User talk:Martinc1994

Your submission at Articles for creation: Francesca Marie Smith (October 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Francesca Marie Smith and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 06:56, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello! Martinc1994, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 06:56, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Peter Cugno for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter Cugno is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Cugno until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jack Frost (talk) 06:02, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Deletion of Peter Cugno

Hi Martin, To answer your question from here, it appears that Peter Cugno does not appear to meet the criteria for notability of entertainers such as voice actors. Unfortunately, if subjects are not sufficiently notable, they do not qualify for an article on Wikipedia. If you disagree with this, you will need to provide evidence of significant coverage in reliable sources. If you have any further questions, feel free to {ping} me, or ask me at my talk page. Finally, please don't be disheartened if your article is deleted, many people's first few articles are deleted for one reason or another; I'd suggest using the articles for creation process, and you can always head over to the teahouse for help. Regards, --Jack Frost (talk) 07:07, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lyon Smith

Hello, Martinc1994. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Lyon Smith, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Lyon Smith to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

CASSIOPEIA (talk) 07:10, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Peter Cugno.

The article Peter Cugno. has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Victão Lopes ^Fala! 22:52, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Peter Cugno.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Peter Cugno.. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Peter Cugno. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Peter Cugno. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Biwom (talk) 07:06, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lyon Smith

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lyon Smith requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:12, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Danielle Judovits (December 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Danielle Judovits and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Danielle Judovits, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:51, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Danielle Judovits (December 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Danielle Judovits and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Danielle Judovits, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 11:29, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Danielle Judovits (January 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Drover's Wife was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Danielle Judovits and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Danielle Judovits, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Drover's Wife (talk) 09:31, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Amos Crawley

Hello, Martinc1994,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Amos Crawley should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amos Crawley .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Elmidae (talk · contribs) 03:58, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Danielle Judovits (March 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chenzw was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Danielle Judovits and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Danielle Judovits, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chenzw  Talk  11:17, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Lyon Smith concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Lyon Smith, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Lyon Smith

Hello, Martinc1994. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lyon Smith".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl | talk 18:02, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Danielle Judovits

Hello, Martinc1994. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Danielle Judovits".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor 22:46, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Martinc1994. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Moving pages

Don't move pages from long standing titles unless there has been a discussion. Sure there are multiple Richard Harris (disambiguation) but Richard Harris is the most common so he does not need a disambiguated title. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:02, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Oh, sorry about that. I was testing out the "Move" feature and I got carried away. Martinc1994 (talk) 06:21, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

BTVA credits

On Behind The Voice Actors, the only credits that can be cited are the ones that they have checkmarked in green, and point to screenshots of closing credits. The citation you did with Yuri Lowenthal filmography did not have that for Wild Arms 4, so I had to revert this. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 13:56, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

May 2020

Hello, I'm Magitroopa. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 01:13, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

What did I edit? Martinc1994 (talk) 01:15, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

You added filming dates to the article of season 1 and 2 of The Masked Singer with no source whatsoever. Should also be noted that you added them in, but they didn't show up anyways because the articles use Template:Infobox reality talent competition, which does not use film_start and film_end - you're probably thinking of Template:Infobox television season which does include those (but are not used on The Masked Singer season aritcles...). Magitroopa (talk) 01:20, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

My apologies for those. I just wanted to give them a try.

List of Thomas & Friends Railway Engines

I told the anonymous user on to stop the editing that it does on List of Thomas & Friends railway engines Ee2mba (talk) 21:43, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

What was that user's response? No matter what we do, it keeps on doing it. Martinc1994 (talk) 02:01, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Not responded yet Ee2mba (talk) 03:41, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Oh, okay. No matter what we do, that person keeps on doing it. I cannot take it anymore. I just wanted it the way it properly was. Martinc1994 (talk) 21:27, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

We should semi-protect the page as anonymous users cannot edit semi-protected pages and if the person creates an account and does it then we will know that the person created an account to edit the page. Ee2mba (talk) 03:59, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

That's what I was thinking. The question is how can we do that? As long as this keeps happening, I probably may as well give up on it. Martinc1994 (talk) 02:53, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

I am fed up with this person. We need to find out how to semi-protect the page. Ee2mba (talk) 19:38, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

I know, right? They keep erasing Rosie, Molly, and Whiff even though they do belong in that category. Who is going to believe us? Martinc1994 (talk) 19:59, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

I have good news. The page has been protected! Ee2mba (talk) 23:35, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Yes, it is, thanks to my requesting it. I don't if it will last, but I'm glad it worked. Martinc1994 (talk) 23:42, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Bad news! The page was unprotected. Ee2mba (talk) 17:55, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

That's fine. If that user becomes more of a repeat offender. I'll ask for a longer protection period. Martinc1994 (talk) 19:41, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Now the person is erasing Neville, Hank, Flora, Pip, Emma, Diesel 10, and Bear in addition to Rosie, Molly and Whiff Ee2mba (talk) 00:42, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

I already reverted it. Let's see how long it keeps up. Martinc1994 (talk) 01:13, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

A lot of engines are getting deleted.- Ee2mba (talk) 15:38, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Thomas & Friends railway engines for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Thomas & Friends railway engines is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Thomas & Friends railway engines until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 18:15, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Re: Kamen Rider Ex-Aid characters

Please do not change the names in the Kamen Rider Ex-Aid page. I get that everyone on the show is largely referred to by their first names, but WP:SURNAME says characters are to be referred to by their last names unless there are multiple characters with the same last name. This is why I left Kuroto and Masamune Dan alone, but used everyone else's last names. Blazewing16 (talk) 23:00, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

There was also Hiiro and his father though. Martinc1994 (talk) 00:06, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

I completely forgot. I'll address that when I have time. Blazewing16 (talk) 23:15, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

January 2024

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Drmies (talk) 17:41, 7 January 2024 (UTC)