User talk:Sports Devotee

Reviewed

It means that your page is okay and that someone just reviewed it is all, all pages get that. Wgolf (talk) 03:52, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Hello, I'm GiantSnowman. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ken Morton, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Giant Snowman 07:12, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sports Devotee, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Sports Devotee! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Athletics at the 2012 Summer Olympics – Men's 4 × 400 metres relay has been reverted.
Your edit here to Athletics at the 2012 Summer Olympics – Men's 4 × 400 metres relay was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dXiUCmrfcvg) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 06:26, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sports Devotee. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that you shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1) and content (CSD A3) moments after they are created, as you did at Body hound. It is also suggested that pages that might meet CSD A7 criteria not be tagged for deletion immediately after they are created. It's usually best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks. Adam9007 (talk) 15:01, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination for deletion

I have edited Soerabaia 45, an article you have nominated for deletion, and I believe it should be kept. Please revisit the article and review it again. Also please consider if all parts of WP:BEFORE have been followed. Should you thereafter wish to WP:WITHDRAW your nomination, you may add * {{Withdraw}}. ~~~~ to the corresponding page at AfD. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 21:20, 26 April 2016 (UTC) (please mention me on reply)[reply]

Nomination for deletion Story_of_O_-_Chapter_2

Can you please revisit the page nominated for deletion as well as the page Articles_for_deletion/Story_of_O_-_Chapter_2 and if satisfying kindly withdraw the nomination. Thank you! --Mateouso (talk) 05:44, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ali Čair

Hi, I know that the article Ali Čair is getting deleted, but just because it is too short, that dosn't mean you have to delete it, plus, "Too Short To Keep On Wikipedia"" is not such a reason, if you go here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ali_%C4%8Cair, you will see the reason why

From Audi1merc2 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Audi1merc2 (talk • contribs) 15:48, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Sports Devotee. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]