Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2016/07

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2016

01 July 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP users are causing havoc on the article by adding false certification and inflated sales. Protect for another week please. —IB [ Poke ] 11:51, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 20:41, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Requesting full protection. Two editors are genre warring over the lead. I created a talk section about the topic and pinged both editors but they have not replied and continue to edit war. -- ferret (talk) 11:59, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Please re-report if the edit war heats up. NeilN talk to me 15:52, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP user is making similar edits using different addresses. Protection or any other better action is requested. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:52, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 20:39, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring by two IPs. Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:04, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 20:40, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:06, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 16:10, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent IP vandalism/BLP violations . Sro23 (talk) 19:43, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 20:34, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Again people adding teams when he can't sign before July 7. Kante4 (talk) 20:14, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 20:35, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Player is involved in an ongoing match and is receiving a large amount of vandalism, mostly from IP users. Kosack (talk) 20:19, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Mattythewhite. MusikAnimal talk 20:35, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Not necessarily indefinite, but long-term protection. Very few constructive IP/non-confirmed constructive contributions. Tevlev3 (talk) 20:25, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 20:36, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP Vandalism; addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content that could be seen as defamatory to the page in question. livelikemusic talk! 12:20, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. @Livelikemusic: I would be interested to know how you think unsourced rumours of the Sugababes reforming is "vandalism" when there is a source here (though I think you are within WP:BLP policy to keep that tabloidesque gossip piece out of the article) and would recommend you look at Hanlon's razor (or my field guide). Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:22, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP edit warring and accusations of block evasion - GalatzTalk 13:28, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 2a02:c7d:bf3c:3900::/64 blocked 2 weeks NeilN talk to me 15:29, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring by multiple accounts and IPs. Looks to be possible sock or meat puppetry. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 14:05, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The issue looks to have been sufficiently dealt with, and protection probably isn't needed at this point. Feel free to decline and close this report if no further edit warring continues after Foxj's reversion. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 14:24, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Re-report if necessary or drop a note on my talk page. NeilN talk to me 15:23, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Precautionary measure since it's the day today (2016-07-01) in Canada and is mentioned on Google Doodle for Canadian users and on Wikipedia's On This Day. Ryan (talk) 14:14, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. NeilN talk to me 15:21, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: High level addition of unsourced and speculative content. – Sabbatino (talk) 08:08, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. That would be akin to cracking a nut with a sledgehammer; the semi-protection is fine for the moment. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:11, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Laber□T 12:10, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Although some edits are disruptive, the article has still got a high amount of traffic, so I think there will be enough eyes to revert anything suspicious on demand for now. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:17, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 17:24, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Kinu for 24 hours. tutterMouse (talk) 18:36, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Frequent IP vandalism over the past two to three months. Semi-protection for a month or two could help to discourage further vandalism from this person or group. This is the second request for semi-protection, the first request was granted pending-change protection instead (see here) but vandalism continued unabated. – Quoth (talk) 11:00, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. To be perfectly honest, a block is the right answer here, but the IP keeps shifting and the IP range is huge and has far too much collateral damage to get done. As a "first offence" I've gone with three days just to see if that's enough; if the vandalism carries on, give me a whistle and I'll up it to indefinite. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:14, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Ritchie333: Thanks Ritchie, but I think 3 days might be a little too short for them to get the idea – there can be a few days between vandalisms, so we'd be fortunate if we caught one of their attempts. How about we make it 2 weeks, hopefully by which time they've tried and failed enough times to give up, and if that doesn't work, then a few months or longer? – Quoth (talk) 16:02, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, having scrolled back through the history, I'll take it up to two weeks as there seems to be very little good-faith editing from IPs right now, and this trouble goes back to May and beyond. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:06, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Ref desk troll is back at it. MarnetteD|Talk 16:01, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:08, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Some people keep changing his birthdate. SLBedit (talk) 17:00, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. This article has been spent more time semi-protected than not recently, and the disruption started up immediately after the previous protection expired. I call three strikes and you're out, so I would need to see evidence that no disruption will re-occur before unprotecting. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:49, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – This player is rumoured to have signed a contract with the Montreal Canadiens, but there is no confirmation yet, semi for a bit would help. Dbrodbeck (talk) 17:03, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Two IPs have both violated WP:3RR reverting each other just this afternoon. Jeez. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:53, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 74.103.217.48 (talk) 12:36, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:49, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent removal of content and harassing by IP(s). Also harassed Simione001 personally on his talk page. --SuperJew (talk) 13:08, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That link there is only the tip of the iceberg, [1], [2]. Simione001 (talk) 13:20, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Blocking won't help, as s/he uses a range of IP's. --SuperJew (talk) 15:32, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:55, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Ever since his speech at the BET Awards, the subject's page has been consistently, several times a day, defaced with often pretty vile racist vandalism. It's like every white supremacist who's never been on Wikipedia before has decided to jump in. --Tenebrae (talk) 15:32, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 1 month. NeilN talk to me 15:35, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. nableezy - 03:40, 1 July 2016 (UTC) 03:40, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected Nakon 05:17, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3. nableezy - 03:43, 1 July 2016 (UTC) 03:43, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected Nakon 05:19, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.--Bozalegenda (talk) 13:51, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:25, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Ongoing unsourced additions. Snuggums (talk / edits) 21:49, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 05:09, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I beg to differ, Nakon; pretty much all IP edits since April have been unconfirmed (and likely fanmade) additions. Leaving it unprotected now is basically asking for trouble. Snuggums (talk / edits) 07:23, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This has had some vandalism from IPs for a while now. Someone (or perhaps multiple people) under different IPs keeps adding the name "My Vagina" as a fake album name under the "Discography" section. This has been going on since May. Kokoro20 (talk) 04:50, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 05:22, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Seems a bit pointless to leave this page unprotected whilst the corresponding user is Oversight blocked indefinitely. Mike1901 (talk) 07:47, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seems a bit pointless to protect unless someone's going to do some gravedancing which feels unlikely. The talkpage is protected by request of the user though so under that reasoning a full protection for the userpage could be helpful. tutterMouse (talk) 09:30, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Have to disagree there TutterMouse, I've already reverted one IP edit to it today, and others have reverted three other peices recently - it might be worth protecting for a week or so until interest dies down? -- samtar talk or stalk 09:44, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected If autoconfirmed users start to gravedance/vandalise....we shall probably resort to blocks instead of full protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:47, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Anon IP is now edit warring to return article wording to non-consensus version, even after consensus seeking started via discussion on article talk page - in which IP has not taken part. Personal attack now added by IP into latest edit summary ("The Kennedy's would have lobotomized you") which shows disruption only intended. If protection added, request article be returned to improved version that was established prior to last disruptive reversion by IP. -- WV 17:35, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Pot, meet kettle. Your both black. 107.77.192.118 (talk) 18:04, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As I'm sure you already know, you don't get to decide "not done" as you are not an administrator. But, your continuation of the disruption here (along with hounding my edits) is noted. -- WV 18:13, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭 107.77.194.204 (talk) 18:16, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Nakon 05:05, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There seems to be an edit war between IPs from various areas in the Middle East over the origins of nougat, including things like the names of places. Scjessey (talk) 19:23, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 05:06, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Daniel.Cardenas (talk) 22:01, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Nakon 05:09, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. --Kansas Bear (talk) 23:20, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Nakon 05:11, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP-anonymous editors, by way of adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. livelikemusic talk! 00:53, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 05:12, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Heavy traffic on this page after a reported signing; lot of angry NBA fans showing up here to vent. Altamel (talk) 06:17, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:24, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of anon users or random users keep adding new players or sponsors with no verification from the teams. ArsenalFan700 (talk) 06:53, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:23, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP-hopping vandal persistently changing article text, inconsistent with source; attacks resumed following expiration of prior semi-protection. JohnInDC (talk) 16:27, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 05:04, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Article seems to attract a slow but steady stream of IP-based POV pushing. VQuakr (talk) 19:16, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 20:37, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pizza and nachos

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. I gather from others' edit summaries and the commentary by blocked user User talk:184.167.6.58 that 4chan's project this week involves encouraging folks to edit-war into these articles the notions that "'go 'za", "'ork 'za", and "'chos" are ubiquitous slang terms for Chicago-style pizza, New York-style pizza, and nachos, respectively. Chicago-style pizza was protected for a couple of days and the misconduct resumed within minutes of the page protection's expiration, so it may take at least a week before the novelty wears off. Julietdeltalima (talk) 19:45, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected one week for Nachos, Chicago-style pizza, New York-style pizza, and Pizza in the United States. Holding off on St. Louis-style pizza for now. It should be protected if disruption increases to the level of the other four articles. Katietalk 20:35, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Speculation and unsourced edits. Qed237 (talk) 21:28, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 05:07, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of African dishes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 05:08, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. GABgab 21:41, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 05:09, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: High level of IP disruption, lengthy log, pending not working. '''tAD''' (talk) 22:09, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 05:10, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Pesistent vandalism and BLP violations. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 00:45, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 05:11, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, most recently by IPs, almost certainly part of Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/DPeterson. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 02:32, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 05:13, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: relentless stalking of page by obsessed IPs (latest one shown here). Quis separabit? 03:16, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 05:14, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IPs. This involves a political race where vandals are changing the party of the political figure. 73.43.44.4 (talk) 03:38, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 05:14, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction in protection level: From full protection to template editor protection. Zyxw (talk) 23:48, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected Nakon 05:01, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction in protection level: From full protection to template editor protection. Zyxw (talk) 01:31, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected Nakon 05:02, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. clpo13(talk) 16:37, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 21:23, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: due to recurrent vandalism and censorship (especially by Jemorrismemphis), who has been warned already (see [4]). Quis separabit? 17:55, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Please re-report if the problem continues. BethNaught (talk) 19:36, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Long-term disruptive (173.67.x.x) IP-hopper adding unsourced content, non-reliable sources, and disruptive edits and edit summaries. He has been repeatedly blocked and re-blocked by Admins. Xenophrenic (talk) 22:25, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 23:26, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sudden high level of IP and new user vandalism. Sro23 (talk) 23:29, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 23:32, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

02 July 2016

Semi-protection: This page is under pending changes protection. However, persistent disruptive editing from non-confirmed users and IPs are still happening. Please increase to semi-protection. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 22:45, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The PC protection will remain in place after the semiprotection expires. MelanieN (talk) 21:42, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ongoing fancruft. Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:55, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:44, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Disruption from User:JovanAndreano ip's and sockpuppets started as soon as previous protection expired. Sro23 (talk) 05:13, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:49, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. clpo13(talk) 21:22, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:39, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism resumed after previous protection expired. —cyberpowerChat:Limited Access 16:42, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 16:45, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Your declining my request for protection in my own user space and after every single run page for my bots was attacked by a vandal only account?—cyberpowerChat:Limited Access 16:48, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
And I just got vandalized again. It would seem my bots and I are getting attacked left and right right now.—cyberpowerChat:Limited Access 16:50, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
IP blocked. If further attacks happen, let me know. Widr (talk) 16:53, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. General Ization Talk 16:37, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done @General Ization: Already an indef semi NeilN talk to me 17:21, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite creation protection: Repeatedly created. Anarchyte (work | talk) 04:54, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Three creates is the standard rule of thumb NeilN talk to me 15:47, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: People are claiming that he has moved to Manchester United, but no medical examination has been performed and no contract has been signed. Borussia Dortmund have released a statement saying they have agreed to sell him to United, but that's all so far. No contract, no transfer. – PeeJay 12:28, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Full protection not justified. No different from the seemingly hundreds of players subject to transfer rumors. NeilN talk to me 15:27, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Glitchygirl (talk) 14:39, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 15:32, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Multiple IPs attacking this BLP. Meters (talk) 19:39, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Gogo Dodo. NeilN talk to me 19:42, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 16:47, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 18:47, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by multiple IPs before and after the article's complete re-write in June. Jackdude101 (Talk) 17:26, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 18:45, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. GABgab 18:17, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 18:43, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Telstra -vandal IP (see User:Huldra/Telstra-socks) abuse, Huldra (talk) 17:04, 2 July 2016 (UTC). Huldra (talk) 17:04, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:13, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Telstra -vandal IP (see User:Huldra/Telstra-socks) abuse, Huldra (talk) 17:06, 2 July 2016 (UTC). Huldra (talk) 17:06, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:10, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Telstra -vandal IP (see User:Huldra/Telstra-socks) abuse, Huldra (talk) 17:07, 2 July 2016 (UTC). Huldra (talk) 17:07, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:16, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism – Telstra -vandal IP (see User:Huldra/Telstra-socks) abuse, Huldra (talk) 17:14, 2 July 2016 (UTC). Huldra (talk) 17:14, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:15, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by dynamic ip user who continually makes variations of edits inserting the name, Sunit Patel. Perhaps it is a person that the user wants to defame. Morbidthoughts (talk) 23:34, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A note that the vandalism has been since May. Morbidthoughts (talk) 06:08, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:55, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Telstra -vandal IP (see User:Huldra/Telstra-socks) abuse, Huldra (talk) 16:52, 2 July 2016 (UTC) . Huldra (talk) 16:52, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:57, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Telstra -vandal IP (see User:Huldra/Telstra-socks) abuse, Huldra (talk) 16:53, 2 July 2016 (UTC) . Huldra (talk) 16:53, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:58, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Telstra -vandal IP (see User:Huldra/Telstra-socks) abuse, Huldra (talk) 16:53, 2 July 2016 (UTC) . Huldra (talk) 16:53, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:56, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Telstra -vandal IP (see User:Huldra/Telstra-socks) abuse, Huldra (talk) 17:00, 2 July 2016 (UTC). Huldra (talk) 17:00, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Widr. NeilN talk to me 17:04, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from numerous IPs over an extended period of time. ERK talk 17:00, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:03, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, many from IP addresses. The current edit says he was found dead on a tour bus (nothing in the media so its obviously a hoax). Too many crazed fans maybe but I think a temp semi-protect would be in order since this has gone on for several days from the edit history. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:50, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:52, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandals repeatedly adding hoax players and other vandalism. Amccann421 (talk) 06:44, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Pending changes seems to be working as intended. Katietalk 11:51, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Good faith edits made to this article made it significiantly better However they are being reverted to a version that was too lengthy and contained wrong info . Varun  07:41, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Not only doesn't this rise to the level for full protection, it's under discussion at ANI. No forum shopping. Katietalk 11:49, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther :  Talk  12:17, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:38, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Page being targeted by potential IP sock of indeffed user Superkeegan9100. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 14:04, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:46, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Immediate return to vandalism after most recent long-term semi-protection period. Tevlev3 (talk) 05:36, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 12:13, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation-protection: User:Sajithmahadev, now socking with IP User:116.68.115.81 repeatedly recreate the same promotional (and in any case, so badly written article as to be nonsensical), even duplicating the article in both upper- and lower-case headings- one of which has been deleted, and the current one CSD'd under G11. Muffled Pocketed 11:52, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 15:24, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Still a target for the loving lads. A six month PC was tried, but did not bring down the work load. Moving to a temp semi would be SOP, but if you look at the editing history, the DAB has been stable for years, and there has never been a single purposeful addition by unregged or non-confirmed editors. Which isn't that strange - it's a DAB. . Sam Sailor Talk! 14:20, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 15:35, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of continuous IP vandalism, now veiled as "talk page discussion" prior to simply deleting or rewriting cited summaries... from User:Alexis Ivanov. I've asked this editor to not arbitrarily delete content, but instead to search for citations that support what may be currently unsourced. I performed source finding today and added citations to several unsourced portions, and the editor simply went on to further contest already the newly cited material (ignoring their previous contentious issue). I am requesting page protection because having to revert an article almost daily is discouraging, and then having to walk someone through their misunderstandings and so on, is quite tasking and makes one think twice about performing good faith effort in developing poorly written / cited articles. HafizHanif (talk) 23:33, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why you are lying, and hiding behind the veil of other people rescuing you. I didn't deleted any content because it was unsourced, I edited the content to a better wording after you have failed to read the page 90, not only that you are continuing to disagree with the same source you are using and injected your own conclusion. Alexis Ivanov (talk) 23:46, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Katietalk 07:32, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Talk page being used for spam, rather than unblock request . OnionRing (talk) 07:08, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. BethNaught (talk) 07:11, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – One editor is adding peculiar numbers to the article, using a variety of IP addresses. An administrator at WP:ANI suggested page protection to discourage this editor. Scjessey (talk) 11:39, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 11:48, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Procedural removal of protection needed: fewer than 150 transclusions. Eyesnore 19:04, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Katietalk 11:45, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction in protection level: From full protection to template editor protection. Zyxw (talk) 05:05, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Katietalk 11:47, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – transfer rumours. Qed237 (talk) 15:28, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:47, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of IP vandalism . JMHamo (talk) 21:01, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:55, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent edit warring by multiple IPs Jim1138 (talk) 07:44, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 09:22, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit history is just full of petty vandalism and reversions thereof. BurritoBazooka (talk) 21:43, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 07:22, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —MRD2014 T C 23:41, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 02:09, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection:for a month. High level of IP vandalism. Wetrace (talk) 01:57, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Note that this article falls under WP:AFLG. Katietalk 07:27, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent trolling by an IP-hopping LTA, long-term disruptive editing from others. Here is one of many, many examples. GABgab 03:08, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I think semi is better here. Katietalk 07:31, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated addition of non-existent article to dab. ⁓ Hello71 03:25, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 07:28, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Calidum ¤ 05:32, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. by KrakatoaKatie. BethNaught (talk) 07:14, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thought about this for a bit - erring on the side of caution. Katietalk 07:21, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent vandalism seems to be tied to a silly drive to change the name to "spicy boys": http://www.dailydot.com/unclick/fire-ants-petition-spicy-boys/. Sjö (talk) 06:23, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 07:13, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of IP vandalism . JMHamo (talk) 21:03, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 22:22, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism/sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Никита-Родин-2002 and its archive. Long-term abuse inserting false information about charts/certifications related to The Who. ~ RobTalk 21:54, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 22:19, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 22:06, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Widr (talk) 22:17, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

03 July 2016

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Many edits attempting to post personal views on the Derry/Londonderry name dispute. 331dot (talk) 15:41, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. -- zzuuzz (talk) 20:20, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Twice recently good faith IPs have added an article to this template, causing it to be added to potentially vast numbers of pages. Please semiprotect indefinitely. PamD 16:54, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected -- zzuuzz (talk) 19:56, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated addition of offensive BLP-material. Several revdels. 3 previous short-time protections. GermanJoe (talk) 19:39, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. It's possible short-term semi-protections may be necessary in the future, to augment this, but the long-term disruption and BLP violations make indefinite pending changes warranted and necessary. Katietalk 20:11, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Genre warring since protection was removed . Swimsnunki (talk) 05:05, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:05, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP and new user vandalism. Jujutsuan (Please notify with {{re}} talk | contribs) 17:58, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:03, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism from IP users, including blanking entire page. MurielMary (talk) 18:47, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. I cant't see any justification for full protection, but will leave this request here in case anyone else sees something I'm missing. ‑ Iridescent 18:53, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —Farix (t | c) 02:13, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:23, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. LG-Gunther :  Talk  09:12, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 17:19, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Own userspace. Mlpearc (open channel) 14:06, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 14:21, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —Farix (t | c) 02:13, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:23, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. LG-Gunther :  Talk  09:12, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 17:19, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Own userspace. Mlpearc (open channel) 14:06, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 14:21, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —Farix (t | c) 02:13, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:23, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. LG-Gunther :  Talk  09:12, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 17:19, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Own userspace. Mlpearc (open channel) 14:06, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 14:21, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, Persistent Vandalism Oceanic Wave (talk) 23:14, 2 July 2016 (UTC) This article regularly gets vandalized, the subject is a a pop star that is gaining a lot of popularity, he used to be part of a boy band, and he left. That made the boyband fans angry and there is a fanwar between the fans of the subject and the boyband fans, the article is being used to fanwar. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Huang_Zitao&diff=728049131&oldid=728048895 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Huang_Zitao&diff=728049509&oldid=728049400 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Huang_Zitao&diff=728000884&oldid=727923029 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Huang_Zitao&diff=728049400&oldid=728049131 Oceanic Wave (talk) 23:14, 2 July 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Editing to add that since I sent the request more IP vandalism happened more fanwar. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Huang_Zitao&diff=728095304&oldid=728074488 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Huang_Zitao&diff=728099769&oldid=728095542 Oceanic Wave (talk) 06:00, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:51, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 00:01, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:39, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: IPs keep adding their own names and other random stuff to the article. 117.221.124.156 (talk) 13:48, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:02, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant unsourced additions.  AxG /  / 10 years of editing 19:34, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:35, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article has been protected before in the past so many times, due to numerous IPs adding in unsourced info about the channel's return, this has been going on for years now, and it keeps happening.  AxG /  / 10 years of editing 19:37, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:37, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Template protection: Highly visible template, and also subjected to very heavy vandalism, that was very apparent on articles transcluding this template.—cyberpowerChat:Offline 06:45, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Closedmouth. Katietalk 09:27, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Page-move vandalism from BuickCenturyDriver

Indefinite move protection: These pages were semi-protected above, but the sockmaster activated a sleeper and engaged in page move vandalism. There will be no legitimate reason to ever move these pages. ~ Rob13Talk 07:32, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 07:42, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See article/page editing history. Tevlev3 (talk) 03:41, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 07:12, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See article/page editing history. Tevlev3 (talk) 03:42, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 07:13, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See article/page editing history. Tevlev3 (talk) 03:42, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 07:14, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism immediately after recent release from the previous protection period. Tevlev3 (talk) 01:33, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 03:38, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Hoax page repeatedly recreated. Amccann421 (talk) 03:15, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 03:41, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – lots of vandalism over the last few weeks . Joeykai (talk) 03:32, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 07:11, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Persistant IP vandalism on Phyicis based articles

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Adam in MO Talk 04:00, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Shirt58. Materialscientist (talk) 07:10, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent IPs putting "Islamist Muslim Terrorist". Likely meatpuppetry brought on by the Breitbart coverage. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 04:25, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with this request, semi is necessary here with the amount of vandalism going on. Omni Flames (talk) 06:50, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 07:07, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Edit-warring dynamic IP, probable sock, adding tags to the article without justification on the talkpage. Dr. K. 06:19, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seconding request. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 06:30, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 07:05, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruption from IP hopping edit warrior resumed once previous protection expired. Sro23 (talk) 06:29, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

no Declined not protection been editing. 188.32.100.23 (talk) 06:30, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
IPs cannot decline page protection requests. Especially IP hopping sockpuppet vandals. --Ebyabe talk - Health and Welfare06:52, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A. 188.32.100.23 (talk) 06:54, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done Materialscientist (talk) 07:04, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Userpages of confirmed socks which are being repeatedly changed by the sockmaster. These can be safely semi-protected indefinitely, since there should never be any need to edit these pages. ~ Rob13Talk 06:38, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 07:04, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Userpages of confirmed socks which are being repeatedly changed by the sockmaster. These can be safely semi-protected indefinitely, since there should never be any need to edit these pages. ~ Rob13Talk 06:38, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 07:04, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Userpages of confirmed socks which are being repeatedly changed by the sockmaster. These can be safely semi-protected indefinitely, since there should never be any need to edit these pages. ~ Rob13Talk 06:38, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 07:04, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatedly created by socks of BuickCenturyDriver (talk · contribs). . clpo13(talk) 23:07, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. MelanieN (talk) 00:21, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry by BuickCenturyDriver (talk · contribs). clpo13(talk) 23:09, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Bbb23. - both pages. MelanieN (talk) 00:15, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Currently being repeatedly edited by socks of BuickCenturyDriver. ~ Rob13Talk 23:17, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:18, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – edit war. The Banner talk 23:41, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 23:44, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Both pending changes and semi protection is enabled on this page. I'm requesting that either pending changes be removed or semi protection be removed because there's no point in having both activated on the article. I'd be happy with removing semi protection and see how the article goes with only PPC. also, protecting admin seems to be inactive. st170etalk 13:21, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The high editing rate suggests semi-prot should be in place only, PC wouldn't be suitable right now. tutterMouse (talk) 13:59, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined st170e, a short semi-protect and a longer PC-protect is a technique I sometimes use myself. NeilN talk to me 17:18, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@NeilN: This isn't a short term semi-protect, it's been protected indefinitely since October 2015. PC is also indefinite. There really isn't a need for both indefinitely, I can see why you would use the technique you've described but that isn't the case here. st170etalk 20:04, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

