talk) 04:23, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Seems to have stopped already. Widr (talk) 11:28, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long history of vandalism. Flow234 (talk) 11:26, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 11:28, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Extended confirmed protection: IP disruption/trolling - this is one of the most prominent articles covered by WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. Sean.hoyland - talk 11:44, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The ARBCOM authorized WP:ARBPIA3#500/30 restriction will be enforced at that article whether or not it is given extended confirmed protection. The rule is that "All IP editors, accounts with fewer than 500 edits, and accounts with less than 30 days tenure are prohibited from editing any page that could be reasonably construed as being related to the Arab-Israeli conflict." If the rule is not enforced by the server via extended confirmed protection, it will be enforced by editors. The effect will be the same but the cost is different. Extended confirmed protection simply automates the enforcement of a restriction that already applies. Sean.hoyland - talk 14:25, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done Widr (talk) 14:36, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection for a month or so: Persistently high level of IP vandalism. High visibility and due to occur. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 21:16, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 13:05, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Favre1fan93 (talk) 00:43, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 13:04, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: VERY High level of IP vandalism by adding false dates and attendance numbers. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 02:22, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 13:03, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant IP vandalism over the last day or 2. Seppi333 (Insert ) 03:42, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Widr (talk) 13:02, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued disruptive editing from shifting 2606:6000:* IP addresses already warned many times about edit warring, per this ANI thread. McGeddon (talk) 08:47, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 12:55, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Longer semi-protection: Repeated WP:BLP-violation (addition of irrelevant negative info about the son's alleged activities) by an SPA IP-editor in the 137.191.*.* range. Just waits, until previous semi-protections expire. GermanJoe (talk) 12:25, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected Widr (talk) 12:51, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection for a month or so: Persistently high level of IP vandalism. High visibility and due to occur. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 13:04, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 13:08, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: multiple disruptive editions, this Wikipedia page suffers of lots of vandalism and issues by unregistered users.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 6:6, April 16, 2016 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 13:06, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruption by several IP addresses. VQuakr (talk) 19:39, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 12:43, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Article has been subject to sustained block evasion for about a month now. I have filed an SPI at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dcasey98 which thoroughly details the nature of the disruption. Betty Logan (talk) 19:53, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 12:42, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by various new users. BattleshipMan (talk) 00:11, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 12:38, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing by new users.
Christopher, Salem, OR (talk) 02:48, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 12:37, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – edit-warring involving multiple IPs, ongoing several days - one user blocked already. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:46, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. A range block seems to have stopped the disruption, and it's renewable if the need arises. Favonian (talk) 07:21, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Continuing disruption by IP editors insistent on adding unsourced information. clpo13(talk) 04:38, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Protect this page instead of block the IP editors. 36.85.90.46 (talk) 04:42, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 11:35, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Failure to discuss on talk page. LynwoodF (talk) 08:48, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 11:31, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous target of sockpuppets and IP craft. —IB [ Poke ] 10:48, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 11:29, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by unregistered editors. ElKevbo (talk) 21:36, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 22:59, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs keep vandalizing the lead. Page was semi-protected a couple weeks ago because of vandalism; a week after that expired the vandalism started up again. —Torchiest talkedits 21:54, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 21:59, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Consistent removal of paragraph about Frank Zappa cover by IPs, despite it being sourced. Laber□T 22:57, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 22:58, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

17 April 2016

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – the 53rd position is disputed and many IP attempt to vandalize as seen from edit history. Summichum (talk) 05:14, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Katietalk 15:31, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Keystroke (talk) 15:07, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 15:09, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: General crap that has resumed since the expiration of the previous protection. —DangerousJXD (talk) 19:43, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:48, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Persistent vandalism by IP. 7&6=thirteen () 00:58, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. 7&6=thirteen () 14:00, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Malcolmxl5.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:59, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. The page clearly states that it is citing the smallest full-time NFL stadium, which is Soldier Field, and an anonymous editor keeps on changing it toOakland Coliseum which is shared with the MLB. Maybe a semi-protection for a few weeks will chase these anonymous editors away. Jdavi333 (talk) 02:05, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:01, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Requesting temporary semi-protection. Different IP's changing "Point guard" to "Point God" since March. Borikén (talk) 02:45, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 14:54, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Uncited edited from newly created accounts. AkoAyMayLobo (talk) 03:51, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Widr (talk) 14:55, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. –Qpalzmmzlapq T C 19:05, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:06, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppetry from User:Supreme Genghis Khan. TheCoffeeAddict talk|contribs 00:32, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, just one edit, feel free to report again if disruption resumes.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:58, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Requesting temporary semi-protection, in addition to the full-move-protection. Disruption and violation of WP:NOR from multiple different sources. Thank you admins !!!. — Cirt (talk) 02:27, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 13:40, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 04:20, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 13:44, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Second request. This page is being continually edited from multiple IPs by a persistent vandal whose behaviour against this article accounts for the entirety of all edits to the article in the last 5 years. Page has previously been protected for this reason, but activity resumes when protection expires. Bonusballs (talk) 10:55, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Widr (talk) 13:55, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: Edit warning. --Nasrussian (talk) 12:30, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, one blocked user asks to semiprotect the talk page of another blocked user.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:55, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 04:56, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 13:34, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated blanking or replacement of text. Sjö (talk) 07:40, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:38, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced spoilers by IP addresses. Would be ideal if the page was protected until the beginning of June, when the season currently airing is likely to finish. Linguist 111talk 17:26, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 17:29, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Block evasion with a different IP address to continue edit warring . McSly (talk) 15:24, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 15:33, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Block evasion with a different IP address to continue edit warring . McSly (talk) 15:24, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 15:33, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent inclusion of unsourced contentious material; BLP. Ryk72 'c.s.n.s.' 15:50, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:36, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Referee under attack from "supporters". Could be good to hise some revisions as well. Qed237 (talk) 14:17, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator GiantSnowman. Katietalk 14:59, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring against consensus, multiple IPs. Binksternet (talk) 14:54, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 15:00, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: It was indefinitely protected nearly 5 years ago due to a sockpuppet who now appears to be inactive. The1337gamer (talk) 10:32, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Katietalk 15:04, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing more than vandalism. WP:NOTNEWS additions and premature changes. '''tAD''' (talk) 22:36, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:53, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and sockpuppetry. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Beachwithz. clpo13(talk) 05:46, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Materialscientist. Katietalk 14:52, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – To prevent anon IPs from making joke edits. Vjmlhds 11:55, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:57, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Requesting the new 500 edits/30 days protection. Baking Soda (talk) 10:55, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

30/500 Done Laberkiste, any admin can apply it in an area (such as Israel-Palestine conflict) where ArbCom has authorised its use. BethNaught (talk) 14:49, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: This permanently semi-protected frequent target of disruption has been hit by several different autoconfirmed accounts today.--Cúchullain t/c 22:37, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Might benefit from WP:30/500 protection more, the accounts are autoconfirmed but fall way below the 30 days/500 posts threshold. tutterMouse (talk) 06:02, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That would work, as this is a Gamergate target. The disruption has continued today.--Cúchullain t/c 13:48, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done--Ymblanter (talk) 13:52, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Favre1fan93 (talk) 04:11, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 13:43, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 07:35, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected. only (talk) 11:49, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – Under {{ArbCom Arab-Israeli enforcement}} per talk page. — JJMC89(T·C) 11:33, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done A couple of the Telstra vandal's IPs blocked to. Acroterion (talk) 11:46, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template. Laber□T 14:14, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Only 120 transclusions. I think semi is sufficient MusikAnimal talk 04:16, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Used in highly visible template (Wikipedia:TPS/banner). Laber□T 14:15, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Same, only 120 translcusions MusikAnimal talk 04:16, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP harassment. clpo13(talk) 06:11, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I see there's a lot of it, and thank you for reverting, but Ian.thomson is an admin and is well aware he can semi the page if he wants to.[50] Bishonen | talk 06:41, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion by User:Cnslrken2. Binksternet (talk) 04:27, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 04:40, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion by User:Cnslrken2. Binksternet (talk) 04:27, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 04:33, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion by User:Cnslrken2. Binksternet (talk) 04:28, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 04:32, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Fancruft additions, which will likely continue if this is left unprotected. Snuggums (talk / edits) 17:13, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 18:03, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. High level of WP:SPA/IP disruption. Huge problem on these Safavid-related articles. Long-term protection should deal with this more adequately. - LouisAragon (talk) 20:11, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:03, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection. High level/Never-ending IP disruption. IP's are constantly changing his place of birth since quite a long time by now, even though the source clearly states that he was born somewhere else. This is going on for quite some time now. - LouisAragon (talk) 20:11, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:08, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:CombatMarshmallow, using multiple IPs from New Jersey. Binksternet (talk) 20:21, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Widr.. MelanieN (talk) 00:09, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring – Constant shifting backward and forward all over the sake of a hyphen. I am not party to which is the "correct version". Roy Howard Mills (talk) 20:43, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected indefinitely. MelanieN (talk) 00:13, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

18 April 2016

Semi-protection: Persistent IP reversion to silly edit. -- Scolaire (talk) 12:53, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 14:15, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. -©2016 Compassionate727(Talk)(Contributions) 12:54, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 14:15, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Vanity page created three times in last six months. —swpbT 18:09, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected MusikAnimal talk 18:20, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: repeated IP vandalism suggesting eminent, though unverifiable, format changes to radio station WSTK, which I do work for, and I can verify no format changes are coming. Whammy (talk) 12:58, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 14:14, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A number of recently created accounts have been vandalizing the page. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:12, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 14:14, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Constant and time-consuming vandalism from IPs. Grubbwashere (talk) 16:45, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:50, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism in the last 24 hours. Ttwaring (talk) 17:06, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 17:07, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: to enforce the 500 edit and 90 day requirement for users to have their names added to the list. Flow234 (talk) 11:17, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: completely unnecessary. The list is adequately maintained without protection and full protection would make the maintenance more difficult. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:23, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: - Two anon IPs are adding the same WP:BLP vios and promotional content, and edit-warring with two registered editors. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:08, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 14:12, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 15:53, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:09, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Music1201 talk 02:24, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Already pending changes protected. Widr (talk) 07:47, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Music1201 talk 02:35, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Already pending changes protected. Widr (talk) 07:47, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP hopper deleting material.VictoriaGraysonTalk 02:50, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 07:45, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: regular ongoing IP vandalism, particularly of his height and weight. LibStar (talk) 03:22, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 07:45, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism after recent release from protection period. 2601:1C0:4901:2191:ADAC:695E:A04B:2F5D (talk) 03:57, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 07:41, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Seems to be a target of a pro-Israel user, switching IPs. posting the same anti-Palestine posting which does not contribute to the talk page. 331dot (talk) 09:03, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I came here to report the same thing. Since 331dot's requested protection, it's been vandalised more than ten times, so I'd urge swift action. Jeppiz (talk) 10:08, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done

Semi-protection: Ongoing edit warring by IPs. Fourth time. Jim1138 (talk) 09:39, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 10:21, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Edit warring by IPs. Jim1138 (talk) 09:39, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 10:22, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Apparent socking semi-anon editor keeps removing information from the page for partisan reasons; they create new accounts and at least some of them have been blocked for vandalism on this page. Ogress 04:23, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 08:00, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism despite warnings. AkoAyMayLobo (talk) 05:09, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 07:59, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I have requested to previous protections (once for 6 months and then 1 year). All IP edits since most recent expiry (Good Friday 2016) have been un(de?)constructive and since it is a high visibility article it should be semi-protected indefinitely. Luxure Σ 08:59, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected Widr (talk) 09:09, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: At least two months of IP edits claiming that Cadbury Caramilk bars are "chocolate" bars rather than "candy" bars (as they are legally defined in Canada). No response to talk page discussion. Recent edits are probably one user since they all come from the same city, but they hop IPs quite a bit. Meters (talk) 22:28, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:19, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: There's been enough persistent recent IP/un-autoconfirmed vandalism that something needs to be done. Failing semi'ing, pending changes protection might also work... --IJBall (contribstalk) 23:11, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 07:56, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Harryhenry1 (talk) 23:14, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 07:54, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Controversial BLP material supported by court documents rather than WP:SECONDARY sources. Binksternet (talk) 02:23, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 07:48, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There is a socking tendentious editor who has yet to use the talk page, where actual discussion on the edits has been going on. Ogress 04:21, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 07:43, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 05:13, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:10, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – We should make sure this is not created again with improper use of copyrighted material. Laber□T 14:41, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for now. It's been recreated once. Hopefully somebody can give it an original thought or two. Katietalk 23:09, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: See previous request. Probable troll who is intentionally introducing factually incorrect information into the article. —DangerousJXD (talk) 19:43, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. Widr (talk) 19:50, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Widr, the page is only configured with pending changes. I think it warrants semi-protection. Then again, I think all pages warrant semi-protection. If you're saying that pending changes is enough for now then that's fine but your reply seems as though you think the page is already semi-protected. —DangerousJXD (talk) 20:41, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Pending changes is working fine. It's had exactly one edit since PC was applied, and remember that the IP can't see his own edit until it's approved (which must give them many, many angsts). :-) Katietalk 22:46, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection for seven months: Persistent Donald Trump-related IP vandalism.pbp 21:03, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 7 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
@Purplebackpack89: It seemed to me that pending-changes protection might be more appropriate here, because there are constructive and significant edits in late March from an anonymous IP address. If the PCP approval gets too burdensome, we can elevate to semi protection. ~Amatulić (talk) 04:44, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Renew pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Protecting administrator hasn't responded yet to my request at user talk page. --George Ho (talk) 20:23, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined We will see if further protection is needed after the current one expires. Widr (talk) 20:30, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed the issue. --George Ho (talk) 21:21, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Looks like one editor, on a constantly changing IP address, peppering the article with unsourced contributions - most being outright vandalism - consistently over the last couple of weeks. SubSeven (talk) 23:19, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Sergecross73. for two weeks. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:10, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mattspactalk 01:18, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The disruptive editing has been ongoing since 31 March and continued despite three periods of protection. I have watchlisted the page.Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:30, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Renew pending changes: Persistent vandalism. NeilN not active at the moment. George Ho (talk) 20:14, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined We will see if further protection is needed after the current one expires. Widr (talk) 20:28, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Renew pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Protecting administrator not active at the moment. --George Ho (talk) 20:24, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined We will see if further protection is needed after the current one expires. Widr (talk) 20:28, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Ongoing IP vandalism. KGirlTrucker87 (talk) 00:49, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. User page also protected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:55, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Two unregistred IPs, Special:Contributions/117.224.201.82 and Special:Contributions/59.91.232.125 keep adding unsourced claims and removing curation tags without addressing issues. JamesG5 (talk) 05:37, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:29, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Lets have 2 weeks of gold lock so that edit warring can come to a halt without blocks. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 10:21, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:38, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Sixth of March 10:43, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Semi protection would not be effective, because the warring participants are mostly confirmed accounts. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:43, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP edit warring and content removal. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 06:52, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 23:08, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Adding fake detailes by anonymous users. Therobinw (talk) 18:56, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 18:58, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. An IP has been redirecting the user page of an indef blocked user to the Main Page. clpo13(talk) 21:49, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Katietalk 22:41, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP hopping vandalism, 107.192.145.163 was recently blocked for 6 months .[51], it looks like the user jumped IPs to evade it. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 16:00, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 16:35, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been vandalised over the last few days by a number of IP users. Can we please protect this page to stop is happening again? . Gbawden (talk) 17:14, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Widr (talk) 17:31, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request to semi-protect. Anonymous IP keeps replacing "as of (date)" template with the word "currently". I've explained to him more than once that "currently" is unhelpful as it doesn't indicate how up to date the article is, but he just keeps doing it and is now acting in bad faith (see recent edit history). Richard75 (talk) 20:58, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 22:34, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf (talk) 22:11, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 22:39, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

19 April 2016

Semi-protection: Repeated IP vandalism in changing school name to offensive languages Lyg 2001 (talk) 11:20, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 16:43, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Not the first or last time this high level article will be vandalised. Qed237 (talk) 13:47, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 16:42, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism since the beginning of 2016.Pierre cb (talk) 16:22, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Widr (talk) 16:37, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated violation of NPOV rule and non revert rule by user 96.8.243.197. Edit war underway.

