User talk:F-16 Viper

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one month for attempting to out another editor and abusing multiple accounts. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

F-16 Viper (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't wish to be unblocked, the sockpuppeting is all true. Just to explain somethings though, if you look at my contributions though and you will find most of my edits were in fact sound and followed Wikipedia policy, I created multiple accounts usually because I forgot my password, and other times it was for editing different topics but I understand Wikipedias policy on suckpuppets so I wont object to the block. BTW the guy I called out Altanner1991 is in fact a frequent Wikipedia abuser who is known under investigation as Altimgamr. He frequently makes amateur hoaxes and used them as sources. Nearly all of his edits pertain to automotive related Wiki pages. I have spent a reverting these hoaxes. His name is <redacted> (he used that name himself in his accounts, so I'm not just trying to expose him) You probably wont take my word for it but you can expect him to go crazy with editing the List of Fastest Cars by Acceleration page now that I'm gone. I'm hoping some people will keep an eye on that page. <redacted>, if you see this I'm hoping you will do the right thing and stop doing biased Wiki edits with faux sources. F-16 Viper (talk) 09:23, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

1) As this is not an unblock request, I am declining it.

2) Your block was partly for outing (I have reinstated the notice you removed so you can check for yourself), yet you have continued your outing attempts in your unblock request (and I see no evidence of the user having self-identified here on Wikipedia). Because of that, I have raised your block to indefinite and have revoked your ability to edit this talk page. If you wish to appeal further, please see WP:UTRS. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:13, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

. F-16 Viper (talk) 09:23, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, F-16 Viper. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]