User talk:Vormeph

April 2016

Just to let you know that the inclusion of Scotland as an entry under the United Kingdom has been discussed at the talkpage of Reactions to the 2016 Brussels bombings. Please contribute to that rather than seeking to start an edit-war. AusLondonder (talk) 09:31, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Katie^talk 12:52, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User page personal attacks

I have removed the personal attack against User:Rwenonah and User:LjL from your user page. Having had a similar attack list removed previously, you should have known better, and if I see anything like that again I will block you indefinitely (if someone else doesn't block you first). Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:57, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Boing! said Zebedee: I'm sure your brain will work out what's best for the situation. But now I'll just sit back and watch the actors roll while the curtains close. You can go play along with your admin powers and can block me for as much as you want, because that is all you can do as far as your superiors are concerned. Of course, @KrakatoaKatie: would embrace you to know that blocking a user won't solve problems at all. And if my comments about dates and love, and reality and politics are but personal attacks, then surely Wikipedia itself is a personal attack of every thing and one which you two yearn to desire. In either case, it is you who is most guilty of crime for blocking someone when they have commmitted very little. As I have contributed the most to resolving disputes in the Iran issue, I ought to be commended for being diplomatic. As for you, when I return I'll make both your stays a magnificent one. :-) Vormeph (talk) 13:57, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Katie^talk 14:02, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Vormeph (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #15808 was submitted on May 18, 2016 14:32:18. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 14:32, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Did you seriously just accuse two editors of being "guilty of crime" for blocking you pursuant to WP:ANI incidents? How could you possibly think that would lessen your blocks, and how can you possibly be asking for your block to be lifted at this point, immediately following your talk page access being removed? First you put me and a bunch of other editors on, literally, a "naughty list" of "bullies" for reporting you (even though I had never reported you for anything at that point, incidentally), then after you're blocked the first time around, you half-heartedly dish out apologies to every individual concerned on Talk:Iran, but then, when your further attempt to have it exactly your way is met with opposition, you go back to the initial behavior of "raging" and singling out editors (including again me) as nationalists or nationalism-supporters (?!). This is what factually happened in a nutshell, and in my opinion, it could honestly be summarized even further by saying that you begged to be blocked. LjL (talk) 15:20, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Vormeph. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]