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 16:46, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP deletions of content.Carlossuarez46 (talk) 18:40, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 19:40, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: An IP address has effectively taken over this article and turned it into a pro-Lauck promotion piece. I have neither the time nor the energy for a war with this person so it needs to be protected or even deleted as rightnow it'sofno value whatsoever. Keresaspa (talk) 19:18, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 19:47, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Slow motion IP-driven edit war. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:08, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 18:11, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Three Borcker sock accounts in 24 hours, low traffic article otherwise. McGeddon (talk) 17:51, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 17:54, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Renew pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Occasional occurrence. Protecting administrator not active at this time. George Ho (talk) 18:14, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Biblio (talk) 18:42, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf (talk) 04:08, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As a note might want to PP Vignesh Anand as well. Wgolf (talk) 04:09, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Creation protected MusikAnimal talk 16:36, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Renew pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Only one edit was accepted; other edits by IPs have been reverted. This occurred almost twice a day. Protecting administrator hasn't responded yet. --George Ho (talk) 06:34, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 16:37, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High risk of repeated IP vandalism (from 2013 to present) delicated in changing school name to obscene native languages (i.e. Lan Jiao).Lyg 2001 (talk) 09:24, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 09:29, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Lots of BLP violations via IPs, adding unsourced birth date/location, etc. Due to current movie release a protection for 3-6 months may be required. Denniss (talk) 10:22, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:44, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism Repeating vandalism by users Taquim . 204.11.75.182 (talk) 12:54, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected by Ian.thomson for 3 days. tutterMouse (talk) 15:05, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. David Biddulph (talk) 15:26, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:41, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The usual disruption that never end on these continental articles. Qed237 (talk) 15:55, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:40, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism on a high profile continental tournament. Qed237 (talk) 15:56, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:39, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Non-stop disruption and POV edits by various IPs. Zyma (talk) 16:18, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:38, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 05:21, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 07:36, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection for a month: High visibility, prone to vandalism. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 06:42, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 07:35, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Unfolding events concerning the dismissal of the leadsinger. Two camps have been editing the page since it was announced and added personal information and BLP related material. Legal action concerning the dusmissal is on going. Requesting 24 hour page protection. Karst (talk) 08:22, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 09:09, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. 2601:1C0:4901:2191:D8F5:6A49:464C:20B5 (talk) 22:55, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MusikAnimal talk 01:43, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IP users. Page has been semi-protected three times now but issue persists. – Nick Mitchell 98 talk 03:40, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 07:44, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:4901:2191:6576:F78A:E2E9:A34 (talk) 03:46, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 07:42, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive edits by IPs and IP-hopping since 21 Dec 2015. Zyma (talk) 05:24, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:39, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: article has been vandalized almost twenty times in 2016 by various unregistered users—article is for a living politician and current head of state. --Akhenaten0 (talk) 19:59, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Widr (talk) 20:01, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm new at this—I don't think I was clear. There have been a long series of vandalism edits from various and seemingly unconnected IP addresses, none of which are logged in accounts. I can't start arbitration if the users haven't created accounts, right? --Akhenaten0 (talk) 20:10, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Akhenaten0: IPs can be blocked if needed, although they are rarely indefinitely blocked. FiendYT 00:58, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-vandalism of article under WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. Huldra (talk) 20:47, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The subject itself is not unambiguously about the Arab-Israeli conflict, and vandalism is infrequent MusikAnimal talk 01:24, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Edit warring, with no compromise in sight. The present version of the page shows unacceptable bias. Iain07 (talk) 21:28, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Page hasn't been edited in nearly a week, and the edit warring doesn't seem that out of hand. Try to seek consensus, and report edit warriors to WP:ANEW if needed MusikAnimal talk 01:26, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Edit warring, with no compromise in sight. The present version of the page shows unacceptable bias. This article and the Sayers article (above) are closely related. The two must agree. Iain07 (talk) 21:28, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. This page hasn't been touched in over a month... and further back in history I see very little back-and-forth editing outside reverting vandalism MusikAnimal talk 01:27, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – constant vandalism from 182 series ip. - Managerarc talk 20:32, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SQLQuery me! 03:27, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Different IPs adding controversial information and edit-warring. Laber□T 22:10, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SQLQuery me! 03:28, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent edit warring by IP's over the last few days. Requesting based on this ANI thread Blackmane (talk) 02:18, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SQLQuery me! 03:30, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 2601:1C0:4901:2191:6576:F78A:E2E9:A34 (talk) 03:13, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SQLQuery me! 03:30, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:4901:2191:F161:4A49:4CF8:45DD (talk) 00:44, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 01:47, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:4901:2191:F161:4A49:4CF8:45DD (talk) 00:44, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 01:48, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – If you take a look at the editor history, most of the edits are undos and reverts. It is a constant battleground by disruptive editors and vandalists and the vandal-fighters. Requesting Pending Changes Review to allow reviewers to check for non-sourced content towards this highly controversial case. FiendYT 00:55, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 01:49, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Wackyike (talk) 01:20, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 01:50, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Page keeps getting edited in an attempt to change the name (which is controversial). This lets edits happen but only let in non-controversial ones. Paris1127 (talk) 01:44, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 01:51, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Globe Trekker (talk) 21:05, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. MusikAnimal talk 21:30, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Given that this module for creating sports table has now gained widespread use over several different sports, I think it would be good to have it protected as well as submodules. At least indef semi-protection. It involves main articles and submodules Module:Sports table/WDL, Module:Sports table/WL, Module:Sports table/WL OT, Module:Sports table/WL OTL tiebreak and Module:Sports table/sub. Qed237 (talk) 21:48, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected Enough transclusions to warrant template protection. A few of the submodules I only semi'd MusikAnimal talk 01:33, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf (talk) 21:48, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator SuperMarioMan. MusikAnimal talk 01:34, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:4901:2191:D8F5:6A49:464C:20B5 (talk) 23:14, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 01:44, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism (see [52]) by IPs claiming she died. Quis separabit? 23:20, 18 April 2016 (UTC) -- my bad; she did die. Sorry. Quis separabit? 23:27, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This still needs to be semi-protected because of IP vandalism. Aspects (talk) 00:35, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 01:35, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP vandalism throughout March and April. Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 23:37, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 01:36, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I would request page protection for at least a month. There have been several instances of vandalism and NPOV violations in the past several days. MB298 (talk) 23:46, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 01:37, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several instances of recent vandalism. MB298 (talk) 23:49, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 01:38, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – No need for vandals to edit it. User request. –Qpalzmmzlapq T C 23:49, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected MusikAnimal talk 01:39, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Andy W. (talk · contrib) 23:53, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator MelanieN. MusikAnimal talk 01:39, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Andy W. (talk · contrib) 00:05, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator MelanieN. MusikAnimal talk 01:40, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator MelanieN. MusikAnimal talk 01:41, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing from IPs and new users. Maybe a sockpuppet. Gottagotospace (talk) 00:15, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 01:41, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Music1201 talk 00:35, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 01:45, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP has been adding numerous non-notable names to this list, as well as some unknown numbers. Due to jumping IPv6 attempts at communication or warnings cannot be discussed. ☾Loriendrew☽ (ring-ring) 00:39, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 01:46, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full-protection: Persistent edit warring - editor continously restoring the article to their preferred version with little talk page activity. Protect page to encourage discussion. 31.49.133.154 (talk) 18:02, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Two users involved. Warned and will monitor the situation MusikAnimal talk 18:17, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Page is currently pending-changes protected after problems with an IP-hopping 2606:6000:* editor (see this ANI), but really needs to be semi'd. The problem isn't the introduction of bad IP content that needs checking first, it's one IP-hopping user WP:OWNingly reverting anything that they don't 100% agree with. McGeddon (talk) 18:28, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging Widr MusikAnimal talk 18:43, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Their reverts won't become visible, though, unless someone accepts them. Widr (talk) 18:48, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Widr:But if someone rejects the edit, the IP will revert it "back" (and this has just happened). From the perspective of the editors patrolling the page, it's the same old edit warring.
(Is there a more constructive way to handle this than by protecting the article? If this user had a registered account, they'd have been forced to change their edit warring instincts or get blocked, by now - but as a hopping IP they can just rack up another ANI discussion or warning for edit warring and switch to a new IP the next day without even having to blank their talk page. It looks like they may have joined briefly as User:Wwwma the last time that Generation Z got semi-protected, but faded back to multiple IPs.) --McGeddon (talk) 19:18, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for 2 weeks now. Widr (talk) 19:27, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: There's no reason why an article should be indefinitely fully protected. If it must be protected indefinitely, then either semi, 30/500, or PC2. —cyberpowerChat:Limited Access 18:57, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Paging Kudpung. Kudpung to aisle 3. Katietalk 20:47, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@KrakatoaKatie:. If Cyberpower678 is prepared to find time to watch the article round the clock and be sure to remove the constant stream unwanted additions to it, then I have no objection to it being unprotected. Perhaps a review of its history and talkk page archives will help to understand the situation. . Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:41, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Glancing over it, it would seem the biggest problem is that people keep adding non-notable/unsourced social networking sites. Looking closer at edit requests, those that get approved, are experienced editors, while those that don't, are new/anon editors. I would say 30/500 protection is sufficient for not having to deal with reviewing edits, and that PC2 is sufficient if we want to enable reviewing edits.—cyberpowerChat:Online 01:51, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Well, we can do neither of those for this article as it stands now. The options are you watch it and revert the disruptive edits, or we leave it as is. Up to you. Katietalk 01:58, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Wasn't PC2 approved for use at some point? I occasionally see my bot tagging articles with the PC2 tag.—cyberpowerChat:Limited Access 03:38, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It's enabled technically, but there's no consensus how to use it. There's a newish RFC about it that's not drawing any interest but I think that's because nobody knows about it. Katietalk 16:56, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I would pefer 30/500 protection instead of other protections, I currently can't edit on 30/500 because of a low edit count. KGirlTrucker87 (talk) 01:44, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
So why can't we use 30/500 protection? It seems like the perfect protection level to keep this article in check.—cyberpowerChat:Offline 05:07, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Because the policy, which was decided by an RfC, states that 30/500 ay only be used in topic areas authorised by ArbCom or the community. So far the community has not made any authorisations, and AFAIK social networks are not under any ArbCom sanctions. BethNaught (talk) 14:46, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ah right. Since the community has the power to authorize this restriction, I'll raise it over at AN.—cyberpowerChat:Online 14:53, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion started here.—cyberpowerChat:Online 15:03, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Seeing as the discussion has moved to a new venue, should this just be procedurally be declined? tutterMouse (talk) 15:30, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined (procedural) Katietalk 16:07, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

20 April 2016

Full-protection: Keeps reverting. I keep telling them WP:LISTPEOPLE and how they are doing lists wrong. Only response I've ever gotten is I'm not qualified to edit the page. Bgwhite (talk) 20:20, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Seems to have stopped. Report to WP:ANEW if they continue MusikAnimal talk 16:48, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Laber□T 16:23, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 16:25, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Just got sent off in a football derby in England after hard tackle. Vandalism from angry fans. . Qed237 (talk) 20:19, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 20:51, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeated creation of spam about a non-notable person. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:30, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Widr (talk) 20:52, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: repeated introduction of unsourced WP:BLP by IP anon. Dual Freq (talk) 20:55, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 20:57, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 14:36, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Widr (talk) 14:54, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – per 206.176.21.38's edit summary : (we wont stop editing this page.). Mduvekot (talk) 18:40, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. Widr (talk) 19:02, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – edit-warring. Laber□T 18:53, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:03, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Cryptic tweet unconfirmed reports, causing edit overload. Needs to be halted. Those stating retired have nt contribute to discussion. Murry1975 (talk) 10:23, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 18:39, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.  StarScream1007  ►Talk  16:35, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:41, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – This category has consistently been recreated, having to be brought to CfD a number of times now. Hoping protection will help with this. Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:43, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Widr (talk) 16:46, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Laber□T 15:08, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Widr (talk) 16:17, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Autobiography. Laber□T 15:08, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Widr (talk) 16:16, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Laber□T 15:48, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:11, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request temporary semi-protection, please keep the full-move-protection, due to ongoing vandalism from multiple IPs. Thank you. — Cirt (talk) 16:00, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:13, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs apparently think "Tommy Joe Shartins" (and sharting in general) is funny. NFLisAwesome (ZappaOMati) 16:01, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:14, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – requested only a few days ago, I think, but was denied. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 13:13, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 14:00, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, original research, addition of unsourced content, ETC. It feels like I have to revert editors more than once on a daily basis. DarkKnight2149 14:29, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 14:54, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Borcker (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). GABHello! 14:49, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 14:53, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IPs keep adding text implying Park is in a relationship with his fellow band member, which is not the case. Random86 (talk) 10:30, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 10:43, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anon IP vandalism. Karst (talk) 10:46, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 10:50, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some want him sacked, others don't. Fighting it out on this article with over 50 POV/vandalism/speculation edits/reverts in last 3 days. Escape Orbit (Talk) 11:58, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 12:29, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protect: repeat IP vandalism (see [53]). Quis separabit? 00:03, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 05:59, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Laber□T 00:14, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 05:56, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some sort of slow-burn IP edit war over a single sentence that's been going on for a few weeks. Grayfell (talk) 05:29, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Widr (talk) 05:44, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
According to some of the IPs this is a sock or proxy issue. 177.55.253.68 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) and 109.232.106.142 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) have made the exact same edits and were both blocked as proxies. Several other IPs have made this edit as well, but I cannot find any SPI or similar. Grayfell (talk) 06:03, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther :  Talk  00:55, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 05:55, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – An IP hopping anon is trying to push their own agenda on the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:30, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Widr (talk) 05:47, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Content removal by different new users. Laber□T 06:36, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 07:57, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Long term semi-protection: Persistent and recurring vandalism by same person with ever shifting IP, based St.-Petersburg. See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Physics#Strange things at Minimum total potential energy principle and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Antichristos. IP-based SPI-case is going nowhere, so long term semi might solve this. DVdm (talk) 07:02, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 07:54, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP, was recent subject of some jokes on the TAZ show. In spite of request by show's host to NOT do this, page is still getting vandalized. . AddWittyNameHere (talk) 22:00, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 06:09, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing vandalism since July 2013, usually from the 75.120.X.X range. The edits are too numerous to list so I will list just one from each month since it started to prove that it is persistent campaign: July 2013; August 2013; September 2013; February 2014; March 2014; April 2014; May 2014; July 2014; October 2014; December 2014; protected January-April 2015; May 2015; June 2015; October 2015; November 2015; December 2015; January 2016; March 2016; April 2016; the most recent. This is just a sample and it barely scratches the surface. The page has already been protected four times because of this asshole so I think we need to consider a more permanent solution. Betty Logan (talk) 22:38, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 06:04, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:4901:2191:1D5E:CC5C:E0F3:BC32 (talk) 22:40, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 06:02, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Borcker. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 23:16, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 06:01, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP activity trying to reintroduce dated and unsourced content + content which WP:FAILEDVERIFICATION. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 23:38, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 06:00, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 03:25, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 05:14, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: This article is about an observance that takes place today (April 20), so unsurprisingly, vandalism has started on the article, and it will surely increase in a few hours when people start waking up in North America. —Granger (talk · contribs) 05:44, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 05:53, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – With all the news on Johnny Manziel's off-season transgressions, it's safe to say that this BLP article will continue to be a vandal magnet for the foreseeable future...six-month protection recommended. DPH1110 (talk) 05:49, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 05:52, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. LG-Gunther :  Talk  00:54, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Acroterion (talk) 03:28, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Magnet for vandalism. At least three months (by then, the movie will be out) protection might do.Crboyer (talk) 02:19, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's see how it does after a month, I'm reluctant to protect for longer. Acroterion (talk) 03:26, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor 98.204.183.125 has been rather disruptive since March 11. They were blocked again today for 2 years by Acroterion (apparently this is a long pattern of abuse stretching back to 2014 on this page). A mere 41 minutes after the block another IP (71.163.231.62) starts editing in the same manner. Both IPs geolocate to Virginia (the first to Arlington, the second to Alexandria). Requesting indefinitely protection (but would be okay with a lengthy temporary one too). . EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 03:05, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm going with a short term to see what happens. This has been going on since maybe 2009. It can be extended if needed. Acroterion (talk) 03:22, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