04 July 2016

My talk page was vandalised See here by troll from He:wiki. Its happened also in Commons and German Wikipedia. The text is in Hebrew and it says that I am shit and a whore. This is User:יעל י That was blocked globally on Meta see here for abusing users on Hebrew wiki and Commons. She has a lot of Sockpuppets some of them were record in commons in Category:Sockpuppets of יעל י. My talk page was protected because of her before, see here. I am asking now for indefinite protection, because she will reture in the future and it will happen again. I am an Administrator in Hebrew Wikipedia an OTRS volunteer and an active user in commons. and Meta-wiki. And it will happen again. Thanks. Hanay (talk) 14:55, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Hanay, I sympathize and revdelled the edits but we cannot protect, let alone indefinitely protect, because of one edit in six months. NeilN talk to me 15:12, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@NeilN: This is amazing, I told you what she is doing, and you think that this is not enough. I saw that you hide what she wrote, thank you for that. We wiil see how soon she wiil return. Hanay (talk) 15:19, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hanay, and if the disruption continues in the near future, your talk page can be semi-protected for a short period of time, but not indefinitely. Other admins, please keep an eye on Hanay's talk page. --NeilN talk to me 15:24, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@NeilN: I found now another edit of her see here. The meaning of the user name she used in Hebrew is: "Hanay is a troll and she came to destroy wikipedia", Please block this user name. Thanks Hanay (talk) 15:42, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Blocked. --NeilN talk to me 15:52, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@NeilN: But now you create a page User talk:אני.הטרולית.חנה.יריב.את.התרבות.אני.אחריב that can be found by searching. That what she want. I would appreciate if you delete it. Thanks. Hanay (talk) 16:29, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hanay, I know it's unpleasant but you'll have to learn to ignore it. Every day we get user name variations of "x is a [insult]". We block, add a notice, and move on. --NeilN talk to me 16:34, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@NeilN:I am sorry to read your answer. In commons they agreed to delete the talk page. For you it is easy to say to me "move on". What you are doing is to feed the troll. I made a mistake to tell you about this user name. I Hebrew wikipedia we are more assertive in fighting trolls, we do not say to user "move on" we do care about the feelings of the users. Do you have at least here a template "not for search" We have it in Hebrew wikipedia. If you do, can you at least add it to the talk page? Thanks Hanay (talk) 16:46, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hanay, each WMF wiki has its own policies and guidelines. And I think every active admin on the English Wikipedia including myself has had a similar situation happen to them. I believe talk pages on the English Wikipedia are not indexed as a default but I've added the NOINDEX keyword just in case. If you have further concerns, please post to my or any other admin's talk page. --NeilN talk to me 16:55, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
motivo
  • Por favor proteger de manera indefinida su UserPage a nivel sysop y que no lo pueda editar el usuario porque reiteradamente vuelve a poner datos personales inadecuados. ya fue Advertido pero hizo caso omiso aquí y en la wikipedia en español. Allá esta su PU protegida y solicito que lo esté acá. ver la denuncia en la wikipedia en español: Usuario insistente. Disculpas por no hablar inglés pero no lo hablo y no quiero usar el google translate. Saludos. -- Elreysintrono (Su majestad) 15:51, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Semi-protecting the user page will do nothing as the user is auto-confirmed NeilN talk to me 15:57, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello User:NeilN Yo me refería a nivel Sysop o Admin. O me equivoqué de sección y era abajo? si es así lo siento pero no me fijé bien cuando puse la denuncia. Pero reitero mi solicitud. -- Elreysintrono (Su majestad) 16:00, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Elreysintrono. In this case, if the editor has inappropriate content on their user page, we would warn them, and if the inappropriate additions continued, block them. Basically, if it's one problematic editor, a block is preferable than a protect, no matter what page it is. --NeilN talk to me 16:05, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Eso prefiero dejarlo a su criterio y en el aviso que le dejé le avisé de un bloqueo pero hizo caso omiso, pero también ando un poco confundido que no encuentro una sección adecuada. Ando perdido, lo siento. -- Elreysintrono (Su majestad) 16:16, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent & disruptive editing. MuyXmuy (talk) 19:03, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 20:09, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent & disruptive vandalism. MuyXmuy (talk) 19:05, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 20:05, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent & disruptive vandalism. MuyXmuy (talk) 19:06, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 20:03, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from an anonymous, IP-hopping vandal who is hellbent on inserting original research nonsense about soul-eating and "divine cannibalism" (sic) into this and other mythology articles. Vandal has already used over 3, maybe 4 different IPs in the last 24 to 48 hours alone attacking just this page.--Mr Fink (talk) 19:39, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 20:01, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent edit warring on order of houses in the 'Houses' section. Fmveatel (talk) 12:00, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 15:25, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Player involved in recent transaction. Many unproductive edits. TM 17:43, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:40, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated IP anon vandalism. Dual Freq (talk) 18:49, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:59, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism, likely block evasion. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 09:55, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with this request. There's only been a total of two different vandals on this page in the last four or five months. I don't think that's enough for semi-protection to be warranted here. Omni Flames (talk) 09:57, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:25, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:54, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:00, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Looks like a LTA has taken a shine to it, could an admin oblige?. -- samtar talk or stalk 17:21, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 17:25, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page was previously semi-protected due to disruptive editing; it appears there has been a few cases of vandalism since the protection ended. Requesting semi-protection again. Dane2007 (talk) 01:02, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:18, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Everymorning (talk) 14:20, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:16, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by block evasion. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 14:39, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Widr. NeilN talk to me 15:13, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 11:03, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 11:35, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Need protection on my subpage which has my to-do list, just to avoid further disruptions. — TOG 13:28, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 13:33, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – This page continues to be repeatedly recreated by socks. ~ Rob13Talk 14:14, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 14:16, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 23:56, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, insistent genre warring. Wilson, Christopher D (talk) 08:14, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:04, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Long-time problematic IP editor (previously editing as 45.26.44.116 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) has resumed an old edit war to change citations en masse. Toohool (talk) 18:16, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. - @Toohool: Used a range block to stop the disruption, please notify us if this fails to address the issue. Coffee // have a cup // beans // 07:31, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – On-going move war. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:55, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection is definitely necessary here. I second this request. Omni Flames (talk) 09:58, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Move protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 11:32, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion. Socks of 71.246.156.3 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) vandalise page. BLP violations. Dr. K. 11:14, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Widr. NeilN talk to me 11:27, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP editor is repeatedly removing the TFD notice and adding mismatched brackets. 98.230.192.179 (talk) 00:14, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 09:08, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism as Edited by User:Bertrand101 Sock. LG-Gunther :  Talk  00:20, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 09:06, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Since June 28, 2016, there has been ongoing vandalism by editors 69.63.83.102, 108.195.128.57, and 155.229.209.58, who have been repeatedly adding the same unsource text. Paul H. (talk) 03:07, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Ian.thomson. Katietalk 09:02, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please add pending changes protection for an indefinite period of time, until stability reigns over this article. During a recent patrol, I was drawn to notice the unreasonable amount of IP trolling the article has endured for a considerable while. The cumulative effect has sadly disheveled this important Wikipedia article and the bad guys do just enough damage to avoid being blocked. The good guys will benefit from the handicap as they restore this article's credibility. When it is again: encyclopedic, its integrity ought to be maintained. Consider, for example: the copyvio introduced over 1 year ago by a single purposed account; it persists in the article to this very day. I'll be giving my attention to fixing the article as soon as I can. Please protect it from further harm with PC, as a prudent next step. Thank you.--John Cline (talk) 06:45, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I don't like those edit summaries, which are the same kind as when Favonian locked it for three months for sockpuppetry. Katietalk 09:00, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A lot of IP's have been attacking regular editors who edit the page on this talk page. This Needs protection for a temporary time to prevent further personal attacks by IP's. Class455fan1 (talk) 21:21, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - Due to the severe violations, we've protected this talk page and oversighted the extreme attacks. Coffee // have a cup // beans // 08:17, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP addresses are vandalizing the article. JC · Talk · Contributions 22:05, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Coffee // have a cup // beans // 08:20, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 23:14, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Coffee // have a cup // beans // 08:21, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Persistent disruptive editing. Donnowin1 (talk) 20:16, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Coffee // have a cup // beans // 07:34, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Continual vandalism from users pertaining to a Youtube channel "Filthy Frank" who apparently reference the film repeatedly. Stereorock (talk) 20:32, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Coffee // have a cup // beans // 07:59, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent re-creation of hoaxes by several different IP ranges. Tevlev3 (talk) 20:35, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - Regardless of this user's socking, this request was accurate. Coffee // have a cup // beans // 08:00, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel_articles_3#General_Prohibition. nableezy - 06:43, 4 July 2016 (UTC) 06:43, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Coffee // have a cup // beans // 07:54, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel_articles_3#General_Prohibition. nableezy - 06:43, 4 July 2016 (UTC) 06:43, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Coffee // have a cup // beans // 07:54, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel_articles_3#General_Prohibition. nableezy - 06:44, 4 July 2016 (UTC) 06:44, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Coffee // have a cup // beans // 07:54, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: edit-warring. Some users just want to have their hand and are not interested in waiting until the talk page discussion has been concluded.Ymblanter (talk) 12:49, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Coffee // have a cup // beans // 07:22, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 15:14, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Coffee // have a cup // beans // 07:24, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and addition of unsourced content. A day protection should be sufficient. Thanks. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 16:25, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Coffee // have a cup // beans // 07:25, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of vandalism . JMHamo (talk) 10:48, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:06, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Controversial politician recently elected. Moderate level of IP vandalism. Pete (talk) 11:14, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:08, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Potential WP:COI editing, also WP:OWN as he announced on this tweet that an upload of an image of him is coming. Additionally, this has been raised with WP:COIN. Donnie Park (talk) 23:43, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. NeilN talk to me 02:40, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Even after the page was protected in the last attempt, as seen in this revision, anonymous users keep on altering the page, even though the series was only one season. Yoshiman6464 (talk) 04:44, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:02, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – 1. Persistent disruptive change of team, although no transfer has taken place. 2. Persistent removal of "reported transaction" message even though it has been reported but not confirmed. Amccann421 (talk) 06:32, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:04, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – slow, long term, vandalism by an IP. Huldra (talk) 10:57, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mifter (talk) 01:13, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection: high number of moves being made against established consensus, possibly also in violation of WP:NPOV. Ebonelm (talk) 02:53, 4 July 2016 (UTC

Move protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 05:38, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I'm going to try this again, a lot of time is being spent just fixing IP vandal edits. Mlpearc (open channel) 03:40, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 03:56, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – OneLittleMouse is an admin on the Russian wiki but their English userpage is constantly being vandalized by self admitted IPsocks of User:Никита-Родин-2002. . Sro23 (talk) 05:23, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 05:34, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism after recent release from previous protection period. I'm a bit on the edge with this one since it's a highly visible userpage... Tevlev3 (talk) 20:35, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Since shorter protections have been ineffective in the past I have chosen a larger duration. HighInBC Need help? {{ping|HighInBC}} 20:46, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
After a review of the last two months of disruptions I have decided that reducing to semi-protection is enough. HighInBC Need help? {{ping|HighInBC}} 20:51, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... NeilN talk to me 02:38, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of promotional and unsourced content and non notable employees by multiple accounts; looks a lot like socking and COI involvement. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 01:21, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is COI involved. See my talk page. — JJMC89(T·C) 02:00, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected – Two months. Possible hoax. There was an ancient company with that name, from the 1600s, but it's unlikely there is a refounded modern company of the same name with 573,000 employees. EdJohnston (talk) 03:15, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This is not a hoax as the company is purcheased by Mr. Thomas. If you people want we can submit the company regsitration certificate as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Petersmithfrance (talkcontribs) 03:28, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Random86 (talk) 01:39, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — ξxplicit 01:55, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Ongoing disruption by multiple IPs and new users. Laber□T 14:59, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Almost all edits are by registered users. Discussion is ongoing and while a couple of editors are right up against 3RR, none have stepped over it yet. Katietalk 20:30, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Sro23 (talk) 15:44, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 22:52, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term semi-protection: In March, an anonymous editor abused several IP addresses to add a poorly sourced, one-off nickname to the page. The IPs were blocked and it appears they had given up. The editor has now returned (IP 96.254.101.16) and re-added the nickname twice in the past day. Long-term semi-protection would help to end this user's edit-warring. Trut-h-urts man (TC) 20:54, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please also see the edit warring noticeboard report I have filed. Trut-h-urts man (TC) 22:11, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The editor has yet again jumped into a different IP address ([5]), further proving the need for long-term page protection. Trut-h-urts man (TC) 23:14, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already done by administrator EdJohnston. for a period of two months. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (Complaints|Mistakes) 00:26, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism within 30 minutes of a one-year PP expiration. May also want to consider revision-delete one or more of the recent edits. ☾Loriendrew☽ (ring-ring) 23:07, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. --Bongwarrior (talk) 23:15, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: many unsourced edits, would be nice to protect it at least until the game's out. DM Trix (talk) 16:53, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 20:35, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. — Andy W. (talk ·ctb) 17:46, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked., all three users.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:01, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Referee in European Championship refereeing a current match. He is attracting some angry fans. Qed237 (talk) 20:50, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:02, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

05 July 2016

Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations. Wikiuser13 (talk | contribs) 13:15, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 15:23, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article continues to receive disruptive editing from IPs who are removing, altering, or adding content that violates WP:NPOV. . – jona 13:30, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 20:46, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: In own userspace. Mlpearc (open channel) 21:07, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done kelapstick(bainuu) 21:09, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: In own userspace. Mlpearc (open channel) 21:08, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done kelapstick(bainuu) 21:11, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: In own userspace. Mlpearc (open channel) 21:09, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done kelapstick(bainuu) 21:12, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – Persistent vandalism. Varun  12:26, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question: @VarunFEB2003: How do you figure this falls under arb enforcement? NeilN talk to me 12:28, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
i didnt figure i just thought that would be best as full wouldnt be good as it would for short time --Varun  12:30, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined @VarunFEB2003: Please don't make requests that are against policy. NeilN talk to me 12:39, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ok --Varun  12:43, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. nableezy - 16:38, 5 July 2016 (UTC) 16:38, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done NeilN talk to me 16:41, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. There's been a large amount of IP vandalism since yesterday. clpo13(talk) 17:17, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 6 months. NeilN talk to me 17:54, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Heavy Google Doodle/current event related vandalism. Safiel (talk) 17:31, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:51, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection:. High level of IP vandalism from fans of the Cleveland Indians, one of this team's divisional rivals. TomCat4680 (talk) 05:34, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 15:27, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Looks like we edit conflicted, [:User:KrakatoaKatie|Katie]]. Do you want me to roll back? NeilN talk to me 15:29, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Also likely sockpuppet activity. See edits at Ginnifer Goodwin. Ebyabe talk - Repel All Boarders07:36, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 2605:E000:7D0A:900::/64 blocked one week. Katietalk 12:02, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page faces persistent vandalism from small-scale phone companies that want to advertise themselves in Wikipedia. As vandalism on this page is already spiraling out of control (at least 1 every day, with constant edit wars between WP editors and vandals), I hereby request permanent semi-protection for this page (this page has been protected in the past, but temporary protection has not stopped the vandalism). . Tseung Kwan O (talk) 09:27, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The page is at AFD; unless there's serious disruption. it's not a good idea to protect pages undergoing deletion discussions. Katietalk 12:07, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 15:31, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:36, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. nableezy - 20:34, 4 July 2016 (UTC) 20:34, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

{{RFPP|nea}} CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:02, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:57, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Presumably a single person (multiple ips though) keeps adding a column containing some non free images even though it fails the criteria. They refuse to discuss and there is rough consensus between the rest of us that the entire column should be removed. See details at Talk:List_of_political_parties_in_India#Bharatiya_Janata_Party_flag. . Ugog Nizdast (talk) 13:51, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 15:20, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated disruptive editing. TM 14:12, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 15:17, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP users are blanking sections of this article. Please provide temporary semi-protection. Dane2007 (talk) 06:00, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 12:18, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion by User:Harry (singer). Binksternet (talk) 06:09, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 2A02:C7D:9EC5:3800::/64 also blocked 45 days – he's had that IP for a while. Katietalk 12:12, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Player is being reportedly signed by Manchester United but there has been no official announcement. IP addresses have been changing his team. GoPurple'nGold24 06:39, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 12:13, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Additions of synth to BLP article by multiple IPs and new autoconfirmed. BLP issues. Jim1138 (talk) 09:22, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 12:04, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: - per IP vandalism as results are revealed.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:26, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Looks busy but managed. NeilN talk to me 03:26, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (tJosve05a (c) 02:57, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 03:31, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Djhitesh (talk) 05:05, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined No current level of vandalism. Djhitesh, please read our protection policy NeilN talk to me 05:11, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism activity on this stable article , User:DjHitesh (talk)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 03:24, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Majora (talk) 04:37, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 05:14, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sock puppetry vandalism. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:41, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator MusikAnimal. NeilN talk to me 05:12, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism activity on this usually stable article in last 24 hours, all by ips and new accounts. BusterD (talk) 01:04, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:59, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by an OWN ip editor. AN3 currently filed but taking a while to resolve for some reason. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 03:34, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 03:50, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP address editors are vandalizing the template. JC · Talk · Contributions 04:33, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:09, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pages transcluding {{Persondata}}

Please delete {{Persondata}} from this articles. The template is deprecated and its deletion is discussed Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 June 26‎#Template:Persondata -- T.seppelt (talk) 18:52, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

All of these have been Done by other admins already. — xaosflux Talk 03:52, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – For some reason, there has been a slew of new editors adding a death date at this article. There have been rumors or hoaxes regarding the article subject's death previously, last time around October 2015. Until we have something reliably sourced, I think the article should be placed on pending changes status. -- WV 22:20, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:05, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:47, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 03:24, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor is genre-warring. There is a discussion on the talk page but they are not participating. The article needs to be locked up for a week to give us time to get a consensus on the talk page. Betty Logan (talk) 01:25, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. To force discussion. NeilN talk to me 03:37, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from an unregistered editor who has repeatedly, over time, reinstated material that is not appropriate for Wikipedia. This page has previously had a temporary protection placed on it, however this has now expired.Jamesbushell.au (talk) 02:20, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 03:30, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of vandalism and non-constructive edits over past 2 days. Lizard (talk) 03:22, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 03:33, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. PageImp (talk) 10:51, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:57, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent edit warring in the infobox. Cganuelas (talk) 13:19, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:59, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP keeps adding unsourced/unreferenced edits, in spite of request on their Talk page to add information. This has now happened three times in a 24hr period. David J Johnson (talk) 22:11, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. David J Johnson, both versions are unsourced, no? NeilN talk to me 22:15, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – Part of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, edited somewhat regularly by the subject himself—today he's editing both as his regular IP and as JordanianExpert (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log); see the talk page and the protection log for some history. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 22:36, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:09, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruption continues after full protection expired. Edits are related to the ongoing RfC. They are either POV pushing, POINT, or premature as the RfC has not concluded yet. Requesting some intervention to stop current disruption and prevent further disruption. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 22:55, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:11, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Has no valid use. Only a vandal would create this page. Feinoha Talk 00:01, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Anna Frodesiak. NeilN talk to me 00:44, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – hoax created twice in one day by WP:SPA . OnionRing (talk) 16:01, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:00, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – Non compliance of ArbCom remedies by new users and IPs. MediaKill13 (talk) 17:20, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:00, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There has been a lot of vandalism on this page today from multiple users. Swimnteach (talk) 22:27, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:06, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism has come back and it has needed to be reverted over a half dozen times in the last two days by myself and other editors. Please protect the article for a month. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 22:28, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:07, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Random86 (talk) 20:19, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:18, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – See edit history. Article for every season of this show is indef protected due to disruptive editing. It's spilled to the template too it seems. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 21:02, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 22:12, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of IP vandalism occurring . JMHamo (talk) 21:33, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. JNHamo, can you check if Early career needs fixing? [6]--NeilN talk to me 22:08, 4 July 2016 (UTC) NeilN talk to me 22:08, 4 July 2016 (UTC) Fix ping at JMHamo --NeilN talk to me 22:09, 4 July 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP-user vandalism - Pretty much all related to Odor's brawl with Jose Bautista.Crboyer (talk) 21:38, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:04, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

06 July 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IP-hopping socks of indef blocked user DudeWithAFeud. Edits are contrary to consensus of WP:WikiProject Chemistry and guidelines at WP:TEMPLATECAT. ChemNerd (talk) 16:26, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:30, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – He was gifted a novelty lord title certification during his show last night and the article was already edited 3-4 times with people adding the title. Chris Ssk talk 17:31, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:28, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandal edits from multiple IPs based on the player's transfer to Newcastle United. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:55, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:26, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and addition of unsourced info. Egghead06 (talk) 18:05, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:24, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandal returned after protection expired. Extended semi-protection requested. Ebyabe talk - Union of Opposites18:08, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:22, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It looks like the page is under attack by an IP hopper, who persists with his/her questionable edit. Kautilya3 (talk) 14:51, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:16, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:38, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated unsourced edits added by an anon IP. Appears to be a single source, but short-term protection (no more than 7 days) may be enough to get them to move on. McDoobAU93 14:53, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:19, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I posted this question earlier and can't find where I posted to read any answers. I'm not even sure it was on this page. Anyway, I believe Momentum Worldwide is creation protected, and I've written a short stub draft for approval and to ask for the protection to be lifted. Thanks for your help. Draft: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Draft:_Momentum_Worldwide — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.252.58.115 (talk) 22:01, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks for the ping Katie. The draft remains promotional in tone, and doesn't provide strong evidence that this firm is actually notable: the Wall Street Journal article is a lightweight piece, and the NY Times article is about a brand of whisky and only briefly mentions this company's role in promoting it. The other sources don't look high quality - the Ad Week story is basically a press release, for instance. Given that there have been repeated attempts to create an article on this firm and this article isn't up to scratch I don't think it would be a good idea to remove the protection. Nick-D (talk) 08:46, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Work on it some more if you like, but unless it's drastically altered from the deleted version, I don't see it moving into the mainspace. Katietalk 14:00, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Constant IP and new account vandalism relating to Hillary Clinton not having charges recommended by FBI. Recommend temporary PC or semi protection until it cools down. Matthew Thompson talk to me! 14:01, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC is not suitable because many edits were being made. BethNaught (talk) 14:16, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 14:24, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:11, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP reverting COI book promotion back into the article, within a day of previous protection expiring. Article was previously protected due to IPs promoting the book and its BLP accusations. IP sock accusations were made against the COI user a couple of weeks ago at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HoboLow. McGeddon (talk) 14:41, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:13, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP edits are entirely non-constructive. Now that it's previous three month pending expired, requesting an indef or extended. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 05:09, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The last protection, a PC, expired in April. The last edit prior to today was 24 June. If it picks up tag me. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:23, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Ongoing highly charged political election, with noted vandalism recently. 92.5.251.204 (talk) 07:08, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined A lot of editing but how much is vandalism? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:22, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Promo campaign by IPs. The Banner talk 09:42, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We may have to increase to semi, but I'll go with this for now. Katietalk 13:59, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Under the light of the edits and editing behavior displayed so far by ProtectorOfHaq (Please, see ProtectorOfHaq (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log),2001:56a:7230:b00:508e:53d1:e1a9:a05d (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) and 2001:56a:7230:b00:445b:84dc:d278:846d (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)) and the talk history of this article, one can safely determine that this editor is a possible reincarnation of an old and/or blocked editor as he is removing the same independent, academic and verifiable content from the article which has been removed, "discussed" and "re-discussed" over and over again throughout the history of this article and then finally settled in the shape of current version which the editor is currently vandalizing. It is important to note that the editor considers himself the "Protector of Haq (Truth)." Thus, it will be prudent to protect this page on temporarily basis if not on indefinite basis before situation gets out of hand and drive each and every editor who will get involved to reinvent the wheel again. Thank you. . McKhan (talk) 08:20, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:18, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article been the target of the User:Huldra/Telstra-socks, please protect for at least a week, Huldra (talk) 09:08, 6 July 2016 (UTC). Huldra (talk) 09:08, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:20, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Variant title for long term abuse. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BuickCenturyDriver. ~ Rob13Talk 10:32, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Elockid Message me 11:38, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editors changing the team before it is official. Kante4 (talk) 04:22, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:15, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: I'm noticing an increase in vandalism activity here over the past few of days. I'm wondering if short-term semi'ing may drive out the vandals for a while... --IJBall (contribstalk) 05:49, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:16, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Two editors, as yet not autoconfirmed, are warring over this article: temporary semi-protection should prevent disruption, and force them to discuss it. . Vanamonde93 (talk) 06:30, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:19, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editors changing teams before it is official. Kante4 (talk) 16:51, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:05, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IPs. Oath2order (talk) 00:15, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:07, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – New and anonymous editors persistently adding a result for the election held on Saturday, despite there being no evidence that the outcome of the elction in the seat has been declared. AussieLegend () 03:51, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:08, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. TheUSConservative (talk) 05:42, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Some of the IP edits look reasonable, and much of the vandalism is from autoconfirmed socks. Trying PC1 as an intermediate that will allow screening of IP. The sock hits a wide range of articles and is usually RBIed quickly, so the actual solution for this article's vandalism problem, fullprot, is not needed. DMacks (talk) 07:51, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of the Telstra-vandal, see User:Huldra/Telstra-socks, Huldra (talk) 22:51, 5 July 2016 (UTC). Huldra (talk) 22:51, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Disruption only came from one IP, so it should be squashed for now. — ξxplicit 01:43, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent petty vandalism by IPv6. Suggest 30 days this time. Unless we can rangeblock all of 2607:FB90:...? Jeh (talk) 01:29, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 2607:fb90:2b00::/45 blocked 1 week. NeilN talk to me 02:32, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Magnolia677 (talk) 04:34, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing. Jetstreamer Talk 15:42, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 23:47, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 16:53, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 23:51, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent long term addition of unsourced biographical content. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 00:06, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 00:17, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated disruptive editing. TM 15:29, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 23:43, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism with changing numbers. Kante4 (talk) 18:23, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 23:40, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repetitive vandalism. LaurentianShield (talk) 21:43, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. NeilN talk to me 23:36, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism has resumed immediately after expiry of protection. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 00:25, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:28, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent trolling by an IP. –Fredddie 00:34, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 00:36, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. IP hopper NeilN talk to me 00:40, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, BLP violations by several IPs tonight. Incidentally, the article also has some long term COI and promotional problems. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 01:25, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 03:27, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 02:33, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 03:26, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi - maybe a few days, to dissuade socks of the banned user Light Current. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots02:51, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 18 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 03:15, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. clpo13(talk) 15:32, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator EdJohnston. NeilN talk to me 23:45, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fullt-protection: Since there is a mess with the team as right now there is two teams having this name in Bulgaria I would like to suggest to lock this page for a week or two, since we are going to have more information which team is the original, is it going to be one or two ect.This will save a big mess at the article. Chris Calvin (talk) 17:00, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 23:57, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 00:08, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 2 months NeilN talk to me 00:11, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent editing of the page by supporters of the site changing the name of the owner (despite citing ICANN domain register showing true owner) and claiming that the site is/was not commercial by deleting the two citations that clearly show the site ran a shop. MrMajors (talk) 16:58, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Swarm. NeilN talk to me 23:37, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Mlpearc (open channel) 18:32, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 18:47, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Vandal page. Has no legitimate use. . Feinoha Talk 20:42, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Ponyo. NeilN talk to me 23:28, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Mdann52 (talk) 20:43, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There curretly don't seem to be any helpful IP edits at all. Huon (talk) 21:16, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP under vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:50, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 23:33, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism of a living person in the news. 129.252.33.101 (talk) 21:21, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 23:32, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing. TM 21:53, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 23:34, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Multiple vandalism editions by unregistered users.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 11:21, July 5, 2016 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 23:42, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

