Talk:Home (2015 film)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Home (2015 film) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Film: American / Animated

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Animated films task force.

United States: Animation / Cinema Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Animation portal This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Animation: American / Films / Computer / DreamWorks Animation Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated films work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Computer animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the DreamWorks Animation work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Jennifer Lopez Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jennifer Lopez, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jennifer Lopez on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jennifer LopezWikipedia:WikiProject Jennifer LopezTemplate:WikiProject Jennifer LopezJennifer Lopez articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rihanna Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rihanna, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rihanna on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RihannaWikipedia:WikiProject RihannaTemplate:WikiProject RihannaRihanna articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to Home (2014 animated film). -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:42, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Home (2014 film) → Home (2014 comedy film) – Disambiguate against Home (2014 horror film) per WP:NCF. The primary topic of home is already evident and we do not have a tiered naming convention. BOVINEBOY2008 01:55, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose This film is clearly the primary topic over a independent horror film that doesn't even have a major distributor yet. Koala15 (talk) 04:18, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support WP:NCF; ambiguous disambiguation should not be used. It is clearly not the primary topic as it isn't located at Home, it's been disambiguated. -- 70.50.151.11 (talk) 07:55, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment But it is the primary topic of film's named Home that are being released this year. Koala15 (talk) 14:55, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment that is a secondary topic. BOVINEBOY2008 20:56, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support; the point of disambiguation is to have articles titles that are clearly unambiguous. Tassedethe (talk) 21:48, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination and WP:NCF. Fortdj33 (talk) 22:25, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
May I suggest that Home (2014 animated film) may make it more discernable to the Wikipedia user than labeling it a comedy? Not that it makes a difference in separating it from the horror movie, but I suspect that if you were to ask people to describe the film, they'd be more likely to refer to it being animated or a cartoon than to being a comedy. --Nat Gertler (talk) 22:45, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- I would not be opposed to this. BOVINEBOY2008 22:53, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- That also works for me -- 70.50.151.11 (talk) 02:07, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Semi-protected edit request on 26 March 2015

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Rihanna did not make a concept album for the film, she was the executive producer of its soundtrack, which consists of 8 songs by various artists, including Rihanna. 82.14.201.156 (talk) 17:13, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Gparyani (talk) 19:12, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 29 March 2015

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The plot sections has too many details and the various tabs under the film information page are unnecessary. Could those issues be dealt with? 108.9.69.57 (talk) 01:31, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Amortias (T)(C) 11:23, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Genre

Is this really an animated buddy comedy film? It's more of an animated science fiction comedy film. Yes the buddy element is there but to be honest it's present in most mainstream cartoons. Are we to take it that Lion King, Toy Story, Shrek etc are all buddy films? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.71.162.62 (talk) 13:00, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 1 April 2015

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

This page needs to be edited as soon as possible. The current plot section has too many unnecessary details. 108.9.69.57 (talk) 21:08, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Amortias (T)(C) 21:32, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sequel

Rather than continuing to edit war, folks should chat here about the inclusion of the preliminary information about a sequel. A few notes on the editing notes:

Yes it is common for a sequel to be discussed before the film is released; it is rarely given the actual go-ahead before release.
Home was neither a flop nor a smash, and a sequel is certainly not unthinkable; CGI films which did similar box office have had sequels (Happy Feet Two; Hotel Transylvania 2, Planes: Fire & Rescue).
While WP:CRYSTAL would prevent us from giving an article on a Home 2 at this point, it's not ruling out us including a proper source indicating that some consideration has been given to a sequel any more than it would rule out us including an insider saying that a sequel has been ruled out.

And to be clear on what might be a perceived COI: about two decades ago, I collaborated with Smekday creator Adam Rex on 2 minor projects, unrelated to to Smek/Home. --Nat Gertler (talk) 23:03, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is a fandom of possible Home 2 Joseph Ca98 (talk) 23:23, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image use policy

The picture of Obama visiting the studio does not comply with our WP:Image use policy#Adding images to articles, to wit:

The purpose of an image is to increase readers' understanding of the article's subject matter, usually by directly depicting people, things, activities, and concepts described in the article. The relevant aspect of the image should be clear and central.

Obama is not mentioned in the text, therefore he presumably didn't contribute in any way to the movie, and this was just a PR photo op for him. The picture has no encyclopedic value here, and rather belongs in Public image of Barack Obama. JustinTime55 (talk) 21:15, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Home (2015 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:49, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Home (2015 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402015951/http://www.richardroeper.com/reviews/w/home.aspx to http://www.richardroeper.com/reviews/w/home.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:42, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]