21 April 2016

Temporary full protection: Reports of death, nothing confirmed. Thechased (talk) 17:01, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Sky News has it confirmed from his publicist. Katietalk 17:21, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 21:21, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 21:24, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 21:21, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 21:23, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. Laber□T 16:44, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 16:58, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Laber□T 16:53, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 16:55, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors have repeatedly changed Wachowski Brothers to Wachowskis despite ongoing discussion at talk. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 17:29, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 21:03, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated block evasion/IP hopping by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Atomic Meltdown. Nymf (talk) 18:40, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 21:00, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:23, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 20:59, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Randy Quaid- URGENT

Semi-protection: High level of persistant IP vandalism. I tried to make suitable edits last night, and they have all been deleted by anonymous editors. Fireflyfanboy (talk) 20:27, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

EDIT: anonymous editors keep changing article, urgent assistance is needed!Fireflyfanboy (talk) 20:57, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 20:58, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jdcomix (talk) 16:18, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. MusikAnimal talk 16:25, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP keeps adding undue material on controversial views. Strongly suspect that the IP is either a meatpuppet or sockpuppet as (a) they restored text that was removed from the article back in December last year word-for-word, and (b) are familiar with Wikipedia terminology such as TLDR. Number 57 16:29, 21 April 2016 (UTC) Haha, since when has TLDR been exclusive to Wikiedia? http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=tl%3Bdr / http://www.internetslang.com/TLDR-meaning-definition.asp — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.154.254.204 (talk) 17:03, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of half a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:45, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jdcomix (talk) 16:37, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 16:42, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. – Keeps on getting recreated under here since Vignesh Anand (film editor) is page protected now. Wgolf (talk) 17:24, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to put a speedy on this one also, but you really can't do a db-person on this misused space. Wgolf (talk) 17:30, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done kelapstick(bainuu) 20:41, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing persistent pattern of vandalism with the same edits made by different IP addresses. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:10, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done also some PC1 BethNaught (talk) 20:18, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: This articles subject is purported to be a witness to the Armenian Genocide whose nomination for deletion occurred on the same day that The Wall Street Journal allowed to be published a full-page ad denying this historical event occurred.[54] There is no allegation being made that these two events are in anyway connected, however, with a subject like this (and as I’ve suggested in the deletion discussion), and in spite of the issues this article has, I believe it deserves a more complete examination by experts familiar with this subject before any final determination is made. Thanks. Picomtn (talk) 13:44, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 14:36, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute and persistent vandalism due to upcoming 2016 Philippine Presidential Elections come May 9. User:Mclovin'toshtalk 4:14, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 14:39, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – WP:BDP issues - vandals taking it to the talk page instead. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 17:35, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 17:39, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Socking per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Borcker, two accounts and one IP in two days. McGeddon (talk) 17:55, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 18:00, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Blocked user continue to uses talk page to vandalize. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:45, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Widr (talk) 18:47, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Peter Sam Fan 15:37, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 16:10, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent disruptive WP:POV and WP:BLP-violating editing. Plot Spoiler (talk) 16:03, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 16:13, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Number of IP users (may be same person) repeatedly adding false, joke, information. Escape Orbit (Talk) 16:26, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:59, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Laber□T 16:45, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Widr (talk) 16:56, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. GABHello! 19:40, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, there is apparently one user editing against consensus, and in this case full protection would be inefficient.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:57, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 13:38, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 13:43, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 13:59, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 14:35, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. MB298 (talk) 01:43, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 07:16, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 03:08, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: The vandalism seems to be only by one user (172.56.29.248), the user should be blocked instead of page protection. Music1201 talk 03:34, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 07:35, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: The original reason for protecting was because of page-move vandalism, although only 1 user moved the page and the user is now blocked. Music1201 talk 04:43, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I guess the question is why remove it, it isn't doing anything by being there and it's not like we have a finite number of pagemove protection locks we need to be cautious about giving out. tutterMouse (talk) 07:02, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not done The vandal in question is a well-known sockpuppeteer (or at any rate, a sockpuppeteer, not sure which) so the block doesn't solve anything. Also we tend not to act on requests for userspace un/protection which are not from the user concerned. BethNaught (talk) 07:15, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Too many overly anxious fans adding their favorite team to this player's profile before the 2016 NFL draft. Please semi-protect until May 1 (which is when the NFL draft ends). bender235 (talk) 02:40, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 06:59, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 03:03, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 06:59, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: The Confederacy was very important to US History,so its good to protect the article,especially to avoid vandalism. Pedro8790 (talk) 03:49, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 06:57, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: This page is about a celebrity family and seems to be suffering the effects of an influx of fanboy editors. It has attracted repeated, undiscussed blanking of sourced content, often content that is under active RfC debate. LavaBaron (talk) 18:11, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 02:20, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
MelanieN, sorry for the bother, but can you check the page again since you last viewed it? Things are getting a little out of hand. We have two editors doing a tag-team blanking of half the article to avoid 3RR and I've reached my limit so can't do anything more without crossing the line. This blanking is being done to content that is being actively discussed in RfC. Thanks. LavaBaron (talk) 06:10, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Since the article appeared on the main page as a DYK, there have been numerous complaints by a variety of editors that it has a blatantly hostile POV. The quotes and other material seem to have been cherry-picked to attack living people such as the Queen herself. As it's her 90th birthday, this is a high-profile insult and, per WP:BLP, we need to clean this up immediately. LavaBaron seems to be violating WP:OWN by clinging to his partisan view of the matter. My vision is a more dispassionate and historical treatment, such as we find in the book Royal Education: Past, Present, and Future, which starts with the Tudors like Queen Elizabeth I. Andrew D. (talk) 06:19, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Okay:
  • (A) The fact it's a celebrity's birthday is not a reason to blank content on WP which said celeb may find unflattering. The fact you are advancing this as an argument is absolutely flabbergasting. RfCs run for 30 days whether it's a celebrity's birthday or not. There is not a procedure for "Fast-Track RfCs in Event of Celebrity B-Day."
  • (B) It is a patent lie there have been "numerous complaints by a variety of editors." You and one other editor are blanking a section that is currently running 2-2 to delete/keep in a RfC.
  • (C) As you have repeatedly been told, you should feel free to introduce additional sources you've found. You should not feel free to repeatedly blank half the article just because you don't like that a consensus has not developed to obfuscate that material. Blanking huge sections appears to be the sole method you plan on contributing to this article.
  • (D) BLP does not prohibit the introduction of content about a living person that is less than celebratory. Your partisanship is glaring that you think analysis made by qualified sources in reputable publications regarding a politician's educational credentials rises to a BLP violation.
LavaBaron (talk) 06:25, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note that other editors who have commented positively on the article's POV include Vanamonde93, Anne Delong, Neutrality, Firebrace, and others. Note that the issue of the colors was resolved long ago; claiming some kind-of disagreement on this point seems deceptive at best. Note also that Andrew is quick to accuse me of partisanship, cherry-picking, lodging attacks against living people, and denying the existence of words. These personal attacks seem to be classic ownership behaviour. By contrast, blanking 7,000 bytes three times in a single day, when all information contained therein is cited to RS and the entire section is the subject of an active RfC being discussed by the community, objectively meets our WP:VANDALISM definition and cannot, therefore, be a "personal attack".
I hope you decide to come to the table and begin cooperatively editing this article, Andrew, instead of repeatedly blanking it because "it's her [the Queen's] 90th birthday" [sic]. Thanks - LavaBaron (talk) 06:59, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • On the issue of colours, I edited the page just an hour ago to remove garish colours from a table. The page still has that change but that edit is so recent that it may still be a live issue. I have no plans to edit the page further today as we should now hear from the many other editors involved. Andrew D. (talk) 07:14, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
On the issue of colors, I'm aware you blanked the entire table during one of your "sweeps" of the page. Fortunately, Firebrace kindly removed the colors, cautiously and surgically, for which we've thanked him. I agree all edits to the page should cease while the RfCs work their way through to consensus over the next several weeks, whether "it's her [the Queen's] 90th birthday" [sic] or not. LavaBaron (talk)
Yes, as I said, Firebrace removed the colors [55], for which we thanked him. If you also tried to remove the colors, your edit may have been undone when another editor was trying to undo your blanking of 900 words of text like here [56] (among numerous other places). We should not engage in wholesale destruction and evisceration of hundreds of words of sourced knowledge even if "it's her [the Queen's] 90th birthday" [sic], right? (I could be wrong, I'm not entirely familiar with WP's lese majeste policies.) LavaBaron (talk) 07:27, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • @LavaBaron: Protect because "This page is about a celebrity family", but don't blank content because "The fact it's a celebrity's birthday is not a reason to blank content"? You're utterly confused. For the record, I have said nothing positive about the article, which I believe should be deleted as not-notable or merged into the various royal biographies. Firebrace (talk) 07:29, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If you believe the page should be deleted, we should resolve that question immediately. I'll file an AfD. LavaBaron (talk) 07:33, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • LavaBaron's tin ear for appropriate article content is apparent from the article as he originally nominated it for DYK [57] -- it opened (opened!) thus"
The education of the British Royal Family is the method and extent of formal education received by members of the British Royal Family. The royal family of the United Kingdom is not known for its intellectual achievements and the British constitutional scholar David Starkey has described the reigning queen, Elizabeth II, as poorly educated, comparing her cultural refinement and intellectual curiosity to that of a "housewife".
The RPP is his attempt to regain control of the page so he can force in more tripe like that. This isn't about "material less than celebratory" but rather SYNTH, UNDUE, cherrypicking, and inappropriate tone. and numerous editors have expressed concern, either through talkpage comments or direct editing of the article.
Furthermore, any time a particular article is likely to attract an especially large number of views (as around the subject's birthday) it's entirely appropriate to apply heightened scrutiny, with heightened urgency, to potential BLP concerns. The idea that the article should be full (!) protected might charitably be called delusional. EEng 07:37, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I see now that LavaBaron, consistent with his habit of opening multiple RfCs simultaneously on the same article at the drop of a hat, has now opened an AfD on his own article. This is ridiculous. The subject is obviously notable, and this is just more of LavaBaron jumping on his horse and riding off in all directions. EEng 07:41, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The quotation you provided were not my words, they are a paraphrase of content sourced from RS. I'm sorry you don't like what RS says, but that's not really my problem. LavaBaron (talk) 07:41, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No, your problem is that you don't understand how to write a balanced article free of UNDUE, SYNTH, cherrypicking, and shock schlock. My complaint isn't that that opinion is included (somewhere), but rather that it's at the very opening of the article, as a flat statement of fact, with no context, qualification, or attribution. EEng 07:55, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Another lie, Andrew? As you know, I posted to other WikiProjects after your compatriot selectively posted only to WikiProjects like "WikiProject Royalty" to summon more fanboys. Posting neutral notices to "WikiProject Politics" - what I did - was a balancing of existing canvassing. Again, we don't destroy knowledge on WP because "it's her [the Queen's] 90th birthday". [58] LavaBaron (talk) 16:07, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Everyone involved please take it to the talkpage if you want to discuss it, this isn't the place to do it though. tutterMouse (talk) 12:10, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – There are IPs that add unsourced (which is "future" contents), and one that reverts vandalisms. 333-blue 23:04, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:55, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Snuggums (talk / edits) 00:10, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. MusikAnimal talk 04:43, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 00:36, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 07:24, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 00:40, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 07:21, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Violations of the biographies of living persons policy. NinthTail (talk) 03:44, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 07:37, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - ✈Sunnya343✈ (talk) 01:04, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 07:19, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection for 7 days: Persistent vandalism due to current events in Hong Kong--1233thehongkonger (talk) 01:38, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 07:17, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – disruptive/vandalism. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 02:11, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 07:15, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Lotta ip editing back and forth over pronouns because of tumblr post. See article talk page. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 04:18, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 06:56, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – pr WP:ARBPIA3#500/30: vandalism by "new" users. Huldra (talk) 04:43, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done exrended confirmed protected. BethNaught (talk) 07:17, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Band was the subject of a recent social media hoax involving a purported 4/20 concert at a random gas station in Dayton, Ohio, thus IP vandals are trying to add references to it. ViperSnake151  Talk  05:24, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 06:54, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Prevent this article from being created per WP:NTOUR until sufficient information and reliable sources come about. Interlude 65 (Push to talk) 20:26, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. The article exists. It apparently was created a few hours after your request. If you think it shouldn't exist, take it to WP:AFD. In any case, we would not create-protect a title like this; that function is used for articles that have been created and recreated multiple times. MelanieN (talk) 02:29, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:08, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 02:30, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – I nominated this list for deletion, but article owners keep removing the AfD tag. jps (talk) 23:23, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I also explained to the two editors, who apparently thought it was OK to remove an AfD tag. MelanieN (talk) 02:58, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Highly visible page. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 17:35, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Not sure why this is highly visible, but either way the move log is empty so I don't see any justification for move protection MusikAnimal talk 19:18, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Edit-warring, probable BLP violations. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:55, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined No edits to this page in a week MusikAnimal talk 19:17, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: An unidentified user (IP address) keeps adding non-sourced material to the page and also material that is sourced, but has nothing to do with the page's subject. I asked him to discuss it on Talk page twice, but he ignored it. I have the feeling this is the beginning of an edit-war.Clausgroi (talk) 22:13, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:36, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: A wide array of IPs (at least some of whom appear to be used by the same vandal) have been vandalizing this high school article throughout the past two days, repeatedly recharacterizing it as "Bed Bug High" and the like. Julietdeltalima (talk) 23:49, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:39, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

