Jump to content

User talk:AusLondonder

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

AfD - Lavender Greens

[edit]

Reply

[edit]
Hello, AusLondonder. You have new messages at Mlaffs's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

We're on Twitter!

[edit]
WikiLGBT is on Twitter!
Hello AusLondonder!
Follow the Wikimedia LGBT user group on Twitter at @wikilgbt for news, photos, and other topics of interest to LGBT Wikipedans and allies. Use #wikiLGBT to share any Wiki Loves Pride stuff that you would like to share (whether this month or any day of the year) or to alert folks to things that the LGBT Wikipedan community should know. RachelWex (talk)

Women in Red World Contest

[edit]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

January 2020 at Women in Red

[edit]
January 2020, Volume 6, Issue 1, Numbers 146, 148, 149, 150, 151, 153


Happy Holidays from all of us at Women in Red, and thank you for your support in 2019. We look forward to working with you in 2020!

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

Join the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!

[edit]

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project invites you to join us again this October and November, the two months which are dedicated to improving content about the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand contents in Wikimedia projects which are connected to this scope. Kindly list your username under the participants section to indicate your interest in participating in this contest.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

  • Overall winner
    • 1st - $500
    • 2nd - $200
    • 3rd - $100
  • Diversity winner - $100
  • Gender-gap fillers - $100
  • Language Winners - up to $100*

We would be adding additional categories as the contest progresses, along with local prizes from affiliates in your countries. For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. Looking forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 19:22, 22nd September 2020 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Welcome to the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!

[edit]

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project core team is happy to inform you that the Months of African Cinema Contest is happening again this year in October and November. We invite Wikipedians all over the world to join in improving content related to African cinema on Wikipedia!

Please list your username under the participants’ section of the contest page to indicate your interest in participating in this contest. The term "African" in the context of this contest, includes people of African descent from all over the world, which includes the diaspora and the Caribbean.

The following prizes would be recognized at the end of the contest:

  • Overall winner
    • 1st - $500
    • 2nd - $200
    • 3rd - $100
  • Diversity winner - $100
  • Gender-gap fillers - $100
  • Language Winners - up to $100*

Also look out for local prizes from affiliates in your countries or communities! For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. We look forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 23:20, 30th September 2021 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Women in Red January 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | January 2024, Volume 10, Issue 1, Numbers 291, 293, 294, 295, 296


Online events:

Announcement

  • In 2024 Women in Red also has a one biography a week challenge as part
    of the #1day1woman initiative!

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

Free Church of England

[edit]

It seems that you are attempting to remove several pages from the Free Church of England pages including the deletion of the page for one of their bishops. Please remove these spurious requests for deletion - the FCE is a GAFCON body, part of the third largest communion of Christians (after Roman Catholics and Eastern Orthodox). Arrowe6365 (talk) 21:27, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All articles must meet notability requirements. You should not be creating BLPs with zero secondary sources. By the way, the Anglican Communion is the third-largest Christian denomination. AusLondonder (talk) 21:36, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
These articles do meet notability requirements.
As I have already said, GAFCON is part of the third largest Christian denomination, the Anglican Communion is also part of that same denomination. Impaired communion with the Archbishop of Canterbury doesn't make a new denomination, just a different alignment - the whole point of GAFCON (of which the FCE is a part).
I will be honest (given the leanings that are clear from your talk page), it comes across as an attack against a body with which you personally disagree. Arrowe6365 (talk) 22:25, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No idea what the last part of your message refers to. How about you add secondary sources when creating articles and we won't have an issue? It's really that simple. The Free Church of England is clearly not part of the Anglican Communion and to suggest otherwise is simply ludicrous. While BISHOPS is a ridiculous essay it explicitly refers to "Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, Lutheran and Anglican Communion bishops" AusLondonder (talk) 22:41, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024 at Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | September 2024, Volume 10, Issue 9, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 316, 317


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:55, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Amara Bangoura (diplomat)

[edit]

Hi, AusLondonder, how are you? I may be wrong, but I don't think we can delete a page as A7 if it contains a clear claim of significance such as "ambassador to Russia" – as long as that is a credible claim (even if unsourced or not supported by the source cited, as here). What's your take on that? Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:06, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Justlettersandnumbers: I'm good hope you're doing well. Yeah fair enough you're probably right, there's a large number of these articles created by the same indefinitely blocked editor with no secondary sources and most of them lacking any substantive content and completely out of date, I've been slowing prodding them, just thought I'd try a CSD but I knew it was stretching it! AusLondonder (talk) 11:12, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Yes, I think prod should work, it's effectively an unsourced BLP. Thanks for all the great stuff you do, including slowly clearing out this dross, of which there's still far too much. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:17, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for that nice message, appreciate it :) AusLondonder (talk) 12:23, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:LGBT YouTube celebrities has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

