User talk:Sixth of March

Welcome!

Hello, Sixth of March! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{Ping|I dream of horses}} to your message. ^{(talk to me) (My edits)} @ 14:34, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

I only removed maintenance templates from Vince and Kath that are inappropriate especially the ones that you added. All the references of the article was reliable. Please take time to read and understand the references. Thank you. RSM Labag 08:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RSMLabag, the only reliable source added there came from ABS-CBN News, the rest are not. For you to identify what reliable sources are, read WP:RS. Sixth o f March 13:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sixth of March, so you're telling me that the ONLY reliable source added there came from ABS-CBN News because it's a news organization but the others are not? How about the references that came from Trending News Portal, Coolbuster, The Summit Express, and The Daily Pedia? Those sites are not news organizations but they still belong on Biased or opinionated sources according to WP:RS. RSM Labag 13:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help This is 49.149.xxx.xxx is Sockpuppet and Blockuser User:JeSuisBilly

This is Block user of User:JeSuisBilly is User_talk:49.149.168.95 has created of harassment of users and Personal Attacks on Users page like some word of "Added Content" on korean drama page as spams and vandalism forgot them page yourself please help LG-Gunther : Talk 07:49, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to DXKR

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Dcirovic (talk) 02:36, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

TV5 Channel 33 Roxas

Hello, to clarify those thing especially in TV5 Channel 33 in Roxas, Capiz. The answer is officially confirm and operational as of this time. TV5 Channel 33 Roxas is a relay station on TV5 in Manila was launch last March 2015 (Last year) in fact it is almost a year already. The actual TV5 Channel 33 is located the Iloilo-Capiz National Highway, Brgy. Cabugao, Roxas City, Capiz. At first it it was a hoax, but now it is official even pocket TV mobile can received now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.95.118.59 (talk) 15:26, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I undid your edit because the article you're linking to does not exist. Nonexistent articles can be identified with a red link and such links should be avoided in navboxes per WP:EXISTING. And I think they are one of the roots of hoaxes in Wikipedia, especially in Philippine media. Sixth o f March 21:15, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Notre Dame of Midsayap College

Hi, I had to decline a speedy deletion as no criteria apply. Please go to Wikipedia:Templates for discussion if you still want to argue the case for deletion. Fences&Windows 00:22, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

Hi Sixth of March. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war.
If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Widr (talk) 19:02, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:112.211.75.95 is User:TV5Ozamiz Sock Alert

This is User:TV5Ozamiz IP Sock is User talk:112.211.75.95 as vandalism alert like some as hoaxes and vandalism Please Help. LG-Gunther : Talk 04:03, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Radyo Kabayan

Just in case you are interested. An article you had PROD d, was deleted. It has since been restored as an editor requested it back on my talk page. -- GB fan 17:37, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes! FM Branding Hoax

Hi 6th of March (I abbreviated your name already to make this a simple one), I'm concerning to DWYS article recently. They're keep adding unsourced and unpredictable branding of that station. Right now I'm proposing a temporary semi-protection for it to prevent it from adding those unverifiable materials again. And also, I think that the recent edits of 180.191.131.203 and 180.191.130.138 are the same, since they're pertaining this word on their edits CHANGE IS COMING (which is also the tagline of Pres. Rodrigo Duterte in his election candidacy). Can you please assist on this? I'd really appreciate your help. Hamham31 Heke!KushKush! 01:04, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Your recent editing history at Myx shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Cbrittain10 (talk|contribs) 13:26, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template displacement seems unnecessary

Why do you keep removing navigational box on several pages? I think some of your edits were not necessary because the templates you removed are useful to the readers. And please, stop edit warring. Jcmpineda (talk) 12:18, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jcmpineda, I removed the templates from those articles considering that most of its links lead to the same article which is Tarlac State University. I've explained it in my edit summaries in case you didn't see it. Anyway, where do you think I made an edit war? If you're referring to the one I made at Myx, I'm just reverting the edits made there by an IP-hopping vandal whose main target is that article. Sixth o f March 17:18, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Sixth of March: Okay, I got it. Thank you for making it clear. Jcmpineda (talk) 07:46, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deceitful PROD nominations

If I ever see the tactic you used at DXYQ, DWAD-AM, DXJL and Balitang Bayan Numero Uno again I will block you. You added a PROD template to each of those articles and then commented it out so it does not show up when someone reviews the article. Then after 7 days you uncommented it out so that it now shows up in the article and the PROD listing of PRODs due to be deleted. That is deceitful and I will not tolerate it. If you feel those articles should be deleted you have one option and that is to take them to AFD. -- GB fan 20:22, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know, I have looked at your deleted contributions and now see that this tactic has worked in the past. I will be restoring the ones I find where you used this tactic. I will also be posting this to WP:AN to let other admins know about this tactic. I will let you know when I have posted there. -- GB fan 20:33, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification that I have mentioned you in a post at WP:AN concerning this topic. -- GB fan 23:11, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Deceitful PRODs, just so you have no problems finding it. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 00:45, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain

I would like an explanation of your rationale - both the hidden Prod's and hidden project banners. I can't imagine a good reason, but maybe my imagination is too limited.--S Philbrick (Talk) 23:56, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Sixth of March. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Sixth of March. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]