22 April 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 16:33, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 16:56, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: This article need protection. There are so many who are making edits on personal opinions. Edits must be neutral but I can't see that in this scenario. GreenCricket (talk) 16:47, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 16:56, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems to be an attempt at humour or self-publicity. William Avery (talk) 20:44, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 20:50, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs keep adding unsourced information on sexual services. -- The Voidwalker Discuss 20:59, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 21:03, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. FrB.TG (talk) 14:51, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 15:06, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP editor is insisting on adding apparent incendiary material about this subject using a primary source instead of the usual wide secondary reporting that would indicate it being proper for inclusion. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 17:59, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:16, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection Insertion of incorrect info has resumed after the last protection has expired. I am new to this problem editor but there is some info about them here User talk:Davey2010#List of Friday Download episodes. MarnetteD|Talk 18:10, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:17, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by IP - see Special:Contributions/Ferociouslettuce. VQuakr (talk) 18:55, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:15, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Ongoing vandalism (some hopping IPs) in adding false un-sourced information to the article. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 12:59, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 14:06, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – also addition of unneeded csd templates. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 14:38, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 14:43, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: user request. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 14:39, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Zppix: Pending changes is only for the mainspace, but we can semi your user page if you want MusikAnimal talk 14:44, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@MusikAnimal: That would be fine --Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 17:46, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected MusikAnimal talk 17:55, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf (talk) 18:02, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Katietalk 18:41, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On the page: Prince Rogers Nelson

Change:

#REDIRECT [[Prince (musician)]]

To:

#REDIRECT [[Prince (musician)]]

{{R from birth name}}

Please note: the edit page redirects here. Ping me back. Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 17:04, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Katietalk 18:49, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Controversial subject matter with a recurring and high level of IP vandalism and disruptive editing (most recently on 1 March, 12 April, 19 April, 21 April (twice), and 22 April). What looks like many practitioners of this religion like to edit the page to push their own particular interpretation of it, usually without recourse to any reliable sourcing. Some engage in edit warring to prevent their additions being removed; very few ever take the issue to the talk page. Midnightblueowl (talk) 16:23, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:57, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. 4 instances in the last day. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:27, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 17:41, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 17:28, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 17:40, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 17:30, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 17:39, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: User request - semi-frequently vandalised and using a stroke of genius by Writ Keeper to update via a JS file only me and admins can edit, explained at User talk:Floquenbeam. Mike1901 (talk) 12:12, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Let me know if you change your mind. Widr (talk) 12:15, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection due to the controversial nature of the topic and high level of IPs pushing their own POV and original research.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 14:05, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 14:07, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs repeatedly removing large section of text; no attempts to discuss. DonIago (talk) 15:13, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 15:21, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: To prevent this from being recreated again despite consensus to delete after both AFD's, it would help if this was salted. Snuggums (talk / edits) 15:17, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Bishonen | talk 15:21, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: For possible future vandalism during actual election period. Requesting protection until election period is done. Babymissfortune 06:54, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Widr (talk) 07:32, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: For possible future vandalism during actual election period. Requesting protection until election period is done. Babymissfortune 07:07, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Widr (talk) 07:36, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: For possible future vandalism during actual election period. Requesting protection until election period is done. . Babymissfortune 07:11, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Widr (talk) 07:36, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – IP:193.60.234.210 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) (also using IP:193.60.234.209 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)) is making edits to existing text on Wow! signal page without giving any reason. Has long passed 3RR in a 24hr period, has been blocked for 24hrs and immediately made the same alteration. Refuses to accept consensus from five different editors, including 2 admins: is making personal attacks against editors. David J Johnson (talk) 08:54, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 08:58, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Someone wanted to ignore the consensus on the requested move (RM) eight years ago... Actually, the decision was ignored, so someone else reinserted the diacritics a few or several times. George Ho (talk) 09:44, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Widr (talk) 10:21, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of IP hopping individual adding unsourced information and quotes. Optakeover(U)(T)(C) 11:31, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 11:32, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – This page appears to be related to the GamerGate controversy. Peter Sam Fan 18:22, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • information Administrator note Please note that outside the Arab-Israeli conflict, 30/500 protection is only currently available as a discretionary sanction and the procedures must be followed accordingly. BethNaught (talk) 18:28, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@BethNaught: Yes, but from what I have seen, anything related to the Gamergate controversy should be 30/500 protected. Am I wrong? Peter Sam Fan 18:31, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. WP:ARBGG did not authorise a blanket 30/500 restriction as in WP:ARBPIA3. BethNaught (talk) 18:32, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Widr (talk) 05:08, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Messing up the article. Contains unexpected people which doesn't related to this show. Hamham31Heke!KushKush! 21:54, 21 April 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 05:06, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 05:04, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP keeps adding non-regular member to member list. Mlpearc (open channel) 03:00, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 04:51, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Popular classical music composer with far too much disruptive editing. The history of the article itself says so. Lots of "reverted edits" or "undid revision" or similar. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 08:41, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 08:46, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 21:49, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I, JethroBT drop me a line 01:25, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – We seem to have a couple new IP's (89.7.200.28, 81.82.53.170) changing a sourced stat without giving a new source as to why. Hopefully a week will stop the mischief. Fyunck(click) (talk) 05:31, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 05:50, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism due to broadway musical Hamilton. Requesting protection until furor has died down slightly. Jonk382 (talk) 07:34, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:36, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Contentious edits continue to be made and reverted while the talk page discussion going on, including an RfC. Kautilya3 (talk) 07:36, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:38, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent and increasingly frequent removal of well-sourced content by IP-hopper. Long term. going back almost 3 three years. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 23:09, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 05:05, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:22, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 05:03, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 01:22, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 05:02, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:35, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Widr (talk) 04:52, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:14, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Widr (talk) 04:52, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sock puppetry, again. Antique RoseDrop me a line 03:15, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 04:50, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IPs and account have been trying to promote the commercial site baramatiworld.com on this page. Semi-protecting the page should prevent some of this edit-warring. Dhrm77 (talk) 03:59, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 04:50, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 22:05, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. kelapstick(bainuu) 22:09, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism by various IPs DVdm (talk) 22:35, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 02:17, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP-hopping vandal continues to put in "Dark toreador red is still the slowest color" multiple times a day. Bahooka (talk) 23:00, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 02:19, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems to currently be a vandalism target since Prince (musician) just passed away. Probably only needs semi-protection for a day or two until the news subsides. Steel1943 (talk) 19:21, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

{{RFPP}} Widr (talk) 19:24, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm reopening this request since at least 2 other IPs have since vandalized Prince as a result of Prince (musician)'s death. Steel1943 (talk) 23:18, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I, JethroBT drop me a line 01:19, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 21:41, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Gilliam. I, JethroBT drop me a line 01:22, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection There are no discussions on the talk page discussing a move. In 2008 a bot put the move protection template on the page. I was unable to identify the admin who protected this page, so did not ask anyone, but since protection has been in place for 8+ years I think this is an appropriate place to ask. Protection ought not be in place for this long without a good reason, and I am unable to identify any reason for keeping this or any vandalism about a move. Blue Rasberry (talk) 17:27, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

KrakatoaKatie Can you tell me - what is the quickest way to identify the admin who did the protection, and the quickest way to identify the times when a move was attempted? Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:22, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Bluerasberry: Sure! Each page and user has logs for protection, deletion, blocks, and so forth, and the {{pagelinks}} and {{userlinks}} templates conveniently contain a link to the public log. It's up above in this very section. You can filter by the kind of log you want to see. There's a caveat here, though - if the page was deleted and recreated, the logs won't always carry forward depending on how the recreation was done. Before we had revdel we had to delete the whole page and selectively restore versions (which was a real PITA for pages with hundreds of edits), and that's what was done in this case so the logs did carry forward. Likewise, sometimes the logs (particularly the protection log) don't always move with a page, and I have no idea why. But there they are. :-) Katietalk 14:49, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
KrakatoaKatie I see - thanks. I have hardly experimented with this.
Other questions:
  1. Can you help me interpret part of the log? It says that on March 7 2014 Graham87 restored the page. There seems to be no record of anything being deleted, so why is there a record of a restoration? Is there another deletion record somewhere?
  2. What seems to be the last move was done in 2008. I think you are calling the person doing the vandal move an IP, when actually they seem to be a registered account which is not autoconfirmed. Nowadays accounts which are not autoconfirmed cannot move pages, but they used to be able to do so, right? If that is correct, we still now have protection from this kind of vandalism without page protection, right?
  3. It is not bad in general to use indefinite page protection? I am just seeing one case of vandalism in the logs, and the response has been 8 years of protection. I am not aware of other factors to consider. Is indefinite protection a standard response in this case? Maybe the admin who protected has more information but I do not see more.
Thanks for any comments you can give to help me better understand general rules and practices for this case and future ones. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:02, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely. The page logs can be fascinating. I'd move this to your talk, but I think it's relevant to the discussion and might help some other users. :-)

  • Graham87 restored some normal vandalism that he felt shouldn't have been deleted when NawlinWiki had to delete and restore the page. It's the equivalent of restoring the visibility of something that was revdel'd.
  • Here is the move log. See the redlink to Binge drinking is awesome. No, really.? That was the target of the move. Page moves are edits, and they show in the edit history. I should be able to see deleted versions, but I can't, so it's likely there were more page moves to targets containing profanity or BLP issues that have been oversighted.
  • What I was saying in my very first comment was that the last IP edit, this one, was an attempt to change the title.
  • You're correct that non-autoconfirmed accounts can't make moves, but we used to have a lower threshold for autoconfirmed status (can't remember what it was). The account that made this page move was possibly Grawp and it was autoconfirmed when the vandalism occurred (it has deleted contributions that you can't see). That was Grawp's MO, as I recall - he would create the socks months prior, then make a few edits the day he wanted to strike. I know WoW used to do that.
  • There are a few rare cases where indef full protection is necessary, some pages where indef semi-protection is necessary, and many more cases where indef move protection is necessary. (There's a unprotect discussion in the RFPP logs and at WP:AN right now about one of them.) It's almost always applied after an escalating length of protection hasn't ended the disruption. I've done it a few times (you can look in my protection log - there's a link on my user page) but I usually limit my edit semi-protects to one year. My tolerance is much lower for BLPs. I don't put up with much nonsense on BLPs and I think most admins feel the same.

I think that covers all your questions. If not, smack me with the trout and I'll try again. ;-) The protection log shows that the page was edit semi-protected for twelve days, which expired as expected, and indefinitely protected from moves. If you want to move the page to another title, make your case and we'll consider it. Otherwise, I can't think of a reason why the page should be moved. Katietalk 16:14, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, once Grawp had targeted a page, it was standard procedure to indefinitely move-protect it. I restored all the deleted revisions on the binge drinking page because I didn't think any of them were so egregious that they should have been hidden to non-admins. FWIW I agree with keeping move protection active and this and similar cases; it's not doing any harm to legitimate editors. Graham87 05:38, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You really haven't lived until you're monitoring the recent changes feed in IRC and you see Grawp or Willy on Wheels do 30+ page moves of some pretty highly visible pages to really disgusting targets in the space of 10 seconds. All hail the edit filters. And as I think we've explained everything here, I'm going close this as Not unprotected. Katietalk 16:03, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Since De Kock is in good form now during the start of 2016 IPL, there have vandalism occurring on his article for more than one instances during the last two weeks. So I request if the article can be semi-protected at least until the time when the IPL season is over. Arka 92 17:35, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 21:01, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Why would IP users need to use this page? The other PERM pages are semi-protected. Peter Sam Fan 19:05, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Because semi-protection also prevents accounts with less than 10 edits or less than 4 days from editing. That would defeat the point of requesting extended confirmed permissions for alternate accounts. BethNaught (talk) 19:06, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Forgot. Peter Sam Fan 19:09, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 21:35, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of seven days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 21:39, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

