User talk:ProtectorOfHaq

July 2016

Please stop assuming ownership of articles as you did at Al-Ahbash. Behavior such as this is regarded as disruptive, and is a violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. McKhan ^(talk) 07:38, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No where did I assume ownership but I cannot find any proof to claims on that page, so I removed them. ProtectorOfHaq (talk) 08:19, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You will find all the proofs under References. Wikipedia is not a blog but an encyclopedia which adheres to a Neutral Point of View (NPOV), thus, it needs the academic (i.e. "University papers" as per your words) and other verifiable sources to corroborate and substantiate the NPOV standard. I am afraid you are indulging into edit warring and assuming ownership of the article by removing all those academic and verifiable sources which are helping to keep this article to Wikipedia's own NPOV standar. Please, feel welcome to read the pertinent Wikipedia guidelines along-with the Talk Page History of this article. You will find out that the version you are vandalizing over and over again is in fact a settled version (no matter how strong you feel about it). Thank you. McKhan ^(talk) 09:00, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If it has verified sources (which it does not) show me proof that the Ahbash worked for the Syrian government, go through every "SOURCE" and you will see no proof of them allying with the Syrian government other than "they worked with the Syrian government" bullshit, Syria doesnt even allow Associations IN Syria, had we been with them we would have had centers all over Syria before the war and we wouldnt be assisting Refugees as we are currently, not only that but when the Syrian Gov left Lebanon, why didnt they give their "allies" any power? The Ahbash hold no power in government other than about a month ago when they got voted into a few municipal seatings so spare the BS.ProtectorOfHaq (talk) 23:10, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The sources (i.e. Pierret, Thomas (2010). "Al-Ahbash". Basic Reference (Scotland, UK: Edinburgh Academics) 28: 217–229. doi:10.1017%2FS0020743800063145. Retrieved27 April 2012., Raphaël Lefèvre (April 2014). "The Roots of Crisis in Northern Lebanon" (PDF). Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. p. 8. Retrieved 28 October 2014., Dietrich Jung (18 September 2004). Jung, Dietrich, ed. The Middle East and Palestine: Global Politics and Regional Conflict. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 156.ISBN 9781403982124, Gary C. Gambill (December 2007). "Islamist Groups in Lebanon" (PDF).Middle East Review of International Affairs 11 (4): 44. Retrieved 12 April 2015., Nicholas Blanford (25 August 2006). Killing Mr Lebanon: The Assassination of Rafik Hariri and Its Impact on the Middle East. I.B.Tauris. p. 177.ISBN 9780857714053 and more) you are calling "bullshit" are not only verifiable but also from peer-reviewed academic journals and written by career academics and they help Wikipedia's NPOV standard a lot. Otherwise, hypothetically speaking, anybody who is the adherent of the Al-Ahbash ideology or Wahabi ideology or any other ideology will convert the Wikipedia pages into blog entries in which they wouldn't want to mention or see anything negative about their favorite ideology (or subject, topic, hero, favorite person .etc) at all but all the good things. I am afraid Wikipedia doesn't work that way as it is an encyclopedia but not a blog. I will strongly urge you to read the pertinent Wikipedia guidelines before editing on Wikipedia constructively. The version you are vandalizing and calling its sources "bullshit" is the closest Wikipedia's NPOV compliant version and is the fruit of countless discussions and re-discussions. Please, go through the Talk History of the Al-Ahbash. Let's not reinvent the wheel here. Thank you. McKhan ^(talk) 01:11, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Wikipedia is not censored. Any further changes which have the effect of censoring an article, such as you did to Al-Ahbash, will be regarded as vandalism. If you continue in this manner, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. McKhan ^(talk) 08:39, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ProtectorOfHaq, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi ProtectorOfHaq! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Doctree (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Aicp

The article Aicp has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

ProtectorOfHaq, the creator of this page, is complaining about content of Al-Ahbash which he has been vandalizing for the past few days. Since he is not having his way, he has decided to create this page with the sanitized and favorable information he wants the Wikipedia to show about his favorite organization Aicp also known as Al-Ahbash. He lifted quite selectively most of the content from Al-Ahbash. Hence this request for deletion. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. McKhan ^(talk) 01:56, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]