User talk:VietPride10

VietPride10, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi VietPride10! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

23:09, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 25 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Bad Girls Club (season 13) page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Warring

Please stop edit warring and seek consensus for the changes, If you both revert one more time I'll report both of you at AN3 which I really don't want to do so as I said go to the talkpage and get consensus for or against the wrapping thing,
Also I've gave this warning to the other party aswell, Anyway thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 02:10, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've tried seeking consensus with them on their own talk page, over the BBCAN 5 article and also have had the same conversation with them on the BBCAN 5 talk page. I have explained my edits numerous times, and they have continued to ignore me and revert my edits. Also, thank you for the warning/notice. Can you please revert the BB pages back to no warping because I have tried communicating with this user already, and they just revert my edits without a sufficient explanation. Also, another user (User:BlueDevil54)

has also made similar edits regarding the no warping. VietPride10 (talk) 02:37, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well take it to WP:DN or seek a Third opinion, If you don't take it further you'll likely end up blocked, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 03:22, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have tried to talk to User:Bgc7676, on the talk page for Talk:Big Brother Canada (season 5) addressing the issue, and even while making my edits, puting a note in, that if there is a problem, we can adress it in the talk page. However, they have just undone my edits without an explanation. I was wondering if you could intervene? Thank you so much. VietPride10 (talk) 05:37, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cody Nickson's Age

Where in the live feed did Cody admit he lied about his age? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drewreliford (talk • contribs) 23:35, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don't remember the exact time, but I distinctly remember him admitting to Jessica that he has a daughter and is actually 32. The only inaccurate age is Christmas' (whos 35 not 33) VietPride10 (talk) 23:42, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FIND OUT FOR ME PLEASE — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drewreliford (talk • contribs) 00:13, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Celebrity Big Brother

I see you editing quite a bit on Big Brother 19 (U.S.) so I thought I would let you know that I created Celebrity Big Brother 1 (U.S.) if you would like to help add to it. Thanks in advance!!! TheDoctorWho (talk) 03:53, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!, thank you so much for creating that page. I think we should list this under season 2 of the "digital edition" since its only going to be on CBS All Access, and should not have its own separate categoryVietPride10 (talk) 04:47, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disregard what I just said, I just realized it will air on CBS VietPride10 (talk) 04:48, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was just about to ask about that. I thought maybe I read wrong. Thank you for any contributions you will make for or about the article.TheDoctorWho (talk) 04:51, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, VietPride10. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Experiences survey

The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (led by the Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) is conducting a survey for en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.

The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:

https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/2017_AN/Incidents_Survey_Privacy_Statement

If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.

Sign up here to receive a link to a survey

Please be aware this survey will close Friday, Dec. 8 at 23:00 UTC.

Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 21:14, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Your recent editing history at Survivor: Ghost Island shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. only (talk) 19:53, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question

I probably should've asked this before I removed it but I didn't think of it until afterwards. You nominated the page Cody Nickson for speedy deletion (which I don't have a problem with). I believe I'm considered the original creator of the article because I created the original redirect however I did not create the article that currently exists there now. Did I have a right in removing the speedy deletion tag or should I revert and contest on the talk page? TheDoctorWho (talk) 01:31, 14 March 2018 (UTC) I'm so sorry for causing confusion, I was trying to refer to the person that made Cody Nickson an actual article instead of reverting it back to the BB19 houseguest page. Again, sorry for the confusion. VietPride10 (talk) 03:06, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

THE POWER OF VETO

STOP REVERTING. 90.204.40.149 (talk) 01:20, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

United States House of Representatives elections in California, 2018

Hi VietPride10 I saw you took off the District 5 vote count. And I would like to know why and here is the website I found the votes on. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/06/05/us/elections/results-california-primary-elections.html Thanks:96.36.68.29 (talk) 22:00, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!, thank you for your edits on the page. I only removed your edit is because AP has not called the Top 2 winners in that district yet, I think we should wait until the AP calls all the Top 2 candidates advancing before we edit those races. VietPride10 (talk) 22:02, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks. And If you can next time please try to use your Edit summary thanks.96.36.68.29 (talk) 22:05, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Survivor: Cambodia

Hello,

What's wrong with the real names on some of the contestants, as in the ones that previously competed? Martinc1994 (talk) 02:14, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We dont need to put their official names as those have been put in their original season. Also the Cambodia cast pre release did not release their full names. VietPride10 (talk) 03:30, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Maintaining and keeping articles on all 435 congressional districts is a Herculean task, and I just wanted to let you know that your contributions have not gone unnoticed or unappreciated. Keep it up! Mélencron (talk) 02:04, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NY Senate elections

New York State Senate elections, 2018

Article is published and ready for you to plug in all your content! Thanks for collaborating on this. Nevermore27 (talk) 22:01, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Election

next time write reason in edit summary עם ישראל חי (talk) 14:13, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edits on Elections