07 July 2016

Indefinite full protection: This is my signature that I'm transcluding in my preferences. I want to protect it fully, so that only I (and the admins) can edit it. —Hexafluoride (talk) Use {{re|Hexafluoride}} when replying on your talk 15:20, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Hexafluoride, see WP:SIG#NT NeilN talk to me 15:45, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@NeilN: I know this isn't the place, but the reason for doing this was that I wanted to include {{re}} in my signature as a reminder. I used this trick to avoid having {{SUBST:}} inserted automatically. I'm going to delete the page and revert the signature, but I really would appreciate a way to include the template like this: —Hexafluoride (talk) Use {{re|Hexafluoride}} when replying on your talk 15:50, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hexafluoride, might want to ask at WP:HD. --NeilN talk to me 16:03, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – It never ends. IPs and new users continually adding false information. --allthefoxes (Talk) 15:33, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 15:59, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This is the article necessary for people of karaikal.no one should delete this. so i request semi protection wiki tamil 100 15:37, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. NeilN talk to me 15:46, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated section blanking.   Aloha27  talk  15:46, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 2607:FB90:E65:10AF:CDBD:E7D:4C0D:ED (talk · contribs) blocked by Widr (talk · contribs) Jauerbackdude?/dude. 15:55, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A number of IPs have been adding info about a NN YouTube personality. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:31, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:38, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruption by IP. Alexbrn (talk) 14:59, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 15:04, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism over the past 4 days, by at least 2 IPs. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 15:18, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 15:33, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: As soon as protection was lifted, users immediately started to vandalize again. I'm sure more would be on the way if not protected. Thanks. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 18:03, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator MusikAnimal. NeilN talk to me 19:26, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. clpo13(talk) 18:03, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:36, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – lots of vandalism in the past few days since the sexual assault allegation against him was made public . Joeykai (talk) 18:29, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:29, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. clpo13(talk) 18:34, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Bishonen. NeilN talk to me 19:24, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:52, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Widr. NeilN talk to me 19:25, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. As the Olympics draw closer, it will probably get worse, which is why I am asking for protection until after the games are finished (August 23rd). Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 18:58, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Widr. NeilN talk to me 19:25, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 14:28, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Talk page of blocked sock.   Aloha27  talk  14:32, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. Katietalk 14:38, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 17:32, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 17:34, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism from Vodkapoise sockfarm. Brianhe (talk) 09:37, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. I think they're all blocked now. Make sure they're all listed at the SPI. Katietalk 12:15, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - He is rumoured to take over a football club so the fans of said club are constantly adding false information. Thepersoncalledme (talk) 15:56, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:05, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP editor continues to add material based on non-RS sources -- it's obvious this will continue without protection. . Nomoskedasticity (talk) 16:11, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 17:14, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Severe edit warring by multiple IP addresses, including 176.204.70.84, 176.204.76.215, 2.48.73.224 and 5.107.100.142. All are obvious WP:DUCKS and all have evaded a block imposed on the IP Special:Contributions/5.107.100.142. . DSCrowned(talk) 14:38, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 14:40, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. nableezy - 15:17, 7 July 2016 (UTC) 15:17, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done NeilN talk to me 15:41, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 15:25, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 15:33, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent disruptive edits by a persistent, long-term disruptive editor that has necessitated multiple page protections in the past: all recent IP edits are by socks of the individual described at User:Salvidrim!/Macy VG IP vandal. Deli nk (talk) 16:05, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 14:13, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Same master now on another IP sock whose also active for a long time on the Ethnicities in Iran article (and which is under semi-protection as well). -. LouisAragon (talk) 19:52, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 14:10, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. High level of IP vandalism. Nickag989 (talk) 20:38, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:53, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism starting a few days ago. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:11, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 14:09, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Page repeatedly targeted by Cebr1979's infinite supply of IP socks. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 06:26, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 14:14, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Went right back to getting unsourced content and vandalism within 24 hours of protection expiring. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 08:28, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 3 months. NeilN talk to me 13:39, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 12:40, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:46, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This article was protected for a year by GB fan last July due to persistent attempts to add an unsourced description. The protection expired yesterday and the IP editing has already resumed. Cordless Larry (talk) 13:32, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 13:36, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent insertion of cherry-picked article by dynamic IP. Same dispute took place in late April. Khruner (talk) 13:38, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 1 year. NeilN talk to me 13:43, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by an anonymous vandal using multiple IPs (as evidenced by edits with similar language defaming the article subject, adding content with names of real people to attack and defame them, and removing citations without explanation). Has used at least 5 different IPs to attack this page.--Kfg12 (talk) 00:015, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.. We might consider pending changes, though I do not even see a need of PC, but definitely not sufficient level of disruption for semi-protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:49, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Please WP:SALT. Page is repeatedly being recreated. Deleted twice in last week on June 2016 and again created now. I have nominated this for AfD. Thanks. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 11:43, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Katietalk 12:21, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, multiple accounts. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 13:23, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:34, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Kenny Loggins vandal. Binksternet (talk) 23:51, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. MusikAnimal talk 02:56, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Kenny Loggins vandal. Binksternet (talk) 00:18, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. MusikAnimal talk 02:57, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Cause of disruption was RfC—RfC now closed, seems to have died down. Dschslava Δx parlez moi 02:29, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done NeilN talk to me 10:18, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive edits by non-autoconfirmed users. ViperSnake151  Talk  18:25, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined PC seems sufficient MusikAnimal talk 02:43, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Jasonski vandalizes this article every single time he makes a new sock account, which has been going on for over a month now. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 01:26, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by MusikAnimal for one month. tutterMouse (talk) 05:44, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by multiple accounts and IPs. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:17, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by DeltaQuad for 48 hours. tutterMouse (talk) 05:44, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – long history on this one - see protection log. This article is subject to WP:ARBMAC discretionary sanctions. Toddst1 (talk) 19:46, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 02:46, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by an anonymous vandal using multiple IPs who is insistent on inserting original research nonsense into this and other mythology articles (i.e., is the same vandal who lead Erebus to be page-protected). Has used at least 3 different IPs to attack this page.--Mr Fink (talk) 20:27, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 02:52, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Melonkelon (talk) 01:17, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 02:58, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by multiple IP addresses. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:55, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 02:42, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping individual with sectarian motivations. Ogress 02:43, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 02:59, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The article was finished after much research but then redacted down to a cadre rump. I have access to university research facilities to finish the article properly. Please upload some pictures also. Thank you. . Justin Grant-Duff 14:01, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. BethNaught (talk) 14:56, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism following unprotection a couple weeks ago. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 20:55, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 21:00, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite-protection: Multiple vandalism editions by unregistered users.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 17:41, July 6, 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Bagumba (talk) 00:21, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

08 July 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Two IP-related mini-wars, one about MOS:DATERANGE, one thinking Wind and Wuthering was released in 1977, not 1976 (the latter year is cited to multiple biographies). I'm not protecting as I have done a lot of work on this article, not least getting back from a failed FAC to GA, so I'm as WP:INVOLVED as they get. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:11, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 19:07, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Slow moving edit war with an IP who has not gotten consensus after he was reverted in his bold change. Izno (talk) 15:38, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. NeilN talk to me 16:07, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Same as before. IP editor insists on removing a link despite consensus to keep it. clpo13(talk) 15:54, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Consensus? NeilN talk to me 16:04, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Lack of consensus to remove it, then. I've advised the IP to try an RFC in the meantime. clpo13(talk) 16:07, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 18:34, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 19:14, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -Niceguyedc Go Huskies! 03:11, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 13:46, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edhi is in critical condition. People vandalising the page declaring him dead. Saqib (talk) 17:09, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:55, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Article has been moved several times before without discussion, and current name is by consensus. BilCat (talk) 17:44, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 17:53, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long history of WP:COI, WP:SPA editors using this article to promote themself/their boss, Fred W. Glover. . Toddst1 (talk) 12:23, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I can't see much activity on the talk page full stop, and Gkochenberger has enough edits to be autoconfirmed. If they start up again after Toddst1's revert, we can revisit it then. In any case, COI editing is not vandalism - see User:Ritchie333/Plain and simple guide to vandalism Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:14, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

temporary semi-protection: Top hit for the newly named Texas shooter because he shares his name - just to limit wikipedia's role in making people think he was the shooter if IP edits aren't rolled back quickly enough. I'd imagine the article about the event will take over within 24 hours on google. EditorInTheRye (talk) 15:57, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:49, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, adding own-name to squad lists. Embele (talk) 16:44, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:48, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.--Bozalegenda (talk) 00:03, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:44, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalised by the accused user himself. Blake Gripling (talk) 13:49, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected BethNaught (talk) 13:52, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing by different IPs, borderline vandalism. Ymblanter (talk) 15:17, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:07, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Block evasion by multiple accounts. There seems to be some uncertainty about which master or if it is both. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Europefan and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Filipz123 Meters (talk) 06:46, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:40, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing. TM 11:58, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:38, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IPs are using this page as a web host. . RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:12, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. We'll see if 3 months is enough for them to get bored. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:16, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 09:46, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, seems to have stopped, apologies for not reacting earlier.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:14, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection: Persistent vandalism committed by a multitude of IP users. Many times have these edits been reverted by several, more experienced users and I for one find it very tiring to come back to the page occasionally to remove said vandalism. Parsley Man (talk) 01:54, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 12:35, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: A transfer to not Torino has not been officially confirmed by the club's website thus is not official. The player could still fail his medical, so his new club should not be added until the club's official website or the league announce it has been completed. Random IP's keep adding the new club's information and another user is adding Albanian news articles and one from the Repubblica which is far from official.Danieletorino2 (talk) 10:26, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:36, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is a perennial target for vandalism, and will probably not need to be edited: it's fine as a simple redirect to "perfection". If an article needs to be made here at some point, the protection can be lifted. Slashme (talk) 21:51, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 09:44, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:09, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 08:46, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Gulumeemee (talk) 08:18, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 09:46, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High-level of IP vandalism by way of adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. livelikemusic talk! 13:00, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:21, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Full-protection: a lot of reverting of my content going on despite edit-warring reported and warning being issued. See [7]. Would like protection until problems addressed. --Jules (Mrjulesd) 21:27, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator EdJohnston.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:22, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Article is being vandalized nearly continuously and will probably continue to be vandalized until the situation in Dallas is resolved. Joel.Miles925 (talk) 07:08, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:18, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: An editor called "DalitNetwork" is editing the page. This seems to be a violation of Wikipedia policies.VictoriaGraysonTalk 20:40, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done @VictoriaGrayson: You want WP:COIN as protection is not used to prevent usual COI editing. NeilN talk to me 21:11, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Abusing their tp after being blocked. bonadea contributions talk 21:42, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. BethNaught (talk) 21:52, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: @Golbez: It is simply not plausible that this page is fully protected indefinitely due to a simple content dispute, and it has already been a very long 3 months since the page has been protected, which would have well repelled the edit warring user. It should be the time that we should unprotect the page. DSCrowned(talk) 15:01, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Jauerbackdude?/dude. 19:35, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Own userspace. Mlpearc (open channel) 22:30, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Materialscientist.. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (Complaints|Mistakes) 23:24, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Own userspace. Mlpearc (open channel) 22:43, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Materialscientist.. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (Complaints|Mistakes) 23:24, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Own userspace. Mlpearc (open channel) 22:44, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Materialscientist.. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (Complaints|Mistakes) 23:24, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of vandalism and vanity edits from newly-registered users. Blake Gripling (talk) 00:25, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.Jauerbackdude?/dude. 17:53, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long term abuse. see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vodkapoise. Dennis Bratland (talk) 05:32, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.Jauerbackdude?/dude. 17:54, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of IP vandalism . JMHamo (talk) 20:45, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Mattythewhite. Katietalk 21:12, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 20:58, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 21:15, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

09 July 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Different IPs restoring content added by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/The abominable Wiki troll/Archive. McGeddon (talk) 12:48, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 15:52, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Protection against new user.--SaməkTalk 13:26, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Editor is autoconfirmed. Katietalk 15:47, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Samak: - I noticed that you hadn't actually discussed this on the user's talk page. Please consider doing this next time as it's entirely possible that might have de-escalated this situation earlier. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 17:32, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Requesting protection because IP socks of Profile101 keep on leaving me unwanted and threatening messages. I've been attacked by two socks of his within four days, and to be honest, I'm quite sick of it. Class455fan1 (talk) 16:47, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 17:38, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – One of the articles that Jasonski targets often whenever he makes a new sock account. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 16:51, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Katietalk 17:37, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:23, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Katietalk 17:41, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 23:50, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Seeing as the last recent protection didn't seem to do much. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 11:20, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continues to include a hoax radio brand that is not really published / broadcasted yet. It is also maybe contains an unpredictable events that might happen in the future. Hamham31Heke!KushKush! 00:58, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 11:18, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Dynamic IPs keep changing the cast order so it is not in credit order, and refuse to communicate on the talk page. Random86 (talk) 05:00, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There appear to be constructive IP edits on this page, so I don't want to restrict their ability to edit too much. I've also warned 61.239.241.250 who is making the bulk of these edits and invited them to contribute to the talk page discussion. Please consider doing this next time. They might not listen but they might also not know it's there. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 11:14, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 23:13, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:19, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption to BLP. Qed237 (talk) 23:33, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:21, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – this unsourced content should not sign from the role that the ip hopper can change from internet they keep off those added the main cast. Oripaypaykim (talk) 05:43, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 06:29, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. IP user keeps on changing information regarding number of titles Argentine footballer, Leo Messi has received. Obvious bias within page. De88 (talk) 05:49, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 06:29, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism within a day of the previous protection expired. Yeepsi (talk) 23:32, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 04:54, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Who articles

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry relating to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Никита-Родин-2002. Edits consist of sneaky vandalism which change certifications to false values. The community has authorized the use of 30/500 protection in response to this sockpuppeteer where semi-protection fails to be effective as per this ANI thread. ~ Rob13Talk 02:23, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done NeilN talk to me 02:36, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@NeilN: Just a heads up that your edit summary said "arbitration enforcement" in it, which isn't accurate. I'm guessing that's related to the fact that Twinkle has that as the only option for 30/500? ~ Rob13Talk 02:56, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Noted. Hopefully the additional link will clarify. --NeilN talk to me 03:25, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Sro23 (talk) 05:09, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Resumed not long after old protection expired. Recommend longer protection period. Thank you. --Ebyabe talk - Attract and Repel05:15, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Sro23 and Ebyabe: Is there a related SPI case for this? ~ Rob13Talk 05:19, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Who R U? Sro23 (talk) 05:21, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm not seeing the behavioral thread from the SPI, personally, probably because I lack familiarity. The semi-protection is still warranted by the ongoing IP disruption after a previous lengthy period of semi-protection, though. ~ Rob13Talk 05:41, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. *1226 16:07, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Declined CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:17, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite-protection: Multiple vandalism editions by unregistered and registered users.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 20:29, July 8, 2016 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:08, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Talk page being targeted by IP socks of problematic editor Cebr1979. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 02:01, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Electricburst1996: We don't indef semi talk pages, sorry. NeilN talk to me 02:05, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persisitent edit warring on band members. Karst (talk) 22:16, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. NeilN talk to me 13:43, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Serious BLP problems, courtroom documents as primary sources, advocating a court case. The issue needs to be discussed on the talk page and consensus arrived at. Binksternet (talk) 20:46, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. If the editors who added the problematic content revert you, come back and we can discuss then. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:20, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Serious BLP problems, courtroom documents as primary sources, advocating a court case. The issue needs to be discussed on the talk page and consensus arrived at. Binksternet (talk) 20:50, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Northerncalifornian blocked for 24 hours Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:24, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection Repeated section blanking of well-sourced content by multiple IPs in the same range, each time claiming the content sourced by multiple sources is untrue, without offering any evidence or citations to contradict those provided. Smartyllama (talk) 13:26, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 19:10, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full Protection: High level of IP and "new user" vandalism. --Kansas Bear (talk) 16:51, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 19:18, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Protection against malicious user.--SaməkTalk 17:28, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 19:15, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors keep changing "2017" to "March of 2017" even though we've made it clear (both by adding invisible comments and through a talk page discussion) that the release date is to say "2017" until we hear otherwise. I would like to request semi-protection at least until a more specific release date is announced (most likely later this year when the Nintendo "NX" is revealed). Gestrid (talk) 20:23, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:19, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: There is a news story doing the rounds today that Nottingham City Council has (temporarily) revoked the safety certificate for the ground. Now there are IPs taking this as an opportunity to set the "capacity" of the ground to zero. Gricehead (talk) 21:07, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note, admin @KTC: has now applied full-protection to this page. This request can be ignored. Gricehead (talk) 22:16, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already done by administrator KTC. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:20, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Increasingly high level of IP vandalism as of today, and likely to continue for some time, due to a major announcement regarding activities. Same should apply to Kell Brook (below). Mac Dreamstate (talk) 21:25, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:21, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Increasingly high level of IP vandalism as of today, and likely to continue for some time, due to a major announcement regarding activities. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 21:25, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:22, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent Semi-protection: Very high level of IP vandalism, and as can be seen at the pages revision history, there is IP vandalism occurring nearly every single day. There continues to be fake album titles added, confirmed album titles being changed to fake album titles, label information being deleted, altered and replaced with fake information. No matter how many times I revert the vandalism, there is always more when I return to the page. The main page for the artist Young Thug has already received protection so I don't think this is asking very much. (Note: This is my first time requesting for page protection, so if there's anything I'm doing wrong or could do better I'd appreciate if you could tell me how either here or on my talk page) Weweremarshall (talk) 02:31, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:10, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – very persistent sock refusing to abide by Wikipedia policy. David.moreno72 (talk) 15:32, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:11, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Temporary protection needed. Fans of actors are vandalizing contents with personal interest. Charles Turing (talk) 20:37, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I see good faith edits but serious edit warring. Fortunately nobody else is working on the article, otherwise I might have had to block. I see no vandalism here - please read User:Ritchie333/Plain and simple guide to vandalism. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:18, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Recreated three times containing no encyclopedic value. -- LuK3 (Talk) 20:58, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Favonian (talk) 21:02, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

10 July 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:16, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 21:05, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:09, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 21:35, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple vandalism attacks from multiple ip users. Ike1x (talk) 21:16, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 21:38, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Politician coming to prominence in the UK whose page is recently subject to repeated pranks which have gained chortling traction on twitter (where I noticed it). Protect until the situation changes, I suggest. Alexbrn (talk) 18:00, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Indef semi would be an over-reaction at this point. 3 days of semi and 1 month of PC1 so that if there is a resumption in disruption it will not affect how this important BLP appears publicly. ( Done for the bot) BethNaught (talk) 18:08, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeatedly hit by IP-socks of Indian Historian Ramshankar (see page history). Thomas.W talk 18:08, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 2 months. NeilN talk to me 19:42, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Bad BLP issues going on right now with her recent win. Majora (talk) 18:31, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:37, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Junk food, etc.

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, of the same ilk as a week and a half ago (Glock being the inedible anomaly in subject matter: compare today's [8] by IP 2600...A51A, who also did [9] on New York-style pizza, to July 3's [10] by still-blocked IP 184....58, who comparably did [11] on June 30).

NeilN page-protected Chicago-style pizza last night but we still have, in addition to the thin-crust follies, [12] and [13] going on. KrakatoaKatie blocked a /64 range including 2600....e28f yesterday afternoon and things were quiet for a couple of hours before the 2600...7b5f fellow showed up (now blocked by Widr). I humbly suggest at least two weeks' page protection (during which time I am confident other snacks, condiments, and, uh, handguns will end up on the same list). Julietdeltalima (talk) 18:41, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. For first three. Holding off on Glock. NeilN talk to me 19:55, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... NeilN talk to me 21:06, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: someone persistently added to the page information on hypothetical legal conflict between a blogger and Gaijin Entertainment. Unfortunately, this information has no proof except the posts in 2 blogs. Author provided no information related to a court or the process itself, or even a link to a scan of court's decision with a stamp. Request for more details where toppled as 'secondary information' and appeal to the rules of Wikipedia on blogs as sources was ignored. It looks like someone wants more Wikipedia presence for that blog. It also looks unjust and I will appreciate any help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Konstantin.V.Azarov (talkcontribs) 02:48, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. NeilN talk to me 04:10, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – So many vandalism and non constructive edit for long time continues. AntanO 08:25, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:55, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Escape Orbit (Talk) 11:56, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Widr. Katietalk 13:54, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page has become a stomping around for IP's and anonymous editors. By way of adding in unsourced or poorly sourced content, and violations of WP:TVUPCOMING. livelikemusic talk! 13:08, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. –Darkwind (talk) 07:00, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – Target of IPs and newly-registered users who kept on adding BLPvio content and explicit or egregious allegations against the subject. Blake Gripling (talk) 06:37, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Rob13Talk 06:40, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry from indefinitely blocked editor. The1337gamer (talk) 08:56, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. If that is a sockpuppet then why no posting at WP:SPI? All I see is an edit war. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:01, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection — an IP editor has recently been making a lot of edits to the teams and riders table, adding unsourced content and rearranging the table in a way that goes against consensus. The article has also been getting a lot of similar stand-alone edits from IPs. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 15:10, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There's enough positive contributions from IPs to make PC worth a try. –Darkwind (talk) 07:04, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. NasssaNser 02:16, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 02:33, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Preemptive protection from potential vandalism in the coming hours (UFC 200). JC · Talk · Contributions 03:08, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. NeilN talk to me 04:00, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Preemptive protection from potential vandalism in the coming hours (UFC 200). JC · Talk · Contributions 03:10, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. NeilN talk to me 03:59, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Preemptive protection from potential vandalism in the coming hours (UFC 200). JC · Talk · Contributions 03:11, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. NeilN talk to me 03:59, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism: Turkish IPs removing mention of Gyro (food) from lead section. Just plain Bill (talk) 16:33, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not vandalism but deceptive edit summaries. NeilN talk to me 04:18, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Everymorning (talk) 01:39, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 02:32, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism probably from the same unregistered user as the IPs from yesterday and today are similar. Reverted good content that puts the layout in a better display. Reverted it after I restored the page. As it seems his IP is not a single one, page protection works better. Also falls under those articles related to UFC 200. Thanks. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 05:24, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The edits on that page represent a content dispute, not vandalism. Please discuss the matter on the article's talk page. ~ Rob13Talk 06:23, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated changes of platinum numbers without sources. Further examination shows that the numbers were false. Majora (talk) 20:10, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 04:14, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 23:35, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 04:12, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reduce from full to template-editor protection: Doesn't need FP, and I need to do a minor code upgrade to it, to match the rest of the templates in the series (most of which don't even have TEP). If FP is desirable, it can be restored after I upgrade it to use {{FormattingError|[[:{{#invoke:TEMPLATENAME|main}}]] is ... instead of a hard-coded template name.  — SMcCandlish ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ʌ≼  02:18, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This bot really can't tell protection from reduced protection requests? Seems it should be able to detect the section.  — SMcCandlish ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ʌ≼  04:10, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done ping SMcCandlish NeilN talk to me 03:58, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Gracias.  — SMcCandlish ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ʌ≼  04:10, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection Persistent edit-warring by one registered editor (and his IPs) to add cut&paste WP:Copyvio material and unsourced content. Refusal to respond to discussion requests on article Talk page and User Talk page. Hoping a brief protection will nudge the editor to the Talk page. Xenophrenic (talk) 14:19, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. You didn't say if you wanted full or semi-protection. Semi won't work and I don't think we're at full protection quite yet. I've warned the registered user against edit warring. If he or the IPs revert again, take him to AN3. Katietalk 15:45, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continuing to get IP vandalism, adding a specific silly remark. The page has already been protected twice, so I would request a long protection period this time. Thanks. Mudwater (Talk) 18:47, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 2600:1:861E:E28F::/64 36 hours. If that doesn't stop him, ping me and I'll lock it, but let's see if it's just this one guy. Katietalk 19:59, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 21:45, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 2a02:c7d:564b:d300::/64 blocked 3 months NeilN talk to me 23:18, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full-protection: Addition of unsourced content by various users. – Sabbatino (talk) 17:02, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No longer needed as it all has been confirmed about 1 hour ago. This report can be removed. – Sabbatino (talk) 17:58, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor Katietalk 18:48, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: There is no logical reason on God's green Earth why an IP address or newly hatched user should be able to edit the information I put on my page to describe myself. Usually I just let the ClueBot do its work in tidying up the vandalism, but the most recent time it didn't do that and the vandalism stayed for nine days before I noticed it myself. '''tAD''' (talk) 20:57, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 22:26, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Intense edit wars involving mostly multiple IP editors, due to the recent death of the article subject. Temporary protection for up to two weeks requested. — kashmiri TALK 22:15, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection with changes by all editors being subject to review: I've seen that this article has been having a lot of back and forth reverts. And not just IP editors, but registered users have as well been edit-warring. I suggest the page be temporarily protected with all new changes by all editors being subject to review. 117.199.93.94 (talk) 22:22, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:31, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
NeilN, I don't know if it might be appropriate to say after you've taken a decision but I think 1 week is far too less. The death of the subject will likely be relevant in the minds of people biased towards him (both favorably and unfavorably) even after 1 week considering the article's subject Burhan Wani was the most notorious militant in Kashmir. I suggest the protection time period should be atleast 1 month. Please consider increasing the time period of protection.117.199.93.94 (talk) 22:46, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Full protection for a month for an article that has never been protected before is heavy-handed. Also, the talk page is completely unused except for your two very recent edit requests. If reverts resume after protection expires there are a number of options admins can choose from, including semi-protection and blocks. --NeilN talk to me 23:13, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

11 July 2016

Semi-protection: Unnecessary edits are frequently done. Jcmpineda (talk) 07:22, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I don't see vandalism or disruption. NeilN talk to me 15:07, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Page is full of errors, false attributions and is very incomplete. Corrections are being immediately reverted to the incorrect values. Digitallymade (talk) 12:17, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 15:09, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Best known for IP socking

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Apparently a banned editor (likely Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Best known for IP) is IP socking on a number of pages. clpo13(talk) 18:39, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected First five for one month by me and Number 57; Keating article for three days by Widr. Katietalk 20:12, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page being heavily vandalized by "Best known as IP" troll. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:41, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Widr. Katietalk 20:12, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page under attack from "Best known as IP" vandal. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:42, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 20:15, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page under attack from "Best known as IP" vandal. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:42, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 20:14, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page under attack from "Best known as IP" vandal. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:43, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 20:12, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page under attack from "Best known as IP" vandal. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:52, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 20:13, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: The same anonymous, IP-hopping vandal who keeps edit-warring at this and other pages to insert original research commentary about Pete (Disney) being a wolf has returned to edit-war again, and the current level of protection is not deterring it.--Mr Fink (talk) 14:35, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Current protection is sufficient, and the IP is blocked again. Widr (talk) 14:40, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. Qed237 (talk) 14:38, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Talk page access revoked. Widr (talk) 14:42, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism by new accounts and IPs. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:54, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 17:55, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Widr. Katietalk 17:56, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Longterm semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, disruptions and IP hopping since March. N0n3up (talk) 17:38, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I'm not touching this but the reviewing admin should be aware of Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Constant_vandalism_at_Picarones NeilN talk to me 19:15, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Article has twice been converted into a redirect to the artist following the conclusion of an RfC on the article's talk page. After being converted into a redirect, subsequent editors remove the redirect without discussion and proceed to recreate the article as it existed before the RfC. As these editors have non-IP accounts, blocking IP contributions will have no effect. Am not entirely certain that this is the correct venue for this request— please advise if not, thanks!. KDS4444 (talk) 21:26, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Also, I can't see any attempt at discussion being had passed the initial RfC. Please try and request that they don't do it again, and then if it continues please do ask again! (Edit: Ask for protection again. Whoa was that a badly worded sentence...) PanydThe muffin is not subtle 11:58, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. This is the right place to request that the page be protected, but not necessarily the best place to resolve the dispute. If you're having trouble getting people to agree to the consensus reached in the RFC, that might be a sign that perhaps the discussion was closed too soon, or should be reopened. You can also seek dispute resolution. –Darkwind (talk) 12:17, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Multiple attempts by IP and non-registered users to restore content on a BLP that was recently deleted by an AFD. The restored content is also a copyright violation of his anime convention profiles. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 16:29, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 16:49, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: 23 out of last 50 edits were vandalism by IP or very new users. The articles Mathematics and Algebra are already semi-protected and this seems to be working well for them. Jrheller1 (talk) 05:30, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. If it picks up again to 11th June levels please feel free to re-request PanydThe muffin is not subtle 12:14, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Repeated attempts to change PM of the UK from David Cameron to Theresa May, who will not take office until the 13th of July 2016 Younotmenotyou (talk) 15:19, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 30 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:46, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent harassment from User:Cebr1979. Sro23 (talk) 15:29, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 15:33, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Three block-evading User:Borcker sock IPs in one day. McGeddon (talk) 16:01, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:05, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:03, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, seems to have stopped.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:26, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – this page is persistently vandalised and most edits on this page are reverts of vandalism. Flickerd (talk) 13:10, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:12, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent spam. David.moreno72 (talk) 13:59, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:03, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by person from Slovenia, using talk page as a forum. Binksternet (talk) 03:44, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've also linked to where new users and IP addresses can request edits so that we don't accidentally deny constructive users access to discussions. I really hope that's not going to bite me in the butt. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 12:07, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: The entity is an adult video streaming website. It was created in May 2014. Beginning on December 2014, the page has been experiencing repeated IP vandalism (see [14]). They are almost always non-sensical vandalism (ie blanking the page [15] or inserting nonsense text [16] [17]). It has been going on since 2014 with no stop. They are coming from different IP addresses and not one user. Please apply indefinite semi-protection to end the vandalism. It's surprising that this wasn't applied years before. CerealKillerYum (talk) 05:34, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 09:34, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Newbiepedian (talk · contribs · X! · logs) 12:45, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 12:47, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 2602:306:3357:BA0:9037:9D09:231C:D4E2 (talk) 16:47, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. –Darkwind (talk) 04:43, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:19, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:57, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs have been adding unreferenced content to this page for quite a while. Blocking the IP does not seem to be effective at the moment. Page has been protected in the past for similar reasons. -- samtar talk or stalk 11:57, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 11:59, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 19:05, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:26, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The page is currently under attack by harassment-minded IP editor. As can be construed from his contrib. log, I am his target. Also, he is an IP-hopper. In a message in his talk page, he has confessed to both. Codename Lisa (talk) 21:29, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. @Codename Lisa: Please ping me if they reappear on another IP. ~ Rob13Talk 03:32, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – lost of vandalism in the last few weeks. Joeykai (talk) 05:03, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:10, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.Perhaps it can be set to pending changes. Over the past 24 hours an edit war on members has emerged. Karst (talk) 16:45, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Semi-protecting and PC are inappropriate because one of the editors involved in the content dispute is autoconfirmed. –Darkwind (talk) 04:41, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:26, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:59, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending Changes: Persistent IP vandalism from unregistered users — Preceding unsigned comment added by Genericscreen (talkcontribs) 02:02, 11 July 2016‎ (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:55, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template. JC · Talk · Contributions 23:52, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. ~ Rob13Talk 23:59, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template. JC · Talk · Contributions 00:18, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. ~ Rob13Talk 00:24, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template. JC · Talk · Contributions 00:18, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. ~ Rob13Talk 00:24, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template. JC · Talk · Contributions 00:18, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. ~ Rob13Talk 00:24, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP socks of Cebr1979 continued to edit after protection expired. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 02:03, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 03:18, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Was protected temporarily, vandalised within days of being unprotected. Particularly horrible as this is persistent vandalism about a high-profile disabled child. Boleyn (talk) 15:52, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected. Courcelles (talk) 00:44, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An other BLP under vandalism in European Championship final. Qed237 (talk) 21:29, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:34, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Omni Flames (talk) 01:08, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:31, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatedly recreated. Kindly SALT. . Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 18:26, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 23:55, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of vandalism occurring . JMHamo (talk) 21:25, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Nyttend.. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (Complaints|Mistakes) 00:05, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Sro23 (talk) 22:24, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by Materialscientist. -- SA 13 Bro (talk) 22:38, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Is being targeted by ipsocks of User:Cebr1979. Sro23 (talk) 23:26, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 23:30, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