23 April 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Rah2882 (talk) 13:51, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 13:53, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP's persistently add in blatant vandalism. Rusted AutoParts 17:32, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 17:44, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some editor and IP seem to have an obsession with uploading copyvio images to the BLPs article, Thanks,. –Davey2010Talk 18:31, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 18:47, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP continues to add unsourced pov original research, which contradicts sourced material. Onel5969 TT me 18:37, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 18:51, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism by anonymous users. Calvin Wisanto (talk) 05:16, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The nominator vandalized the page before: redirect to a redirect that redirect to the current article. 333-blue 06:13, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Widr (talk) 12:55, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP keeps posting personal attack and every time I delete it, he or she reverts. Gone on 4 times today. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:30, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:46, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuing anon POV pushing. Macedonian, a Greek (talk) 16:43, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:47, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection - One of my old doppelganger accounts. Back when I was an admin, I protected the page, and now I am unable to edit it! I would appreciate it if an admin could unprotect both the page and its associated talk page. Cheers! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:20, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Widr (talk) 16:30, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:43, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – App that is seemingly popular with kids, so many cases of IP vandalism. This is also discussed on the talk page. Laber□T 00:38, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 10:35, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive editing. IP editor making edits in opposition to consensus established on the talk page. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 02:39, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 10:32, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Renew pending changes: Protecting administrator said that he is very busy in real-life. Also, the page has been vandalized this month, including the last two days. --George Ho (talk) 02:44, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Widr (talk) 10:30, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Renew pending changes: Protecting administrator not active for a while. The last revert was five days ago. George Ho (talk) 02:50, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Absolutely no reason to renew at this point. Widr (talk) 10:29, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Long-time persistent vd. Optakeover(U)(T)(C) 02:50, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 10:28, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. George Ho (talk) 03:01, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 10:27, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Renew pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Protecting administrator not active at the moment. George Ho (talk) 03:05, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Widr (talk) 10:27, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Content unsourced or Disruptive Editing hasn't confirm the cast appear from the rumor in 2 weeks ago. also add by Bea Binene still not the sign artist remake. [59]. Oripaypaykim (talk) 07:04, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 10:26, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: The article has been vandalized by several IP editors within the past few days ([60], [61], [62]). Probably this is because of the subject's statement that made him controversial since last week. Israel's Son 09:45, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: There doesn't seem to be enough vandalism by multiple IPs and at a frequent enough rate to justify page protection here. Some edits are content disputes, but no edit warring appears to be occurring. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:46, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 10:25, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Renew pending changes: Protecting administrator not active for a while. The last revert was five days ago. George Ho (talk) 02:50, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Absolutely no reason to renew at this point. Widr (talk) 10:29, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Long-time persistent vd. Optakeover(U)(T)(C) 02:50, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 10:28, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. George Ho (talk) 03:01, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 10:27, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Renew pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Protecting administrator not active at the moment. George Ho (talk) 03:05, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Widr (talk) 10:27, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Content unsourced or Disruptive Editing hasn't confirm the cast appear from the rumor in 2 weeks ago. also add by Bea Binene still not the sign artist remake. [63]. Oripaypaykim (talk) 07:04, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 10:26, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: The article has been vandalized by several IP editors within the past few days ([64], [65], [66]). Probably this is because of the subject's statement that made him controversial since last week. Israel's Son 09:45, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: There doesn't seem to be enough vandalism by multiple IPs and at a frequent enough rate to justify page protection here. Some edits are content disputes, but no edit warring appears to be occurring. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:46, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 10:25, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Redirect that keeps on getting altered. Wgolf (talk) 00:36, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, the disruptively behaving user is autoconfirmed and has not been even warned.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:07, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – An disambiguation which related to the conflict between Arab and Israel. 333-blue 03:32, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any evidence of disruption?--Ymblanter (talk) 06:37, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No disrupts is seen. 333-blue 09:12, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined--Ymblanter (talk) 09:33, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of disruption by dynamic IP. Mathsci (talk) 07:29, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, user warned and should be blocked if one more revert has been made--Ymblanter (talk) 09:05, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. TheCoffeeAddict talk|contribs 09:30, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:34, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent re-entry of abusive information.Criffer (talk) 23:23, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 01:51, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I was the one previously asking for semi-protection until after the 2016 NFL draft. The level of IP vandalism has increased over the past few days, and it will increase even further as the draft comes closer. Please semi-protect this article until May 1. --bender235 (talk) 04:21, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 10:34, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 01:53, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 10:33, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. --Kansas Bear (talk) 02:41, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 10:30, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Marquis de Faux (talk) 03:47, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Likely to be semi-protected. 333-blue 06:00, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, there were no IP edits since 18 April.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:41, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Adding contents which not meet good faiths. 333-blue 06:07, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – This user seems to have retired 7 years ago, yet his user page is being repeatedly targeted for harassment by IP editors. I'm suggesting indefinite semi-protection here because it's unlikely that any IP editor needs to edit this page, and few people are likely to notice when it's vandalized. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:55, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 07:02, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. General Ization Talk 19:52, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Talk page access revoked BethNaught (talk) 19:54, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated block evasion by anon. Feinoha Talk 22:34, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind it seems admins have dealt with this vandal by other means. Feinoha Talk 23:14, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor (for the bot) Widr (talk) 23:15, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't make any sense also to semi-protect a sandbox for new users to practice. (ping Feinoha) Optakeover(U)(T)(C) 02:51, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Temporary protection is fine, but I argue for indefinite protection as this is pretty much a historical page, and has been repeatedly targeted for vandalism. Optakeover(U)(T)(C) 00:05, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 06:36, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Bentogoa (talk) 17:47, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 17:47, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 21:40, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 21:42, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Laber□T 22:12, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Widr (talk) 22:16, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Bentogoa (talk) 17:47, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 17:47, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 21:40, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 21:42, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Laber□T 22:12, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Widr (talk) 22:16, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

24 April 2016

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since I filed my last request, lots of new vandalism came up. Laber□T 15:00, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 16:42, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Adam9007 (talk) 15:23, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 16:43, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf (talk) 19:30, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Widr (talk) 19:33, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Has only a capitalization difference with Policy Sciences (Journal), which was previously salted. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 19:53, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Widr (talk) 19:56, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection or Indefinite template protection: Disruptive editing, multiple vandalism editions and issues by unregistered and registered users.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 1:29, April 24, 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 18:33, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection or Indefinite template protection: Disruptive editing, multiple vandalism editions and issues by unregistered users.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 1:29, April 24, 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 18:34, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – constant target of Anon IPs . Vjmlhds 18:45, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:11, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High-level of disruptive editing from IP's and anonymous editors to album-stub artist; high-profiled release from highly recognized recording artist. livelikemusic talk! 16:52, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:59, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 17:33, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 18:05, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: Highly visible template – Was fully protected by DMacks seven years ago, but it does not appear to have "sensitive" transclusions or that many transclusions period, so it's more a candidate for template protection. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:08, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Present on ITN for a while. PC would help mitigate the occasional vandalism. QEDK (TC) 11:32, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 11:52, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been protected nine times in the past two years, can we please just accept that it is a target of IP vandals and indefinitely protect it?!. Azealia911 talk 15:28, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected Widr (talk) 15:31, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism is evident in the past couple of days due to upcoming Philippine Presidential Elections come 2016. Please check history. Thank you. Mclovin'tosh (talk) 15:40, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:05, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Non-confirmed users are constantly mistaking her name as incorrect and changing it despite the cited reference. Equil(talk) 13:30, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 14:28, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by multiple accounts. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 14:06, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

its hard to revert 3 edits per mins Bentogoa (talk) 14:16, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it's rampant hatred. I can't keep up with the need to revert. --JamesAM (talk) 14:20, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. Widr (talk) 14:27, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit-warring by IP-hopping editor.Mezigue (talk) 14:16, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 14:26, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. LG-Gunther :  Talk  01:01, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:55, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pending changes not cutting it, need IPs shut out. Montanabw(talk) 02:30, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 10:02, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 03:02, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 10:01, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – People are assuming he's left WWE after one tweet. While the wording would tend to suggest that, there's been NO confirmation. CrashUnderride 03:47, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 10:01, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Drive by IP engaging in slow-motion vandalism . Montanabw(talk) 04:15, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 10:00, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Music1201 talk 04:40, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 09:59, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 05:07, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 09:56, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism of Dsfsswec. Mys_721tx (talk) 09:17, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The socks have been globally locked. Widr (talk) 09:55, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. 333-blue 09:18, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, technically not possible--Ymblanter (talk) 09:25, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Ymblanter:Why is this not possible for my talk page to be protected. Here is the latest vandalism[67]] and my talk page had an IP put up the same personal attack six times yesterday. I predicted[68] they would be back and they are....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 09
46, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Because pending changes can not be applied to talk pages. Anyway, now I semi-protected for three days.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:05, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:00, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Vandalism ceased 4:30 hours ago. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:34, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The section federal corruption indictment keeps being blanked by different people with no explanation whatsoever. Virophage (talk) 10:18, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 10:29, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – This article, and a few other articles about actors in the same TV series (including Katherine McNamara), have been targetted by a lot of different IPs and new accounts recently. Katherine McNamara's article had pending changes applied, so that might be appropriate for this one as well. It was semi-protected for a few days, about a week ago. bonadea contributions talk 10:55, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 11:00, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IP users, such as here, here, here, here, here, etc. Protection should remain in place until at least the end of the current Premier League season, i.e. until 15 May 2016, when tempers would possibly simmer down. -The Gnome (talk) 18:49, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 18:52, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: @Widr: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:15, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, they have. Widr (talk) 19:17, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
But you've PC protected, not semi protected. tutterMouse (talk) 06:14, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the swift response, Widr. However, the page needs (at least) a Semi-Protected status. Having it Pending-Changes protected will not discourage vandalism attempts and time wasting. Please reconsider. -The Gnome (talk) 06:49, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed now. There has been no edits since, so let's just go with this for now. Widr (talk) 08:49, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther :  Talk  01:50, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 10:02, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and Persistent disruptive editing.Donnowin1 (talk) 05:21, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 09:59, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 05:32, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 09:57, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring . Laber□T 01:22, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:34, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Sandbox and my TALK PAGE

IPs persistent vandalism. Needs REVDEL. Gross. NOW. 7&6=thirteen () 01:50, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Protection for WP:Sandbox is declined, vandal activity ceased 4:40 hours ago. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:50, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. User talk:7&6=thirteen semi-protected for two days. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:50, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As it should be. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 07:09, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done--Ymblanter (talk) 08:35, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP Vandalism, Somebody spamming content that are not related to the topic. DueChayapol (talk) 06:11, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:29, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive edits by IPs. Zyma (talk) 07:33, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:52, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Ymblanter: IP-hopper returned just after you blocked his previous IP. diff --Zyma (talk) 08:29, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:37, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Several IPs and one SPA claiming that the subject recently married "Ed Banayoti" rather than (per source) "Ashraf Banayotti". McGeddon (talk) 08:18, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:26, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring . Laber□T 01:22, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:34, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Sandbox and my TALK PAGE

IPs persistent vandalism. Needs REVDEL. Gross. NOW. 7&6=thirteen () 01:50, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Protection for WP:Sandbox is declined, vandal activity ceased 4:40 hours ago. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:50, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. User talk:7&6=thirteen semi-protected for two days. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:50, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As it should be. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 07:09, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done--Ymblanter (talk) 08:35, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP Vandalism, Somebody spamming content that are not related to the topic. DueChayapol (talk) 06:11, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:29, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive edits by IPs. Zyma (talk) 07:33, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:52, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Ymblanter: IP-hopper returned just after you blocked his previous IP. diff --Zyma (talk) 08:29, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:37, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Several IPs and one SPA claiming that the subject recently married "Ed Banayoti" rather than (per source) "Ashraf Banayotti". McGeddon (talk) 08:18, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:26, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: High transclusions templlate. 333-blue 01:16, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Already protected. No justification was presented for full protection. Materialscientist (talk) 01:20, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandal target. Feinoha Talk 02:20, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Malcolmxl5 for 48 hours. tutterMouse (talk) 06:26, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 07:13, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:54, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent and disruptive vandalism. TheWarOfArt (talk) 21:12, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Doesn't look that out of hand, even for semi. We don't fully protect except when absolutely necessary, and certainly would not impose an indefinite duration MusikAnimal talk 22:11, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection:Persistent vandalism by an IP-hopping vandal constantly trying to reinsert incorrect information. Page has been semi-protected several times before to ward off same IP-hopping vandal.--Mr Fink (talk) 23:08, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 23:11, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IPs, typical of UFC events. Thanks. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 00:45, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. There have been so many vandalisms by several users in the past hour or so, it is almost impossible to keep up with them. Donner60 (talk) 01:35, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Multiple IPs using unreliable sources, ignoring article talk page. --Kansas Bear (talk) 20:30, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 22:08, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Please have a quick look at the page history, it has been highly vandalized and most edits of anonymous users are disruptive. Kouhi (talk) 21:08, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's try a brief semi first MusikAnimal talk 22:09, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism during Stanley Cup play-offs. Keri (talk) 22:11, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 22:12, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The page needs to be semi-protected because of multiple vandalisms.

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 15:22, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Only one IP edit was accepted; the rest were just endless attacks on the subject. PC might not handle edits that indicate fandom of the female singer unless semi-protection seems too much; maybe alternatively renew pending changes instead?. George Ho (talk) 17:50, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 17:53, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – It was recently encouraged by CPG Grey to change this page on the Hello Internet podcast. Needs just a temp protection until the 'fans' move on. KylieTastic (talk) 19:47, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 19:53, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

25 April 2016

Indefinite create protection QEDK (TC) 10:41, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Widr (talk) 10:52, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Confusingly though it has been salted according to the logs, it was still able to be recreated. tutterMouse (talk) 15:45, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: One user with dynamic IP makes edits without any explanation. maybe protecting the page forces him/her to go to the talk page and make discussion about it, having dynamic IPs makes it hard to communicate with. Mohsen1248 (talk) 15:57, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 16:33, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
what about now ? he did it one more time, do I need to re-open the case or asking here is enough ? Mohsen1248 (talk) 17:13, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I blocked the IP. Report back if there's more disruption. Widr (talk) 17:19, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: ongoing vandalism.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:14, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 20:34, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Heavy vandalism from IP editors today. — MShabazz Talk/Stalk 12:47, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 13:43, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seem to be persistent school-related vandalism including the addition of the motto "respect donald trump and love hitler" which lasted for 3 days. astro (talk) 18:25, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:27, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 18:37, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:28, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Laber□T 18:48, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected. Favonian (talk) 18:59, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Protection: I'm getting fed up of constantly being pinged as a result of edit warriors' readdition of links to Jasmine Thompson and Belmont Prisons. Launchballer 12:24, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 12:39, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 12:39, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – IPs and SPAs have repeatedly added the same unsourced roll call of a hundred gang members (including their real names) to the lede - potentially a massive BLP violation. McGeddon (talk) 14:09, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @McGeddon: I think there's some socking going on there too. Katietalk 15:00, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This page has been semi-protected in the past. Recently, it's been the subject of vandalism and persistent sockpuppetry to add unsourced and factually incorrect certifications/chart rankings. Every single edit this month, so far, has been either vandalism or a reversion of vandalism. I'll leave it to an admin to decide whether semi-protection or pending changes is more appropriate, but some type of protection would be helpful. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Никита-Родин-2002/Archive. ~ RobTalk 14:52, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 15:03, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Vandalism. Bivek bhattarai (talk) 06:56, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Widr (talk) 06:59, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection for three weeks: disruptive editing by IPs. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 13:36, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 13:44, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: This was protected by Stifle seven or so years ago but now that WP:PUF has been shut down and only 55 transclusions are left, it can probably be wholly unprotected. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:27, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Let us consult the MusikAnimal, who set template protection in November. Katietalk 01:19, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the ping. Given WP:PUF is now a thing of the past, should we delete the template altogether, or redirect to {{ffd}}? I'm guessing {{oldpuffull}} we wouldn't do away with just yet, as that's used for historical reference MusikAnimal talk 01:35, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I was sorta planning to ask at TfD about what to do with the {{puf}} template after the last few discussions still open were closed, with a preference towards redirecting the template. As for {{oldpuffull}}, that one's used for past PUF discussions so I was not planning to do anything with it, yes.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:50, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Happy with unprotection as and when necessary, but this should not be redirected to FFD as that would cause problems with some scripts. Instead, once all old cases are closed, the template should be replaced by a warning saying "this template is no longer in use, please do <foo> instead". Stifle (talk) 10:05, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected Downgraded to semi. I didn't see any mainspace pages this is transcluded to, but I'm still on my first cup of coffee. If anyone wants to completely unprotect it, I have no objection. Katietalk 14:56, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BLP, U.S. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, ALLEGATION OF LINK TO ASSASSINATION

Temporary full-protection: There is a National Enquirer story titled: Ted Cruz's Father linked to JFK assassination.[69] There is now a second source,[70] but that story says a tabloid is making claims, along with counter claims that This is another garbage story in a tabloid full of garbage, and that The explosive suggestion that Cruz’s father would have had any affiliation with Oswald is not corroborated in any other way.