"Congressional District" should be capitalized, it is referring to a specific district, ex. 8th Congressional District. It looks grammatically wrong for it to be lowercase. There are several academic/professional grammar sources that have this opinion as well (Chicago Manual of Style, Associated Press, etc.) As for the gain/bar formatting, I was debating on what format to use, but I do think I'll do the full bar now instead of stopping it where I was. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GavinTheViking (talk • contribs) 19:54, 15 November 2018 (UTC) It is a proper noun when referring to a specific congressional district. Alone, "congressional district" should be lowercase, but "8th Congressional District" should be capitalized. Here's some academic sources to explain it better (Ctrl+F "congressional district" to find the spots in the links): https://www.tamut.edu/academics/gbugh/PoliticalScience/ChicagoGuideforPoliticalScience.htm https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GPO-STYLEMANUAL-2008/pdf/GPO-STYLEMANUAL-2008-6.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by GavinTheViking (talk • contribs) 20:19, 15 November 2018 (UTC) Alright. But when you put "N/A" in the Party section for Write-Ins, make sure to remove that table entry's 'with party link', so that there isn't a link to the "N/A" wikipedia page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GavinTheViking (talk • contribs) 21:19, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nevada elections, 2018, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Catherine Byrne (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, VietPride10. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Map requests

Sorry for the late reply! I have the next two weeks off from school, so I'll most likely have time to make these maps. --Mr.Election (talk) 05:28, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PA special

Hi, I reverted recent changes to an election article. At rough look, it appears potentially useful data was deleted and something non grammatical was added. Feel free to undo my revert if there's a real reason. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 02:21, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Celebrity Big Brother 2 Table

Hey VietPride10 just curious why did you change the Houseguests table for Celebrity Big Brother 2 (U.S. season)? The format that was implemented is a newer format that is scalable to the reader's display (like mobile phones, and various desktop resolutions) and reduces unused space on the article. It was discussed over at WT:BIGBRO and no has objected to the format as I've been rolling it out on Big Brother (UK TV series). Just curious as to why the change back to the old format? Alucard 16_{❯❯❯ chat?} 19:33, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Alucard 16: My apologies, I was just following the format from the past CBB article and the other Big Brother US table formatsVietPride10 (talk) 19:34, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Its okay no worries I was just curious. Might be best to keep it the same as the other US articles for the time being actually now that I think of it. Alucard 16_{❯❯❯ chat?} 19:36, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An invitation to discussion

I kindly invite you to the discussion on Template talk:Infobox election#The Bolding issue to decide whether to bold the winner in the election infobox. Lmmnhn (talk) 19:22, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2012 United States House of Representatives elections in Florida, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steve Southerland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2012 United States House of Representatives elections in Louisiana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Fleming (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate parms in Infobox election

I reverted your reversion on 2012 United States House of Representatives elections in Maryland because you introduced duplicate "last_election1" and "last_election2" parms.

As you can see in the "Warning:" message at the top of the edit screen when you press "Show preview", when there are more than one of a given parm in a template, only the last one is used. So for two "last_election1" parms, only the second value ("6") shows in the displayed Infobox; the first value ("60.48%") doesn't show.

You can see an example of how to code it in the "Infobox Election" documentation.

If other election articles have such duplicate parms, they're wrong.

Davemck (talk) 06:21, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Davemck: I apologize, I didn't edit it carefully, I have re-edited the article without adding in the duplicate parameters. Thanks VietPride10 (talk) 07:08, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:American Independent Party/meta/shortname

Please do not remove the {{nowrap}} in the template as it messed up the layout in the election infoboxes, particularly the infobox for 1968 United States presidential election. --Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 06:44, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! --Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 06:44, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 United States House of Representatives elections in California, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page East Los Angeles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Survivor: Winners at War

You might want to self-revert. Editors can remove the prod (it's AFD notice that they can't remove), and once an editor has removed it, you're not supposed to put it back. See WP:PROD for details. Schazjmd (talk) 01:11, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies

The undo was a misclick that I did not notice happened. Sorry about that. Carry on. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:52, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 United States House of Representatives elections in Ohio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Green Township, Ohio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:06, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:59, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 New Jersey gubernatorial election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Monmouth County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020 United States Senate election in Virginia

Hello VietPride - In your recent edit (diff) you changed "Omari Faulkner, business executive, U.S. Navy reservist, professor, author, former State Department Envoy" to "Omari Faulkner, business executive and former U.S. State Department official". I see a rationale for making the candidate's description less wordy. At the same time, since we note the military affiliation for two other candidates (both Army veterans), to be fair I believe we should note that Faulkner is in the U.S. Navy Reserve. What do you think? - Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk) (I'm a man—traditional male pronouns are fine.) 13:48, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, my apologies for deleting Faulkner's military affiliation. I will add it back.VietPride10 (talk) 15:07, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No worries at all. Thanks! - Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk) (I'm a man—traditional male pronouns are fine.) 19:14, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Restoration PAC