12 July 2016

Semi-protection: Unnecessary edits are frequently done. Statements with no citations are always added. It requires permanent semi-protection for future vandalism. Jcmpineda (talk) 13:19, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Jcmpineda please read WP:NO-PREEMPT, Wikipedia:Protection_policy#Guidance_for_administrators and, perhaps, WP:OWN. NeilN talk to me 14:26, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Please SALT. Repeatedly recreated. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 15:33, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 19:03, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Created and deleted as vandalism within minutes. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:49, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Widr (talk) 19:08, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Short descriptive header

Permanent semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Unable to control this IP. Please semi-protect this template urgently.--kkm010 talk to me 08:11, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. @Kkm010: Looks to me as if you're both edit warring. NeilN talk to me 14:41, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 15:53, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 18:39, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated after meeting speedy deletion criteria. GSMR (talk) 17:24, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 18:35, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent instability and problematic editing. Perhaps this can force the IPs to go to the talk page and discuss their edits. Étienne Dolet (talk) 18:18, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm happy to remove it earlier if there's discussion on the talk page. ~ Rob13Talk 18:22, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeated recreation by this non-notable individual who claims to be the head of something called "Uzomedia" and his sockdrawer (I have filed an SPI regarding the new accounts involved with this new iteration of the article). There have been multiple iterations of this name with different capitalization, punctuation, spacing, and ordering of "Uzoma" and "Michael". Query whether some kind of edit filter or preemptive salting can be effectuated with respect to "Uzomedia," which seems to be the common denominator of the socks and speedied articles emanating therefrom over the past several months. (I'm not an admin so I can't go dig diffs/links of the long-speedied other Michael/Uzoma/Uzomedia articles up, but there are at least seven of them; I'm just like this about names, and I've been seeing "Uzoma", "naija" as another username component, and "Uzomedia" repeatedly since the beginning of 2016 at least.) Julietdeltalima (talk) 18:32, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. @Julietdeltalima: Wouldn't hurt to make an edit filter request. The link is at WP:EFR. Katietalk 18:43, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/جواد رمضانی شوراب. GZWDer (talk) 15:47, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 16:02, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – page being targeted by IP socks of The UPN Vandal. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 15:56, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 17:11, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TwoTwoHello (talk) 16:01, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:04, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ongoing disruptive editing, looks like the editor will sock. -- samtar talk or stalk 08:07, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Widr. NeilN talk to me 14:30, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Cos article was deleted. Poor, confused bot. NeilN talk to me 15:12, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: 700+ transclusions. George Ho (talk) 08:09, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 14:33, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dynamic IP repeatedly adding (sometimes up to a hundred) minor and possibly imaginary "blue cat with green eyes" background characters. McGeddon (talk) 08:39, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I have also left a message on the article talk page. Yaris678 (talk) 12:39, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Til Eulenspiegel IPs have been reverting page. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:07, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Doug Weller. NeilN talk to me 14:21, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple anonymous vandals. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 00:49, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 03:23, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Peristent vandalism from IP hoppers Katniss 02:47, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 03:24, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Amaury (talk | contribs) 03:52, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Requesting immediate archiving... Short-term protection has now expired. NeilN talk to me 14:30, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated edit warring against consensus at WP:WikiProject Chemistry and guidelines at WP:TEMPLATECAT by IP socks of indef blocked user DudeWithAFeud. Disruptive editing by same editor caused recent semiprotection of Template:Fluorine compounds. ChemNerd (talk) 11:07, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 (talk) 12:23, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism form an Brazilian IP. Given experience from other cases involving Brazilian IP vandalism, blocking the IP will not work because the editor will simply switch to a new one. —Farix (t | c) 23:53, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Nakon 00:53, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Redirect has been repeatedly undone by sockpuppets of blocked user Wattsj528. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 00:05, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 00:53, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection Subject got into Facebook trending for her opinion on the Dallas police shooting; all sources being added about the statement hardly meet WP:RELIABLE. Nate (chatter) 05:03, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 (talk) 07:07, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article attracts IP Trolls and vandals, see their activities over the past months. Former 3-month blocks helped but once they expire all Trolls are back. Denniss (talk) 06:13, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 (talk) 07:17, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 15:09, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I only see about 1 edit containing vandalism. Music1201 talk 16:14, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 00:38, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TM 16:07, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 00:38, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Resumption of IP vandalism. Please re-protect for a longer period. Thank you. Ebyabe talk - Opposites Attract18:06, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 00:40, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite-protection: Multiple vandalism editions by unregistered and registered users.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 22:08, July 11, 2016 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 00:47, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite-protection: Multiple unreliable editions by registered users.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 22:16, July 11, 2016 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 00:34, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated additions of unsourced episode titles that have not been released in any reliable source by IPs, all clear logged out edits of Kaido of the Beasts (talk · contribs). —Farix (t | c) 02:56, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 03:25, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Longterm semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, disruptions and IP hopping since March. N0n3up (talk) 17:38, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I have changed the code that precedes that comment because the bot seems to be programmed to prematurely archive threads that contain it even though they have no result. Softlavender (talk) 00:58, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Considering the page has never been protected, I don't think "longterm semi" is the right way to go. Edits are very infrequent, and there are some good contributions from anons. Finally, it seems this is a potential content dispute, in which case shutting out the anons is not okay. All things considered PC seems best. We'll start with a month MusikAnimal talk 01:16, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit war is occurring between a named user and one with a floating IP. 331dot (talk) 09:53, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Music1201 talk 16:11, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Melonkelon (talk) 02:54, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Courcelles (talk) 03:10, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several recent flurries of libelous vandalism, using fabricated sources. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 02:59, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 03:12, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unsalting Hello. I was hoping that LaToya Forever could be unprotected from creation so I can add an article I have written on her, it was protected in November 2013 due to being created by a banned user. Full disclosure I am being paid by someone who contacted me through Fiverr to create an article that is within Wikipedia guidelines, full sources etc. to demonstrate the notability of the subject. I have written the article and I believe it is both neutral and factual and should be acceptable within Wikipedia guidelines. The article is currently residing at User:MPJ-DK/Draft Space 2 but due to the actions of a banned user over two-and-a-half years ago it's still just a draft. I was hoping that after reading the article that you could unlock the page and let me create it? Please let me know if you have any concerns etc. always happy to address any issues there may be with my request. Original admin is User:NawlinWiki and I posted on his page, but there is no activity since March so I took it here instead, hope that is okay??  MPJ-DK  02:41, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected I have my doubts about notability, but given you're in good standing and it isn't an A7 candidate, done. After all, AFD is over thataway, not here. Courcelles (talk) 03:18, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ViperSnake151  Talk  22:31, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 00:48, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Problematic article that suffers from persistent unsourced edits, mainly from anonymous IPs. Most common alteration is to move TLC ahead of Destiny's Child in the section "Best-selling groups worldwide", contrary to the cited source and providing no edit commentary or alternative source for the claim. These changes have been going on for many months now – there have been 12 of them alone since June 1st: [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29]. Richard3120 (talk) 23:15, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 00:50, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Page-move vandalism – Page was move-vandalised today. Please move-protect. Dr. K. 23:24, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected Nakon 00:50, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by multiple IPs. Dreamsarenotreal (talk) 23:41, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 00:51, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Page being targeted by IP socks of The UPN Vandal. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 23:51, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 00:52, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Toy Story 2 vandal is back. EvergreenFir (talk) 00:11, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You beat me to it! User talk:107.77.236.31, 107.77.233.48 and 107.77.234.86 are IPs involved at this time. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 00:29, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Done by MusikAnimal. ~ Rob13Talk 01:00, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:43, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 00:35, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:44, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 00:36, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism. 117.192.167.52 (talk) 22:16, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 00:36, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 14:32, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 00:37, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Extensive vandalism that is only expected to intensify in the coming days, due to the ongoing nature of events involving the leadership of said Party. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 17:25, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 00:39, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anonymous editors have been making unsourced and disruptive edits regarding the language used. clpo13(talk) 17:37, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 00:40, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Three block-evading User:Borcker sock IPs in as many hours. McGeddon (talk) 18:15, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 23:31, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 35 edits by 18 users in 11 days. [30]. Only change was to add note about what not to add. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:25, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 00:41, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Users and IPs continue to assert the series is over when there is no official announcement after previous protection expired. There's a statement from Brec regarding the season two finale, but nothing explicit about the series. Although even there were, Brec is is only an employee and does not speak for the show. Amaury (talk | contribs) 18:56, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 00:42, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – This title was used to bypass create protection at Yan Naing Oo (footballer) and Yan Naing Oo. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:43, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 00:43, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – I don't know what the dispute is about, but both editors involved ought to know better. clpo13(talk) 19:58, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 00:44, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – IP was blocked for disruptive editing and vandalism, continues to remove denied unblock requests from page, using page for personal attacks. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:19, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. NeilN talk to me 20:25, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 22:14, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 00:47, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. EvergreenFir (talk) 22:20, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --joe deckertalk 00:47, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Most edits are unsourced. User:Iamthemostwanted2015

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 00:33, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism from some new editors. -- LuK3 (Talk) 19:54, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 22:26, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:29, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 22:25, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:31, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Wasw there some kind of big episode lately or something? Courcelles (talk) 22:19, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Longterm semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, disruptions and IP hopping since March. N0n3up (talk) 17:38, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I'm not touching this but the reviewing admin should be aware of Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Constant_vandalism_at_Picarones NeilN talk to me 19:15, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Block IPs: persistent IP disruption. Glitchygirl (talk) 14:14, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 17:58, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This is a very important page for history, and military history, rome, classical etc etc. Iazyges (talk) 17:02, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 17:57, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism with different IP. Changing name and POB. Matthew_hk tc 20:18, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 20:27, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Short descriptive header

Indefinite semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism if left unchecked. Volunteers who helped editing the pages, including myself, have been struggling to deal with the vandalism occurred in the pages. DarryLaz (talk) 12:43, 11 July 2016 (UTC)DarryLaz (talk) 00:45, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 17:56, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

13 July 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – I notice that since she just got married there has been a back and forth on what name to apply. I'll open something about it on the talk page. Fyunck(click) (talk) 21:15, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:38, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated removal of sourced content by IPs and new accounts. Jim1138 (talk) 21:18, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:41, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term anon vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:40, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:43, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Edit as Vandalism of User:Bertrand101 sock. LG-Gunther :  Talk  13:54, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Katietalk 16:42, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – 2 IPs spamming links continuously today. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 15:24, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:01, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – 2 IPs spamming links continuously today. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 15:24, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:03, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. clpo13(talk) 16:01, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Katietalk 16:39, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continual addition of hoax players to the squad, usually by IP users. Many reviewers, acting in good faith, have mistakenly accepted them. See the page history for the reversion I had to make. Pending changes protection just doesn't appear to be working. Amccann421 (talk) 16:21, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:04, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued attempts to add to appearances count with friendly appearances when friendly game appearances do not count, as well as 'joke' edits. One month pp until 2016–17 Premier League starts would be great. Zaostao (talk) 20:59, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:09, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism since mid-July. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:45, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:04, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There is a sudden attack on this page by IPs from the US east coast, adding WP:OR and modifying even direct quotes from sources. Kautilya3 (talk) 20:03, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:06, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Continued attempts at re-adding conspiracy related material despite attempts from multiple editors to inform of reliability. Reverting is getting out of hand. Also, high visibility article. Rgoodermote (talk) 20:10, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 20:15, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. clpo13(talk) 17:04, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Katietalk 19:39, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Due to an editor with a COI removing large amounts of sourced information. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:45, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Jonathunder. @RickinBaltimore: The registered account has enough edits to be autoconfirmed on Saturday, so heads up. Katietalk 19:38, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Edit filter log shows some sockpuppets vandalizing. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:58, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 19:22, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
They've been targeting lots of disney related articles lately as well, I think it might be related to this spi. Sro23 (talk) 19:41, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JudgeRM 19:39, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 19:42, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Opencooper (talk) 12:07, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 16:47, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruption continued after protection expired. Same issue with an ip hell bent on removing German air dates. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:46, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Added List of Kung Fu Panda: Legends of Awesomeness episodes and Kung Fu Panda: Legends of Awesomeness. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:57, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:24, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is being vandalized by an IP editor. The previous page protection has expired. Gestrid (talk) 18:07, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 18:26, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: An editor was insisting May wasn't PM yet and got the page fully protected. However, he was incorrect and she is officially PM -see http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jul/13/theresa-may-becomes-britains-prime-minister Electoralist (talk) 16:57, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done NeilN talk to me 17:06, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Disruptive editing by IPs. 175.110.48.234 (talk) 07:17, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:28, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: The article has been a long-time target of Dan Joshua B. Apura. Sixth of March 09:15, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:32, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. changing artists from the real ones in fake ones. The Banner talk 09:28, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:32, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – lot of vandalism, probably will get worse as the Olympic approach. Protection until after the games is requested. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 14:25, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 16:40, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Disruptive activity has been pretty low, so I don't feel that the pending-changes protection that was applied on January 22 alongside the semi-protection which has since expired is really necessary anymore. Amaury (talk | contribs) 05:13, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Callanecc:--Ymblanter (talk) 07:45, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined There are still quite a high number of reverts happening, which make it look like PC is defnitely still needed (perhaps even semi-protection). Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 12:33, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Specifically for some IP users inserting external links which supposedly link to new episodes in this season of this show. [33][34]. Clearly spam linking. This article has been previously semi-protected for the same problem, not too long ago. I could've also requested semi-protection here, but other recent IP users' edits appear to be constructive. MPFitz1968 (talk) 01:35, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Another spam link [35] since I filed the request, and it tripped the filter "repeated addition of external links by non-autoconfirmed user". MPFitz1968 (talk) 04:45, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined pending changes will do nothing here. I've blocked the latest IPs and accounts and the latest spam link has been blacklisted. There's not much else that can be done other than suggest you come back if you want semi-protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:08, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Ever since 04:29, 28 April 2015, repeated insertions of mentions of Puerto Rico as a place / culture where the shaka sign is used, most of them by the same IP (65.96.74.31) and all of them unreferenced. See Talk:Shaka sign#Puerto Rico. -Thnidu (talk) 04:14, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:21, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther :  Talk  04:41, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:21, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther :  Talk  04:42, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:22, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther :  Talk  04:42, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:22, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Jasonski continues to vandalize this article almost every time that he makes a new sock account. I requested semi-protection for this article a few days ago and am not sure why it was declined. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 16:11, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:23, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Key Stage articles

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP's repeatedly making unexplained removals. Sro23 (talk) 19:40, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done: blocked some IPs, protected two pages.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:56, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: A possible sockpuppet of the now-banned user StealthForce continuously adds this line of misinformation: "With Electronic dance troupe Light Balance coming in fourth place." 2601:601:4002:E260:88AF:B8D7:89C3:4934 (talk) 13:49, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 6 months. NeilN talk to me 15:06, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – A lot of unsourced content being added. JMHamo (talk) 14:49, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:58, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism article as Sock of User:Cow cleaner 5000. LG-Gunther :  Talk  08:17, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 09:18, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent attempts to change capacity - people need to engage in the Talk discussion on the subject. Mike1901 (talk) 12:45, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:09, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP editors keep changing the period, directly contradicting the source, without providing another source. nyuszika7h (talk) 14:18, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:27, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – On-going test edits and additions of unsourced or poorly sourced content. livelikemusic talk! 12:16, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:44, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – The user was blocked after an SPI showed they were the sock of a now-blocked user. SInce then the user had taken to write rant after rant as to how they were falsely accused. At this point it might be necessary to lock down talk page access and allow them to appeal via UTRS.. . RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:50, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Talk page access revoked by The Wordsmith NeilN talk to me 23:25, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Dispute over wording regarding a relationship. One version says simply that it was illegal while the other elaborates on the illegality. I'm requesting protection to stop the edit warring and encourage a discussion. clpo13(talk) 22:16, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. NeilN talk to me 23:13, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term full protection: This article is under pending changes, but it is clearly not working here. Currently undergoing edit warring by autoconfirmed users and IP's alike. Article has a VERY long history of unsourced content being added to it along with the failure to be apt in discussing the changes/edits on the article talkpage. 172.58.40.143 (talk) 01:32, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawing request. Talkpage discussion has now started. 172.58.41.254 (talk) 04:17, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.58.41.254 (talkcontribs) 04:24, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated dubious unexplained/unref changes and nonimprovement from sock(s) in 49.* IP range. Dl2000 (talk) 02:51, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:14, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Page-move vandalism. Amaury (talk | contribs) 05:26, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:24, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Page-move vandalism. Amaury (talk | contribs) 05:26, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:25, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An Italian IP-hopping anon continues to "adjust" the band's timeline. The changes are not consistent, they go against the guideline and introduce several problems. Locking to new editors for seven days--one day for each IP used--would be appreciated. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:35, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:27, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Own user space. —cyberpowerChat:Online 06:55, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:29, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs are largely disruptive. Edits are contentious or disruptive as most are POV pushing or counter to on-going rfcs and discussions on the talk page. Requesting semi-protection. EvergreenFir (talk) 07:28, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – It's hotting up with people adding that she is already PM: she isn't, but damping down the excitement will not be easy without a touch of semiprotection please. Otherwise it's just one of those gun-jumping things like the start of the football season ... DBaK (talk) 08:20, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done: 1 day semi + 2 weeks PC protection. It will probably require more in the future, but this will get us through today. -- zzuuzz (talk) 08:47, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion, three IPs restoring bits of Locked from inside's edits since their recent block as a sock. McGeddon (talk) 09:14, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:31, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations – Controversial politician and long term vandal target. Valenciano (talk) 11:16, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:39, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: This page is being moved from "Go" to "GO". I suggest it becomes admin move protected for the next few weeks while the hype dies down. Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:21, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 12:35, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pending changes protection does not work here. The only IP edits on this page are hugely disruptive, and it is annoying to force editors to waste time reverting rubbish when the page could otherwise be semi'd. Please semiprotect this page so as to stop this from continuing. . RGloucester 21:46, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 00:42, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: One IP from the 2603 range has been battling multiple editors on several issues. HkCaGu (talk) 23:14, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 2a03:4a80:4:100::/56 blocked 24 hours for edit warring. NeilN talk to me 23:20, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism from multiple IPs. -- Irn (talk) 01:09, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 01:24, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Some level of IP vandalism. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 16:11, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined What I'm seeing is a lot of editing activity (since the decision was announced today) but not a lot of vandalism. I see some editing disagreement but no clear cut content dispute (it seems more like confusion and light disagreement that is normal with the release of new information). I don't think semi-protection is the right call for this pattern of editing. If blatant disruption occurs, please re-request. Airplaneman 19:39, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Personal attacks by Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Best known for IP. clpo13(talk) 22:00, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 00:35, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – More block evasion and personal attacks by Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Best known for IP. clpo13(talk) 22:11, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 00:33, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated disruptive IP editing. JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 23:09, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 23:16, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Looks like Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Best known for IP. clpo13(talk) 21:42, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Materialscientist. ~ Rob13Talk 22:57, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Looks like Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Best known for IP. clpo13(talk) 21:44, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Materialscientist. ~ Rob13Talk 22:56, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary (long-term) semi-protection: Since March different IPs have been adding obviously fake titles to the list of albums. All of them are crude, and some of these include offensive slurs. There are dozens of these edits, but the time between them ranges from hours to weeks. Grayfell (talk) 21:45, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 23:04, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated BLP vio by sock(s).--TMCk (talk) 17:28, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Katietalk 18:32, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Most of the recent revisions of this article have been vandalism from IP users. 13aunihert (talk) 17:34, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 18:31, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:00, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:59, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:18, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 21:01, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

14 July 2016

Semi-protection: Frequent vandalism. It was protected before but the vandalism returned when the protection was lifted. Thepersoncalledme (talk) 14:06, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 18:59, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Much speculation that he will "reportedly" be picked as Donald Trump's running mate. No confirmation either way. Some edits are vandalism, others are merely WP:CRYSTAL. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:46, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay now there's more vandalism.[36][37] – Muboshgu (talk) 17:19, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 18:05, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Receiving a large amount of mostly IP vandalism. Kosack (talk) 18:51, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 18:56, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Re-occurrence after expiration of last protection. Elisfkc (talk) 04:25, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 11:47, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Frequent vandalism. Hmlarson (talk) 05:29, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 17:38, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Just a day would be enough (or alternatively, block the ip range vandalising the article). This actor's movie released last month but I guess it's released only now in some other place from where the BLP is being vandalised. . Lourdes 13:56, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 18:02, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

American Saddlebred (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Temporary semiprotection. Lots of IPs and SPAs whitewashing. As soon as one quits another starts. White Arabian Filly Neigh 21:45, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Only appears to last a few days every month. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 11:40, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-Hopping user keeps disruptive editing and edit warring. Ilber8000 (talk) 22:06, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I would also highly suggest warning the IP users on their talk pages. If nothing else it's a good faith attempt to engage them in dialogue. AGF might be fruitless but it's always worth a shot. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 11:43, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP disruption by a blocked editor; please see ANI:Disruptive IP editor. Thank you, K.e.coffman (talk) 04:50, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 05:51, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Callanecc: Thank you for blocking, but the editor is already back as Special:Contributions/79.113.132.154. This editor is hopping IPs and the one I just listed is at least 15th in the past six weeks. Semi-protection may be needed for the above page. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:05, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@K.e.coffman: Which ever pages we semi protect they'll find another one so I'd prefer to use rangeblocks to combat them. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 06:12, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-Hopping user keeps reinserting voice actor information despite being told repeatedly that this is against the MOS FILM Guidelines and the lead too long tag that was just removed after culling the lead. Not listening, clearly no intention to change. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 21:45, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., let us try pending changes.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:34, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs are replacing the content with unsourced OR. McSly (talk) 22:15, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

IP was blocked by @Materialscientist: but a brand new user just repeated the same edit. --McSly (talk) 01:57, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 06:04, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Remove Blank Page tagged on their articles. some IP Talk Page are removed those warning and the Sock puppet tag are those blanked the IP talk pages as sock of User:TV5Ozamiz. LG-Gunther :  Talk  01:30, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Just blank the page. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 05:54, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 17:53, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 05:35, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term anon vandalism and general BLP violations. -- LuK3 (Talk) 23:23, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. kelapstick(bainuu) 05:55, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – General vandalism and obvious BLP violations. -- LuK3 (Talk) 23:46, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 05:57, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated addition of factual errors, spam links, or other edits considered disruptive - and this is such a well-known product and will continue to be a target for the foreseeable future. Let's start with PC and go from there. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 01:36, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 05:55, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Regular vandalism – this article has been protected before and should be protected again. As with oher articles about bodily excretions, it seems to attract vandals. EvMsmile (talk) 04:25, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 05:52, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous vandalism by several IP-addresses. IlyushkaTalk!Contribs 04:51, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 05:45, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism including removal of sourced content and controversies from the article by new editors and IPs. Drikulaeritalk 20:21, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And we don't do indefinite full. NeilN talk to me 20:47, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sockpuppet of Cebr1979 is currently vandalizing the page. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:39, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Not quite yet please. NeilN talk to me 20:46, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:12, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism as Sock of User:TV5Ozamiz. LG-Gunther :  Talk  00:57, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 01:58, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi Protection Continue edit warring and content dispute. Regarding hubs for airlines. TravelLover37 (talk) 16:20, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined procedural - article moved and new title fully protected Katietalk 19:44, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Music1201 talk 18:10, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Pending changes looks to be handling it NeilN talk to me 18:28, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Since her win at Wimbledon we seem to have a steady stream of new signed in users and new IP's adding NPOV and non-discussed wording. Maybe it'll slow down in a week or so. Fyunck(click) (talk) 00:17, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - CorbieV 00:33, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