Edclass66 has been trying to include this in the article three days in a row, and been reverted by three different editors. (History link.) Page protection is appropriate to ensure neither they, nor anyone else, try to re-add this tabloid story to the BLP without consensus. In talk page discussions Edclass66 has been warned that this is a BLP issue and that edit warring negative material into a biography may result in a block. A stern warning, or possibly even a block, may be warranted to ensure they do not try to insert this on some other page without consensus to do so. Alsee (talk) 10:21, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I believe this is now fixed. Alsee (talk) 10:46, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Warned the user about edit warring. If disruption continues please report to WP:ANEW MusikAnimal talk 03:23, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Sports Devotee (talk) 09:03, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 09:07, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by numerous editors. Egghead06 (talk) 10:17, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 10:19, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Keeps on getting COI edits, person has been warned multiple times about it (There was a possible sockpuppet also, but that person was blocked). Wgolf (talk) 23:44, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 05:06, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Evking22 (talk) 02:15, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 05:05, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Popular show returns, lots of vandalism accompanies. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:15, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 04:53, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of spam links to the first episode. Alex|The|Whovian? 03:10, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 04:53, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This page, like Nickelodeon UK Kids' Choice Awards 2011 continues to suffer a high level of IP vandalism, to the extent that almost all edits to the pages since the article's creation has been vandalism by the same IP-hopping vandal. Whack-a-mole reporting at WP:AIV has been suggested on several occasions but is clearly not doing the job - this vandalism has been ongoing for years. (Almost every other annual article in this category is already protected, for the same reason.) Bonusballs (talk) 21:31, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 02:18, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 23:53, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 02:14, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Omni Flames let's talk about it 23:56, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 02:12, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request unprotection - This page is blocked from recreation. There was a deletion discussion in 2015 with 2 delete votes based on the sourcing in the article. I created a draft in my sandbox and there are plenty of reliable sources that cover the topic in-depth. There were deletions of the article previously in 2011 and prior, but you will notice that many of the sources have come after that time. Thanks for your consideration.--Strennaman (talk) 20:36, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @JzG:, the protecting administrator.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:43, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @Ymblanter:. I was going to discuss there first, but there is a message on the user's page that they are on a Wiki-break. --Strennaman (talk) 23:37, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Guy is on a break for several weeks - said so at AN. @Strennaman: Link to your draft, please? Katietalk 18:37, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @KrakatoaKatie:. It's in my sandbox here.--Strennaman (talk) 20:20, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done Actually, I've moved your draft into the mainspace, which is the same thing. It is not eligible for deletion under WP:CSD#G4, so if someone tags it (they shouldn't if they look at my edit summary, but you never know) follow the instructions to contest the deletion and point to this discussion. Be sure to fix your categories now that it's there. I personally think it will survive AFD, but keep improving your references. Katietalk 01:08, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: I would like to create this article with reliable sources. I think it meets WP:BASIC and WP:ENT. I have a draft article ready at User:Managerarc/Rukhsar Rehman. - Managerarc talk 20:16, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Moved into mainspace. If it's tagged for G4 (it shouldn't be because it's 100% different and referenced well), point them here. Katietalk 01:24, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent removal of block discussion by blocked user. Requesting revocation of ability to edit own talk page. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 12:46, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Thapelo Molele Junior can no longer edit own talk page. Yaris678 (talk) 18:17, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request temporary semi-protection, in addition to KEEPING the other current states of protection -- due to persistent vandalism from multiple sources. Thank you admins !!!. — Cirt (talk) 17:08, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 18:06, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – SPAs with names like "Factsldn15" and "Thetruth7100" are continuing to provide rambling lists of criminal gang members, providing absolutely no sources. McGeddon (talk) 18:25, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 18:27, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

26 April 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Railfans adding unsourced info. TJH2018talk 15:33, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 15:43, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – This is a featured article about an extinct rat which has not seen any non-superficial edits since 2010 other than the fact that, since September 2015, a number of anonymous users have been insistent that the article should mention that the species was mentioned on a particular vlog. Not surprisingly, there is nothing resembling a reliable source for this. I've protected it myself temporarily in the past, but people just started up again afterwards, and so I now think that it should probably be protected long-term. I am probably "involved", and so should not protect it myself. Josh Milburn (talk) 19:08, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 20:04, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Chase (talk | contributions) 19:21, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 20:03, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Evangelical IP user on a moral crusade. Perhaps I overreached with my last request for semi protection; WP:SEMI says, "An alternative to semi-protection is pending changes, which is sometimes favoured when an article is being vandalised regularly, but otherwise receives a low amount of editing." That seems to be exactly the situation with this article. – voidxor 19:25, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 20:00, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism from different IP, believed to be a same person. Tafeax (talk) 19:28, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 19:59, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Blocked user continues to vandalize talk page, making death threats to another user. Please block talk page access and RevDel edits if needed. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:04, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Widr (talk) 20:06, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Prominent help page, getting hit by test edits and misplaced articles. John of Reading (talk) 18:59, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Widr (talk) 19:12, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Chase (talk | contributions) 19:08, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:14, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism from IPs and newly created accounts. David Biddulph (talk) 19:13, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:15, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -©2016 Compassionate727(Talk)(Contributions) 14:40, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 14:44, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Excessive vandalism by several anonymous editors and a non-autoconfirmed account.

Entranced98 (talk) 18:19, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 18:21, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User using several IPs and new accounts to add linkspam. BilCat (talk) 18:42, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 18:46, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article of candidate running for top office in a country. After last protection expired the IP vandals began with the persistent WP:BLP violations. Recommend one more month as the election is on May 9th and a month should allow for dust to settle after the election. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 17:10, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 17:55, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of refspam in recent days. Matthew Ferguson (talk) 17:18, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Widr (talk) 17:56, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Previous 6 month semiprot ended April 16th. 12 vandalism edits since expiration. -- ferret (talk) 17:47, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 17:59, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anonymous IP-hooping nationalists are edit-warring with multiple editors. Ogress 17:58, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 17:59, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since the previous request was rejected a few or several days ago, predictable attacks on the subject haven't stopped. More or less likely fans of Kesha, whose case against him was rejected by the judges. Or maybe they believe in her. I'm not confident that renewing pending changes would help matters as the attacks will continue. Nevertheless, if that's too much, I don't mind pending changes renewed. George Ho (talk) 17:58, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 18:01, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 16:28, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 17:06, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Since the last month-long semi-protection expired on April 21, vandalism and disruptive editing has persisted. I recommend another month or perhaps two. GoneIn60 (talk) 16:42, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 17:06, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Though this page was protected from creation (except for administrators) for being created for vandalism or misinformation three times, this protection should be reversed since the service does exist and is absolutely vital. You can verify that by simply Googling it.--RekishiEJ (talk) 15:22, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The protecting admin has been inactive for a while now so do you have a suitable draft article ready? tutterMouse (talk) 15:47, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No, since I'm not familiar with the topic. However, the article should still be allowed to be created since it is notable.--RekishiEJ (talk) 10:26, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined A userspace-draft would be the way to go here me thinks. Notability can then be judged. Lectonar (talk) 12:28, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: From create=sysop to create=templateeditor to allow me to move Template:Table/sandbox to Template:Table. This template serves a completely different purpose than the class="wikitable " template that was previously deleted (which tried to replace the entire table syntax), is not redundant to wikimarkup like the previous template, simplifies CSS class specification (for example, from class="wikitable collapsible autocollapse" to {{table|auto}}), mirrors the functionality of many non-Wikipedia wikis that use a {{table}} template to specify table styles (such as sv:Template:Table, [71], [72], [73], [74], [75]), and makes Wikipedia compatible with the legacy version of the excel2wiki tool. User:Plastikspork is semi-retired. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 15:56, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Katietalk 16:10, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 14:07, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 14:12, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ongoing ip vandalism. Valenciano (talk) 15:03, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 15:04, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TJH2018talk 15:30, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 15:39, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 14:07, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 14:12, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ongoing ip vandalism. Valenciano (talk) 15:03, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 15:04, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TJH2018talk 15:30, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 15:39, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 14:07, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 14:12, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ongoing ip vandalism. Valenciano (talk) 15:03, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 15:04, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TJH2018talk 15:30, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 15:39, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Salt: I first came across this page 22 April. It's been nominated for speedy twice by me, and most recently today by Katrinamoris2014. Both my noms were accepted by two different admins, and the most recent nom has yet to be considered. It just keeps getting recreated. No idea if it was created prior to my first patrolling it four days ago.

The creator seems to be a series of SPA socks. For instance, the latest iteration Bookerwiki, began editing 30 minutes after the last MISPL was deleted, and their first post was to JohnCD's talk, defending the article ostensibly created by "another" user. This was less that 24 hours before they created exact article again. TimothyJosephWood 13:25, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Deleted again and salted. Lectonar (talk) 13:57, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seeking long term semiprot. From what I can tell, every edit in 2016 except one by myself and one by AdrianGamer has been reverted. -- ferret (talk) 13:37, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Have watchlisted. Lectonar (talk) 13:58, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent block evasion/sock puppetry. The page was recently protected for the same reason, but the problem returned as soon as the protection expired. Deli nk (talk) 13:38, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:56, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Gaijin42 (talk) 12:53, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:06, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Almost immediate return of IP vandalism. Escape Orbit (Talk) 13:04, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:09, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection - This page seems to have blocked indefinitely for no reason. 78.148.67.136 (talk) 13:38, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Paging Maxim. Katietalk 18:32, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I've down-graded protection to PC1. Makes sense, with the low edit rate. Let's see what Maxim says... but it may be appropriate to remove all protection. Yaris678 (talk) 19:45, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done Somewhat, procedural. Lectonar (talk) 12:25, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Opencooper (talk) 04:05, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 06:15, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Ongoing and extremely persistent sockpuppetry that involves changing chart rankings and certifications of Green Day songs. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Никита-Родин-2002. ~ RobTalk 04:11, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 06:05, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - Sports Devotee (talk) 07:29, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 08:00, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – the ipv4 hopper is not confirm the My Love from the Star against the rumor cast also unsourced content or disruptive. Oripaypaykim (talk) 10:25, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 11:52, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Quite a few times this month, an IP has gone on a mini-spree of adding the Chinese pronunciation to the names of Japanese subjects, in particular politicians. They do up to about 10 articles in one time. As you can see from the article history, Akira Amari has been targeted the most as far as I am aware, having been edited 5 times in two weeks. I wouldn't call it a "high" level of IP vandalism, but it is a bit time consuming to have to hunt down all of their edits after one appears in my watchlist. There may well be other articles too which have not come to my or anyone else's attention yet. Protecting one article may not stop the person, but I am hoping it gives the message that the additions they are making are not welcome. As it is a different IP each time, I can't see the point in asking for them to be blocked. If there is a better way of addressing this (other than watchlisting the biography of every Japanese person) I would be happy to hear it. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 01:04, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. WaggersTALK 09:02, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Waggers. The IP came to the party by trying to add it again just 10 minutes after you protected it... AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 10:02, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 04:30, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 06:00, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 04:59, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 05:52, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Kante4 (talk) 05:19, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 05:51, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – The corresponding template is already template protected. From what I've observed, their backing modules usually have the same level of protection.  — Andy W. (talk · contrib) 08:15, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. WaggersTALK 09:08, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Person changing IPs reverting without discussion. Baking Soda (talk) 09:14, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. WaggersTALK 09:35, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fully protected because it's not only IPs who are edit warring. WaggersTALK 09:43, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Incorrect information provided by Herman Jaka and constant vandalism in spite of efforts to correct the false info. Buonkee (talk) 06:40, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Widr (talk) 08:02, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 07:25, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 08:01, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Since forever, IPs and new accounts have been changing the total awards to inflated numbers (+400). Cornerstonepicker (talk) 07:35, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the accidental rollback. I sneezed and clicked. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 07:48, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected Widr (talk) 07:58, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Second time this page has been moved against consensus and guidelines. See talk page for the closed RM discussion. ~ RobTalk 21:29, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 06:57, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Multiple-IP vandalism. Meters (talk) 22:37, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:58, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Page appears to have been under the same addition of unsourced and unbelievable additions (i.e. containing songs released after the release of the game) for over a year. 2010 game is unlikely to have need of valid updates hence suggest Indefinite semi protection. . KylieTastic (talk) 23:20, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:00, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 00:14, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:01, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Dynamic IPv6 edit warring. Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:14, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:03, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending Changes protection: IP Editors continuously adding Donald Trump in various sections of the article. --Cameron11598 (Converse) 06:14, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 06:25, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This vandalism appears not to stop. 5 days after automatic unprotection from a semi and there is still a large stream of vandalism. Please protect again. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 02:13, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 06:17, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – A lot of users adding in unsourced info constantly as well as vandalism. Tinton5 (talk) 03:42, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 06:15, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Ongoing and extremely persistent sockpuppetry that involves changing chart rankings and certifications of Green Day songs. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Никита-Родин-2002. ~ RobTalk 04:11, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I'm noticing the last semi-protect lasted two months, and that this page has been frequently targeted by the socks listed in that SPI since at least December (a good % of the last 250 edits have occurred in that time, much of which are edits by these socks along with reverts of those edits). I have a hunch they may still be at it in six months, though I'm hoping the sockmaster(s) will find something else to do, outside of Wikipedia, by then. Wishful thinking. Anyway, I'll leave it up to the admin who decides the status of this article. MPFitz1968 (talk) 05:07, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 06:06, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Ongoing and extremely persistent sockpuppetry that involves changing chart rankings and certifications of Green Day songs. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Никита-Родин-2002. ~ RobTalk 04:11, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 06:04, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continued IP and new account harassment from several socks; I need a break from constantly rollbacking it. Nate (chatter) 06:08, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 06:14, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit-warring has resumed since protection expired. GABHello! 00:54, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected – Two weeks. EdJohnston (talk) 01:23, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Offensive name – Was deleted a few months ago. Shouldn't need to be recreated. Omni Flames let's talk about it 01:33, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. I can begin to imagine someone starting a blog by that name and then the blog becoming notable, but I can also imagine a lot of sci-fi and fantasy plots. I'll unprotect it if that ever happens, but I'm not holding my breath. Ian.thomson (talk) 01:44, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 04:49, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 06:02, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism; one-week protection recommended (until after the draft concludes). DPH1110 (talk) 05:33, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 05:50, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Continuous and unsourced changing of birthdate from April 28 to April 26, usually by new or IP users. Amccann421 (talk) 05:48, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 05:49, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit-warring has resumed since protection expired. GABHello! 00:54, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected – Two weeks. EdJohnston (talk) 01:23, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Offensive name – Was deleted a few months ago. Shouldn't need to be recreated. Omni Flames let's talk about it 01:33, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. I can begin to imagine someone starting a blog by that name and then the blog becoming notable, but I can also imagine a lot of sci-fi and fantasy plots. I'll unprotect it if that ever happens, but I'm not holding my breath. Ian.thomson (talk) 01:44, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 04:49, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 06:02, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism; one-week protection recommended (until after the draft concludes). DPH1110 (talk) 05:33, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 05:50, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Continuous and unsourced changing of birthdate from April 28 to April 26, usually by new or IP users. Amccann421 (talk) 05:48, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 05:49, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism is taking place on this page and most of the recent edits on this page are vandalism or reverting vandalism. This is a topic that would receive a lot of hate and permanent semi-protection would be best for this page. Have a look through the history and it's just constant vandalism. st170etalk 19:46, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 19:51, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Evangelical IP user on a moral crusade. – voidxor 19:58, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 20:34, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Promotional links. Distrait cognizance (talk) 20:38, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 20:39, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism is taking place on this page and most of the recent edits on this page are vandalism or reverting vandalism. This is a topic that would receive a lot of hate and permanent semi-protection would be best for this page. Have a look through the history and it's just constant vandalism. st170etalk 19:46, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 19:51, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Evangelical IP user on a moral crusade. – voidxor 19:58, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 20:34, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Promotional links. Distrait cognizance (talk) 20:38, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 20:39, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: My prevoius request for page protection was granted due to constant vandalism of the statistics section by a user with varying IP addresses. The page protection expired a few days ago and the same IP is vandalising the page again. Please protect the page for longer this time. VG31-irl 16:07, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 19:23, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Same problem as with page in request above. VG31-irl 16:09, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 19:23, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 18:27, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 19:27, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