Category:LGBT YouTube celebrities has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:48, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Organisations based in Pietermaritzburg

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Organisations based in Pietermaritzburg indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 20:33, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: Hi there Liz do you know what article was in this category before it became empty? Is there some way to check? AusLondonder (talk) 23:29, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would appreciate it if you could review the edit request on Talk: Gold Apollo AR924

[edit]

I have proposed an update to the Gold Apollo AR924 entry, as the current information appears to be outdated and inaccurate. Thank you for considering these changes, and I look forward to your feedback. 58.152.168.150 (talk) 16:27, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Venezuela Solidarity Campaign for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Venezuela Solidarity Campaign is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Venezuela Solidarity Campaign until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Janhrach (talk) 16:26, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

re: heather chaplet category revertions

[edit]

Thx, sometimes it's a little hazy if i'm stretching the categories, her work is all about fashion and sustainability and all that so figured those categories were appropriate. I'm learning as I go with the category thing, it's the one edit type that perhaps perplexes me more than any others. Gregorcollins (talk) 18:02, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gregorcollins: Hi there, no worries, categorisation can be a bit confusing. Generally very broad categories such as say Category:Cotton don't belong on biographies. If you look at the cotton category it mostly contains articles about cotton products etc. WP:CATSPECIFIC gives some general advice on this. AusLondonder (talk) 16:00, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
got it thx Gregorcollins (talk) 18:09, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Diplomats and honours

[edit]

Just noticed your comment here and really had to laugh:

Actually, only a small minority of diplomats receive high honours (i.e. CBE and above), especially in the modern day. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:26, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I decided to have a look at some British ambassadors to see whether this is accurate. Surprise, surprise, it wasn't. Menna Rawlings, ambassador to France, DCMG CVO. Karen Pierce, ambassador to the US, DCMG. Nigel Casey, ambassador to Russia, CMG MVO. Julia Longbottom, ambassador to Japan, CMG. Jill Gallard, ambassador to Germany, CMG CVO. Martin Harris, ambassador to Ukraine, OBE CMG. Alex Ellis, ambassador to Spain, KCMG. Notice a peculiar pattern here? A walled garden of articles, some with zero secondary sources (completely unacceptable for a BLP), of British diplomats awarded honours by their employer. AusLondonder (talk) 13:58, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have literally picked some of the most important of all UK ambassadors! Talk about cherrypicking to try to prove you're right. Try picking some lesser ambassadors or, indeed, all the other thousands of diplomats who aren't ambassadors (after all, I did say a small minority of diplomats, not ambassadors!). No, don't bother to reply. I know your opinions very well by now. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:35, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comments, I except some of those articles will be going to AfD soon given lack of secondary sources. Ambassadors are not inherently notable, nor are they notable because their employer gave them an award. AusLondonder (talk) 11:23, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bernadette Thompson moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Bernadette Thompson. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because a new user gamed autoconfirmed to promote their userspace draft to mainspace without review. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Cabayi (talk) 11:48, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cabayi: Is this just a courtesy notification as I did some categorisation work as it's not my article? AusLondonder (talk) 11:51, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is. Cabayi (talk) 11:55, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Italian sex offenders

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Italian sex offenders indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 18:17, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red October 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | October 2024, Volume 10, Issue 10, Numbers 293, 294, 318, 319, 320


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Unsure how to expand a stub article? Take a look at this guidance

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:04, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Thank you for cleaning of DinosaursLoveExistence (talk · contribs)'s categories Mason (talk) 14:24, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! 😀 AusLondonder (talk) 14:54, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

unconstructive revert

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Kerbin fellow. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kerbin fellow (talk) 17:04, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kerbin fellow: I did explain why. Your edit is unconstructive and has been reverted previously. AusLondonder (talk) 17:08, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good work

[edit]

I just want to say good work for cleaning up all the mess in the bilateral related articles space. I too have a similar interest. LibStar (talk) 04:04, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that, LibStar! I've noticed your good work in the area as well. There's a lot of rubbish but I think we're getting there. AusLondonder (talk) 04:20, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ambassadors

[edit]