15 July 2016

Semi ...I really shouldn't have to explain this one. TimothyJosephWood 15:13, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Quite a lot of decent edits by IPs. Please re-report if significant disruption occurs. NeilN talk to me 15:59, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Page is being targeted by socks of User:Who R U?. Sro23 (talk) 19:05, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Favonian. until October 15, 2016. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (Complaints|Mistakes) 19:25, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs making unexplained removals. . Sro23 (talk) 19:56, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 20:00, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP's making repeated unexplained removals, protection recently expired. Sro23 (talk) 19:57, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 20:00, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dynamic IPs edit-warring adding spam. Dr. K. 13:56, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 18:26, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent re-addition of unsourced material by IP since July 11. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 16:16, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 18:35, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IPv6 vandalism. 172.56.42.7 (talk) 18:43, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 19:10, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ip keeps add factual errors as Namco had no part in this game. Digifan23 (talk) 07:45, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~ Rob13Talk 13:25, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Fake casting info by dynamic IPv6. Geraldo Perez (talk) 11:41, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~ Rob13Talk 13:30, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – 2 editors are constantly uploading a copyright image (which has so far been deleted 3/4 times on Commons under different titles), Thanks,. –Davey2010Talk 14:44, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:05, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Brilliant thanks Neil. –Davey2010Talk 16:59, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some IP vandalism starting this morning. -- LuK3 (Talk) 15:04, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Foxj. NeilN talk to me 16:00, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – A controversial BLP, vandalism started as soon as the protection expired. Mar11 (talk) 15:19, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:53, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Constant addition of unsourced materials for a transfer that is yet to be official. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 15:21, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:54, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP violations and IP vandalism today. -- LuK3 (Talk) 15:41, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:47, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lift move protection: Move-protected since 2008. There is a RM at the talk following the content split, which I closed in favor of moving to Daredevil (Marvel Comics character). While at it, please also move the page. No such user (talk) 09:34, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Suggest creating a dab page so no one takes it upon themselves to create another article. Katietalk 13:41, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. EvergreenFir (talk) 05:24, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. –Darkwind (talk) 07:03, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 05:52, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 13:23, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There seems to be a dispute about the manner in which doctoral students are added to this page about this economist. Editing under different names/IPs. 331dot (talk) 08:35, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've also reverted the contested edit with a edit summary asking the IP to discuss it on the talk page. Yaris678 (talk) 11:32, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sudden increase in vandalism post the France truck attack. A 2 or 3 day temporary protection would take the load of the pending changes log. Lourdes 13:12, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 13:27, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – On-going socking by MariaJaydHicky (blocked again yesterday at Joesob and numerous IPs). . SummerPhDv2.0 13:18, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 13:34, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IPs adding false names, genres etc. —IB [ Poke ] 13:30, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 13:35, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Insertion of misinformation and speculation. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (Complaints|Mistakes) 00:08, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Semi seem a bit much but we shouldn't have those edits show up either. If others feel I"m being too soft, then we can add semi as well. Ricky81682 (talk) 00:11, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
please close it to IPs. Too much POV going on in early daysLihaas (talk) 02:27, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent target of anons and/or Maelbros sockpuppets who keep on adding falsified or hoax information on the shows being aired. Blake Gripling (talk) 05:42, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –Darkwind (talk) 07:05, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dr. K. 05:59, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –Darkwind (talk) 07:08, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Longterm semi-protection: Page is being attacked by an anonymous vandal using multiple IPS, and who has a long history of attacking this and other pages in order to insert WP:original research opinions, and then edit-war to preserve said original research opinions, and who will happily leap from one IP to another in order to evade blocks and continue edit-warring. Said vandal has already used two IPs in the last 12 hours to attack this page.--Mr Fink (talk) 01:37, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I've blocked the whole IP range the vandal was using, which should be enough to keep it under control. –Darkwind (talk) 02:22, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Majora (talk) 03:16, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Acroterion. ~ Rob13Talk 04:00, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sro23 (talk) 03:46, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 04:03, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Long-term low-frequency IP vandalism, changing airdates without edit summary and without providing a citation. BrightRoundCircle (talk) 10:16, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. @BrightRoundCircle: Looking over the history, it appears it's almost always two IPs doing the changes. One was recently blocked for 2 weeks. If either IP pops up again, a long-term block would be appropriate. If it remains only those two IPs doing the unsourced changes, then long-term blocks are more appropriate than protection. Feel free to drop a talk page message if disruption starts up again, and I've also watchlisted the page. ~ Rob13Talk 21:37, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – I see battlefield. George Ho (talk) 21:40, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Only one vandal in the history and no other problems, but please bring it back if it continues. -- zzuuzz (talk) 22:10, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – This article has gone through edit warring with POV users being blocked. I'm certain that the editor matches a previously blocked editor to the letter, so this is WP:EVADE. Iryna Harpy (talk) 01:34, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator BU Rob13. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 02:22, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term vandalism and BLP violations. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:00, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 02:28, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Evidently two IP's are having a ****ing contest via this article. Evidently one IP is involved with the subject article organization and the other IP is a competitor or opponent of the articles subject. Clearly a short period of protection is needed and both IP's need to be directed to the proper forum to resolve this issue. Safiel (talk) 02:23, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 02:25, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 16:27, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I see only one disruptive edit in the past two days. ~ Rob13Talk 21:26, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from IPs. Drikulaeritalk 17:27, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Rob13Talk 21:29, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article is a target of short sporadic bursts of high vandalism, as per the history, and should be protected to prevent more such vandalism. The previous protection just expired today. Kylo Ren (talk) 01:12, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –Darkwind (talk) 01:30, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Was previously semi-protected for a couple weeks, and vandalism has resumed following the unprotection. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 21:35, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 00:34, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – BLP protection removed on 12 July 2016. Article was promptly vandalized again twice in the same manner as vandalism occurring piror to 6 June 2016. AldezD (talk) 22:41, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 00:35, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some vandalism spanning the entire last month (and beyond). -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:01, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 01:03, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by IPs at random occasions. Hinting possible socks when look into. Except vandalism, the article has stable content and is a GA prospect, currently under peer review. Protection needed extending 3 months least. Charles Turing (talk) 19:02, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Charles Turing: Looking back, there does appear to be problems with some IPs, but others have participated productively. Let's try pending changes for a couple weeks and see how that goes. Feel free to ping me when protection is about to expire and I'll take a look. ~ Rob13Talk 00:31, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Reports are that Pence will be the VP nominee of Donald Trump, which would necessitate him ending his campaign in this race. That has not been confirmed: WP:CRYSTAL. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:39, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 00:32, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistant IP vandalism. Couple of days should probably suffice, as the vandalism seems to happen for a bit then go away. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:57, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 00:32, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Has been the subject of repeated disruptive editing such as adding comments about stolen valor in several places throughout the article. EricEnfermero (Talk) 21:03, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 00:33, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Another useless page that the vandal loves creating. Feinoha Talk 00:23, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected ~ Rob13Talk 00:25, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SA 13 Bro (talk) 21:49, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- zzuuzz (talk) 22:07, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unofficial trade information being added. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 22:14, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:27, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
And was again vandalized and reverted in the time it took me to click back on my watchlist. TimothyJosephWood 22:52, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:53, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent instability and problematic editing. Perhaps this can force the IPs to go to the talk page and discuss their edits. Étienne Dolet (talk) 05:38, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 17:55, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – A new editor wants to promote a supporters group (fan club) and has been reverted three times and warned twice for not supplying a reference. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:01, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 17:58, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP vandalism. IP user 108.31.142.94 (also using 66.26.242.251) continues to remove user DJMickeDC's added content. After several undos, it is apparent it will not stop. Micke (talk) 06:38, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 18:00, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent instability and problematic editing. Perhaps this can force the IPs to go to the talk page and discuss their edits. Étienne Dolet (talk) 16:19, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. For sockpuppetry, rather than the content dispute. It seems obvious who those IPs are. ~ Rob13Talk 21:44, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Sro23 (talk) 19:59, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 31 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 20:02, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

16 July 2016

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 117Avenue (talk) 20:39, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 21:00, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – lots of "new" editors target this talk-page with rubbish, Huldra (talk) 20:43, 16 July 2016 (UTC). Huldra (talk) 20:43, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 20:56, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Disruptive vandal using multiple IP accounts as well as blocked accounts User:Walesberta1, User:Cuegulfenburg, User:Knowadelas, User:TrojanWarriors, and their newest iteration, User:Jerusalem, ISRAEL. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 20:48, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 20:50, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP sock of Nangparbat removing cited content and reinstating BLP violations. 2A00:11C0:63:794:0:0:0:7 (talk) 17:14, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:24, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Seems to be the same person with different IP, same disruptive overlinking. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:79.33.99.182#July_2016_2. Mlpearc Phone (open channel) 18:03, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:20, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: vandalism page repeatedly recreated; no possibility of legitimate page. GSMR (talk) 19:54, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected BethNaught (talk) 19:57, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – I won't be surprised if my request will be declined again. You're letting vandalism persist in this article. Sixth of March 06:28, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 14:01, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It continues. Vandalism all over the place. Kante4 (talk) 07:45, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 13:59, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Requesting full page protection due to this page being repeatedly created. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:57, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected ~ Rob13Talk 18:08, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Per decision at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 Wimbledon Championships. Music1201 talk 04:29, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Nakon 04:30, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Pending changes protection is not enough. Please protect it after removing the vandalism. The person is not a YouTuber, spouse = Ashiq Hussain (2008-2010), born in Dera Ghazi Khan, died in Multan in a house. This is sourced and accepted content Please make sure it is not changed before protecting the page. 175.110.48.234 (talk) 10:08, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree many IPs are engaged in vandalism and inserting false information. --Rainbow Archer (talk) 10:52, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There's lot of disruptive edits by IP users on an article of a person who died recently. The pending changes backlog keeps on increasing and it is difficult for pending changes reviewers to determine whether to accept or revert the revision. I suggest to increase the page protections from pending changes to semi-protect temporally. Ayub407talk 11:04, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This looks like PC2 protection but defintiely there's a lot of edits are awaiting review. KGirlTrucker81 talk what I'm been doing 12:06, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Thryduulf. Katietalk 13:54, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. TwoTwoHello (talk) 10:50, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator CIreland. Katietalk 13:54, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent LTA vandal Hypocritepedia (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) continuing to post sensitive personal information about the subject using a variety of IP means to do so (diffs are available for those who have access to oversighted diffs). Nate (chatter) 11:37, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 13:52, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated IP hopping sock vandals. BilCat (talk) 02:15, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done 30/500 protection. NeilN talk to me 04:09, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Own userspace. Babymissfortune 03:12, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 04:04, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – New accounts (created just for this) and IPs edit warring over POV changes, after recent news coverage. Worth protecting until it dies down. JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 04:59, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Any administrator is welcome to alter the duration as they see fit if there is discussion on the talk page. ~ Rob13Talk 05:06, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – BLP vios. Yellow Dingo (talk) 21:25, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. ~ Rob13Talk 22:51, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – User continues to re-add content that was removed as a potential NPOV violation. Project users are attempting to gain consensus on what to do. CrashUnderride 22:38, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Rob13Talk 23:15, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Editor created a duplicate article to Curaçao general election, 2016 at this title and refuses to accept it being redirected to the existing one (please ensure it's in the redirect form when protecting as this is being repeatedly reverted). Also issues around WP:COI and repeatedly adding vandalism warnings to my userpage (see their talk page for more details). Number 57 22:58, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. I've given a final warning to the user to knock it out. ~ Rob13Talk 23:19, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same as before. Three months didn't stop it. Requesting long term protection. Majora (talk) 02:56, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done by GorillaWarfare --Majora (talk) 03:14, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: The page describes very serious actions. 95.49.103.154 (talk) 20:04, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. There doesn't appear to be any unusual disruption on that policy page warranting protection. ~ Rob13Talk 20:23, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Protection: Several users severely violating WP:NOTNEWS Jeppiz (talk) 21:01, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Not an all-out edit war, just a few disagreements here and there. Try discussing on the talk page MusikAnimal talk 21:16, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated addition of incorrect information. There is some ongoing student dispute in the institution apparently (see talk) . Aloneinthewild (talk) 21:01, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MusikAnimal talk 21:14, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 23:59, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:22, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. nableezy - 00:29, 16 July 2016 (UTC) 00:29, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:13, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. nableezy - 00:32, 16 July 2016 (UTC) 00:32, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done NeilN talk to me 01:14, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. nableezy - 00:32, 16 July 2016 (UTC) 00:32, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done NeilN talk to me 01:16, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Deli nk (talk) 00:45, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:17, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Deli nk (talk) 00:50, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:19, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP introducing original research and POV pushing the past few days. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:42, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also blocked a large range that appears to have been making similar edits across many law enforcement articles for months. ~ Rob13Talk 23:00, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protect or block the IPs, you decide: High level of Harry Styles fangirls. Glitchygirl (talk) 22:05, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 23:06, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated addition of unsourced and biased information spanning several months, very possibly for more than a year, particularly under the Personal life section. Attempts to dissuade this nuisance through notes and warnings have been constantly ignored. - Hermittons (talk) 22:14, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not enough recent disruption to warrant semi-protection, although there does appear to be long-term instability. Let's try pending changes for a month and see how that goes. ~ Rob13Talk 23:12, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Mlpearc (open channel) 23:05, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 23:22, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Target for infrequent addition of red-linked publications. . Sam Sailor Talk! 14:03, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Rob13Talk 18:34, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Player is the subject of strong transfer speculation and is receiving a large amount of unsourced and premature changes from IP users. Kosack (talk) 19:36, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 20:11, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Should we start with PC and see how it goes?. Sam Sailor Talk! 20:32, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Page is target of constant vandalism and is a notable current event. Could this be upgraded to Temporary semi-protection? Cbrittain10 (talk|contribs) 21:02, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I second temporary semi-protection from IP addresses. JC · Talk · Contributions 21:04, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — foxj 21:11, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

17 July 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. EvergreenFir (talk) 03:16, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Katietalk 11:30, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Copyright violations. Snuggums (talk / edits) 16:02, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined File deleted instead. ~ Rob13Talk 16:12, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Constant addition of unreliable citations. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 16:11, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. ~ Rob13Talk 16:13, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – documents a current event. Eric S.V. (talk) 12:58, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Rob13Talk 15:48, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring and persistent section blanking.. -The Herald (Benison)the joy of the LORDmy strength 13:56, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The edit-warring ended 3 days ago. ~ Rob13Talk 15:52, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent unsourced content by IP contributors, unresponsive to requests to stop or read policies on original research and referencing. Dubbinu | t | c 14:14, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. ~ Rob13Talk 15:53, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Constant BLP violations and unsourced content + IP hopping vandalism. 172.58.40.62 (talk) 18:33, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 18:45, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 23:01, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:28, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 15:47, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 15:57, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. —MRD2014 T C 17:15, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected ~ Rob13Talk 17:29, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism with repetitive update of negative information. Becktea (talk) 08:44, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator KrakatoaKatie. NeilN talk to me 12:48, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 15:40, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 12:50, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing. Please protect for four months until NBA season begins. TM 15:56, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 11:28, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated vandalism by a trio of IP addresses. Lepricavark (talk) 04:19, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 06:24, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism on this article once again, significantly increased as Hillary Clinton's profile rises. Unlikely that this will change, and it is a BLP issue as well as a major time sink for editors. Thanks. Tvoz/talk 06:30, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected ~ Rob13Talk 06:39, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Semi-protected two years ago and there has been little vandalism since. Lower down to PC for now and if there still isn't any vandalism, protectioned might be able to be removed entirely. Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:30, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Paging EdJohnston to aisle 3. Katietalk 13:53, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There've been lots of nationalist problems with this article in the past. (See the talk page and the archives). People dispute about the history of Bulgaria and the Turkish connection. A neighboring country, Macedonia, is also indefinitely semiprotected. In my opinion, PC is not of much use against long-term POV pushing, it is more for drive-by vandalism. So I favor keeping the indefinite semiprotection. EdJohnston (talk) 14:09, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected That's what I was thinking, and Ed confirms. The nationalism from Eastern European POV pushers is worsening, and I see nothing good from unprotecting right now. Katietalk 21:38, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Resumption of IP-hopping sockpuppetry. Ebyabe talk - State of the Union05:29, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 05:37, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

fully protected: High level of IP vandalism every time semi-protection expires. Content is repeatedly deleted and unsourced content is added in its place: The replaced content contradicts verified sources and other material in the article. Miimno (talk) 06:04, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 06:10, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Reverts and personal attacks by IPs. They have little history so are flying by to just attack and must be able to change IPs frequently. These are my User and Talk pages. I prefer to deal with people that have some possibility of being held responsible for their actions, no IPs. Thanx. Poodleboy (talk) 07:27, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected the user page. The user talk page vandalism isn't severe enough to need protection at the moment. ~ Rob13Talk 07:42, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ Rob13Talk 07:57, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:09, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Katietalk 21:36, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP's keep adding non-notables to the article. Sro23 (talk) 01:08, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:11, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term semi-protection: Subject of SPI continually vandalizing the page through IPs on a long-term basis. Nate (chatter) 04:51, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 05:22, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Very similiar vandalism by 2601:87:4101:5733:F0CC:A895:5784:C479, User:Steve Slasher! and User:SlipBop. User name seems to change after issuing warning(s). Ilyushka88 | Talk! Contribs 19:44, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. We've tried escalating semi-protections and even pending changes for a time. This disruption began within hours of the expiration of a year-long semi-protection. I will not tolerate BLP violations like this, particularly married with socking. Katietalk 21:36, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 20:20, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 23:40, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism going on for many many months. Unlikely to stop any time soon. 6 months or a year of semi protection would be good. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:40, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 23:49, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

18 July 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Two-three weeks before petitioning period is over in most states. Persistent addition of untrue and poorly sourced information by multiple IPs. TM 16:34, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:28, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. MYS77 16:40, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 17:18, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protection: has been recreated as vandalism numerous times over the past decade. GSMR (talk) 17:23, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected--Ymblanter (talk) 18:26, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent ongoing IP vandalism to add a non-existent Pinocchio ride. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 15:26, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected ~ Rob13Talk 16:37, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Disruption by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hypocritepedia. clpo13(talk) 15:37, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:54, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP editor repeatedly inserting incorrect information. oknazevad (talk) 16:18, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 17:16, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Not exactly sockpuppetry, more like IP jumping. Dat GuyTalkContribs 11:15, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined You filed at AN3 first, so let's have that play out. No posting at multiple noticeboards, particularly since this was fully protected by Ritchie333 last week. Katietalk 11:27, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – I've been watching this article and basically every edit is either blatant vandalism or gross BLP violations since the last protection expired on June 21st. -- LuK3 (Talk) 15:03, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected ~ Rob13Talk 15:21, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 15:04, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:16, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Addition of unsourced content from dynamic IP. Qed237 (talk) 10:12, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:42, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
.. Locked because of the wrong reasons.94.234.170.3 (talk) 12:45, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated removal of referenced text from IP address, claiming to be the subject's manager. The editor claims to be working on the instruction of the subject who doesn't want some of the text to be "revealed", but all the text that has been removed is fully referenced from published articles. 78.145.191.66 (talk) 11:26, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 11:33, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. This is mainly connected to the events immediately after the 2016 Scottish Cup Final. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 12:33, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 14:13, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:38, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Katietalk 14:16, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full-protection: Persistent vandalism despite semi-protection, due to a recent feud between celebrities. Younotmenotyou (talk) 08:17, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Confirming I got it. Thanks for the note. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 09:05, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Has been protected a huge number of times in the past . Omni Flames (talk) 09:52, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Indef PC. NeilN talk to me 09:58, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 10:08, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:39, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 10:09, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:44, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dat GuyTalkContribs 10:45, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 10:46, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IP and new registered contributors. -- dsprc [talk] 20:51, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Rob13Talk 03:09, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection or Pending changes protection: There have been many attempts to blank (remove) the "DRIV3Rgate" section. 74.134.85.87 (talk) 00:03, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Rob13Talk 00:30, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism to this biography article, due to the subject being involved in a recent controversy regarding a political statement made on television today. -- Whats new?(talk) 06:09, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 72 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –Darkwind (talk) 08:12, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – repeated insertion of hoax information by IP socks. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 17:10, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Given the circumstances I think semi has a better chance of fending off the persistent abuser, so trying it over PC MusikAnimal talk 04:11, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Ever since this page got unprotected, there have been too many disruptive edits from IP users. Nickag989 (talk) 19:40, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Extensive history of disruption MusikAnimal talk 04:15, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Users don't target this page very often, but when they do, it's almost always spam or some kind of vandalism. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 00:39, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 04:05, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Expected high level of IP vandalism as he is about to win the 2016 Open Championship. Mórtas is Dóchas (talk) 17:29, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. ~ Rob13Talk 22:59, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. ―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 22:45, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. ~ Rob13Talk 22:59, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. GreenC 00:56, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 03:09, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Unregged editors, multiple consecutive small edits consisting of minor unsourced BLP changes. . Sam Sailor Talk! 02:59, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 03:08, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Rumours regarding a transfer. Qed237 (talk) 21:05, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 00:41, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Yasi seems to be getting quite a bit of vandalisim atm. Jason Rees (talk) 21:06, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Appears to be long-term abuse. ~ Rob13Talk 00:40, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The page keeps on getting blanked, yet it was reviewed and approved Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Crazyseiko (talk) 21:17, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 00:37, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. MartinZ02 (talk) 21:43, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 00:35, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Seems to be becoming another article of choice for Jasonski every time he makes a new sock account. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 23:46, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 00:31, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism is continuing after the page was recently unprotected. Melonkelon (talk) 00:23, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 00:29, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism - changing info from country infobox constantly. 92slim (talk) 18:46, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Rob13Talk 18:48, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. 2607:FB90:7805:FD1A:0:2D:EFB0:3801 (talk) 21:02, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 22:55, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

TV Shows Considered One of the Bests of All Time

Semi-protection: Many IP users keep on changing critics lists of best television programs of all time to their own personal picks, despite constant warning. It isn't just one IP user, there are multiple new ones that keep on coming and changing them. Joef1234 (talk) 23:15, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. for the first article. Not enough disruption on the second to warrant protection. ~ Rob13Talk 00:33, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ Rob13Talk 00:47, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

19 July 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Semi-protection of this user talk page or a block with removal of talk page access is needed. An editor is using Wikipedia as a webhost. It is the same editor and behavior that led to protection of User talk:75.154.161.210. Gnome de plume (talk) 15:22, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined C.Fred took away talk page access when he blocked. NeilN talk to me 16:45, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Everymorning (talk) 17:08, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. It's been created once in the last four years, and that was in 2015. I'm not seeing anything justifying protection here. ‑ Iridescent 17:14, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sro23 (talk) 19:40, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by Widr. -- SA 13 Bro (talk) 19:50, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Could we protect this? Season is over so should never change and it is only vandalised anyway. Qed237 (talk) 17:50, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Yamaguchi先生.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:15, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: persistent vandalism and/or unsourced additions. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 18:01, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:18, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and BLP violations. 172.56.39.138 (talk) 18:30, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chronic but not overwhelming vandalism, so let's give PC1 a try. Thanks for reporting. Airplaneman 18:58, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: persistent vandalism and BLP violations. Nearly every edit for the past I'd say year has been either vandalism or reverting vandalism. Currently pending changes, but in my opinion semi protection would be more appropriate and help reduce the amount of unnecessary work. Sro23 (talk) 12:51, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined One edit in the last ten days does not require semi-protection. Pending changes is working fine. Katietalk 13:15, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of recent BLP vandalism from IPs. Gnome de plume (talk) 15:16, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator BU Edgar181. NeilN talk to me 16:43, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reduce protection: Please reduce the protection to semi like sister template {{album chart}}. Experienced users and non-sysops like me who maintain the charts have to always go through edit requests. And the vandalism for which it was protected was not even that severe and I have this template watchlisted to prevent any vandal. —IB [ Poke ] 12:22, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

{{album chart}} has around 6,500 transclusions whereas {{single chart}} has nearer to 16,000, not including transclusions from the recent template renames which'd double the transclusion count for each. tutterMouse (talk) 13:02, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Can't do it for a template with 15,787 transclusions. That's the definition of highly visible template. Katietalk 13:12, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2607:FB90:7805:FD1A:0:2D:EFB0:3801 (talk) 06:43, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) IP, this may be better suited to the edit warring noticeboard, as it only appears to be a dispute between an IP and one other editor -- samtar talk or stalk 11:02, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There hasn't been any vandalism there since late April. If you're referring to the content dispute between you and another editor, that's not vandalism, and even if it was, semi-protection wouldn't help as the user is autoconfirmed. Omni Flames (talk) 11:19, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. NeilN talk to me 11:53, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent Disruptive Editing that may also be considered BLP violations. Page was previously semi-protected for BLP policy violations. Dane2007 (talk) 08:16, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. While there was a kerfuffle yesterday, in the past 24 hours things have died down a bit. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:52, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit-warring and possible sockpuppetry. A ridiculous claim of there being 10 million Croats living in Turkey (see talk page) was posted by a registered editor, but was quickly reverted, followed by further re-additions and reverts (being reverted by multiple editors), with the re-additions now being made by an IP-hopper in Croatia, claiming, among other things, that only Croats can edit the article.... Thomas.W talk 15:03, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Registered editor warned. NeilN talk to me 15:09, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – One glance at the page's history tells me there's vandalism or disruptive editing going on. It should be noted that this page is the subject of a possibly related discussion at ANI. Gestrid (talk) 05:41, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The activity has died down a bit in the last day or so. @Thomas.W:, if you get any more grief from this article, ping me and I'll semi-protect it. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:56, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Once again the dynamic IP 88.236 has returned. Qed237 (talk) 09:11, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:36, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism since mid-June. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 14:18, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @FoCuSandLeArN: The article has never been protected and the disruption is recent. Indefinite protection is overkill right now. NeilN talk to me 15:02, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Page-move vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 14:26, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 15:03, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 14:29, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator GB fan. NeilN talk to me 14:55, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 14:45, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:57, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism.   Aloha27  talk  14:47, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:53, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP vandalism. IP user 108.31.142.94 (also using 66.26.242.251) has done it again! 108.31.142.94 continues to remove user DJMickeDC's added content. After several undos, it is apparent it will not stop. Micke (talk)

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. ~ Rob13Talk 03:25, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, artist roster changes by different IPs (Can we get something longer than a week please, it's the 4th time this year due to young fans editing the page tyty) - Valkyrino (talk) 09:41, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 13:24, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 11:32, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 13:21, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP hopper keeps removing the AfD banner, while the article is still at AfD. I suggest a semi until at least after the AfD, so 23 July for starters? HyperGaruda (talk) 08:01, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 13:09, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: persistent violations of WP:BLP mixed with blatant vandalism. IgnorantArmies (talk) 12:19, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 13:18, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: persistent vandalism, racist comments and BLP violations. 73.159.24.89 (talk) 13:05, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 13:10, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Addition of unsourced content by 83.250.204.141 (talk · contribs) and 83.250.25.39 (talk · contribs), with the latter edit warring and reverting other users' edits. . SLBedit (talk) 22:40, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. I've provided the WP:3RR notice to the only IP actively editing the article, and he can be reported if he reverts again. ~ Rob13Talk 23:44, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page used to be semi-protected indefinitely. After five years of that, I thought the vandalism would've died down, but it hasn't. There has been no response from Elockid, the protecting/ unprotecting admin, regarding reprotecting the page, so I'm requesting it here. Gestrid (talk) 06:22, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:57, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There seems to be at least two disputes about the content of this article between IP users resulting in edit wars. 331dot (talk) 11:53, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 11:56, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Italia2006 (talk · contribs), who has been reported at ANI, is edit warring and violated WP:3RR. SLBedit (talk) 22:05, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The dispute can be resolved at one of the two other venues it was reported at MusikAnimal talk 23:51, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry of User:Glitter1959. 172.58.40.241 (talk) 00:43, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 01:13, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
User's at it again with another IP. They'll clearly just move on to another IP after this one is blocked. Protection is necessary.Crboyer (talk) 06:31, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Lord Roem.. For information, this particular vandal is acrive for years in a number of articles. They do not respond to any external perturbation, change IP immediately when block, and edit very fast. Any page they touch is best immediately protected, blocks do not help.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:37, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent childish vandalism.Crboyer (talk) 05:00, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 05:04, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Though move attempts have not happened yet, users have been adding team names to the article, though no team name has been announced yet. Preemptive move protection would be helpful to prevent premature page moves. BilCat (talk) 20:25, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. ~ Rob13Talk 21:21, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Return of IP hopping sockpuppet vandal. See also J. J. Abrams, Bruce Willis and Paige O'Hara. Ebyabe talk - Inspector General22:07, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Feel free to report again if he returns on another IP, but he's only used one so far. ~ Rob13Talk 23:46, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit-warring IPs. Dr. K. 01:15, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Bbb23. NeilN talk to me 01:22, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued disruption from IP users in the range 107.77.232.0/21, who also vandalized the article repeatedly on July 7. MPFitz1968 (talk) 22:01, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 23:39, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 23:10, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 23:54, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Dan56 (talk) 00:38, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 6 months NeilN talk to me 01:11, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry of User:Glitter1959. 172.58.40.241 (talk) 00:43, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 01:12, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of disruptive edits by IPs, starts again after being unprotected. '''tAD''' (talk) 00:58, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:07, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Very short and temporary protection from disruptive dynamic IP who has now had latest IP blocked. Qed237 (talk) 14:21, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Talk pages are rarely declined, as other editors may need them. If the IP swaps, we'll try a rangeblock, or if not, block again. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:55, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. clpo13(talk) 22:57, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator MelanieN. for a period of two days. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (Complaints|Mistakes) 23:19, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect link update to point to Wikipedia:Don't be a dick. This includes a {{Historical}} tag asking people to avoid using this term, and a link to its deprecation discussion (at meta). This will be consistent with the treatment of WP:DIVA and Wikipedia:Don't feed the divas. Making the request here since WP:DICK does not have its own talk page, and I don't want people to confuse this with making changes to WP:DBAJ and Wikipedia:Don't be a jerk, which have not been deprecated (just as WP:DIVA's replacement page, Wikipedia:Don't be high maintenance, has not been). PS: After the link fix, the WP:DICK shortcut should be removed from Wikipedia:Don't be a jerk. Already took care of all this for the WP:DBAD shortcut. WP:JERK is unaffected, and goes to a humor page which also links to meta:Don't be a jerk just like the rest of these do more directly via soft redirs.  — SMcCandlish ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ʌ≼  20:38, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is okay, but one could argue "dick" is a bit more offensive than "diva" and perhaps doesn't deserve the same treatment. E.g. I click on WP:DICK and I don't see more dick, I see "jerk" MusikAnimal talk 04:24, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If we're going to tell people to stop using that term, then this shortcut should go to a page telling them to stop using that term. But that's me. Katietalk 11:35, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Works for me, Done MusikAnimal talk 21:55, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

