User talk:Collagium

Aloha!!
If we look at evolutionary scale then this page is in amoebic stage right now.
Hopefully, it will reach T-Rex level soon. Fingers crossed!

Collagium, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Collagium! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Soni (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Collagium, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 03:41, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

2016 Quetta Blast

I have quoted the new source on talk page. Please do read the source before removing anything. Obviously Indian users will not like add RAW into this. --yousaf465 13:08, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As you were on article's talk page may I ask you to kindly read the ongoing discussion questioning the source you quoted before making same edits again and again so I don't have to revert them? Thanks! Collagium. You may speak. 13:11, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replied there. Rest of it will be mentioned in Talk page.--yousaf465 14:06, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Great! In future kindly read Talk Pages first when reverts specifically point at them before making same edit again. See Ya! Collagium. You may speak. 15:37, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm... Which were other three edits ? --yousaf465 08:16, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, The four edits by you which I reverted are : Revision 733837151, revision 733840632, revision 734034985 and revision 734117905. Collagium. You may speak. 08:22, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus for moving bugti statement doesn't exist. El cid, el campeador did while he was patrolling the RAW page. --yousaf465 09:20, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

El cid, el campeador discussed the edit in the talk page and other editors agreed and thus the edit was accepted instead of being reverted. Anyway, I suggest you talk with him on the issue. Collagium. You may speak. 09:33, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To quote it from Talkpage " Moved the RAW speculation to the reaction section. Because that's what it is, a reaction w/o evidence provided. Case closed. Now let's leave it there and all move on.El cid, el campeador (talk) 15:45, 11 August 2016 (UTC)"

He moved it and posted it on talkpage. While I supported your CPEC move and moved it. Instead of keeping it as such you reverted your own suggested move. --yousaf465 10:44, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The reason for reverting your edit is very simple. The proposal was made on the talk page asking for objections. You didn't wait for objections. However, now that there is no objection expressed by any editor please feel free to move CPEC. Thanks! Collagium. You may speak. 12:51, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]