Jump to content

Talk:Alycia Debnam-Carey

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Height

[edit]

IP editor 172.12.253.132 has constantly been chaning height from 5'5" to 5'7". Every site I have found in attempting to verify her height put it at 5'5" (though the reliability has to be questioned) with a total lack of evidence for 5'7". [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] Zarcadia (talk) 19:10, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

5'5 Allyadc (talk) 12:45, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alycia Debnam-Carey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:04, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Which lead image to use?

[edit]

As seen with this edit, I reverted an IP changing File:Alycia Debnam-Carey by Gage Skidmore.jpg to File:Alycia Debnam-Carey (28448701002) (cropped).jpg. This is because the long-standing lead image clearly show the actress's face while the second image shows the actress looking down. As seen with this edit, Vindre added File:Alycia Debnam-Carey (35337934383).jpg as the lead image a day later. I'm not sure about this image as the lead image either; it looks small in the infobox. Maybe if someone cropped it, it would look bigger. I can see that the lead image is being updated because the latter pictures are newer, but newer is not always better. If Debnam-Carey looked noticeably different than she did two or three years ago, I would understand the need for a change. But she looks the same. She has not noticeably aged, and her hairstyle/hair color is still the same. I will alert WP:TV and WP:FILM to this discussion. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 17:47, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The one from 2015. The bottle in front of her in the 2017 image is distracting. -- Radiphus 18:03, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:Alycia Debnam-Carey by Gage Skidmore.jpg is much much closer whereas File:Alycia Debnam-Carey (28448701002) (cropped).jpg File:Alycia Debnam-Carey (35337934383).jpg is further away - The "new" image could be cropped but then it would look worse iMHO, Previous image is imho obviously better. –Davey2010Talk 18:06, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I hadn't clicked the links above when writing my !vote - I went to the history instead and another image was used, Anyway with File:Alycia Debnam-Carey (28448701002) (cropped).jpg she's looking down (instead of at the camera) and although closer it seems silly to have an image of someone more or less looking at the floor when we have better images of her looking at the camera, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 19:13, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Seconded, though even File:Alycia Debnam-Carey by Gage Skidmore.jpg is a suboptimal portrait pic as she's looking off to the side rather than straight into the camera. But that's better than the second image which is not a "portrait" image and in which she's looking downwards. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 18:40, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

E!Online Awards & And MTV Fandom Awards

[edit]

Do we want to keep the e!online awards and the MTV Fandom Awards off her page? Discussion of whether or not to include these awards were also present on former co-star Eliza Taylor's talk page and the decision was made to not include them as they are highly non-notable, I assume we want to do the same here? Just asking because people keep adding said awards back after they've been removed with no argument as to why.--QueerFilmNerd (talk) 00:29, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 7 July 2020

[edit]

Alycia is not dead. Remove the dead date please. 116.89.3.141 (talk) 08:33, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. I see no death date. TheImaCow (talk) 08:55, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Early Life

[edit]

Most of this section reads more like an Educational Achievements section and is an overly detailed list of attainments whilst at school. Suggest shortening and adding some non-educational details if available. 86.25.116.40 (talk) 05:42, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@86.25.116.40 is me. Mike Lacey, UK 05:47, 21 August 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by MikeLacey (talk • contribs) [reply]
I trimmed the courses mentioned. The academic honors and achievements are given or acknowledged by the Australian government, so I believe it's notable info and insight into her early life. The arts-related info there is relevant as it depicts her journey to choosing a profession in the arts. This is a bio article after all. When I researched the actress to expand the article, I didn't find any other notable info for this section. I haven't looked into more recent articles, however. Lapadite (talk) 07:31, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Alycia_Debnam-Carey&oldid=1206910623"