20 July 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Deli nk (talk) 17:42, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:28, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 18:23, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 20:12, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.58.40.117 (talk) 18:53, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 20:13, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Might consider asking for long term semi. EvergreenFir (talk) 19:07, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 1 year. NeilN talk to me 20:09, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of rumours regarding this BLP. Qed237 (talk) 20:02, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 20:22, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – page being targeted by IP socks of The UPN Vandal. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 15:43, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:17, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – page being targeted by IP socks of The UPN Vandal. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 15:45, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:18, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – page being targeted by IP socks of The UPN Vandal. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 15:46, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:21, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. clpo13(talk) 18:07, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 18:14, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent and increasingly frequent vandalism, including violent and racially charged edits. Safehaven86 (talk) 15:02, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 15:36, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Rainbow Archer (talk) 16:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:09, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Sro23 (talk) 16:45, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:56, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP user vandalism. They continue to re-order the language order because they want their own native language to be first. This is linguistic nationalism and it's gone on for too long, the original ordering of the languages is in alphabetical order. 124.180.140.68 (talk) 02:39, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 02:44, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Lord Roem: It's hard to warn the user appropriately because their IP address constantly changes. (121.214.14.118 (talk) 04:24, 20 July 2016 (UTC))[reply]
There doesn't appear to be any consistent recent history of this on any kind of continuous basis. AIV is the best place to handle this unless there's more disruption. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 06:55, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Lord Roem: It happened two days ago by this IP address, 117.197.22.64. (121.214.14.118 (talk) 09:31, 20 July 2016 (UTC))[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Extreme vandalism to this page, concerning the on-going changes to the judging panel and the infobox. Plus, addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content within the article. livelikemusic talk! 13:09, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:08, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Rainbow Archer (talk) 13:19, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:04, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 13:30, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA, hoaxing. See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Kenny Loggins vandal. Binksternet (talk) 12:09, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 12:18, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Has been recent target of IPs genre warring on the article, against a sourced genre. —IB [ Poke ] 12:13, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 12:21, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 12:46, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 13:09, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject[...]. Darklight Shadows 04:07, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 04:12, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: High level of IP vandalism. Some edits have contained unciteable information and defamatory information. Some editors linked thru COI against topic entity/individual. Accusation of COI to justify redirection of entire article and deletion/rewording (to be more subjectively negative) information. Page is of highly notable individual. Recent112383 (talk) 06:11, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: There has been long term Conflict of Interest editing on this article. This user account Recent112383 btw is an SPA being used to return article to a state of puffery. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:23, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, filer blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:42, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Omni Flames (talk) 06:58, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, it is indeed vandalized daily, but there are enough watchers to revert vandalism, there is no particular attack now, and it is important that Ips and new users who have no clue how Wikipedia works could post there.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:40, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Consistent removal of content in violation of WP:SPOILER - see article history for this. Alex|The|Whovian? 02:02, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. This should be dealt with on a per-user basis, no current need to protect the article IMO. --Lord Roem ~ (talk) 02:34, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.58.41.102 (talk) 03:04, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 03:38, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Dynamic IP keeps changing the punctuation style, despite being told this goes against the MOS. Random86 (talk) 03:30, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 06:09, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from IP-hopper. As soon as one IP gets blocked, they'll move to another one, which is why the page needs to be protected. Crboyer (talk) 23:53, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 2601:647:4780:1e70::/64 blocked by NrDg NeilN talk to me 00:33, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IPv6 edit warring. Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 2601:647:4780:1e70::/64 blocked by NrDg NeilN talk to me 00:30, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IPv6 edit warring - or consider a /64 range block. Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:10, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 2601:647:4780:1e70::/64 blocked by another admin NeilN talk to me 00:28, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.58.41.102 (talk) 03:38, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 04:01, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – User vandalizing their talk page after indef block. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:26, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Floquenbeam has taken care of it. TimothyJosephWood 19:41, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Swarm 23:39, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Mass reversions from IP and new editors, removing required coding from article that is used in other articles, etc. Alex|The|Whovian? 00:52, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) There seems to be only one current active IP, and the other user is auto-confirmed. 172.56.42.98 (talk) 01:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 01:43, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. LG-Gunther :  Talk  03:42, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 03:45, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.56.42.98 (talk) 23:49, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:39, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JC · Talk · Contributions 00:42, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:52, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JC · Talk · Contributions 01:13, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 01:16, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Page-move vandalism – Page-move vandalism. Page moved from Diego to I'm Gonna Beat The Crap Out of You, which is not a good title. Ssjhowarthisawesome (talk) 23:34, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected indefinitely. Swarm 23:38, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vandalism goes back for several years. 172.56.42.98 (talk) 23:53, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:36, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.56.42.98 (talk) 23:55, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:32, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As long a Semi as possible Page history is entirely, or is nearly entirely vandalism and reversion. TimothyJosephWood 21:50, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 23:25, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: IP vandalism and BLP violations on politician's page. Meters (talk) 21:56, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 23:25, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Disruption, likely by Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/The UPN Vandal. clpo13(talk) 22:17, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 23:28, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite-protection: Multiple vandalism editions by unregistered and registered users/persistent vandalism.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 22:19, July 19, 2016 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:22, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • However the case has already change, the page is currently suffering of still persistent multiple vandalism editions. Back then was something right now the page is still being vandalized, so please we need some real help here.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 22:24, July 19, 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 23:29, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Because people continue not to be able to discern the difference between him and Crowley. Ebyabe talk - Opposites Attract22:23, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 23:31, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – With UEFA Europa League protected from this dynamic IP vandal, he now started at Champions League. Qed237 (talk) 22:25, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 23:31, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.58.40.153 (talk) 22:27, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 23:33, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Pending changes is not working well here... 172.58.40.153 (talk) 22:40, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Already protected by admin Materialscientist. 172.56.42.98 (talk) 23:24, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 23:34, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. 172.56.42.98 (talk) 23:08, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 23:35, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Omni Flames (talk) 23:27, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 23:35, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.56.42.98 (talk) 23:32, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 23:36, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection: After the full protect was lifted, IPs and new editors back to edit warring. LibStar (talk) 12:09, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Katietalk 13:20, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – New WP:SPA user is constantly reverting the anti-vandalism bot, has been making ad-hominem insults on his talk page as well, when I adressed the problem to him. - LouisAragon (talk) 21:04, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And now they are socking with a new account after I gave the first one a final warning. Sro23 (talk) 21:18, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 23:09, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP violations by dynamic IPs. Dr. K. 21:05, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 23:11, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – The head of Fox News is allegedly about to sign the papers ending his tenure there, with a $40+ million golden parachute. Nothing is confirmed, so BLP violations abound. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:18, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 23:13, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. 172.58.47.37 (talk) 21:34, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 23:16, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:34, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 23:18, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. This is an extremely controversial topic among football fans and needs obvious protection to restrict IP users from changing information to favor their player. De88 (talk) 21:44, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 23:20, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism and high likelihood of further disruptive or agenda-driven editing. The subject is involved in an unusually acrimonious party election until 21 September this year (his opponent is already semi protected). Suggested by others on talk page Dtellett (talk) 21:45, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 23:22, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Snuggums (talk / edits) 19:57, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 23:02, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The subject of the article wrote a rather inflammatory tweet about a speaker at the RNC last night. There's been a number of BLP violations today since the comment was made. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:39, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 23:05, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism . Joeykai (talk) 20:40, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 23:06, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Not only is there potentially libelous vandalism based on the current event (RNC), there have been several instances of vandalism over time by unregistered users, including removing all references. JarmihiGOCE (talk) 20:53, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 23:07, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

21 July 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by IP editors over a recent event. 1 week should probably take care of most of it. Niteshift36 (talk) 18:45, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- zzuuzz (talk) 19:34, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated IP vandalism. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:50, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 21:42, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated IP Vandalism. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:51, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 21:43, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term (not necessarily indefinite) full-protection: Constant edit warring/content dispute issues. Normally, I would report this to WP:3RR or the conflict resolution noticeboard, but there are multiple users and IP's alike that have long-passed 3RR and if you go back through the edit history, this type of behavior has lasted since early 2015! Yikes! 172.58.41.52 (talk) 04:20, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined WP:3RR is more than three reverts in 24 hours. Edit warring is sporadic. Have left COI notices on IP talk pages. NeilN talk to me 12:20, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary template protection: Highly visible template – I am getting an overwhelming flood while I sit on the train. I would like a two hour protection to temporarily limit the incoming messages, as I can't really do much on a train. —cyberpowerChat:Online 14:07, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Nowhere in the protection policy does it say we can protect user talk pages with template protection. There's no vandalism to your talk page and these are good faith edits. Katietalk 14:25, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
And they're also disrupting my inbox.—cyberpowerChat:Online 14:27, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) Katie: I think Cyberpower678 may have meant to choose a different protection - that being said I agree there's no vandalism going on.. CP678: may be worth turning off emails for the time being? -- samtar talk or stalk 14:32, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
cyberpower may want to put a note on User talk:Cyberpower678/Editnotice that complaints can currently not be actioned on... Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:39, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I put a notice on the talk page of InternetArchiveBot, which is most likely the source of all the people coming tonmy page.—cyberpowerChat:Online 14:41, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection or pending changes. Repeated BLP violations by unregistered editors. Note: recently had full protection following edit warring, the problems continued 3 hours after the week-long protection expired. MPS1992 (talk) 16:51, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:28, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – And the disruption continues. See article history. These shorter protections don't appear to be doing anything. Amaury (talk | contribs) 17:26, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:37, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Rainbow Archer (talk) 08:38, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- GB fan 11:08, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs keep removing the AfD template. nyuszika7h (talk) 10:49, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- GB fan 11:07, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Regards, James (talk/contribs) 15:36, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 15:44, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP user vandalism. They continue to re-order the language order because they want their own native language to be first. This is linguistic nationalism and it's gone on for too long, the original ordering of the languages is in alphabetical order. I tried protecting it yesterday but it was declined. I can't properly warn the vandal because their IP address constantly changes. The IP vandalised only three days ago. A registered user at the start of the year tried warning a registered user who originally was doing the same thing to stop, it failed at first but they eventually stopped a few months ago, now a dynamic IP user has begun to do the same thing. (58.164.104.111 (talk) 01:18, 21 July 2016 (UTC))[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 14:41, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. ~~

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:07, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full Protection: The same IP vandal came back again and is putting on North Korea, China and other communist country on the page's infobox. It's hard to keep an eye on this if he persists on vandalizing the page forever. Ominae (talk) 13:32, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 13:46, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.58.40.117 (talk) 01:14, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 12:00, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Having some trouble keeping simple templates (like BDA) in the entry. Being deleted by dynamic IPs. EricEnfermero (Talk) 01:55, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 2406:e006:4bc:1::/64 blocked NeilN talk to me 04:04, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page's history is a hub of disruptive edits & vandalism. IPs and few inexperienced new users update the Gross of films on their own will without providing a suitable reference that proves it. There isn't any constructive edits by IP's or new users that could discourage me from page protection request. This page was protected for limited time but I think that was not enough. Here's history revision with most reverts and major reverts. Tired of reverting edits I'm requesting now to please semi-protect this page for Indefinite period so that only experienced users having some sense about films could add/remove/modify content on this page. Thanks!. Umais Bin Sajjad (talk) 04:38, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 12:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sock puppetry. BilCat (talk) 05:20, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 12:33, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – POV edits changing the name from commonwealth to colony. clpo13(talk) 19:15, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. NeilN talk to me 20:19, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

permanent protection: Extremely high level of IP vandalism. Emiwee20 (talk) 21:09, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 21:17, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 23:42, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. @Qed237: It appears that those introducing his first appearance are perfectly correct. See here. It certainly isn't vandalism. ~ Rob13Talk 00:08, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@BU Rob13: As the infobox states at the bottom, Senior club appearances and goals counted for the domestic league only... (my bold) and the cap was definately not ... correct as of 12:24, 16 May 2016 (UTC). Also this is unsourced info to a BLP, but I trust your judgement. Qed237 (talk) 02:17, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
None of that is "persistent vandalism", though. I don't think protection is appropriate based on a few good-faith edits tied to a specific event that has already ended. It's unlikely to be preventative since interest in the match is already on the decline. ~ Rob13Talk 03:24, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dynamic IP vandal. Dr. K. 06:39, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, since it seems this hasn't been done on this article before, how's a week? If it resumes after that, we can try a longer period; sound okay? Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 06:54, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple editors removing sourced content repeatedly, often without explanation. Recommend semi-protection for at least 48 hours. GoneIn60 (talk) 21:09, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. There's only been one recent IP which removed that information. ~ Rob13Talk 00:16, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: This article represents a controversial subject, and should be pending-changes protected, in order to help prevent vandalism. Ethanlu121 (talk) 00:53, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Katietalk 01:13, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Article represents an extremely controversial subject, and pending-changes protection would significantly reduce vandalism. Ethanlu121 (talk) 00:56, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 01:12, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated blanking/whitewashing of sourced information by IPs/socks. --Finngall talk 07:04, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Lord Roem for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Omni Flames (talk) 11:21, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Long-term IP vandalism. Have been little to no positive IP contributions. 172.58.40.117 (talk) 23:19, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 00:14, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 02:32, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Swarm. NeilN talk to me 04:05, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – The same user has created this page twice to try to promote their own business. . Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 03:21, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. NeilN talk to me 04:00, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP user vandalism, constantly changing IPs. Several IP user addresses repeatedly adding Justin Bieber as one of the voice actors whereas Justin Timberlake is the correct actor. Donner60 (talk) 03:54, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 03:59, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Several users keep removing sourced content from Sino-Soviet border conflict and replacing them with unsourced content, or content sourced to unreliable sourced; this is all despite being told not to. JudgeRM (talk to me) 17:29, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.. MelanieN (talk) 19:27, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and addition of unsourced content about trending topic. --Another Believer (Talk) 19:16, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only a single problematic edit made by a non-autoconfirmed user. ~ Rob13Talk 19:55, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP vandals persistently inserting memes into page as tribute to VideoGameDunkey (a YouTube user). In a video that's probably more popular than the game itself, he referred to the game as "Bubberducky" and gave a deliberately ridiculous description. The vandals have been re-posting that name and description in place of the article's content. As funny as the video was, it's encouraging a lot of walk-in vandals. Jergling (talk) 21:43, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 00:10, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – page being targeted by IP socks of The UPN Vandal. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 15:46, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 19:19, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Multiple vandalism editions by unregistered users/persistent addition of still not necessary information for the article.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 20:07, July 20, 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 21:16, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:18, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 21:27, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

22 July 2016

Full protection: persistent and bad faith violations of NPOV by a registered user, who has ignored warnings. Richard75 (talk) 16:25, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 16:43, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. GreenC 20:29, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 20:38, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Highly visible page – There seems to be a possible move war between the title being discussed at WP:ITN/C and one with the word "terrorist" added. We don't generally use that word even in article where the nature of the attack is known. This is developing and with motives unknown, and the move war is unhelpful. LjL (talk) 20:50, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator zzuuzz. NeilN talk to me 21:04, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism from unregistered IP users. Reverted to sourced content after I restored the page. Thanks. Ppt1973 (talk) 18:14, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Looks like it's quietened down. NeilN talk to me 15:48, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – At this point, I would genuinely consider protecting this article until September 21 (the date of the season finale). A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 03:50, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism has continued over the past night. Please protect the article ASAP. --A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 16:17, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 19:36, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalized a lot. ProgrammingGeek (Page!Talk!Contribs!) 09:03, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 15:43, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – User ‎71.98.192.101 has been continually using this page for test edits. . Killer Moff (talk) 14:47, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. NeilN talk to me 15:39, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism magnet for IPS. The Banner talk 19:10, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 19:45, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandlism / BLP violations. 172.58.40.224 (talk) 15:15, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Edgar181. for 6 months. Airplaneman 19:30, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Rainbow Archer (talk) 16:17, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 19:33, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. clpo13(talk) 18:04, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:10, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – A dispute is ongoing and lots of disputes is anticipated. Request full protection. Mr. Nair Talk 09:38, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Not seeing enough edit-warring to justify full protection. ~ Rob13Talk 13:18, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: There was an incident yesterday that has led to an excessive amount of editing including vandalism. This guy is politically adversarial. There is significance to the incident but this will need to get sorted out with legitimate sources, not the chaotic posts of the last 24 day. Echoing another request made at the page Trackinfo (talk) 16:39, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator BU Rob13. NeilN talk to me 16:41, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatedly created by socks of User:Edits201. Sro23 (talk) 17:03, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected by Drmies. tutterMouse (talk) 17:28, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – An IP editor keeps adding unsourced information to this page, without explaining why. Until the situation is clarified, the page should remain a redirect. Slashme (talk) 07:57, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:46, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – BLP vandalism, unsourced additions. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:30, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:41, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism due to recent news events. -- LuK3 (Talk) 15:55, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:10, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Besides the usual vandalism there's also an IP (46. ... usually) with a strange fixation on the article, his edits are often non-harmful but he also all too often makes edits like these where he removes one letter from a title and then puts it back. This has been going on for months now (december last year) and it drives me up the wall. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 05:26, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 14:00, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – blocked User:Til Eulenspiegel using multiple IPs (1st IP admitted to it). Doug Weller talk 12:09, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 13:11, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by multiple IPs. Coltsfan (talk) 12:54, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 13:16, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Violations of BLP on this page back and forth dating back to 2014. Requesting permanent semi-protection to ensure compliance with BLP policy. Dane2007 (talk) 04:56, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 07:02, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 05:34, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Page deleted. NeilN talk to me 06:56, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Not registered users from 189.166. . inaccurate and harmful information posted for a public personality (artist). 06:29, 22 July 2016 (UTC) Luisaromoc (talk) 06:48, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Luisaromoc, that article is pretty poor and lacking in citations. And where is the "Style" section copied from? NeilN talk to me 07:01, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent BLP violations. Persistent additions of unsourced or poorly sourced content. 172.58.40.174 (talk) 01:39, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Only one edit today added information that was inconsistent with the sources in the infobox, and it was actually added by 172.58.40.174. Jones is widely sourced at 6'9" rather than 7'0". EricEnfermero (Talk) 01:53, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Reply: I was mainly looking at the long-term history when making this request. 172.58.40.174 (talk) 02:16, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 02:41, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent BLP violations. Persistent additions of unsourced or poorly sourced content. 172.58.40.174 (talk) 01:42, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There were a couple good-faith edits that were reverted and then a single user editing disruptively. Try WP:AIV if that one user continues. ~ Rob13Talk 03:02, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Transfer speculation passed off as fact. '''tAD''' (talk) 03:41, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 04:04, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Has been prone to vandalism (such as random removal of the BDA template and various changes to DOB) over the last couple of days by dynamic IPs. Multiple Filipino actors involved, but this is one of the main targets. EricEnfermero (Talk) 05:13, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 07:05, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content by a sock-hopping IP. livelikemusic talk! 23:50, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 03:12, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive editing of IPs of removing sourced info and adding unsourced info. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 23:57, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 03:08, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.58.40.174 (talk) 00:57, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 03:05, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.58.40.174 (talk) 01:33, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 03:04, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term (not necessarily indefinite) full-protection: Constant edit warring/content dispute issues. MrUser200 edit's the page with out discussing it and no external sources. SRich (talk) 16:48, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User SRich and User ZH8000 are reverting sourced edits, "calling on WP Guidelines", however the dont have a reason or criteria for those reverts.Mr.User200 (talk) 17:02, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment)@Mr.User200, SRich, and ZH8000: You should probably try and work this out in the talk page. If that doesn't work, go to the dispute resolution noticeboard. Dat GuyTalkContribs 17:12, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks DatGuy!..Mr.User200 (talk) 17:17, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please come to talk page instead of adding here a unnecessary comment, thank you. SRich (talk) 20:03, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Mr.User200 blocked 24 hours for edit warring. I'm not going to lock the page right now, but SRich and ZH8000 are right at 3RR, so step lightly. Katietalk 21:53, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Under the light of the edits and editing behavior displayed so far by KevinAbdulqader (after ProtectorOfHaq and ZaynfromNY) (Please, see KevinAbdulqader (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log),2001:56a:7230:b00:508e:53d1:e1a9:a05d (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), 2001:56a:7230:b00:445b:84dc:d278:846d (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), 2604:2000:B088:7000:C597:5416:5908:CD47 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) and 50.117.45.69 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)) and the talk history of this article, one can safely determine that this editor is a possible reincarnation of an old and/or blocked editor (possibly Baboon43) as he is removing the same independent, academic and verifiable content from the article which has been "discussed" and "re-discussed" over and over again throughout the history of this article. It is important to note that he suddenly showed up 24 hours ago and made the first edit and with reference to the Talk Page, one can see that I already have had an extensive discussion over the edits recently made with him and still he reverted to the same version to which he originally showed up and created the Wikipedia id for. He is accusing me of belonging to some organization and yet he doesn't name it. Thus, it will be prudent to protect this page on temporarily basis if not on indefinite basis before situation gets out of hand and drive each and every editor who will get involved to reinvent the wheel again. Thank you. McKhan (talk) 18:53, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


I have no opinion on whether the Al-Ahbash page should be be protected. But McKhan please do not characterize my edits as vandalism. You corrected the problems I found with the page by bolstering citations and rewording sentences. I was not engaging in vandalism. -ZaynfromNY —Preceding undated comment added 19:27, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your kind feedback and I am glad that the edits I made were to your satisfaction. I apologize if it came across that I am characterizing your edits as vandalism. However, that isn't the case as I was simply making my point. Thank you. McKhan (talk)
User(s) blocked. Katietalk 21:41, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: High level of IP and new user vandalism because of current events. Most vandalism that would go to Taylor Swift (semi-protected) seems to be going here instead. – FenixFeather (talk)(Contribs) 22:47, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. only 2 vandalism edits today (user blocked), so PC or semi-protection seems like overkill. Will add it to my watchlist as well in case the situation deteriorates. BencherliteTalk 22:52, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant IP vandalism and BLP violations. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:46, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pending changes for three months thereafter. ~ Rob13Talk 02:59, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: The site is in the news, and soon will enter mainstream tech media. The URL has been changed many times, yet no reliable source mentions its move. I've already reverted 3 times, so I can't revert anymore. KAT is the most popular torrent site, TPB-like mirrors and imposters popping up is reasonable and likely. The changes are mostly by anonymous IPs. —Hexafluoride Ping me if you need help, or post on my talk 17:11, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The edit rate is too high for PC – too much of a load for the reviewers. Katietalk 21:48, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Mlpearc (open channel) 17:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. NeilN talk to me 18:31, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Sudden influx of IP editors attempting to change it from "myth" to "theory" in the body text. Jergling (talk) 17:54, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Jergling, it's one IP that no one has talked to yet. NeilN talk to me 18:33, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
NeilN, you're right. Sorry, I wasn't paying close enough attention. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jergling (talkcontribs) 18:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism by multiple IPs, for example pretending that Queen's Park (London) station is underground. David Biddulph (talk) 18:09, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 2a02:c7d:7a06:1000::/64 blocked 2 days for edit warring NeilN talk to me 18:41, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

23 July 2016

Semi-protection: Recent vandalism by an IP User. GUtt01 (talk) 17:23, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 17:35, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Recent vandalism by an IP User. GUtt01 (talk) 17:23, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 17:34, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.--Bozalegenda (talk) 21:43, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 21:49, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Fancruft started the moment the last protection 2 days ago expired. Now pure vandalism going on. —IB [ Poke ] 06:58, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:41, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes protection: (or semi, not sure) Page blanking immediately after previous protection ended. Persistent vandalism, two previous attempts of limited semi-protection have failed. Highly visible target. GermanJoe (talk) 11:50, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 14:03, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandals are back after it was unprotected a few hours before. . Kante4 (talk) 20:39, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 20:45, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ViperSnake151  Talk  04:46, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. NeilN talk to me 05:32, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP vandalism by IPs, evidently IPsocks of an editor who made the exact same BLP violations in the past, leading to a couple of short semiprotections of the page. bonadea contributions talk 15:10, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 6 months. NeilN talk to me 15:15, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.--Bozalegenda (talk) 17:28, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:33, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The last protection was because of sockpuppetry and the edits since are the exact same so I'm assuming it's a sock again although I have no idea who, Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 12:07, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:11, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Neil, –Davey2010Talk 14:18, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Page is prone to vandalism by sockpuppet IP(s). Spartacus! (talk) 12:34, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:15, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High levels of IP vandalism. BattleshipMan (talk) 15:03, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:07, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long term persistent if low level vandalism. -- ferret (talk) 02:21, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:18, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP adding unsourced name change. PC1 is ineffective. KGirlTrucker81 talk what I'm been doing 02:22, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:55, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism, notably today perhaps coinciding with Comic-Con and the IP is continually using different accounts to persist in its vandalism as well as reverting any changes to undo the actions. Subzerosmokerain (talk) 07:54, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:08, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The Filthy Frank people keep trying to promote themselves. Stereorock (talk) 12:55, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I don't know that it'd be something we could indef just yet, but I did give the page a lengthier protection this go-round. If they do it again once the year is up then we can give it an indef protection then. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 13:40, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Every edit to this article over the past year performed by users with IP accounts got reverted as vandalism or a test edit/ mistake. Am requesting temporary protection, though as this article regularly gets over 1,000 views per day, perhaps an indefinite semi-protection would be more appropriate. KDS4444 (talk) 05:14, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 05:29, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editor making bizarre hoax edits on a BLP. We had this same individual (96.28.163.103) doing this to other articles until blocked previously. Please protect until we can get this IP blocked again. Montanabw(talk) 05:21, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 05:28, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistant addition by numerous IPs of unsourced information and vandalism following transfer speculation in the media. Egghead06 (talk) 06:16, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 06:19, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: this recently had a full protect. Now that it's been lifted the single purpose editors are back edit warring. I'd actually go longer protection as this article has been subject to a lot of edit warring by new accounts. LibStar (talk) 16:00, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Right now, things have died down. I warned both users not to edit war. If they resume, blocks will be necessary. ~ Rob13Talk 19:40, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recently created article receiving some IP vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:38, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 00:47, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant removal of spoilers, against WP:SPOILER. Alex|The|Whovian? 03:49, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 05:34, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KGirlTrucker81 talk what I'm been doing 21:07, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 23:39, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sro23 (talk) 01:52, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 01:53, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection: There have always been intermittent IP issues here, but I had to request oversight for a diff because it purported to identify membership of entire families, and that can be very dangerous anywhere in the Middle East, because nobody particularly cares if it's true or not. Therefore, I'd like to prevent IP editing at all to the article, and if someone has something useful to add, they can always use the talk page to request it. MSJapan (talk) 01:56, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 01:58, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Also a current event. Dat GuyTalkContribs 19:10, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not true at all. High profile article attracting a lot of edits. No more poorly sourced content than anywhere else. This request is just an excuse to exclude IPs. There was already an early request NOT to protect this article. It seems to have fallen on deaf ears. Give it chance, for heaven's sake! 31.52.165.204 (talk) 19:59, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Anons are not causing a problem at this time. -- zzuuzz (talk) 20:01, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Zzuuzz and 31.52.165.204: I believe there should be at least PC. See this edit it took me a few seconds to find. Dat GuyTalkContribs 20:26, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I think you'll find PC would be a very poor thing to have on such a busy article. I've noticed as many problems coming from autoconfirmed users as unregistered ones, and a lot of constructive edits from anons. However the need for semi should be kept under review, as it's attracting even more people. -- zzuuzz (talk) 20:32, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, a few seconds. So no real harm done, and no major vandalism to speak of. You know these articles attract new editors. So leave it alone. 31.52.165.204 (talk) 20:33, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Well, looks like it definitely wants move protection. Can this be done? 31.52.165.204 (talk) 20:53, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done by zzuuzz --NeilN talk to me 21:03, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.56.42.142 (talk) 21:51, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 01:39, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LG-Gunther :  Talk  22:05, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 01:40, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LG-Gunther :  Talk  22:24, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 01:40, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Non-notable album that has repeatedly been changed from a redirect to an article back to a redirect in the past. Yeepsi (talk) 22:44, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 01:40, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. This is a viral Internet star whose article is new and is likely to remain vandalism-volatile for some time. Chubbles (talk) 00:32, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:36, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 00:00, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:09, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long term vandalism spanning this whole year. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:03, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:11, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Gross BLP violations and vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:21, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:29, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mr. Nair Talk 17:20, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Talk pages usually aren't protected unless there's severe vandalism or BLP violations. Making faulty edit requests isn't either. ~ Rob13Talk 19:44, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. This is Paul (talk) 22:55, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 23:37, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Protecting admin (Cenarium) does not appear to be active since April; full protection is inappropriate per WP:PREEMPTIVE as there has been no history of vandalism. nyuszika7h (talk) 17:54, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Protection of redirect is fine NeilN talk to me 17:57, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • See WP:Redirect#Redirect protection. Swarm 18:02, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • Ah, thanks, I wasn't aware of that. It's not a big deal, I just didn't know there's an actual policy reason for the protection. (The examples given on that page are more obvious targets for protection, this one might be too, though not as much as those.) I guess they won't really need to be edited often, though I made edit requests to fix the redirect categories, and I thought I'd ask here as I didn't see vandalism, but I was not aware of that section you linked to. nyuszika7h (talk) 18:08, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yeah, protection policy doesn't address redirects at all, and going by that you weren't wrong, but the redirect guideline does allow for the protection of redirects for something as simple as "no reason to edit". Swarm 18:15, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Protecting admin (Cenarium) does not appear to be active since April; full protection is inappropriate per WP:PREEMPTIVE as there has been virtually no history of vandalism. nyuszika7h (talk) 17:54, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Protection of redirect is fine NeilN talk to me 18:00, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