I really think we should limit specific Ambassadors to X categories to people who were resident ambassadors in that country. Otherwise we should limit people to being in just Ambassadors of Y for their sending country. All people who we have reliable sources for should be in Ambassadors of Y for the country they represented, that is a defining link. Only those who we have strong evidence the particular country they were assigned to is defining should be in a category for that country. Since Ambassadors are a sub-cat of diplomats, people who are in Ambassadors of France should not also be in French diplomats. I also think we should rename diplomats cats to Diplomats of Foo. So Diplomats of France. In Diplomats what is defining is the country that employed you, not nationality. People who are French people who were Diplomats for something or someone other than France should be categorized based on that and not be in the Diplomats of France category. We really have way too much category bloat with ambassadors and Diplomats. Especially the huge problem of probably 1,000 categories or more with just 1 article. Thank-you for the nominations you have made to upmerge small categories. There are a lot. However since the issues of the categories are often unique, I do not think large scale nominations will work. Narrow category is a rule that seems to be flagrantly violated in a lot of places.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:00, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You might find this useful

[edit]

Hello AusLondonder. Your account has been granted the "rollbacker" and "pending changes reviewer" user rights. These user rights allow you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes and quickly revert the edits of other users.

Rollback user right
Please keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
Pending changes reviewer user right
The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection enabled is located at Special:StablePages. You may find the following pages useful to review:

Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of reviewer or rollback. If you no longer want either of these user rights, contact me and I'll remove it, alternatively you can leave a request on the administrators' noticeboard. Happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:44, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously if you don't want them or you have any questions, let me know. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:44, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that, HJ Mitchell! AusLondonder (talk) 11:59, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

[edit]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Liam Payne shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:51, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@AntiCompositeNumber: just curious why you didn't template the other editor, who used a false edit summary and removed content even after I expressed opposition? AusLondonder (talk) 22:59, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure who you're referring to. There's been a lot of edits to that page, and I haven't read them all. Your reverts of the image are covered by WP:3RRNO #7, but the 3 reverts over which source to cite and the 1 revert for style aren't. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:10, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Reverting one violation of WP:ENGVAR could hardly be considered part of an edit war. AusLondonder (talk) 00:00, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Challenge Group

[edit]

Hi, the entry was probably created by the company and most of it's edits ever since, are behalf of the company. Could you check? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A0D:6FC7:338:5E18:A78:5634:1232:5476 (talk) 12:02, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merging categories to more than one parent

[edit]

Hi, I've noticed that both on the Speedy page and in full CFD nominations, you have been nominating categories for merging to just one parent, even though they are intersections of multiple parent hierarchies.

E.g. you nominated Category:Defunct airlines of Oman for merging to Category:Defunct airlines of Asia, ignoring its other parents Category:Airlines of Oman, Category:Defunct airlines by country and Category:Defunct companies of Oman.

Although the CFD templates only allow you to specify one or two merge targets, you should manually add others into the nomination line after saving the nomination. Please do this in future when nominating categories for merging, except when for some reason only a single merge target is appropriate.

In the above case, as the article was a list rather than a single airline, I have also moved it back into Category:Defunct airlines of Asia by country. – Fayenatic London 14:03, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fayenatic london. In this case I considered a merge to the defunct airlines of Asia category was the most suitable option. By merging to Category:Defunct companies of Oman we now have another category with a single article. We may as well have kept the Category:Defunct airlines of Oman in that case as we've simply moved the problem from one category to another. Category:Defunct airlines by country is labelled as a container category which should only contain subcategories. This list is now the only article within that category. I don't see how that's helpful as the article was going to be categorised higher in the categorisation hierarchy (Category:Defunct airlines of Asia). Interested in hearing your thoughts. AusLondonder (talk) 14:35, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, as you were making a full nomination, you could have listed that parent at the same time. Leaving such parents empty, to be deleted later, means there will be no trace of the reason for deletion. It is best practice to list such parents in a nomination, so that anybody looking for those categories later can follow the links and see WHY they were deleted, and find what was in there before. – Fayenatic London 14:45, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, sorry, it wan't a full CFD. OK, I have moved the list up into Category:Defunct organizations based in Oman, and deleted the companies one under WP:G6 and recording it as "empty after Category:Defunct airlines of Oman merged to Category:Defunct airlines of Asia per Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Speedy". – Fayenatic London 14:50, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As for the container category, I have removed that template, as lists should be acceptable as well as subcats in a "by country" category. – Fayenatic London 15:05, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here's another one: you nominated Category:Agriculture in the Bahamas for speedy merger only to Category:Industry in the Bahamas, removing Agriculture and fisheries in the Bahamas from three other valid parents: Category:Agriculture by country, Category:Agriculture in the Caribbean and Category:Agriculture in North America by country. I could not work out any rationale for removing the member page from those parents, so I manually merged the article to all of them. Please add all necessary targets to such nominations in future. – Fayenatic London 16:50, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. When you use Twinkle for a speedy merge it only has one field for target category. AusLondonder (talk) 22:58, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed. Thank you for adding a second target for Category:Mining in Croatia, but in case you didn't see it, Armbrust added a third and fourth.[1] – Fayenatic London 11:55, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

fabricated

[edit]