27 April 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Highly persistent sockpuppetry by at least two trolls. GABHello! 18:45, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 18:46, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. General Ization Talk 19:51, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:54, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Repeated re-creation of unsourced article deleted at AFD. Result was "Redirect." Please be sure to look at deletion history. Toddst1 (talk) 18:13, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Yamaguchi先生.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:50, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Seems to have to come to the attention of IPs who want to claim the person is a white supremacist without reliable sources. Kelly hi! 18:07, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 18:11, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 18:26, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 18:30, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I can't believe I'm doing this, but this page has been suffering IP vandalism and could use a temp semi. (Seriously?). Ogress 18:39, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 18:42, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 12:51, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 13:13, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Resumption of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:30, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:33, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent violations of BLP. CLCStudent (talk) 16:33, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:35, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf (talk) 17:20, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Widr (talk) 17:21, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ChamithN (talk) 14:05, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 14:07, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: persistant vandalism by multiple users who haven't logged in; IP addresses geolocate to many different countries; also, a living person; also, the head of state of a country; also, a controversial figure. Vandalism often takes the form of changing his birthplace or changing his title from "President" to "Dictator" or replacing text with personal attacks. I previously requested semi-protection 18 April 2016, which was denied, but the page has been vandalized 11 times by 7 different IP addresses in the 9 days since then, to say nothing of the vandalism that first made me request semi-protection. If semi-protection was too strong, how about pending changes? --Akhenaten0 (talk) 15:07, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 15:34, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism following recent events, large number of unsuitable edits for a BLP article. IrishPete 15:31, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 15:35, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – page is being vandalized as her film FAN has just released in India i have reverted and reported the vandalism . Fitindia (talk) 06:41, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Thank you for your reverts. Lectonar (talk) 06:46, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Blocked user creating sockpuppets to constantly revert, see page history. Has previously been protected for the same reason. Jeni (talk) 10:30, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 10:31, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from dynamic IP (180.171). Qed237 (talk) 12:49, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:13, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. BattleshipMan (talk) 23:20, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. kelapstick(bainuu) 05:22, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – By my count, there have been three constructive edits so far this month, and all of them were from autoconfirmed editors. As a high-profile actor, Pratt's article seems to be attracting a lot of vandalism. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:21, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 07:23, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 09:13, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 09:27, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from numerous IPs over a period of time, some of which has stayed in place for two days before being found out. WayfaringWanderer (talk) 02:43, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 05:26, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EricEnfermero (Talk) 04:49, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. kelapstick(bainuu) 05:27, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. kelapstick(bainuu) 05:30, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – On going vandalism. VMS Mosaic (talk) 05:02, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 05:29, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: So Raxstar (rapper) can be moved to this article. Also delete the draft Draft:Raxstar which was declined. Musa Talk  17:54, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your redirect of a draft into the mainspace. AFC submissions can't be speedily deleted until they've had no contributions for six months. Since the AFC submission was declined, I'm going to defer to someone more familiar with WP:MUSIC. Katietalk 14:02, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done As there is an article in mainspace, there is no reason to keep it at the disambiguated title other than the page is protected. No comment on article quality, and it isn't an endorsement of it. Also, Katie is correct about the G13ness of the draft. kelapstick(bainuu) 05:34, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring from several unidentified users without consensus achieved. Wykx (talk) 20:23, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 05:15, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – IP's and new users adding Pat Smear as current member, he's not, he did tour with the band but not a current/official member. Mlpearc (open channel) 20:39, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of seven days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. User is not autoconfirmed, although they look like they are on their way to a block. kelapstick(bainuu) 05:16, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Opencooper (talk) 20:49, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 05:17, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring with apparent conflict of interest. JWNoctistalk 20:51, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 05:18, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing random unsourced changes of dates and facts. Nat Gertler (talk) 21:14, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 05:19, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent unconstructive IP behaviour. Has a history of similar unconstructive editing. —DangerousJXD (talk) 21:31, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 05:21, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long-term disruption. See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Caribbean music vandal. . Binksternet (talk) 22:20, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Katietalk 01:04, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long-term disruption. See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Caribbean music vandal. . Binksternet (talk) 22:20, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Katietalk 01:03, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP Vandalism. – Michael (talk) 23:56, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 05:23, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Nonsense is regularly being added to the article. Random86 (talk) 01:00, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 05:24, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistant vandalism on a current runner of the 2016 presidential campaign; I beleive that this article should be protected under BLP policies. Evking22 (talk) 02:04, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 05:25, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Ongoing and slow burning level of persistent addition of information which is spam and nothing to do with Wikipeida from account and IP. Examples:1, 2 ,3, 4 5 6Sport and politics (talk) 16:53, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 17:07, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Revised request for pending changes protection. Sport and politics (talk) 17:58, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No need for any type of protection at this time. Widr (talk) 18:48, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Snuggums (talk / edits) 18:57, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 19:10, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A longer block would be appreciated as the vandalism has not let up from short protections. JayJayWhat did I do? 23:17, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 01:05, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Nasty vandalism in connection with an ongoing sexual assault scandal. Please semi-protect for some time, maybe a month. bender235 (talk) 23:32, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 01:07, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Recommend protecting for at least 2 days to see if the editors involved are willing to discuss on the talk page. As of this writing, that hasn't happened yet. Thanks. GoneIn60 (talk) 23:55, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 01:02, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 20:16, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 20:32, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent edit warring by combative unregistered editor(s). ElKevbo (talk) 21:54, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 2 months. EdJohnston (talk) 22:14, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My Neighbor Totoro

Unprotection: - There hasn't been any sockpuppetry since the page was protected in late 2008, plus the person who protected it hasn't been active since 2010. Therefore, I think it is time for the page to be unprotected after all these years. 2602:306:C5E4:24A0:9CFE:B4DE:B08A:8190 (talk) 14:22, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The fact that there was no sock-puppetry might be due to the fact that it is protected. Lectonar (talk) 17:47, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

28 April 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive IP-hopper returned to this article again after end of previous protection. He ignores edit summaries and talk page. Just source falsification and personal attacks via edit summaries. Zyma (talk) 10:10, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 20:33, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent sockpuppetry changing details about Green Day to false information. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Никита-Родин-2002. I am specifically requesting pending changes instead of semi-protection to make it easier to track this sockmaster. Due to how persistent they've been, there are concerns that semi-protecting every page they vandalize excessively would just cause them to move to pages that aren't being watched by the editors following them around. ~ RobTalk 12:57, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 20:35, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi or pending You can probably guess the types of edits this page likes to collect. Lot's of people apparently related to the gang either outright vandalizing, or adding in unsourced information. Just looking at the last two months, almost the entire edit history is ip edits and reverts of ip edits. Don't see any reason to expect this to stop at any point in the future, given the topic of the article. TimothyJosephWood 14:17, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 20:36, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppets keep disrupting this page. . Peter Sam Fan 15:50, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 20:37, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent anon vandalism, page has been on-and-off semi-protected in past. If this does not meet indefinite criteria, please consider prolonged time period. --Natural RX 15:56, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 20:39, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – renewed fringe POV-pushing, personal attacks and trolling against other editors, by IPs and socks after expiration of previous protection. Given the persistent disruption, a long period is requested. Constantine 16:04, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 20:40, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Also Karthik Korukonda should be salted. Wgolf (talk) 17:47, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Katietalk 20:41, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated unexplained blanking by IP. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:25, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 20:43, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Very high profile. Rathfelder (talk) 19:00, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 20:44, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is a magnet for vandalism. In the last 100 edits, 39 edits are vandalism, 35 their reverts, leaving only 19 good edits and 7 questionable ones. 84% of vandalism is by IP addresses. Dhrm77 (talk) 20:11, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 20:37, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf (talk) 17:16, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 18:26, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf (talk) 18:34, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator The Anome. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:22, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Chase (talk | contributions) 20:00, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 20:07, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Linguist 111talk 15:26, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 15:30, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Widr - You may want to revist the talkpage history - A new IP's appeared just to continue the war, I wondered if pending changes would be better ?, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 18:04, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 18:06, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Brilliant thank you :) –Davey2010Talk 18:12, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA. Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Comminianus ‎. Dr. K. 17:26, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 17:50, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP hopping troll. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 17:29, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Widr for 12 hours. tutterMouse (talk) 18:08, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP hopping troll. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 17:29, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Widr for 12 hours. tutterMouse (talk) 18:08, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent promotion of the baramatiworld.com website (See history on baramati page and blocking of user:Surwane1 and his sockpuppets). Dhrm77 (talk) 12:33, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 2 months. EdJohnston (talk) 15:57, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing; constant addition of unreliable sources. Page has been protected for the same reason multiple times. Alex|The|Whovian? 13:25, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 15:52, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. –Compassionate727 (T·C) 14:15, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – One year. This BLP article has been semiprotected twice before and has needed a revdel once. EdJohnston (talk) 16:03, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There is a lot of activity adding non-notable, or possible hoax actors and actresses to the show page. Other eyes on the page as well would be appreciate to help clean it up as edits are revised and deleted rapidly. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:33, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 15:51, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – IP users adding promotional content. Nairspecht Converse 07:52, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 08:08, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Recent vandalism spate High profile article likely to be subject to more vandalism leading up to the games.Snookerlover123 (talk) 09:20, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. And not really high-level vandalism. Lectonar (talk) 09:37, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Such an important help page for new editors should not be subject to damaging edits (like this), as it frequently is. : Noyster (talk), 12:32, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. WaggersTALK 14:17, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. Persistent vandalism done by two people so far. They MIGHT be the same person. An IP kept vandalizing the article by removing sourced content and information. EuropeanSwedenAmerican2222 (talk) 23:21, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:41, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection. Two long term editors involved in a livepage edit war, both in violation of 3RR. Have attempted to steer talk page activity toward discussing issues, but both editors seem dedicated to pursuing a discussion in edit summary instead. Protection is a preferred option to blocking both, but it may come to that. BusterD (talk) 02:30, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Seems they moved to talk now...please relist if it picks up. Lectonar (talk) 07:24, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - IPs inserting non-related information to the page. DueChayapol (talk) 07:13, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 07:22, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Since surwane1 and his sockpuppets have been blocked we start having again the same types of edit from random IP addresses. I don't know what the best course of action is. Dhrm77 (talk) 04:35, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 06:42, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – and regular number of IP edits, usually praising subject, sometimes denigrating. See talk page and many other IP edits. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:45, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 06:41, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 05:13, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 06:40, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: BLP policy violations – To avoid any suggestion of my being involved, could someone please protect this page as an editor is turning it into some sort of eschatological fringe article promoting himself and with claims about himself and another living person that have no source and so far as I can see no possible source other than a fringe one. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 09:12, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

When I warned him a little while ago about adding unsourced material to a BLP article his response on his talk page was "The entirety of world history is referrence enough. You are insulting and offending The High Priest Of Israel. Cease you censorship and persecution of me and my people. God will judge all."[76] Doug Weller talk 09:25, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ideally this should be dealt with by another venue, but I see strong "nothere" tendencies. Lectonar (talk) 09:29, 28 April 2016 (UTC) Lectonar[reply]
The culprit has been indeffed, so protection no longer needed. --David Biddulph (talk) 09:52, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yep...just saw that. Have downgraded to 3 days semi-protection in case he decides to come back with a new account. Lectonar (talk) 10:19, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done Lectonar (talk) 10:35, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent unsourced changes, particularly to the contestants table. This article has been protected six times in two months, and I plead with the admin who takes action to long term-protect the article like last years season was. Azealia911 talk 10:01, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protections should have been augmented incrementally. Lectonar (talk) 10:10, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: - I have created an article for Vuly Trampolines at the request of the company. I have declared my conflict of interest and placed it on the talk page here [77]. The draft I created can be seen at this link [78]. The company previously requested someone else to create the page which they did. That user is at this link [79] and did not have much success. They previously asked an admin to unblock the page, which appears to have been denied. The block was made after the article was speedily deleted in June 2013 [80]. I am asking that the page be allowed to be created. Again, I have a conflict of interest as an employee but feel the article written adheres to neutral standards described here [81]. Thanks for looking into this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bahdlee (talkcontribs) 23:41, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging Graham87 as protecting admin. tutterMouse (talk) 09:49, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The draft seems OK to me now, with a variety of sources that establish notability. However I'm going to notify Dabbler about this request, as he was involved in earlier discussions about this page and knows a lot more about trampolining than I do. Graham87 11:05, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I was one of the original objectors to the first page because it was a conflict of interest and also of very limited notability and was written more like an advertisement. This version is better written and referenced but I don't think that this really overcomes my previous objections of lack of notability, and being more of an advertisement. That said, it would not be unique to have an article promoting a company which has a slightly different design for a trampoline see Springfree Trampoline for example. At least the conflict of interest is brought out openly by the author. My interests lie more in the competitive realm rather than the recreational one which this trampoline is marketed in. I will post something on the Talk pages of another Trampoline editor that I know to see if he has any further comments, however he has not been active recently and may have retired from Wikipedia. Dabbler (talk) 14:13, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If there are no further objections, I will unprotect the page tomorrow morning.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:55, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected No opinion on quality of article. Lectonar (talk) 09:52, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} 21:38, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:39, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pending changes evidently isn't working thus far and there has been no positive changes by IP's. Azealia911 talk 22:19, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:40, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP keeps re-inserting unsourced information. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 00:44, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:42, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Even though pending changes is already on this page, it is continually being vandalized or bombarded with BLP vios by unregistered users. Intelligentsium 01:32, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Clearly need at least a month of semi-protect. At the moment, literally every IP edit is vandalism or a blp violation. Pending changes won't cut it, at least until Hastert's name drops out of the limelight in a month or two. Safiel (talk) 04:44, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 07:21, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: 10 days of repeated trolling (and a dew attacks) by Winnipeg IPs relating to edits to now-protected Cadbury Caramilk Meters (talk) 03:24, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:21, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 07:17, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:22, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Salted three years ago due to re-creation by a sock. However, I've discovered the article subject is actually notable and I want to write an article. The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 00:20, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a draft article ready to move there? Like it suggests above, it's good to have an article already written up for a salted article subject so it's easily moved and to help confer notability. tutterMouse (talk) 13:40, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I do have an article in userspace that is pretty much GNG ready User:The_Master/sandbox3. The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 00:37, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at it, I think it needs far stronger third-party sourcing to pass WP:GNG and even more so given the field the subject works in (see WP:CREATIVE). If it'll be moved or not will be up to the admin who'll consider the request. tutterMouse (talk) 05:53, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I'd argue that GNG and CREATIVE are separate and that though it's marginal, it does satisfy the letter of GNG (multiple reliable sources...). Multiple is just more than one. But I'll leave it to you guys to determine. The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 01:24, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It scrapes by GNG, the notability policies for creative professionals are seperate so even if it passes GNG (multiple does means more than one but fails on the reliable sourcing front) but yeah, it's not for me to decide but bulk it out, can't have too many references. tutterMouse (talk) 07:00, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging protecting administrator Postdlf MusikAnimal talk 22:32, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I left a note on their talkpage; pinging sometimes misfires. Lectonar (talk) 07:34, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I don't have any opinion; I don't remember this one. postdlf (talk) 18:16, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done No opinion on notability. Lectonar (talk) 07:19, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:56, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:52, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sudden burst of Google Doodle related vandalism. Safiel (talk) 04:34, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:55, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued genre war edits/vandalism of various kind . Second Skin (talk) 05:59, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 06:40, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism for at least 2 days, primarily changing death date to 2016. BilCat (talk) 06:13, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 06:38, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 06:20, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 06:37, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full Protection major edit warring at this articles regarding terminating routes and sourcing. 97.85.118.142 (talk) 21:10, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, please do not sock and use the talk page.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:12, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Gotcha. GoodDay (talk) 00:00, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The article-in-question, has been semi-protected. Therefore, consider request withdrawn. GoodDay (talk) 01:22, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Brianga. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:18, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – On-going edit-warring and fan-cruft editing from IP's and anonymous editors. livelikemusic talk! 00:49, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:16, 28 April 2016 (UTC
Semi-protected by Widr for 48 hours . tutterMouse (talk) 05:24, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – After the last protection expired, the IP sock came back. jps (talk) 02:06, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:59, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 20:58, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf (talk) 21:22, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Widr (talk) 21:26, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf (talk) 00:21, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 00:24, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