24 July 2016

Indefinite Semi-protection: High level of IP/new user vandalism. This group is controversial and isn't going to stop being controversial any time soon. Of course, there are people who can make sensible and neutral edits to controversial topics, but today alone this page has just been hit by lazy Godwin's Law vandalism and mindless graffiti adding epithets like "fuck puffin" and "wank trumpet". The log is evidence enough to show that this has been going on long enough '''tAD''' (talk) 20:41, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- zzuuzz (talk) 20:51, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent block evasion. User:Monterrosa keeps IP hopping to disrupt the article, previous protection recently expired. Sro23 (talk) 20:50, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. After the expiration of semi-protection, it will be pending changes protected for another six months to allow for assessment of whether the sockpuppetry has stopped. ~ Rob13Talk 21:24, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: IP hopping edit warring to remove sourced material. Refuses to discuss on article talk page and has stated that he will continue to remove the material. [38] [39]. Now at 8 removals by 4 IPs since yesterday. Meters (talk) 20:52, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and most recent IP blocked for edit-warring. ~ Rob13Talk 21:20, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2607:FB90:FD9:7064:0:41:DF4D:8401 (talk) 19:06, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:32, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2607:FB90:FD9:7064:0:41:DF4D:8401 (talk) 19:23, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:30, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism stretching back to early July. -- LuK3 (Talk) 19:34, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:37, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – persistent disruptions by new users. Jamie Tubers (talk) 13:02, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Jamie Tubers, I suggest you look at some uncited text you're reverting back in. NeilN talk to me 14:08, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: People are suggesting on Twitter that this article should be vandalised, because the subject has objected to something in it (which I have now fixed). Sadly, he is encouraging them to do so [40]. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:32, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Missvain. NeilN talk to me 19:22, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2607:FB90:FD9:7064:0:41:DF4D:8401 (talk) 19:06, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:21, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Persistent vandalism. Donnowin1 (talk) 06:22, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not obvious vandalism but still disruptive. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:22, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent content blanking by a single IP. Stylez995 (talk) 08:29, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bishonen | talk 08:46, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent block evasion by User:Til Eulenspiegel. Sro23 (talk) 12:48, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:13, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism due to 2016 San Diego Comic-Con presentation. Richiekim (talk) 14:14, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:18, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Mlpearc (open channel) 15:53, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Quietened down. NeilN talk to me 04:37, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short term IP vandalism (content blanking). -- LuK3 (Talk) 16:42, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I've blocked two IPs based on AIV reports. Let's see if any more show up. NeilN talk to me 16:45, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Quietened down. NeilN talk to me 04:36, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:04, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It may become notable in the future, I suppose, so I'm not making it indefinite at this time. Bishonen | talk 08:48, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring. User:Freyjadour lording and taking ownership of article. 112.210.32.86 (talk) 17:18, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Semi wouldn't do anything anyways. See WP:AUTOC. NeilN talk to me 17:31, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Edit war is on the part of new users repeatedly inserting their WP:OR. I considered filing this under a semi-protection for disruptive editing, but I'm not sure if it's "technically" disruptive. Amaury (talk | contribs) 02:52, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amaury, socking? NeilN talk to me 02:55, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@NeilN: Thanks for the swift protection. As for socking, I'm not sure as I'm not involved. I only became aware of the issue after I reverted this inappropriate warning left on Geraldo Perez's talk page and the user came to my talk page. Now the two users in question are being all combative on GP's talk page. Amaury (talk | contribs) 03:01, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@NeilN: In terms of socking, I strongly suspect it: [41] --IJBall (contribstalk) 04:58, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
IJBall, Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Eshumaitreyus --NeilN talk to me 05:00, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:28, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 04:35, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Previous protection expired on July 18, looks like IP vandals attacked since then. -- LuK3 (Talk) 04:49, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Extending prior semi. NeilN talk to me 04:56, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism and general BLP violations since early July. -- LuK3 (Talk) 05:04, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 05:07, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: IP hopping insertion of unsourced inappropriate material Meters (talk) 22:28, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 2605:e000:ac9a:a200::/64 blocked 2 weeks NeilN talk to me 23:19, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotect: On 20 July 2016 @Swarm: semi-protected Quantico (TV series) for "Persistent vandalism" which expires 20 August 2016. The page appears to be the subject of a content dispute - not vandalism. Swarm appears not to be active and has not responded to my question on his/her talk page. Toddst1 (talk) 18:32, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Toddst1: Hi Toddst! Apologies for being away. This article was semi-protected pursuant to a request here and the page history shows a concerning and persistent amount of vandalism and/or disruptive editing by IPs and new users. The page appears to be suffering from the "lawless", arbitrary and uncollaborative editing that so commonly afflicts these TV show pages, and we can only hope that the semi-protection will perhaps get this problem under control. I would argue that the benefits of semi-protection would outweigh the benefits of unprotection. This isn't a response to the content dispute you're involved in, and should not affect that dispute at all. You, AlexTheWhovian, and the third user Elainasla are all autoconfirmed and thus remain completely unaffected by the semi-protection of the article. It should literally not affect the content dispute at all. Swarm 17:44, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not done (For Swarm) NeilN talk to me 23:25, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: talk pages should not be protected. Flow 234 (Nina) talk 11:17, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Pinging Mark Arsten, who placed the protection. ~ Rob13Talk 13:09, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • protection policy: "Talk pages are not usually protected, and are only semi-protected for a limited duration in the most severe cases of vandalism." Policies are not written in stone but given how clear the precedent is on this I think an exceptional case would have to be made to justify upholding an indefinite semi. Given the page we're talking about, though, it's conceivable such a case could be made. Swarm 17:53, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • Semi-protection until November seems sensible, in my opinion. If I recall correctly, one of the reasons this is semi-protected is a sockmaster who was making accusations that Trump was connected to certain white supremacy groups repeatedly on talk pages. Those sorts of severe BLP violations justify semi-protection. ~ Rob13Talk 19:48, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I would be inclined to leave it protected until after the election as well. If memory serves, someone kept posting a flood of death threats there before I protected it as well. I suspect there will be a high likelihood of continuing disruption in some way or another, but I haven't been too active lately so I'll defer to a more active admin. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:04, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Set protection to expire on Nov-11-2016. NeilN talk to me 23:23, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – More sockpuppetry from Profile101. IP's of his are leaving threatening messages on my talk page. Class455fan1 (talk) 12:12, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Seems to have gone away for now. NeilN talk to me 21:46, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: Persistent vandalism. --37.248.154.194 (talk) 18:00, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 22:08, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent recreation of hoax article based on toy story 2. Atlantic306 (talk) 02:50, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 02:57, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Also targeted by the subject of this page. Blake Gripling (talk) 23:11, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 23:14, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring over multiple IPs. Binksternet (talk) 23:30, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 23:49, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Trut-h-urts man (TC) 00:20, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:28, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant short-term IP vandalism due to recent news events. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:26, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:07, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Redirect being changed to a hoax article copied from Toy Story2. Atlantic306 (talk) 22:09, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:14, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Article is a frequent target of IPsocks of User:Fangusu. Sro23 (talk) 22:12, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 6 months. NeilN talk to me 22:20, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

25 July 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 15:06, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Katietalk 15:47, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Appreciated, but this has been an ongoing case with an IP-hopping vandal. Semi-protection needed for when the anon logs on again with another IP and starts up again. --McDoobAU93 15:55, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
McDoob, I've blocked 2602:306:bcae:b570::/64 for 2 weeks. --NeilN talk to me 16:29, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 15:06, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Katietalk 15:47, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Appreciated, but this has been an ongoing case with an IP-hopping vandal. Semi-protection needed for when the anon logs on again with another IP and starts up again. --McDoobAU93 15:56, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
McDoob, I've blocked 2602:306:bcae:b570::/64 for 2 weeks. --NeilN talk to me 16:30, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Multiple vandalism editions by unregistered users.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 16:53, July 25, 2016 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 16:55, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 15:06, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Katietalk 15:47, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Appreciated, but this has been an ongoing case with an IP-hopping vandal. Semi-protection needed for when the anon logs on again with another IP and starts up again. --McDoobAU93 15:55, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
McDoob, I've blocked 2602:306:bcae:b570::/64 for 2 weeks. --NeilN talk to me 16:29, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 15:06, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Katietalk 15:47, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Appreciated, but this has been an ongoing case with an IP-hopping vandal. Semi-protection needed for when the anon logs on again with another IP and starts up again. --McDoobAU93 15:56, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
McDoob, I've blocked 2602:306:bcae:b570::/64 for 2 weeks. --NeilN talk to me 16:30, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Multiple vandalism editions by unregistered users.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 16:53, July 25, 2016 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 16:55, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Continuous IP vandalism. JTP (talk) 02:49, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Seems to have stopped after worst offender blocked. If it resumes, let us know. :-) Katietalk 15:49, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent replacement of sourced content with unsourced content by IP-hopping unregistered editor(s), despite attempt to resolve through discussion. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 17:56, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MikeLynch (talk) 19:52, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Rainbow Archer (talk) 18:02, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MikeLynch (talk) 19:57, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection or block IP: High level of IP vandalism. Glitchygirl (talk) 14:53, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I see some vandalism, but too far apart for me to think semi-protection would be helpful. MikeLynch (talk) 15:35, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 14:56, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. MikeLynch (talk) 15:41, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. clpo13(talk) 15:28, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. /64 range blocked one week. Katietalk 15:44, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced information by numerous IPs following transfer speculation. Egghead06 (talk) 16:17, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Maybe worth discussing it out on the talk pages? MikeLynch (talk) 16:25, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. On second thought. MikeLynch (talk) 16:50, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Reportedly traded (for Aroldis Chapman, see above), not confirmed. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:49, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:51, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Tony Tan · talk 17:53, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 18:02, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping makes blocking inadequate. clpo13(talk) 15:26, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 15:47, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by an IP-hopping anon editor. Most recent IP has been blocked, but user will resume under another IP soon. Temp protection needed to ward off further attacks until anon gets bored and moves on to another activity. McDoobAU93 15:58, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 16:16, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Baseball player rumoured to have been traded, however the trade has not been confirmed by the teams involved. Trut-h-urts man (TC) 16:32, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:34, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP sock related to blocked user Jajadelera. Jetstreamer Talk 13:17, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, seems to have stopped.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:03, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent full protection: Chinese propaganda is back in business. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 23:24, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, try dispute resolution--Ymblanter (talk) 10:25, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Shortly after a protection due to disruptive editing (adding a long list of places shown in Google 3D while ignoring discussions on the talk page), the same IP-family is back, probably sockpuppetry. The Banner talk 09:48, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:14, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 00:33, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:27, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Strange instances of vandalism. WP:UPROT. — Andy W. (talk ·ctb) 04:11, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 10:28, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP addresses keep copy-pasting the film's official synopsis word-for-word, not caring that it amounts to plagiarism, and never listen to us. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:12, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 11:57, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term disruption by IPs from New South Wales, Australia. Binksternet (talk) 07:54, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 11:59, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection or pending changes protection: General IP vandalism. Has a history of this silent IP hopping troll/vandal as well, although that isn't happening at the moment. —DangerousJXD (talk) 09:06, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 11:55, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term IP vandalism since previous protection expired in June. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:45, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 01:29, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated addition of improperly sourced material (the numbers added are just "own estimates" from a non-RS personal website) by obviously related throw-away accounts (개같은소리마라, 시비걸지, ㅁㄴㅇㅈㅂㄹㅈㅂㅈㅂㅇ, 11113jkkjk) . Thomas.W talk 09:22, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done I've also semi-protected World's largest cities, which was receiving attention from the same accounts. -- The Anome (talk) 09:29, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest someone re-evaluate this one. It was indefinitely semi-protected while it was being move protected seven and one-half years ago. The admin is inactive. Meters (talk) 06:50, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Sort of done. Reduced to indefinite pending changes to see how it goes. NeilN talk to me 00:31, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'll keep an eye on it. Meters (talk) 00:33, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2607:FB90:FD9:7064:0:41:DF4D:8401 (talk) 19:08, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 19:19, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by IP-hopper (see page history). Thomas.W talk 20:11, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:18, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: I'm trying to keep up in Pending Changes but this page is subject to the same lurid, inaccurate vandalism that's probably from one person hopping around on IPs. Given the tragic circumstances and the high likelihood that this page will continue to attract problems until the school year starts, I'd like it locked for a month. RunnyAmiga (talk) 21:50, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:21, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Asdisis IP sock disruptively reposting material. . - MrX 23:43, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Acroterion (talk) 23:51, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I think we need pending-changes protection for this article. Unregistered users are continuously changing India to Pakistan. Azad Kashmir has similar protection for the opposite problem. Kautilya3 (talk) 23:55, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 00:24, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

26 July 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A recently deceased controversial person. —Hexafluoride Ping me if you need help, or post on my talk 09:23, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Current protection seems to be working just fine. Widr (talk) 17:15, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism from many many IP's for many many years now. 70.51.84.138 (talk) 16:30, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 17:14, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi protection: persistent vandalism by IP and new accounts, after today's nominations. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 18:58, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 20:39, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hamilton the musical and cast

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP and new account vandalism. Long term and persistent IP and new account vandalism to the show and cast articles for the popular Broadway musical "Hamilton." Just as other related articles have already had to be protected, these are also long overdue. X4n6 (talk) 10:30, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony Ramos (actor) and Hamilton (musical) Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The remaining articles are Declined – insufficient recent disruptive activity to warrant protection. Katietalk 15:42, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article is currently PC protected until 24 August. I'm requesting a temporary semi-protection for a few days to deter further BLP violations. The past few days has seen a huge rise in BLP violations (check edit history). Semi-protection for a few days with continued PC protection should help to deter the vandals. st170etalk 17:52, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 19:23, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism today. Will most likely continue until/if he moves clubs. Thepersoncalledme (talk) 18:07, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 19:18, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism coming from Scotland. Some users are adding a fictional transfer to Celtic F.C., and others are countering it by putting sectarian bile against that team, calling them "The Famine" to mock the Irish potato famine. Neither camp is helpful here. '''tAD''' (talk) 19:15, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:37, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi protection: persistent vandalism by IP. Richard75 (talk) 07:43, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 2a02:587:3a16:4700:8000::/65 blocked 2 weeks. NeilN talk to me 14:55, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism since yesterday. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 17:19, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 17:23, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Mlpearc (open channel) 18:46, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. You're lucky I don't block you both for edit warring. Work it out. Katietalk 18:57, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism by IPs. Jamie Tubers (talk) 01:20, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:52, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – No reason any IPs need to edit this. —MRD2014 T C 11:47, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done -- Fuzheado | Talk 15:11, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Rainbow Archer (talk) 14:51, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Fuzheado | Talk 15:14, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. SLBedit (talk) 23:33, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:49, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full-protection: After the article was fully protected, various users attempted to mass add disputed content without consensus (based on talk page) using unreliable sources. Discussion on talk page has lead to nowhere with certain users adding disputed content. It would be better to protect it to minimize edit wars. Ssbbplayer (talk) 05:04, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full-protection: There are unilateral edits, using WP:PUS to go against Official statements of governments and disregard to consensus building. Opening it up is just attracting edits from random IPs and is heading towards edit warring. This is a highly contested issue and requires attention of Admins. Collagium (talk) 06:45, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:46, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP 67.169.174.187 is vandalising this page. Sesamevoila (talk) 07:34, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MikeLynch (talk) 07:47, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Page-move vandalism – I though this page was already move protected, but apparently not. One of Cow cleaner 5000's sockpuppets moved it to Talk:Al-Qaeda in Japan. —Farix (t | c) 11:37, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 11:40, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The user Sad9721 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) was permanently banned today from Wikipedia and it's doing extreme sock-puppetry in those 2 pages, because they aren't protected as it's the page List of European countries by average wage. This is one of the IPs, 151.40.22.202 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). Another one 151.40.73.239 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). All that it does is reverting voracious and referenced data or changing the data without references because it's not of his personal liking. I propose to protect those two pages for a term of 3 months, the page Economy of Italy has been protected a couple of times this year and as short as the protection ends, anonymous users start to edit the page. --TechnicianGB (talk) 12:30, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:39, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Hollyckuhno (talk) 13:41, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:44, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP editors adding unsourced content relating to unconfirmed trade reports. Trut-h-urts man (TC) 14:27, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:41, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Frequent unsourced speculation. Requesting protection until January 2017, event will not happen until April of next year and almost everything added before that will be speculation.LM2000 (talk) 19:26, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:54, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Extreme disruptive by IP's by way of removing mass-information without edit summary or discussion, etc. livelikemusic talk! 23:14, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MikeLynch (talk) 07:38, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Please SALT this page. Has been created multiple times under different names such as this and this. Please see related AfD discussions; first AfD and second AfD. Thanks. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 07:21, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected. MikeLynch (talk) 07:58, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Attempts to avoid deletion of non-notable info by moving it into other articles/redirects. The Banner talk 21:38, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. NeilN talk to me 22:52, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Recent wave of unref and erroneous changes from various IPs. Dl2000 (talk) 23:25, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 03:29, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:23, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator GorillaWarfare. NeilN talk to me 03:10, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JC · Talk · Contributions 03:14, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 03:27, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) 03:26, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 03:32, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – I guess a few days semi-protection will be enough to spoil the fun of the disruptive IP. Edit war. The Banner talk 14:30, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. NeilN talk to me 14:42, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Lots of IPs adding unsourced information. clpo13(talk) 22:26, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:54, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Multiple IPs vandalizing her spouse's name. Meters (talk) 22:41, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:56, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

27 July 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Omni Flames (talk) 11:00, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 16:58, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – We might want to start considering longer protection durations. Borcker has been targeting this page for six months. . GABgab 14:17, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 17:09, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – It has only one vandalism in its history but I noticed after inserting it with Twinkle, which shows how dangerous can vandalism in it be. Given how little it needs to change, let's lock it down for good. Codename Lisa (talk) 15:05, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected for a period of forever and ever, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 17:06, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP addresses re-adding unsourced, outlandish claims which violate BLP, although apparently encouraged by a tweet from the subject of the article. Initial IP blocked by @KrakatoaKatie: but others have immediately popped up. Melcous (talk) 16:07, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 17:02, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandal. Rainbow Archer (talk) 16:47, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 16:54, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A highly visible page just like those of any other country. No wonder all this vandalism needs to stop somehow. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 01:45, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 09:58, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent introduction of an image containing extensive Original Research from an IP user who claims to have created the image content specifically for the article; the image is heavily annotated with claims and commentary- the format of which makes editing exceptionally difficult. See https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kline%E2%80%93Fogleman_airfoil&oldid=731475906#/media/File:KFm_Family_of_Airfoils_Ver_2.gif Mavigogun (talk) 03:25, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. NeilN talk to me 10:00, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther :  Talk  05:41, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 10:02, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated Deletion of Important content by User:Mean_as_custard. The parts he deletes are not promotional material but serve as important information detailing the school's history, I was revising the content when he/she re-deleted the parts I was going to revise, so they would not seem promotional. Drewnewvillage (talk) 09:12, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Drewnewvillage, Mean as custard is right. Wikipedia articles are not the place to copy-paste your school's marketing materials. NeilN talk to me 09:26, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
But it is not promotional material, My time has been wasted. How frustrating!Drewnewvillage (talk) 09:35, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Drewnewvillage, First two sentences: "Now on its third decade, there is no turning back for IHMC-P, it vows to continue to give Good Quality Roman Catholic Education for all its students. To be able to know the success of the goal the school administration’s dream is to be ACCREDITED as an institution." 100% marketing material. If you don't realize this, then perhaps contributing to an encyclopedia is not for you. --NeilN talk to me 09:43, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing. Again.   Aloha27  talk  18:56, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Looking into a rangeblock, but it might be too big. Katietalk 19:00, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: After seeing the significant disruption from this organization, I've rangeblocked 2600:1003:b440::/42 for two weeks. Katietalk 19:08, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – One user is vandalizing and no administrators blocking him even after AIV report. Rainbow Archer (talk) 05:54, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:56, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated and very similar vandalism by various IPs. Lepricavark (talk) 11:01, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:10, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – per Ivanvector's recommendation at WT:SPI. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:34, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 09:52, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – per Ivanvector's recommendation at WT:SPI. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:36, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 09:55, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. I'd like to ask this page be locked to lower users as the Supernatural (U.S. TV series) fandom continually edits it to be about a fictitious angel Castiel from their show, & not about the biblical angel Cassiel. There was no talk page and it was suggested I put this here. Monroe Charles (talk) 00:22, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Orangemike. The protection was added after your edits. NeilN talk to me 09:48, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: fans adding an incorrect nomination, not following vmas rules of nominees. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 01:47, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 10:07, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent Addition of Hoaxes by User:Brianmagallano Sock. LG-Gunther :  Talk  07:10, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 10:04, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Some ip continuously adding unsourced content and making legal threats. - Managerarc talk 21:43, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MikeLynch (talk) 09:23, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editor, possibly connected to subject of article, continually removes reliable source discussing controversy about the subject of the article (presented as neutrally as possible), and adds statements and claims biased by editor POV and original research. — TAnthonyTalk 01:01, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Seems like a potentially problematic article. MikeLynch (talk) 09:33, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated additions of unsourced content, usually by anons. Occasional attempts also to promote ludicrous conspiracy theories. The appears to be some sort of cult figure but sources in the English language are pretty sparse. Sitush (talk) 08:23, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 1 year. NeilN talk to me 09:37, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated section blanking. KGirlTrucker81 talk what I'm been doing 01:48, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Drmies for one month. tutterMouse (talk) 06:53, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Mlpearc (open channel) 04:09, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:50, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same vandalism by IP hopper. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 06:03, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple IPs. --Rainbow Archer (talk) 06:44, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:54, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. clpo13(talk) 21:42, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by NeilN for 24 hours. tutterMouse (talk) 06:52, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of disruption today by dynamic IP addresses. EricEnfermero (Talk) 00:47, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by GorillaWarfare for 48 hours. tutterMouse (talk) 06:52, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:37, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done by someone else. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:52, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

28 July 2016

Pending changes: Every month or so an IP or new user vandalises/adds BLP vios to the page. Not frequent enough to warrant semi-protection IMO but pending changes is a good compromise. Yellow Dingo (talk) 11:36, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This is run-of-the-mill vandalism, and it's not even edited frequently enough to justify a month of PC. If that changes, let us know. :-) Katietalk 16:01, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent troll...again. —cyberpowerChat:Online 13:02, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 14:18, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I thank you, but the IP has a history of jumping to the next to continue trolling.—cyberpowerChat:Online 14:20, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If you'll set up an alternative talk page for IPs, like User talk:JamesBWatson and User talk:JamesBWatson/Open (for example), I'll be happy protect your talk page. Katietalk 16:04, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – People keep trying to add unreferenced birth date. Binksternet (talk) 17:59, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 20:56, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sock puppetry by socks of John Daker. BilCat (talk) 18:19, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 20:57, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. LG-Gunther :  Talk  03:14, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 16:00, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been vandalised on two occasions; the user may return to vandalise again (possibly with a sockpuppet account). Requesting temporary semi-protection of the article. Seba5tien (talk/contribs) 06:26, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Thanks for your report; if sockpuppetry does happen, please do report. MikeLynch (talk) 09:50, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pages targeted by Brianmagallano

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The pages have been targeted by a possible IP sock of Brianmagallano. That IP has been reported several times to AIV but no action was taken. Maybe the admins who declined those requests are in favor of that fucking vandal. Sixth of March 13:33, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Catholic Media Network Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The other two articles are Declined as this is one IP user, who I blocked. And just for the record, Sixth of March? Don't ask us for stuff and curse at us in the same breath. We're all fucking volunteers. Katietalk 15:40, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A recent vandal has been placing personal attacks on the page from a number of accounts. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:19, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Widr (talk) 19:21, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: There has been a slow-burn of reversions on this page. The content was removed to another page (now an FL), but this seems to have been missed by the IP. They have a dynamic IP, so every message I have left probably hasn't been seen. They have not replied to the message on the article talk page. I'm hoping a locked page will drive them onto the talk page, where things can be explained. Cheers. SchroCat (talk) 22:12, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 00:07, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Excellent. We'll just keep having a slow edit war with a user who is unwilling to use the talk page to discuss. Can a second admin look at this please? I'll remind you that the guidance for temporary semi-protection at WP:SEMI includes "Subject to vandalism or edit-warring where unregistered editors are engaging in IP hopping by using different computers, obtaining new addresses by using dynamic IP allocation", which is the case here. This IP will not stop as it stands, and pushing them towards the talk page is the only way we will,be able to stop the disruption. Six weeks should be all that is needed, to cover the monthly visits made by the IP. –'SchroCat (talk) 05:33, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    And what makes you think that this will get them to the talk-page? They may just skip one of their monthly vists...and sorry, the level of disruption really is not high enough to warrant semi-protection. Perhaps pending-changes might do the trick instead. Anyway, in olden times it would have been: just watchlist and revert. Lectonar (talk) 12:19, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • OK, we're already at six reverts since 4 May: at what point should I again request protection? Eight reverts? 10? Ongoing over a year? (I'm not being pointy in asking this: the reversions will continue—the IP considers it to be a "troll edit"—and I want to know when to ask again). - SchroCat (talk) 12:26, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That is why I included the suggestion to use pending-changes protection....Lectonar (talk) 12:33, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Nakon: Lectonar (talk) 12:34, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 16:46, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 18:13, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 17:13, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 18:15, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. Sir Joseph (talk) 18:37, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Widr (talk) 18:43, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content from unregistered users. The temporary pending changes protection put in place for this article on 2 July 2016, and set to expire on 2 August 2016, has not solved this problem. Jackdude101 (Talk) 00:40, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I agree that the load on the reviewers is a little high. However, I'm unwilling to jump straight to indefinite semi-protection on an article that has never been protected before. We use escalating lengths, so let's start here. :-) Katietalk 15:59, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs belonging to the banned User:Fangusu have been vandalizing page. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:36, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:38, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. The subject of the article is in a political campaign that ends on Tuesday, August 2nd and edits are changing his information to try and influence voters who come to the page. Requesting protecting for one week. Have had previous protection that expired two weeks ago. --68.112.41.109 (talk) 14:11, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 15:34, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent attempts to change the name of a band member without providing a reliable source. Multiple IP edits responsible on the main part. noq (talk) 14:33, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 15:32, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent and disruptive editing from numerous anonymous IP users who keep adding various unsourced cast members to the cast list. AJFU (talk) 14:40, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 15:29, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