I have severe reservations about polls sponsored by the hyper-political Restoration PAC[1] which has been running negative ads against Michigan senator Gary Peters such as at [2]. Did you bother to check the links I provided in the Talk:2020_United_States_Senate_election_in_Michigan page? If you still want to keep the Restoration PAC polls in, I INSIST that there be a disclaimer that shows Restoration PAC's partisan political activites regarding the 2020 United States Senate election in Michigan. Steelbeard1 (talk) 16:18, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Steelbeard1: I understand that, however they are still scientific polls. We can make a footnote stating which candidates they are supporting, but partisan polls have always been added if you look at other election articles.VietPride10 (talk) 17:15, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The footnote is fine. Steelbeard1 (talk) 13:35, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please feel free to add the footnote to the articles if you haven't done so already. VietPride10 (talk) 15:38, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 United States House of Representatives elections in Ohio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DCCC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 United States House of Representatives elections in Florida, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Medicare.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:27, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decimals

Hey I noticed that you changed the results in the election boxes from 2 decimal places to 1 on the 2020 United States House of Representatives elections in Florida page. I know that E&R distinguishes between pre-'32 and post-'32 elections (the prior being my specialty). For pre-'32, the standard is 2 decimal places. I don't know what the standard is for post-'32 as I've seen both 1 and 2 decimal places (sometimes even on the same article, like on 2020 United States Senate election in Maine), but wouldn't 2 decimal places be more intuitive as it is more exact? Curbon7 (talk) 04:39, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don't believe there is a standard, I changed it to one decimal place because most US house articles it at one decimal, but I'll change it back as it is more exactVietPride10 (talk) 05:00, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! AllegedlyHuman (talk) 01:05, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 Nevada elections, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Hutchinson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:32, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cast of America's Next Top Model Cycle 24.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cast of America's Next Top Model Cycle 24.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

empty footnote?

Hi VietPride10! I saw in this edit, you added an empty footnote. I removed it for now, but just wanted to let you know in case you wanted to add it back with content.

Let me know if you need any assistance; I had seen the article listed in Category:Pages with missing references list. = paul2520 💬 21:56, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

...actually, it appears you added this note on several pages, also listed in that category! I'll leave them as-is for now. = paul2520 💬 21:58, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Polling edit

Hello, I saw you reverted my edit and I saw you ask why I switched the poll order that they came out on the same day. I did this because the Trafalgar poll had a larger sample size and a smaller margin of error. I understand your idea of using the poll that took a shorter amount of time to complete to "break the tie". No complaints, but since you asked, I wanted to let you know my reasoning. Keep up the good work, I enjoy that we are both normally the first to insert polls! GeorgeBailey (talk) 04:30, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 Arizona gubernatorial election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Hill.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

S.C. Supreme Court

Just wanted to let you know that I amended your addition to this page to correctly list the law school that the newly elected justice attended! Thanks for adding him though! Philipnelson99 (talk) 04:02, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Philipnelson99: Thank you! My apologies. Being from California, I automatically assumed USC referred to University of Southern California.VietPride10 (talk) 04:30, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Totally understandable! Thanks again for helping to keep that page up-to-date! Philipnelson99 (talk) 04:32, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hyperlinking

Your edit on Willow project was reverted by user mberney- BLM was already spelled out and you added a link back in , which is called hyperlinking. Wuerzele (talk) 17:26, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Your recent Bold edit was Reverted. Per BRD, it's time for us to Discuss this on the talk page. Please don't edit war by reinstating the edit. Let's see if a consensus can form to keep it or an alternate version. Bettering the Wiki (talk) 07:02, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Political party

If you read the actual citation you used, it says "{NAME} is a Democrat." Not "Democratic". That makes no sense. Snickers2686 (talk) 20:58, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Snickers2686: Why is this a problem now exactly? These same sources have been used in the past Biden nominees and there was zero problem (apparently until today). The section is under "political party", which requires a noun which is the Democratic Party. What you're referring to is using it as an adjective, which is fine when characterizing what the nominee is, like on Eumi K. Lee or Ana de Alba's article in the personal life section.VietPride10 (talk) 21:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So because it's done that way in the past that makes it okay? Sounds like sound policy! Snickers2686 (talk) 19:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Snickers2686: You don't need to take my word for it, look on every single US politician that's a "Democrat", what is listed under the political party section of their infobox?VietPride10 (talk) 20:30, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, what I'm asking is...show me the policy that says that's how it is supposed to be Snickers2686 (talk) 23:53, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And I'd watch how many times you revert because you're in violation of WP:3RR Snickers2686 (talk) 23:56, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Snickers2686: It is an established norm (as you have often mention in your edit summaries) that US Democrats are listed under the Democratic party designation in the infobox. If you want to change it, you have to change it for ALL pages (good luck with that). You're clearly in the minority here (and I'm not really sure why). We can settle this with an 3rd opinion/dispute resolution if you want. Also you were already in violation of the 3 revert rule when you reverted me 3x, #1, #2, #3. All within 5 hours!

So take your own advice, thanks.VietPride10 (talk) 00:14, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We're done here. Snickers2686 (talk) 01:04, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024 Michigan elections, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC News.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]