29 April 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent spree of vandal edits from IPs and new editors. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:09, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 17:40, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – He appeared at one WWE event, so people are adding that he signed with the company, yet no announcement has been made. He may not sign with them, for example James Storm appeared multiple times for NXT while not signing a contract and is now back with TNA. CrashUnderride 20:10, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 20:53, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and addition of unsourced and speculative content. – Sabbatino (talk) 20:37, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 20:51, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection:I am requesting edit protection for the above-mentioned article. Several IP users made extensive edits to the article to include links which is unrealiable. Their edits have been subjected to malicious undoing such as sockpuppetry, persistent vandalism, as well as disruptive editing. I am requesting edit protection to preserve the hard work I have done as well by other registered users in researching and updating the article.RenRen070193 (talk) 05:51, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 16:03, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Someone with a complaint about the organisation. Rathfelder (talk) 09:29, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 16:02, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This article is constantly being edited by IP addresses who despite the talk page with discussions regarding the matter, still without much contribution to the said discussion, edit the page. This is getting tiresome because the article is constantly being vandalised by these unknown IP addresses. Since the topic itself is also controversial it raises the ire of many within Wikipedia and outside. It's important that this particular article isn't tampered with so that a neutral argument is presented. Vormeph (talk) 12:24, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 16:02, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: The section regarding sundown towns has been deleted numerous times.Alexandra941215 (talk) 15:34, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 16:00, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandal and sockpuppet targets. —IB [ Poke ] 19:13, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:42, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Suggest full as there's no need to edit this until June 30, 2016. –HTD 03:54, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 13:16, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: Vandals returned on the very day that previously existing semi-protection was lifted 45ossington (talk) 13:01, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:02, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: regular IP vandalism. LibStar (talk) 15:48, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:00, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – frequently vandalized by IP users. Donnie Park (talk) 08:55, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:44, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing vandalism by socks who get an account and deface my page. Not just IPs. 7&6=thirteen () 13:32, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:37, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sudden burst of anon/new vandalism. JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 14:16, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:31, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection or Semi-Protection: High level of IP and throwaway account vandalism resumed shortly after semiprotection expired. Normal semiprotection may help somewhat but there is also an existing issue with a sleeper account, submitted for admin review, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Theweditor. Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz (talk) 05:38, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Could use attention, the sooner the better - more IP Vandalism is occurring. Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz (talk) 06:15, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 (talk) 14:11, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – disruptive/NPOV. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 12:36, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 12:49, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. I am forever reverting the page to its Good Article status. It has been temporarily protected so many times. SatDis (talk) 12:46, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 12:48, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism and false information by certain users to misrepresent the city of George Town. Buonkee (talk) 02:50, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, only you (and a bot) edited the article after the last protection expired.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:56, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 11:11, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 12:04, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Same ungrammatical fetishism/homosexuality User:Borcker edits resuming within hours of previous protection expiring. McGeddon (talk) 11:59, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 12:03, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am requesting edit protection for the article death of kendrick johnson. I have made extensive edits to the article to include links to actual case documents. My edits have been subjected to malicious undoing by so called "activists". I am requesting edit protection to preserve the hard work i have done in researching and updating the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paralegal75 (talkcontribs) 00:00, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, this is a content dispute, it can not be solved by just protecting an article. Please use standard dispute resolution avenues.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:51, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User page of a sockpuppet whose controller occasionally revisits old user pages and alters the sock templates. McGeddon (talk) 08:34, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 08:42, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User page of a sockpuppet whose controller occasionally revisits old user pages and alters the sock templates. McGeddon (talk) 08:34, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 08:43, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Just drafted in the 2016 NFL Draft. Been dealing with both persistent vandalism and repeated insertion of factual errors (attempting to re-insert his jersey number from college, which is inaccurate). A very short-term semi-protect should work. ~ RobTalk 02:08, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:55, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Subject of recent events. ViperSnake151  Talk  06:17, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 07:31, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection:The article is consistently being reverted by IP user(s), with removing and changing sourced content, and they have been notified to no avail - FOX 52 (talk) 07:26, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 07:29, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Protection on the article recently expired, which the individual who began vandalizing and edit warring in the article last year recently discovered. Said individual made the same deletions which he had previously done, and also deleted the article's talk page, which I had repeatedly directed him to since October in order to attempt to discuss the issue with him. ALPolitico (talk) 01:13, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:53, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 04:25, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 04:40, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Someone with a dynamic IP address keeps messing with infobox parameters. ChamithN (talk) 04:34, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 04:38, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism, such as in [82] [83]. All by IPs or non-autoconfirmed users. ~ RobTalk 01:04, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 04:23, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Template has 1600+ transclusions. Suggesting semi-protection. (Note that Template:FlagIOCathlete with 5000 transclusions is already template-protected). — Andy W. (talk · contrib) 01:34, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 04:23, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Similar to the other previously-deleted hoax articles, this should be protected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 02:40, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 04:25, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Similar to the other previously-deleted hoax articles, this should be protected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 02:40, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 04:25, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection:

After a one year temporary protection measure in place between 18 April 2015 and 18 April 2016 was lifted, the article almost immediately started to suffer from the same problems again of vandalism and disruptive editing. In the ten days since the last protection measure was lifted, there have been a number of acts of vandalism and disruptive editing. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 00:21, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 04:18, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Ongoing event, attracting IP vandalism by the minute. Please semi-protect for 4-5 hours.bender235 (talk) 00:34, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'd like to second this request. A good deal of vandalism over the past few hours, and it's making it difficult for editors to add actual information from reliable sources as it comes in. ~ RobTalk 03:06, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Bagumba (talk) 04:04, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. TJH2018talk 00:56, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 04:19, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Drug abuse rumors cause high level of IP vandalism. Please semi-protect for 1-2 days for WP:BLP reasons. bender235 (talk) 01:03, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have been reverting vandalism manually for almost an hour now. Could some admin please take care of this? --bender235 (talk) 01:30, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I probably reverted vandalism more than 50 times now. The reaction time on this administrative page has to improve. --bender235 (talk) 03:10, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, thankfully Materialscientist eventually protected the article. --bender235 (talk) 04:11, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 04:19, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Template as 3100+ transclusions. Suggesting at least indefinite semi-protection. (Note how Template:FlagIOC with 6000+ transclusions is template protected.) — Andy W. (talk · contrib) 01:30, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 04:22, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent and extended history of vandalism of BLP article. Optakeover(U)(T)(C) 03:47, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 04:14, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Chase (talk | contributions) 16:28, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 20:41, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page has become a stomping ground for IP's and anonymous editors, following the release of a surprise-release visual album by one of the most highly-profiled musicians in today's music scene. livelikemusic talk! 16:30, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 20:42, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Natg 19 (talk) 22:15, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:07, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition (almost daily) of cherry-picked paper by a hopping IP who was already warned several times. Khruner (talk) 21:19, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 21:21, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nolantron. TJH2018talk 23:07, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator TParis. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:57, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP-hopping troll back soon after protection expired. Edit warring, reverting edits w/o discussion nor consensus. See
AN/Arc919# Disruptive editing, edit-warring, and vandalism by IP-hopper from Kerala, India -and- AN/Arc920# IP-hopping vandal/troll from Kerala, India still at it. Need a permanent solution. Jim1138 (talk) 23:15, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:04, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

30 April 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 19:41, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:46, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection - 2 WP:DUCK socks, see HERE, targetting a WP:BLP.VictoriaGraysonTalk 19:54, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:07, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Linguist 111talk 20:48, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 20:50, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: persistent IP edits POV pushing to alter the birthplace of Buddha ([84], [85], [86] for example) in spite of various talk page discussions and even a note within the text. Dharmalion76 (talk) 16:34, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, pending changes have been already configured, and the editing intensity is not so high.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:08, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of spam links over the years. via HELPDESK. - NQ (talk) 17:42, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:07, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by same IP user.VietPride10 (talk) 18:17, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:05, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full Protection: Full page protection due to malicious editing and constant vandalism. The history on the page is evidence of continued deliberate malicious editing that is factually and intentionally false. Requesting a full page protection with the accurate content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wsb2232 (talkcontribs) 18:44, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Pershing_Benedict — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wsb2232 (talkcontribs) 18:45, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wsb2232 (talk) 18:52, 30 April 2016 (UTC) Wsb2232 (talk) 18:54, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:09, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. An anon keeps reverting recent style edits because, in his view (to paraphrase), Shalim should not be called a god, since he is a pagan god. SamEV (talk) 18:57, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:08, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: No need for create protection because it already exists at YouTube Poop. Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:26, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected by way of page creation. BethNaught (talk) 18:18, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – another recently protected page. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 23:20, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 13:47, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated addition of unsourced information. Uncredited roles are being added to the cast list without a source, and I can't find any source to back them up. Examples: [87] and [88]. Source for cast list: Turner Classic Movies database. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:13, 30 April 2016 (UTC) edit: I'm pretty sure now that this is a hoax. These cast names are not listed at BFI, the Big Comics Database, or even the IMDB. It's tedious to have to keep reverting their addition when someone on a dynamic IP refuses to cite any sources or discuss on the talk page. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:06, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 13:46, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Eric444 (talk) 00:32, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 13:46, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Eric444 (talk) 00:32, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 13:45, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. – Nick Mitchell 98 talk 05:38, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 13:44, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. clpo13(talk) 16:17, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:23, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated additions of unsourced content in violation of WP:BLP by multiple IP editors. Arxiloxos (talk) 17:03, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 17:24, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: The elction's run-offs were held yesterday and with results declared there is a potential high level of IP vandalism. Pahlevun (talk) 10:24, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user is removed sections that needs. Please warn him/her. 5.74.0.223 (talk) 10:26, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., content dispute--Ymblanter (talk) 11:43, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
User:Ymblanter. This is not a content dispute, if it was, I would never engage edit war. The IP, who confessed he is a banned user (GTVM92 (talk · contribs)) is adding wrong/unsourced material. The List of Hope has won 121 seats, but the IP changes it to 125! You can ask any user who know Persian language to verify that. Pahlevun (talk) 11:56, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
User:Ymblanter. The current version of the article contains wrong data. You don't want the article to have wrong data for three days it is a current event? Pahlevun (talk) 11:59, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The other 4 seats is belong to the candidates that belongs to both lists, as you can see in Persian Wikipedia. The user is removed two referenced sections that article needs. 5.74.0.223 (talk) 12:02, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, not done them. We do not protect articles just against one user. It this is vandalism, it should be reported to 3RRN or AIV.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:04, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An anon, possibly with associations to the artist, is reverting legitimate changes and adding bad references to support other changes. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:47, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And there's the IP hopping, which is common for IPV6 addresses. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:47, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:08, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism of chart statistics, particularly of two songs on the list by Green Day, by various users who are suspected/confirmed socks of sockpuppet(s) identified in Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Никита-Родин-2002. Users have also been vandalizing various Billboard-related and Green Day-related articles for months. Previous semi on this article was for three months back in January. I have also documented the vandalism on the article's talk page. MPFitz1968 (talk) 16:03, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:07, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Non-stop disruption by IP-hoppers since 27 April. Zyma (talk) 14:51, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 15:06, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending edits or semi-protection status. The article is having continual vandalism from unregistered users requiring reversions. Josephus37 (talk) 14:57, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 15:06, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – On-going disruptive editing from IP's and anonymous editors, by way of adding in original research that cannot be supported by verifiable sources, and adding in information that completely contradicts sources that are cited within the article. livelikemusic talk! 15:01, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:07, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There's been an edit war on this article over the player's position, mostly by IP editors, but also some established editors. Reliable sources list him as a defensive end while this position doesn't match with the scheme of the team that drafted him. It's unclear what's appropriate to list in the infobox now (if anything), and discussion is needed. ~ RobTalk 04:20, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:01, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IP users who repeatedly disregard WP:FILMPLOT and WP:PLOTSUM and unnecessarily expand the movie's plot. Parsley Man (talk) 19:01, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 13:52, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IP users who repeatedly disregard WP:FILMPLOT and WP:PLOTSUM and unnecessarily expand the movie's plot. Parsley Man (talk) 19:01, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 13:51, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – only been unprotected for a short time, but it won't be left alone. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 23:13, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 13:49, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. Two hours after last semi-protection was lifted, IP vandalism starts again. Please semi-protect for another 2-3 days. --bender235 (talk) 23:15, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 13:48, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Babymissfortune 09:38, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:03, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – As per {{e}}, the same. 333-blue 03:52, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. No edits, only 86 transclusions. Materialscientist (talk) 03:59, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Salt-also the page Khursheed Khan (pro actor) should be salted (I did that as a redirect before looking over the logs and then I realized I actually put up a AFD for it before), anyway sock puppets have recreated this article over and over again!Wgolf (talk) 04:31, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. Widr (talk) 13:45, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and disruptive editing. – Sabbatino (talk) 08:07, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:05, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Principal's name being replaced repeatedly with a pornstar's name. Vandalism from various IPs - Mar11 (talk) 13:23, 30 April 2016 (UTC). Mar11 (talk) 13:23, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 13:43, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection or Semi-Protection: High level of IP and throwaway account vandalism resumed shortly after semiprotection expired. Normal semiprotection may help somewhat but there is also an existing issue with a sleeper account, submitted for admin review, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Theweditor. Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz (talk) 05:38, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Could use attention, the sooner the better - more IP Vandalism is occurring. Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz (talk) 06:15, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 (talk) 14:11, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protection might be better, IP vandalism continues unabated and it's just wasting people's time. diff1 diff2 Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz (talk) 03:50, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Has been upgraded to Semi-protected by Materialscientist, same time length. tutterMouse (talk) 05:15, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism . Joeykai (talk) 16:31, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —Kusma (t·c) 18:48, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sudden burst of Google Doodle related vandalism. Safiel (talk) 04:07, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 04:13, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]