None: Looking at the page history, there has been no vandalism in a long time. The page was protected in 2011 by User:Dabomb87 whose last activity was in 2014, and has stated that he/she is retired. MediaKill13 (talk) 14:04, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected I'm wary of this one, but what the heck. If disruption resumes, let us know and we'll lock it again. Katietalk 15:26, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An anon is pushing an incorrect view of the tournament--that those who participate somehow earn their berths. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:15, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. MikeLynch (talk) 10:06, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An anon is pushing an incorrect view of the tournament--that those who participate somehow earn their berths. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:15, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Are you aware you are close to breaking WP:3RR? This does not seem to be obvious vandalism but more of a content dispute. MikeLynch (talk) 10:06, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An anon is pushing an incorrect view of the tournament--that those who participate somehow earn their berths. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:15, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. MikeLynch (talk) 10:06, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. LG-Gunther :  Talk  03:07, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MikeLynch (talk) 09:46, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Mlpearc (open channel) 07:59, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:04, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Request pending changes protection - users add unsourced trivia to article - suggest permanent protection. Nordic Nightfury 08:43, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. I feel discussion and explanation of the rules/policies would work better. MikeLynch (talk) 09:54, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 10:53, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 11:00, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content from unregistered users. Jackdude101 (Talk) 00:30, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:05, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I give warning messages to vandals, and they come to vandalize my userpage. I will continue fighting vandalism and this will happen again. Nobody watches my userpage like others. Administrator's userpages are watched by 200-400 users. . Rainbow Archer (talk) 01:40, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected BethNaught (talk) 08:22, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is being targeted by multiple IPs within the last few hours. Seahorseruler (Talk Page) (Contribs) 03:07, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 08:41, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There are multiple edits that could also constitute vandalism over the last month and a half by IP users or new users. Please provide temporary page protection. Dane2007 (talk) 02:00, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 00:08, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Nakon: Would Indefinite Pending Changes protection be a valid request since most of the problems have been from IP users? After reading the disruptive editing policy I believe that might be a better avenue. Dane2007 (talk) 03:08, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by IP user via multiple IPs. Reverted several edits already due to this. Dane2007 (talk) 04:15, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Page protection was added. Dane2007 (talk) 05:13, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of unsourced, redlinked, apparently non-notable names by anons - almost certainly self-promotion. Sitush (talk) 07:28, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 07:46, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: An anon IP, an apparent sock of a registered editor, is persistently and deliberately reverting to poor and misleading grammar and a WP:DATED violation, and most recently left an insulting — and misspelled — edit summary. He seems fannish and defiant, and I anticipate he will continue to edit-war. --Tenebrae (talk) 21:04, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And in fact, he just left a defiant and grammatically poor note on my talk page: "You will leave the Olsen Twins alone i know more about them then you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.112.26.233 (talk) 21:01, 26 July 2016 (UTC)"
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 00:08, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: But this is not eventually a template. 333-blue 14:14, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Template editor protection is sufficient at this time. Nakon 00:11, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 18:33, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 23:58, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. KGirlTrucker81 talk what I'm been doing 19:34, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. (Create=Require extended confirmed access.) After this much time-wasting, if they have the makings of a suitable article, they can go through proper channels. - CorbieV 23:54, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@CorbieVreccan: Yeah, but the extended confirmed salting to me is very useful. KGirlTrucker81 talk what I'm been doing 00:56, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@CorbieVreccan:, extendedconfirmed protection is not authorized for this article. Please adjust the protection level. Nakon 01:02, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – also BLP violations (adding unsourced cast additions). 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 01:04, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 01:11, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Full protection is overkill with no mainspace transclusions. Eyesnore 19:35, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Please first contact Prolog (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) to request protection removal. Thanks, Nakon 23:58, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Presumably this was widely used in 2007, but it is indeed obsolete now. Thanks, Prolog (talk) 00:32, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected, for the bot. Nakon 00:59, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Article previously protected for a week after IP 94.173.35.2 repeatedly removed referenced content. Same IP has begun to remove again. Perhaps a longer protection period is neccessary? The IP in question doesn't engage in any editing apart from removing content from this article apparently at the request of the subject in question. 78.145.190.57 (talk) 11:56, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 00:09, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of BLP vandalism from IPs and new accounts over the past several weeks. bonadea contributions talk 12:22, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Widr. Nakon 00:09, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protection: Judging by the warnings on the author's talk page this page has been recreated three times after meeting speedy deletion criteria. GSMR (talk) 14:20, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 23:59, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Mlpearc (open channel) 16:09, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User blocked by Widr Thank you. Will re-report if they return. Mlpearc (open channel) 16:29, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Airplaneman 17:00, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP with dynamic address persists in deleting multiply sourced text despite compromise reached by registered users. IP's dynamic, unregistered status is also a hindrance to proper DR discussion and notification. Robert McClenon (volunteer at DRN) recommended requesting semi-protection Mmyers1976 (talk) 17:00, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 17:14, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP of an architecture firm is changing the earnings for an architecture. The edit information is lower then what the source material states. The page should be protected as users may use the page to get a quick understanding to judge pay rate. If an architecture firm is decreasing the number then the intent is malicious as the architecture firm achieves an economic benefit. Porchpop (talk) 17:34, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 23:59, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism from IPs. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:52, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Mattythewhite. Nakon 00:00, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 18:08, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Widr. Nakon 00:01, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 18:35, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Widr. Nakon 00:01, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 18:36, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Widr. Nakon 00:01, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 18:38, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Widr. Nakon 00:02, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: 5165 transclusions (details). Eyesnore 19:43, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected Nakon 00:02, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Laber□T 20:00, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Nakon 00:04, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term semi Talk has been protected twice already for disruptive IP edits from an IP hopper from Kerala, India. Both of these occurred after ANI threads failed to find a way to range block without it affecting a multi-million person group. Last semi recently expired, and IP has returned to disrupt. TimothyJosephWood 20:02, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 00:05, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Numerous IPs adding bogus info. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:23, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 00:05, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion, long-term disruption from Sicily. Binksternet (talk) 20:53, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 00:06, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. It was protected for a week, then the vandalism has re-commenced almost as soon as the protection was lifted. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 21:39, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 00:06, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistently high level of IP vandalism. David Biddulph (talk) 21:41, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 23:58, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by anonymous vandal using multiple IPs. This person continues to remove content and citations without any explanation, switching between more than 5 different IP addresses. When myself or others undo this vandalism, with in days or hours the vandal removes the content and citations again. This vandal has already attacked this page 17 times in this month.--Kfg12 (talk) 22:27, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 23:56, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: This page has been wrecked by an IP hopper who has ignored around a half-dozen attempts to engage in discussion about the edits, which are all blatant violations of the WP:PROMO policy. Blocking will accomplish nothing; a short semi-protect probably won't either since this has been going on under the radar for months. RunnyAmiga (talk) 23:42, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 23:56, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

29 July 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LG-Gunther :  Talk  08:30, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 15:11, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – AKJatt is sockpuppeting with IP(s). -- Spartacus! t@lk 09:51, 29 July 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I see this as an edit war. It does seem like AKlatt's edits are of low quality. It's true that an IP address added the same content as AKlatt, but only once. The other edits were made from autoconfirmed accounts, which won't be affected by semi-protection. Hopefully this allows for a cool down and discussion period. Airplaneman 19:47, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistant vandalism by anonIPs. ww2censor (talk) 17:49, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 19:40, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther :  Talk  19:15, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:26, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Content dispute/edit warring – persistent disruptive edit from IP and new users. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 13:05, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. It seems to me that someone is trying to add a poorly formatted claim that the subject was recently appointed youth ambassador in some capacity, and that you keep reverting it. While the reversion may be the right call, it's worth trying to discuss this with the user(s) and/or work with them to see if the content can be correctly added, if it is notable, instead of continually removing the edits. Airplaneman 14:57, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. LG-Gunther :  Talk  08:16, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Airplaneman 13:51, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Transfer speculation '''tAD''' (talk) 15:43, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:59, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Given the recent release of Pokémon Go, temporary protection will prevent users from using article to submit complaints about the game's reliability (multiple edits already reverted). Seba5tien (talk/contribs) 18:00, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:57, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism/hoaxing '''tAD''' (talk) 18:23, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:54, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Rainbow Archer (talk) 16:12, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:22, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page hijacked by multiple accounts and IPs. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:23, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:11, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Editor BaronBifford is edit-warring to make numerous contentious changes (see lengthy talk-page discussions with multiple editors) over issues for which is the the active subject of this ANI over his WP:OWN behavior, to which multiple editors have commented. --Tenebrae (talk) 17:16, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:29, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent no-source editing, mainly to unconfirmed cast members. Nordic Nightfury 06:34, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 15:21, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editors adding a new team which is not confirmed. Kante4 (talk) 13:56, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Fuzheado | Talk 15:50, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Linguist 111 talk 16:14, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 16:16, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated POV-pushing. The Banner talk 14:02, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

IP now also adding false sources. The Banner talk 16:42, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Was coming here to request protection for this page, but I see it already has been. Endorsing this request. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 15:04, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:08, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Rainbow Archer (talk) 17:44, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 15:13, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistant vandalism. Users adding fights that are either not confirmed, or utterly mythical Dimspace (talk) 19:10, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 15:06, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protection expired just over a day ago and the vandals returned. Armbrust The Homunculus 22:36, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 15:08, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) 23:51, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 15:10, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection Continued IP harassment from Hypocritepedia (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Nate (chatter) 03:03, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 15:19, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JC · Talk · Contributions 05:17, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 15:17, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous addition of false season name and cast member addition without any source . —IB [ Poke ] 16:38, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 15:02, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editor(s) keeps adding a match he did not play. Not sure what to do becuase of 3RR. Talked to him and warned him... Kante4 (talk) 17:39, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 15:04, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Rizhopper (talk) 08:28, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 13:57, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Sockpuppetry returned on the same day the previous period of semi-protection expired. My Chemistry romantic (talk) 10:23, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:59, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – As the Pokémon Go hype is still in full effect, I believe a longer block is more than reasonable. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 10:46, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hopefully this will lead to more people focusing on catching Pokemon rather than disrupting the page. Airplaneman 13:54, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Page is continuously susceptible to vandalism due to past controversies. I would request extended confirmed protection but that discussion hasn't ended yet. Eventhorizon51 (talk) 12:54, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:58, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Spartacus! t@lk 13:31, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:53, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:30, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose. No any vandalism. A link to the UEFA official site was added only. User Qed327 removed it without any reason. UEFA uses this page as temporary official site. For check, click "UEFA Nations League" in the bottom menu on uefa.com. 95.133.149.157 (talk) 21:40, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Katietalk 22:03, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Infrequent vandalism after IP blanked it multiple times. KGirlTrucker81 talk what I'm been doing 21:33, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined At least not yet. It's a static IP (apparently from the Estonian Defence Forces) and the last edits were almost twelve hours ago; if it resumes, AIV is the place to go. :-) Katietalk 22:06, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper re-adding material that he was already temp-blocked for previously. Going to try temp protection first, but this article has always been a huge vandalism target. User has indicated he will not stop the activity. MSJapan (talk) 23:00, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Beetstra for 1 month. tutterMouse (talk) 11:47, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: There has been a slow-burn of reversions on this page. The content was removed to another page (now an FL), but this seems to have been missed by the IP. They have a dynamic IP, so every message I have left probably hasn't been seen. They have not replied to the message on the article talk page. I'm hoping a locked page will drive them onto the talk page, where things can be explained. Cheers. SchroCat (talk) 22:12, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 00:07, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Indented additionally in hopes that the bot doesn't archive it. Airplaneman 20:50, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Excellent. We'll just keep having a slow edit war with a user who is unwilling to use the talk page to discuss. Can a second admin look at this please? I'll remind you that the guidance for temporary semi-protection at WP:SEMI includes "Subject to vandalism or edit-warring where unregistered editors are engaging in IP hopping by using different computers, obtaining new addresses by using dynamic IP allocation", which is the case here. This IP will not stop as it stands, and pushing them towards the talk page is the only way we will,be able to stop the disruption. Six weeks should be all that is needed, to cover the monthly visits made by the IP. –'SchroCat (talk) 05:33, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    And what makes you think that this will get them to the talk-page? They may just skip one of their monthly vists...and sorry, the level of disruption really is not high enough to warrant semi-protection. Perhaps pending-changes might do the trick instead. Anyway, in olden times it would have been: just watchlist and revert. Lectonar (talk) 12:19, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • OK, we're already at six reverts since 4 May: at what point should I again request protection? Eight reverts? 10? Ongoing over a year? (I'm not being pointy in asking this: the reversions will continue—the IP considers it to be a "troll edit"—and I want to know when to ask again). - SchroCat (talk) 12:26, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That is why I included the suggestion to use pending-changes protection....Lectonar (talk) 12:33, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Nakon: Lectonar (talk) 12:34, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Hello Wikipedia Admin - this page encountered several vandalism over time, last one taking place 7/5/16 when the Studio paragraph table was altered with a fake album name 'Me encanta la xx..'. Is it possible to make this page Semi Protected for 2 months? Let me know if I would need to provide more incidents examples for this request. Thanks in advance for help! --Laviniaknowswiki (talk) 15:36, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 21:57, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – After a rather escalated set of forth and back reverts, which is finally settled in User talk:Bender235#July 2016, this page has become a target of a sneaky vandal. I have been reverting sneaky vandalism from this IP range lately, the last of one of which was at Template:Orfurrev for which I came here. Of course, since admins have a range-checking tool for contributions, I believe they have no trouble verifying this issue. Codename Lisa (talk) 16:37, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One IP edit in three months. Katietalk 21:59, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – Seems to get some edit warring going on. This should do the trick. Sir Joseph (talk) 18:05, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is this topic related to the Arab-Israeli conflict except by virtue of being in the West Bank? The article is mostly about history and only mentions one modern conflict incident, which was not apparently state-sponsored. If so, ECP is not appropriate. BethNaught (talk) 18:11, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The article is currently in the middle of an edit war with edits that are under ARBIA control, so not sure how to proceed. It's a small article with not much editing other than those ARBPIA edits. It's close enough that I think it can be under EC. Sir Joseph (talk) 18:14, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
In which you are involved. Can you explain to me why it should say region=Israel? West Bank says that international law regards it as an occupied territory, not a sovereign part of Israel. (Incidentally, I reverted to the actual pre-conflict version which just says West Bank, not Israel or Palestine.) There are measures I can take, but I'm not putting your POV above others' just since you're extended confirmed. BethNaught (talk) 18:25, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Firstly, I'm OK with the way it is now, I think region as Israel is OK too since it's in the "region" of Israel not specifying a country, similarly to how the NY Region is in the Northeast, etc. Sir Joseph (talk) 18:27, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined This isn't close enough for ARBPIA3. If you want to start a community discussion about it, WP:AN is thataway. Katietalk 22:01, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. nableezy - 07:16, 28 July 2016 (UTC) 07:16, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected BethNaught (talk) 14:19, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. nableezy - 07:16, 28 July 2016 (UTC) 07:16, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected BethNaught (talk) 14:19, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. nableezy - 09:50, 28 July 2016 (UTC) 09:50, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected BethNaught (talk) 14:22, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unproetction This template-protected template is no longer high-risk since Template:RfD has been luafied and thus should be unprotected. Pppery (talk) 17:58, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Katietalk 22:20, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

30 July 2016

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unreliably sourced info and general vandalism about his "coming out" on Snapchat. Ebyabe talk - Union of Opposites04:56, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to have taken care of itself. --Ebyabe talk - Welfare State17:22, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not resolved. I advise at least a 3-day semi. --IJBall (contribstalk) 19:04, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 20:14, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – from the Talk:Moldova vandal. Ebyabe talk - General Health04:58, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 20:17, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Moldovan language vandal edit warring . Ebyabe talk - Attract and Repel05:50, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No Ebyabe, Ukraine Map. 83.220.239.80 (talk) 08:12, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 20:18, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content - Initial page author being overly protective of page, despite not providing sources to back up assertions; current edit tags all unsourced assertions while still acknowledging the "township" status issue. isagani (talk) 08:33, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. isagani, semi protection won't prevent autoconfirmed editors from editing. NeilN talk to me 16:18, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: controversial article. Kabahaly (talk) 11:23, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. NeilN talk to me 16:10, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Move warrior will not abide WP:BRD and is making a mess, moving to all sorts of error-laden titles. Please protect this to allow for discussion. RGloucester 18:13, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 18:51, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated numbers vandalism (inserting false numbers for economy, population etc etc) by either an IP-hopper or multiple separate IPs (see page history). Thomas.W talk 19:49, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 20:05, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of new editors try to edit this as their online profile - I don't believe semi protection will prevent many constructive edits. Pending changes may be useful here. -- samtar talk or stalk 08:16, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 16:15, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism taking place on this page. IP user reported to AIV after escalating WP:VANDAL warnings, user is continuing to vandalise. Requesting temporary semi-protect to prevent further edits, e.g. from this user or a sockpuppet. Seba5tien (talk/contribs) 12:17, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 12:25, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting temporary semi-protection due to vandalism – repeated addition of unsourced and non-constructive content by several unrelated users. Seba5tien (talk/contribs) 13:43, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:05, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of blogspam by IPs. SummerPhDv2.0 15:07, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:59, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – To protect page from vandalism. Aayush Sangal (talk) 08:54, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 11:26, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Longish Semi Nearly all of the last ~100 edits seem to be vandalism/POV pushing and reversion. I'm assuming the last semi expired in May, which is were constructive editing seems to have stopped. TimothyJosephWood 15:28, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:54, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. --Kansas Bear (talk) 15:43, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Socking. NeilN talk to me 15:49, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Omni Flames (talk) 22:06, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:28, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Persistent sockpuppetry. Linguist 111 talk 06:58, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Widr (talk) 11:33, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Full protection for a content disupute has ended, and this previously has had a long history of vandalism. Semi-protection should be restored ASAP. Snuggums (talk / edits) 15:05, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther :  Talk  22:17, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 22:36, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Increase from semi-protection to full-protection: There has been constant edit-warring on this article by one editor or another in past 20 days. This article has been protected in the past as well. People have been constantly editing overthwir personal prefernces rather than what the rules say. Edit-warring has erupted over range of issues like ridiculous non-neutral POV, ridiculous grammar, undue content and removal of sourced content and their reversal as well despite semi-protection. Discussion either doesn't happen and even when it did happen, it became heated. I doubt this will stop in the future and is likely to increase if the protection expires. Although increase in protection will stop me or others from editing it, I request to increase the level of protection as any non-admin editor including me will have to discuss and/or seek a consensus in case of a dispute as prescribed by rules. Thank you. DinoBambinoNFS (talk) 01:00, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined DinoBambinoNFS, I put that article under discretionary sanctions earlier today and just indefinitely blocked a sock. Let's see if that helps. NeilN talk to me 01:59, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from an IP adress, which seems to be used by one one of the member of the band. Synthwave.94 (talk) 01:32, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined See if warnings will get the job done. NeilN talk to me 02:03, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Several anon users keep adding contentious content. No explanation or whatsoever. If you look at the article history you will find this is a highly contentious matter. I suggest temporary semi-protection to perhaps encourage the anon(s) discussing it or even better discourage them from further contentious edits without any explanation or discussion. Shokatz (talk) 20:20, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 20:42, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A user's been IP hopping after their previous one gets blocked to readd the soundtrack/other GAMECRUFT elements. Zappa24Mati 20:38, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 20:45, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Airplaneman: The same situation's going on at the following pages: Zappa24Mati 20:55, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:08, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected MusikAnimal talk 22:11, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

31 July 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Again rumours regarding this footballer, that attracts a lot of vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 17:35, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:38, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, usually related to the religion of the article's subject. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 17:55, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:36, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: currently being repeatedly attacked by an editor (so far, two different IPs), making bizarre threats. WMF-emergency has been informed of this, in case there's any truth in the threats, but that still leaves the page open to what are basically public personal attacks and aspersions on a member of their staff. Short-term semi should do the trick, a couple of days maybe. Muffled Pocketed 18:59, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:33, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 10:36, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Katietalk 14:21, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: I would like this page to be semi-protected to prevent vandalism from unregistered editors. Woodstop45 (talk) 18:12, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Widr (talk) 19:24, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: This is the starting place of the Signposts featured content report, before it is moved to a release date-specific title. (That's because how the Signpost currently is published.) Please unprotect, so that I can start working on the next issue. Armbrust The Homunculus 12:57, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) I don't know much about the Signpost, but looks like it was protected because of a misguided (but probably good faith) request by Laberkiste. Pinging Nakon, the protecting admin. nyuszika7h (talk) 13:18, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected Trouts to to the above-mentioned. BethNaught (talk) 18:24, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. SatDis (talk) 08:47, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 13:56, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent inadequately referenced edits by politically motivated editor. LynwoodF (talk) 09:49, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Your editor will be autoconfirmed tomorrow. I've warned them, and if the behavior persists, report it to AIV for persistent addition of unsourced content or factual errors. Katietalk 14:03, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Currently regards a team trade that is not yet 100% official. 50.29.199.144 (talk) 13:05, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined It's official now. Katietalk 13:52, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – An editor keeps moving without discussion. Qed237 (talk) 10:48, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 17:00, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Additional of unsourced information by numerous IPs which commenced immediately after previous protection expired. Egghead06 (talk) 14:51, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:45, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – On-going socking by ipsocks of SalemHanna. SummerPhDv2.0 15:11, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:54, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. --Kansas Bear (talk) 15:31, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:49, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of unsourced/deletion of sourced, usually by anons. Article has previously been semi-protected for a year and still it goes on, so I think indef would be better now. Sitush (talk) 15:35, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 16:43, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sro23 (talk) 16:35, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Widr. NeilN talk to me 16:46, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Magnolia677 and Xboxmanwar have been edit-warring for a while on the page and have even brought their dispute to ANI, among other places. Gestrid (talk) 21:15, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. NeilN talk to me 02:23, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 08:27, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MikeLynch (talk) 08:33, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection or pending changes: Some people adding unofficial mirrors of the site, despite being asked not to do it.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 12:34, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 13:53, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – And the dynamic 88 guy is back again. Qed237 (talk) 23:06, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 04:07, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – On-going change of information, which is unsourced or poorly sourced, or even contradicting reliable sources within the article. livelikemusic talk! 12:33, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 04:17, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Content dispute modifications regarding the reception section; Consensus on Talk page indicated exclusion of identifying reviews as "Mixed" at this time but the page has been heavily edited going back and forth on this. Dane2007 (talk) 23:47, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Will warn on article talk page. NeilN talk to me 02:04, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Anon IP is edit-warring. Montanabw(talk) 04:03, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 04:30, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Reportedly traded, but he'd have to waive the no-trade clause in his contract first. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:04, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 04:32, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This request was made by an IP editor who is obviously a sock of a banned user. The requested edit will, of course, not be made. RunnyAmiga (talk) 03:45, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

I wanted to suggest something in the talk page for Anita Sarkeesian, however it's locked so here it is. I'd like to see the question discussed in the talk page:

I've examined all the provided references and I find the sentence:

The Tropes vs Women project triggered a campaign of sexist harassment against Sarkeesian

problematic. There is no doubt that she was subject to harassment, but the term 'sexist' is inappropriate and implies motive which has not been established. The sources themselves make the assumption that it's gender based ... but we've seen numerous examples where men with the same views as Sarkessian have been subject to similar harassment (if not at the same level) and it isn't because of their gender.

210.84.13.17 (talk) 10:28, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@210.84.13.17: Done I've added this, plus my reply, to that talk page. It sure would've been easier if you'd just gotten an account, though. RunnyAmiga (talk) 21:35, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Page has had regular disruptive editing over the past few months; requesting pending changes review requirement for this article indefinitely. Dane2007 (talk) 05:58, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 04:11, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page has received an influx of edits due to the album not being released (pop culture suggests fans believe it will never arrive) – requesting temporary semi-protect and a full revert of all the non-constructive edits. Seba5tien (talk/contribs) 06:21, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 04:15, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: consistent IP vandalism/disruptive editing. Unexplained removal of sourced material and consistent addition of unsourced material. You'll notice that these IP users are making the same unconstructive edits on numerous Korea-related pages. BlackRanger88 (talk) 16:00, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 04:20, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JC · Talk · Contributions 23:14, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 02:25, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Try this again, please review article history. Mlpearc (open channel) 03:05, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 04:26, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of IP users adding jokes about Hopkinson having a crush on Gavin Free (this is a joke originating from Gavin's Secret Admirer – Rooster Teeth Animated Adventures). IagoQnsi (talk) 02:27, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Looks quiet now. NeilN talk to me 20:20, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Article's subject is editing the page and removing a reliably sourced misdemanour that he not only did, but admitted to doing (Tweets of admission are embedded in the source). '''tAD''' (talk) 11:28, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Subject is also enlisting meatpuppets to cover his tracks '''tAD''' (talk) 11:30, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined NeilN talk to me 20:15, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Reportedly traded, but unconfirmed. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:53, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:52, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from IPs, typical of UFC events (specially PPVs). It will probably get worse as the event progresses. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 00:24, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:49, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MorbidEntree - (Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥)(Contribs)(please reply using {{ping}}) 01:20, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:45, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – I made a successful semi-protection request earlier today. User appears to have circumvented semi-protection (autoconfirmed?) and continued to vandalise the page, removing protection tags and making non-constructive edits. This page can be considered a popular target for immature vandal editors; I feel that Pending Changes protection would be appropriate. Seba5tien (talk/contribs) 19:17, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Seba5tien, the editor is autoconfirmed so pending changes is useless. I have warned them. NeilN talk to me 20:10, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Unsourced additions relating to unconfirmed trade reports. Trut-h-urts man (TC) 19:26, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please disregard, the trade is now official. Trut-h-urts man (TC) 19:39, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not done NeilN talk to me 20:02, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Mlpearc (open channel) 19:57, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct, Cyberbot I, but the protection was apparently only for 48 hours and it's already about to expire. No comment on whether or not it needs to be extended. RunnyAmiga (talk) 21:50, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already done by administrator Jo-Jo Eumerus. NeilN talk to me 23:21, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandal. Majora (talk) 00:00, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. I'm seeing where it's primarily one IP. I've just warned them about 3RR. —C.Fred (talk) 01:04, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Continuing to monitor, IP blocked. —C.Fred (talk) 01:06, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Random removals of content from numerous IP editors. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 02:07, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 23:03, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: An obnoxious IP hopper is edit warring over the genre of music the band plays. RunnyAmiga (talk) 21:05, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

He is genre warring and kept changing to "Rock" to "Pop". KGirlTrucker81 talk what I'm been doing 21:09, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 21:10, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]