Dear @AusLondonder https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Mykolas_Majauskas Here is made a request and have explained some basic violations. 美しい歌 (talk) 11:45, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you deleeting my article

[edit]

Why why are you deleting my article give me a reason Syed Shahzaman1 (talk) 02:30, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Syed Shahzaman1: I didn't nominate it for deletion, the discussion was started by another editor, it's at at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hill Top Educational Institute. AusLondonder (talk) 11:36, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, AusLondonder! Apropos the above, I saw this comment, and of course you're right. You seem to have the patience for prod nominations, why not make a small start on some of those pages when you've nothing better to do? Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:33, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red November 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:44, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Dolphin Mall

[edit]

I took a whack at expansing Dolphin Mall, already on my to-do list. I think I've added more than enough sources to assert notability now. What say you? Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 22:39, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TenPoundHammer: Looks good, that's a huge improvement. I'll remove the prod tag. AusLondonder (talk) 02:11, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bankstown Line

[edit]

Hello, AusLondonder,

I'm not sure why you put a tag on this empty category to rename it to Category:Sydney Trains when there is already an 11 year old category with this page title. So, this category can't be renamed to a category that already has this name. Maybe you meant to suggest a history merge or a different category name? Liz Read! Talk! 18:57, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: Hi, I was proposing a speedy merge per WP:C2F as it was a category with one eponymous page. AusLondonder (talk) 08:11, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well the tag says a speedy rename which can't happen because there is already an existing category with the proposed rename page title. Could you remove this CFD tag? It's an empty category right now and has had CSD C1 tags put on it twice already which I've removed because it has a CFD tag on the page.
Also, I came across some CFD nominations for categories about restaurants in Welsh cities but you didn't nominate Category:Restaurants in Gwynedd and it is the only remaining category in Category:Restaurants in Wales that isn't either tagged for a CFD discussion or a CSD C1 deletion. You might want to send this on its way to CFD, too. Liz Read! Talk! 07:53, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, I see you removed the speedy merge tag. Usually if a category has a single eponymous article it can be nominated at CFDS under WP:C2F, which was the case for this category as it wasn't empty when I added the nom. I'll nominate the Gwynedd category as it doesn't make sense to have a single underpopulated subcategory of the restaurants in Wales tree. AusLondonder (talk) 14:07, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, unfortunately, this empty category still has the CFD speedy rename tag on it. Could you please remove it since it won't be renamed to an existing category? Then I can tag it as a CSD C1 empty category or you can. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 06:11, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah apologies I misunderstood I thought you intended removing it. AusLondonder (talk) 08:42, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Trump and NOTFORUM

[edit]

Hello! Talk:Donald Trump is for discussing improvements to the Donald Trump article, not for more general forum-like discussions about Trump, politics, and such. I hope you will keep this in mind in any future participation there. See WP:NOTFORUM for the relevant Wikipedia policy. ―Mandruss ☎ 02:30, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mandruss: What are you talking about? AusLondonder (talk) 03:48, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What caught my eye: [2] It looked like NOTFORUM vio to me. I am not singling you out, I'm just trying to address a general NOTFORUM problem currently happening at the article; see Talk:Donald Trump#FORUM. I also failed to dig deep enough to see your 8 other comments, which were not NOTFORUM vios, and remember I don't know you. Sorry if I overstepped. ―Mandruss ☎ 04:00, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My comments were in direct response to a section titled "Can we add some positive things about his presidency to this article?" The reply you are referring to was directly in response to the original editor citing "positive" things that should be better covered within the article. It was not a discussion about Trump but directly in response to proposed edits. AusLondonder (talk) 04:17, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Member EU parliament always racist support Palestine genocide and anti refugee

[edit]

2015 European migrant crisis Why No article supporting more Refugee in Europe why try to delete article in Thailand about refugees 2001:FB1:18F:2968:2146:AFF:18F8:A113 (talk) 09:22, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. AusLondonder (talk) 12:19, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AusLondonder&oldid=1258751120"